Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive July 1, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2611

Episode 2611 CWSA 09/28/24

Episode #2611 Sep 28, 2024 1:27:55 32,076 views

Harris at border, Hezbollah in a hole, and election stuff ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Oh my God, I've got this little itch right in the back of my shoulders where I can't reach. This is why you need the telescoping back scratcher. You should have one everywhere because there's this one little area back there I can't reach. Oh my God. Oh, oh my God. Oh, so good. All right. Well, if y…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

rica. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the greatest experience of your life. If you'd like to take this up to levels that nobody can really understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or mug or glass or tankard or shell, a canteen,…

View segment →
NewsReaction Health & Biohacking

the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go. The best. I wonder if the coffee is making me healthier. Well, there's a new study discussed in Brink Zone that coffee increases your testosterone and your anaerobic power. That's right. A little bit o…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

t anyway, but trust me, I could have if I tried a little harder. Well, here's the kind of stories I see every day lately. So the Michigan mail-in ballots are now only going to be counted if there's proof of signature. This is Gateway Pundit reporting this, to which I said to myself, wait a minute,…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

a given that Trump was the worst person in the world and would say any crazy thing. Now, since the fine people hoax is not true, then suddenly all the other hoaxes, once you learn it's not true and how they did it and how blatantly it was done... I think the thing about the fine people hoax is that…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

issiles and there's a bunch of assassin teams coming through the border. And there are tens of thousands of Chinese military-looking people coming through the border. We let everybody in. It's the biggest failure in American politics. Yeah, let me say that with a little bit of confidence. In the hi…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

coming in. And at the same time Harris has called for a pathway to citizenship for millions of the migrants she led into the country. I don't know how you could be worse to create the biggest blunder in American history and then to top it by saying let's give them citizenship so they can also vote.…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

e of the Democrats making, effectively, legal, not technically legal in every case but effectively legalizing crime across a whole broad range of important topics. What did that do? It made the entire country unsafe and inner cities extra, extra unsafe. But at the same time that they were making cri…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

h these numbers. It could be that they're only comparing people who are registered one way or the other which you know I would need more detail to know if that's what's happening. But let's say that the numbers are true. What would that suggest would be the likely vote? If there really are more Repu…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

t them all. Which very heavily suggests there's an insider who's saying he's in a blue car, he's heading down the street now. So the head of Hezbollah, clearly not a strategic genius, decided to get what was left of Hezbollah to meet him in person in his command bunker. Well what do you think happe…

View segment →
MainContent AI & Technology

I don't know how much of the deficit per year is in the over a trillion dollar range. Is it like 1.3 trillion somewhere in that range? And how much do we give to Ukraine every year? A few hundred billion? Do we spend a few hundred billion per year? So maybe 15% of our deficit something like that. An…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

em is caused by that but it's not making it better anyway. There's now jets that are going to be able to do automatic takeoffs and landings according to CNN. And if you didn't know this and this is weird, the more advanced planes could already land in bad weather and stuff on instruments. Well it c…

View segment →

Oh my God, I've got this little itch right in the back of my shoulders where I can't reach. This is why you need the telescoping back scratcher. You should have one everywhere because there's this one little area back there I can't reach. Oh my God. Oh, oh my God. Oh, so good.

All right. Well, if you didn't notice, the Dilbert comic is up. It's the reborn comic now. Normally the Dilbert comic and the Dilbert Reborn comic don't do any politics. So this isn't really politics. It's just Dogbert picking up on a meme, but I thought you'd like it. Let me read it to you in case you're listening.

Dogbert says to Dilbert, they're just sitting around the breakfast table, and Dilbert says, "I'm sorry." Dogbert says, "When the hunter's bullet grazed my ear, I dropped to the ground out of instinct. Then I jumped up and looked at the pack of wolves I had come to lead and yelled, 'Fight! Fight! Fight!'" And he's raising his fist like Trump did. "Your story..." And then Dilbert says, "Your story is inspiring but derivative." And Dogbert says, "I didn't want to reinvent the wheel. I mean, stick with what works, right? People stick with what works."

Anyway, that's available only on Locals. You have to subscribe to see Dilbert Reborn either on the Locals platform, ScottAdams.locals.com, or you can see it on the X platform if you subscribe.

Oh, by the way, the 2025 Dilbert calendar is available for presale. The desk page-a-day desk calendar made in America for the first time. And if you go to Dilbert.com, you'll see the link for the presale. It's the only place you can get it. It's not going to be on Amazon, not now or ever, and it won't be in bookstores. Only one link. It's the only way you can get it. Made in America.

Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the greatest experience of your life. If you'd like to take this up to levels that nobody can really understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or mug or glass or tankard or shell, a canteen, jug or flask or vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine, the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go.

The best. I wonder if the coffee is making me healthier. Well, there's a new study discussed in Brink Zone that coffee increases your testosterone and your anaerobic power. That's right. A little bit of coffee and you'll be stronger and have more testosterone. You want me to prove it? Watch this. All right, this is really good fabric on this t-shirt and I didn't want to hurt it anyway, but trust me, I could have if I tried a little harder.

Well, here's the kind of stories I see every day lately. So the Michigan mail-in ballots are now only going to be counted if there's proof of signature. This is Gateway Pundit reporting this, to which I said to myself, wait a minute, are you telling me that in the past the Michigan mail-in ballots didn't need any signature verification? The most basic thing you would do? No. And wait a minute, are you telling me that they're only just barely fixing this in time for the election? That's right. Just a few weeks before the actual election.

But thank goodness, thank goodness there's no other irregularity to report about the election. Well, Jim Jordan has accused the Department of Homeland Security secretary of stonewalling the Ohio election integrity, according to Raw Story. So Jim Jordan says the Homeland Security is refusing to respond to requests from Ohio's top election official for federal citizenship verification records. I guess they want to make sure that the people who are voting are citizens, but the Department of Homeland Security is stonewalling them.

Do you know how many stories I see every day, almost all of them on X, about something that is clearly broken in our election system and somebody's trying to fix it? Now, sometimes successfully, sometimes they get stonewalled. But if we have a pristine election system that we're quite all sure has been perfect, why are so many things getting fixed? Are the people we elect in various states so dumb that they don't know the elections are perfect the way they are and they think they're fixing something that ain't broke? Or is it stuff that's really obviously broken and was obviously broken before, and yet the news that you thought was real told you, "Well, we know those elections were good"?

Yeah, you can know what you don't know. That's what the news told you. Here's a list of things that can't be known that we know. But wait, that can't be known. Yeah, but we know it, right? But there isn't any way to know it, but we know it. Well, how do you know it? Well, we didn't look into it. No, not looking into it is not how you know things. Well, there were no complaints that we saw. But you just said you didn't look into it. That's right. So if you don't look into it, you can be sure what happened exactly.

And that's actually what the news has been telling us for years, and people just sit at home going, "Uh-huh, uh-huh. Didn't look into it. Must be a good election." I can think of no better evidence of a good election than "we didn't really look into it." Oh, by the way, it's designed so you can't fully audit it. Yeah, just normal stuff. Nothing to be concerned about.

How many Democrats will hear either of those stories today? How many Democrats are going to hear about Michigan not checking signatures in the past? Oh my God. Or that we're not entirely sure who are citizens and should be able to vote. Do you think any Democrats will hear that? No, no. It'll be basically zero.

Let's see what the public thinks about election integrity. Well, it used to be that Republicans were confident in the system and Democrats thought it might be a little sketchy. But according to Gallup, that is somewhat reversed, and now the Republicans think the elections are more sketchy than the Democrats. But both sides think they're a little bit sketchy. So 57% of those polled by Gallup said that they will be only somewhat confident in the accuracy of the election, where 24% say they're not too confident and a whopping 19% say they're not confident at all.

I would have added those two together, but only 57% of the public thinks they're very or even somewhat confident in the results. Does that sound about right to you? Does that sound like a system that's been designed to make us confident that we know what happened? No. I don't think you can get to only 57% think the election is fair and reliable unless it's designed to keep you from knowing who won our elections.

Let me say it again. Our elections are very obviously, very obviously designed so you don't know who won. I think that's the only thing you need to know. If you spent a few minutes looking at the design of the system and then I said to you, all right, would you know if the post office threw away some ballots? No, you wouldn't. How would you know that? How would you catch that in an audit? There's no way to catch that. No, it's uncatchable.

If I told you that a state actor, whether it's the CIA or some other country, had worked with an insider at one of the voting machines or tabulator companies and had hacked it with the help of an insider to cover up any trail, would you be able to spot that? No, no you wouldn't. No, there's no way you could catch that. What would be the most obvious way that anybody would cheat? Well, one of those ways. How about if somebody was a non-citizen and yet they got a mail-in vote and then they voted? What part of the process checks all those names against real voters? Well, maybe some states do, but not all of them.

So the most obvious ways that anybody would think of, you know, if you were going to think of a way to cheat, none of them are checkable. The most obvious ways you would cheat. And so to imagine that you could know who won an election is sort of just naive. Yeah, but there we are.

So CNN did a fact check on Kamala Harris's claims about manufacturing jobs. So she said something about Trump being bad and losing manufacturing jobs and Biden being good and getting them back. But apparently it was just wildly incorrect, just a lie basically. But CNN fact-checked it. Now here's my question. Have you noticed the selectivity of CNN's fact-checking? How many votes do you think got changed because somebody exaggerated or had wrong data about manufacturing? None. None. No. Even if the Democrats heard that this was a fake claim and it was a lie, there's probably not even one Democrat who's going to change their vote because somebody exaggerated or said something about manufacturing jobs.

You've got two candidates who both say they want to bring manufacturing back to the US. Both of them are going to use hyperbole about their numbers. Both of them are going to choose a period of time that makes their thing look good. Both of them are going to pad things. It has no effect on the actual outcome of the vote. Now, you know it would if they fact-checked the hoaxes. If they fact-checked all the hoaxes every time she used one, that would affect the election. Because nobody thinks that an ordinary lie told by a politician is different or even noteworthy. Nobody cares. It's just part of the process.

But if you told the CNN and MSNBC viewers that their entire worldview was created by a mesh network of hoaxes that the media creates, that would change some votes. Because we've saw that a number of the people who said, "I've been a lifetime Democrat but I changed my vote," the number one thing they point out is the fine people hoax. The fine people hoax is the tentpole hoax, meaning it's the one that keeps all the other hoaxes alive. If you believed the fine people hoax, then you accepted as a given that Trump was the worst person in the world and would say any crazy thing.

Now, since the fine people hoax is not true, then suddenly all the other hoaxes, once you learn it's not true and how they did it and how blatantly it was done... I think the thing about the fine people hoax is that you didn't have to really do research to find out it was a lie and that the entire left-leaning media landscape were all in on it. They all knew the truth because they had the video too. So that one's a real... that one just makes your brain go, wait a minute, what? How badly were they lying to me? Because it's one thing when a candidate tells a lie. Like I said, you just expect that. But when the entire media landscape coordinates with the Democrats to tell you a lie like the fine people hoax, that can change your mind when you find out that you were a victim of that. And then that there are 20 more just like it. There are 20 more. The fine people hoax was just the tentpole. You still needed other polls to hold things up, but the main tentpole was that one.

And I'd like to say that I'm happy that I worked for seven years to debunk it. You know, Candace Owens, Joel Pollak, we all worked like the three of us just worked like maniacs for three years every time that popped up to make sure that people saw the counter, you know, the debunk.

Anyway, Harris goes to the border, which gives... I don't think anybody's having more fun in the last few months than Scott Jennings, who I guess would represent the Republican opinion on CNN. Now I'd like to give CNN a little bit of credit. So I think it's prudent to call balls and strikes and not just be in the bag for one team completely. So the fact that Scott Jennings is not only very effective in his communications on behalf of Republicans but he does get a lot of screen time. He gets a lot of screen time. He shows up in clips and he's doing a hell of a job. If you haven't watched any of Scott Jennings debunking the CNN people while they watch, you have to watch it. Not just for what he says, because he does a great job of framing things, but you have to watch the faces of the panelists when they're forced to listen to the truth on CNN. Because they all know they're liars. They're completely aware of what they're doing. So when they give him time and they let him talk, you just have to... I've reposted a few on X if you want to see them. You just have to see the faces while they listen. They try to do the smug smile, but the smile says, "I know you got us."

It's sort of a, you know, I'm doing an impression now. If you're hearing only audio, it's that the smug smile. It's toothless. So a real smile shows your teeth usually. Here's a real smile. See, here's a real smile. It's all teethy. Here's a smile that says Scott Jennings is making you look like you have a brain the size of a squirrel and a million people are watching him do it while your face is on the screen. Yeah, see that? That's the face when you're being dunked on by Scott Jennings on CNN. I'm happy. I'm happy but not happy enough so you can see my teeth. I'm so happy. Look at my smile. I'm not even bothered by it at all. I'm not even bothered by being called out as a ridiculous propagandist right in front of the world. Look at me smiling. It's not bothering me a bit.

So that's hilarious. I recommend it. Here's what Scott Jennings said when Harris went to the border. He said, "Arsonist returns to scene of crime." I told you he's good at reframing. Arsonist returns to scene of crime and we're done. I could continue talking about this topic of Kamala Harris visiting the border, but everything I say is just going to fit under this one reframe: arsonist returns to scene of crime.

Do I need to tell anybody that the Biden administration is 100% responsible for everything we see at the border? Or if you don't like using common words for stuff, just in control of things at the border in some general way. That never happened. Three and a half years of complete, absolute failure to the point where it looks like intentional treason. We don't know that it is, but it sure looks like it. You can't fail harder than she has failed and Biden has failed at the border. You can't fail harder than that. And she returns to the scene of the crime like an arsonist anyway.

And Scott Jennings points out there was a huge tactical mistake to just make sure that people were really paying attention to the border while Harris tells you it's a giant problem. While you say, but you caused the problem. Why are you now acting like you don't know what caused it? And why are you there? You should be hiding in shame for what you've done. And the fact that she went to the border and simply made the border issue more prominent in the news, yeah, that's what mattered. What didn't matter were her clever little arguments and stuff about it. No, nobody cares about that. All they care about is we spent more time thinking about criminals coming across the border.

Now, as luck would have it, the ICE report came out at the same time saying that the number of criminals, literally murderers and rapists, were in the tens of thousands. The ones we know about. Imagine how many people that maybe murdered somebody and got away with it and still came here. So at the same time the public is being exposed, we hope, maybe no Democrats ever saw that data, but it was national news at least on the right. And I think Scott Jennings mentioned these numbers too, so he penetrated the CNN audience with that.

