Episode 2664 CWSA 11/19/24

he little bit mixed that's not that bad could be worse let's call up the comments because we got a show coming oh my goodness probably the best thing you've ever seen good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and I don't think you'll ever have a better time in your life but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a cuper muger glass of tanker chel or Stein the canteen jugg or flask of vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine end of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous zp and it happens now oh so good I mean really sometimes it's so good I can't even can't even stand it well you'll be surprised to hear that there's a new study that identified the huge positive health effects of coffee that's right apparently it's really good for your gut bacteria gives you fiber oh my goodness it can make you uh coffee can make you levitate off the ground um it will make you immortal and possibly being able to fly long distances by flapping your arms okay none of that last stuff is true but every day there's new information about coffee and I wouldn't rule it out it could be a fuel of the future meanwhile a in the publication pulse uh somebody wrote an article about all the mental health benefits of laughter huh so it turns out that laughter which is a subset of being happy is good for your health well they could have saved some money by asking me but some of the things they found is that laughter reduces your Stress and Anxiety don't you feel better already it improves your mood and it combats depression it enhances Your Sleep Quality it improves your cognitive function it builds your social connections now that's a lot of good stuff yeah so if you find yourself laughing at any time during this podcast you'll probably feel yourself just getting healthier every moment all right there's a Pennsylvania School according ARS Technica had to shut down because one clever student figured out how to make deep fake um nudes of the female classmates and rather than making just one he made 50 different he made 50 different deep fakes of his of his female classmates 50 different ones now here's my question was there really only one kid who knew how to do it and so he did 50 of them or is it at a point where they can all do it because I wouldn't know how to do it every AI that I know how to use wouldn't do that if he want if he has it to so there must be some kind of like secret you know dark web deep deep fake AI that if you knew what it was you could use it now here's the problem uh sure they can shut down that one school sure you could punish that one person yep probably never do it again but I was once 14 is is anybody here who was also a 14-year-old boy at any time in your life have you ever been a 14-year-old boy if I were a 14-year-old boy and you handed me a tool that was free and could turn anybody I wanted into a uh a porn you couldn't pry that out my 14-year-old hands how in the world are you going to stop this I there's this is going to be to Infinity this is Unstoppable and kids are going to do it so I don't know what you're going to do about that I think I think the weird horrible future is that every young woman will have to just get used to being in a porn that she wasn't in that her deep fake was in I don't know I I honestly I think there's literally zero way to stop it if there was an AI that could have done it in the first place and that's apparently out there and somebody has access to it doesn't look good but anyway a robot dog you've seen all the robot dogs uh one of them just finished in South Korea uh finished a marathon on one charge so with one battery recharge a robot dog ran a marathon so calculating distance I would feel safe living near a robot dog 10 miles nope 15 miles too close too CL 26 miles not enough you get to get farther than 26 miles away from your robot dog if it's you know got a weapon I for one do not trust robot dogs pit bulls are looking good I might get a pitbull to fight the robot dogs um you've seen that more athletes are doing the Trump dance you know the Trump dance it's the danestone can do it if I see a uh a little viral video on Tik Tok or something and I I'll see the young people doing these dances where it looks like they're floating over the floor and they're they're Moon walking like crazy and they're you know they got all kinds of things going on I look at that and I say hey I could do that if I spent the next year of my life doing nothing but practicing that one 15-second dance but you show me the Trump dance and I I look at that and I go hold on people hold hold on there's a dance I could learn pretty quickly so let me see if I got it is that it do I have it yet I I think I'm close probably another week or two of practice I could nail that yeah so US soccer Legend uh Christian pilic you all know I mean obviously you're all huge fans of American soccer so you would know you would know the name of our best American soccer players obviously so Christian pilik very well known in America he did the Trump dance after scoring so I I saw a compilation clip a few times of the various football players and other athletes doing the Trump dance and even uh one of the winners at the U UFC but do you think it's really widespread because when you see on the news and there's five instances of it you think well this is everywhere but there might be five so I'm not I'm not quite ready to say that it's safe to wear your magga hat and and if you do the Maga dance in front of your school on Talent night you'll be perfectly fine because I don't think you will I still think that hiding might be your better play for now unless you're a famous athlete and then you can do what you want according to geeky gadgets open AI um and Microsoft they're making this gigantic new Improvement in in their AI chat GPT and this is a big one because they're going to give it near infinite memory capacity so if you're trading your AI you can upload much larger documents but it will remember it all which it doesn't do now and if you um have a lot of interactions with it it will remember you basically forever so you can build a little agent um and this is the for me this is the first time it looks like it could be a real product the AI that we've seen so far or just for demonstrations and you know maybe laugh here or there a deep fake here or there maybe make a deep fake your classmates but really not much of a product however if you could build a an agent that would remember everything it ever learned and you could just train it by talking to it and it would remember everything he said apparently it can also build its own skills so you could train it to go out and acquire new skills and it can sort of grow on its own now put it all together and what do you have that's right we're getting closer and closer to the scottbot where I take my Consciousness and my personality and I move it to a digital Forum to live forever and no I'm not joking about this at all I don't know if it'll be the chat GPT model but if chat GPT can do it I'm sure that others can what I don't know if I can do yet is imitate a person so I don't think chat GPT yet can do a deep fake because I need it to do all these things it can do but also talk like me and look like me I don't think it can do that yet so maybe it'd have to be two AIS working together or something like that but close well another news uh apparently there's a weather event heading my way let's see what's it called is it rain no 's see a storm no uh it's called a bomb cyclone that's right a bomb Cyclone is heading for me Northern California but I'm I'm I'm at the I'm at one border of what it's going to hit now I don't have to tell you that I'm not too happy about a bomb Cyclone heading my way sometime today but if if I I'll tell you if I walk the dog I'm not going to let go of the uh the leash because I've got a feeling my dog's going to be like a kite I'm just be walking around dog will be floating ahead of me all right um so today is the day that judge Maran uh rules something about Trump I get all the law fares confused which one is Marshon is he the he's doing which trial tell me which one he is I don't care yeah so the question I was asked is do you think judge Maran will delay whatever he's doing or drop the case whatever he's doing I forget which one he's on and I've did I think my answer is he'll do whatever is bad for Trump that's my answer if if he has any path that's bad for Trump but also somewhat realistically within the bounds of things he should be doing he'll do that I think that you'll just see something that's whatever is the most negative thing he can do under the circumstances so I don't know what that would be but look for it here's what I don't expect oh okay you're president now this just needs to go away I don't expect that maybe maybe or maybe it'll be postponed until after he's president or something but I can't imagine they would take the risk away from him completely because I think they just hate him so they would want him to twist as much as he can so I looked into a little bit the uh Trump's pick for Energy Secretary his name is Wright and uh I like it according to the verge did a little right up on him so apparently the energy secretary is an entrepreneur who has made a ton of money and his company does like 10% of the fracking uh or 10% of the oil I guess in the US so he's knows everything about fracking which is good but here's the best part he also seems to be way up on geothermal because his company also invests in geothermal and nuclear so he's got investments in a in a nuclear power plant that Sam alman's involved with as well so uh and and then he also says that climate change is not a crisis he doesn't say humans are not warming the Earth he just says it's not a crisis now that's kind of perfect I don't know if I could be happier honestly because the thing you worry about in energy but by the way let me say this clearly there are some jobs where I think you absolutely need experience in the domain this is one of them I think the Energy Secretary should know something about fracking something about geothermal and something about nuclear and ideally solar too although I think that's a little easier to understand so not bad I'd be pretty happy with somebody who has that much knowledge I don't think that's as important in even jobs like defense uh I I think I think they're a general or or generic very smart person who's got the right intentions could do fine there's lots of examples of that um I saw on this maybe you saw this on Joe Rogan show he was talking to uh special forces veteran FN haer haer or haer AER haer anyway he's one of the founders of Black Rifle coffee I think and he was talking about with his own experience as a special forces guy he says if we declare war on the cartel which is something Trump said you do uh these dudes are not going to understand what the f is going on they are in for a world of ultra violence that they've never actually felt before they have they have effing no clue if we organize these tier one units against them uh what I would be doing if I were down there I'd be getting ready to retire right now because if Delta Force is hunting me bro I would be so terrified now is that hyperbole because it seem to me the cartels uh are quite quite aware of what violence looks like but mostly they're doing it out so if some came to them uh from something other than a competing cartel which of course they have some violence from I don't know do how many of you think that the cartel would try to bring the pain to main to Mainland America to see if they could get Delta Force or something off their back here's what I would suggest if I could give some advice to the cartels if we come after you with the military it's going to be devastating to you if you attack the United States citizens let's say do some terrorist attack because you're trying to take the pressure off it's going to be way worse because if you think we're pissed off now just to a terrorist attack on mainland United States and then we're and then we' take it to the ground we'll do whatever it takes just one have you seen the United States we only need one attack against us and we'll just go crazy have you heard of 911 we spent a trillion dollars after 911 yeah so if anybody from the cartel is listening if the Special Forces come after you you need to immediately try to make a deal either leave the country or try to make a deal but don't attack American citizens because that's not going to work out for you at all not even a little bit will that work out so I can promise you that so I don't know if this is going to happen I do worry that Trump will get the talk you know where the Special Forces boss comes in and says you know we kind of have an arrangement with the cartel I think that's what's going to happen so if I had to predict I would predict that we will not use special forces against the cartels I hate to say it but that's my prediction um Thomas Massie and a lot of other people warning about uh the new aggression that Ukraine is showing toward Russia and Biden has authorized these long range strikes of these long- range missiles that we provided to Ukraine and that authorized the use of them within Russia itself which Russia says the Kremlin says that means the United States or well NATO that means that NATO is at war with Russia and they will act accordingly uh oh now you're worried about nuclear war and you're worried about this getting on a hand some have suggested that the reason that Biden authorized this so soon um before you know or so close to the switch over of power that his real intention is to handcuff Trump and make sure Trump can't come in and solve a war on day one that Biden couldn't solve so do you believe that do do you believe that any part of Biden's intention is to make Trump fail at making peace I don't think I don't think so because I think this works in Trump's favor the the closer you get to complete destruction of both countries or all countries involved the closer you are to peace unfortunately that's just the way it works there's no other if you don't have the threat of you know you're definitely going to be dead if you keep on this path like not any question about it 100% you're going to be dead that's when people get flexible if they think they're not going to be dead they might act that way but uh yeah we need to be at the point where serious people are afraid of nuclear war that's how you get peace but would you like me to make sure that there's no nuclear war is there anybody who would like to ask me to guarantee that there's no nuclear war between Russia and NATO and the US I'm willing to do it I can do it right now if you like all right and all we really need is a blanket some of you will understand this some of you will not those who understand will have to explain it to those who don't but here's how we avoid nuclear war Russia you know you don't want nuclear war with the United States it's literally the last thing you want Ukraine you know you don't want nuclear war it's the last thing you want NATO us you don't want nuclear war it's the last thing you want do you know what all of you do want you want the big dog to get off the porch you want January 20th to come and you want to look as Fierce and dangerous as you can be so that when you walk into those negotiations you have maximum leverage and then the big dog's going to make a piece and you're going to accept it you're going to complain like crazy but you're going to accept it so Russia and NATO your two choices are this nuclear destruction of all of civilization or wait a few weeks and everything will be fine which of those two choices sounds better to you complete nuclear destruction of civilization before we even get to Mars or how about we just work it out on around January 20th 21st something like that now given that every smart person in the world believes that a negotiated peace is now not only possible but guaranteed and we know that Putin as tough and mean as he can be some say evil but I'll tell you what nobody accuses Vladimir Putin of being irrational nope not once he's not an irrational guy do you know what Trump is not irrational you you can hate his policies you can hate anything he says his posts blah blah he's not irrational he's very very transactional and so is Putin so you've got the two most transactional leaders the strongest ones the ones who can get what they want because they have enough clout in their own land to do it they both want peace they want a lot and of course it's going to happen so here's what you need to know if you're worried we have the lowest chance of nuclear war with Russia right now between now and you know January mid January it's the lowest risk of nuclear war it'll never be lower than this it's close to zero and the reason is that 100% of the people involved can see that simply waiting is almost guaranteed to work whereas using a nuke is basically death we've never seen choices this clear so could something accidental happen well I suppose but in terms of intentional nuclear war it's the lowest risk in your lifetime because it would be the only time that there's no argument for a nuclear war the next few weeks none a few missiles go into Russia sorry that's not even close that's not even close to a nuclear war it would be maybe if it were closer to the beginning of the war or look like Russia couldn't win you know maybe if things were different it would be dangerous but in our current exact situation you have the lowest risk of nuclear war you you've ever experienced in your life nobody wants it and and and I think that both sides are probably one assumes or at least one hopes probably both sides are giving a little extra attention to making sure there's nothing accidental that happens because an accidental any kind of accidental alert um that would make one side spooked would be the worst thing you could do so they probably have also the most attention they've ever given to making sure there's no accidental thing I would imagine that they're testing the the red phone every 5 minutes is that still a thing is there still like literally a phone you can pick up in the White House and and Putin's going to be pretty close to picking it up yeah they're going to make sure that we have a direct line of communication that there's no delay and if somebody gets a false signal one way or the other you want to be able to call and say did you just send a new car way and we need to say no or whatever vice versa so we'll be fine it's actually the last thing I'd worry about today it's not even on my list of things to think about you will be fine but it but the only reason you'll be fine is that all the reasonable people are up in arms right if you just sort of ignored it that would be the wrong thing but being super alert to how big a deal this is is good that's where you want to be that's where we are all right um the Gateway Punda says that uh people in the doj and FBI at least the officials are hiring their own criminal defense lawyers ahead of Trump's return now how often have you hired a criminal defense lawyer when nobody has even accuse you of a crime have you ever done that well nobody's accused ACC me of a crime and as far as I know I haven't committed any but you know I think I'd better get myself a criminal defense lawyer well some of them might be genuinely innocent of all crimes and maybe just worried but it sure looks guilty doesn't it now they're all innocent until proven guilty so that the standard is Innocent but if it's really true that they're ler lawyering up I feel that on some level they think that there's a real risk on some level I think a lot of people know they were part of a conspiracy and I don't know if they know if that conspiracy was legal or not because let's say let's say there was enough evidence for a RICO uh Rico prosecution and it could be in several domains because the the Democrats and you know everything from the military to the mainstream press and the intelligence people they seem to coordinate on a lot of stuff so at what point does the coordination if the outcome is something illegal hypothetically at what point does the coordination toward that one outcome that's illegal become Rico so you can see a situation where somebody just took a meeting or took a phone call and they were sort of in on the plot but maybe not not super actively you know they were just sort of part of the conversation and maybe didn't do something to stop it are they part of the RICO can you go to jail for being part of the conversation because the the whole Rico is that it's a coordinated group planned activity if you're part of the people who are plotting even if you didn't do the action but the people who did the action met with you and got some advice and you said well I'm not going to stop you are you guilty I have no idea so I want to say again as I'll say this many times because I think the more I say it the better I'm completely opposed to any Trump lawfare if I see even a even the scent of it I'm going to go nuts because we didn't go through all this work just to put a bunch of in charge right we didn't fight this hard to get rid of law fair just to do our own law fair that's that's no go you better have really really good evidence of a crime you know the way it should be you should have really good evidence of a crime and I wouldn't go looking for it if there's not anything that's you know somewhat on the surface so no we I am absolutely not okay with lawfare as any kind of Revenge and and believe me I feel like I've been a victim of coordinated activities my cancellation I don't think happened just all in a vacuum yeah I'm pretty sure that was part of the larger you know Democrat political strategy to cancel everybody they can but even then I don't I don't want anybody who didn't break a law to go to jail I want zero of that all right so they got their lawyers uh as Mike stovich says what on a post on De he said what Democrats did in Pennsylvania gives Credence to 2020 stolen election claims future claims will be informed by what we all just saw stolen election deniers uh oh we'll call them stolen election deniers not election deniers as we shall call them now carry the burden of proof so what he's talking about is that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court told the election board to stop counting illegal votes an illegal vote would be one that has let's say um a non-matching signature or there's something irregular about it that makes it uncountable um but the election board decided to just ignore the core order and just keep counting them now somebody said that it wouldn't be possible to easily back back out the ones that are miscounted because maybe they're not separately keeping track for the ones that are illegal in case there's a you know motion to remove exactly those illegal ones but nothing else if they can't tell which ones are illegal and which ones are legal when they're done counting what's your recourse then an audit and then you just still don't have an answer about who's the senator it goes on for months um I don't know but to me I'm I'm going to agree with cernovich on his take that watching the Supreme Court tell them to stop counting illegal votes and then watching the election board try to do it anyway certainly suggests that rigging is normal me meaning that this doesn't look like something that somebody came up with that they never thought of before it just has that feeling like you kind of did that a little naturally they just kept counting and they kept finding all these votes well I personally have no proof that uh Pennsylvania is going to end up doing something illegal but we do know they're violating the order of the Supreme Court in Pennsylvania so do you go as far as I do and say that cernovich is right that just watching this tells you that 2020 was probably crooked anyway um there are now six Democrat leaders at least to say they will not comply with Trump's new government immigration enforcement so you've got the Arizona governor Illinois governor Colorado governor Massachusetts governor and also the mayors of Chicago and Boston which are obviously in two of those States so you've got four states they have some leaders saying that they're going to resist immigration um enforcement and my question is this how much can they how much can they interfere before they go to jail what exactly does it look like when they interfere they interfere on what level now it'd be one thing if they tell their local police you know don't talk to the feds that wouldn't be surprising and maybe that's legal maybe that's okay I mean not okay but maybe it's not technically illegal but what else would they do suppose they tried to hide them suppose the government got involved in hiding illegal immigrants of the kind that we' want to deport don't you go to jail for that like at what point is this just jailable offense that you're not going to let the government do the thing that the government is tasked with doing defending the country I guess we'll find out meanwhile the the uh stock of alphabet you know the owner of Google and more uh is down pre-market anyway because people think that the Trump doj will push for Google to sell off its Chrome browser to break its Monopoly what do you think do you think that Google's going to get broken up by uh Trump officials I don't know it are Republicans typically the the the Monopoly Busters what's the history of Monopoly busting has that been more on the left or more on the right it's been on the left hasn't it so but in this case Google looks like an enemy to um democracy so that I think the Republicans might look at this as less of a monopoly problem and more of a um disinformation problem meaning that if Google can control what you see they can control the election now do you remember the uh do you remember was it Dr.

