Episode 2611 CWSA 09/28/24
Harris at border, Hezbollah in a hole, and election stuff ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Oh my God, I've got this little itch right in the back of my shoulders where I can't reach. This is why you need the telescoping back scratcher. You should have one everywhere because there's this one little area back there I can't reach. Oh my God. Oh, oh my God. Oh, so good. All right. Well, if y…
View segment →rica. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the greatest experience of your life. If you'd like to take this up to levels that nobody can really understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or mug or glass or tankard or shell, a canteen,…
View segment →the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go. The best. I wonder if the coffee is making me healthier. Well, there's a new study discussed in Brink Zone that coffee increases your testosterone and your anaerobic power. That's right. A little bit o…
View segment →t anyway, but trust me, I could have if I tried a little harder. Well, here's the kind of stories I see every day lately. So the Michigan mail-in ballots are now only going to be counted if there's proof of signature. This is Gateway Pundit reporting this, to which I said to myself, wait a minute,…
View segment →a given that Trump was the worst person in the world and would say any crazy thing. Now, since the fine people hoax is not true, then suddenly all the other hoaxes, once you learn it's not true and how they did it and how blatantly it was done... I think the thing about the fine people hoax is that…
View segment →issiles and there's a bunch of assassin teams coming through the border. And there are tens of thousands of Chinese military-looking people coming through the border. We let everybody in. It's the biggest failure in American politics. Yeah, let me say that with a little bit of confidence. In the hi…
View segment →coming in. And at the same time Harris has called for a pathway to citizenship for millions of the migrants she led into the country. I don't know how you could be worse to create the biggest blunder in American history and then to top it by saying let's give them citizenship so they can also vote.…
View segment →e of the Democrats making, effectively, legal, not technically legal in every case but effectively legalizing crime across a whole broad range of important topics. What did that do? It made the entire country unsafe and inner cities extra, extra unsafe. But at the same time that they were making cri…
View segment →h these numbers. It could be that they're only comparing people who are registered one way or the other which you know I would need more detail to know if that's what's happening. But let's say that the numbers are true. What would that suggest would be the likely vote? If there really are more Repu…
View segment →t them all. Which very heavily suggests there's an insider who's saying he's in a blue car, he's heading down the street now. So the head of Hezbollah, clearly not a strategic genius, decided to get what was left of Hezbollah to meet him in person in his command bunker. Well what do you think happe…
View segment →I don't know how much of the deficit per year is in the over a trillion dollar range. Is it like 1.3 trillion somewhere in that range? And how much do we give to Ukraine every year? A few hundred billion? Do we spend a few hundred billion per year? So maybe 15% of our deficit something like that. An…
View segment →em is caused by that but it's not making it better anyway. There's now jets that are going to be able to do automatic takeoffs and landings according to CNN. And if you didn't know this and this is weird, the more advanced planes could already land in bad weather and stuff on instruments. Well it c…
View segment →Oh my God, I've got this little itch right in the back of my shoulders where I can't reach. This is why you need the telescoping back scratcher. You should have one everywhere because there's this one little area back there I can't reach. Oh my God. Oh, oh my God. Oh, so good.
All right. Well, if you didn't notice, the Dilbert comic is up. It's the reborn comic now. Normally the Dilbert comic and the Dilbert Reborn comic don't do any politics. So this isn't really politics. It's just Dogbert picking up on a meme, but I thought you'd like it. Let me read it to you in case you're listening.
Dogbert says to Dilbert, they're just sitting around the breakfast table, and Dilbert says, "I'm sorry." Dogbert says, "When the hunter's bullet grazed my ear, I dropped to the ground out of instinct. Then I jumped up and looked at the pack of wolves I had come to lead and yelled, 'Fight! Fight! Fight!'" And he's raising his fist like Trump did. "Your story..." And then Dilbert says, "Your story is inspiring but derivative." And Dogbert says, "I didn't want to reinvent the wheel. I mean, stick with what works, right? People stick with what works."
Anyway, that's available only on Locals. You have to subscribe to see Dilbert Reborn either on the Locals platform, ScottAdams.locals.com, or you can see it on the X platform if you subscribe.
Oh, by the way, the 2025 Dilbert calendar is available for presale. The desk page-a-day desk calendar made in America for the first time. And if you go to Dilbert.com, you'll see the link for the presale. It's the only place you can get it. It's not going to be on Amazon, not now or ever, and it won't be in bookstores. Only one link. It's the only way you can get it. Made in America.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the greatest experience of your life. If you'd like to take this up to levels that nobody can really understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or mug or glass or tankard or shell, a canteen, jug or flask or vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine, the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go.
The best. I wonder if the coffee is making me healthier. Well, there's a new study discussed in Brink Zone that coffee increases your testosterone and your anaerobic power. That's right. A little bit of coffee and you'll be stronger and have more testosterone. You want me to prove it? Watch this. All right, this is really good fabric on this t-shirt and I didn't want to hurt it anyway, but trust me, I could have if I tried a little harder.
Well, here's the kind of stories I see every day lately. So the Michigan mail-in ballots are now only going to be counted if there's proof of signature. This is Gateway Pundit reporting this, to which I said to myself, wait a minute, are you telling me that in the past the Michigan mail-in ballots didn't need any signature verification? The most basic thing you would do? No. And wait a minute, are you telling me that they're only just barely fixing this in time for the election? That's right. Just a few weeks before the actual election.
But thank goodness, thank goodness there's no other irregularity to report about the election. Well, Jim Jordan has accused the Department of Homeland Security secretary of stonewalling the Ohio election integrity, according to Raw Story. So Jim Jordan says the Homeland Security is refusing to respond to requests from Ohio's top election official for federal citizenship verification records. I guess they want to make sure that the people who are voting are citizens, but the Department of Homeland Security is stonewalling them.
Do you know how many stories I see every day, almost all of them on X, about something that is clearly broken in our election system and somebody's trying to fix it? Now, sometimes successfully, sometimes they get stonewalled. But if we have a pristine election system that we're quite all sure has been perfect, why are so many things getting fixed? Are the people we elect in various states so dumb that they don't know the elections are perfect the way they are and they think they're fixing something that ain't broke? Or is it stuff that's really obviously broken and was obviously broken before, and yet the news that you thought was real told you, "Well, we know those elections were good"?
Yeah, you can know what you don't know. That's what the news told you. Here's a list of things that can't be known that we know. But wait, that can't be known. Yeah, but we know it, right? But there isn't any way to know it, but we know it. Well, how do you know it? Well, we didn't look into it. No, not looking into it is not how you know things. Well, there were no complaints that we saw. But you just said you didn't look into it. That's right. So if you don't look into it, you can be sure what happened exactly.
And that's actually what the news has been telling us for years, and people just sit at home going, "Uh-huh, uh-huh. Didn't look into it. Must be a good election." I can think of no better evidence of a good election than "we didn't really look into it." Oh, by the way, it's designed so you can't fully audit it. Yeah, just normal stuff. Nothing to be concerned about.
How many Democrats will hear either of those stories today? How many Democrats are going to hear about Michigan not checking signatures in the past? Oh my God. Or that we're not entirely sure who are citizens and should be able to vote. Do you think any Democrats will hear that? No, no. It'll be basically zero.
Let's see what the public thinks about election integrity. Well, it used to be that Republicans were confident in the system and Democrats thought it might be a little sketchy. But according to Gallup, that is somewhat reversed, and now the Republicans think the elections are more sketchy than the Democrats. But both sides think they're a little bit sketchy. So 57% of those polled by Gallup said that they will be only somewhat confident in the accuracy of the election, where 24% say they're not too confident and a whopping 19% say they're not confident at all.
I would have added those two together, but only 57% of the public thinks they're very or even somewhat confident in the results. Does that sound about right to you? Does that sound like a system that's been designed to make us confident that we know what happened? No. I don't think you can get to only 57% think the election is fair and reliable unless it's designed to keep you from knowing who won our elections.
Let me say it again. Our elections are very obviously, very obviously designed so you don't know who won. I think that's the only thing you need to know. If you spent a few minutes looking at the design of the system and then I said to you, all right, would you know if the post office threw away some ballots? No, you wouldn't. How would you know that? How would you catch that in an audit? There's no way to catch that. No, it's uncatchable.
If I told you that a state actor, whether it's the CIA or some other country, had worked with an insider at one of the voting machines or tabulator companies and had hacked it with the help of an insider to cover up any trail, would you be able to spot that? No, no you wouldn't. No, there's no way you could catch that. What would be the most obvious way that anybody would cheat? Well, one of those ways. How about if somebody was a non-citizen and yet they got a mail-in vote and then they voted? What part of the process checks all those names against real voters? Well, maybe some states do, but not all of them.
So the most obvious ways that anybody would think of, you know, if you were going to think of a way to cheat, none of them are checkable. The most obvious ways you would cheat. And so to imagine that you could know who won an election is sort of just naive. Yeah, but there we are.
So CNN did a fact check on Kamala Harris's claims about manufacturing jobs. So she said something about Trump being bad and losing manufacturing jobs and Biden being good and getting them back. But apparently it was just wildly incorrect, just a lie basically. But CNN fact-checked it. Now here's my question. Have you noticed the selectivity of CNN's fact-checking? How many votes do you think got changed because somebody exaggerated or had wrong data about manufacturing? None. None. No. Even if the Democrats heard that this was a fake claim and it was a lie, there's probably not even one Democrat who's going to change their vote because somebody exaggerated or said something about manufacturing jobs.
You've got two candidates who both say they want to bring manufacturing back to the US. Both of them are going to use hyperbole about their numbers. Both of them are going to choose a period of time that makes their thing look good. Both of them are going to pad things. It has no effect on the actual outcome of the vote. Now, you know it would if they fact-checked the hoaxes. If they fact-checked all the hoaxes every time she used one, that would affect the election. Because nobody thinks that an ordinary lie told by a politician is different or even noteworthy. Nobody cares. It's just part of the process.
But if you told the CNN and MSNBC viewers that their entire worldview was created by a mesh network of hoaxes that the media creates, that would change some votes. Because we've saw that a number of the people who said, "I've been a lifetime Democrat but I changed my vote," the number one thing they point out is the fine people hoax. The fine people hoax is the tentpole hoax, meaning it's the one that keeps all the other hoaxes alive. If you believed the fine people hoax, then you accepted as a given that Trump was the worst person in the world and would say any crazy thing.
Now, since the fine people hoax is not true, then suddenly all the other hoaxes, once you learn it's not true and how they did it and how blatantly it was done... I think the thing about the fine people hoax is that you didn't have to really do research to find out it was a lie and that the entire left-leaning media landscape were all in on it. They all knew the truth because they had the video too. So that one's a real... that one just makes your brain go, wait a minute, what? How badly were they lying to me? Because it's one thing when a candidate tells a lie. Like I said, you just expect that. But when the entire media landscape coordinates with the Democrats to tell you a lie like the fine people hoax, that can change your mind when you find out that you were a victim of that. And then that there are 20 more just like it. There are 20 more. The fine people hoax was just the tentpole. You still needed other polls to hold things up, but the main tentpole was that one.
And I'd like to say that I'm happy that I worked for seven years to debunk it. You know, Candace Owens, Joel Pollak, we all worked like the three of us just worked like maniacs for three years every time that popped up to make sure that people saw the counter, you know, the debunk.
Anyway, Harris goes to the border, which gives... I don't think anybody's having more fun in the last few months than Scott Jennings, who I guess would represent the Republican opinion on CNN. Now I'd like to give CNN a little bit of credit. So I think it's prudent to call balls and strikes and not just be in the bag for one team completely. So the fact that Scott Jennings is not only very effective in his communications on behalf of Republicans but he does get a lot of screen time. He gets a lot of screen time. He shows up in clips and he's doing a hell of a job. If you haven't watched any of Scott Jennings debunking the CNN people while they watch, you have to watch it. Not just for what he says, because he does a great job of framing things, but you have to watch the faces of the panelists when they're forced to listen to the truth on CNN. Because they all know they're liars. They're completely aware of what they're doing. So when they give him time and they let him talk, you just have to... I've reposted a few on X if you want to see them. You just have to see the faces while they listen. They try to do the smug smile, but the smile says, "I know you got us."
It's sort of a, you know, I'm doing an impression now. If you're hearing only audio, it's that the smug smile. It's toothless. So a real smile shows your teeth usually. Here's a real smile. See, here's a real smile. It's all teethy. Here's a smile that says Scott Jennings is making you look like you have a brain the size of a squirrel and a million people are watching him do it while your face is on the screen. Yeah, see that? That's the face when you're being dunked on by Scott Jennings on CNN. I'm happy. I'm happy but not happy enough so you can see my teeth. I'm so happy. Look at my smile. I'm not even bothered by it at all. I'm not even bothered by being called out as a ridiculous propagandist right in front of the world. Look at me smiling. It's not bothering me a bit.
So that's hilarious. I recommend it. Here's what Scott Jennings said when Harris went to the border. He said, "Arsonist returns to scene of crime." I told you he's good at reframing. Arsonist returns to scene of crime and we're done. I could continue talking about this topic of Kamala Harris visiting the border, but everything I say is just going to fit under this one reframe: arsonist returns to scene of crime.
Do I need to tell anybody that the Biden administration is 100% responsible for everything we see at the border? Or if you don't like using common words for stuff, just in control of things at the border in some general way. That never happened. Three and a half years of complete, absolute failure to the point where it looks like intentional treason. We don't know that it is, but it sure looks like it. You can't fail harder than she has failed and Biden has failed at the border. You can't fail harder than that. And she returns to the scene of the crime like an arsonist anyway.
And Scott Jennings points out there was a huge tactical mistake to just make sure that people were really paying attention to the border while Harris tells you it's a giant problem. While you say, but you caused the problem. Why are you now acting like you don't know what caused it? And why are you there? You should be hiding in shame for what you've done. And the fact that she went to the border and simply made the border issue more prominent in the news, yeah, that's what mattered. What didn't matter were her clever little arguments and stuff about it. No, nobody cares about that. All they care about is we spent more time thinking about criminals coming across the border.
Now, as luck would have it, the ICE report came out at the same time saying that the number of criminals, literally murderers and rapists, were in the tens of thousands. The ones we know about. Imagine how many people that maybe murdered somebody and got away with it and still came here. So at the same time the public is being exposed, we hope, maybe no Democrats ever saw that data, but it was national news at least on the right. And I think Scott Jennings mentioned these numbers too, so he penetrated the CNN audience with that.
So at the same time we're seeing massive, unreported until now, numbers of criminals that we have deliberately, deliberately led into the country. At the same time we're seeing reports that ISIS is sneaking people into the country. At the same time we're hearing that maybe, I don't know, Hezbollah or some other damn thing is coming in with shoulder-mounted missiles and there's a bunch of assassin teams coming through the border. And there are tens of thousands of Chinese military-looking people coming through the border. We let everybody in. It's the biggest failure in American politics.
Yeah, let me say that with a little bit of confidence. In the history of American government, opening the border the way it was done is the biggest mistake in American history. If you could come up with a better example of a bigger mistake, I don't know one. And the thing is we haven't seen the price of that yet. The price is yet to be paid because we're letting in a whole bunch of terrorists at the same time Iran is going to go to war with Israel. Maybe we'll talk about that. And what would Iran do? What have we been warned by the people who know how things work in this world? What is Iran going to do if, let's say, Iran itself is attacked as opposed to its proxies? They're going to attack inside the United States. Your lights are going to go off because Iran is not a "me too" follower kind of a country. They have abilities. They got skills and they're probably already in our cyber. They probably have already penetrated some of our systems. They almost certainly have agents with weapons in the United States. Not that they're necessarily going to do an October 7th attack, but they could certainly do things that we weren't sure if it was them or somebody else.
So it is, in my opinion, the biggest blunder in all of American government history. I don't think there's a second place to that. And I guess what's different about it is that it was obvious it was a blunder before they did it. I mean, it looks so much like somebody was trying to destroy the country. It doesn't even look like this was ever a serious thing that somebody thought was a good idea. It simply looks like somebody had a plan to destroy the country. I'll talk more about that.
Speaking of which, Harris looked at the Trump border wall. So she had to stand in front of the border wall that Trump built, which at one point in 2019 she'd called that medieval vanity project. And now she's all about building some more. How do the Democrats not notice what's going on? But they don't. They don't seem to notice anyway.
Former Navy SEAL Shawn Ryan, who's got a podcast, he was on Joe Rogan and he said the Taliban is funneling terrorists into the US through the southern border for some kind of October 7th style attack. Now I don't think Iran would want to do an October 7th in the United States, but ISIS might. ISIS might. So that's all coming in. And at the same time Harris has called for a pathway to citizenship for millions of the migrants she led into the country. I don't know how you could be worse to create the biggest blunder in American history and then to top it by saying let's give them citizenship so they can also vote. The level of incompetence is way beyond anything I could call accidental. It doesn't look accidental. Nobody could be this dumb. I mean, nobody could really.
