o you've got four states. They have some leaders saying that they're going to resist immigration enforcement. And my question is this. How much can they interfere before they go to jail? What exactly does it look like when they interfere? They interfere on what level?

Now it'd be one thing if they tell their local police you know don't talk to the feds. That wouldn't be surprising and maybe that's legal. Maybe that's okay. I mean not okay but maybe it's not technically illegal. But what else would they do? Suppose they tried to hide them. Suppose the government got involved in hiding illegal immigrants of the kind that we want to deport. Don't you go to jail for that? Like at what point is this just a jailable offense that you're not going to let the government do the thing that the government is tasked with doing, defending the country? I guess we'll find out.

Meanwhile the stock of Alphabet you know the owner of Google and more is down pre-market anyway because people think that the Trump DOJ will push for Google to sell off its Chrome browser to break its monopoly. What do you think? Do you think that Google's going to get broken up by Trump officials? I don't know. Are Republicans typically the monopoly busters? What's the history of monopoly busting? Has that been more on the left or more on the right? It's been on the left hasn't it? So but in this case Google looks like an enemy to democracy so that I think the Republicans might look at this as less of a monopoly problem and more of a disinformation problem. Meaning that if Google can control what you see they can