So at the same time we're seeing massive, unreported until now, numbers of criminals that we have deliberately, deliberately led into the country. At the same time we're seeing reports that ISIS is sneaking people into the country. At the same time we're hearing that maybe, I don't know, Hezbollah or some other damn thing is coming in with shoulder-mounted missiles and there's a bunch of assassin teams coming through the border. And there are tens of thousands of Chinese military-looking people coming through the border. We let everybody in. It's the biggest failure in American politics.

Yeah, let me say that with a little bit of confidence. In the history of American government, opening the border the way it was done is the biggest mistake in American history. If you could come up with a better example of a bigger mistake, I don't know one. And the thing is we haven't seen the price of that yet. The price is yet to be paid because we're letting in a whole bunch of terrorists at the same time Iran is going to go to war with Israel. Maybe we'll talk about that. And what would Iran do? What have we been warned by the people who know how things work in this world? What is Iran going to do if, let's say, Iran itself is attacked as opposed to its proxies? They're going to attack inside the United States. Your lights are going to go off because Iran is not a "me too" follower kind of a country. They have abilities. They got skills and they're probably already in our cyber. They probably have already penetrated some of our systems. They almost certainly have agents with weapons in the United States. Not that they're necessarily going to do an October 7th attack, but they could certainly do things that we weren't sure if it was them or somebody else.

So it is, in my opinion, the biggest blunder in all of American government history. I don't think there's a second place to that. And I guess what's different about it is that it was obvious it was a blunder before they did it. I mean, it looks so much like somebody was trying to destroy the country. It doesn't even look like this was ever a serious thing that somebody thought was a good idea. It simply looks like somebody had a plan to destroy the country. I'll talk more about that.

Speaking of which, Harris looked at the Trump border wall. So she had to stand in front of the border wall that Trump built, which at one point in 2019 she'd called that medieval vanity project. And now she's all about building some more. How do the Democrats not notice what's going on? But they don't. They don't seem to notice anyway.

Former Navy SEAL Shawn Ryan, who's got a podcast, he was on Joe Rogan and he said the Taliban is funneling terrorists into the US through the southern border for some kind of October 7th style attack. Now I don't think Iran would want to do an October 7th in the United States, but ISIS might. ISIS might. So that's all coming in. And at the same time Harris has called for a pathway to citizenship for millions of the migrants she led into the country. I don't know how you could be worse to create the biggest blunder in American history and then to top it by saying let's give them citizenship so they can also vote. The level of incompetence is way beyond anything I could call accidental. It doesn't look accidental. Nobody could be this dumb. I mean, nobody could really.

So she gives a speech after she went to the border. And I would like to say as far as I could tell when she gave her speech she was not inebriated. And I thought she did a great job. So it was a teleprompter speech. At first I thought maybe it was impromptu and I was more impressed, but then when I looked, oh it's teleprompter. But the teleprompter she does really well now. So I guess she's been doing a lot of practice on the campaign trail. But man, she read that teleprompter. She did not cackle. She had all the right motions and everything. But I did note a few problems.

Oh, number one, if you'd like to know when she's inebriated and when she's not, there's a tell that is guaranteed. Right now I think you can tell by just the way she talks and everything, but there's one tell for whether she's inebriated. And she definitely wasn't. She was in full control and did a good job in her speech. Here's her hand gestures when she's not inebriated. They're crisp and they're smallish. So she'd be like, dupe, dupe, crisp, tight, controlled. So when she's talking, her hands are very much part of a good presenter's hands.

Now I'm going to give you the impression of when she's inebriated. Shoulders moving and hands are not tight. They're all over the place. Let me tell you what we're going to do. You watch for it. Tight hands. Tight versus loose hands. If you wonder if she's sometimes inebriated in public, you only have to watch her speech where she's not. Once you see her operating at 100% as she was during her speech, there's no doubt that the other thing is inebriated. There's no doubt at all. And you can even see that she's picking her spots. When she does a national speech or a debate, definitely not inebriated. Not a suggestion, not a hint, nothing. But when she's talking to a friendly, a friendly like students or a little group of people who love her, she's drunk as a... we've seen it so many times. There's no doubt about it. Or inebriated in some fashion.

The other thing I haven't heard anybody say yet, but let me be the first to point it out. So she gives a speech that was largely about her getting serious about the border. Did anybody notice that the speech was all about her? Here's what I expect when you've got a massive border problem and somebody's running for president. Here's what I'm going to do about the border. I'm going to build a wall. I'm going to reverse the executive orders. I'm going to get rid of this fake asylum thing. So that's what you would say if you came there to tell people how you're going to fix something.

But she's got a little problem because any of those ideas, if they sound good, somebody's going to say, so why didn't you do that already? Joe Biden says you're in charge of everything. So she can't really come out and say here's a bunch of stuff I'm going to do. The only thing she said specifically she's going to do is she wants to create a path to citizenship, which is making the problem better or worse? Worse. The only concrete suggestion is something that whether you're on the left or the right you'd say, well that's creating an incentive to come here. That's worse. That's not better. That's worse.

But here's the part that once you hear it, if you listen to it again, listen for this. She only talked about herself. The only time she talked about somebody else, she talked about the poor migrants, the non-citizens. What she didn't talk about is the pain and destruction so much that's coming on the American citizens. So here's her talking about the border. "I was a prosecutor." Okay, we're not hiring you to be a prosecutor. "I have toured the tunnels." Okay, I mean we all know there are tunnels. Does that make you a little extra qualified because you've been in one? "You wouldn't believe how smooth the walls are of the tunnels under the border." Okay, well you know maybe it could be true that Trump is not aware how smooth the walls are on the tunnels under the border. That's not much of a selling point for you. Well, Trump doesn't even know how smooth the walls are. It's not like he's in favor of the tunnels.

So she had... she just went on forever. The entire time I listened, I didn't hear it all, but the entire time I did listen she only talked about herself and none of it was relevant. You're a prosecutor, got it. So because you're a prosecutor and your entity prosecuted some people in this context, what do you know that I don't know? Do I not know that fentanyl is coming across the border and probably killed my stepson? Everybody knows that. Do you not know that the cartels are in charge at the border? Do you not know that millions of people will come? What is it we don't know that we're now educated because we know you were once a prosecutor and that the walls of the tunnels were shiny? You got nothing. You got nothing, lady.

Meanwhile the border patrol said yet another lie. As with all things border-related, she was nowhere to be found when we needed her. She ignored the border problems until she... that she created over three years and admitted that the immigration system under her and Biden was broken. So she said she was going to fix the problem, but isn't that really admitting that she's the source of the problem too? Because it didn't happen under Trump. He had it fixed.

Well, the amuse account on X says that Kamala Harris did some election interference by creating some campaign ads in which they had two people saying that they used to be Trump supporters but now they were in Pennsylvania and now they're not. Well it turns out that was fake. They were not real voters. Well they might vote, but there were actors who have always been lifelong Democrats. So they got two lifelong Democrat actors to pretend that they switched.

Here's my question for you. How hard would it be for Trump to find some prominent Democrats who switched to him? Well not too hard. RFK Jr., Elon Musk, Scott Adams, Sachs. There's a pretty long list. He wouldn't have to hire an actor. Trump would not have to hire an actor to say I used to be a Democrat but now I can't, I just can't do it anymore. But she had to hire actors. They couldn't find any real people.

I should tell you something. All right, so here's my summary for today. I mean I'm not ending, but this will capture my thoughts. I think it's kind of stunning the degree to which Democrats have legalized crime while turning the Department of Justice, who should be fighting the crime, into the criminals. In other words, lawfare, etc.

So let me just give you some examples. So here's examples of Democrats who are basically legalizing crime. Now that's a little hyperbole when I say legalizing crime, but I'll give you the examples and you'll see why the hyperbole fits. They wanted to defund the police. They wanted to stop arresting shoplifters up to a certain dollar amount, which caused stores to close and massive crime. They're letting the homeless control the sidewalks with everything that brings with it. They're creating an asylum path for migrants who are willing to lie. The migrant process is a legal process but not if you lie. If you lie and say that you're coming for asylum but you're really not coming for asylum, they have legalized that crime. They've essentially made it legal to lie that you're here for asylum because nobody's going to get punished for it and it's the obvious way to go if you're coming in.

They created the sanctuary cities to thwart any legal processes about the immigrants. Lie about the amount of crime incoming. So they lied about how much crime is coming across the border. They allowed teams of assassins and terrorists into the country. They are pushing DEI which is literally legalized discrimination against white people, white males. That's illegal. They censor Americans via proxy. This is the Mike Benz stuff where we know that the State Department and the Democrats get European and other entities, Brazilian, to do the things that they couldn't legally do to citizens. So they just use external entities to put the pressure on X and other platforms, etc.

So they're censoring. They want to take your guns away of course. There's the rhetoric that engages assassinations in my opinion. They've got elections that can't be fully audited which supports criminal acts during the elections. And in Manhattan apparently 60% of felonies are reduced to misdemeanors. So that's Alvin Bragg. 60% of felonies are reduced to misdemeanors. Now some are always... I mean that's not the first time that's ever happened but 60% feels like a lot to me. And the lesser charges are just released.

All right, so that's a case of the Democrats making, effectively, legal, not technically legal in every case but effectively legalizing crime across a whole broad range of important topics. What did that do? It made the entire country unsafe and inner cities extra, extra unsafe. But at the same time that they were making criminals legal, they were making the people whose job it is to fight crime, they turned them into criminals.

So they turn the criminals into legal things like, oh yeah you could just say asylum and you could come in. Ah you could take up to $950, still technically illegal but we're not going to do much about it, right? So they legalized crime across a whole broad array of categories and then they took the people who were supposed to fight that crime and they literally turned them into criminals. Because the lawfare against Trump in my opinion is purely criminal. The J6, the degree to which they were overcharged in my opinion is just purely criminal. And they've canceled a lot of people for supporting Trump in the media and supporters and they've gone after his supporters, are trying to take him down.

And if you put all this together it looks like a plan to destroy America. It looks intentional. Now I usually avoid any kind of conspiracy theory that deep. I try to because when you just look at a bunch of patterns it's easy to convince yourself that the patterns mean more than they do. But holy hell that's a lot of pattern.

Let me give you... yeah and apparently ICE has known, which means the administration has known, they let in 663,000 people with criminal histories. 13,000 were convicted of homicide. Convicted. And they let them into the country. 16,000 for sexual assaults and 1,845 facing homicide charges.

Now speaking of Shawn Ryan, in his podcast I'm going to ask you for a favor. I watched a clip in which he had an author on just recently. Shawn Ryan did. And I didn't catch the author's name or the name of his book. So if you saw it and you probably did or maybe you could Google it for me, could you put in the comments the name of the author? Once I tell you what the topic was you'll recognize it. Suddenly he gets his due credit because the author was very, very convincing.

And here's a story that I heard from the author on Shawn Ryan's podcast. And I'm interested if you've ever heard of this before. So Obama wanted DEI and how it happened that it was everywhere in the country was somewhat clever and I'd never heard this before. So you got a president who wants DEI to be a big thing and he worked with John Brennan and also with the various government entities. And the idea was if you could get the government to push DEI and to really embrace it and also hire a lot of people for those agencies that are under the DEI umbrella, that further will make DEI a big thing.

But here's the part I didn't realize before. That if you make the government entities and agencies all DEI advocates, they're going to force companies to be DEI because those companies need approvals and need to work productively with entities within the government. So all you have to do is get the government to push DEI and then the government will push each of the agencies and people who have some control over individuals and companies can then push it themselves.

And apparently John Brennan has said it's one of his greatest accomplishments or the greatest accomplishment of his career was bringing DEI to the CIA when he was in charge of it. And I believe that over 50% of the CIA now is women and that was part of his accomplishments he says.

So when I look at DEI, which is literally illegal, that is tearing the country apart and has created a system which guarantees incompetence. Not because of the individuals, not because of anybody's genes or culture or chromosomes or DNA or anything like that. That's a separate, that's not in the conversation. It's just that the pool of applicants to fulfill DEI is smallish and if you have to do it you're going to just hire less qualified people.

And what we should see under a DEI environment within one decade, you should see every major institution crumble. That would be the prediction that you could predict on paper. And again not because of anybody's DNA, not because of anybody's race or culture, nothing to do with that. It's just that if you force a constraint on a thing that's barely working in the first place, which is the economy, the economy is always delicately between working great and failing. There's always that small difference between huge economic success and well that didn't work. And DEI is by far enough to move you from the great economic success to everything fell apart and we're not sure why. Just everything we tried to do didn't work. You made a phone call to tech support, they couldn't help you. You know, basically nothing works.

So we are in that phase. We are in the predictable stage of everything up because we have too many incompetent people in every organization and it was intentional. Now if you ask them they'd say we're trying to make the organizations look like America, make sure everybody has opportunity. I like all of that on paper. I like it all. It's just if the only way you can implement it is a bunch of managers saying I'm going to get fired unless I hire somebody who's a DEI person and even if I can't find a good one I'm gonna have to take a chance until everything falls apart. And that's where we are. Everything's falling apart and honestly it's mostly a DEI problem more than anything. It's DEI.

Now on top of that everything's more complicated every year. So in theory an average person who could do a reasonable job at something no longer can. So the complexity of everything makes it so if you're not in the top 20% of capability you're not going to be able to do anything. Everything's just too hard. You know back when you just had to milk a cow, oh almost everybody could do it. All you had to do is shoot an animal and skin it. Well most people could do it with a little bit of practice. But most people can't do most jobs now. They're just too complicated anyway.

Frank Luntz says that for the first time in a long time there are more people registered as Republicans than Democrats in the entire country. Did you see that coming? I did not see that coming. I have to admit that one snuck up on me. Because you know what it is about Republicans that really stands out and I've always loved this about conservatives and Republicans. They're really about just getting the work done. They're not so much about making sure that everybody knows it. So there's something about this number that says to me that Republicans just got to work and said we can't give up the country. If there are more Democrats than there are Republicans we're all dead. And so since the obvious solution to having more Democrats than Republicans is you register more Republicans, they did.

Now again Scott Presler gets a huge bit of credit for what he did especially in Pennsylvania but there must be a lot more people working on this. I don't know, is this the Lara Trump part of the world? I'm not sure if what she's doing is directly or indirectly related to this. Now some of this might be that the Democrats did such a bad job that people are hiding as independents because I think that happens. If Biden is just embarrassing, people will say I'm an independent. Yeah, not my fault. Sure I voted for him but now I'm independent. Now I'm independent. So some of it is fake. People just hiding because they don't want to take the heat. But it's never been this way before and it's not even that close. There's 48% Republican and 45% Democrat now.