So she gives a speech after she went to the border. And I would like to say as far as I could tell when she gave her speech she was not inebriated. And I thought she did a great job. So it was a teleprompter speech. At first I thought maybe it was impromptu and I was more impressed, but then when I looked, oh it's teleprompter. But the teleprompter she does really well now. So I guess she's been doing a lot of practice on the campaign trail. But man, she read that teleprompter. She did not cackle. She had all the right motions and everything. But I did note a few problems.
Oh, number one, if you'd like to know when she's inebriated and when she's not, there's a tell that is guaranteed. Right now I think you can tell by just the way she talks and everything, but there's one tell for whether she's inebriated. And she definitely wasn't. She was in full control and did a good job in her speech. Here's her hand gestures when she's not inebriated. They're crisp and they're smallish. So she'd be like, dupe, dupe, crisp, tight, controlled. So when she's talking, her hands are very much part of a good presenter's hands.
Now I'm going to give you the impression of when she's inebriated. Shoulders moving and hands are not tight. They're all over the place. Let me tell you what we're going to do. You watch for it. Tight hands. Tight versus loose hands. If you wonder if she's sometimes inebriated in public, you only have to watch her speech where she's not. Once you see her operating at 100% as she was during her speech, there's no doubt that the other thing is inebriated. There's no doubt at all. And you can even see that she's picking her spots. When she does a national speech or a debate, definitely not inebriated. Not a suggestion, not a hint, nothing. But when she's talking to a friendly, a friendly like students or a little group of people who love her, she's drunk as a... we've seen it so many times. There's no doubt about it. Or inebriated in some fashion.
The other thing I haven't heard anybody say yet, but let me be the first to point it out. So she gives a speech that was largely about her getting serious about the border. Did anybody notice that the speech was all about her? Here's what I expect when you've got a massive border problem and somebody's running for president. Here's what I'm going to do about the border. I'm going to build a wall. I'm going to reverse the executive orders. I'm going to get rid of this fake asylum thing. So that's what you would say if you came there to tell people how you're going to fix something.
But she's got a little problem because any of those ideas, if they sound good, somebody's going to say, so why didn't you do that already? Joe Biden says you're in charge of everything. So she can't really come out and say here's a bunch of stuff I'm going to do. The only thing she said specifically she's going to do is she wants to create a path to citizenship, which is making the problem better or worse? Worse. The only concrete suggestion is something that whether you're on the left or the right you'd say, well that's creating an incentive to come here. That's worse. That's not better. That's worse.
But here's the part that once you hear it, if you listen to it again, listen for this. She only talked about herself. The only time she talked about somebody else, she talked about the poor migrants, the non-citizens. What she didn't talk about is the pain and destruction so much that's coming on the American citizens. So here's her talking about the border. "I was a prosecutor." Okay, we're not hiring you to be a prosecutor. "I have toured the tunnels." Okay, I mean we all know there are tunnels. Does that make you a little extra qualified because you've been in one? "You wouldn't believe how smooth the walls are of the tunnels under the border." Okay, well you know maybe it could be true that Trump is not aware how smooth the walls are on the tunnels under the border. That's not much of a selling point for you. Well, Trump doesn't even know how smooth the walls are. It's not like he's in favor of the tunnels.
So she had... she just went on forever. The entire time I listened, I didn't hear it all, but the entire time I did listen she only talked about herself and none of it was relevant. You're a prosecutor, got it. So because you're a prosecutor and your entity prosecuted some people in this context, what do you know that I don't know? Do I not know that fentanyl is coming across the border and probably killed my stepson? Everybody knows that. Do you not know that the cartels are in charge at the border? Do you not know that millions of people will come? What is it we don't know that we're now educated because we know you were once a prosecutor and that the walls of the tunnels were shiny? You got nothing. You got nothing, lady.
Meanwhile the border patrol said yet another lie. As with all things border-related, she was nowhere to be found when we needed her. She ignored the border problems until she... that she created over three years and admitted that the immigration system under her and Biden was broken. So she said she was going to fix the problem, but isn't that really admitting that she's the source of the problem too? Because it didn't happen under Trump. He had it fixed.
Well, the amuse account on X says that Kamala Harris did some election interference by creating some campaign ads in which they had two people saying that they used to be Trump supporters but now they were in Pennsylvania and now they're not. Well it turns out that was fake. They were not real voters. Well they might vote, but there were actors who have always been lifelong Democrats. So they got two lifelong Democrat actors to pretend that they switched.
Here's my question for you. How hard would it be for Trump to find some prominent Democrats who switched to him? Well not too hard. RFK Jr., Elon Musk, Scott Adams, Sachs. There's a pretty long list. He wouldn't have to hire an actor. Trump would not have to hire an actor to say I used to be a Democrat but now I can't, I just can't do it anymore. But she had to hire actors. They couldn't find any real people.
I should tell you something. All right, so here's my summary for today. I mean I'm not ending, but this will capture my thoughts. I think it's kind of stunning the degree to which Democrats have legalized crime while turning the Department of Justice, who should be fighting the crime, into the criminals. In other words, lawfare, etc.
So let me just give you some examples. So here's examples of Democrats who are basically legalizing crime. Now that's a little hyperbole when I say legalizing crime, but I'll give you the examples and you'll see why the hyperbole fits. They wanted to defund the police. They wanted to stop arresting shoplifters up to a certain dollar amount, which caused stores to close and massive crime. They're letting the homeless control the sidewalks with everything that brings with it. They're creating an asylum path for migrants who are willing to lie. The migrant process is a legal process but not if you lie. If you lie and say that you're coming for asylum but you're really not coming for asylum, they have legalized that crime. They've essentially made it legal to lie that you're here for asylum because nobody's going to get punished for it and it's the obvious way to go if you're coming in.
They created the sanctuary cities to thwart any legal processes about the immigrants. Lie about the amount of crime incoming. So they lied about how much crime is coming across the border. They allowed teams of assassins and terrorists into the country. They are pushing DEI which is literally legalized discrimination against white people, white males. That's illegal. They censor Americans via proxy. This is the Mike Benz stuff where we know that the State Department and the Democrats get European and other entities, Brazilian, to do the things that they couldn't legally do to citizens. So they just use external entities to put the pressure on X and other platforms, etc.
So they're censoring. They want to take your guns away of course. There's the rhetoric that engages assassinations in my opinion. They've got elections that can't be fully audited which supports criminal acts during the elections. And in Manhattan apparently 60% of felonies are reduced to misdemeanors. So that's Alvin Bragg. 60% of felonies are reduced to misdemeanors. Now some are always... I mean that's not the first time that's ever happened but 60% feels like a lot to me. And the lesser charges are just released.
All right, so that's a case of the Democrats making, effectively, legal, not technically legal in every case but effectively legalizing crime across a whole broad range of important topics. What did that do? It made the entire country unsafe and inner cities extra, extra unsafe. But at the same time that they were making criminals legal, they were making the people whose job it is to fight crime, they turned them into criminals.
So they turn the criminals into legal things like, oh yeah you could just say asylum and you could come in. Ah you could take up to $950, still technically illegal but we're not going to do much about it, right? So they legalized crime across a whole broad array of categories and then they took the people who were supposed to fight that crime and they literally turned them into criminals. Because the lawfare against Trump in my opinion is purely criminal. The J6, the degree to which they were overcharged in my opinion is just purely criminal. And they've canceled a lot of people for supporting Trump in the media and supporters and they've gone after his supporters, are trying to take him down.
And if you put all this together it looks like a plan to destroy America. It looks intentional. Now I usually avoid any kind of conspiracy theory that deep. I try to because when you just look at a bunch of patterns it's easy to convince yourself that the patterns mean more than they do. But holy hell that's a lot of pattern.
Let me give you... yeah and apparently ICE has known, which means the administration has known, they let in 663,000 people with criminal histories. 13,000 were convicted of homicide. Convicted. And they let them into the country. 16,000 for sexual assaults and 1,845 facing homicide charges.
Now speaking of Shawn Ryan, in his podcast I'm going to ask you for a favor. I watched a clip in which he had an author on just recently. Shawn Ryan did. And I didn't catch the author's name or the name of his book. So if you saw it and you probably did or maybe you could Google it for me, could you put in the comments the name of the author? Once I tell you what the topic was you'll recognize it. Suddenly he gets his due credit because the author was very, very convincing.
And here's a story that I heard from the author on Shawn Ryan's podcast. And I'm interested if you've ever heard of this before. So Obama wanted DEI and how it happened that it was everywhere in the country was somewhat clever and I'd never heard this before. So you got a president who wants DEI to be a big thing and he worked with John Brennan and also with the various government entities. And the idea was if you could get the government to push DEI and to really embrace it and also hire a lot of people for those agencies that are under the DEI umbrella, that further will make DEI a big thing.
But here's the part I didn't realize before. That if you make the government entities and agencies all DEI advocates, they're going to force companies to be DEI because those companies need approvals and need to work productively with entities within the government. So all you have to do is get the government to push DEI and then the government will push each of the agencies and people who have some control over individuals and companies can then push it themselves.
And apparently John Brennan has said it's one of his greatest accomplishments or the greatest accomplishment of his career was bringing DEI to the CIA when he was in charge of it. And I believe that over 50% of the CIA now is women and that was part of his accomplishments he says.
So when I look at DEI, which is literally illegal, that is tearing the country apart and has created a system which guarantees incompetence. Not because of the individuals, not because of anybody's genes or culture or chromosomes or DNA or anything like that. That's a separate, that's not in the conversation. It's just that the pool of applicants to fulfill DEI is smallish and if you have to do it you're going to just hire less qualified people.
And what we should see under a DEI environment within one decade, you should see every major institution crumble. That would be the prediction that you could predict on paper. And again not because of anybody's DNA, not because of anybody's race or culture, nothing to do with that. It's just that if you force a constraint on a thing that's barely working in the first place, which is the economy, the economy is always delicately between working great and failing. There's always that small difference between huge economic success and well that didn't work. And DEI is by far enough to move you from the great economic success to everything fell apart and we're not sure why. Just everything we tried to do didn't work. You made a phone call to tech support, they couldn't help you. You know, basically nothing works.
So we are in that phase. We are in the predictable stage of everything up because we have too many incompetent people in every organization and it was intentional. Now if you ask them they'd say we're trying to make the organizations look like America, make sure everybody has opportunity. I like all of that on paper. I like it all. It's just if the only way you can implement it is a bunch of managers saying I'm going to get fired unless I hire somebody who's a DEI person and even if I can't find a good one I'm gonna have to take a chance until everything falls apart. And that's where we are. Everything's falling apart and honestly it's mostly a DEI problem more than anything. It's DEI.
Now on top of that everything's more complicated every year. So in theory an average person who could do a reasonable job at something no longer can. So the complexity of everything makes it so if you're not in the top 20% of capability you're not going to be able to do anything. Everything's just too hard. You know back when you just had to milk a cow, oh almost everybody could do it. All you had to do is shoot an animal and skin it. Well most people could do it with a little bit of practice. But most people can't do most jobs now. They're just too complicated anyway.
Frank Luntz says that for the first time in a long time there are more people registered as Republicans than Democrats in the entire country. Did you see that coming? I did not see that coming. I have to admit that one snuck up on me. Because you know what it is about Republicans that really stands out and I've always loved this about conservatives and Republicans. They're really about just getting the work done. They're not so much about making sure that everybody knows it. So there's something about this number that says to me that Republicans just got to work and said we can't give up the country. If there are more Democrats than there are Republicans we're all dead. And so since the obvious solution to having more Democrats than Republicans is you register more Republicans, they did.
Now again Scott Presler gets a huge bit of credit for what he did especially in Pennsylvania but there must be a lot more people working on this. I don't know, is this the Lara Trump part of the world? I'm not sure if what she's doing is directly or indirectly related to this. Now some of this might be that the Democrats did such a bad job that people are hiding as independents because I think that happens. If Biden is just embarrassing, people will say I'm an independent. Yeah, not my fault. Sure I voted for him but now I'm independent. Now I'm independent. So some of it is fake. People just hiding because they don't want to take the heat. But it's never been this way before and it's not even that close. There's 48% Republican and 45% Democrat now.
There's still so many... wait a minute this can't be right. How's that? No that's not right. These numbers can't be right because that would mean that the independents are... no this can't be right. I thought independents were about a third of voters. Am I wrong about that? The last time I saw these numbers the independents, Democrats and Republicans were roughly about the same number and this would suggest that there are very few independents. So that can't be right.
All right I'm going to pivot. My pivot is there's something wrong with these numbers. It could be that they're only comparing people who are registered one way or the other which you know I would need more detail to know if that's what's happening. But let's say that the numbers are true. What would that suggest would be the likely vote? If there really are more Republicans registered than Democrats, who would win the not the electoral vote but the overall national vote? Should be the one who's got the most people registered because that's what it's been before. You know when there were more Democrats and sure enough they won the national vote even when they lost the Electoral College.
So what would be the result hypothetically if these numbers held and let's say independents, we don't know this but let's say independents match to these ratios. I think independents are going to be far more for Trump but let's say it's just this much. That would suggest a landslide, right? If Trump wins the popular vote nationwide the electoral vote is a landslide. Now I need somebody smart to tell me I'm wrong about that but I think I'm right.
So you've got the national polls which depending on how they weight things and how they ask the question and some assumptions that they make when they collect their data, they look a little sketchy don't they? Now the national polls sometimes say Kamala ahead sometimes by a lot, sometimes they say Trump's ahead sometimes by a good amount. So the national polls appear to be completely funky and unreliable at this moment.
But do you think that we can accurately count how many people have registered as Republicans versus Democrats? Yes, because that doesn't require an assumption and it doesn't require any... there's not much room for weasel. It's probably just data that you're either registered or you're not. So if you're going to believe one, what would be more believable? That the Republican registrations have surged which would indicate a landslide for Trump or that the individual polls which we've never trusted in the past and always seem to get mysteriously accurate right toward the election sort of in October.
Do you know what the October surprise is yet? One of them. There's probably going to be lots of them. Have you figured out the October surprise? Well if this is true, the Republican registrations have now outnumbered Democrat registrations, this election is over in terms of voting. You know I'm going to agree with Eric Weinstein that we don't know if Trump will become president because the bad actors, it looks like there's no limits to what they'd be willing to do and I mean actually no limits. So I think Trump probably has a dominant position and it looks like a landslide if nothing changes. But remember there are going to be lots of changes.
So here's what I think will be your October surprise. Now can't guarantee it, can't guarantee it, but the pollsters are all going to be showing a landslide by election day. Because if they don't, if they don't then next election you're going to say there was a landslide and you weren't even close. Why should we listen to you again? Why should we pay you for your stuff? Why should we ever report what you said again? So it becomes really important for the pollsters to end up in the top five, top ten. So if they're way off a few weeks before election, which is what October... the October surprise is going to be the polls. Now you knew it was going to happen but here's the surprise. It's going to be bigger than you thought. I think the surprise is going to be the degree of pollster shenanigans that are happening in September are beyond what you imagined was possible. That's what I think will be your surprise. Now I could be wrong, right? It'd be easy to be wrong about this.
But when you see the people on the streets, I just saw another person on the street thing. They're asking just young people who they supported. It seems to be Trump every time somebody goes on the street. And even if maybe it was always close to half and half, the Trump supporters who are young will say it out loud with no embarrassment whatsoever as if it's the cooler thing to do now. And once you see how many 20-somethings are just yelling Trump into the camera so happy to support him, perfectly happy that they're seen by their fellow students, seen by whoever is going to see the video, there's nothing holding it back. Trump. And I think it's because eating the dogs, eating the cats is what made him popular with young people. Well plus the assassination attempt was remarkable, the fight fight fight part. But the cats and the dogs thing is still trending on TikTok and when you see people's reaction to him and you see the number of people who are still dancing to that, something's happening. Something big's happening.
All right. Of course you know the big news is Israel took out the head of Hezbollah with a gigantic set of bombs. Bunker busters I guess. Yes. So here's what happened. See how impressed you are by this. So Hezbollah has reportedly, I don't know, 100,000 rockets that could be fired at Israel. If they were to fire them all at the same time or in big waves then the Iron Dome would have a tough time getting them all just because of numbers. So really the threat that Hezbollah had was that we'll fire them in big waves at the same time. It wasn't really a risk if they did one here or there. The Iron Dome could get them and chances are it wasn't going to hit anything anyway.
