a given that Trump was the worst person in the world and would say any crazy thing.

Now, since the fine people hoax is not true, then suddenly all the other hoaxes, once you learn it's not true and how they did it and how blatantly it was done... I think the thing about the fine people hoax is that you didn't have to really do research to find out it was a lie and that the entire left-leaning media landscape were all in on it. They all knew the truth because they had the video too. So that one's a real... that one just makes your brain go, wait a minute, what? How badly were they lying to me? Because it's one thing when a candidate tells a lie. Like I said, you just expect that. But when the entire media landscape coordinates with the Democrats to tell you a lie like the fine people hoax, that can change your mind when you find out that you were a victim of that. And then that there are 20 more just like it. There are 20 more. The fine people hoax was just the tentpole. You still needed other polls to hold things up, but the main tentpole was that one.

And I'd like to say that I'm happy that I worked for seven years to debunk it. You know, Candace Owens, Joel Pollak, we all worked like the three of us just worked like maniacs for three years every time that popped up to make sure that people saw the counter, you know, the debunk.

Anyway, Harris goes to the border, which gives... I don't think anybody's having more fun in the last few months than Scott Jennings, who I guess would represent the Republican opinion on CNN. Now I'd like to give CNN a little bit of credit. So I think it's prudent to call balls and strikes and not just be in the bag for one team completely. So the fact that Scott Jennings is not only very effective in his communications on behalf of Republicans but he does get a lot of screen time. He gets a lot of screen time. He shows up in clips and he's doing a hell of a job. If you haven't watched any of Scott Jennings debunking the CNN people while they watch, you have to watch it. Not just for what he says, because he does a great job of framing things, but you have to watch the faces of the panelists when they're forced to listen to the truth on CNN. Because they all know they're liars. They're completely aware of what they're doing. So when they give him time and they let him talk, you just have to... I've reposted a few on X if you want to see them. You just have to see the faces while they listen. They try to do the smug smile, but the smile says, "I know you got us."

It's sort of a, you know, I'm doing an impression now. If you're hearing only audio, it's that the smug smile. It's toothless. So a real smile shows your teeth usually. Here's a real smile. See, here's a real smile. It's all teethy. Here's a smile that says Scott Jennings is making you look like you have a brain the size of a squirrel and a million people are watching him do it while your face is on the screen. Yeah, see that? That's the face when you're being dunked on by Scott Jennings on CNN. I'm happy. I'm happy but not happy enough so you can see my teeth. I'm so happy. Look at my smile. I'm not even bothered by it at all. I'm not even bothered by being called out as a ridiculous propagandist right in front of the world. Look at me smiling. It's not bothering me a bit.

So that's hilarious. I recommend it. Here's what Scott Jennings said when Harris went to the border. He said, "Arsonist returns to scene of crime." I told you he's good at reframing. Arsonist returns to scene of crime and we're done. I could continue talking about this topic of Kamala Harris visiting the border, but everything I say is just going to fit under this one reframe: arsonist returns to scene of crime.

Do I need to tell anybody that the Biden administration is 100% responsible for everything we see at the border? Or if you don't like using common words for stuff, just in control of things at the border in some general way. That never happened. Three and a half years of complete, absolute failure to the point where it looks like intentional treason. We don't know that it is, but it sure looks like it. You can't fail harder than she has failed and Biden has failed at the border. You can't fail harder than that. And she returns to the scene of the crime like an arsonist anyway.

And Scott Jennings points out there was a huge tactical mistake to just make sure that people were really paying attention to the border while Harris tells you it's a giant problem. While you say, but you caused the problem. Why are you now acting like you don't know what caused it? And why are you there? You should be hiding in shame for what you've done. And the fact that she went to the border and simply made the border issue more prominent in the news, yeah, that's what mattered. What didn't matter were her clever little arguments and stuff about it. No, nobody cares about that. All they care about is we spent more time thinking about criminals coming across the border.

Now, as luck would have it, the ICE report came out at the same time saying that the number of criminals, literally murderers and rapists, were in the tens of thousands. The ones we know about. Imagine how many people that maybe murdered somebody and got away with it and still came here. So at the same time the public is being exposed, we hope, maybe no Democrats ever saw that data, but it was national news at least on the right. And I think Scott Jennings mentioned these numbers too, so he penetrated the CNN audience with that.

So at the same time we're seeing massive, unreported until now, numbers of criminals that we have deliberately, deliberately led into the country. At the same time we're seeing reports that ISIS is sneaking people into the country. At the same time we're hearing that maybe, I don't know, Hezbollah or some other damn thing is coming in with shoulder-mounted m