There's still so many... wait a minute this can't be right. How's that? No that's not right. These numbers can't be right because that would mean that the independents are... no this can't be right. I thought independents were about a third of voters. Am I wrong about that? The last time I saw these numbers the independents, Democrats and Republicans were roughly about the same number and this would suggest that there are very few independents. So that can't be right.

All right I'm going to pivot. My pivot is there's something wrong with these numbers. It could be that they're only comparing people who are registered one way or the other which you know I would need more detail to know if that's what's happening. But let's say that the numbers are true. What would that suggest would be the likely vote? If there really are more Republicans registered than Democrats, who would win the not the electoral vote but the overall national vote? Should be the one who's got the most people registered because that's what it's been before. You know when there were more Democrats and sure enough they won the national vote even when they lost the Electoral College.

So what would be the result hypothetically if these numbers held and let's say independents, we don't know this but let's say independents match to these ratios. I think independents are going to be far more for Trump but let's say it's just this much. That would suggest a landslide, right? If Trump wins the popular vote nationwide the electoral vote is a landslide. Now I need somebody smart to tell me I'm wrong about that but I think I'm right.

So you've got the national polls which depending on how they weight things and how they ask the question and some assumptions that they make when they collect their data, they look a little sketchy don't they? Now the national polls sometimes say Kamala ahead sometimes by a lot, sometimes they say Trump's ahead sometimes by a good amount. So the national polls appear to be completely funky and unreliable at this moment.

But do you think that we can accurately count how many people have registered as Republicans versus Democrats? Yes, because that doesn't require an assumption and it doesn't require any... there's not much room for weasel. It's probably just data that you're either registered or you're not. So if you're going to believe one, what would be more believable? That the Republican registrations have surged which would indicate a landslide for Trump or that the individual polls which we've never trusted in the past and always seem to get mysteriously accurate right toward the election sort of in October.

Do you know what the October surprise is yet? One of them. There's probably going to be lots of them. Have you figured out the October surprise? Well if this is true, the Republican registrations have now outnumbered Democrat registrations, this election is over in terms of voting. You know I'm going to agree with Eric Weinstein that we don't know if Trump will become president because the bad actors, it looks like there's no limits to what they'd be willing to do and I mean actually no limits. So I think Trump probably has a dominant position and it looks like a landslide if nothing changes. But remember there are going to be lots of changes.

So here's what I think will be your October surprise. Now can't guarantee it, can't guarantee it, but the pollsters are all going to be showing a landslide by election day. Because if they don't, if they don't then next election you're going to say there was a landslide and you weren't even close. Why should we listen to you again? Why should we pay you for your stuff? Why should we ever report what you said again? So it becomes really important for the pollsters to end up in the top five, top ten. So if they're way off a few weeks before election, which is what October... the October surprise is going to be the polls. Now you knew it was going to happen but here's the surprise. It's going to be bigger than you thought. I think the surprise is going to be the degree of pollster shenanigans that are happening in September are beyond what you imagined was possible. That's what I think will be your surprise. Now I could be wrong, right? It'd be easy to be wrong about this.

But when you see the people on the streets, I just saw another person on the street thing. They're asking just young people who they supported. It seems to be Trump every time somebody goes on the street. And even if maybe it was always close to half and half, the Trump supporters who are young will say it out loud with no embarrassment whatsoever as if it's the cooler thing to do now. And once you see how many 20-somethings are just yelling Trump into the camera so happy to support him, perfectly happy that they're seen by their fellow students, seen by whoever is going to see the video, there's nothing holding it back. Trump. And I think it's because eating the dogs, eating the cats is what made him popular with young people. Well plus the assassination attempt was remarkable, the fight fight fight part. But the cats and the dogs thing is still trending on TikTok and when you see people's reaction to him and you see the number of people who are still dancing to that, something's happening. Something big's happening.

All right. Of course you know the big news is Israel took out the head of Hezbollah with a gigantic set of bombs. Bunker busters I guess. Yes. So here's what happened. See how impressed you are by this. So Hezbollah has reportedly, I don't know, 100,000 rockets that could be fired at Israel. If they were to fire them all at the same time or in big waves then the Iron Dome would have a tough time getting them all just because of numbers. So really the threat that Hezbollah had was that we'll fire them in big waves at the same time. It wasn't really a risk if they did one here or there. The Iron Dome could get them and chances are it wasn't going to hit anything anyway.

So what do you think it takes for Hezbollah to fire all of their stuff at the same time? Well coordination obviously. Coordination. And what does that take? Well some kind of communication. And what does that take? Well you're going to have to use some kind of digital communication. And apparently because they thought the cell phones could be too easily tracked by Israel they had moved to pagers and walkie-talkies. Which as you know Israel found a way to make explody.

So once all their pagers and walkie-talkies exploded, what's next? Well the first thing that you might not realize is that they may have lost their ability to coordinate an attack. Because if they don't do it all at the same time they're just wasting their missiles. Send up three missiles, Israel knocks down three missiles and you're done. So if you can't shoot them all at the same time you've lost your only weapon. The one that anybody's worried about. So I can't say for sure that they lost that ability but they haven't launched a big wave of missiles and they did lose all of their leadership.

And the last guy that was left said to himself, huh I'm going to have to figure out how to rebuild and get things coordinated again but I better not use any digital means. So send out the runners and get the third level down of commanders because the other ones have all been killed and we'll meet in my command bunker. Yeah we're whatever's left of the leadership of Hezbollah after most of it's already been killed. We're going to meet in my well-known command bunker. My well-known, well-identified command bunker. Knowing that there are obviously spies working because without the spies Israel would not have been able to kill all of the top guys. Commander already wherever they were they got them all. Which very heavily suggests there's an insider who's saying he's in a blue car, he's heading down the street now.

So the head of Hezbollah, clearly not a strategic genius, decided to get what was left of Hezbollah to meet him in person in his command bunker. Well what do you think happened then? I'm not supposed to laugh at war but did this really happen? Did Israel really figure out a way to kill all the leaders and then make sure that the new team of leaders all went in the same place at the same time and that they would know where they were and when they were there and then they would drop a bunch of bunker busters on it and just make it a hole in the ground?

Well there's nothing funny about this situation but Hezbollah had been telling a lot of lies and Israel decided to debunk them. That's right they debunked them. And when they were done the thing that used to be called a command bunker looked a lot like Justin Bieber's sphincter after a Diddy party. I'll just let you live with that one for a while. Take your time. Take your time. Whenever you're done we'll get back to it. Okay yeah looked like Justin Bieber's sphincter after a Diddy party.

Anyway we don't see them firing back a whole bunch of missiles. Iran apparently had a big old meeting and Iran thinks, some people are saying Iran is going to send some troops to Lebanon. I don't know if that's a good idea for them but it gets better. Apparently Israel hacked the airport control tower for Lebanon, Beirut I guess. And since we know that Iran apparently was shipping in supplies and weapons to Hezbollah they got to the control tower, took it over with hackers and told the planes they better turn around because they're in trouble if they land. And there's some evidence that one of the planes that was coming from Iran to Lebanon turned around immediately. Turned around immediately which means it was probably full of weapons. Don't know for sure but maybe.

Well if any of this is true Israel basically just rewrote all the war books about how you do anything. The level of brilliance that appears to be here... now remember this is still fog of war propaganda. We're getting a version of the news that says Israel is beyond brilliant. So just be careful that you're maybe not seeing all the warts. Maybe things weren't as clean and maybe there was some luck involved and so we don't know everything. But if we were just to judge it on the surface it would be the greatest military strategic success of my life. I mean the amount that I am impressed by what Israel's done militarily. And again I want to, if somebody is new to me, I don't back Israel because they don't back me. It's not my job to back Israel. Now they're an ally and I take that seriously but I'm an American so I'm sitting over here caring what's good for me. Israel is just something I'm observing. And sometimes I say to myself all right if that happened to America how would we act? Well we're full of DEI so we couldn't pull that off but I wish we could. I wish we were that smart anyway.

There's a new drone. South Korea made a drone that works on hydrogen. It's a hydrogen drone. Tech Times says so. It's got a 5,800 mile range and can stay in the air for hours compared to 30 minutes for a normal drone. So if you've got something that can lift some weight and can go 5,800 miles and stay in the air for hours, the degree of warfare you can do with small drones, because these would be smallish ones, is a whole new level.

So I don't know how close we are to an all-robot war where it's just drones in the sky because you don't want to waste a pilot and robot dogs on the ground. We're pretty close. We're pretty close. We might actually get to the point where if the robots on one side defeat the robots on the other that the humans will just surrender rather than send humans to fight their robots which would just be slaughter. We'll just say all right you robots beat our robots. We don't like it but you're in charge now. You own our country. We're getting there. I think you'll see it in your lifetime.

Judge Chutkan, according to Jeff Clark, she's gaming with the timing of things so that a few weeks before the election there would be some kind of reveal from Jack Smith. So Jack Smith the DA he's got some materials that we haven't seen but the redacted version might come out mid-October. Now whatever a prosecutor of Trump produces in mid-October is going to be bad for Trump. Now do you think it's a huge coincidence that the badness would come out at the very worst time? Do we expect that whatever badness he produces is real like actually in context and accurate? Nope. I do not believe that. I believe that they would, because remember Department of Justice are criminals and the criminals are now legal. So this would be the Department of Justice. Now they're criminals. So the criminal thing to do would be to make up a bunch of and know that there's no time to correct it before the election and just depend on the fake news to say it's all true and then after the election you do the fact check. It's like oh yeah I guess this wasn't as true as we thought. Sorry about that. Yeah yeah sorry. That's what it looks like.

Well one of my favorite things yesterday was that Trump and Zelensky met. Now that's unusual because Trump is not the sitting president so you have to be delicate about what you can and cannot do in that situation. But I loved the press conference after where Trump, his 6'3" is standing over Zelensky who's 5'6" or whatever he is, and Zelensky just looked like he'd just been punished by his parents. Like he looked like a defeated... he didn't look like Zelensky of old. "Give us weapons. We'll fight every day. We win." And Trump is just saying... what was Trump saying? He was saying basically it's over. We need to negotiate a deal. You know we'll just figure out who gets what land. We'll sort it out.

Now that's when Zelensky in the past would have said something like no we will fight. We must get every inch of land back. We will never quit. They can't steal our land. The best he could do because he knows there's a good chance he's going to be dealing with Trump in the future, the best he could do is remind us that Russia is on Ukrainian land and so when they negotiate you know that should be top of mind. But even he was talking about negotiating now. Correct me if I'm wrong. So now Zelensky seems on board with negotiating and obviously some kind of land agreement will have to happen. Putin of course is interested in negotiating. And they're the two sides. Who's not interested in negotiating? Democrats and the deep state and the military-industrial complex.

But if you put Trump in there there's nobody left who wants the war. Zelensky doesn't really want any more of it. You know he'd love to win but doesn't seem to be an option so forget about that. Yeah all it takes is a President Trump. Now when he'd been saying he could get it done in a day you know that's hyperbole. Nobody could do it in a day. But basically he could because all it takes is Trump to be president and then there's nobody in the game who wants to keep fighting because Ukraine and Russia definitely don't. They definitely don't. And as long as Trump doesn't there's nobody left. So yes he could wind it up soon as he gets in there.

I wonder if Trump actually worried that he could end the war before he got in office and before there's even an election so that it wouldn't count in his benefit on the election. But if you want to end this war you now have a 100% obvious way to do it that you control as a citizen. You can just vote for Trump and this war is over. It really is.

All right Bill Maher had a show last night. We always talk about him. He is a good indicator of what people are thinking and on that basis it's fascinating. And he actually said that we should defend Ukraine and that it's basically so little money for the United States that we're getting some benefit of degrading Russia. We're protecting our ally, kind of an ally. And this is what Maher says about the money. He says that basically none of us know that none of us can tell the difference the amount of money we spent in Ukraine. He's saying that you and I don't feel it. To which I say have you heard of inflation?

Now I don't know how much of the deficit per year is in the over a trillion dollar range. Is it like 1.3 trillion somewhere in that range? And how much do we give to Ukraine every year? A few hundred billion? Do we spend a few hundred billion per year? So maybe 15% of our deficit something like that. And then of course we have to build up our own military because we're sending our bullets over there so we got to buy our own bullets or something. So he is correct that we cannot identify the difference in our life from the Ukraine expenses. I can't identify okay how much of my inflation was because that war. Might be 10%. But it's also not ending and the amount we're spending isn't really the total issue. It's about whether we should be having a war with a nuclear power and what are we getting from it and is it worth 200 billion. And if we've got 200 billion extra to spend on anything is that where you want it to go? Because 200 billion is real money.

Anyway so far it's been 10 billion here 7 billion in there. I don't know what it adds up to.

All right Vivek Ramaswamy says that Musk is super hardcore about firing federal employees working with Trump. And I saw this on the George account. Good account to follow on X. George. Vivek Ramaswamy said it looks like Elon will use OIC on the government's fat. And here's a quote. Elon's pretty hardcore. And Vivek says I said 75% of the federal bureaucrats. He said you need to put at least 75. So Elon Musk's correction to Vivek who wanted to get rid of 75% of the bureaucrats was you should say at least. How much do you love that? How much do you love that? That if you could imagine that you could ever get rid of 75% of the bureaucrats that you should really be saying more. I just love that. I don't know that they can get rid of more than 75% but the fact that he's not going to be limited by your 75% estimate, I love that it's at least 75%.

Anyway according to the Gateway Pundit, Antonio Gracias, writer, he's got an argument in their opinion piece that liberal policies are driving up our obesity rates now up to 40% of the adults or is it everybody? 40% are obese. I don't know if that's 40% of adults and 20% of children. Now when I saw that opinion I said to myself I don't know if I want to read this because I don't think he's going to convince me that liberal policies are making people fat. Because I said to myself how are liberal policies making anybody fat? Explain that.

And he talked about how school gym classes are cutting way back so kids are less active in school. And I said public schools. Okay Democrats pretty much have a lock on everything that happens in the public school. So yeah I guess okay. Yeah less physical activity sure. Then there's fat acceptance. The idea that Democrats are pushing the idea that you don't need to lose weight. You're perfectly healthy. Nobody should judge you. And while I agree with the notion that I don't like fat shaming there's no question that the public attitude toward it has an impact on how people act, right? If people say you're fine you can be any weight you want there's going to be more people overweight. If the public says cruelly don't be like that there's probably going to be less of it. People are going to try harder.