So what do you think it takes for Hezbollah to fire all of their stuff at the same time? Well coordination obviously. Coordination. And what does that take? Well some kind of communication. And what does that take? Well you're going to have to use some kind of digital communication. And apparently because they thought the cell phones could be too easily tracked by Israel they had moved to pagers and walkie-talkies. Which as you know Israel found a way to make explody.
So once all their pagers and walkie-talkies exploded, what's next? Well the first thing that you might not realize is that they may have lost their ability to coordinate an attack. Because if they don't do it all at the same time they're just wasting their missiles. Send up three missiles, Israel knocks down three missiles and you're done. So if you can't shoot them all at the same time you've lost your only weapon. The one that anybody's worried about. So I can't say for sure that they lost that ability but they haven't launched a big wave of missiles and they did lose all of their leadership.
And the last guy that was left said to himself, huh I'm going to have to figure out how to rebuild and get things coordinated again but I better not use any digital means. So send out the runners and get the third level down of commanders because the other ones have all been killed and we'll meet in my command bunker. Yeah we're whatever's left of the leadership of Hezbollah after most of it's already been killed. We're going to meet in my well-known command bunker. My well-known, well-identified command bunker. Knowing that there are obviously spies working because without the spies Israel would not have been able to kill all of the top guys. Commander already wherever they were they got them all. Which very heavily suggests there's an insider who's saying he's in a blue car, he's heading down the street now.
So the head of Hezbollah, clearly not a strategic genius, decided to get what was left of Hezbollah to meet him in person in his command bunker. Well what do you think happened then? I'm not supposed to laugh at war but did this really happen? Did Israel really figure out a way to kill all the leaders and then make sure that the new team of leaders all went in the same place at the same time and that they would know where they were and when they were there and then they would drop a bunch of bunker busters on it and just make it a hole in the ground?
Well there's nothing funny about this situation but Hezbollah had been telling a lot of lies and Israel decided to debunk them. That's right they debunked them. And when they were done the thing that used to be called a command bunker looked a lot like Justin Bieber's sphincter after a Diddy party. I'll just let you live with that one for a while. Take your time. Take your time. Whenever you're done we'll get back to it. Okay yeah looked like Justin Bieber's sphincter after a Diddy party.
Anyway we don't see them firing back a whole bunch of missiles. Iran apparently had a big old meeting and Iran thinks, some people are saying Iran is going to send some troops to Lebanon. I don't know if that's a good idea for them but it gets better. Apparently Israel hacked the airport control tower for Lebanon, Beirut I guess. And since we know that Iran apparently was shipping in supplies and weapons to Hezbollah they got to the control tower, took it over with hackers and told the planes they better turn around because they're in trouble if they land. And there's some evidence that one of the planes that was coming from Iran to Lebanon turned around immediately. Turned around immediately which means it was probably full of weapons. Don't know for sure but maybe.
Well if any of this is true Israel basically just rewrote all the war books about how you do anything. The level of brilliance that appears to be here... now remember this is still fog of war propaganda. We're getting a version of the news that says Israel is beyond brilliant. So just be careful that you're maybe not seeing all the warts. Maybe things weren't as clean and maybe there was some luck involved and so we don't know everything. But if we were just to judge it on the surface it would be the greatest military strategic success of my life. I mean the amount that I am impressed by what Israel's done militarily. And again I want to, if somebody is new to me, I don't back Israel because they don't back me. It's not my job to back Israel. Now they're an ally and I take that seriously but I'm an American so I'm sitting over here caring what's good for me. Israel is just something I'm observing. And sometimes I say to myself all right if that happened to America how would we act? Well we're full of DEI so we couldn't pull that off but I wish we could. I wish we were that smart anyway.
There's a new drone. South Korea made a drone that works on hydrogen. It's a hydrogen drone. Tech Times says so. It's got a 5,800 mile range and can stay in the air for hours compared to 30 minutes for a normal drone. So if you've got something that can lift some weight and can go 5,800 miles and stay in the air for hours, the degree of warfare you can do with small drones, because these would be smallish ones, is a whole new level.
So I don't know how close we are to an all-robot war where it's just drones in the sky because you don't want to waste a pilot and robot dogs on the ground. We're pretty close. We're pretty close. We might actually get to the point where if the robots on one side defeat the robots on the other that the humans will just surrender rather than send humans to fight their robots which would just be slaughter. We'll just say all right you robots beat our robots. We don't like it but you're in charge now. You own our country. We're getting there. I think you'll see it in your lifetime.
Judge Chutkan, according to Jeff Clark, she's gaming with the timing of things so that a few weeks before the election there would be some kind of reveal from Jack Smith. So Jack Smith the DA he's got some materials that we haven't seen but the redacted version might come out mid-October. Now whatever a prosecutor of Trump produces in mid-October is going to be bad for Trump. Now do you think it's a huge coincidence that the badness would come out at the very worst time? Do we expect that whatever badness he produces is real like actually in context and accurate? Nope. I do not believe that. I believe that they would, because remember Department of Justice are criminals and the criminals are now legal. So this would be the Department of Justice. Now they're criminals. So the criminal thing to do would be to make up a bunch of and know that there's no time to correct it before the election and just depend on the fake news to say it's all true and then after the election you do the fact check. It's like oh yeah I guess this wasn't as true as we thought. Sorry about that. Yeah yeah sorry. That's what it looks like.
Well one of my favorite things yesterday was that Trump and Zelensky met. Now that's unusual because Trump is not the sitting president so you have to be delicate about what you can and cannot do in that situation. But I loved the press conference after where Trump, his 6'3" is standing over Zelensky who's 5'6" or whatever he is, and Zelensky just looked like he'd just been punished by his parents. Like he looked like a defeated... he didn't look like Zelensky of old. "Give us weapons. We'll fight every day. We win." And Trump is just saying... what was Trump saying? He was saying basically it's over. We need to negotiate a deal. You know we'll just figure out who gets what land. We'll sort it out.
Now that's when Zelensky in the past would have said something like no we will fight. We must get every inch of land back. We will never quit. They can't steal our land. The best he could do because he knows there's a good chance he's going to be dealing with Trump in the future, the best he could do is remind us that Russia is on Ukrainian land and so when they negotiate you know that should be top of mind. But even he was talking about negotiating now. Correct me if I'm wrong. So now Zelensky seems on board with negotiating and obviously some kind of land agreement will have to happen. Putin of course is interested in negotiating. And they're the two sides. Who's not interested in negotiating? Democrats and the deep state and the military-industrial complex.
But if you put Trump in there there's nobody left who wants the war. Zelensky doesn't really want any more of it. You know he'd love to win but doesn't seem to be an option so forget about that. Yeah all it takes is a President Trump. Now when he'd been saying he could get it done in a day you know that's hyperbole. Nobody could do it in a day. But basically he could because all it takes is Trump to be president and then there's nobody in the game who wants to keep fighting because Ukraine and Russia definitely don't. They definitely don't. And as long as Trump doesn't there's nobody left. So yes he could wind it up soon as he gets in there.
I wonder if Trump actually worried that he could end the war before he got in office and before there's even an election so that it wouldn't count in his benefit on the election. But if you want to end this war you now have a 100% obvious way to do it that you control as a citizen. You can just vote for Trump and this war is over. It really is.
All right Bill Maher had a show last night. We always talk about him. He is a good indicator of what people are thinking and on that basis it's fascinating. And he actually said that we should defend Ukraine and that it's basically so little money for the United States that we're getting some benefit of degrading Russia. We're protecting our ally, kind of an ally. And this is what Maher says about the money. He says that basically none of us know that none of us can tell the difference the amount of money we spent in Ukraine. He's saying that you and I don't feel it. To which I say have you heard of inflation?
Now I don't know how much of the deficit per year is in the over a trillion dollar range. Is it like 1.3 trillion somewhere in that range? And how much do we give to Ukraine every year? A few hundred billion? Do we spend a few hundred billion per year? So maybe 15% of our deficit something like that. And then of course we have to build up our own military because we're sending our bullets over there so we got to buy our own bullets or something. So he is correct that we cannot identify the difference in our life from the Ukraine expenses. I can't identify okay how much of my inflation was because that war. Might be 10%. But it's also not ending and the amount we're spending isn't really the total issue. It's about whether we should be having a war with a nuclear power and what are we getting from it and is it worth 200 billion. And if we've got 200 billion extra to spend on anything is that where you want it to go? Because 200 billion is real money.
Anyway so far it's been 10 billion here 7 billion in there. I don't know what it adds up to.
All right Vivek Ramaswamy says that Musk is super hardcore about firing federal employees working with Trump. And I saw this on the George account. Good account to follow on X. George. Vivek Ramaswamy said it looks like Elon will use OIC on the government's fat. And here's a quote. Elon's pretty hardcore. And Vivek says I said 75% of the federal bureaucrats. He said you need to put at least 75. So Elon Musk's correction to Vivek who wanted to get rid of 75% of the bureaucrats was you should say at least. How much do you love that? How much do you love that? That if you could imagine that you could ever get rid of 75% of the bureaucrats that you should really be saying more. I just love that. I don't know that they can get rid of more than 75% but the fact that he's not going to be limited by your 75% estimate, I love that it's at least 75%.
Anyway according to the Gateway Pundit, Antonio Gracias, writer, he's got an argument in their opinion piece that liberal policies are driving up our obesity rates now up to 40% of the adults or is it everybody? 40% are obese. I don't know if that's 40% of adults and 20% of children. Now when I saw that opinion I said to myself I don't know if I want to read this because I don't think he's going to convince me that liberal policies are making people fat. Because I said to myself how are liberal policies making anybody fat? Explain that.
And he talked about how school gym classes are cutting way back so kids are less active in school. And I said public schools. Okay Democrats pretty much have a lock on everything that happens in the public school. So yeah I guess okay. Yeah less physical activity sure. Then there's fat acceptance. The idea that Democrats are pushing the idea that you don't need to lose weight. You're perfectly healthy. Nobody should judge you. And while I agree with the notion that I don't like fat shaming there's no question that the public attitude toward it has an impact on how people act, right? If people say you're fine you can be any weight you want there's going to be more people overweight. If the public says cruelly don't be like that there's probably going to be less of it. People are going to try harder.
Now there might also be some food related illnesses but that's a separate question. I'm talking about anorexia for example. There are food deserts now in a lot of poor areas because the crime was so high that places that would sell you healthier food like a grocery store just said oh we're out. Here's there's still McDonald's so good luck. That feels fair. And then of course the pandemic and the lockdown had some lasting effects. So I'm not sure how much of the obesity is because of liberal policies but I do think that Antonio made his case. He made his case. It's just we can't tell what percentage of the whole problem is caused by that but it's not making it better anyway.
There's now jets that are going to be able to do automatic takeoffs and landings according to CNN. And if you didn't know this and this is weird, the more advanced planes could already land in bad weather and stuff on instruments. Well it could land autonomously. So even if the pilot dropped dead the advanced planes could just land and the landing some say the machine would do it better than the pilot. Pilot can make a human error. The machine's much less likely. But what I didn't know is that the planes were not equipped to take off autonomously which seems weird. It seems like taking off would be easier than landing but taking off is actually harder I mean where it can be. So it's actually a big deal that airplanes are learning to take off on their own at the same time that robotaxis are coming on. So the idea of having a human sitting behind a steering wheel for anything it will be largely defunct except for recreational stuff like I don't know maybe your fishing boat or something anyway.
And that ladies and gentlemen is all I wanted to say that's worth saying today. We'll keep an eye on whatever is happening with Hezbollah and Israel but as I've said before if Israel's going to get tough with its enemies and neighbors there's never been a better time in history to do it. Because first of all it seems like they have a good handle on the military strategy obviously but also there's no leadership in the United States. So if they can get themselves a little bit pregnant you know make sure that they're well into a war against Hezbollah or Iran or whoever they decide to go to war with, if they do it now Trump won't be able to stop them because he's not president and Biden's barely a president and Harris is out on the road. So if you were going to make a big move and you're Israel it's going to happen now. So I would expect maximum chaos.
But there's also a possibility that Israel will have a surprisingly fast and good result in Lebanon because a lot of the Lebanese I'm hearing are not so pro-Hezbollah. So if Israel could find a way to be accurate enough to take out Hezbollah without killing much in the way of innocent Lebanese people who don't like Hezbollah either they might be able to find a workable situation there maybe. Imagine how different that would be if Lebanon were no longer an enemy of Israel or at least parts of it. So Hezbollah being bad actors and Hamas being bad actors maybe something can change. We'll see.
All right ladies and gentlemen that's all I have for you. I'm going to talk to the local subscribers privately because of their awesomeness but I'll see the rest of you on YouTube and Rumble and X tomorrow same time same place. Bye for now.
We've got 30 seconds to sip.
oh my god I've got this little itch right in the back of my back of my shoulders where I can't reach this is why you need the telescoping bag scratcher you should have one everywhere because there's this one little area I can't reach back there oh my god oh oh my god oh so good all right well if you didn't notice the dilber comic is uh up it's the reborn comic now normally Dilbert well not normally the the Dilbert comic and the Dilbert reborn comic typically um they don't do any politics so this isn't really politics it's just dog bir picking up on a meme but I thought you'd like it let me read it to you in case you're listening dogbe says to Dilbert they're just sitting around the breakfast table and dilber says I'm sorry doger says when the Hunter's bullet grazed my ear I dropped to the ground out of instinct then I jumped up and looked at the pack of wolves I had come to lead and yelled bite bite bite and he's raising his fist like Trump did your story and then dber says your story is inspiring but derivative and dogar says I didn't want to reinvent the wheel I mean stick with what works right people stick with what works anyway that's available only um on the yeah you have to subscribe to see dber reborn either on uh the locals platform Scott adams.
locals.com or or where's the show I'm trying to open it here it is huh um or you can see it on uh the X uh the xplatform if you subscribe oh by the way the 2025 dilber calendar is available for pre-sale the desk page a day desk calendar made in America for the first time and it's at uh if you go to dilbert.com you'll see the link for a pre-sale it's the only place you can get it it's not going to be on Amazon not now orever and it won't be in bookstores only one link it's the only way you can get it made in America good morning everybody and welcome to coffee with Scott Adams the greatest experience of your life if you'd like to take this up to levels that nobody can really understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a cuper muger glass a tanker shell s a canteen juger flask of vess of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dope mean the end of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous hip and it happens now go the best I wonder if the coffee is making me healthier well there's a new study that that's discussed in brink Zone that coffee increases your testosterone and your Anor robic power that's right a little bit of coffee and you'll be stronger and have more testosterone you want me to prove it watch this all right this is really good fabric on this t-shirt and I didn't want to hurt it anyway but trust me I could have if I tried a little harder well here's the kind of stories I see every day um lately so the Michigan mailin ballots are now only going to be counted if there's a proof of signature this is a gateway bundit reporting this to which I said to myself wait a minute are you telling me that in the past the Michigan mail and ballots didn't need any signature verification the most basic thing you would do no no and wait a minute wait a minute are you telling me that they're only just barely fixing this in time for the election that's right just a few weeks before the actual election but thank goodness thank goodness there's no other irregularity to report about the election well Jim Jordan has accused the Department of Homeland Security Secretary of uh stonewalling the Ohio election Integrity according to a raw story so Jim Jordan says the homeland security is refusing to respond to requests from Ohio's top election official for federal citizenship verification records I guess they want to make sure that the people who are voting are citizens but the Department of Homeland Security is stonewalling them do you know how many stories I see every day almost all of them on X about something that is clearly broken in our election system and somebody's trying to fix it now sometimes successfully sometimes they get stonewalled but if we have a pristine election system that we are quite all sure has been perfect why are so many things getting fixed are do people who we elect in various states are are they so dumb that they don't know the elections are perfect the way they are and they think they're fixing something that ain't broke or is it stuff that's really obviously broken and was obviously broken before and yet the new news that you thought was real told you well we know those elections were good yeah you can know what you don't know that's what the news told you here here's a list of things that can't be known that we know but wait you that can't be known yeah but we know it right but there isn't any way to know it but we know it well how do you know it well we didn't look into it no not looking into it is not how you know things well well there were no complaints that we saw but you just said you didn't look into it that's right so if you don't look into it you can be sure what happened exactly and that's actually what the news has been telling us for years and people just s at home going uhhuh uhhuh didn't look into it must be a good election I I can I can think of no better evidence of a good election then we didn't really look into it oh oh by the way it's designed so you can't fully audit it yeah just normal stuff nothing to be concerned about how many Democrats will hear either of those stories today how many Democrats are going to hear about Michigan not checking signatures in the past oh my God or or that uh we're not entirely sure who are citizens and should be able to vote do you think any Democrats will hear that no no it'll be basically zero um let's see what does the public think about election Integrity well it used to be that uh Republicans were confident in the system and Democrats thought it might be a little sketchy but according to Gallup that is somewhat reversed and now the Republicans think the elections are more sketchy than the Democrats but both sides think they're a little bit of sketchy so 57% of those ped by Gallup uh said that they will be um only somewhat confident in the accuracy of the election where 24% say they're not too confident and a whopping 19% say they're not confident at all I would have added those two together but only 57% of the public thinks they're very or even somewhat confident in the results does that sound about right to you does that sound like a system that's been designed to make us confident that we know what happened no I don't think you can get to only 57% think the election is fair and and reliable unless it's designed to keep you from knowing who won our elections let me say it again are very obviously very obviously designed so you don't know who one I think that's the only thing you need to know if you spent a few minutes looking at the design of the system and then I said to you all right would you know if the post office threw away some ballots no you would how would you know that how would you catch that in an audit there's no way to catch that no it's uncatchable uh if I told you that a state actor whether it's the CIA or some other country had worked with an Insider at one of the voting machines or tabulator companies and had hacked it with the help of an Insider to cover up any Trail would you be able to spot that no no you wouldn't no there's no way you could catch that what would be the most obvious way that anybody would cheat well one of those Ways How about if um somebody was a non-citizen and yet they had a they got a mail in vote and then they voted what part of the process checks all those names against Real voters well maybe some states do but not all of them so the most obvious ways that anybody would think of you know if you were going to think of a way to cheat none of them are checkable the most obvious ways you would cheat and so to imagine that you could know who won an election is is sort of just naive yeah but there we are so you then did a fact check on KL Harris's claims about manufacturing jobs so she said something about um Trump being bad and losing manufacturing jobs and Biden being good and getting them back but apparently he was just wildly you know incorrect just a lie basically but CNN fact checked them now here's my question have you noticed the selectivity of CNN's fact checking how many how many votes do you think got changed because somebody exaggerated or had a wrong data about manufacturing none none no e even if the Democrats heard that this was a fake claim and it was a lie there's probably not even one Democrat who's going to changed their vote because somebody exaggerated or you know said something about manufacturing jobs you've got two candidates who both say they want to bring manufacturing back to the us both of them are going to use hyperbole about their numbers both of them are going to choose a a period of time that makes their thing look good both of them are going to pad things it has no effect on the actual outcome of the vote now you know it would if they fact checked the hoaxes if they fact checked all the hoaxes every time she used one that would affect the election because nobody nobody thinks that an ordinary lie told by a politician is you know different or even noteworthy or nobody cares it's just part of the process but if you told if you told the CNN and msnb view Ms.
