you interpreted it as 17 say it's true, well probably true, then you got it completely wrong. There's nothing in the reality that would suggest the 17 intelligence agencies in the United States agreeing tells you anything. It doesn't tell you anything. That's how you should process it.

All right, let's see what else we got here. Yeah that's mostly what I want to talk about today. Or anything I missed in the news today? Somebody says oh there's the question that I was going to bring up. Somebody says what organization did not agree and why exactly? Which organization did not agree? Now it doesn't say that there's an organization that disagrees. So the way I would interpret that is that of the 17 agencies one did the work. Fourteen of them said yeah that looks good to us. We didn't do the work but you know you did the work, looks good to us. And a few of them said we haven't seen it. We haven't looked at it yet. It's going to be more like that.

Somebody says when everyone's thinking the same thing nobody's thinking. Well, less there. All right. I mean you can't rule out the fact that sometimes people are right but it's a good warning. It's a peer-review rubber-stamp. Yeah, peer review I think is totally overrated too.

You got some better information? I do. I got some better information. I watched China's response. If you watched it, China's response to the coronavirus situation, it's pretty obvious that they were concealing information from the world. Do you need 17 intelligence agencies to tell you that