Epstein I think who said that Google could change an election by quite a few points what would happen if Google had not been influencing the election and mainstream media had not been trying to influence the election and the fake polls had not been trying to influence the election how much would it how much could Trump have won by if you took those you know those biasing factors out I don't know maybe more I'll tell you the thing that is surprising me the most is that Democrats are confessing failure and I'm wondering if that's because they don't have current leadership if they had leadership wouldn't they be selling a narrative instead so if there was somebody who could say hey Democrats I am your leader uh you should give this messaging and they'd say something like uh well the election was actually kind of close if you look at you know the 70 some million versus 70 some million is kind of close and but you're not seeing that so much you're actually seeing Democrats saying we got we got our asses kicked we lost as bad as you can lose we better look at what we're doing to see if it's wrong I've never seen this I've never seen anything like that before now why do you think it is that they're accepting I think it's the lack of leadership isn't it because if they had a leader the leader would be telling them to to hang tight stay strong don't admit any mistakes um kind of immediately regroup but there's nothing like that happening that they are just floundering and flapping around and and every day that I think that I will be done enjoying how much they don't understand why they lost I'm surprised because once again another full day of being entertained by democrats who try to explain to themselves and to others why they didn't win and they're not even close they they they just don't seem to understand really anything it's like they have been around for the last eight years or something like they just landed on the planet it's kind of weird now the reason of course is that their information Silo was completely fake and has been fake for probably a decade at least if not forever so they had no idea what reality looked like imagine can you imagine the size of the mind if you thought that the Trump supporters were a minority of the country and like a a really serious minority and then you found out that they literally outnumbered you and that all the the Hitler blaming and the the fascist stuff and the deplorable stuff didn't make any difference like imagine waking up to that and your your whole reality is upside down now because you don't know if you're one of the bad guys and I have some bad news for you Democrats I don't mean this as just like a like a throwaway comment insult you have been the bad guys I don't think it's all intentionally like uh on purpose I believe that the the uh media information landscape was so distorted by a few bad actors that you honestly thought the world was a different place than what it is and then you acted accordingly now I think that Democrats in in the information bubble that they were in were acting for the the greatest good that's what it looks like to me it looks like their intentions were entirely based on the greater good and if you listen to them talk that's the way they talked you know this is good for this group it's good for that group now of course it wasn't for the greater good it was destroying America but they didn't know they they thought things were going swimmingly because the news that they watched said this Joe Biden thing's got everything under control his brain is working perfectly and if anything ever went wrong God we're lucky we've got KLA Harris the highly qualified vice president to take over immediately If Ever Needed none of that was ever true not I don't think anything probably almost nothing that was an official claim of the news or the media was true almost nothing now there's fake news on both sides obviously it's not limited to one side but the extent of it uh I think was unparalleled I think the Democrats broke some new kind of record for fooling themselves um what else we got here so now axios and you're seeing a little grumbling from Democrats saying that uh if if there are millions of deported undocumented immigrants if Trump goes ahead with it it will create gigantic negative effects in the economy meaning that the people who need to pick the crops and do the work they're not going to have enough workers and it will be a 6.8% drop in the national GDP all right do you believe that here's what I think um I I never have any resp respect for the critics Who start with okay assume you do everything the stupid way and then then I want to say wait wait wait wait stop talking no no we need to we need to discuss what's going to happen Okay but your assumption was that I was going to do a thing that could easily be done the smart way but you're saying let's start with the assumption that you do it the stupidest possible way yeah yeah yeah let's do that so let's talk about tariffs and we're going to put 100% tariffs on everything wait wait wait wait wait no tariffs are a negotiating tool so I'm not going to accept your assumption that we' use them in the stupid as possible way which is put it on everything without thinking about it we might do a strategically we might try to protect an industry we might say we're going to do comprehensive tariffs just as a negotiating tool but don't assume that we're going to do a smart thing that could easily be done the smart way and people have done it the Smart Way forever the Trump will be the only one who will do it the dumb way so here's how you do immigration the dumb way the dumb way would be on day one uh go get all the Farm Workers I mean seriously do you think that the U border the border patrol and ice and the th those people do you think they have enough resources to start with the Farm Workers and that they would and that that would make any sense at all to anybody like who would agree with that there isn't a person in the world who would do that now could you imagine that Trump starts with the criminals and maybe people who came in in the last few months yes easily of course I can imagine that so why would you make the assumption that he would do the dumbest thing you could possibly do which is get rid of the undocumented migrants who are already adding to the GDP now over time you could imagine that the undocumented migrants picking crops that honestly we're not going to get Americans to do that uh you could imagine that they slowly get replaced with documented people or their own status gets you know upgraded so that hey you're you're a good seasonal worker there's no reason not to let you in because you show that as soon as the crops are picked you go back home you share your money we have no problem with that so you could imagine that the undocumented Farm Workers which are necessary would over time get transformed into a legal group of people that may or may not come from other countries but we're not gon to we're not going to starve the country by rounding up rounding up the crop Pickers don't assume that we just start stupid and stay that way I'm not going to have that conversation but that's the one that's what the uh uh the Democrats are trying to make you think past the sale the sale is that Trump is going to do the dumbest possible deportation no I do not accept that he would do the dumbest possible deportation I will only accept that he would get rid of the criminals and maybe the most recent arrivals first and if we could ever get to the end of that pile which I don't think we can well then maybe you look at some other stuff but but we would do it smartly um yeah anyway according to uh one report the US government loses between uh 200 billion and 500 billion to fraud every year to fraud up to half a trillion dollars to fraud every year are you kidding me to fraud every year what kind of fraud are we talking about anyway um Elon Musk made a comment that maybe Doge can do something about fixing that there has to be some kind of transparency change that can happen now I've been saying forever that the United States is doomed unless we fix this one part of our system you cannot have locals City officials deciding who gets what contracts as soon as you do that they all turn into criminals because it's just too easy to give it to your friend and take a bribe so I think the law needs to be changed somehow that there needs to be some either transparency or oversight or something but otherwise all local cities just attract criminals it's kind of like I say about um shoe salesman if if you see somebody who's a shoe salesman who's been working in the lady shoe sales department probably has a for fetish just saying follow the money Follow The Fetish well do you remember Dr uh Deborah Burks from the pandemic days of course you do she was a sort of a right-hand person to fouchy and she says she backs RFK Jr for Health and Human Services how about that and she hopes for transparency well here's my take I don't need and nobody needs your nomination your uh your backing Dr.