MSNBC viewers that their entire worldview was created by a a a mesh network of hoaxes that the media creates that would change some votes because we sought that a number of the people who said I've been a lifetime Democrat but I changed my vote the number one thing they point out is what's the number one thing that people mention when they say they changed to give up the Democrats the fine people hoax the fine people hoax is the T pole hoax meaning it's the one that keeps all the other hoaxes alive if you believed the fine people hoax then you accepted as a given that Trump was the worst person in the world and would say any crazy thing now since the find people hoax is not true then suddenly all the other hoaxes once you learn it's not true and how they did it and how and how blatantly it was done I think the thing about the fine people hoax is that you didn't have to really do research to to find out it was a lie and that the entire left-leaning media landscaped were all in on it they all knew the truth because they had the video too so that one's a real you know that that one just makes your brain go wait a minute what how badly were they lying to me because it's one thing when a candidate tells a lie like I said you just expect that but when the entire media landscape coordinates with the Democrats to tell you a lie like to fine people hoax that can change your mind when you find out that you were a victim of that and then that there are 20 more just like it there are 20 more the fine people hoax was just the T pole you still needed other you know polls to to hold things up but the main 10 pole was that one and I I'd like to say that I'm happy that I worked for seven years to De bunka you know Cortez Joel poock uh we all worked like the three of us just like work like maniacs for three years every time that popped up to make sure that people saw the counter you know the debunk anyway haris goes to the Border uh which gives I don't think anybody's having more fun in the last few months than Scott Jennings who is uh I guess he would represent the Republican opinion on CNN now I'd like to give CNN a a little bit of credit so I think it's it's prudent to call balls and Strikes and not just be you know in the bag for one team completely so the fact that uh Scott Jennings is not only very effective in his Communications on behalf of Republicans but he does get a lot of screen time he gets a lot of screen time he shows up in clips and um he's doing a hell of a job if if you haven't watched any of Scott Jennings debunking of the CNN people while they watch you have to watch it not just for what he says because he he does a great job of framing things but you have to watch the faces of the panelists when they're forced to listen to the truth on CNN because they all know they're Liars they're they're completely aware of what they're doing so when they give him time and they let him talk you just have to I've I reposted a few an acts if you want to see them you just have to see the faces while they listen they they try to do the the smug smile but the smile says I know you got us it's sort of a you know I'm I'm doing an impression now if you're hearing only audio it's that the smug smile it's toothless so a real smile shows your teeth usually here's a real smile see here's a real smile it's all teethy here here's a smile that says Scott Jennings is making you look like you have a brain the size of a squirrel and a million people are watching him do it while your face is on the screen yeah see that that's the face when you're being Dunked On by Scott Jennings on CNN M I'm happy I'm happy but not happy enough so you can see my teeth I'm so happy look at my smile I'm not even bothered by it at all I'm not even bothered by being called out as a ridiculous propagandist right in front of the world look at me smiling it's not bothering me a bit so that's hilarious I recommend it here's what Scott Jenning said uh when Harris went to the Border he said arsonist returns to scene of crime I told you he's going to reframing arsonist returns to scene of crime and we're done I I could continue talking about this topic of KL Harris visiting the Border but everything I say is just going to fit under this one reframe arsonist returns to scene of crime do I need to tell anybody that the Biden Administration is 100% responsible for everything we say or that she was the borders are or if you don't like using common words for stuff just just in control of things at the Border in some general way that never happened three and a half years of complete absolute failure to the point where it looks like intentional treason we don't know that it is but sure looks like it You Can't Fail Harder than she has failed and Biden has failed at the border You Can't Fail Harder than that and she returns to the scene of the crime like an arsonist anyway and uh Scott Jennings points out there was a huge Tactical mistake to just make sure that people were really paying attention to the Border while Harris tells you it's a giant problem while you say but you caused the problem why are you now acting like you don't know what caused it and why why are you there you should be hiding in shame for what you've done and the fact that she went to the border and simply made the Border issue more prominent in the news yeah that's What mattered what didn't matter were her clever little arguments and stuff about it no nobody cares about that all they care about is we spent more time thinking about criminals coming across the border now as luck would have it the the ice report came out at the same time saying that the number of criminals literally murderers and rapists were in the tens of thousands the ones we know about imagine how many people that maybe murdered somebody and got away with it and still came here so at the same time the public is being exposed we hope maybe no Democrats ever saw that data but it was national news at least on the right and I think Scott Jennings mentioned these numbers too so he he penetrated the CNN audience with that so at the same time we're seeing massive unreported until now numbers of criminals that we have deliberately deliberately led into the country at the same time we're seeing reports that Isis Isis is sneaking people into the country at the same time we're hearing that maybe I don't know Hezbollah or some other damn thing is coming in with shoulder-mounted missiles and there's a bunch of assassin teams coming through the border and there there are tens of thousands of Chinese military looking people coming through the Border we let everybody in it's the biggest failure in American politics yeah let me say that let me say that with a little bit of confidence in the history of American government opening the border the way it was done is the biggest mistake in American history if you could come up with a better example of a bigger mistake I don't know now and the thing is we haven't seen the uh the price of that yet the price is yet to be paid because we're letting in a whole bunch of terrorists at the same time Iran is going to go to war with Israel maybe we'll talk about that and what would Iran do what have we've been warned by the people who know how things work in this world what is Iran going to do if let's say Iran itself is attacked as opposed to its proxies they're going to attack inside the United States your lights are going to go off because Iran is not you know a me too follower kind of a country they have abilities they got skills and they're probably already in our cyber you they probably have already penetrated some of our systems they almost certainly have agents with weapons in the United States not that they're necessarily going to do an October 7th attack but they could certainly do things that we weren't sure if it was them or somebody else so it is in my opinion the biggest blunder in all of American government history I don't think there's a second place to that and I guess what's different about it is that it was obvious it was a blunder before they did it I mean it looks so much like somebody was trying to destroy the country it doesn't even look like this was ever a serious thing that somebody thought was a good idea it simply looks like somebody had a plan to destroy the country I'll talk more about that speaking of which Harris uh looked at the Trump border wall so she had to stand in front of the border wall that Trump built which at one point in 2019 she'd call that medieval vanity project and now she's all about building some more how do the Democrats not notice what's going on but they don't they don't seem to notice anyway um former Navy SEAL Shan Ryan who's got a podcast he was on Joe Rogan and he said the Taliban is funneling terrorist into the US to the southern border for some kind of October 7th style attack now I don't think Iran would want to do an October 7th in the United States but Isis might Isis might so that's all coming in and at the same time Harris is called for a pathway to citizenship for millions of uh of the migrants she led into the country I don't know how you could be worse to to create the biggest blunder in American history and then to top it by saying let's let's give them citizenship so they can also vote the level of incompetence is Way Beyond anything I could call accidental it doesn't look accidental nobody could be this dumb I mean nobody could really um so she gives a speech after she went to the border and uh I I would like to say as far as I could tell when she gave her speech she was not inebriated and I thought she did a great job so it was a teleprompter speech at first I thought maybe it was impromptu and I was more impressed but then when looked that oh it's teleprompter but the teleprompter she does really well now so I guess she's been doing a lot of practice on the campaign Trail but man she she read that teleprompter uh she did not cackle she had all the right motions and everything but I did note a few problems oh number one uh if you'd like to know when she's inebriated and when she's not there's a tell that is guaranteed right now I think you can tell by just the way she talks and and everything but there's one tell for whether she's inebriated and she definitely wasn't she was in full control and did a good job in Her speech here's here's her hand gestures when she's not inebriated they're crisp and they're smallish so so she'd be like dupe dupe crisp tight controlled so when she's talking her hands are very much part of a good uh presenter's hands now I'm going to give you the impression of when she's inebriated shoulders moving and hands are not tight they're all over the place let me tell you what we're going to do right that you you watch for it tight your hands D Dent Dent versus loose ants if you wonder if she's sometimes inebriated in public you only have to watch your speech where she's not once you see her operating at 100% as she was during her speech there's no doubt that the other thing is inebriated there's no doubt at all and you can even see that she's picking her spots when she does a national speech or a debate definitely not inebriated not not a s not a suggestion not a hint nothing but when she's talking to a friendly a friendly like a students or a little group of people who love her she's drunk as a we we've seen it so many times there's no doubt about it or inebriated in some fashion the other thing I haven't heard anybody say yet but uh let me be the first to point it out so she gives a speech that was largely about her you know getting serious about the Border did anybody notice that the speech was all about her here's what I expect when you've got a massive border problem and somebody's running for president here's what I'm going to do about the Border I'm going to build a wall I'm going to reverse the executive orders I'm going to get rid of this fake Asylum thing so that's what you would say if you came there to tell people how you're going to fix something but she's got a little problem because any of those ideas if they sound good somebody's going to say so why didn't you do that already Joe Biden says you're in charge of everything so she can't really come out and say Here's a bunch of stuff I'm going to do the only thing she said specifically she's going to she wants to create a path to citizenship which is making the problem better or worse worse the only concrete suggestion is something that whether you're on the left or the right you'd say well that's creating an incentive to come here that's that's worse that's not better that's worse but here's the here's the part that once you hear it if you listen to it again listen for this she only talked about herself the only time she talked about somebody else she talked about the poor migrants the non-citizens what she didn't talk about is the the pain and destruction so much that's coming on the American citizens so here's her talking about the Border I was a prosecutor okay we're not hiring you to be a prosecutor I have toured the tunnels okay I mean we all know there tunnels does that make you a little extra qualified because you've been in one you wouldn't believe how smooth the walls are of the tunnels under the Border okay well you know maybe it could be true that Trump is not aware how smooth the walls are on the tunnels under the Border that's not much of a selling point for you well Trump doesn't even know how smooth the walls are it's not like he's in favor of the the tunnels so she had she just went on forever the entire time I listened I didn't hear it all but the entire time I did listen she only talked about herself and none of it was relevant your prosecutor got it so because you're a prosecutor and your your entity prosecuted some people in this context what do you know that I don't know do do I not know that fenel is coming across the border and probably killed my stepson everybody knows that do you not know the cartels are in charge at the border do you not know that millions of people will come what is it we don't know that we're now educated because we know you were once a prosecutor and that the walls of the tunnels were shiny you got nothing you got nothing lady meanwhile the border patrol said yet another lie as with all things border related she she was nowhere to be found when we needed her she ignored the Border problems until she that she created over three years and admitted that the uh and separately admitted that the immigration system under her and Biden was broken so she said she was going to fix the problem but isn't that really admitting that she's the source of the problem too because it didn't happen under Trump he had it fixed well the amuse account on X says that comml Harris did some election interference by creating some campaign ads in which they had two people saying that they used to be Trump supporters but now they were in Pennsylvania and now they're not well it turns out that was fake they were not real voters well they might vote but there were actors who have always been lifelong Democrats so they got two lifelong Democrat actors to pretend that they switched here's my question for you how hard would it be for Trump to find some prominent Democrats who switched to him well not too hard RFK Jr.