Now there might also be some food related illnesses but that's a separate question. I'm talking about anorexia for example. There are food deserts now in a lot of poor areas because the crime was so high that places that would sell you healthier food like a grocery store just said oh we're out. Here's there's still McDonald's so good luck. That feels fair. And then of course the pandemic and the lockdown had some lasting effects. So I'm not sure how much of the obesity is because of liberal policies but I do think that Antonio made his case. He made his case. It's just we can't tell what percentage of the whole problem is caused by that but it's not making it better anyway.

There's now jets that are going to be able to do automatic takeoffs and landings according to CNN. And if you didn't know this and this is weird, the more advanced planes could already land in bad weather and stuff on instruments. Well it could land autonomously. So even if the pilot dropped dead the advanced planes could just land and the landing some say the machine would do it better than the pilot. Pilot can make a human error. The machine's much less likely. But what I didn't know is that the planes were not equipped to take off autonomously which seems weird. It seems like taking off would be easier than landing but taking off is actually harder I mean where it can be. So it's actually a big deal that airplanes are learning to take off on their own at the same time that robotaxis are coming on. So the idea of having a human sitting behind a steering wheel for anything it will be largely defunct except for recreational stuff like I don't know maybe your fishing boat or something anyway.

And that ladies and gentlemen is all I wanted to say that's worth saying today. We'll keep an eye on whatever is happening with Hezbollah and Israel but as I've said before if Israel's going to get tough with its enemies and neighbors there's never been a better time in history to do it. Because first of all it seems like they have a good handle on the military strategy obviously but also there's no leadership in the United States. So if they can get themselves a little bit pregnant you know make sure that they're well into a war against Hezbollah or Iran or whoever they decide to go to war with, if they do it now Trump won't be able to stop them because he's not president and Biden's barely a president and Harris is out on the road. So if you were going to make a big move and you're Israel it's going to happen now. So I would expect maximum chaos.

But there's also a possibility that Israel will have a surprisingly fast and good result in Lebanon because a lot of the Lebanese I'm hearing are not so pro-Hezbollah. So if Israel could find a way to be accurate enough to take out Hezbollah without killing much in the way of innocent Lebanese people who don't like Hezbollah either they might be able to find a workable situation there maybe. Imagine how different that would be if Lebanon were no longer an enemy of Israel or at least parts of it. So Hezbollah being bad actors and Hamas being bad actors maybe something can change. We'll see.

All right ladies and gentlemen that's all I have for you. I'm going to talk to the local subscribers privately because of their awesomeness but I'll see the rest of you on YouTube and Rumble and X tomorrow same time same place. Bye for now.

We've got 30 seconds to sip.

oh my god I've got this little itch right in the back of my back of my shoulders where I can't reach this is why you need the telescoping bag scratcher you should have one everywhere because there's this one little area I can't reach back there oh my god oh oh my god oh so good all right well if you didn't notice the dilber comic is uh up it's the reborn comic now normally Dilbert well not normally the the Dilbert comic and the Dilbert reborn comic typically um they don't do any politics so this isn't really politics it's just dog bir picking up on a meme but I thought you'd like it let me read it to you in case you're listening dogbe says to Dilbert they're just sitting around the breakfast table and dilber says I'm sorry doger says when the Hunter's bullet grazed my ear I dropped to the ground out of instinct then I jumped up and looked at the pack of wolves I had come to lead and yelled bite bite bite and he's raising his fist like Trump did your story and then dber says your story is inspiring but derivative and dogar says I didn't want to reinvent the wheel I mean stick with what works right people stick with what works anyway that's available only um on the yeah you have to subscribe to see dber reborn either on uh the locals platform Scott adams.

locals.com or or where's the show I'm trying to open it here it is huh um or you can see it on uh the X uh the xplatform if you subscribe oh by the way the 2025 dilber calendar is available for pre-sale the desk page a day desk calendar made in America for the first time and it's at uh if you go to dilbert.com you'll see the link for a pre-sale it's the only place you can get it it's not going to be on Amazon not now orever and it won't be in bookstores only one link it's the only way you can get it made in America good morning everybody and welcome to coffee with Scott Adams the greatest experience of your life if you'd like to take this up to levels that nobody can really understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a cuper muger glass a tanker shell s a canteen juger flask of vess of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dope mean the end of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous hip and it happens now go the best I wonder if the coffee is making me healthier well there's a new study that that's discussed in brink Zone that coffee increases your testosterone and your Anor robic power that's right a little bit of coffee and you'll be stronger and have more testosterone you want me to prove it watch this all right this is really good fabric on this t-shirt and I didn't want to hurt it anyway but trust me I could have if I tried a little harder well here's the kind of stories I see every day um lately so the Michigan mailin ballots are now only going to be counted if there's a proof of signature this is a gateway bundit reporting this to which I said to myself wait a minute are you telling me that in the past the Michigan mail and ballots didn't need any signature verification the most basic thing you would do no no and wait a minute wait a minute are you telling me that they're only just barely fixing this in time for the election that's right just a few weeks before the actual election but thank goodness thank goodness there's no other irregularity to report about the election well Jim Jordan has accused the Department of Homeland Security Secretary of uh stonewalling the Ohio election Integrity according to a raw story so Jim Jordan says the homeland security is refusing to respond to requests from Ohio's top election official for federal citizenship verification records I guess they want to make sure that the people who are voting are citizens but the Department of Homeland Security is stonewalling them do you know how many stories I see every day almost all of them on X about something that is clearly broken in our election system and somebody's trying to fix it now sometimes successfully sometimes they get stonewalled but if we have a pristine election system that we are quite all sure has been perfect why are so many things getting fixed are do people who we elect in various states are are they so dumb that they don't know the elections are perfect the way they are and they think they're fixing something that ain't broke or is it stuff that's really obviously broken and was obviously broken before and yet the new news that you thought was real told you well we know those elections were good yeah you can know what you don't know that's what the news told you here here's a list of things that can't be known that we know but wait you that can't be known yeah but we know it right but there isn't any way to know it but we know it well how do you know it well we didn't look into it no not looking into it is not how you know things well well there were no complaints that we saw but you just said you didn't look into it that's right so if you don't look into it you can be sure what happened exactly and that's actually what the news has been telling us for years and people just s at home going uhhuh uhhuh didn't look into it must be a good election I I can I can think of no better evidence of a good election then we didn't really look into it oh oh by the way it's designed so you can't fully audit it yeah just normal stuff nothing to be concerned about how many Democrats will hear either of those stories today how many Democrats are going to hear about Michigan not checking signatures in the past oh my God or or that uh we're not entirely sure who are citizens and should be able to vote do you think any Democrats will hear that no no it'll be basically zero um let's see what does the public think about election Integrity well it used to be that uh Republicans were confident in the system and Democrats thought it might be a little sketchy but according to Gallup that is somewhat reversed and now the Republicans think the elections are more sketchy than the Democrats but both sides think they're a little bit of sketchy so 57% of those ped by Gallup uh said that they will be um only somewhat confident in the accuracy of the election where 24% say they're not too confident and a whopping 19% say they're not confident at all I would have added those two together but only 57% of the public thinks they're very or even somewhat confident in the results does that sound about right to you does that sound like a system that's been designed to make us confident that we know what happened no I don't think you can get to only 57% think the election is fair and and reliable unless it's designed to keep you from knowing who won our elections let me say it again are very obviously very obviously designed so you don't know who one I think that's the only thing you need to know if you spent a few minutes looking at the design of the system and then I said to you all right would you know if the post office threw away some ballots no you would how would you know that how would you catch that in an audit there's no way to catch that no it's uncatchable uh if I told you that a state actor whether it's the CIA or some other country had worked with an Insider at one of the voting machines or tabulator companies and had hacked it with the help of an Insider to cover up any Trail would you be able to spot that no no you wouldn't no there's no way you could catch that what would be the most obvious way that anybody would cheat well one of those Ways How about if um somebody was a non-citizen and yet they had a they got a mail in vote and then they voted what part of the process checks all those names against Real voters well maybe some states do but not all of them so the most obvious ways that anybody would think of you know if you were going to think of a way to cheat none of them are checkable the most obvious ways you would cheat and so to imagine that you could know who won an election is is sort of just naive yeah but there we are so you then did a fact check on KL Harris's claims about manufacturing jobs so she said something about um Trump being bad and losing manufacturing jobs and Biden being good and getting them back but apparently he was just wildly you know incorrect just a lie basically but CNN fact checked them now here's my question have you noticed the selectivity of CNN's fact checking how many how many votes do you think got changed because somebody exaggerated or had a wrong data about manufacturing none none no e even if the Democrats heard that this was a fake claim and it was a lie there's probably not even one Democrat who's going to changed their vote because somebody exaggerated or you know said something about manufacturing jobs you've got two candidates who both say they want to bring manufacturing back to the us both of them are going to use hyperbole about their numbers both of them are going to choose a a period of time that makes their thing look good both of them are going to pad things it has no effect on the actual outcome of the vote now you know it would if they fact checked the hoaxes if they fact checked all the hoaxes every time she used one that would affect the election because nobody nobody thinks that an ordinary lie told by a politician is you know different or even noteworthy or nobody cares it's just part of the process but if you told if you told the CNN and msnb view Ms.

MSNBC viewers that their entire worldview was created by a a a mesh network of hoaxes that the media creates that would change some votes because we sought that a number of the people who said I've been a lifetime Democrat but I changed my vote the number one thing they point out is what's the number one thing that people mention when they say they changed to give up the Democrats the fine people hoax the fine people hoax is the T pole hoax meaning it's the one that keeps all the other hoaxes alive if you believed the fine people hoax then you accepted as a given that Trump was the worst person in the world and would say any crazy thing now since the find people hoax is not true then suddenly all the other hoaxes once you learn it's not true and how they did it and how and how blatantly it was done I think the thing about the fine people hoax is that you didn't have to really do research to to find out it was a lie and that the entire left-leaning media landscaped were all in on it they all knew the truth because they had the video too so that one's a real you know that that one just makes your brain go wait a minute what how badly were they lying to me because it's one thing when a candidate tells a lie like I said you just expect that but when the entire media landscape coordinates with the Democrats to tell you a lie like to fine people hoax that can change your mind when you find out that you were a victim of that and then that there are 20 more just like it there are 20 more the fine people hoax was just the T pole you still needed other you know polls to to hold things up but the main 10 pole was that one and I I'd like to say that I'm happy that I worked for seven years to De bunka you know Cortez Joel poock uh we all worked like the three of us just like work like maniacs for three years every time that popped up to make sure that people saw the counter you know the debunk anyway haris goes to the Border uh which gives I don't think anybody's having more fun in the last few months than Scott Jennings who is uh I guess he would represent the Republican opinion on CNN now I'd like to give CNN a a little bit of credit so I think it's it's prudent to call balls and Strikes and not just be you know in the bag for one team completely so the fact that uh Scott Jennings is not only very effective in his Communications on behalf of Republicans but he does get a lot of screen time he gets a lot of screen time he shows up in clips and um he's doing a hell of a job if if you haven't watched any of Scott Jennings debunking of the CNN people while they watch you have to watch it not just for what he says because he he does a great job of framing things but you have to watch the faces of the panelists when they're forced to listen to the truth on CNN because they all know they're Liars they're they're completely aware of what they're doing so when they give him time and they let him talk you just have to I've I reposted a few an acts if you want to see them you just have to see the faces while they listen they they try to do the the smug smile but the smile says I know you got us it's sort of a you know I'm I'm doing an impression now if you're hearing only audio it's that the smug smile it's toothless so a real smile shows your teeth usually here's a real smile see here's a real smile it's all teethy here here's a smile that says Scott Jennings is making you look like you have a brain the size of a squirrel and a million people are watching him do it while your face is on the screen yeah see that that's the face when you're being Dunked On by Scott Jennings on CNN M I'm happy I'm happy but not happy enough so you can see my teeth I'm so happy look at my smile I'm not even bothered by it at all I'm not even bothered by being called out as a ridiculous propagandist right in front of the world look at me smiling it's not bothering me a bit so that's hilarious I recommend it here's what Scott Jenning said uh when Harris went to the Border he said arsonist returns to scene of crime I told you he's going to reframing arsonist returns to scene of crime and we're done I I could continue talking about this topic of KL Harris visiting the Border but everything I say is just going to fit under this one reframe arsonist returns to scene of crime do I need to tell anybody that the Biden Administration is 100% responsible for everything we say or that she was the borders are or if you don't like using common words for stuff just just in control of things at the Border in some general way that never happened three and a half years of complete absolute failure to the point where it looks like intentional treason we don't know that it is but sure looks like it You Can't Fail Harder than she has failed and Biden has failed at the border You Can't Fail Harder than that and she returns to the scene of the crime like an arsonist anyway and uh Scott Jennings points out there was a huge Tactical mistake to just make sure that people were really paying attention to the Border while Harris tells you it's a giant problem while you say but you caused the problem why are you now acting like you don't know what caused it and why why are you there you should be hiding in shame for what you've done and the fact that she went to the border and simply made the Border issue more prominent in the news yeah that's What mattered what didn't matter were her clever little arguments and stuff about it no nobody cares about that all they care about is we spent more time thinking about criminals coming across the border now as luck would have it the the ice report came out at the same time saying that the number of criminals literally murderers and rapists were in the tens of thousands the ones we know about imagine how many people that maybe murdered somebody and got away with it and still came here so at the same time the public is being exposed we hope maybe no Democrats ever saw that data but it was national news at least on the right and I think Scott Jennings mentioned these numbers too so he he penetrated the CNN audience with that so at the same time we're seeing massive unreported until now numbers of criminals that we have deliberately deliberately led into the country at the same time we're seeing reports that Isis Isis is sneaking people into the country at the same time we're hearing that maybe I don't know Hezbollah or some other damn thing is coming in with shoulder-mounted missiles and there's a bunch of assassin teams coming through the border and there there are tens of thousands of Chinese military looking people coming through the Border we let everybody in it's the biggest failure in American politics yeah let me say that let me say that with a little bit of confidence in the history of American government opening the border the way it was done is the biggest mistake in American history if you could come up with a better example of a bigger mistake I don't know now and the thing is we haven't seen the uh the price of that yet the price is yet to be paid because we're letting in a whole bunch of terrorists at the same time Iran is going to go to war with Israel maybe we'll talk about that and what would Iran do what have we've been warned by the people who know how things work in this world what is Iran going to do if let's say Iran itself is attacked as opposed to its proxies they're going to attack inside the United States your lights are going to go off because Iran is not you know a me too follower kind of a country they have abilities they got skills and they're probably already in our cyber you they probably have already penetrated some of our systems they almost certainly have agents with weapons in the United States not that they're necessarily going to do an October 7th attack but they could certainly do things that we weren't sure if it was them or somebody else so it is in my opinion the biggest blunder in all of American government history I don't think there's a second place to that and I guess what's different about it is that it was obvious it was a blunder before they did it I mean it looks so much like somebody was trying to destroy the country it doesn't even look like this was ever a serious thing that somebody thought was a good idea it simply looks like somebody had a plan to destroy the country I'll talk more about that speaking of which Harris uh looked at the Trump border wall so she had to stand in front of the border wall that Trump built which at one point in 2019 she'd call that medieval vanity project and now she's all about building some more how do the Democrats not notice what's going on but they don't they don't seem to notice anyway um former Navy SEAL Shan Ryan who's got a podcast he was on Joe Rogan and he said the Taliban is funneling terrorist into the US to the southern border for some kind of October 7th style attack now I don't think Iran would want to do an October 7th in the United States but Isis might Isis might so that's all coming in and at the same time Harris is called for a pathway to citizenship for millions of uh of the migrants she led into the country I don't know how you could be worse to to create the biggest blunder in American history and then to top it by saying let's let's give them citizenship so they can also vote the level of incompetence is Way Beyond anything I could call accidental it doesn't look accidental nobody could be this dumb I mean nobody could really um so she gives a speech after she went to the border and uh I I would like to say as far as I could tell when she gave her speech she was not inebriated and I thought she did a great job so it was a teleprompter speech at first I thought maybe it was impromptu and I was more impressed but then when looked that oh it's teleprompter but the teleprompter she does really well now so I guess she's been doing a lot of practice on the campaign Trail but man she she read that teleprompter uh she did not cackle she had all the right motions and everything but I did note a few problems oh number one uh if you'd like to know when she's inebriated and when she's not there's a tell that is guaranteed right now I think you can tell by just the way she talks and and everything but there's one tell for whether she's inebriated and she definitely wasn't she was in full control and did a good job in Her speech here's here's her hand gestures when she's not inebriated they're crisp and they're smallish so so she'd be like dupe dupe crisp tight controlled so when she's talking her hands are very much part of a good uh presenter's hands now I'm going to give you the impression of when she's inebriated shoulders moving and hands are not tight they're all over the place let me tell you what we're going to do right that you you watch for it tight your hands D Dent Dent versus loose ants if you wonder if she's sometimes inebriated in public you only have to watch your speech where she's not once you see her operating at 100% as she was during her speech there's no doubt that the other thing is inebriated there's no doubt at all and you can even see that she's picking her spots when she does a national speech or a debate definitely not inebriated not not a s not a suggestion not a hint nothing but when she's talking to a friendly a friendly like a students or a little group of people who love her she's drunk as a we we've seen it so many times there's no doubt about it or inebriated in some fashion the other thing I haven't heard anybody say yet but uh let me be the first to point it out so she gives a speech that was largely about her you know getting serious about the Border did anybody notice that the speech was all about her here's what I expect when you've got a massive border problem and somebody's running for president here's what I'm going to do about the Border I'm going to build a wall I'm going to reverse the executive orders I'm going to get rid of this fake Asylum thing so that's what you would say if you came there to tell people how you're going to fix something but she's got a little problem because any of those ideas if they sound good somebody's going to say so why didn't you do that already Joe Biden says you're in charge of everything so she can't really come out and say Here's a bunch of stuff I'm going to do the only thing she said specifically she's going to she wants to create a path to citizenship which is making the problem better or worse worse the only concrete suggestion is something that whether you're on the left or the right you'd say well that's creating an incentive to come here that's that's worse that's not better that's worse but here's the here's the part that once you hear it if you listen to it again listen for this she only talked about herself the only time she talked about somebody else she talked about the poor migrants the non-citizens what she didn't talk about is the the pain and destruction so much that's coming on the American citizens so here's her talking about the Border I was a prosecutor okay we're not hiring you to be a prosecutor I have toured the tunnels okay I mean we all know there tunnels does that make you a little extra qualified because you've been in one you wouldn't believe how smooth the walls are of the tunnels under the Border okay well you know maybe it could be true that Trump is not aware how smooth the walls are on the tunnels under the Border that's not much of a selling point for you well Trump doesn't even know how smooth the walls are it's not like he's in favor of the the tunnels so she had she just went on forever the entire time I listened I didn't hear it all but the entire time I did listen she only talked about herself and none of it was relevant your prosecutor got it so because you're a prosecutor and your your entity prosecuted some people in this context what do you know that I don't know do do I not know that fenel is coming across the border and probably killed my stepson everybody knows that do you not know the cartels are in charge at the border do you not know that millions of people will come what is it we don't know that we're now educated because we know you were once a prosecutor and that the walls of the tunnels were shiny you got nothing you got nothing lady meanwhile the border patrol said yet another lie as with all things border related she she was nowhere to be found when we needed her she ignored the Border problems until she that she created over three years and admitted that the uh and separately admitted that the immigration system under her and Biden was broken so she said she was going to fix the problem but isn't that really admitting that she's the source of the problem too because it didn't happen under Trump he had it fixed well the amuse account on X says that comml Harris did some election interference by creating some campaign ads in which they had two people saying that they used to be Trump supporters but now they were in Pennsylvania and now they're not well it turns out that was fake they were not real voters well they might vote but there were actors who have always been lifelong Democrats so they got two lifelong Democrat actors to pretend that they switched here's my question for you how hard would it be for Trump to find some prominent Democrats who switched to him well not too hard RFK Jr.