Burks Dr.

Burks is a backer of the drinking bleach hoax she was on the stage and listened to Trump very specifically talk about light as the disinfectant and can the light be brought into the body to be infectant which was being trialed at that time was literally being tested or being set up to test at that time and uh she allowed the media to say that he said how about drinking bleach and she never corrected that I I she's one of the people I just hate with a passion I just hate this lady because this was a big big up not just what you did maybe for Co that can be somebody else's problem to do that but she stood there and watched one of the biggest hoaxes in America being formed around her and never still has never figured out that trump bookended it with light he mentioned light then he talked about the light and then he made sure that you knew he was talking about the light at the end while the other ones were talking about something else I I can't forgive that Burks you need to do something about the drinking bleach ox and it's not good enough if you say he didn't use the word bleach because if you turn it into well he didn't mean bleach he meant some kind of liquid household disinfectant no he didn't nobody would say that he didn't say that he was very specific about what he was talking about light which by the way was tested on inserting it down the trachea and uh didn't work out so the trial was not a success but it was a perfectly smart question to ask can you do this inside a body so Trump had the smart question the experts were wrong and the experts went away and told you that that the smartest guy there the one who knew about light being tested inside bodies was really suggesting drinking bleach God I'm so mad at that Dr.

Burks you need to fix that and then you can get back on the right side while we're getting more trickles of information about Matt Gates and the ethics charges against them so here's what's coming out this doesn't mean it's true so these are allegations and uh Gates being a American citizen is what innocent until proven guilty so I'm going to treat him as innocent um and I want him to be the Attorney General um if all of these things are true I don't really care let me be as clear about that as I possibly can if every allegation that I tell you is true I don't care doesn't make any difference to me at all and you can't make me care you can't guilt me into it right now he may have some legal complications and it may affect his nomination unless it gets unless it's a recess appointment I guess but you can't make me care all right so here's the story um two women have testified in front of the house Ethics Committee that Gates paid them for sex and that's according to the attorney who represents them um they were in that very young range but they they were above 18 there is however one seeming there was one reported exception so there's one uh young woman who was 18 who said that she observed at some party she turned a corner and allegedly saw Matt Gates having sex with her friend who she had known for a long time so she would know the friend's age so the 18-year-old had a 17-year-old friend most of the people there probably were legal age but apparently there was one that wasn't and the reporting is that uh there's no reporting that gase would have known the woman's age so so nobody says he knew how old she was I believe I believe that nobody's making that claim so the possibility that he just assumed she was legal age or you know maybe should have asked and didn't but we don't have we don't have testimony that he knew we do have testimony that when he was told he immediately discontinued meaning not just that night but somebody had been seeing more than once so we know that as soon as he knew there was an age an age issue he stopped when she turned 18 reportedly it Recon continuu so that would show that he was sensitive to the age and when it was clear that he knew it he discontinued now is that an excuse if it sounds like I'm excusing any of his behavior that's not what's happening I'm just describing it just a description I'm not making a judgment call I'm just describing it and um apparently there's some uh venmo and maybe Pay.