Elon Musk Scott Adams Sachs there's pretty Amman there's pretty long list doy you know there's a long list he wouldn't have he wouldn't have to hire an actor Trump would not have to hire an actor to say I used to be Democrat but now I can't I can't just can't do it anymore but she had to hire actors they couldn't find any real people I should tell you something all right so here's my summary for today I mean I'm not ending but this this will capture my thoughts um I think it's kind of stunning the degree to which Democrats have legalized crime while turning the Department of Justice who should be fighting the crime into the criminals in other words lawfare Etc so let me let me just give you some examples so here's examples of of uh Democrats who are basically legalizing crime now that's a little hyperbole when I say legalizing crime but I'll give you the examples and you'll you'll see why the hyperbole FS uh they wanted to defund the police they wanted to stop uh and they stop arresting shoplifters up to a certain dollar Mount which caused you know stores to close and massive crime they're letting the homeless control the sidewalks with everything that brings with it they're creating an asylum path for migrants who are willing to lie the migrant process is is a legal process but not if you lie if you lie and say that you're coming for Asylum but you're really not coming for Asylum they have legalized that crime they've essentially made it legal to lie that you're here for Asylum because nobody's going to get punished for it and it's the obvious way to go if you're coming in they created The Sanctuary cities to thwart any legal processes about the uh the immigrants uh lie about the amount of uh crime incoming so they lied about how much crime is coming across the border they allowed teams of Assassins and terrorists into the country um they are pushing Dei which is literally legalized discrimination against white people white males that's illegal um they censor Americans via proxy this is the Mike Ben's stuff um where we know that the state department and the Democrats get European and other entities Brazilian to do the things that they couldn't legally do to Citizens so they just use external entities to put the pressure on you know X and other platforms Etc um so there're censoring that's you know they want to take your guns away of course there's a the rhetoric in bages and assassinations in my opinion they've got elections that can't be fully audited which supports criminal acts during the elections and in Manhattan apparently 60% of felonies are reduced to misdemeanors so that's Alvin brag 60% of felonies are reduced to misdemeanors now some are always I mean it's that's not the first time that's ever happened but 60% feels like a lot to me um and the Lesser charges are just released all right so that's a case of the Democrats making effectively legal not technically legal in every case but effectively legalizing crime across a whole broad range of important topics what did that do it made the entire country unsafe and inner cities extra extra unsafe but at the same time that they were making criminals legal they were making the people whose job it is to fight crime they turned them into criminals so they turn the criminals into legal things like oh yeah you could just just say Asylum and you could come in ah you could take up to $950 still technically illegal but we're not going to do much about it right so they legalized crime across a whole broad array of categories and then they took the people who were supposed to fight that crime and they literally turned them into to criminals because the lawfare against Trump in my opinion is purely criminal um the j6 um you know the the degree to which they were overcharged in my opinion is just purely criminal and they've canceled a lot of people for supporting Trump in the media and supporters and they've gone after his supporters are trying to take him down and if you put all this together it looks like a plan to destroy America it looks intentional now I usually avoid any kind of uh conspiracy theory that deep I try to because when you just look at a bunch of patterns it's easy to convince yourself that the patterns mean more than they do but holy hell that's a lot of pattern let me give you um yeah and apparently ice has known which means the administration is known they LED in 663 th000 people with criminal histories 13,000 were charged with were convicted of homicide convicted and they led him into the countryes 16,000 for sexual assaults and 1845 facing homicide charges now um speaking of Shuan Ryan in his podcast uh I'm going to ask you for a favor uh I watched a clip in which he had an author on just recently John Ryan did and I didn't catch the author's name or the name of his book so if you if you saw it and you probably did or maybe you could Google it for me could you put in the comments the name of the author once I tell you what the topic was you'll recognize it uh suddenly he gets his due credit because the author was very very convincing and here's a story that I heard from the author on Sean Ryan's podcast um and I'm interested if you've ever heard of this before so Obama wanted Dei and how it happened that it was everywhere in the country was somewhat clever and I'd never heard this before so you got a president who wants you know Dei to be a big thing and he worked with John Brennan and also with the various government entities and the idea was if you could get the government to push Dei and to really embrace it and also hire a lot of people for those agencies that are under the Dei umbrella that further will make Dei a big thing but here's the part I didn't realize before that if you make the government entities and agencies all Dei um Advocates they're going to force companies to be Dei because those companies need approvals and need you know need to work productively with entities within the government so all you have to do is get the government to push Dei and then the government will push you know each of the agencies and you know people who who have some control over individuals and companies can then push it themselves and apparently John Brenan has said it's one of his greatest accomplishments or the greatest accomplishment of his career was bringing Dei to the CIA when he was in charge of it and I believe that over 50% of the CIA now is women and that was part of his accomplishments he says so when I look at Dei which is literally illegal that is tearing the country apart and has created a system which guarantees incompetence not because of the individuals not because of anybody's genes or culture or chromosomes or DNA or anything like that that's a separate that's not in the conversation it's just that the pool of applicants to fulfill Dei is smallish and if you if you have to do it you're going to just hire less qualified people and what we should see under a Dei environment within one decade you should see every major institution crumble that would be the prediction that you could you could predict on paper and again not because of anybody's DNA not because of anybody's race or culture nothing to do with that it's just that if you force a constraint on a thing that's barely working in the first place which is you know the economy the the economy is always you know delicately between you know working great and failing there's always that small difference between huge economic success and well that didn't work and Dei is by far enough to move you from the great economic success to everything fell apart and we're not sure why just everything we tried to do didn't work you made a phone call to text support they couldn't help you you know basically nothing works so we are in that phase we are we are in the predictable stage of everything up because we have too many incompetent people in every organization and it was intentional now if you ask them they'd say we're trying to make you know the organizations look like America make sure everybody has opportunity I like all of that you know on paper I like it all it's just if the only way you can implement it is a bunch of managers saying I'm going to get fired unless I hire somebody who's a Dei person and even if I can't find a good one I'm GNA have to take a chance until everything falls apart and that's where we are everything's falling apart and honestly it's mostly Dei problem more than anything it's Dei now on top of that everything's more complicated every year so in theory that an average person who could do you know a reasonable job at something no longer can so the complexity of everything makes it so if you're not in the top 20% of capability you're not going to be able to do anything everything's just too hard you know back back when you know you just had to milk a cow oh almost everybody could do it all you had to do is shoot an animal and skin it well most people could do it with a little bit of practice but most people can't do most jobs now they're just too complicated anyway Frank luns says that uh the uh for the first time in a long time there are more people uh registered as Republicans than Democrats in the entire country did you see that coming I did not see that coming I I have to admit that one snuck up on me because you know what what it is about Republicans that really stands out and and I've always loved this about conservatives and Republicans they're really about just getting the work done they're not so much about making sure that everybody knows it so there's something about this number that says to me that Republicans just got to work and said we can't give up the country if there are more Democrats than there are Republicans we're all dead and so since the obvious solution to having more Democrats than Republicans is you register more Republicans they did now again Scott presler gets you know a huge bit of credit for what he did especially in Pennsylvania but there must be a lot more people working on this I I don't know is this the Lara Trump um part of the world I'm not sure if what she's doing is directly or indirectly related to this now some of this might be that the Democrats did such a bad job that people are hiding as Independents because I think that happens if if if Biden is just embarrassing people will say um I'm uh uh let's say I'm an independent yeah not my fault sure I voted for him but now I'm independent now I'm independent so some of it is fake people just hiding because they don't want to take the heat but it's never been this way before and it's not even that close there's 48% Republican and 45% Democrat now there's still so many um wait a minute this can't be right how's that no that's not right these numbers can't be right because that would mean that The Independents are no this can't be right I thought Independents were about a third of Voters am I wrong about that the last time I saw these numbers The Independents Democrats and Republicans were roughly about the same number and this would this would suggest that there are very few Independents so that can't be right all right I'm going to uh I'm going to Pivot my Pivot is there's something wrong with these numbers it could be that they're only comparing people who who are registered one way or the other which you know I would need more detail to know if that's what's happening but let's say that uh let's say the numbers are true what would that suggest would be the likely um vote if there really are more Republicans registered than Democrats who would win the not the electoral vote but the overall National vote should be the one who's got the most people registered because that's what it's been before you know whe there were more Democrats and sure enough they won the national vote even when they lost the uh you know the Electoral College so what would be the result hypothetically if these numbers held and let's say let's say um Independence we don't know this but let's say independence match to this these ratios I think Independence are going to be far more for Trump but let's say it's just this much that would suggest a landslide right if Trump wins the popular vote Nationwide the electoral vote is a landslide now I need somebody smart to tell me I'm wrong about that but I think I'm right so you've got the you've got the national polls which uh depending on how they wait things and how they ask the question and you know some assumptions that they make when they collect their data they look a little sketchy don't they now the national polls sometimes say Comm ahead sometimes by a lot sometimes they say Trump's ahead sometimes by a good amount so the national polls appear to be completely funky and unreliable at this moment but do you think that we can accurately count how many people have registered as Republicans versus Democrats yes because that doesn't require an assumption and it doesn't require any there there's not much room for weasel it's probably just a data that you're either registered or you're not so if you're going to believe one what would be more believable that the Republican registrations have surged which would indicate a landslide for Trump or that the uh individual polls which we've never trusted in the past and always seem to get mysteriously accurate right toward the election sort of in October do you do you know what the October surprise is yet one of them there's probably going to be lots of them have you figured out the October surprise well if this is true the Republican um registrations have now outnumbered Democrat registrations this election is over in terms of voting is you know I'm going to agree with Eric Weinstein that we don't know if Trump will become president because the the Bad actors looks like there's no limits to what they'd be willing to do and I mean actually no limits so I think Trump probably has a dominant position and it looks like a landslide if nothing changes but remember going to be lots of changes so here's what I think will be your October surprise now can't guarantee it can't guarantee it but the pollsters are all going to be showing a Landslide by election day because if they don't if they don't then next election you're going to say um there was a landslide and you weren't even close why should we listen to you again why should we pay you for your for your stuff why should we ever report what you said again so it becomes really important for the pollsters to end up in the top five top 10 so if they're way off a few weeks before election which is what October the October surprise is going to be the polls now you knew it was going to happen but here's the surprise it's going to be bigger than you thought I think the surprise is going to be the the degree of poller shenanigans that are happening in September are beyond what you imagined was possible that's that's what I think will be your surprise now I could be wrong right it'd be easy to be wrong about this but when you see the if you see the people on the streets um I just saw another person on the street thing they're asking just young people who they supported it seems to be Trump every time somebody goes on the street and even if maybe it was always you know close to half and half the Trump supporters who are young will say it out loud with no embarrassment whatsoever as if it's the cooler thing to do now and once you see how many 20-some people are are you know just yelling Trump into the the camera so happy to support him perfectly happy that that they're seen by their their other fellow students seen by whoever is going to see the video there's nothing holding it back Trump and I think I think it's because eating the dogs I think eating the dogs eating the cats is what made him popular with young people well plus you know the assassination attempt was you know remarkable you know the the fight fight fight part but the the cats and the dogs thing is still trending on Tik Tok and when you see people's reaction to him and you see the number of people who are still dancing to that something's happening something Big's happening all right of course you know the big news is Israel took out the head of Hezbollah with a gigantic set of bombs bunker Busters I guess yes so here's what happened see how impressed you are by this so uh Hezbollah has like reportedly I don't know 100,000 rockets that could be fired at Israel if they were to fire them all at the same time or in big waves then the Iron Dome would have a tough time getting them all just because of numbers so really the threat that hezel had was that will fire them in big waves at the same time it wasn't really a risk if they did you know one here or there the Iron Dome could get them and chances are it was wasn't going to hit anything anyway so what do you think it takes for hzb to fire all of their stuff at the same time well coordination obviously coordination and what does that take well some kind of communication and what does that take well you're going to have to use some kind of digital communication and apparently because they thought the cell phones could be too easily tracked by Israel they had moved to pagers and walkie-talkies which as you know Israel found a way to make explody so once all their pagers and walkie-talkies exploded what's next well the first thing that you might not realize is that they may have lost their ability to coordinate an attack CU if they don't do it all at the same time they're just wasting their missiles send up three missiles Israel knocks down three missiles and you're done so if you can't shoot them all at the same time you've lost your only weapon the you know the one that anybody's worried about so I can't say for sure that they lost that ability but they haven't launched a big wave of missiles and they did lose all of their leadership and the last guy that was left said to himself huh I'm going to have to figure out how to rebuild and get things coordinated again but I better not use any digital means so send out the runners and get the the I don't know the third level down of commanders because the other ones have all been killed and we'll we'll meet in my uh my command bunker yeah we're whatever's left of the leadership of Hezbollah after most of it's already been killed we're going to meet in my well-known command bunker my well-known well-identified command bunker knowing that there are obviously spies working because without the spies Israel would not have been able to kill all of the top guys Commander already wherever they were they got them all which very heavily suggests there's an Insider who's saying um he's in a blue car he's heading down the street now so the head of Hezbollah clearly not a strategic genius decided to get what was left of Hezbollah to meet him in person in his command bunker well what do you think happened then I'm not supposed to laugh at War but did this really happen did Israel really figure out a way to kill all the leaders and then make sure that the new team of leaders all went in the same place at the same time and that they would know where they were and when they were there and then they would drop a bunch of Bunker Busters on it and just make it a hole in the ground well there's nothing funny about this situation but Hezbollah had been telling a lot of lies and Israel decided to debunker him that's right they debunker him uh and when they were done uh the thing that used to be called a command bunker uh looked a lot like Justin Bieber's sphincter after a diddy party I I'll just let you live with that one for a while take your time take your time whenever you're done we'll get back to it okay yeah look like Justin Bieber's spincter spincter after a diddy party anyway uh we don't see them uh firing back a whole bunch of missiles uh Iran apparently had a big old meeting and Iran thinks some people are saying Iran is going to send some um somebody said Iran might send some troops to Lebanon I don't know if that's a good idea for them but uh it gets better apparently Israel hacked the airport control tower for uh for Lebanon Beirut I guess and uh since we know that Iran apparently was shipping in supplies and weapons to Hezbollah uh they got to the control tower took it over with hackers and told the planes they better turn around because they're in trouble if they land and and there's some evidence that one of the planes that was coming from Iran to Lebanon turned around immediately turned around immediately which means it was probably full of weapons don't know for sure but maybe well if any of this is true uh Israel basically just rewrote all the war books about how you do anything the the level of Brilliance that appears to be here now remember this is still fog of War propaganda you know we're we're getting a version of the news that says Israel is beyond brilliant so just just be careful that you're maybe not seeing all the warts you know maybe things weren't as clean and maybe there was some luck involved and so we don't know everything but if we were just to judge it on the surface it would be the greatest military strategic success of my life I mean the the amount that I am impressed by what Israel's done militarily and again I want to if somebody is new to me I don't back uh Israel because they don't back me it's not my job to back Israel now they're an ally and I take that seriously but I'm an American so I'm sitting over are carrying what's good for me you know Israel is just something I'm observing and sometimes I say to myself all right if that happened to America how would we act well we're full of Dei so we couldn't get we couldn't pull that off but I wish we could I wish we were that smart anyway um there's a uh there's a new drone South Korea made a drone that works on hydrogen it's a hydrogen drone Tech times says so this is it's got a 5,800 mile range and can stay in the air for hours compared to 30 minutes for a normal drone so if you've got something that can lift um some weight and can go 5,800 miles and stay in the air for hours the degree of warfare you can do with small drones because these would be smallish ones is a whole new level so um I don't know how close we are to an all robot war where it's just drones in the sky because you don't want to waste a pilot and um you know robot dogs on the ground we're pretty close we're pretty close we might actually get to the point where if the robots on one side defeat the robots on the other that the humans will Just Surrender rather than send humans to fight their robots which would just be Slaughter we'll just say all right you robots beat our robots we don't like it but you're in charge now you own our country we're getting there I think you'll see it in your lifetime um judge chuckin according to Jeff Clark she she's uh gaming with the uh the timing of things so that few weeks before the election there would be some kind of reveal from Jack Smith so Jack Smith the da he's got some materials that are we haven't seen But the redacted version might come out mid October now whatever a prosecutor of trump produces in mid October is going to be bad for Trump now do you think it's a huge coincidence that the Badness would come out at the very worst time do we expect that whatever Badness he produces is real like actually in context and accurate nope I do not believe that I believe that they would because remember Department of Justice are criminals and the criminals are now legal so this would be the Department of Justice now they're criminals um so the criminal thing to do would be to make up a bunch of and know that there's no time to correct it before the election and and just depend on the uh the fake news to say it's all true and then after the election you do the fact check it's like oh oh yeah I guess I guess this wasn't as true as we thought sorry about that yeah yeah sorry that's what it looks like well one of my favorite things yesterday was that Trump and zinski met now that's unusual because Trump is not the sitting president so that you you have to be delicate about what you can and cannot do in that situation but I loved the press conference after where Trump his 6'3 is standing over zinski is 56 or whatever he is and zalinski just looked like he' just been punished by his parents like he looked like a defeated he didn't look like zalinsky of old give us weapons we'll fight every day we win and and Trump is just saying what was Trump saying he was saying uh basically it's over we need to negotiate a deal you know we'll just figure out who gets what land we'll sort it out now that's when zalinski in the past would have said something like no we will fight we must get every inch of land back we will never quit they can't steal our land the best he could do because he knows there's a good chance he's going to be dealing with Trump in the future the best he could do is remind us that Russia is on Ukrainian land and so when they negotiate you know that should be top of mind but even he was talking about negotiating now correct me if I'm wrong so now zalinsky seems on board with negotiating and obviously some kind of land agreement will have to happen Putin of course is interested in negotiating and they're the two sides who's not interested in negotiating Democrats and the Deep State and the military-industrial complex but if you put Trump in there there's nobody left who wants the war zalinsky doesn't really want any more of it you know he love to win but doesn't seem to be an option so forget about that yeah all it takes is a president Trump now when he'd been saying he could get it done in a day you know that's hyperbole nobody could do it in a day but basically he could because all it takes is Trump to be president and then there's nobody in the game who wants to keep fighting because Ukraine and Russia definitely don't they definitely don't and as long as Trump doesn't there's nobody left so yes he could wind it up soon as he gets in there I I wonder if Trump actually worried that he could end the war before he got in office and before there's even an election so that it wouldn't count in his benefit on the election but if you want to end this war you now have a 100% obvious way to do it that you control as a citizen you can just vote for Trump and this war is over it really is all right Bill Maher had a show last night we always talk about him he is you know I know it bothers some people that bill Mah is always at discussion the next day because blah blah blah um but he is a a good indicator of what people are thinking and on that basis it's fascinating and uh he actually said that uh we should defend Ukraine um and that it's basically so little money for the United States that we're you getting some benefit of degrading Russia we're protecting our Ally kind of an ally um and and this is what Mars says about the money uh he says that basically none of us know that none of us can tell the difference the amount of money we spent in Ukraine he's saying that you you and I don't feel it to which I say have you heard of inflation now I don't know how much of the um let's see if our if our deficit per year is in the over a trillion dollar range is it like 1.3 trillion somewhere in that range and how much do we give to um Ukraine every year a few hundred billion do we spend a few hundred billion per year so maybe 15% of our deficit something like that and then of course we have to build up our own military because you know we're we're spending sending our bullets over there so we got to buy our own bullets or something so um he is correct that we cannot identify the difference in our life from the Ukraine expenses I can't identify okay how much of my inflation was because that war might be 10% but it's also not ending and the amount we're spending isn't really the total issue it's about whether we should be having a war with a nuclear power and what are we getting from it and is it worth 200 billion and if we've got 200 billion extra to spend on anything is that where you want it to go because 200 billion is real money um anyway so far the it's been 10 billion here 7 billion in there I don't know what it adds up to and um all right V ramaswami says that uh musk is super hardcore about firing federal employees working with Trump and I saw this on the George account good account to follow on X George H he's Ras Swami said it looks like Elon will use OIC on the government's fat and here's a quote elon's pretty hardcore and V says I said 75% of the federal bureaucrats he said you need to put at least 75 so Elon musk's correction to V who wanted to get rid of 75% of the bureaucrats was you should say at least how much do you love that how much do you love that that if you could imagine that you could ever get rid of 75% of the de the bureaucrats um that you should really be saying more I I just love that I don't know that they can get rid of more than 75% but the fact that he's not going to be limited by your 75% estimate I love that it's at least 75% anyway um according to the Gateway pundit Antonio Gro writer he's got an argument in there opinion piece that liberal policies are driving up our obesity rates now up to 40% of the adults or is it everybody uh 40% are obese I don't know if that's 40% of oh yeah it is adults and 20% of children now when I saw that opinion I said to myself I don't know if I want to read this because I don't think he's going to convince me that liberal policies are making people fat because I said to myself how how how are liberal policies making anybody fat explain that and he talked about how school gym classes are cutting way back so kids are less active in school and I said H Public Schools okay Democrats pretty much have a lock on everything that happens in the public school so yeah I guess okay yeah less physical activity sure uh then there's fat acceptance the idea that Democrats are pushing the idea that you don't need to lose weight you're perfectly healthy nobody should judge you and while I agree with the notion that I don't like fat shaming there's no question that the public attitude toward toward it has an impact on how people act right if people say you're fine you can be any weight you want there's going to be more people overweight if if the public says cruy cruy don't be like that there's probably going to be less of it people are going to try harder now there might also be some uh food related uh illnesses but that's a separate question I'm talking about anorexia for example um there are food deserts now in a lot of poor areas because uh the crime was so high that uh places that would sell you healthier food like a grocery store just said oh we're out here's there's still Mc.