Elon Musk Scott Adams Sachs there's pretty Amman there's pretty long list doy you know there's a long list he wouldn't have he wouldn't have to hire an actor Trump would not have to hire an actor to say I used to be Democrat but now I can't I can't just can't do it anymore but she had to hire actors they couldn't find any real people I should tell you something all right so here's my summary for today I mean I'm not ending but this this will capture my thoughts um I think it's kind of stunning the degree to which Democrats have legalized crime while turning the Department of Justice who should be fighting the crime into the criminals in other words lawfare Etc so let me let me just give you some examples so here's examples of of uh Democrats who are basically legalizing crime now that's a little hyperbole when I say legalizing crime but I'll give you the examples and you'll you'll see why the hyperbole FS uh they wanted to defund the police they wanted to stop uh and they stop arresting shoplifters up to a certain dollar Mount which caused you know stores to close and massive crime they're letting the homeless control the sidewalks with everything that brings with it they're creating an asylum path for migrants who are willing to lie the migrant process is is a legal process but not if you lie if you lie and say that you're coming for Asylum but you're really not coming for Asylum they have legalized that crime they've essentially made it legal to lie that you're here for Asylum because nobody's going to get punished for it and it's the obvious way to go if you're coming in they created The Sanctuary cities to thwart any legal processes about the uh the immigrants uh lie about the amount of uh crime incoming so they lied about how much crime is coming across the border they allowed teams of Assassins and terrorists into the country um they are pushing Dei which is literally legalized discrimination against white people white males that's illegal um they censor Americans via proxy this is the Mike Ben's stuff um where we know that the state department and the Democrats get European and other entities Brazilian to do the things that they couldn't legally do to Citizens so they just use external entities to put the pressure on you know X and other platforms Etc um so there're censoring that's you know they want to take your guns away of course there's a the rhetoric in bages and assassinations in my opinion they've got elections that can't be fully audited which supports criminal acts during the elections and in Manhattan apparently 60% of felonies are reduced to misdemeanors so that's Alvin brag 60% of felonies are reduced to misdemeanors now some are always I mean it's that's not the first time that's ever happened but 60% feels like a lot to me um and the Lesser charges are just released all right so that's a case of the Democrats making effectively legal not technically legal in every case but effectively legalizing crime across a whole broad range of important topics what did that do it made the entire country unsafe and inner cities extra extra unsafe but at the same time that they were making criminals legal they were making the people whose job it is to fight crime they turned them into criminals so they turn the criminals into legal things like oh yeah you could just just say Asylum and you could come in ah you could take up to $950 still technically illegal but we're not going to do much about it right so they legalized crime across a whole broad array of categories and then they took the people who were supposed to fight that crime and they literally turned them into to criminals because the lawfare against Trump in my opinion is purely criminal um the j6 um you know the the degree to which they were overcharged in my opinion is just purely criminal and they've canceled a lot of people for supporting Trump in the media and supporters and they've gone after his supporters are trying to take him down and if you put all this together it looks like a plan to destroy America it looks intentional now I usually avoid any kind of uh conspiracy theory that deep I try to because when you just look at a bunch of patterns it's easy to convince yourself that the patterns mean more than they do but holy hell that's a lot of pattern let me give you um yeah and apparently ice has known which means the administration is known they LED in 663 th000 people with criminal histories 13,000 were charged with were convicted of homicide convicted and they led him into the countryes 16,000 for sexual assaults and 1845 facing homicide charges now um speaking of Shuan Ryan in his podcast uh I'm going to ask you for a favor uh I watched a clip in which he had an author on just recently John Ryan did and I didn't catch the author's name or the name of his book so if you if you saw it and you probably did or maybe you could Google it for me could you put in the comments the name of the author once I tell you what the topic was you'll recognize it uh suddenly he gets his due credit because the author was very very convincing and here's a story that I heard from the author on Sean Ryan's podcast um and I'm interested if you've ever heard of this before so Obama wanted Dei and how it happened that it was everywhere in the country was somewhat clever and I'd never heard this before so you got a president who wants you know Dei to be a big thing and he worked with John Brennan and also with the various government entities and the idea was if you could get the government to push Dei and to really embrace it and also hire a lot of people for those agencies that are under the Dei umbrella that further will make Dei a big thing but here's the part I didn't realize before that if you make the government entities and agencies all Dei um Advocates they're going to force companies to be Dei because those companies need approvals and need you know need to work productively with entities within the government so all you have to do is get the government to push Dei and then the government will push you know each of the agencies and you know people who who have some control over individuals and companies can then push it themselves and apparently John Brenan has said it's one of his greatest accomplishments or the greatest accomplishment of his career was bringing Dei to the CIA when he was in charge of it and I believe that over 50% of the CIA now is women and that was part of his accomplishments he says so when I look at Dei which is literally illegal that is tearing the country apart and has created a system which guarantees incompetence not because of the individuals not because of anybody's genes or culture or chromosomes or DNA or anything like that that's a separate that's not in the conversation it's just that the pool of applicants to fulfill Dei is smallish and if you if you have to do it you're going to just hire less qualified people and what we should see under a Dei environment within one decade you should see every major institution crumble that would be the prediction that you could you could predict on paper and again not because of anybody's DNA not because of anybody's race or culture nothing to do with that it's just that if you force a constraint on a thing that's barely working in the first place which is you know the economy the the economy is always you know delicately between you know working great and failing there's always that small difference between huge economic success and well that didn't work and Dei is by far enough to move you from the great economic success to everything fell apart and we're not sure why just everything we tried to do didn't work you made a phone call to text support they couldn't help you you know basically nothing works so we are in that phase we are we are in the predictable stage of everything up because we have too many incompetent people in every organization and it was intentional now if you ask them they'd say we're trying to make you know the organizations look like America make sure everybody has opportunity I like all of that you know on paper I like it all it's just if the only way you can implement it is a bunch of managers saying I'm going to get fired unless I hire somebody who's a Dei person and even if I can't find a good one I'm GNA have to take a chance until everything falls apart and that's where we are everything's falling apart and honestly it's mostly Dei problem more than anything it's Dei now on top of that everything's more complicated every year so in theory that an average person who could do you know a reasonable job at something no longer can so the complexity of everything makes it so if you're not in the top 20% of capability you're not going to be able to do anything everything's just too hard you know back back when you know you just had to milk a cow oh almost everybody could do it all you had to do is shoot an animal and skin it well most people could do it with a little bit of practice but most people can't do most jobs now they're just too complicated anyway Frank luns says that uh the uh for the first time in a long time there are more people uh registered as Republicans than Democrats in the entire country did you see that coming I did not see that coming I I have to admit that one snuck up on me because you know what what it is about Republicans that really stands out and and I've always loved this about conservatives and Republicans they're really about just getting the work done they're not so much about making sure that everybody knows it so there's something about this number that says to me that Republicans just got to work and said we can't give up the country if there are more Democrats than there are Republicans we're all dead and so since the obvious solution to having more Democrats than Republicans is you register more Republicans they did now again Scott presler gets you know a huge bit of credit for what he did especially in Pennsylvania but there must be a lot more people working on this I I don't know is this the Lara Trump um part of the world I'm not sure if what she's doing is directly or indirectly related to this now some of this might be that the Democrats did such a bad job that people are hiding as Independents because I think that happens if if if Biden is just embarrassing people will say um I'm uh uh let's say I'm an independent yeah not my fault sure I voted for him but now I'm independent now I'm independent so some of it is fake people just hiding because they don't want to take the heat but it's never been this way before and it's not even that close there's 48% Republican and 45% Democrat now there's still so many um wait a minute this can't be right how's that no that's not right these numbers can't be right because that would mean that The Independents are no this can't be right I thought Independents were about a third of Voters am I wrong about that the last time I saw these numbers The Independents Democrats and Republicans were roughly about the same number and this would this would suggest that there are very few Independents so that can't be right all right I'm going to uh I'm going to Pivot my Pivot is there's something wrong with these numbers it could be that they're only comparing people who who are registered one way or the other which you know I would need more detail to know if that's what's happening but let's say that uh let's say the numbers are true what would that suggest would be the likely um vote if there really are more Republicans registered than Democrats who would win the not the electoral vote but the overall National vote should be the one who's got the most people registered because that's what it's been before you know whe there were more Democrats and sure enough they won the national vote even when they lost the uh you know the Electoral College so what would be the result hypothetically if these numbers held and let's say let's say um Independence we don't know this but let's say independence match to this these ratios I think Independence are going to be far more for Trump but let's say it's just this much that would suggest a landslide right if Trump wins the popular vote Nationwide the electoral vote is a landslide now I need somebody smart to tell me I'm wrong about that but I think I'm right so you've got the you've got the national polls which uh depending on how they wait things and how they ask the question and you know some assumptions that they make when they collect their data they look a little sketchy don't they now the national polls sometimes say Comm ahead sometimes by a lot sometimes they say Trump's ahead sometimes by a good amount so the national polls appear to be completely funky and unreliable at this moment but do you think that we can accurately count how many people have registered as Republicans versus Democrats yes because that doesn't require an assumption and it doesn't require any there there's not much room for weasel it's probably just a data that you're either registered or you're not so if you're going to believe one what would be more believable that the Republican registrations have surged which would indicate a landslide for Trump or that the uh individual polls which we've never trusted in the past and always seem to get mysteriously accurate right toward the election sort of in October do you do you know what the October surprise is yet one of them there's probably going to be lots of them have you figured out the October surprise well if this is true the Republican um registrations have now outnumbered Democrat registrations this election is over in terms of voting is you know I'm going to agree with Eric Weinstein that we don't know if Trump will become president because the the Bad actors looks like there's no limits to what they'd be willing to do and I mean actually no limits so I think Trump probably has a dominant position and it looks like a landslide if nothing changes but remember going to be lots of changes so here's what I think will be your October surprise now can't guarantee it can't guarantee it but the pollsters are all going to be showing a Landslide by election day because if they don't if they don't then next election you're going to say um there was a landslide and you weren't even close why should we listen to you again why should we pay you for your for your stuff why should we ever report what you said again so it becomes really important for the pollsters to end up in the top five top 10 so if they're way off a few weeks before election which is what October the October surprise is going to be the polls now you knew it was going to happen but here's the surprise it's going to be bigger than you thought I think the surprise is going to be the the degree of poller shenanigans that are happening in September are beyond what you imagined was possible that's that's what I think will be your surprise now I could be wrong right it'd be easy to be wrong about this but when you see the if you see the people on the streets um I just saw another person on the street thing they're asking just young people who they supported it seems to be Trump every time somebody goes on the street and even if maybe it was always you know close to half and half the Trump supporters who are young will say it out loud with no embarrassment whatsoever as if it's the cooler thing to do now and once you see how many 20-some people are are you know just yelling Trump into the the camera so happy to support him perfectly happy that that they're seen by their their other fellow students seen by whoever is going to see the video there's nothing holding it back Trump and I think I think it's because eating the dogs I think eating the dogs eating the cats is what made him popular with young people well plus you know the assassination attempt was you know remarkable you know the the fight fight fight part but the the cats and the dogs thing is still trending on Tik Tok and when you see people's reaction to him and you see the number of people who are still dancing to that something's happening something Big's happening all right of course you know the big news is Israel took out the head of Hezbollah with a gigantic set of bombs bunker Busters I guess yes so here's what happened see how impressed you are by this so uh Hezbollah has like reportedly I don't know 100,000 rockets that could be fired at Israel if they were to fire them all at the same time or in big waves then the Iron Dome would have a tough time getting them all just because of numbers so really the threat that hezel had was that will fire them in big waves at the same time it wasn't really a risk if they did you know one here or there the Iron Dome could get them and chances are it was wasn't going to hit anything anyway so what do you think it takes for hzb to fire all of their stuff at the same time well coordination obviously coordination and what does that take well some kind of communication and what does that take well you're going to have to use some kind of digital communication and apparently because they thought the cell phones could be too easily tracked by Israel they had moved to pagers and walkie-talkies which as you know Israel found a way to make explody so once all their pagers and walkie-talkies exploded what's next well the first thing that you might not realize is that they may have lost their ability to coordinate an attack CU if they don't do it all at the same time they're just wasting their missiles send up three missiles Israel knocks down three missiles and you're done so if you can't shoot them all at the same time you've lost your only weapon the you know the one that anybody's worried about so I can't say for sure that they lost that ability but they haven't launched a big wave of missiles and they did lose all of their leadership and the last guy that was left said to himself huh I'm going to have to figure out how to rebuild and get things coordinated again but I better not use any digital means so send out the runners and get the the I don't know the third level down of commanders because the other ones have all been killed and we'll we'll meet in my uh my command bunker yeah we're whatever's left of the leadership of Hezbollah after most of it's already been killed we're going to meet in my well-known command bunker my well-known well-identified command bunker knowing that there are obviously spies working because without the spies Israel would not have been able to kill all of the top guys Commander already wherever they were they got them all which very heavily suggests there's an Insider who's saying um he's in a blue car he's heading down the street now so the head of Hezbollah clearly not a strategic genius decided to get what was left of Hezbollah to meet him in person in his command bunker well what do you think happened then I'm not supposed to laugh at War but did this really happen did Israel really figure out a way to kill all the leaders and then make sure that the new team of leaders all went in the same place at the same time and that they would know where they were and when they were there and then they would drop a bunch of Bunker Busters on it and just make it a hole in the ground well there's nothing funny about this situation but Hezbollah had been telling a lot of lies and Israel decided to debunker him that's right they debunker him uh and when they were done uh the thing that used to be called a command bunker uh looked a lot like Justin Bieber's sphincter after a diddy party I I'll just let you live with that one for a while take your time take your time whenever you're done we'll get back to it okay yeah look like Justin Bieber's spincter spincter after a diddy party anyway uh we don't see them uh firing back a whole bunch of missiles uh Iran apparently had a big old meeting and Iran thinks some people are saying Iran is going to send some um somebody said Iran might send some troops to Lebanon I don't know if that's a good idea for them but uh it gets better apparently Israel hacked the airport control tower for uh for Lebanon Beirut I guess and uh since we know that Iran apparently was shipping in supplies and weapons to Hezbollah uh they got to the control tower took it over with hackers and told the planes they better turn around because they're in trouble if they land and and there's some evidence that one of the planes that was coming from Iran to Lebanon turned around immediately turned around immediately which means it was probably full of weapons don't know for sure but maybe well if any of this is true uh Israel basically just rewrote all the war books about how you do anything the the level of Brilliance that appears to be here now remember this is still fog of War propaganda you know we're we're getting a version of the news that says Israel is beyond brilliant so just just be careful that you're maybe not seeing all the warts you know maybe things weren't as clean and maybe there was some luck involved and so we don't know everything but if we were just to judge it on the surface it would be the greatest military strategic success of my life I mean the the amount that I am impressed by what Israel's done militarily and again I want to if somebody is new to me I don't back uh Israel because they don't back me it's not my job to back Israel now they're an ally and I take that seriously but I'm an American so I'm sitting over are carrying what's good for me you know Israel is just something I'm observing and sometimes I say to myself all right if that happened to America how would we act well we're full of Dei so we couldn't get we couldn't pull that off but I wish we could I wish we were that smart anyway um there's a uh there's a new drone South Korea made a drone that works on hydrogen it's a hydrogen drone Tech times says so this is it's got a 5,800 mile range and can stay in the air for hours compared to 30 minutes for a normal drone so if you've got something that can lift um some weight and can go 5,800 miles and stay in the air for hours the degree of warfare you can do with small drones because these would be smallish ones is a whole new level so um I don't know how close we are to an all robot war where it's just drones in the sky because you don't want to waste a pilot and um you know robot dogs on the ground we're pretty close we're pretty close we might actually get to the point where if the robots on one side defeat the robots on the other that the humans will Just Surrender rather than send humans to fight their robots which would just be Slaughter we'll just say all right you robots beat our robots we don't like it but you're in charge now you own our country we're getting there I think you'll see it in your lifetime um judge chuckin according to Jeff Clark she she's uh gaming with the uh the timing of things so that few weeks before the election there would be some kind of reveal from Jack Smith so Jack Smith the da he's got some materials that are we haven't seen But the redacted version might come out mid October now whatever a prosecutor of trump produces in mid October is going to be bad for Trump now do you think it's a huge coincidence that the Badness would come out at the very worst time do we expect that whatever Badness he produces is real like actually in context and accurate nope I do not believe that I believe that they would because remember Department of Justice are criminals and the criminals are now legal so this would be the Department of Justice now they're criminals um so the criminal thing to do would be to make up a bunch of and know that there's no time to correct it before the election and and just depend on the uh the fake news to say it's all true and then after the election you do the fact check it's like oh oh yeah I guess I guess this wasn't as true as we thought sorry about that yeah yeah sorry that's what it looks like well one of my favorite things yesterday was that Trump and zinski met now that's unusual because Trump is not the sitting president so that you you have to be delicate about what you can and cannot do in that situation but I loved the press conference after where Trump his 6'3 is standing over zinski is 56 or whatever he is and zalinski just looked like he' just been punished by his parents like he looked like a defeated he didn't look like zalinsky of old give us weapons we'll fight every day we win and and Trump is just saying what was Trump saying he was saying uh basically it's over we need to negotiate a deal you know we'll just figure out who gets what land we'll sort it out now that's when zalinski in the past would have said something like no we will fight we must get every inch of land back we will never quit they can't steal our land the best he could do because he knows there's a good chance he's going to be dealing with Trump in the future the best he could do is remind us that Russia is on Ukrainian land and so when they negotiate you know that should be top of mind but even he was talking about negotiating now correct me if I'm wrong so now zalinsky seems on board with negotiating and obviously some kind of land agreement will have to happen Putin of course is interested in negotiating and they're the two sides who's not interested in negotiating Democrats and the Deep State and the military-industrial complex but if you put Trump in there there's nobody left who wants the war zalinsky doesn't really want any more of it you know he love to win but doesn't seem to be an option so forget about that yeah all it takes is a president Trump now when he'd been saying he could get it done in a day you know that's hyperbole nobody could do it in a day but basically he could because all it takes is Trump to be president and then there's nobody in the game who wants to keep fighting because Ukraine and Russia definitely don't they definitely don't and as long as Trump doesn't there's nobody left so yes he could wind it up soon as he gets in there I I wonder if Trump actually worried that he could end the war before he got in office and before there's even an election so that it wouldn't count in his benefit on the election but if you want to end this war you now have a 100% obvious way to do it that you control as a citizen you can just vote for Trump and this war is over it really is all right Bill Maher had a show last night we always talk about him he is you know I know it bothers some people that bill Mah is always at discussion the next day because blah blah blah um but he is a a good indicator of what people are thinking and on that basis it's fascinating and uh he actually said that uh we should defend Ukraine um and that it's basically so little money for the United States that we're you getting some benefit of degrading Russia we're protecting our Ally kind of an ally um and and this is what Mars says about the money uh he says that basically none of us know that none of us can tell the difference the amount of money we spent in Ukraine he's saying that you you and I don't feel it to which I say have you heard of inflation now I don't know how much of the um let's see if our if our deficit per year is in the over a trillion dollar range is it like 1.3 trillion somewhere in that range and how much do we give to um Ukraine every year a few hundred billion do we spend a few hundred billion per year so maybe 15% of our deficit something like that and then of course we have to build up our own military because you know we're we're spending sending our bullets over there so we got to buy our own bullets or something so um he is correct that we cannot identify the difference in our life from the Ukraine expenses I can't identify okay how much of my inflation was because that war might be 10% but it's also not ending and the amount we're spending isn't really the total issue it's about whether we should be having a war with a nuclear power and what are we getting from it and is it worth 200 billion and if we've got 200 billion extra to spend on anything is that where you want it to go because 200 billion is real money um anyway so far the it's been 10 billion here 7 billion in there I don't know what it adds up to and um all right V ramaswami says that uh musk is super hardcore about firing federal employees working with Trump and I saw this on the George account good account to follow on X George H he's Ras Swami said it looks like Elon will use OIC on the government's fat and here's a quote elon's pretty hardcore and V says I said 75% of the federal bureaucrats he said you need to put at least 75 so Elon musk's correction to V who wanted to get rid of 75% of the bureaucrats was you should say at least how much do you love that how much do you love that that if you could imagine that you could ever get rid of 75% of the de the bureaucrats um that you should really be saying more I I just love that I don't know that they can get rid of more than 75% but the fact that he's not going to be limited by your 75% estimate I love that it's at least 75% anyway um according to the Gateway pundit Antonio Gro writer he's got an argument in there opinion piece that liberal policies are driving up our obesity rates now up to 40% of the adults or is it everybody uh 40% are obese I don't know if that's 40% of oh yeah it is adults and 20% of children now when I saw that opinion I said to myself I don't know if I want to read this because I don't think he's going to convince me that liberal policies are making people fat because I said to myself how how how are liberal policies making anybody fat explain that and he talked about how school gym classes are cutting way back so kids are less active in school and I said H Public Schools okay Democrats pretty much have a lock on everything that happens in the public school so yeah I guess okay yeah less physical activity sure uh then there's fat acceptance the idea that Democrats are pushing the idea that you don't need to lose weight you're perfectly healthy nobody should judge you and while I agree with the notion that I don't like fat shaming there's no question that the public attitude toward toward it has an impact on how people act right if people say you're fine you can be any weight you want there's going to be more people overweight if if the public says cruy cruy don't be like that there's probably going to be less of it people are going to try harder now there might also be some uh food related uh illnesses but that's a separate question I'm talking about anorexia for example um there are food deserts now in a lot of poor areas because uh the crime was so high that uh places that would sell you healthier food like a grocery store just said oh we're out here's there's still Mc.