Pal records that show that payments were given to some young women and that they say that those payments were for sex so let me let me add some uh reality to the world how many people who have as much money as gates gates comes from I think a wealthy family so he's got some resources how many how many rich people do you think have paid for sex except in sort of a girlfriendy situation not a not an actual necessarily a prostitute but somebody that they said you know if if somebody like Dan Bilzerian you know he's a famous um social media guy has lots of girlfriends if he were to pay one of his girlfriends to come and stay for the weekend and I'm not saying he does but let's just say he did would she assume he was paying for sex or would she assume that he was paying for a company and sex was assumed but it wasn't what he was paying for because there's a little bit of a mind reading element to it because he may be paying because they don't have money to travel so let's say you're a rich guy with a yacht and you know that if you offer somebody a few thousand dollars they will have the money to travel to you they'll be able to take some time off from their job because you paid them and you're both kind of thinking probably there's going to be some sex but then let's say that the young lady says no I'm not interested and then the rich guy in the Y says oh oh well I really thought we were on the same page on this but okay I mean I'm not a rapist so of course if you don't want you you don't want to and then maybe they don't get together again but here's the surprise maybe they do maybe she says no to sex and maybe he says you know what I really enjoyed hanging out with you so I'm going to pay you again same amount just as if there had been sex but this time we'll just hang out and if you ever change your mind then maybe something mutually exclusive you know mutually beneficial will happen but you know you don't have to here's some money the the the thing that's hard to understand at the non-rich person level is the degree to which rich people rich men transfer money to women that's just part of the travel and is more about the situation and whether or not their sex is actually a separate conversation now you might say to me Scott Scott Scott they both know it's for sex yes and no they both know that that's an intention but it doesn't mean that if the young lady said no that Matt Gates was going to force it or that he wouldn't pay what he said he was going to pay so in my opinion these are always consensual and it's not always about the money even if money was paid with sort of an overlying umbrella assumption that you know we're both kind of thinking in this direction because it's a separate decision the decision of whether you would accept money to be in the company of this person for a weekend is one decision and then the once you're there you're still a human being who can make a separate decision about what you want to do with your body right Matt Gates does not control anybody's body if they say no it's just no that's it so is that a case of paying for sex how how would you how do you rate that if if you know the money has that sort of intention behind it but it's not a decision there's an intention which is not illegal I don't think I don't think it's wrong to have an intention but the decision can still be completely separate because I'm sure that they weren't punished or sent home immediately if they said you know what I'm not feeling good tonight or this doesn't work for me now um every now and then I have to stop and say I'm not excusing anything he did I'm also not condemning it unless you know there was an underage part that has to be dealt with but you need to understand it in in the in the world of the you know the the yacht Jet Center people things are not like I bought a prostitute to have a sex and she left in an hour it's more like can you spend a week with me in the Bahamas and you're both just sort of thinking in the same direction I don't know so I guess I don't know even if the young ladies testified that the money was for sex was it because that could be an intention but not necessarily a decision you can separate them I don't know legally it looks like it's pretty uh pretty perilous so I'm not going to try to defend them I'm just going to say that these are these are never as clean as you think like these situations they always have all this gray area so who knows but if it's true that he didn't know the age of the young one and if it's true that um he just had a racy situation and money was part of it I don't care I really don't care at all do you because even the 17-year-old I hate to say this cuz I'll get in trouble for the but I don't believe she complained because remember their relationship continued after she was 18 so I think she had no complaints so if there's no victim in the classic sense except that somebody was technically under 18 um how much should I care can can I agree that some of this looks illegal and still not care I think I can because if you looked at the number of 17-year-old young women who had um a sexual relationship with somebody over 18 it's going to be a really large slice of America and we're not chasing all of them to ground and the reason is that we all have the same impression which is I wish you hadn't done that but let's not talk about it I mean that's how people feel about 17 most people anyway um celebrity endorsements don't work uh just the news is talking about this so that high-profile celebrities like Oprah and Beyonce and all that uh doesn't seem to have changed the vote according to I think the Center Square did some kind of um survey they found that 12% said celebrity endorsements made them less likely to vote for a candidate and 9% s said more likely now I think people are mostly lying in a poll like this I think the people say no those celebrities did not affect me because they don't want to look like an idiot who wasn't affected who whose vote was determined by Beyonce so even if your your vote was entirely determined by Beyonce if somebody asked you hey are you an idiot well I'm going to say no because if you admitted that your vote had been changed by you know the boss or Oprah you don't really sound like the smart one in the room so I wouldn't trust any answers that people gave to did those celebrity endorsements influenced me but clearly it did not win the day so I suspect uh I'm on the page with the Democrats have no idea what Americans are thinking thinking or feeling I mean sensationally so if they thought this that that in 2024 celebrities are what people were looking for for their political fixes where did they get that like who in the world thought that now I do think it's good for for both sides to have you know their share of celebrity endorsements so Trump had some too but um I I think what I think the way you should look at it is if they couldn't get any that might mean something but if you can get 10 it's not going to be that much different than if you had 20 or 100 right it would be something if you couldn't get any but if you can get some that's fine they both got some um apparently that Venezuelan gang trenda araga according to author ities have already set up or operations in 16 States according to Homeland Security um they have to go first that has to be really I would be happy if 100% of our border enforcement was concentrated on this like all of it and and I don't know how long it's going to take but I wouldn't concentrate on anything else not anything until you got all of these and that's going to take a while according to autism Capital which is an account on X um the difference in ideology between men and women is just huge now the political difference and it's in uh it's in a number of countries so it's not just an American phenomenon it's the same in Germany and some other countries so it used to be that male and female opinion sort of track together and now it just went and just went in opposite directions now I saw um a few different hypotheses on why this was Melissa Chen said on X that uh it's because of feminism and birth control pills now do birth control pills make you decide and act differently I believe so so that might be some of it I don't know um feminism does feminism make women do dumb things well it's a mixed bag some feminism is good some bad then nval ravikant had a separate idea he said the state can substitute for what women want from men but it can't substitute for what men want from women and that captures some of it does it capture all of it I don't know so could be that these are you know both in it that that there's something to both of those theories I'm going to add my own um what we see as this is the hypnotist frame so the difference between male and female uh in politics is fear fear because I've told you that the um the biggest persuasive variable is fear um you think that hunger is your biggest driver well not if a lion is running at you you got to get away from the lion even if you're really hungry right so fear beats everything if you can make somebody scared to death you can get them to do just about anything to get away from the fear so now imagine you've got uh the Democrat Party telling everybody that uh Hitler's coming and that you've got no bodily autonomy they're going to steal your democracy what do men hear when they hear that he's Hitler he's a fascist he's going to steal your bodily autonomy what do men say ah probably not some might say yes but it wouldn't feel like a direct risk to them so much um but women would say oh my God you know I'm going to lose birth control that's not going to happen I'm going to lose my bodily autonomy that's not going to happen but you could be afraid of it um and they may be a little less here here's a generalization I think this is a fair generalization they're probably more men who who pay attention to military stuff and can uh maybe interpret what's happening a little bit better because we just pay attention to it it's sort of a male thing so in the same way that I told you that the safest you've ever been from nuclear war is right now that that's a male perspective because I really look at these things all the time and it doesn't make me a genius but I pay attention whoever pays attention the most to any domain is going to have a little Advantage I pay attention to the military domain so when I say that this is the safest you've ever been I believe a lot of men probably say something like oh I get it well let me check how many men heard me say that this is literally the safest we could ever be because you just have to wait a few weeks and it goes away and everybody knows that how many of you said oh that's a good point and did anybody agree with that by the way it'd be good if some of you agreed with it but if you did not follow politics and you did not follow military stuff and the only thing you heard was that there was a talking had on MSNBC who says that something happened that moved us closer to nuclear war because I'm seeing social media people saying it's now 11:59 you know the last minute of human race because of this if that's all you heard it you'd be scared to death if somebody just told you yeah we we're attacking Russia and they threatened with nuclear war and that's all you knew how afraid would you be quite afraid so my hypothesis is that men are harder to scare we're just harder to scare but on top of that we also don't get abortions and we're not the ones having the babies so there's just some things we're not worried about so I think that it makes sense that since what we think is true about politics is usually a bunch of Lies when men hear the lies there supposed to scare them it doesn't scare them as much so they can stay on course when women here we're going to take your bodily autonomy and there's going to be a nuclear war if they're not really paying paying attention to the News That's the scariest you've ever heard in your life I mean that's some really really scary so they're going to vote against it it makes perfect sense so I I will add to uh the nval take which I think is valid that women are looking to the state for things that men used to provide you know the husband used to provide that's valid and I think that feminism and birth control certainly are changing the way thoughts are being formed so that's in the mix somewhere but I just think generally speaking men are less easy to to scare I think that's the big difference all right um I hate to even bring this up but I guess I have to so according to the Vigilant Fox there's a bombshell autopsy study now before I tell you what it says let me give you my opinion that there's no data that comes down about the pandemic or the covid that's credible some of it will be true some of it will not but I won't know which is credible and which isn't or which is true and which is so therefore it's not credible credible is different from true so I'm going to tell you what the story is but I'm also going to tell you personally might be true might not be so I'm I'm not a sold but I could be I could be later sold but I'm not sold yet but the report is that aut autopsies show that covid vaccines are the larger cause of death than even the the virus itself it's so it's a study that's been twice peer-reviewed so that means a lot right it's a study that was twice peer-reviewed okay let me explain peerreview does give you gives you no confidence whatsoever it does mean it's not so obviously stupid that it shouldn't be in the conversation it doesn't mean it's real peer review just looks as surfacy kind of things so if on the surface the there was nothing amazingly bad about it they say well it's peer-reviewed you'd have to duplicate it and make sure you knew your data was good before you could have confidence but here is the claim 74% of the deaths were were linked to the vaccination instead of the covid do I believe that no no I don't is it possible that is true yes yes it is is so this is The credibility thing I just don't believe any of the pandemic data or conclusions any of it it's just it's just so so filled with misinformation I wouldn't know what's real and what's not and peer review doesn't help me at all I'm sorry peer review gives me no confidence at all um of the covid vaccine related deaths sudden Cardiac Arrest died suddenly was the leading cause of deaths 35% of cases do I believe that no Noe but it's also possible I just don't believe it on the surface covid vaccine related deaths occurred rapidly uh averaging within two weeks basically and the majority happened within a week now that I believe that that sounds well I would say that's within the realm of possible because my understanding is when the vaccination first came out the expert said um if you're looking for how dangerous it is look for what happens in the first few weeks because uh overwhelmingly it's predictable that if it's going to kill people it's going to be kind of fast you know you don't look at you know there might still be longer term problems but most of the risk is that first two week period so um that's why although I did get the first to uh vaccinations that's why I waited so I waited six months I think six months after I was eligible and the reason I waited was first two weeks I want to see who dies I'm not going to be first in line month goes by I'm not sure I trust the data two months three months six months and it wasn't until I just really wanted to travel internationally that I decided it was time to take the risk but it makes sense that if there were injuries they would happen in the first two weeks more often than after all right but there's other research um again I have no idea how how believable this is but uh there's some study by let's see independent investigator John B senior highlighting findings by Kevin mccurnin a researcher from blah blah blah and they say the vaccines are causing turbo cancer basically and the Turbo cancers uh would grow more aggressively than typical ones and they would affect your lymph nodes and bone cancer specifically mentioned lymph nodes and bone cancer what do you think of that one well um it it doesn't seem to come with data so I think I'd have to see the data because cancer is the number one or number two killer so um and I think I think I saw number that half of all people get cancer have you ever heard that that half of adults will get cancer now a lot of it is treatable so they're not necessarily dying from it but half of them would get cancer so if half of people normally get cancer I don't know how well we could sort out you know what's caused by what so but again do I think this is credible no do I think it's false no idea but I don't believe anything that comes out of the pandemic or anything about the vaccination um am I concerned that it could be true yes I am I I may have more to tell you about that uh in the coming months but yeah I'm worried about it all right ladies and gentlemen those are my prepared remarks and hope I didn't miss anything but uh don't worry about nuclear war I got this I took care of it for you um I do worry about how we handle our all of our health care decisions in the future oh by the way uh if you want to hear the greatest irony at the same time that the vaccinations are being uh alleged and again I don't I don't believe the allegations I don't discount them but I don't have any way to know um at the same time that the vaccinations are being blamed for causing turbo cancer what would be the most ironic matching news what what news would go with that that would be so 2024 like the simulation here it is there there are increasing anecdotal these are still anecdotal stories of people who have um completely tamed their turbo cancer with iacon is that just perfect or what now do I do I know that icon works against cancer no I do not know that so I'm not making that claim I'm not your doctor don't take my word for anything it is true that there is there are an increasing number of anecdotal claims of somebody who was in stage four stage five had tried all the regular things none of them worked when on itin or there's another one like it um has some other name that's similar to I and uh and there are anecdotal cases of people who are still around who shouldn't be around so wouldn't that be the weirdest most perfect simulation that the ion of all the things in the world of all the things how could it be possible that that might be the solution to the extra or even any cancers that would be weird but since you live in a uh you live in some kind of a weird simulation obviously maybe you know one of the things that makes me think I live in a simulation is that I see people who appear to be um living a purchased experience be if you look at Trump's life doesn't he look like the life that somebody signed up and they paid a lot of money to experience what it would be like to be Trump for 80 years or however long he lives and and Elon Musk doesn't Elon musk's life look like literally an adventure he signed up for all right here's your adventure you're going to be the uh richest man on earth you're going to build electric cars batteries uh you're going to be helping the president uh yeah you'll be hanging out with the president pretty much every day um he'll be listening to you of course uh you'll be building a rocky ship to Mars to make us interplanetary now how in the world does that happen naturally it sounds exactly like a a pre-written path that somebody signed up for and now he's just enjoying the the path he went on take me for example um I have not had you know a problem free life but what are the odds that as six years old I knew I would be a famous cartoonist how did I know that how did I also know that I would spend lots of time talking to large audiences but not about cartooning necessarily and then here we are how did I know that was going to happen when I was a child did I make it happen because it was in my head you know how how did Tiger Woods know he was going to be a golfer at like two it feels like he signed up for that adventure and you know when I became a famous cartoonist it didn't seem real it just seemed like some Adventure I'd signed up for and suddenly everything just came to me in ways that I couldn't have predicted so if most of the world are NPCs but some of us are game players then um I may have at least one more Mission because I was thinking if I had signed up for this life and um and I it was sort of mapped out said all right at this age you're going to do this at this age you're going to solve this problem for some people at this age you'll help people lose weight or something weird things that I would never have predicted would be in my resume and then uh when you get to a certain age what I the adventure just ends I feel like I've got at least one good Adventure left in me and it's just sort of like tapping me on the shoulder now I know what it is but you don't know yet but man am I getting tapped on the shoulder hard so we'll find out I I feel like I'm going to find out for sure if this is a simulation because I'm I'm I'm on a path to trying something that if it works is going to blow your mind if it doesn't work well maybe I wasn't in a simulation after all but we'll see more on that later ladies and gentlemen I'm going to go talk to the people on locals privately because they're so awesome the rest of you I will see tomorrow those of you on X and Rumble and You.

Tube thanks for joining you and locals I'm coming at you in 30 seconds e e e e e e e e e e e e e

he little bit

mixed that's not that bad could be worse

let's call up the

comments because we got a show coming oh

my

goodness probably the best thing you've

ever seen

[Music]