Donald's so good luck that feels fair and then of course the pandemic and the lockdown had some lasting effects so I'm not sure uh you know how much of the Obesity is because of liberal policies but I do think that Antonio made his case he made his case it it's just we can't tell what percentage of the whole problem is caused by that but it's not making it better anyway there's now jets that are going to be able to do automatic takeoffs and landings according to CNN um and if he didn't know this and this is weird uh the more advanced planes could already land in bad weather and stuff um on instruments well it could it could land autonomously so even if the pilot dropped dead the advanced planes could just land and and the landing some say they the machine would do it better than the pilot pilot can make a human error the machines much less likely but what I didn't know is that the um the planes were not equipped to take off with an a pilot which seems weird it seems like taking off would be easier than Landing but taking off is actually harder I mean where it can be so it's actually a big deal that airplanes are learning to take off on their own at the same time that uh Robo taxis are coming on so the idea of having a human sitting behind a steering wheel for anything it will be largely defunct except for recreational stuff like I don't know maybe your fishing boat or something anyway and that ladies and gentlemen is all I wanted to say that's worth saying today uh we'll keep an eye on whatever is happening with Hezbollah and Israel but uh as I've said before if Israel's going to get tough with its its enemies and neighbors there's never been a better time in history to do it because first of all it seems like they have you know good handle on the the military strategy obviously but also there's no leadership in the United States so if they can get themselves a little bit pregnant you know make sure that they're well into a war against Hezbollah or ran or whoever they decide to go to war with um if they do it now Trump won't be B to stop him because he's not president and Biden's barely a president and Harris is out in the road so if you were going to make a big move um and you're Israel it's going to happen now so I would expect maximum chaos um but there's also a possibility that Israel will have a surprisingly fast and good result in Lebanon because a lot of the Lebanese I'm hearing are not so pro- esbah so if Israel could find a way to be um let's say accurate enough to take out Hezbollah without killing much in the way of innocent Lebanese people who don't like Les hezb either they might be able to find a workable situation there maybe imagine how different that would be if Lebanon were no longer an enemy of Israel or at least parts of it so Hezbollah being Bad actors and Hamas Being Bad actors maybe something can change we'll see all right ladies and gentlemen that's all I have for you I'm going to talk to the local subscribers privately because of their awesomeness but uh I'll see the rest of you on You.
Tube and Rumble and X tomorrow same time same place bye for now we've got 30 seconds to sip e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
oh my god I've got this little itch
right in the back of
my back of my shoulders where I can't
reach this is why you need the
telescoping bag scratcher you should
have one everywhere because there's this
one little area I can't reach back there
oh my god oh oh my god oh so
good all
right well if you didn't notice the
dilber comic is uh up it's the reborn
comic now normally Dilbert well not
normally the the Dilbert comic and the
Dilbert reborn comic
typically um they don't do any
politics so this isn't really politics
it's just dog bir picking up on a
meme but I thought you'd like it let me
read it to you in case you're listening
dogbe says to Dilbert they're just
sitting around the breakfast table and
dilber says I'm sorry doger says when
the Hunter's bullet grazed my ear I
dropped to the ground out of instinct
then I jumped up and looked at the pack
of wolves I had come to lead and yelled
bite bite bite and he's raising his fist
like Trump did your story and then dber
says your story is inspiring but
derivative and dogar says I didn't want
to reinvent the wheel I mean stick with
what works right people stick with what
works anyway that's available
only um on the
yeah you have to subscribe to see dber
reborn either on uh the locals platform
Scott adams. locals.com
or or where's the show I'm trying to
open it here it
is
huh
um or you can see it on uh the X uh the
xplatform if you
subscribe oh by the way the 2025 dilber
calendar is available for pre-sale the
desk page a day desk calendar made in
America for the first time and it's at
uh if you go to dilbert.com you'll see
the link for a pre-sale it's the only
place you can get it it's not going to
be on Amazon not now orever and it won't
be in bookstores only one link it's the
only way you can get it made in
America good morning everybody and
welcome to coffee with Scott Adams the
greatest experience of your life if
you'd like to take this up to levels
that nobody can really understand with
their tiny shiny human brains all you
need for
that
is a cuper muger glass a tanker shell s
a canteen juger flask of vess of any
kind fill it with your favorite liquid I
like coffee and join me now for the
unparallel pleasure the dope mean the
end of the day the thing that makes
everything better it's called the
simultaneous hip and it happens now
go the
best I wonder if the coffee is making me
healthier well there's a new study that
that's discussed in brink Zone that
coffee increases your testosterone and
your Anor robic power that's right a
little bit of coffee and you'll be
stronger and have more testosterone you
want me to prove it watch this
[Music]
all right this is really good fabric on
this t-shirt and I didn't want to hurt
it anyway but trust me I could have if I
tried a little
harder well here's the kind of stories I
see every day um lately so the Michigan
mailin ballots are now only going to be
counted if there's a proof of signature
this is a gateway bundit reporting this
to which I said to myself wait a minute
are you telling me that in the past the
Michigan mail and ballots didn't need
any signature
verification the most basic thing you
would do no no and wait a minute wait a
minute are you telling me that they're
only just barely fixing this in time for
the
election that's right just a few weeks
before the actual
election but thank goodness
thank goodness there's no other
irregularity to report about the
election well Jim Jordan has accused the
Department of Homeland Security
Secretary of uh stonewalling the Ohio
election Integrity according to a raw
story so Jim Jordan says the homeland
security is refusing to respond to
requests from Ohio's top election
official for federal citizenship
verification records I guess they want
to make sure that the people who are
voting are citizens but the Department
of Homeland Security is stonewalling
them do you know how many stories I see
every day almost all of them on X about
something that is clearly broken in our
election system and somebody's trying to
fix it now sometimes successfully
sometimes they get
stonewalled but if we have a pristine
election system
that we are quite all sure has been
perfect why are so many things getting
fixed are do people who we elect in
various states are are they so dumb that
they don't know the elections are
perfect the way they are and they think
they're fixing something that ain't
broke or is it stuff that's really
obviously broken and was obviously
broken before and yet the new news that
you thought was real told you well we
know those elections were good yeah you
can know what you don't know that's what
the news told you here here's a list of
things that can't be known that we know
but wait you that can't be known yeah
but we know it right but there isn't any
way to know it but we know it well how
do you know it well we didn't look into
it no not looking into it is not how you
know things well well there were no
complaints that we saw but you just said
you didn't look into it that's
right so if you don't look into it you
can be sure what happened
exactly and that's actually what the
news has been telling us for
years and people just s at home going
uhhuh uhhuh didn't look into it must be
a good
election I I can I can think of no
better evidence of a good election then
we didn't really look into it oh oh by
the way it's designed so you can't fully
audit
it yeah just normal stuff nothing to be
concerned
about how many Democrats will hear
either of those stories today how many
Democrats are going to hear about
Michigan not checking signatures in the
past oh my God or or that uh we're not
entirely sure who are citizens and
should be able to vote do you think any
Democrats will hear that no no it'll be
basically
zero um let's see what does the public
think about election Integrity well it
used to be that uh Republicans were
confident in the system and Democrats
thought it might be a little sketchy but
according to Gallup that is somewhat
reversed and now the Republicans think
the elections are more sketchy than the
Democrats but both sides think they're a
little bit of sketchy
so
57% of those ped by Gallup uh said that
they will be um only somewhat confident
in the accuracy of the election where
24% say they're not too confident and a
whopping 19% say they're not confident
at all I would have added those two
together but only 57% of the public
thinks they're very or even somewhat
confident in the results does that sound
about right to you
does that sound like a system that's
been designed to make us confident that
we know what
happened no I don't think you can get to
only
57% think the election is
fair and and
reliable unless it's designed to keep
you from knowing who won our elections
let me say it again are very obviously
very obviously designed so you don't
know who
one I think that's the only thing you
need to know if you spent a few minutes
looking at the design of the system and
then I said to you all right would you
know if the post office threw away some
ballots no you would how would you know
that how would you catch that in an
audit there's no way to catch that no
it's uncatchable uh if I told you that a
state actor whether it's the CIA or some
other country had worked with an Insider
at one of the voting machines or
tabulator companies and had hacked it
with the help of an Insider to cover up
any Trail would you be able to spot that
no no you wouldn't no there's no way you
could catch that what would be the most
obvious way that anybody would cheat
well one of those Ways How about if um
somebody was a
non-citizen and yet they had a they got
a mail in vote and then they
voted what part of the process checks
all those names against Real
voters well maybe some states do but not
all of
them so the most obvious ways that
anybody would think of you know if you
were going to think of a way to cheat
none of them are checkable the most
obvious ways you would cheat and so to
imagine that you could
know who won an election is is sort of
just
naive yeah but there we
are so you then did a fact check on KL
Harris's claims about manufacturing jobs
so she said something about um Trump
being bad and losing manufacturing jobs
and Biden being good and getting them
back but apparently he was just
wildly you know incorrect just a lie
basically but CNN fact checked them now
here's my question
have you noticed the selectivity of
CNN's fact
checking how many how many votes do you
think got changed because somebody
exaggerated or had a wrong data about
manufacturing none
none no e even if the Democrats heard
that this was a fake claim and it was a
lie there's probably not even one
Democrat who's going to changed their
vote because somebody exaggerated or you
know said something about manufacturing
jobs you've got two candidates who both
say they want to bring manufacturing
back to the us both of them are going to
use hyperbole about their numbers both
of them are going to choose a a period
of time that makes their thing look good
both of them are going to pad
things it has no effect on the actual
outcome of the vote now you know it
would if they fact checked the hoaxes if
they fact checked all the hoaxes every
time she used one that would affect the
election because nobody nobody thinks
that an ordinary lie told by a
politician is you know different or even
noteworthy or nobody cares it's just
part of the process but if you told if
you told the CNN and msnb view Ms MSNBC
viewers that their entire worldview was
created by a a a mesh network of hoaxes
that the media
creates that would change some votes
because we sought that a number of the
people who said I've been a lifetime
Democrat but I changed my vote the
number one thing they point out is
what's the number one thing that people
mention when they say they changed to
give up the
Democrats the fine people hoax the fine
people hoax is the T pole hoax
meaning it's the one that keeps all the
other hoaxes alive if you believed the
fine people hoax then you accepted as a
given that Trump was the worst person in
the world and would say any crazy
thing now since the find people hoax is
not true then suddenly all the other
hoaxes once you learn it's not true and
how they did it and how and how
blatantly it was done I think the thing
about the fine people hoax is that you
didn't have to really do research to to
find out it was a lie and that the
entire left-leaning media landscaped
were all in on it they all knew the
truth because they had the video too so
that one's a real you know that that one
just makes your brain go wait a minute
what how badly were they lying to me
because it's one thing when a candidate
tells a lie like I said you just expect
that but when the entire media landscape
coordinates with the Democrats to tell
you a lie like to fine people
hoax that can change your
mind when you find out that you were a
victim of that and then that there are
20 more just like it there are 20 more
the fine people hoax was just the T pole
you still needed other you know polls to
to hold things up but the main 10 pole
was that one and I I'd like to say that
I'm happy that I worked for seven years
to De bunka you know Cortez Joel poock
uh we all worked like the three of us
just like work like maniacs for three
years every time that popped up to make
sure that people saw the counter you
know the
debunk anyway haris goes to the Border
uh which gives I don't think anybody's
having more fun in the last few months
than Scott Jennings who is uh I guess he
would represent the Republican opinion
on CNN now I'd like to give CNN a a
little bit of credit so I think it's
it's prudent to call balls and Strikes
and not just be you know in the bag for
one team completely so the fact that uh
Scott Jennings is not only very
effective in his Communications on
behalf of Republicans but he does get a
lot of screen time he gets a lot of
screen time he shows up in clips and um
he's doing a hell of a job if if you
haven't watched any of Scott Jennings
debunking of the CNN people while they
watch you have to watch it not just for
what he says because he he does a great
job of framing things but you have to
watch the faces of the panelists when
they're forced to listen to the truth on
CNN because they all know they're
Liars they're they're completely aware
of what they're doing so when they give
him time and they let him talk you just
have to I've I reposted a few an acts if
you want to see them you just have to
see the faces while they listen they
they try to do the the smug smile but
the smile says I know you got us it's
sort of
a you know I'm I'm doing an impression
now if you're hearing only audio it's
that the smug
smile it's toothless so a real smile
shows your teeth usually here's a real
smile see here's a real smile it's all
teethy here here's a smile that says
Scott Jennings is making
you look like you have a brain the size
of a squirrel and a million people are
watching him do it while your face is on
the
screen yeah see that that's the face
when you're being Dunked On by Scott
Jennings on
CNN M I'm happy I'm happy but not happy
enough so you can see my
teeth I'm so happy look at my smile I'm
not even bothered by it at all I'm not
even bothered by being called out as a
ridiculous
propagandist right in front of the
world look at me smiling it's not
bothering me a
bit so that's hilarious I recommend
it here's what Scott Jenning
said uh when Harris went to the Border
he said arsonist returns to scene of
crime I told you he's going to reframing
arsonist returns to scene of crime and
we're
done I I could continue talking about
this topic of KL Harris visiting the
Border but everything I say is just
going to fit under this one reframe
arsonist returns to scene of crime do I
need to tell anybody that the Biden
Administration is 100% responsible for
everything we say or that she was the
borders are or if you don't like using
common words for stuff just just in
control of things at the Border in some
general way that never happened three
and a half years of complete absolute
failure to the point where it looks like
intentional treason we don't know that
it is but sure looks like it You Can't
Fail Harder than she has failed and
Biden has failed at the border You Can't
Fail Harder than that and she returns to
the scene of the crime like an
arsonist
anyway and uh Scott Jennings points out
there was a huge Tactical mistake to
just make sure that people were really
paying attention to the
Border while Harris tells you it's a
giant
problem while you
say but you caused the problem why are
you now acting like you don't know what
caused it and why why are you there you
should be hiding in shame for what
you've done and the fact that she went
to the border and simply made the Border
issue more prominent in the
news yeah that's What mattered what
didn't matter were her clever little
arguments and stuff about it no nobody
cares about that all they care about is
we spent more time thinking about
criminals coming across the border now
as luck would have it the the ice report
came out at the same time saying that
the number of criminals literally
murderers and rapists were in the tens
of
thousands the ones we know about
imagine how many people that maybe
murdered somebody and got away with it
and still came here so at the same time
the public is being exposed we hope
maybe no Democrats ever saw that data
but it was national news at least on the
right and I think Scott Jennings
mentioned these numbers too so he he
penetrated the CNN audience with that so
at the same time we're seeing massive
unreported until now numbers of
criminals that we have deliberately
deliberately led into the country at the
same time we're seeing reports that
Isis Isis is sneaking people into the
country at the same time we're hearing
that maybe I don't know Hezbollah or
some other damn thing is coming in with
shoulder-mounted missiles and there's a
bunch of assassin teams coming through
the border and there there are tens of
thousands of Chinese military looking
people coming through the
Border we let everybody in it's the
biggest failure in American
politics yeah let me say that let me say
that with a little bit of
confidence in the history of American
government opening the border the way it
was
done is the biggest mistake in American
history if you could come up with a
better example of a bigger
mistake I don't know now and the thing
is we haven't seen the uh
the price of that yet the price is yet
to be paid because we're letting in a
whole bunch of terrorists at the same
time Iran is going to go to war with
Israel maybe we'll talk about that and
what would Iran do what have we've been
warned by the people who know how things
work in this world what is Iran going to
do if let's say Iran itself is attacked
as opposed to its proxies they're going
to attack inside the United States your
lights are going to go off because Iran
is not you know a me too follower kind
of a country they have abilities they
got skills and they're probably already
in our cyber you they probably have
already penetrated some of our systems
they almost certainly have agents with
weapons in the United States not that
they're necessarily going to do an
October 7th
attack but they could certainly do
things that we weren't sure if it was
them or somebody else
so it is in my opinion the biggest
blunder in all of American government
history I don't think there's a second
place to
