Back to episode — Episode 2664 CWSA 11/19/24
Context —
accept that he would get rid of the criminals and maybe the most recent arrivals first and if we could ever get to the end of that pile which I don't think we can well then maybe you look at some other stuff but we would do it smartly. Anyway according to one report the US government loses between two hundred billion and five hundred billion to fraud every year. To fraud. Up to half a trillion do…
← Previous segment →light as the disinfectant and can the light be brought into the body to be disinfectant which was being trialed at that time was literally being tested or being set up to test at that time. And she allowed the media to say that he said how about drinking bleach and she never corrected that. I she's one of the people I just hate with a passion. I just hate this lady because this was a big big up not just what you did maybe for COVID that can be somebody else's problem to do that but she stood there and watched one of the biggest hoaxes in America being formed around her and never still has never figured out that Trump bookended it with light. He mentioned light then he talked about the light and then he made sure that you knew he was talking about the light at the end while the other ones were talking about something else. I can't forgive that. Birx you need to do something about the drinking bleach hoax and it's not good enough if you say he didn't use the word bleach because if you turn it into well he didn't mean bleach he meant some kind of liquid household disinfectant no he didn't. Nobody would say that. He didn't say that. He was very specific about what he was talking about: light. Which by the way was tested on inserting it down the trachea and didn't work out so the trial was not a success but it was a perfectly smart question to ask can you do this inside a body. So Trump had the smart question the experts were wrong and the experts went away and told you that the smartest guy there the one who knew about light being tested inside bodies was really suggesting drinking bleach. God I'm so mad at that Dr. Birx. You need to fix that and then you can get back on the right side.
While we're getting more trickles of information about Matt Gaetz and the ethics charges against him. So here's what's coming out. This doesn't mean it's true so these are allegations and Gaetz being an American citizen is innocent until proven guilty so I'm going to treat him as innocent. And I want him to be the Attorney General. If all of these things are true I don't really care. Let me be as clear about that as I possibly can. If every allegation that I tell you is true I don't care. Doesn't make any difference to me at all and you can't make me care. You can't guilt me into it. Right now he may have some legal complications and it may affect his nomination unless it's a recess appointment I guess but you can't make me care.
All right so here's the story. Two women have testified in front of the House Ethics Committee that Gaetz paid them for sex and that's according to the attorney who represents them. They were in that very young range but they were above eighteen. There is however one seeming there was one reported exception. So there's one young woman who was eighteen who said that she observed at some party she turned a corner and allegedly saw Matt Gaetz having sex with her friend who she had known for a long time so she would know the friend's age. So the eighteen-year-old had a seventeen-year-old friend. Most of the people there probably were legal age but apparently there was one that wasn't. And the reporting is that there's no reporting that Gaetz would have known the woman's age so nobody says he knew how old she was. I believe that nobody's making that claim. So the possibility that he just assumed she was legal age or you know maybe should have asked and didn't but we don't have testimony that he knew. We do have testimony that when he was told he immediately discontinued meaning not just that night but somebody had been seeing more than once. So we know that as soon as he knew there was an age issue he stopped. When she turned eighteen reportedly it continued so that would show that he was sensitive to the age and when it was clear that he knew it he discontinued.
Now is that an excuse? If it sounds like I'm excusing any of his behavior that's not what's happening. I'm just describing it. Just a description. I'm not making a judgment call. I'm just describing it. And apparently there's some Venmo and maybe PayPal records that show that payments were given to some young women and that they say that those payments were for sex.
So let me add some reality to the world. How many people who have as much money as Gaetz, Gaetz comes from I think a wealthy family so he's got some resources. How many rich people do you think have paid for sex except in sort of a girlfriendy situation not a not an actual necessarily a prostitute but somebody that they said you know if somebody like Dan Bilzerian you know he's a famous social media guy has lots of girlfriends if he were to pay one of his girlfriends to come and stay for the weekend and I'm not saying he does but let's just say he did would she assume he was paying for sex or would she assume that he was paying for company and sex was assumed but it wasn't what he was paying for because there's a little bit of a mind reading element to it because he may be paying because they don't have money to travel. So let's say you're a rich guy with a yacht and you know that if you offer somebody a few thousand dollars they will have the money to travel to you they'll be able to take some time off from their job because you paid them and you're both kind of thinking probably there's going to be some sex but then let's say that the young lady says no I'm not interested and then the rich guy on the yacht says oh oh well I really thought we were on the same page on this but okay I mean I'm not a rapist so of course if you don't want you don't want to and then maybe they don't get together again. But here's the surprise maybe they do. Maybe she says no to sex and maybe he says you know what I really enjoyed hanging out with you so I'm going to pay you again same amount just as if there had been sex but this time we'll just hang out and if you ever change your mind then maybe something mutually beneficial will happen but you know you don't have to. Here's some money.
The thing that's hard to understand at the non-rich person level is the degree to which rich people, rich men transfer money to women that's just part of the travel and is more about the situat
Context —
ion and whether or not their sex is actually a separate conversation. Now you might say to me Scott Scott Scott they both know it's for sex. Yes and no. They both know that that's an intention but it doesn't mean that if the young lady said no that Matt Gaetz was going to force it or that he wouldn't pay what he said he was going to pay. So in my opinion these are always consensual and it's not al…
Next segment → →