good morning everybody and welcome to

the highlight of human civilization it's

called coffee with Scott Adams and I

don't think you'll ever have a better

time in your life but if you'd like to

take this experience up to levels that

nobody can even understand with their

tiny shiny human brains all you need for

that is a cuper muger glass of tanker

chel or Stein the canteen jugg or flask

of vessel of any kind fill it with your

favorite liquid I like coffee and join

me now for the unparallel pleasure the

dopamine end of the day the thing that

makes everything better it's called the

simultaneous zp and it

happens

now oh so

good I mean really sometimes it's so

good I can't even can't even stand

it well you'll be surprised to hear that

there's a new study that identified the

huge positive health effects of coffee

that's right apparently it's really good

for your gut bacteria gives you fiber oh

my goodness it can make you uh coffee

can make you levitate off the

ground um it will make you immortal and

possibly being able to fly long

distances by flapping your

arms okay none of that last stuff is

true but every day there's new

information about coffee and I wouldn't

rule it out it could be a fuel of the

future meanwhile a in the publication

pulse uh somebody wrote an article about

all the mental health benefits of

laughter huh so it turns out that

laughter which is a subset of being

happy is good for your health well they

could have saved some money by asking me

but some of the things they found is

that laughter reduces your Stress and

Anxiety don't you feel better already it

improves your mood and it combats

depression it enhances Your Sleep

Quality it improves your cognitive

function it builds your social

connections now that's a lot of good

stuff yeah so if you find yourself

laughing at any time during this

podcast you'll probably feel yourself

just getting healthier every

moment all right there's a Pennsylvania

School according ARS Technica had to

shut down because one clever student

figured out how to make deep fake um

nudes of the female

classmates and rather than making just

one he made 50

different he made 50 different deep

fakes of his of his female classmates 50

different ones now here's my question

was there really only one kid who knew

how to do it and so he did 50 of them or

is it at a point where they can all do

it because I wouldn't know how to do it

every AI that I know how to use wouldn't

do that if he want if he has it to so

there must be some kind of like secret

you know dark web deep deep fake AI that

if you knew what it was you could use it

now here's the

problem uh sure they can shut down that

one school

sure you could punish that one

person yep probably never do it again

but I was once

14 is is anybody here who was also a

14-year-old boy at any time in your life

have you ever been a 14-year-old

boy if I were a 14-year-old boy and you

handed me a tool that was free and could

turn anybody I wanted into a uh a

porn you couldn't pry that out my

14-year-old hands how in the world are

you going to stop

this I there's this is going to be to

Infinity this is

Unstoppable and kids are going to do

it so I don't know what you're going to

do about that I think I think the weird

horrible future is that every young

woman will have to just get used to

being in a porn that she wasn't in that

her deep fake was in I don't know I I

honestly I think there's literally zero

way to stop

it if there was an AI that could have

done it in the first place and that's

apparently out there and somebody has

access to

it doesn't look

good but anyway a robot dog you've seen

all the robot dogs uh one of them just

finished in South Korea uh finished a

marathon on one charge so with one

battery recharge a robot dog ran a

marathon so

calculating distance I would feel safe

living near a robot dog 10

miles

nope 15 miles too close too CL 26

miles not enough you get to get farther

than 26 miles away from your robot dog

if it's you know got a

weapon I for one do not trust robot dogs

pit bulls are looking good I might get a

pitbull to fight the robot

dogs um you've seen that more athletes

are doing the Trump

dance you know the Trump

dance it's the

danestone can do

it if I see a uh a little viral video on

Tik Tok or something and I I'll see the

young people doing these dances where it

looks like they're floating over the

floor and they're they're Moon walking

like crazy and they're you know they got

all kinds of things going on I look at

that and I say hey I could do

that if I spent the next year of my life

doing nothing but practicing that one

15-second dance but you show me the

Trump dance and I I look at that and I

go hold on people hold hold on there's a

dance I could learn pretty quickly so

let me see if I got

it is that it do I have it

yet I I think I'm close probably another

week or two of practice I could nail

that yeah so US soccer

Legend uh Christian pilic you all know I

mean obviously you're all huge fans of

American soccer so you would know you

would know the name of our best American

soccer players obviously so Christian

pilik very well known in America he did

the Trump dance after scoring so I I saw

a compilation clip a few times of the

various football players and other

athletes doing the Trump dance and even

uh one of the winners at the U

UFC

but do you think it's really

widespread because when you see on the

news and there's five instances of it

you think well this is everywhere but

there might be

five so I'm not I'm not quite ready to

say that it's safe to wear your magga

hat and and if you do the Maga dance in

front of your school on Talent night

you'll be perfectly fine because I don't

think you will I still think that hiding

might be your better

play for now

unless you're a famous athlete and then

you can do what you

want according to geeky gadgets open

AI um and Microsoft they're making this

gigantic new Improvement in in their AI

chat GPT and this is a big one because

they're going to give it near infinite

memory

capacity so if you're trading your AI

you can upload much larger documents but

it will remember it all which it doesn't

do now and if you um have a lot of

interactions with it it will remember

you basically

forever so you can build a little agent

um and this is the for me this is the

first

time it looks like it could be a real

product the AI that we've seen so far or

just for demonstrations and you know

maybe laugh here or there a deep fake

here or there maybe make a deep fake

your classmates but really not much of a

product however if you could build a an

agent that would remember everything it

ever learned and you could just train it

by talking to it and it would remember

everything he said apparently it can

also build its own skills so you could

train it to go out and acquire new

skills and it can sort of grow on its

own

now put it all together and what do you

have that's right we're getting closer

and closer to the scottbot where I take

my Consciousness and my personality and

I move it to a digital Forum to live

forever and no I'm not joking about this

at all I don't know if it'll be the chat

GPT

model but if chat GPT can do it I'm sure

that others can what I don't know if I

can do yet is imitate a person so I

don't think chat GPT yet can do a deep

fake because I need it to do all these

things it can do but also talk like me

and look like me I don't think it can do

that yet so maybe it'd have to be two

AIS working together or something like

that but

close well another news uh apparently

there's a weather event heading my way

let's see what's it called is it rain no

's see a storm no uh it's called a bomb

cyclone

that's right a bomb Cyclone is heading

for me Northern California but I'm I'm

I'm at the I'm at one border of what

it's going to hit now I don't have to

tell you that I'm not too happy about a

bomb Cyclone heading my way sometime

today

but if if I I'll tell you if I walk the

dog I'm not going to let go of the uh

the leash because I've got a feeling my

dog's going to be like a kite I'm just

be walking around dog will be floating

ahead of

me all

right um so today is the day that judge

Maran uh rules something about

Trump I get all the law fares confused

which one is Marshon is he

the he's doing which

trial tell me which one he is I don't

care yeah so the question I was asked is

do you think judge Maran will delay

whatever he's doing or drop the case

whatever he's doing I forget which one

he's on and I've did I think my answer

is he'll do whatever is bad for

Trump that's my answer if if he has any

path that's bad for Trump but also

somewhat realistically within the bounds

of things he should be doing he'll do

that I think that you'll just see

something that's

whatever is the most negative thing he

can do under the circumstances so I

don't know what that would be but look

for it here's what I don't expect oh

okay you're president now this just

needs to go away I don't expect that

maybe maybe or maybe it'll be postponed

until after he's president or something

but I can't imagine they would take the

risk away from him

completely because I think they just

hate him so they would want him to twist

as much as he

can so I looked into a little bit the uh

Trump's pick for Energy

Secretary his name is

Wright and uh I like it according to the

verge did a little right up on him so

apparently the energy

secretary is an entrepreneur who has

made a ton of money and his company does

like 10% of the

fracking uh or 10% of the oil I guess in

the US so he's knows everything about

fracking which is good but here's the

best part he also seems to be way up on

geothermal because his company also

invests in

geothermal and nuclear so he's got

investments in a in a nuclear power

plant that Sam alman's involved with as

well

so uh and and then he also says that

climate change is not a crisis he

doesn't say humans are not warming the

Earth he just says it's not a crisis now

that's kind of

perfect I don't know if I could be

happier honestly because the thing you

worry about in

energy but by the way let me say this

clearly there are some jobs where I

think you absolutely need experience in

the domain this is one of them I think

the Energy Secretary should know

something about fracking something about

geothermal and something about nuclear

and ideally solar too although I think

that's a little easier to

understand so not bad I'd be pretty

happy with somebody who has that much

knowledge I don't think that's as

important in even jobs like

defense uh I I think I think they're a

general or or generic very smart person

who's got the right intentions could do

fine there's lots of examples of

that um I saw on this maybe you saw this

on Joe Rogan show he was talking to uh

special forces veteran FN haer haer or

haer AER haer anyway he's one of the

founders of Black Rifle coffee I think

and he was talking about with his own

experience as a special forces guy he

says if we declare war on the cartel

which is something Trump said you do uh

these dudes are not going to understand

what the f is going on they are in for a

world of ultra violence that they've

never actually felt before they have

they have effing no clue if we organize

these tier one units against them uh

what I would be doing if I were down

there I'd be getting ready to retire

right now because if Delta Force is

hunting me bro I would be so

terrified now is that hyperbole because

it seem to me the cartels uh are quite

quite aware of what violence looks like

but mostly they're doing it out so if

some came to

them uh from something other than a

competing cartel which of course they

have some violence from I don't

know do how many of you think that the

cartel would try to bring the pain to

main to Mainland America to see if they

could get Delta Force or something off

their back

here's what I would suggest if I could

give some advice to the

cartels if we come after you with the

military it's going to be devastating to

you if you attack the United States

citizens let's say do some terrorist

attack because you're trying to take the

pressure off it's going to be way

worse because if you think we're pissed

off

now just to a terrorist attack on

mainland United States and then we're

and then we' take it to the ground we'll

do whatever it takes just

one have you seen the United States we

only need one attack against us and

we'll just go crazy have you heard of

911 we spent a trillion dollars after

911 yeah so if anybody from the cartel

is

listening if the Special Forces come

after you you need to immediately