that and I guess what's different about
it is that it was obvious it was a
blunder before they did it I mean it
looks so much like somebody was trying
to destroy the country it doesn't even
look like this was ever a serious thing
that somebody thought was a good idea it
simply looks like somebody had a plan to
destroy the country I'll talk more about
that speaking of
which Harris uh looked at the Trump
border wall so she had to stand in front
of the border wall that Trump built
which at one point in 2019 she'd call
that medieval vanity project and now
she's all about building some more how
do the Democrats not notice what's going
on but they don't they don't seem to
notice
anyway
um former Navy SEAL Shan Ryan who's got
a podcast he was on Joe Rogan and he
said the Taliban is funneling terrorist
into the US to the southern border for
some kind of October 7th style attack
now I don't think Iran would want to do
an October 7th in the United
States but Isis
might Isis might
so that's all coming in and at the same
time Harris is called for a pathway to
citizenship for millions of uh of the
migrants she led into the
country I don't know how you could be
worse to to create the biggest blunder
in American history and then to top it
by saying let's let's give them
citizenship so they can also
vote the level of incompetence is Way
Beyond anything I could call accidental
it doesn't look
accidental nobody could be this dumb I
mean nobody could
really um so she gives a speech after
she went to the border and uh I I would
like to say as far as I could tell when
she gave her speech she was not
inebriated and I thought she did a great
job so it was a teleprompter speech at
first I thought maybe it was impromptu
and I was more impressed but then when
looked that oh it's teleprompter but the
teleprompter she does really well now so
I guess she's been doing a lot of
practice on the campaign Trail but man
she she read that
teleprompter uh she did not cackle she
had all the right motions and
everything but I did note a few
problems oh number one uh if you'd like
to know when she's inebriated and when
she's not there's a tell that is
guaranteed
right now I think you can tell by just
the way she talks and and everything but
there's one tell for whether she's
inebriated and she definitely wasn't she
was in full control and did a good job
in Her speech here's here's her hand
gestures when she's not inebriated
they're crisp and they're smallish so so
she'd be like dupe dupe crisp tight
controlled so when she's talking her
hands are very much part of a good uh
presenter's hands now I'm going to give
you the impression of when she's
inebriated shoulders moving and hands
are not tight they're all over the
place let me tell you what we're going
to
do right that you you watch for it tight
your hands D Dent Dent versus loose ants
if you wonder if she's sometimes
inebriated in public you only have to
watch your speech where she's
not once you see her operating at
100% as she was during her
speech there's no doubt that the other
thing is
inebriated there's no doubt at all and
you can even see that she's picking her
spots when she does a national speech or
a debate definitely not
inebriated not not a s
not a suggestion not a hint nothing but
when she's talking to a
friendly a friendly like a students or a
little group of people who love her
she's drunk as a
we we've seen it so many times
there's no doubt about it or inebriated
in some
fashion the other thing I haven't heard
anybody say yet but uh let me be the
first to point it out so she gives a
speech that was largely about her you
know getting serious about the Border
did anybody notice that the speech was
all about
her here's what I expect when you've got
a massive border problem and somebody's
running for president here's what I'm
going to do about the Border I'm going
to build a wall I'm going to reverse the
executive orders I'm going to get rid of
this fake Asylum thing so that's what
you would say if you came there to tell
people how you're going to fix something
but she's got a little problem because
any of those ideas if they sound good
somebody's going to say so why didn't
you do that already Joe Biden says
you're in charge of
everything so she can't really come out
and say Here's a bunch of stuff I'm
going to do the only thing she said
specifically she's going to she wants to
create a path to
citizenship which is making the problem
better or worse
worse the only concrete suggestion is
something that whether you're on the
left or the right you'd say well that's
creating an incentive to come here
that's that's
worse that's not better that's
worse but here's the here's the part
that once you hear it if you listen to
it again listen for this she only talked
about
herself the only time she talked about
somebody else she talked about the poor
migrants the
non-citizens what she didn't talk about
is the the pain and destruction so much
that's coming on the American citizens
so here's her talking about the Border I
was a prosecutor okay we're not hiring
you to be a prosecutor I have toured the
tunnels okay I mean we all know there
tunnels does that make you a little
extra qualified because you've been in
one you wouldn't believe
how smooth the walls are of the tunnels
under the
Border okay well you know maybe it could
be true that Trump is not aware how
smooth the walls are on the tunnels
under the Border that's not much of a
selling point for you well Trump doesn't
even know how smooth the walls are it's
not like he's in favor of the the
tunnels so she had she just went on
forever the entire time I listened I
didn't hear it all
but the entire time I did listen she
only talked about herself and none of it
was relevant your prosecutor got it so
because you're a
prosecutor and your your entity
prosecuted some people in this context
what do you know that I don't know do do
I not know that fenel is coming across
the border and probably killed my
stepson everybody knows that do you not
know the cartels are in charge at the
border do you not know that millions of
people will come what is it we don't
know that we're now educated because we
know you were once a prosecutor and that
the walls of the tunnels were
shiny you got nothing you got nothing
lady meanwhile the border patrol said
yet another lie as with all things
border related she she was nowhere to be
found when we needed her she ignored the
Border problems until she that she
created over three years and admitted
that the uh and separately admitted that
the immigration system under her and
Biden was
broken so she said she was going to fix
the problem but isn't that really
admitting that she's the source of the
problem too because it didn't happen
under Trump he had it
fixed well the amuse account on
X says that comml Harris did some
election interference by creating some
campaign ads in which they had two
people saying that they used to be Trump
supporters but now they were in
Pennsylvania and now they're not well it
turns out that was fake they were not
real voters well they might vote but
there were actors who have always been
lifelong Democrats so they got two
lifelong Democrat actors to pretend that
they switched here's my question for you
how hard would it be for Trump to find
some prominent Democrats who switched to
him well not too hard RFK Jr Elon Musk
Scott Adams
Sachs there's pretty Amman there's
pretty long list doy you know there's a
long list he wouldn't have he wouldn't
have to hire an
actor Trump would not have to hire an
actor to say I used to be Democrat but
now I can't I can't just can't do it
anymore but she had to hire actors they
couldn't find any real
people I should tell you
something all right so here's my summary
for today I mean I'm not ending but this
this will capture my thoughts um I think
it's kind of stunning the degree to
which Democrats have legalized crime
while turning the Department of Justice
who should be fighting the crime into
the
criminals in other words lawfare Etc so
let me let me just give you some
examples so here's examples of of uh
Democrats who are basically legalizing
crime now that's a little hyperbole when
I say legalizing crime but I'll give you
the examples and you'll you'll see why
the hyperbole FS uh they wanted to
defund the police they wanted to stop uh
and they stop arresting shoplifters up
to a certain dollar Mount which caused
you know stores to close and massive
crime they're letting the homeless
control the sidewalks with everything
that brings with it they're creating an
asylum path for migrants who are willing
to lie the migrant process is is a legal
process but not if you lie if you lie
and say that you're coming for Asylum
but you're really not coming for Asylum
they have legalized that crime they've
essentially made it legal to lie that
you're here for Asylum because nobody's
going to get punished for it and it's
the obvious way to go if you're coming
in they created The Sanctuary cities to
thwart any legal processes about the uh
the immigrants uh lie about the amount
of uh crime incoming so they lied about
how much crime is coming across the
border they allowed teams of Assassins
and terrorists into the country um they
are pushing Dei which is literally
legalized discrimination against white
people white
males that's illegal um they censor
Americans via proxy
this is the Mike Ben's stuff um where we
know that the state department and the
Democrats get European and other
entities Brazilian to do the things that
they couldn't legally do to Citizens so
they just use external entities to put
the pressure on you know X and other
platforms Etc um so there're censoring
that's you know they want to take your
guns away of course there's a the
rhetoric in bages and assassinations in
my
opinion they've got elections that can't
be fully audited which supports criminal
acts during the elections and in
Manhattan apparently 60% of felonies are
reduced to misdemeanors so that's Alvin
brag
60% of
felonies are reduced to misdemeanors now
some are always I mean it's that's not
the first time that's ever happened but
60% feels like a lot to me
um and the Lesser charges are just
released all right so that's a case of
the
Democrats making effectively legal not
technically legal in every case but
effectively legalizing crime across a
whole broad range of important topics
what did that do it made the entire
country unsafe and inner cities extra
extra unsafe but at the same time that
they were making criminals
legal they were making the people whose
job it is to fight crime they turned
them into
criminals so they turn the criminals
into legal things like oh yeah you could
just just say Asylum and you could come
in ah you could take up to
$950 still technically illegal but we're
not going to do much about it right so
they legalized crime across a whole
broad array of categories and then they
took the people who were supposed to
fight that crime and they literally
turned them into to criminals because
the lawfare against Trump in my opinion
is purely criminal um the
j6 um you know the the degree to which
they were overcharged in my opinion is
just purely criminal and they've
canceled a lot of people for supporting
Trump in the media and supporters and
they've gone after his supporters are
trying to take him down and if you put
all this
together it looks like a plan to destroy
America
it looks
intentional now I usually avoid any kind
of uh conspiracy theory that deep I try
to because when you just look at a bunch
of patterns it's easy to convince
yourself that the patterns mean more
than they do but holy hell that's a lot
of
pattern let me give you
um yeah and apparently ice has known
which means the administration is known
they LED in 663 th000 people with
criminal histories 13,000 were charged
with were convicted of homicide
convicted and they led him into the
countryes 16,000 for sexual assaults and
1845 facing homicide
charges now um speaking of Shuan Ryan in
his podcast uh I'm going to ask you for
a favor uh I watched a clip in which he
had an author on just recently John Ryan
did and I didn't catch the author's name
or the name of his book so if you if you
saw it and you probably did or maybe you
could Google it for me could you put in
the comments the name of the author once
I tell you what the topic was you'll
recognize it uh suddenly he gets his due
credit because the author was very very
convincing and here's a story that I
heard from the author on Sean Ryan's
podcast um and I'm interested if you've
ever heard of this before so
Obama wanted
Dei and how it happened that it was
everywhere in the country was somewhat
clever and I'd never heard this before
so you got a president who wants you
know Dei to be a big thing and he worked
with John
Brennan and also with the various
government entities and the idea was if
you could get the government to push Dei
and to really embrace it and also hire a
lot of people for those agencies that
are under the Dei umbrella that further
will make Dei a big thing but here's the
part I didn't realize before that if you
make the government entities and
agencies all Dei um Advocates they're
going to force companies to be Dei
because those companies need approvals
and need you know need to work
productively with entities within the
government so all you have to do is get
the government to push Dei and then the
government will push you know each of
the agencies and you know people who who
have some control over individuals and
companies can then push it themselves
and apparently John Brenan has said it's
one of his greatest accomplishments or
the greatest accomplishment of his
career was bringing Dei to the CIA when
he was in charge of it and I believe
that over 50% of the CIA now is women
and that was part of his accomplishments
he says
so when I look at
Dei which is literally
illegal that is tearing the country
apart and has created a system which
guarantees incompetence not because of
the
individuals not because of anybody's
genes or culture or chromosomes or DNA
or anything like that that's a separate
that's not in the conversation it's just
that the pool of applicants to fulfill
Dei is smallish and if you if you have
to do it you're going to just hire less
qualified people and what we should see
under a
Dei
environment within one decade you should
see every major institution
crumble that would be the prediction
that you could you could predict on
paper and again not because of anybody's
DNA not because of anybody's race or
culture
nothing to do with that it's just that
if you force a constraint on a thing
that's barely working in the first place
which is you know the economy the the
economy is always you know
delicately between you know working
great and failing there's always that
small difference between huge economic
success and well that didn't work and
Dei is by far enough to move you from
the great economic success to everything
fell apart and we're not sure why just
everything we tried to do didn't work
you made a phone call to text support
they couldn't help you you know
basically nothing works so we are in
that phase we are we are in the
predictable stage of everything
up because we have too many incompetent
people in every
organization and it was
intentional now if you ask them they'd
say we're trying to make you know the
organizations look like America make
sure everybody has opportunity I like
all of that you know on paper I like it
all it's just if the only way you can
implement it is a bunch of managers
saying I'm going to get fired unless I
hire somebody who's a Dei person and
even if I can't find a good one I'm GNA
have to take a chance until everything
falls apart and that's where we are
everything's falling apart and honestly
it's mostly Dei problem more than
anything it's Dei now on top of that
everything's more complicated every year
so in theory that an average person who
could do you know a reasonable job at
something no longer can so the
complexity of everything makes it so if
you're not in the top 20% of capability
you're not going to be able to do
anything everything's just too hard you
know back back when you know you just
had to milk a cow oh almost everybody
could do it all you had to do is shoot
an animal and skin it well most people
could do it with a little bit of
practice but most people can't do most
jobs now they're just too
complicated anyway Frank luns says that
uh the uh for the first time in a long
time there are more people uh registered
as Republicans than Democrats in the
entire
country did you see that
coming I did not see that
coming I I have to admit that one snuck
up on me because you know what what it
is about Republicans that really stands
out and and I've always loved this about
conservatives and
Republicans they're really about just
getting the work
done they're not so much about making
sure that everybody knows
it so there's something about this
number that says to me that
Republicans just got to work and said we
can't give up the country if there are
more Democrats than there are
Republicans we're all
dead and so since the obvious solution
to having more Democrats than
Republicans is you register more
Republicans they did now again Scott
presler gets you know a huge bit of
credit for what he did especially in
Pennsylvania but there must be a lot
more people working on this I I don't
know is this the Lara Trump
um part of the world I'm not sure if
what she's doing is directly or
indirectly related to this now some of
this might be that the Democrats did
such a bad job that people are hiding as
Independents because I think that
happens if if if Biden is just
embarrassing people will say um I'm uh
uh let's say I'm an
independent yeah not my fault sure I
voted for him but now I'm independent
now I'm independent
so some of it is fake people just hiding
because they don't want to take the heat
but it's never been this way before and
it's not even that close there's 48%
Republican and 45% Democrat now there's
still so
many um wait a minute this can't be
right how's that no that's not right
these numbers can't be right because
that would mean that The Independents
are no this can't be right I thought
Independents were about a third of
Voters am I wrong about
that the last time I saw these numbers
The Independents Democrats and
Republicans were roughly about the same
number and this would this would suggest
that there are very few Independents so
that can't be right all right I'm going
to uh I'm going to Pivot my Pivot is
there's something wrong with these
numbers it could be that they're only
comparing people who who are registered
one way or the
other which you know I would need more
detail to know if that's what's
happening but let's say that uh let's
say the numbers are
true what would that suggest would be
the likely um
vote if there really are more
Republicans registered than Democrats
who would win the not the electoral vote
but the overall National vote should be
the one who's got the most people
registered because that's what it's been
before you know whe there were more
Democrats and sure enough they won the
national vote even when they lost the uh
you know the Electoral College so what
would be the result hypothetically if
these numbers held and let's say let's
say um Independence we don't know this
but let's say independence match to this
these
ratios I think Independence are going to
be far more for Trump but let's say it's
just this
much that would suggest a
landslide right if Trump wins the
popular vote
Nationwide the electoral vote is a
landslide now I need somebody smart to
tell me I'm wrong about that but I think
I'm right
so you've got the you've got the
national
polls which uh depending on how they
wait things and how they ask the
question and you know some assumptions
that they make when they collect their
data they look a little sketchy don't
they now the national polls sometimes
say Comm ahead sometimes by a lot
sometimes they say Trump's ahead
sometimes by a good amount so the
national polls appear to be completely
funky and unreliable at this
moment but do you think that we can
accurately count how many people have
registered as Republicans versus
Democrats yes because that doesn't
require an assumption and it doesn't
require any there there's not much room
for weasel it's probably just a data
that you're either registered or you're
not so if you're going to believe one
what would be more believable that the
Republican registrations have surged
which would indicate a landslide for
Trump or that the uh individual polls
which we've never trusted in the past
and always seem to get mysteriously
accurate right toward the