Donald's so good luck that feels fair and then of course the pandemic and the lockdown had some lasting effects so I'm not sure uh you know how much of the Obesity is because of liberal policies but I do think that Antonio made his case he made his case it it's just we can't tell what percentage of the whole problem is caused by that but it's not making it better anyway there's now jets that are going to be able to do automatic takeoffs and landings according to CNN um and if he didn't know this and this is weird uh the more advanced planes could already land in bad weather and stuff um on instruments well it could it could land autonomously so even if the pilot dropped dead the advanced planes could just land and and the landing some say they the machine would do it better than the pilot pilot can make a human error the machines much less likely but what I didn't know is that the um the planes were not equipped to take off with an a pilot which seems weird it seems like taking off would be easier than Landing but taking off is actually harder I mean where it can be so it's actually a big deal that airplanes are learning to take off on their own at the same time that uh Robo taxis are coming on so the idea of having a human sitting behind a steering wheel for anything it will be largely defunct except for recreational stuff like I don't know maybe your fishing boat or something anyway and that ladies and gentlemen is all I wanted to say that's worth saying today uh we'll keep an eye on whatever is happening with Hezbollah and Israel but uh as I've said before if Israel's going to get tough with its its enemies and neighbors there's never been a better time in history to do it because first of all it seems like they have you know good handle on the the military strategy obviously but also there's no leadership in the United States so if they can get themselves a little bit pregnant you know make sure that they're well into a war against Hezbollah or ran or whoever they decide to go to war with um if they do it now Trump won't be B to stop him because he's not president and Biden's barely a president and Harris is out in the road so if you were going to make a big move um and you're Israel it's going to happen now so I would expect maximum chaos um but there's also a possibility that Israel will have a surprisingly fast and good result in Lebanon because a lot of the Lebanese I'm hearing are not so pro- esbah so if Israel could find a way to be um let's say accurate enough to take out Hezbollah without killing much in the way of innocent Lebanese people who don't like Les hezb either they might be able to find a workable situation there maybe imagine how different that would be if Lebanon were no longer an enemy of Israel or at least parts of it so Hezbollah being Bad actors and Hamas Being Bad actors maybe something can change we'll see all right ladies and gentlemen that's all I have for you I'm going to talk to the local subscribers privately because of their awesomeness but uh I'll see the rest of you on You.