try to make a deal either leave the

country or try to make a deal but don't

attack American citizens

because that's not going to work out for

you at all not even a little bit will

that work out so I can promise you that

so I don't know if this is going to

happen I do worry that Trump will get

the talk you know where the Special

Forces boss comes in and says you

know we kind of have an arrangement with

the cartel

I think that's what's going to

happen so if I had to predict I would

predict that we will not use special

forces against the

cartels I hate to say it but that's my

prediction

um Thomas Massie and a lot of other

people warning about uh the new

aggression that Ukraine is showing

toward

Russia and Biden has authorized these

long range strikes of these long- range

missiles that we provided to Ukraine and

that authorized the use of them within

Russia itself which Russia says the

Kremlin says that means the United

States or well NATO that means that NATO

is at war with Russia and they will act

accordingly uh oh now you're worried

about nuclear

war and you're worried about this

getting on a hand some have suggested

that the reason that Biden authorized

this so soon um before you know or so

close to the switch over of power that

his real intention is to handcuff Trump

and make sure Trump can't come in and

solve a war on day one that Biden

couldn't

solve so do you believe that do do you

believe that any part of Biden's

intention is to make Trump fail at

making

peace I don't think I don't think so

because I think this works in Trump's

favor the the closer you get to complete

destruction of both countries or all

countries

involved the closer you are to

peace unfortunately that's just the way

it works there's no other if you don't

have the threat of you know you're

definitely going to be dead if you keep

on this path like not any question about

it 100% you're going to be dead that's

when people get flexible if they think

they're not going to be dead they might

act that way but uh yeah we need to be

at the point where serious people are

afraid of nuclear war that's how you get

peace but would you like me to make sure

that there's no nuclear

war is there anybody who would like to

ask me to guarantee

that there's no nuclear war between

Russia and NATO and the

US I'm willing to do it I can do it

right now if you like all

right and all we really need is a

blanket some of you will understand

this some of you will

not those who understand will have to

explain it to those who

don't but here's how we avoid nuclear

war

Russia you know you don't want nuclear

war with the United States it's

literally the last thing you

want Ukraine you know you don't want

nuclear war it's the last thing you want

NATO

us you don't want nuclear war it's the

last thing you want do you know what all

of you do want you want the big dog to

get off the porch you want January 20th

to

come and you want to look as Fierce and

dangerous as you can be so that when you

walk into those negotiations you have

maximum

leverage and

then the big dog's going to make a

piece and you're going to accept

it you're going to complain like crazy

but you're going to accept it so Russia

and NATO your two choices are this

nuclear destruction of all of

civilization or wait a few weeks and

everything will be

fine which of those two choices sounds

better to

you complete nuclear destruction of

civilization before we even get to

Mars or how about we just work it out on

around January 20th 21st something like

that now given that every smart person

in the world believes that a negotiated

peace is now not only possible but

guaranteed and we know that Putin

as tough and mean as he can be some say

evil but I'll tell you what nobody

accuses Vladimir Putin of being

irrational nope not once

he's not an irrational guy do you know

what Trump is not

irrational you you can hate his policies

you can hate anything he says his posts

blah blah he's not

irrational he's very very

transactional and so is

Putin so you've got the two most

transactional leaders the strongest ones

the ones who can get what they want

because they have enough clout in their

own land to do it they both want peace

they want a

lot and of course it's going to happen

so here's what you need to know if

you're

worried we have the lowest chance of

nuclear war with Russia right now

between now and you know January mid

January it's the lowest risk of nuclear

war it'll never be lower than this it's

close to zero and the reason is that

100% of the people involved can see that

simply

waiting is almost guaranteed to work

whereas using a nuke is basically

death we've never seen choices this

clear so could something accidental

happen well I

suppose but in terms of intentional

nuclear war it's the lowest risk in your

lifetime because it would be the only

time that there's no argument for a

nuclear war the next few weeks none a

few missiles go into Russia sorry that's

not even close that's not even close to

a nuclear

war it would be maybe if it were closer

to the beginning of the war or look like

Russia couldn't win you know maybe if

things were different it would be

dangerous but in our current exact

situation you have the lowest risk of

nuclear war you you've ever experienced

in your life nobody wants

it and and and I think that both sides

are

probably one assumes or at least one

hopes

probably both sides are giving a little

extra attention to making sure there's

nothing accidental that happens because

an accidental any kind of accidental

alert um that would make one side

spooked would be the worst thing you

could do so they probably have also the

most attention they've ever given

to making sure there's no accidental

thing I would imagine that they're

testing the the red phone every 5

minutes is that still a thing is there

still like literally a phone you can

pick up in the White House and and

Putin's going to be pretty close to

picking it

up yeah they're going to make sure that

we have a direct line of communication

that there's no delay and if somebody

gets a false signal one way or the other

you want to be able to call and say did

you just send a new car way and we need

to say no or whatever vice versa so

we'll be fine it's actually the last

thing I'd worry about today it's not

even on my list of things to think about

you will be

fine but it but the only reason you'll

be fine is that all the reasonable

people are up in arms right if you just

sort of ignored it that would be the

wrong thing but being super alert to how

big a deal this is is good that's where

you want to be that's where we

are all right um the Gateway Punda says

that uh people in the doj and FBI at

least the officials are hiring their own

criminal defense lawyers ahead of

Trump's return now how often have you

hired a criminal defense lawyer when

nobody has even accuse you of a

crime have you ever done that well

nobody's accused ACC me of a crime and

as far as I know I haven't committed any

but you know I think I'd better get

myself a criminal defense lawyer well

some of them might be genuinely innocent

of all crimes and maybe just worried but

it sure looks guilty doesn't it now

they're all innocent until proven guilty

so that the standard is Innocent

but if it's really true that they're ler

lawyering up I feel that on some level

they

think that there's a real

risk on some level I think a lot of

people know they were part of a

conspiracy and I don't know if they know

if that conspiracy was legal or not

because let's say let's say there was

enough evidence for a

RICO uh Rico

prosecution and it could be in several

domains because the the Democrats and

you know everything from the military to

the

mainstream

press and the intelligence people they

seem to coordinate on a lot of stuff so

at what point does the

coordination if the outcome is something

illegal hypothetically at what point

does the coordination toward that one

outcome that's

illegal become

Rico so you can see a situation where

somebody just took a meeting or took a

phone call and they were sort of in on

the plot but maybe not not super

actively you know they were just sort of

part of the conversation and maybe

didn't do something to stop it are they

part of the RICO can you go to jail for

being part of the conversation because

the the whole Rico is that it's a

coordinated group planned activity if

you're part of the people who are

plotting even if you didn't do the

action but the people who did the action

met with you and got some advice and you

said well I'm not going to stop you are

you guilty I have no

idea so I want to say again as I'll say

this many times because I think the more

I say it the better I'm completely

opposed to any Trump

lawfare if I see even a even the scent

of it I'm going to go nuts because we

didn't go through all this work just to

put a bunch of in charge right

we didn't fight this hard to get rid of

law fair just to do our own law

fair that's that's no go you better have

really really good evidence of a crime

you know the way it should be you should

have really good evidence of a crime and

I wouldn't go looking for it if there's

not anything that's you know somewhat on

the surface so no we I am absolutely not

okay with lawfare as any kind of Revenge

and and believe me I feel like I've been

a victim of coordinated

activities my cancellation I don't think

happened just all in a vacuum yeah I'm

pretty sure that was part of the larger

you know Democrat political strategy to

cancel everybody they

can but even

then I don't I don't want anybody who

didn't break a law to go to jail I want

zero of

that all right so they got their

lawyers uh as Mike stovich says what on

a post on De he said what Democrats did

in Pennsylvania gives Credence to 2020

stolen election

claims future claims will be informed by

what we all just saw stolen election

deniers uh oh we'll call them stolen

election deniers not election deniers as

we shall call them now carry the burden

of proof so what he's talking about is

that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court told

the election board to stop counting

illegal votes an illegal vote would be

one that has let's say um a non-matching

signature or there's something irregular

about it that makes it

uncountable

um but the election

board decided to just ignore the core

order and just keep counting them now

somebody said that it wouldn't be

possible to easily back back out the

ones that are

miscounted because maybe they're not

separately keeping track for the ones

that are illegal in case there's a you

know motion to remove exactly those

illegal ones but nothing else if they

can't tell which ones are illegal and

which ones are legal when they're done

counting what's your recourse then an

audit and then you just still don't have

an answer about who's the senator it

goes on for months um I don't know but

to me I'm I'm going to agree with

cernovich on his take that watching the

Supreme Court tell them to stop counting

illegal votes and then watching the

election board try to do it anyway

certainly suggests that rigging is

normal me meaning that this doesn't look

like something that somebody came up

with that they never thought of before

it just has that feeling like you kind

of did that a little naturally

they just kept counting and they kept

finding all these

votes well I personally have no proof

that uh Pennsylvania is going to end up

doing something illegal but we do know

they're violating the order of the

Supreme Court in

Pennsylvania

so do you go as far as I do and say that

cernovich is right that just watching

this tells you that 2020 was probably

crooked anyway um there are now six

Democrat leaders at least to say they

will not comply with Trump's new

government immigration enforcement so

you've got the Arizona governor Illinois

governor Colorado governor Massachusetts

governor and also the mayors of Chicago

and Boston which are obviously in two of

those States so you've got four

states they have some leaders saying

that they're going to

resist

immigration

um

enforcement and my question is this how

much can they how much can they

interfere before they go to

jail what exactly does it look like when

they

interfere they interfere on what

level now it'd be one thing if they tell

their local police you know don't talk

to the feds

that wouldn't be surprising and maybe

that's

legal maybe that's okay I mean not okay

but maybe it's not technically illegal

but what else would they do suppose they

tried to hide them suppose the

government got involved in hiding

illegal immigrants of the kind that we'