election sort of in
October do you do you know what the
October surprise is yet one of them
there's probably going to be lots of
them have you figured out the October
surprise well
if this is true the Republican um
registrations have now outnumbered
Democrat
registrations this election is over in
terms of voting is you know I'm going to
agree with Eric
Weinstein that we don't know if Trump
will become president because the the
Bad
actors looks like there's no limits to
what they'd be willing to do and I mean
actually no limits so I think Trump
probably has a dominant position and it
looks like a landslide if nothing
changes but remember going to be lots of
changes so here's what I think will be
your October surprise now can't
guarantee it can't guarantee it but the
pollsters are all going to be showing a
Landslide by election day because if
they don't if they
don't then next election you're going to
say um there was a landslide and you
weren't even close why should we listen
to you again why should we pay you for
your for your stuff why should we ever
report what you said again so it becomes
really important for the pollsters to
end up in the top five top
10 so if they're way off a few weeks
before election which is what
October the October
surprise is going to be the
polls now you knew it was going to
happen but here's the surprise it's
going to be bigger than you
thought I think the surprise is going to
be the the degree of poller shenanigans
that are happening in September are
beyond what you imagined was
possible that's that's what I think will
be your surprise now I could be wrong
right it'd be easy to be wrong about
this
but when you see the if you see the
people on the streets um I just saw
another person on the street thing
they're asking just young people who
they
supported it seems to be Trump every
time somebody goes on the
street and even if maybe it was always
you know close to half and half the
Trump supporters who are young will say
it out loud with no embarrassment
whatsoever as if it's the cooler thing
to do
now and once you see how many 20-some
people are are you know just yelling
Trump into the the camera so happy to
support him perfectly happy that that
they're seen by their their other fellow
students seen by whoever is going to see
the video there's nothing holding it
back Trump and I
think I think it's because eating the
dogs I think eating the dogs eating the
cats is what made him popular with young
people well plus you know the
assassination attempt was you know
remarkable you know the the fight fight
fight part but the the cats and the dogs
thing is still trending on Tik Tok and
when you see people's reaction to him
and you see the number of people who are
still dancing to that something's
happening something Big's
happening all right of course you know
the big news is Israel took out the head
of Hezbollah with a gigantic set of
bombs bunker Busters I guess yes so
here's what
happened see how impressed you are by
this so uh Hezbollah has like reportedly
I don't know 100,000 rockets that could
be fired at Israel if they were to fire
them all at the same
time or in big waves then the Iron Dome
would have a tough time getting them all
just because of
numbers so really the threat that hezel
had was that will fire them in big waves
at the same time it wasn't really a risk
if they did you know one here or there
the Iron Dome could get them and chances
are it was wasn't going to hit anything
anyway so what do you think it
takes for hzb to fire all of their stuff
at the same time well coordination
obviously coordination and what does
that take well some kind of
communication and what does that take
well you're going to have to use some
kind of
digital
communication and apparently because
they thought the cell phones could be
too easily tracked by Israel they had
moved to pagers and
walkie-talkies which as you know Israel
found a way to make explody so once all
their pagers and walkie-talkies
exploded what's next well the first
thing that you might not realize
is that they may have lost their ability
to coordinate an attack CU if they don't
do it all at the same time they're just
wasting their
missiles send up three missiles Israel
knocks down three
missiles and you're done so if you can't
shoot them all at the same time you've
lost your only weapon the you know the
one that anybody's worried about so I
can't say for sure that they lost that
ability but they haven't launched a big
wave of
missiles and they did lose all of their
leadership and the last guy that was
left said to himself huh I'm going to
have to figure out how to rebuild and
get things coordinated again but I
better not use any digital means so send
out the runners and get the the I don't
know the third level down of commanders
because the other ones have all been
killed and we'll we'll meet in my uh my
command bunker
yeah we're whatever's left of the
leadership of Hezbollah after most of
it's already been killed we're going to
meet in my well-known command
bunker my well-known well-identified
command
bunker knowing that there are obviously
spies working because without the spies
Israel would not have been able to kill
all of the top guys Commander
already wherever they were they got them
all which very heavily suggests there's
an Insider who's saying um he's in a
blue car he's heading down the street
now so the head of Hezbollah clearly not
a strategic genius decided to get what
was left of Hezbollah to meet him in
person in his command
bunker well what do you think happened
then
I'm not supposed to laugh at
War but did this really
happen did Israel really figure out a
way to kill all the leaders and then
make sure that the new team of leaders
all went in the same place at the same
time and that they would know where they
were and when they were there and then
they would drop a bunch of Bunker
Busters on it and just make it a
hole in the
ground well there's nothing funny about
this
situation but Hezbollah had been telling
a lot of lies and Israel decided to
debunker
him that's right they debunker
him uh and when they were
done uh the thing that used to be called
a command bunker uh looked a lot like
Justin Bieber's sphincter after a diddy
party
I I'll just let you live with that one
for a
while take your time take your time
whenever you're done we'll get back to
it okay yeah look like Justin Bieber's
spincter spincter after a diddy party
anyway uh we don't see them uh firing
back a whole bunch of missiles uh Iran
apparently had a big old meeting and
Iran thinks some people are saying Iran
is going to send some
um somebody said Iran might send some
troops to Lebanon I don't know if that's
a good idea for them but
uh it gets better apparently Israel
hacked the airport control tower for uh
for Lebanon Beirut I guess and uh since
we know that Iran apparently was
shipping in supplies and weapons to
Hezbollah uh they got to the control
tower took it over with hackers and told
the planes they better turn around
because they're in trouble if they land
and and there's some evidence that one
of the planes that was coming from Iran
to Lebanon turned around immediately
turned around
immediately which means it was probably
full of weapons don't know for sure but
maybe well if any of this is
true uh
Israel basically just rewrote all the
war books about how you do anything
the the level of
Brilliance that appears to be here now
remember this is still fog of War
propaganda you know we're we're getting
a version of the news that says Israel
is beyond brilliant so just just be
careful that you're maybe not seeing all
the warts you know maybe things weren't
as clean and maybe there was some luck
involved and so we don't know everything
but if we were just to judge it on the
surface it would be the greatest
military strategic
success of my life I mean the the amount
that I am
impressed by what Israel's done
militarily and again I want to if
somebody is new to me I don't back uh
Israel because they don't back me it's
not my job to back Israel now they're an
ally and I take that seriously but I'm
an American so I'm sitting over are
carrying what's good for
me you know Israel is just something I'm
observing and sometimes I say to myself
all right if that happened to America
how would we act well we're full of Dei
so we couldn't get we couldn't pull that
off but I wish we could I wish we were
that
smart anyway um there's a uh there's a
new drone South Korea made a
drone that works on hydrogen
it's a hydrogen drone Tech times says so
this is it's got a 5,800 mile range and
can stay in the air for hours compared
to 30 minutes for a normal drone so if
you've got something that can lift um
some weight and can go 5,800 miles and
stay in the air for
hours the degree of warfare you can do
with small drones because these would be
smallish
ones is a whole new level
so um I don't know how close we are to
an all robot war where it's just drones
in the sky because you don't want to
waste a pilot
and um you know robot dogs on the ground
we're pretty close we're pretty close we
might actually get to the point where if
the robots on one side defeat the robots
on the other that the humans will Just
Surrender rather than send humans to
fight their robots which would just be
Slaughter we'll just say all right you
robots beat our robots we don't like it
but you're in charge now you own our
country we're getting there I think
you'll see it in your
lifetime um judge chuckin according to
Jeff Clark she she's uh gaming with the
uh the timing of things so that few
weeks before the election there would be
some kind of reveal from Jack Smith so
Jack Smith the da he's got some
materials that are we haven't seen But
the redacted version might come out mid
October now
whatever a prosecutor of trump produces
in mid October is going to be bad for
Trump now do you think it's a huge
coincidence that the Badness would come
out at the very worst time do we expect
that whatever Badness he produces is
real like actually in context and
accurate nope I do not believe that I
believe that they would because remember
Department of Justice are criminals and
the criminals are now legal so this
would be the Department of Justice now
they're criminals um so the criminal
thing to do would be to make up a bunch
of and know that there's no time to
correct it before the election and and
just depend on the uh the fake news to
say it's all true and then after the
election you do the fact check it's like
oh oh yeah I guess I guess this wasn't
as true as we thought sorry about that
yeah yeah sorry that's what it looks
like well one of my favorite things
yesterday was that Trump and zinski met
now that's unusual because Trump is not
the sitting president so that you you
have to be delicate about what you can
and cannot do in that situation but I
loved the press conference after where
Trump his 6'3 is standing over zinski is
56 or whatever he is and zalinski just
looked like he' just been punished by
his parents like he looked like a
defeated he didn't look like zalinsky of
old give us weapons we'll fight every
day we win and and Trump is just
saying what was Trump saying he was
saying uh basically it's over we need to
negotiate a deal you know we'll just
figure out who gets what land we'll sort
it out now that's when
zalinski in the past would have said
something like no we will fight we must
get every inch of land back we will
never quit they can't steal our land the
best he could do because he knows
there's a good chance he's going to be
dealing with Trump in the future the
best he could do is remind us that
Russia is on Ukrainian land and so when
they negotiate you know that should be
top of
mind but even he was talking about
negotiating
now correct me if I'm wrong so now
zalinsky seems on board with negotiating
and obviously some kind of land
agreement will have to happen Putin of
course is interested in negotiating and
they're the two sides who's not
interested in
negotiating Democrats and the Deep State
and the military-industrial complex but
if you put Trump in there there's nobody
left who wants the war zalinsky doesn't
really want any more of it you know he
love to win but doesn't seem to be an
option so forget about that yeah all it
takes is a president Trump now when he'd
been saying he could get it done in a
day you know that's hyperbole nobody
could do it in a
day but basically he could because all
it takes is Trump to be president and
then there's nobody in the game who
wants to keep fighting because Ukraine
and Russia definitely don't they
definitely don't and as long as Trump
doesn't there's nobody left so yes he
could wind it up soon as he gets in
there I I wonder if Trump actually
worried that he could end the war before
he got in office and before there's even
an election so that it wouldn't count in
his benefit on the
election but if you want to end this war
you now have a
100% obvious way to do it that you
control as a citizen you can just vote
for Trump and this war is
over it really is all right Bill Maher
had a show last night we always talk
about him he is you know I know it
bothers some people that bill Mah is
always at discussion the next day
because blah blah blah um but he is a a
good indicator of what people are
thinking and on that basis it's
fascinating
and uh he actually said that uh we
should defend
Ukraine um and that it's basically so
little money for the United States that
we're you getting some benefit of
degrading Russia we're protecting our
Ally kind of an ally um and and this is
what Mars says about the
money uh he says that basically none of
us know that none of us can tell the
difference the amount of money we spent
in Ukraine he's saying that you you and
I don't feel
it to which I say have you heard of
inflation now I don't know how much of
the um let's see if our if our deficit
per year is in the over a trillion
dollar range is it like 1.3 trillion
somewhere in that range and how much do
we give to um Ukraine every year
a few hundred billion do we spend a few
hundred billion per year so maybe
15% of our deficit something like that
and then of course we have to build up
our own military because you know we're
we're spending sending our bullets over
there so we got to buy our own bullets
or something so um he is correct that we
cannot identify the difference in our
life from the Ukraine expenses I can't
identify
okay how much of my inflation was
because that war might be
10% but it's also not ending and the
amount we're spending isn't really the
total issue it's about whether we should
be having a war with a nuclear power and
what are we getting from it and is it
worth 200 billion and if we've got 200
billion extra to spend on anything is
that where you want it to go because 200
billion is real
money um anyway so far the it's been 10
billion here 7 billion in there I don't
know what it adds up
to and
um all right V ramaswami says that uh
musk is super hardcore about firing
federal employees working with Trump and
I saw this on the George account good
account to follow on X George H he's Ras
Swami said it looks like Elon will use
OIC on the government's fat and here's a
quote elon's pretty hardcore and V says
I said 75% of the federal bureaucrats he
said you need to put at least
75 so Elon musk's correction to V who
wanted to get rid of 75% of the
bureaucrats was you should say at
least how much do you love that how much
do you love that that if you could
imagine that you could ever get rid of
75% of the de the bureaucrats
um that you should really be saying
more I I just love that I don't know
that they can get rid of more than
75% but the fact that he's not going to
be limited by your 75% estimate I love
that it's at least
75%
anyway um according to the Gateway
pundit Antonio Gro writer
he's got an argument in there opinion
piece that liberal policies are driving
up our obesity rates now up to 40% of
the adults or is it everybody uh
40% are obese I don't know if that's 40%
of oh yeah it is adults and 20% of
children now when I saw that opinion I
said to myself I don't know if I want to
read this because I don't think he's
going to convince me that liberal
policies are making people fat
because I said to
myself how how how are liberal policies
making anybody fat explain that and he
talked about how school gym classes are
cutting way back so kids are less active
in school and I said H Public Schools
okay Democrats pretty much have a lock
on everything that happens in the public
school so yeah I guess okay yeah less
physical activity sure uh then there's
fat acceptance
the idea that Democrats are pushing the
idea that you don't need to lose weight
you're perfectly healthy nobody should
judge you and while I agree with the
notion that I don't like fat
shaming there's no question
that the public attitude toward toward
it has an impact on how people act right
if people say you're fine you can be any
weight you want there's going to be more
people overweight if if the public says
cruy cruy don't be like that there's
probably going to be less of it people
are going to try harder now there might
also be some uh food related uh
illnesses but that's a separate question
I'm talking about anorexia for
example um there are food deserts now in
a lot of poor areas because uh the crime
was so high that uh places that would
sell you healthier food like a grocery
store just said oh we're out here's
there's still McDonald's so good
luck that feels fair and then of course
the pandemic and the lockdown had some
lasting effects so I'm not sure uh you
know how much of the Obesity is because
of liberal policies but I do think that
Antonio made his case he made his case
it it's just we can't tell what
percentage of the whole problem is
caused by that but it's not making it
better anyway there's now jets that are
going to be able to do automatic
takeoffs and landings according to
CNN um
and if he didn't know this and this is
weird uh the more advanced planes could
already land in bad weather and stuff um
on instruments well it could it could
land autonomously so even if the pilot
dropped dead the advanced planes could
just land and and the landing some say
they the machine would do it better than
the pilot pilot can make a human error
the machines much less likely but what I
didn't know is that the um the planes
were not equipped to take off with an a
pilot which seems weird it seems like
taking off would be easier than Landing
but taking off is actually harder I mean
where it can
be so it's actually a big deal that
airplanes are learning to take off on
their own at the same time that uh Robo
taxis are coming on so the idea of
having a human sitting behind a steering
wheel for anything it will be largely
defunct except for recreational stuff
like I don't know maybe your fishing
boat or
something
anyway and that ladies and
gentlemen is all I wanted to say that's
worth saying
today uh we'll keep an eye on whatever
is happening with Hezbollah and Israel
but uh as I've said before if Israel's
going to get tough with its its enemies
and neighbors there's never been a
better time in history to do it because
first of all it seems like they have you
know good handle on the the military
strategy obviously but also there's no
leadership in the United States so if
they can get themselves a little bit
pregnant you know make sure that they're
well into a war against Hezbollah or ran
or whoever they decide to go to war with
um if they do it now Trump won't be B to
stop him because he's not president and
Biden's barely a president and Harris is
out in the road so if you were going to
make a big
move um and you're Israel it's going to
happen now so I would expect maximum
chaos um but there's also a
possibility that Israel will have a
surprisingly fast and good result in
Lebanon because a lot of the Lebanese
I'm hearing are not so pro- esbah so if
Israel could find a way to be um let's
say accurate enough to take out
Hezbollah without killing much in the
way of innocent Lebanese people who
don't like Les hezb either they might be
able to find a workable situation there
maybe imagine how different that would
be if Lebanon were no longer an enemy of
Israel or at least parts of
it so Hezbollah being Bad actors and
Hamas Being Bad actors maybe something
can change we'll see all right ladies
and gentlemen that's all I have for you
I'm going to talk to the local
subscribers privately because of their
awesomeness but uh I'll see the rest of
you on YouTube and Rumble and X tomorrow
same time same place bye for now we've
got 30 seconds to
sip
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e e