Tube and Rumble and X tomorrow same time same place bye for now we've got 30 seconds to sip e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e

oh my god I've got this little itch

right in the back of

my back of my shoulders where I can't

reach this is why you need the

telescoping bag scratcher you should

have one everywhere because there's this

one little area I can't reach back there

oh my god oh oh my god oh so

good all

right well if you didn't notice the

dilber comic is uh up it's the reborn

comic now normally Dilbert well not

normally the the Dilbert comic and the

Dilbert reborn comic

typically um they don't do any

politics so this isn't really politics

it's just dog bir picking up on a

meme but I thought you'd like it let me

read it to you in case you're listening

dogbe says to Dilbert they're just

sitting around the breakfast table and

dilber says I'm sorry doger says when

the Hunter's bullet grazed my ear I

dropped to the ground out of instinct

then I jumped up and looked at the pack

of wolves I had come to lead and yelled

bite bite bite and he's raising his fist

like Trump did your story and then dber

says your story is inspiring but

derivative and dogar says I didn't want

to reinvent the wheel I mean stick with

what works right people stick with what

works anyway that's available

only um on the

yeah you have to subscribe to see dber

reborn either on uh the locals platform

Scott adams. locals.com

or or where's the show I'm trying to

open it here it

is

huh

um or you can see it on uh the X uh the

xplatform if you

subscribe oh by the way the 2025 dilber

calendar is available for pre-sale the

desk page a day desk calendar made in

America for the first time and it's at

uh if you go to dilbert.com you'll see

the link for a pre-sale it's the only

place you can get it it's not going to

be on Amazon not now orever and it won't

be in bookstores only one link it's the

only way you can get it made in

America good morning everybody and

welcome to coffee with Scott Adams the

greatest experience of your life if

you'd like to take this up to levels

that nobody can really understand with

their tiny shiny human brains all you

need for

that

is a cuper muger glass a tanker shell s

a canteen juger flask of vess of any

kind fill it with your favorite liquid I

like coffee and join me now for the

unparallel pleasure the dope mean the

end of the day the thing that makes

everything better it's called the

simultaneous hip and it happens now

go the

best I wonder if the coffee is making me

healthier well there's a new study that

that's discussed in brink Zone that

coffee increases your testosterone and

your Anor robic power that's right a

little bit of coffee and you'll be

stronger and have more testosterone you

want me to prove it watch this

[Music]