want to

deport don't you go to jail for that

like at what point is this just jailable

offense that you're not going to let the

government do the thing that the

government is tasked with doing

defending the

country I guess we'll find out meanwhile

the the uh stock of alphabet you know

the owner of Google and more uh is down

pre-market anyway because people think

that the Trump doj will push for Google

to sell off its Chrome browser to break

its

Monopoly what do you

think do you think that Google's going

to get broken up by uh Trump

officials I don't

know it are Republicans typically the

the the Monopoly

Busters what's the history of Monopoly

busting has that been more on the left

or more on the right it's been on the

left hasn't

it so but in this case Google looks like

an enemy to um

democracy so that I think the

Republicans might look at this as less

of a monopoly problem and more of a um

disinformation problem meaning that if

Google can control what you see they can

control the election now do you remember

the

uh do you remember was it Dr Epstein I

think who said that Google could change

an election by quite a few points what

would happen if Google had not been

influencing the election and mainstream

media had not been trying to influence

the election and the fake polls had not

been trying to influence the

election how much would it how much

could Trump have won by if you took

those you know those biasing factors out

I don't know maybe

more I'll tell you the thing that is

surprising me the most is that Democrats

are confessing

failure and I'm wondering if that's

because they don't have current

leadership

if they had leadership wouldn't they be

selling a narrative

instead so if there was somebody who

could say hey Democrats I am your leader

uh you should give this messaging and

they'd say something like uh well the

election was actually kind of close if

you look at you know the 70 some million

versus 70 some million is kind of

close and but you're not seeing that so

much you're actually seeing Democrats

saying we got we got our asses kicked we

lost as bad as you can lose we better

look at what we're doing to see if it's

wrong I've never seen this I've never

seen anything like that before now why

do you think it is that they're

accepting I think it's the lack of

leadership isn't it because if they had

a leader the leader would be telling

them to to hang tight stay strong don't

admit any

mistakes um kind of immediately regroup

but there's nothing like that happening

that they are just floundering and

flapping around and and every day that I

think that I will be done enjoying how

much they don't understand why they lost

I'm surprised because once again another

full day of being entertained by

democrats who try to explain to

themselves and to others why they didn't

win and they're not even close they they

they just don't seem to understand

really anything it's like they have been

around for the last eight years or

something like they just landed on the

planet it's kind of weird now the reason

of course is that their information Silo

was completely fake and has been fake

for probably a decade at least if not

forever so they had no idea what reality

looked like imagine can you imagine the

size of the mind if you thought

that the Trump supporters were a

minority of the country and like a a

really serious minority and then you

found out that they literally

outnumbered you and that all the the

Hitler blaming and the the fascist stuff

and the deplorable stuff didn't make any

difference like imagine waking up to

that and your your whole reality is

upside down now because you don't know

if you're one of the bad

guys and I have some bad news for you

Democrats I don't mean this as just like

a like a throwaway comment

insult you have been the bad

guys I don't think it's all

intentionally like uh on

purpose I believe that the the uh media

information landscape was so distorted

by a few bad actors that you honestly

thought the world was a different place

than what it is and then you acted

accordingly now I think that Democrats

in in the information bubble that they

were in were acting for the the greatest

good that's what it looks like to me it

looks like their intentions were

entirely based on the greater good and

if you listen to them talk that's the

way they talked you know this is good

for this group it's good for that group

now of course it wasn't for the greater

good it was destroying America but they

didn't

know they they thought things were going

swimmingly because the news that they

watched said this Joe Biden thing's got

everything under control his brain is

working perfectly and if anything ever

went wrong God we're lucky we've got KLA

Harris the highly qualified vice

president to take over immediately If

Ever Needed none of that was ever true

not I don't think

anything probably almost

nothing that was an official claim of

the news or the media was true almost

nothing

now there's fake news on both sides

obviously it's not limited to one side

but the extent of

it uh I think was unparalleled I think

the Democrats broke some new kind of

record for fooling

themselves um what else we got

here so now axios and you're seeing a

little grumbling from Democrats saying

that uh if if there are millions of

deported undocumented immigrants

if Trump goes ahead with it it will

create gigantic negative effects in the

economy meaning that the people who need

to pick the crops and do the work

they're not going to have enough workers

and it will be a 6.8% drop in the

national

GDP all right do you believe that here's

what I

think

um I I never have any resp respect for

the critics Who start with okay assume

you do everything the stupid

way and then then I want to say wait

wait wait wait stop talking no no we

need to we need to discuss what's going

to happen Okay but your assumption was

that I was going to do a thing that

could easily be done the smart way but

you're saying let's start with the

assumption that you do it the stupidest

possible way yeah yeah yeah let's do

that so let's talk about tariffs and

we're going to put 100% tariffs on

everything wait wait wait wait wait no

tariffs are a negotiating tool so I'm

not going to accept your assumption that

we' use them in the stupid as possible

way which is put it on everything

without thinking about it we might do a

strategically we might try to protect an

industry we might say we're going to do

comprehensive tariffs just as a

negotiating tool but don't assume that

we're going to do a smart thing that

could easily be done the smart way and

people have done it the Smart Way

forever the Trump will be the only one

who will do it the dumb way so here's

how you do immigration the dumb way the

dumb way would be on day

one uh go get all the Farm

Workers I mean

seriously do you think that the U border

the border patrol and ice and the th

those people do you think they have

enough resources to start with the Farm

Workers

and that they would and that that would

make any sense at all to anybody like

who would agree with that there isn't a

person in the world who would do that

now could you imagine that Trump starts

with the criminals and maybe people who

came in in the last few months yes

easily of course I can imagine that so

why would you make the assumption that

he would do the dumbest thing you could

possibly do which is get rid of the

undocumented migrants who are already

adding to the

GDP now over

time you could imagine that the

undocumented migrants picking crops that

honestly we're not going to get

Americans to do that uh you could

imagine that they slowly get replaced

with documented people or their own

status gets you know upgraded so that

hey you're you're a good seasonal worker

there's no reason not to let you in

because you show that as soon as the

crops are picked you go back home you

share your money we have no problem with

that so you could imagine that the

undocumented Farm Workers which are

necessary would over time get

transformed into a legal group of people

that may or may not come from other

countries but we're not gon to we're not

going to starve the country by rounding

up rounding up the crop

Pickers don't assume that we just start

stupid and stay that way I'm not going

to have that conversation but that's the

one that's what the

uh uh the Democrats are trying to make

you think past the sale the sale is that

Trump is going to do the dumbest

possible

deportation no I do not accept that he

would do the dumbest possible

deportation I will only accept that he

would get rid of the criminals and maybe

the most recent arrivals first and if we

could ever get to the end of that pile

which I don't think we can well then

maybe you look at some other stuff but

but we would do it

smartly

um yeah

anyway according to uh one report the US

government loses between

uh 200 billion and 500 billion to fraud

every

year to

fraud up to half a trillion

dollars to

fraud every year

are you kidding me to fraud every year

what kind of fraud are we talking about

anyway um Elon Musk made a comment that

maybe Doge can do something about fixing

that there has to be some kind

of

transparency change that can happen now

I've been saying forever that the United

States is doomed unless we fix this one

part of our system you cannot have

locals City officials deciding who gets

what

contracts as soon as you do that they

all turn into criminals because it's

just too easy to give it to your friend

and take a bribe so I think the law

needs to be changed somehow that there

needs to be some either transparency or

oversight or something but otherwise all

local cities just attract

criminals it's kind of like I say about

um shoe

salesman if if you see somebody who's a

shoe salesman who's been working in the

lady shoe sales

department probably has a for

fetish just saying follow the money

Follow The

Fetish well do you remember Dr uh

Deborah

Burks from the pandemic days of course

you do she was a sort of a right-hand

person to fouchy and she says she backs

RFK Jr for Health and Human

Services how about that and she hopes

for

transparency well here's my take I don't

need and nobody needs your nomination

your uh your backing Dr Burks Dr Burks

is a backer of the drinking bleach hoax

she was on the stage and listened to

Trump very specifically talk about light

as the disinfectant and can the light be

brought into the body to be infectant

which was being trialed at that time was

literally being tested or being set up

to test at that time and uh she allowed

the media to say that he said how about

drinking bleach and she never

corrected that

I I she's one of the people I just

hate with a passion I just hate

this lady because this was a big big

up not just what you did maybe for

Co that can be somebody else's problem

to do that but she stood there and

watched one of the biggest hoaxes in

America being formed around her and

never still has never figured out that

trump bookended it with light he

mentioned light then he talked about the

light and then he made sure that you

knew he was talking about the light at

the end while the other ones were

talking about something

else I I can't forgive that

Burks you need to do something about the

drinking bleach ox and it's not good

enough if you say he didn't use the word

bleach because if you turn it into well

he didn't mean bleach he meant some kind

of liquid household disinfectant no he

didn't nobody would say that he didn't

say that he was very specific about what

he was talking about

light which by the way was tested on

inserting it down the trachea and uh

didn't work out so the trial was not a

success but it was a perfectly smart

question to ask can you do this inside a

body so Trump had the smart question the

experts were wrong and the experts went

away and told you that that the smartest

guy there the one who knew about light

being tested inside bodies was really

suggesting drinking

bleach God I'm so mad at

that Dr Burks you need to fix that and

then you can get back on the right

side while we're getting more trickles

of information about Matt Gates and the

ethics charges against them so here's

what's coming out this doesn't mean it's

true so these are

allegations and uh Gates being a

American citizen is what innocent until

proven guilty so I'm going to treat him

as innocent

um and I want him to be the Attorney

General um if all of these things are

true I don't really

care let me be as clear about that as I

possibly can if every allegation that I

tell you is true I don't care doesn't

make any difference to me at

all and you can't make me care you can't

guilt me into it right now he may have

some legal

complications and it may affect his

nomination unless it gets unless it's a

recess appointment I guess

but you can't make me care all right so

here's the

story um two women have testified in

front of the house Ethics Committee that

Gates paid them for sex and that's

according to the attorney who represents

them um they were in that very young

range but they they were above 18 there

is however one seeming there was one

reported exception so there's one uh

young woman who was

18 who said that she observed at some

party she turned a corner and allegedly

saw Matt Gates having sex with her

friend who she had known for a long time

so she would know the friend's age so

the 18-year-old had a 17-year-old

friend most of the people there probably

were legal

age but apparently there was one that

wasn't and the reporting is that uh

there's no reporting that gase would

have known the woman's age so so nobody

says he knew how old she was I believe I

believe that nobody's making that

claim so the possibility that he just

assumed she was legal age or you know

maybe should have asked and didn't but

we don't have we don't have testimony

that he knew we do have testimony that

when he was told he immediately

discontinued meaning not just that night

but somebody had been seeing more than

once so we know that as soon as he knew

there was an age an age issue he stopped

when she turned 18 reportedly it Recon

continuu so that would show that he was

sensitive to the age and when it was

clear that he knew it

he

discontinued now is that an excuse if it

sounds like I'm excusing any of his

behavior that's not what's happening I'm

just describing it just a description

I'm not making a judgment call I'm just

describing

it and um apparently there's some uh

venmo and maybe PayPal records that show

that payments were given to some young

women and that they say that those

payments were for

sex

so let me let me add some uh reality to

the world how many people who have as

much money as gates gates comes from I

think a wealthy family so he's got some

resources how many how many rich people

do you think have paid for

sex except in sort of a girlfriendy

situation not a not an actual

necessarily a prostitute but somebody

that they said you know if if somebody

like Dan Bilzerian you know he's a

famous um social media guy has lots of

girlfriends if he were to pay one of his

girlfriends to come and stay for the

weekend and I'm not saying he does but

let's just say he did would she assume

he was paying for

sex or would she assume that he was

paying for a company and sex was assumed

but it wasn't what he was paying

for because there's a little bit of a

mind reading element to

it because he may be paying because they

don't have money to travel so let's say

you're a rich guy with a

yacht and you know that if you offer

somebody a few thousand dollars they

will have the money to travel to you

they'll be able to take some time off

from their job because you paid them and

you're both kind of thinking probably

there's going to be some sex but then

let's say that the young lady says no

I'm not interested and then the rich guy

in the Y says oh oh well I really

thought we were on the same page on this

but okay I mean I'm not a rapist so of

course if you don't want you you don't

want to and then maybe they don't get

together again but here's the surprise

maybe they do

maybe she says no to sex and maybe he

says you know what I really enjoyed

hanging out with you so I'm going to pay

you again same amount just as if there

had been sex but this time we'll just

hang out and if you ever change your

mind then maybe something mutually

exclusive you know mutually beneficial

will happen but you know you don't have

to here's some money the the the thing

that's hard to understand at the

non-rich person level

is the degree to which rich

people rich men transfer money to women

that's just part of the travel and is

more about the

situation and whether or not their sex

is actually a separate

conversation now you might say to me

Scott Scott Scott they both know it's

for

sex yes and no they both know that

that's an intention

but it doesn't mean that if the young

lady said no that Matt Gates was going

to force it or that he wouldn't pay what

he said he was going to pay so in my

opinion these are always consensual and

it's not always about the money even if

money was paid with sort of an overlying

umbrella assumption that you know we're

both kind of thinking in this direction

because it's a separate

decision the decision of whether you

would accept money to be in the company

of this person for a weekend is one

decision and then the once you're there

you're still a human being who can make

a separate decision about what you want

to do with your body right Matt Gates

does not control anybody's body if they

say

no it's just no that's it so is that a

case of paying for

sex how how would you how do you rate

that if if you know the money has that

sort of intention behind it but it's not

a

decision there's an

intention which is not illegal I don't

think I don't think it's wrong to have

an intention but the decision can still

be completely separate because I'm sure

that they weren't punished or sent home

immediately if they said you know what

I'm not feeling good tonight or this

doesn't work for

me now um every now and then I have to

stop and say I'm not excusing anything

he

did I'm also not condemning it unless

you know there was an underage part that

has to be dealt

with but you need to understand it in in

the in the world of the you know the the

yacht Jet Center people things are not

like I bought a prostitute to have a sex

and she left in an hour it's more like

can you spend a week with me in the

Bahamas

and you're both just sort of thinking in

the same direction I don't know so I

guess I don't know even if the young

ladies testified that the money was for

sex was

it because that could be an

intention but not necessarily a

decision you can separate

them I don't know legally it looks like

it's pretty uh pretty perilous so I'm

not going to try to defend them I'm just

going to say that these are these are

never as clean as you think like these

situations they always have all this

gray area so who

knows but if it's true that he didn't

know the age of the young one and if

it's true that um he just had a racy

situation and money was part of it I

don't care I really don't care at all do

you because even the 17-year-old I hate

to say this cuz I'll get in trouble for

the

but I don't believe she complained

because remember their relationship

continued after she was 18 so I think

she had no

complaints so if there's no victim in

the classic sense except that somebody

was technically under

18 um how much should I

care can can I agree that some of this

looks illegal and still not

care I think I

can because if you looked at the number

of

17-year-old young women who had um a

sexual relationship with somebody over

18 it's going to be a really large slice

of America and we're not chasing all of

them to ground and the reason is that we

all have the same impression which is I

wish you hadn't done that but let's not

talk about it I mean that's how people

feel about

17 most

people anyway

um celebrity endorsements don't

work uh just the news is talking about

this so that high-profile celebrities

like Oprah and Beyonce and all that uh

doesn't seem to have changed the vote

according to I think the Center Square

did some kind of um survey they found

that 12% said celebrity endorsements

made them less likely to vote for a

candidate and 9% s said more likely now

I think people are mostly lying in a

poll like this I think the people say no

those celebrities did not affect me

because they don't want to look like an

idiot who wasn't affected who whose vote

was determined by

Beyonce so even if your your vote was

entirely determined by Beyonce if

somebody asked you hey are you an

idiot well I'm going to say

no because if you admitted that your

vote had been changed by you know the

boss or

Oprah you don't really sound like the

smart one in the room so I wouldn't

trust any answers that people gave to

did those celebrity endorsements

influenced me but clearly it did not win

the

day so I suspect uh I'm on the page with

the Democrats have no

idea what Americans are thinking

thinking or feeling I mean sensationally

so if they thought this that that in

2024

celebrities are what people were looking

for for their political

fixes where did they get that like who

in the world thought that now I do think

it's good for for both sides to have you

know their share of celebrity

endorsements so Trump had some too but

um I I think what I think the way you

should look at it is if they couldn't

get any that might mean something but if

you can get 10 it's not going to be that

much different than if you had 20 or 100

right it would be something if you

couldn't get

any but if you can get some that's

fine they both got

some um apparently that Venezuelan gang

trenda

araga according to author ities have

already set up or operations in 16

States according to Homeland

Security um they have to go

first that has to be

really I would be happy if 100% of our

border enforcement was concentrated on

this like all of it and and I don't know

how long it's going to take but I

wouldn't concentrate on anything else

not anything until you got all of these

and that's going to take a

while according to autism Capital which

is an account on X

um the difference in ideology between

men and women is just huge now the

political difference and it's in uh it's

in a number of countries so it's not

just an American phenomenon it's the

same in Germany and some other countries

so it used to be that male and female

opinion sort of track together

and now it just

went and just went in opposite

directions now I saw um a few different

hypotheses on why this was Melissa Chen

said on X that uh it's because of

feminism and birth control

pills now do birth control pills make

you decide and act differently I believe

so so that might be some of it I don't

know um feminism does feminism make

women do dumb

things well it's a mixed bag some

feminism is good some

bad then nval ravikant had a separate

idea he said the state can substitute

for what women want from men but it

can't substitute for what men want from

women and that captures some of it does

it capture all of it I don't know so

could be that these are you know both in

it that that there's something to both

of those theories I'm going to add my

own um what we see as this is the

hypnotist frame so the difference

between male and female uh in

politics is

fear fear because I've told you that the

um the biggest persuasive variable is

fear um you think that hunger is your

biggest driver well not if a lion is

running at you you got to get away from

the lion even if you're really hungry

right so fear beats everything if you

can make somebody scared to death you

can get them to do just about anything

to get away from the

fear so now imagine you've got uh the

Democrat

Party telling everybody that uh Hitler's

coming and that you've got no bodily

autonomy they're going to steal your

democracy what do men hear when they

hear that he's Hitler he's a fascist

he's going to steal your bodily autonomy

what do men say ah probably

not some might say

yes but it wouldn't feel like a direct

risk to them so

much um but women would say oh my God

you know I'm going to lose birth control

that's not going to happen I'm going to

lose my bodily autonomy that's not going

to happen but you could be afraid of it

um and they may be a little

less here here's a generalization I

think this is a fair generalization

they're probably more men who who pay

attention to military

stuff and can uh maybe interpret what's

happening a little bit better because we

just pay attention to it it's sort of a

male thing so in the same way that I

told you that the safest you've ever

been from nuclear war is right

now that that's a male perspective

because I really look at these things

all the time and it doesn't make me a

genius but I pay attention whoever pays

attention the most to any domain is

going to have a little Advantage I pay

attention to the military domain so when

I say that this is the safest you've

ever been I believe a lot of men

probably say something like oh I get

it well let me check how many men heard

me say that this is literally the safest

we could ever be because you just have

to wait a few weeks and it goes away and

everybody knows that how many of you

said oh that's a good

point

and did anybody agree with that by the

way it'd be good if some of you agreed

with it but if you did not follow

politics and you did not

follow military

stuff and the only thing you heard was

that there was a talking had on MSNBC

who says that something happened that

moved us closer to nuclear war because

I'm seeing social media people saying

it's now

11:59 you know the last minute of human

race because of this if that's all you

heard it you'd be scared to

death if somebody just told you yeah we

we're attacking Russia and they

threatened with nuclear war and that's

all you knew how afraid would you be

quite afraid so my hypothesis is that

men are harder to

scare we're just harder to scare but on

top of that we also don't get abortions

and we're not the ones having the babies

so there's just some things we're not

worried about so I think that it makes

sense that since what we think is true

about politics is usually a bunch of

Lies when men hear the lies there

supposed to scare them it doesn't scare

them as much so they can stay on course

when women here we're going to take your

bodily autonomy and there's going to be

a nuclear war if they're not really

paying paying attention to the News

That's the scariest you've ever

heard in your life I mean that's some

really really scary so they're

going to vote against it it makes

perfect sense so I I will add to uh the

nval take which I think is valid that

women are looking to the state for

things that men used to provide you know

the husband used to provide that's valid

and I think that feminism and birth

control certainly are changing the way

thoughts are being formed so that's in

the mix somewhere but I just think

generally speaking men are less easy to

to scare I think that's the big

difference all right

um I hate to even bring this up but I

guess I have to so according to the

Vigilant Fox there's a bombshell autopsy

study now before I tell you what it says

let me give you my opinion that there's

no data that comes down about the

pandemic or the covid that's

credible some of it will be true some of

it will not but I won't know which is

credible and which isn't or which is

true and which is so therefore it's not

credible credible is different from true

so I'm going to tell you what the story

is but I'm also going to tell you

personally might be

true might not be so I'm I'm not a sold

but I could be I could be later sold but

I'm not sold yet but the report is that

aut autopsies show that covid vaccines

are the larger cause of death than even

the the virus itself

it's so it's a study that's been twice

peer-reviewed so that means a lot right

it's a study that was twice

peer-reviewed okay let me explain

peerreview does give you gives you no

confidence

whatsoever it does mean it's not so

obviously stupid that it shouldn't be in

the

conversation it doesn't mean it's real

peer review just looks as surfacy kind

of things so if on the surface the there

was nothing amazingly bad about it they

say well it's peer-reviewed you'd have

to duplicate it and make sure you knew

your data was good before you could have

confidence but here is the

claim 74% of the deaths were were linked

to the vaccination instead of the

covid do I believe that no no I

don't is it possible that is true yes

yes it is is so this is The credibility

thing I just don't believe any of the

pandemic data or conclusions any of it

it's just it's just so so filled with

misinformation I wouldn't know what's

real and what's not and peer review

doesn't help me at all I'm sorry peer

review gives me no confidence at

all um of the covid vaccine related

deaths sudden Cardiac Arrest died

suddenly was the leading cause of deaths

35% of cases do I believe that no Noe

but it's also possible I just don't

believe it on the

surface covid vaccine related deaths

occurred rapidly uh averaging within two

weeks basically and the majority

happened within a week

now that I

believe that that sounds well I would

say that's within the realm of possible

because my understanding is when the

vaccination first came out the expert

said um if you're looking for how

dangerous it is look for what happens in

the first few weeks because uh

overwhelmingly it's predictable that if

it's going to kill people it's going to

be kind of fast you know you don't look

at you know there might still be longer

term problems but most of the risk is

that first two week

period so um that's why although I did

get the first to uh vaccinations that's

why I waited so I waited six months I

think six months after I was eligible

and the reason I waited was first two

weeks I want to see who dies I'm not

going to be first in line month goes by

I'm not sure I trust the data two months

three months six months and it wasn't

until I just really wanted to travel

internationally that I decided it was

time to take the risk but

it makes sense that if there were

injuries they would happen in the first

two weeks more often than after all

right but there's other

research um again I have no idea how how

believable this is but uh there's some

study by let's see independent

investigator John B

senior highlighting findings by Kevin

mccurnin a researcher from blah blah

blah and they say the vaccines are

causing turbo cancer

basically and the Turbo cancers uh would

grow more aggressively than typical ones

and they would affect your lymph

nodes and bone cancer specifically

mentioned lymph nodes and bone

cancer what do you think of that

one

well

um it it doesn't seem to come with

data so I think I'd have to see the data

because cancer is

the number one or number two

killer

so um and I think I think I saw number

that half of all people get cancer have

you ever heard that that half of adults

will get cancer now a lot of it is

treatable so they're not necessarily

dying from it but half of them would get

cancer so if half of people normally get

cancer I don't know how well we could

sort

out you know what's caused by

what so but again do I think this is

credible no do I think it's false no

idea but I don't believe anything that

comes out of the pandemic or anything

about the

vaccination um am I concerned that it

could be true

yes I

am I I may have more to tell you about

that uh in the coming months but yeah

I'm worried about

it all right ladies and gentlemen those

are my prepared

remarks and hope I didn't miss anything

but uh don't worry about nuclear

war I got this I took care of it for

you

um I do worry about how we handle our

all of our health care decisions in the

future oh by the way uh if you want to

hear the greatest irony at the same time

that the vaccinations are being uh

alleged and again I don't I don't

believe the allegations I don't discount

them but I don't have any way to know um

at the same time that the vaccinations

are being blamed for causing turbo

cancer what would be the most ironic

matching news what what news would go

with that that would be so 2024 like the

simulation here it is there there are

increasing anecdotal these are still

anecdotal stories of people who have um

completely tamed their turbo cancer with

iacon is that just perfect or what now

do I do I know that icon works against

cancer no I do not know that so I'm not

making that claim I'm not your doctor

don't take my word for anything it is

true that there is there are an

increasing number of anecdotal claims of

somebody who was in stage four stage

five had tried all the regular things

none of them worked when on itin or

there's another one like it um has some

other name that's similar to I

and uh and there are anecdotal cases of

people who are still around who

shouldn't be

around so wouldn't that be the weirdest

most perfect

simulation that the ion of all the

things in the

world of all the things how could it be

possible that that might be the solution

to the extra or even any cancers that

would be

weird but since you live in a

uh you live in some kind of a weird

simulation

obviously maybe you know one of the

things that makes me think I live in a

simulation is that I see people who

appear to be um living a purchased

experience be if you look at Trump's

life doesn't he look like the life that

somebody signed up and they paid a lot

of money to experience what it would be

like to be Trump

for 80 years or however long he

lives and and Elon

Musk doesn't Elon musk's life look like

literally an adventure he signed up for

all right here's your adventure you're

going to be the uh richest man on earth

you're going to build electric cars

batteries uh you're going to be helping

the president uh yeah you'll be hanging

out with the president pretty much every

day um he'll be listening to you of

course uh you'll be building a rocky

ship to Mars to make us interplanetary

now how in the world does that happen

naturally it sounds

exactly like a a pre-written path that

somebody signed up for and now he's just

enjoying the the path he went on take me

for

example um I have not had you know a

problem free life but what are the odds

that as six years old I knew I would be

a famous

cartoonist how did I know that how did I

also know that I would spend lots of

time talking to large audiences but not

about cartooning necessarily and then

here we are how did I know that was

going to happen when I was a child did I

make it happen because it was in my head

you know how how did Tiger Woods know he

was going to be a golfer at like

two it feels like he signed up for that

adventure and you know when I became a

famous

cartoonist it didn't seem real it just

seemed like some Adventure I'd signed up

for and suddenly everything just came to

me in ways that I couldn't have

predicted so if most of the world are

NPCs but some of us are game players

then um I may have at least one more

Mission because I was thinking if I had

signed up for this

life and um and I it was sort of mapped

out said all right at this age you're

going to do this at this age you're

going to solve this problem for some

people at this age you'll help people

lose weight or something weird things

that I would never have predicted would

be in my resume and then uh when you get

to a certain age what I the adventure

just

ends I feel like I've got at least one

good Adventure left in

me and it's just sort of like tapping me

on the shoulder now I know what it is

but you don't know

yet

but man am I getting tapped on the

shoulder hard so we'll find

out I I feel like I'm going to find out

for sure if this is a simulation

because I'm I'm I'm on a path to trying

something that if it works is going to

blow your mind if it doesn't

work well maybe I wasn't in a simulation

after all but we'll see more on that

later ladies and gentlemen I'm going to

go talk to the people on locals

privately because they're so awesome the

rest of you I will see tomorrow those of

you on X and Rumble and YouTube thanks

for joining

you and locals I'm coming at you in 30

seconds

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e e