all right this is really good fabric on

this t-shirt and I didn't want to hurt

it anyway but trust me I could have if I

tried a little

harder well here's the kind of stories I

see every day um lately so the Michigan

mailin ballots are now only going to be

counted if there's a proof of signature

this is a gateway bundit reporting this

to which I said to myself wait a minute

are you telling me that in the past the

Michigan mail and ballots didn't need

any signature

verification the most basic thing you

would do no no and wait a minute wait a

minute are you telling me that they're

only just barely fixing this in time for

the

election that's right just a few weeks

before the actual

election but thank goodness

thank goodness there's no other

irregularity to report about the

election well Jim Jordan has accused the

Department of Homeland Security

Secretary of uh stonewalling the Ohio

election Integrity according to a raw

story so Jim Jordan says the homeland

security is refusing to respond to

requests from Ohio's top election

official for federal citizenship

verification records I guess they want

to make sure that the people who are

voting are citizens but the Department

of Homeland Security is stonewalling

them do you know how many stories I see

every day almost all of them on X about

something that is clearly broken in our

election system and somebody's trying to

fix it now sometimes successfully

sometimes they get

stonewalled but if we have a pristine

election system

that we are quite all sure has been

perfect why are so many things getting

fixed are do people who we elect in

various states are are they so dumb that

they don't know the elections are

perfect the way they are and they think

they're fixing something that ain't

broke or is it stuff that's really

obviously broken and was obviously

broken before and yet the new news that

you thought was real told you well we

know those elections were good yeah you

can know what you don't know that's what

the news told you here here's a list of

things that can't be known that we know

but wait you that can't be known yeah

but we know it right but there isn't any

way to know it but we know it well how

do you know it well we didn't look into

it no not looking into it is not how you

know things well well there were no

complaints that we saw but you just said

you didn't look into it that's

right so if you don't look into it you

can be sure what happened

exactly and that's actually what the

news has been telling us for

years and people just s at home going

uhhuh uhhuh didn't look into it must be

a good

election I I can I can think of no

better evidence of a good election then

we didn't really look into it oh oh by

the way it's designed so you can't fully

audit

it yeah just normal stuff nothing to be

concerned

about how many Democrats will hear

either of those stories today how many

Democrats are going to hear about

Michigan not checking signatures in the

past oh my God or or that uh we're not

entirely sure who are citizens and

should be able to vote do you think any

Democrats will hear that no no it'll be

basically

zero um let's see what does the public

think about election Integrity well it

used to be that uh Republicans were

confident in the system and Democrats

thought it might be a little sketchy but

according to Gallup that is somewhat

reversed and now the Republicans think

the elections are more sketchy than the

Democrats but both sides think they're a

little bit of sketchy

so

57% of those ped by Gallup uh said that

they will be um only somewhat confident

in the accuracy of the election where

24% say they're not too confident and a

whopping 19% say they're not confident

at all I would have added those two

together but only 57% of the public

thinks they're very or even somewhat

confident in the results does that sound

about right to you

does that sound like a system that's

been designed to make us confident that

we know what

happened no I don't think you can get to

only

57% think the election is

fair and and

reliable unless it's designed to keep

you from knowing who won our elections

let me say it again are very obviously

very obviously designed so you don't

know who

one I think that's the only thing you

need to know if you spent a few minutes

looking at the design of the system and

then I said to you all right would you

know if the post office threw away some

ballots no you would how would you know

that how would you catch that in an

audit there's no way to catch that no

it's uncatchable uh if I told you that a

state actor whether it's the CIA or some

other country had worked with an Insider

at one of the voting machines or

tabulator companies and had hacked it

with the help of an Insider to cover up

any Trail would you be able to spot that

no no you wouldn't no there's no way you

could catch that what would be the most

obvious way that anybody would cheat

well one of those Ways How about if um

somebody was a

non-citizen and yet they had a they got

a mail in vote and then they

voted what part of the process checks

all those names against Real

voters well maybe some states do but not

all of

them so the most obvious ways that

anybody would think of you know if you

were going to think of a way to cheat

none of them are checkable the most

obvious ways you would cheat and so to

imagine that you could

know who won an election is is sort of

just

naive yeah but there we

are so you then did a fact check on KL

Harris's claims about manufacturing jobs

so she said something about um Trump

being bad and losing manufacturing jobs

and Biden being good and getting them

back but apparently he was just

wildly you know incorrect just a lie

basically but CNN fact checked them now

here's my question

have you noticed the selectivity of

CNN's fact

checking how many how many votes do you

think got changed because somebody

exaggerated or had a wrong data about

manufacturing none

none no e even if the Democrats heard

that this was a fake claim and it was a

lie there's probably not even one

Democrat who's going to changed their

vote because somebody exaggerated or you

know said something about manufacturing

jobs you've got two candidates who both

say they want to bring manufacturing

back to the us both of them are going to

use hyperbole about their numbers both

of them are going to choose a a period

of time that makes their thing look good

both of them are going to pad

things it has no effect on the actual

outcome of the vote now you know it

would if they fact checked the hoaxes if

they fact checked all the hoaxes every

time she used one that would affect the

election because nobody nobody thinks

that an ordinary lie told by a

politician is you know different or even

noteworthy or nobody cares it's just

part of the process but if you told if

you told the CNN and msnb view Ms MSNBC

viewers that their entire worldview was

created by a a a mesh network of hoaxes

that the media

creates that would change some votes

because we sought that a number of the

people who said I've been a lifetime

Democrat but I changed my vote the

number one thing they point out is

what's the number one thing that people

mention when they say they changed to

give up the

Democrats the fine people hoax the fine

people hoax is the T pole hoax

meaning it's the one that keeps all the

other hoaxes alive if you believed the

fine people hoax then you accepted as a

given that Trump was the worst person in

the world and would say any crazy

thing now since the find people hoax is

not true then suddenly all the other

hoaxes once you learn it's not true and

how they did it and how and how

blatantly it was done I think the thing

about the fine people hoax is that you

didn't have to really do research to to

find out it was a lie and that the

entire left-leaning media landscaped

were all in on it they all knew the

truth because they had the video too so

that one's a real you know that that one

just makes your brain go wait a minute

what how badly were they lying to me

because it's one thing when a candidate

tells a lie like I said you just expect

that but when the entire media landscape

coordinates with the Democrats to tell

you a lie like to fine people

hoax that can change your

mind when you find out that you were a

victim of that and then that there are

20 more just like it there are 20 more

the fine people hoax was just the T pole

you still needed other you know polls to

to hold things up but the main 10 pole

was that one and I I'd like to say that

I'm happy that I worked for seven years

to De bunka you know Cortez Joel poock

uh we all worked like the three of us

just like work like maniacs for three

years every time that popped up to make

sure that people saw the counter you

know the

debunk anyway haris goes to the Border

uh which gives I don't think anybody's

having more fun in the last few months

than Scott Jennings who is uh I guess he

would represent the Republican opinion

on CNN now I'd like to give CNN a a

little bit of credit so I think it's

it's prudent to call balls and Strikes

and not just be you know in the bag for

one team completely so the fact that uh

Scott Jennings is not only very

effective in his Communications on

behalf of Republicans but he does get a

lot of screen time he gets a lot of

screen time he shows up in clips and um

he's doing a hell of a job if if you

haven't watched any of Scott Jennings

debunking of the CNN people while they

watch you have to watch it not just for

what he says because he he does a great

job of framing things but you have to

watch the faces of the panelists when

they're forced to listen to the truth on

CNN because they all know they're

Liars they're they're completely aware

of what they're doing so when they give

him time and they let him talk you just

have to I've I reposted a few an acts if

you want to see them you just have to

see the faces while they listen they

they try to do the the smug smile but

the smile says I know you got us it's

sort of

a you know I'm I'm doing an impression

now if you're hearing only audio it's

that the smug

smile it's toothless so a real smile

shows your teeth usually here's a real

smile see here's a real smile it's all

teethy here here's a smile that says

Scott Jennings is making

you look like you have a brain the size

of a squirrel and a million people are

watching him do it while your face is on

the

screen yeah see that that's the face

when you're being Dunked On by Scott

Jennings on

CNN M I'm happy I'm happy but not happy

enough so you can see my

teeth I'm so happy look at my smile I'm

not even bothered by it at all I'm not

even bothered by being called out as a

ridiculous

propagandist right in front of the

world look at me smiling it's not

bothering me a

bit so that's hilarious I recommend

it here's what Scott Jenning

said uh when Harris went to the Border

he said arsonist returns to scene of

crime I told you he's going to reframing

arsonist returns to scene of crime and

we're

done I I could continue talking about

this topic of KL Harris visiting the

Border but everything I say is just

going to fit under this one reframe

arsonist returns to scene of crime do I

need to tell anybody that the Biden

Administration is 100% responsible for

everything we say or that she was the

borders are or if you don't like using

common words for stuff just just in

control of things at the Border in some

general way that never happened three

and a half years of complete absolute

failure to the point where it looks like

intentional treason we don't know that

it is but sure looks like it You Can't

Fail Harder than she has failed and

Biden has failed at the border You Can't

Fail Harder than that and she returns to

the scene of the crime like an

arsonist

anyway and uh Scott Jennings points out

there was a huge Tactical mistake to

just make sure that people were really

paying attention to the

Border while Harris tells you it's a

giant

problem while you

say but you caused the problem why are

you now acting like you don't know what

caused it and why why are you there you

should be hiding in shame for what

you've done and the fact that she went

to the border and simply made the Border

issue more prominent in the

news yeah that's What mattered what

didn't matter were her clever little

arguments and stuff about it no nobody

cares about that all they care about is

we spent more time thinking about

criminals coming across the border now

as luck would have it the the ice report

came out at the same time saying that

the number of criminals literally

murderers and rapists were in the tens

of

thousands the ones we know about

imagine how many people that maybe

murdered somebody and got away with it

and still came here so at the same time

the public is being exposed we hope

maybe no Democrats ever saw that data

but it was national news at least on the

right and I think Scott Jennings

mentioned these numbers too so he he

penetrated the CNN audience with that so

at the same time we're seeing massive

unreported until now numbers of

criminals that we have deliberately

deliberately led into the country at the

same time we're seeing reports that

Isis Isis is sneaking people into the

country at the same time we're hearing

that maybe I don't know Hezbollah or

some other damn thing is coming in with

shoulder-mounted missiles and there's a

bunch of assassin teams coming through

the border and there there are tens of

thousands of Chinese military looking

people coming through the

Border we let everybody in it's the

biggest failure in American

politics yeah let me say that let me say

that with a little bit of

confidence in the history of American

government opening the border the way it

was

done is the biggest mistake in American

history if you could come up with a

better example of a bigger

mistake I don't know now and the thing

is we haven't seen the uh

the price of that yet the price is yet

to be paid because we're letting in a

whole bunch of terrorists at the same

time Iran is going to go to war with

Israel maybe we'll talk about that and

what would Iran do what have we've been

warned by the people who know how things

work in this world what is Iran going to

do if let's say Iran itself is attacked

as opposed to its proxies they're going

to attack inside the United States your

lights are going to go off because Iran

is not you know a me too follower kind

of a country they have abilities they

got skills and they're probably already

in our cyber you they probably have

already penetrated some of our systems

they almost certainly have agents with

weapons in the United States not that

they're necessarily going to do an

October 7th

attack but they could certainly do

things that we weren't sure if it was

them or somebody else

so it is in my opinion the biggest

blunder in all of American government

history I don't think there's a second

place to

that and I guess what's different about

it is that it was obvious it was a

blunder before they did it I mean it

looks so much like somebody was trying

to destroy the country it doesn't even

look like this was ever a serious thing

that somebody thought was a good idea it

simply looks like somebody had a plan to

destroy the country I'll talk more about

that speaking of

which Harris uh looked at the Trump

border wall so she had to stand in front

of the border wall that Trump built

which at one point in 2019 she'd call

that medieval vanity project and now

she's all about building some more how

do the Democrats not notice what's going

on but they don't they don't seem to

notice

anyway

um former Navy SEAL Shan Ryan who's got

a podcast he was on Joe Rogan and he

said the Taliban is funneling terrorist

into the US to the southern border for

some kind of October 7th style attack

now I don't think Iran would want to do

an October 7th in the United

States but Isis

might Isis might

so that's all coming in and at the same

time Harris is called for a pathway to

citizenship for millions of uh of the

migrants she led into the

country I don't know how you could be

worse to to create the biggest blunder

in American history and then to top it

by saying let's let's give them

citizenship so they can also

vote the level of incompetence is Way

Beyond anything I could call accidental

it doesn't look

accidental nobody could be this dumb I

mean nobody could

really um so she gives a speech after

she went to the border and uh I I would

like to say as far as I could tell when

she gave her speech she was not

inebriated and I thought she did a great

job so it was a teleprompter speech at

first I thought maybe it was impromptu

and I was more impressed but then when

looked that oh it's teleprompter but the

teleprompter she does really well now so

I guess she's been doing a lot of

practice on the campaign Trail but man

she she read that

teleprompter uh she did not cackle she

had all the right motions and

everything but I did note a few

problems oh number one uh if you'd like

to know when she's inebriated and when

she's not there's a tell that is

guaranteed

right now I think you can tell by just

the way she talks and and everything but

there's one tell for whether she's

inebriated and she definitely wasn't she

was in full control and did a good job

in Her speech here's here's her hand

gestures when she's not inebriated

they're crisp and they're smallish so so

she'd be like dupe dupe crisp tight

controlled so when she's talking her

hands are very much part of a good uh

presenter's hands now I'm going to give

you the impression of when she's

inebriated shoulders moving and hands

are not tight they're all over the

place let me tell you what we're going

to

do right that you you watch for it tight

your hands D Dent Dent versus loose ants

if you wonder if she's sometimes

inebriated in public you only have to

watch your speech where she's

not once you see her operating at

100% as she was during her

speech there's no doubt that the other

thing is

inebriated there's no doubt at all and

you can even see that she's picking her

spots when she does a national speech or

a debate definitely not

inebriated not not a s

not a suggestion not a hint nothing but

when she's talking to a

friendly a friendly like a students or a

little group of people who love her

she's drunk as a

we we've seen it so many times

there's no doubt about it or inebriated

in some

fashion the other thing I haven't heard

anybody say yet but uh let me be the

first to point it out so she gives a

speech that was largely about her you

know getting serious about the Border

did anybody notice that the speech was

all about

her here's what I expect when you've got

a massive border problem and somebody's

running for president here's what I'm

going to do about the Border I'm going

to build a wall I'm going to reverse the

executive orders I'm going to get rid of

this fake Asylum thing so that's what

you would say if you came there to tell

people how you're going to fix something

but she's got a little problem because

any of those ideas if they sound good

somebody's going to say so why didn't

you do that already Joe Biden says

you're in charge of

everything so she can't really come out

and say Here's a bunch of stuff I'm

going to do the only thing she said

specifically she's going to she wants to

create a path to

citizenship which is making the problem

better or worse

worse the only concrete suggestion is

something that whether you're on the

left or the right you'd say well that's

creating an incentive to come here

that's that's

worse that's not better that's

worse but here's the here's the part

that once you hear it if you listen to

it again listen for this she only talked

about

herself the only time she talked about

somebody else she talked about the poor

migrants the

non-citizens what she didn't talk about

is the the pain and destruction so much

that's coming on the American citizens

so here's her talking about the Border I

was a prosecutor okay we're not hiring

you to be a prosecutor I have toured the

tunnels okay I mean we all know there

tunnels does that make you a little

extra qualified because you've been in

one you wouldn't believe

how smooth the walls are of the tunnels

under the

Border okay well you know maybe it could

be true that Trump is not aware how

smooth the walls are on the tunnels

under the Border that's not much of a

selling point for you well Trump doesn't

even know how smooth the walls are it's

not like he's in favor of the the

tunnels so she had she just went on

forever the entire time I listened I

didn't hear it all

but the entire time I did listen she

only talked about herself and none of it

was relevant your prosecutor got it so

because you're a

prosecutor and your your entity

prosecuted some people in this context

what do you know that I don't know do do

I not know that fenel is coming across

the border and probably killed my

stepson everybody knows that do you not

know the cartels are in charge at the

border do you not know that millions of

people will come what is it we don't

know that we're now educated because we

know you were once a prosecutor and that

the walls of the tunnels were

shiny you got nothing you got nothing

lady meanwhile the border patrol said

yet another lie as with all things

border related she she was nowhere to be

found when we needed her she ignored the

Border problems until she that she

created over three years and admitted

that the uh and separately admitted that

the immigration system under her and

Biden was

broken so she said she was going to fix

the problem but isn't that really

admitting that she's the source of the

problem too because it didn't happen

under Trump he had it

fixed well the amuse account on

X says that comml Harris did some

election interference by creating some

campaign ads in which they had two

people saying that they used to be Trump

supporters but now they were in

Pennsylvania and now they're not well it

turns out that was fake they were not

real voters well they might vote but

there were actors who have always been

lifelong Democrats so they got two

lifelong Democrat actors to pretend that

they switched here's my question for you

how hard would it be for Trump to find

some prominent Democrats who switched to

him well not too hard RFK Jr Elon Musk

Scott Adams

Sachs there's pretty Amman there's

pretty long list doy you know there's a

long list he wouldn't have he wouldn't

have to hire an

actor Trump would not have to hire an

actor to say I used to be Democrat but

now I can't I can't just can't do it

anymore but she had to hire actors they

couldn't find any real

people I should tell you

something all right so here's my summary

for today I mean I'm not ending but this

this will capture my thoughts um I think

it's kind of stunning the degree to

which Democrats have legalized crime

while turning the Department of Justice

who should be fighting the crime into

the

criminals in other words lawfare Etc so

let me let me just give you some

examples so here's examples of of uh

Democrats who are basically legalizing

crime now that's a little hyperbole when

I say legalizing crime but I'll give you

the examples and you'll you'll see why

the hyperbole FS uh they wanted to

defund the police they wanted to stop uh

and they stop arresting shoplifters up

to a certain dollar Mount which caused

you know stores to close and massive

crime they're letting the homeless

control the sidewalks with everything

that brings with it they're creating an

asylum path for migrants who are willing

to lie the migrant process is is a legal

process but not if you lie if you lie

and say that you're coming for Asylum

but you're really not coming for Asylum

they have legalized that crime they've

essentially made it legal to lie that

you're here for Asylum because nobody's

going to get punished for it and it's

the obvious way to go if you're coming

in they created The Sanctuary cities to

thwart any legal processes about the uh

the immigrants uh lie about the amount

of uh crime incoming so they lied about

how much crime is coming across the

border they allowed teams of Assassins

and terrorists into the country um they

are pushing Dei which is literally

legalized discrimination against white

people white

males that's illegal um they censor

Americans via proxy

this is the Mike Ben's stuff um where we

know that the state department and the

Democrats get European and other

entities Brazilian to do the things that

they couldn't legally do to Citizens so

they just use external entities to put

the pressure on you know X and other

platforms Etc um so there're censoring

that's you know they want to take your

guns away of course there's a the

rhetoric in bages and assassinations in

my

opinion they've got elections that can't

be fully audited which supports criminal

acts during the elections and in

Manhattan apparently 60% of felonies are

reduced to misdemeanors so that's Alvin

brag

60% of

felonies are reduced to misdemeanors now

some are always I mean it's that's not

the first time that's ever happened but

60% feels like a lot to me

um and the Lesser charges are just

released all right so that's a case of

the

Democrats making effectively legal not

technically legal in every case but

effectively legalizing crime across a

whole broad range of important topics

what did that do it made the entire

country unsafe and inner cities extra

extra unsafe but at the same time that

they were making criminals

legal they were making the people whose

job it is to fight crime they turned

them into

criminals so they turn the criminals

into legal things like oh yeah you could

just just say Asylum and you could come

in ah you could take up to

$950 still technically illegal but we're

not going to do much about it right so

they legalized crime across a whole

broad array of categories and then they

took the people who were supposed to

fight that crime and they literally

turned them into to criminals because

the lawfare against Trump in my opinion

is purely criminal um the

j6 um you know the the degree to which

they were overcharged in my opinion is

just purely criminal and they've

canceled a lot of people for supporting

Trump in the media and supporters and

they've gone after his supporters are

trying to take him down and if you put

all this

together it looks like a plan to destroy

America

it looks

intentional now I usually avoid any kind

of uh conspiracy theory that deep I try

to because when you just look at a bunch

of patterns it's easy to convince

yourself that the patterns mean more

than they do but holy hell that's a lot

of

pattern let me give you

um yeah and apparently ice has known

which means the administration is known

they LED in 663 th000 people with

criminal histories 13,000 were charged

with were convicted of homicide

convicted and they led him into the

countryes 16,000 for sexual assaults and

1845 facing homicide

charges now um speaking of Shuan Ryan in

his podcast uh I'm going to ask you for

a favor uh I watched a clip in which he

had an author on just recently John Ryan

did and I didn't catch the author's name

or the name of his book so if you if you

saw it and you probably did or maybe you

could Google it for me could you put in

the comments the name of the author once

I tell you what the topic was you'll

recognize it uh suddenly he gets his due

credit because the author was very very

convincing and here's a story that I

heard from the author on Sean Ryan's

podcast um and I'm interested if you've

ever heard of this before so

Obama wanted

Dei and how it happened that it was

everywhere in the country was somewhat

clever and I'd never heard this before

so you got a president who wants you

know Dei to be a big thing and he worked

with John

Brennan and also with the various

government entities and the idea was if

you could get the government to push Dei

and to really embrace it and also hire a

lot of people for those agencies that

are under the Dei umbrella that further

will make Dei a big thing but here's the

part I didn't realize before that if you

make the government entities and

agencies all Dei um Advocates they're

going to force companies to be Dei

because those companies need approvals

and need you know need to work

productively with entities within the

government so all you have to do is get

the government to push Dei and then the

government will push you know each of

the agencies and you know people who who

have some control over individuals and

companies can then push it themselves

and apparently John Brenan has said it's

one of his greatest accomplishments or

the greatest accomplishment of his

career was bringing Dei to the CIA when

he was in charge of it and I believe

that over 50% of the CIA now is women

and that was part of his accomplishments

he says

so when I look at

Dei which is literally

illegal that is tearing the country

apart and has created a system which

guarantees incompetence not because of

the

individuals not because of anybody's

genes or culture or chromosomes or DNA

or anything like that that's a separate

that's not in the conversation it's just

that the pool of applicants to fulfill

Dei is smallish and if you if you have

to do it you're going to just hire less

qualified people and what we should see

under a

Dei

environment within one decade you should

see every major institution

crumble that would be the prediction

that you could you could predict on

paper and again not because of anybody's

DNA not because of anybody's race or

culture

nothing to do with that it's just that

if you force a constraint on a thing

that's barely working in the first place

which is you know the economy the the

economy is always you know

delicately between you know working

great and failing there's always that

small difference between huge economic

success and well that didn't work and

Dei is by far enough to move you from

the great economic success to everything

fell apart and we're not sure why just

everything we tried to do didn't work

you made a phone call to text support

they couldn't help you you know

basically nothing works so we are in

that phase we are we are in the

predictable stage of everything

up because we have too many incompetent

people in every

organization and it was

intentional now if you ask them they'd

say we're trying to make you know the

organizations look like America make

sure everybody has opportunity I like

all of that you know on paper I like it

all it's just if the only way you can

implement it is a bunch of managers

saying I'm going to get fired unless I

hire somebody who's a Dei person and

even if I can't find a good one I'm GNA

have to take a chance until everything

falls apart and that's where we are

everything's falling apart and honestly

it's mostly Dei problem more than

anything it's Dei now on top of that

everything's more complicated every year

so in theory that an average person who

could do you know a reasonable job at

something no longer can so the

complexity of everything makes it so if

you're not in the top 20% of capability

you're not going to be able to do

anything everything's just too hard you

know back back when you know you just

had to milk a cow oh almost everybody

could do it all you had to do is shoot

an animal and skin it well most people

could do it with a little bit of

practice but most people can't do most

jobs now they're just too

complicated anyway Frank luns says that

uh the uh for the first time in a long

time there are more people uh registered

as Republicans than Democrats in the

entire

country did you see that

coming I did not see that

coming I I have to admit that one snuck

up on me because you know what what it

is about Republicans that really stands

out and and I've always loved this about

conservatives and

Republicans they're really about just

getting the work

done they're not so much about making

sure that everybody knows

it so there's something about this

number that says to me that

Republicans just got to work and said we

can't give up the country if there are

more Democrats than there are

Republicans we're all

dead and so since the obvious solution

to having more Democrats than

Republicans is you register more

Republicans they did now again Scott

presler gets you know a huge bit of

credit for what he did especially in

Pennsylvania but there must be a lot

more people working on this I I don't

know is this the Lara Trump

um part of the world I'm not sure if

what she's doing is directly or

indirectly related to this now some of

this might be that the Democrats did

such a bad job that people are hiding as

Independents because I think that

happens if if if Biden is just

embarrassing people will say um I'm uh

uh let's say I'm an

independent yeah not my fault sure I

voted for him but now I'm independent

now I'm independent

so some of it is fake people just hiding

because they don't want to take the heat

but it's never been this way before and

it's not even that close there's 48%

Republican and 45% Democrat now there's

still so

many um wait a minute this can't be

right how's that no that's not right

these numbers can't be right because

that would mean that The Independents

are no this can't be right I thought

Independents were about a third of

Voters am I wrong about

that the last time I saw these numbers

The Independents Democrats and

Republicans were roughly about the same

number and this would this would suggest

that there are very few Independents so

that can't be right all right I'm going

to uh I'm going to Pivot my Pivot is

there's something wrong with these

numbers it could be that they're only

comparing people who who are registered

one way or the

other which you know I would need more

detail to know if that's what's

happening but let's say that uh let's

say the numbers are

true what would that suggest would be

the likely um

vote if there really are more

Republicans registered than Democrats

who would win the not the electoral vote

but the overall National vote should be

the one who's got the most people

registered because that's what it's been

before you know whe there were more

Democrats and sure enough they won the

national vote even when they lost the uh

you know the Electoral College so what

would be the result hypothetically if

these numbers held and let's say let's

say um Independence we don't know this

but let's say independence match to this

these

ratios I think Independence are going to

be far more for Trump but let's say it's

just this

much that would suggest a

landslide right if Trump wins the

popular vote

Nationwide the electoral vote is a

landslide now I need somebody smart to

tell me I'm wrong about that but I think

I'm right

so you've got the you've got the

national

polls which uh depending on how they

wait things and how they ask the

question and you know some assumptions

that they make when they collect their

data they look a little sketchy don't

they now the national polls sometimes

say Comm ahead sometimes by a lot

sometimes they say Trump's ahead

sometimes by a good amount so the

national polls appear to be completely

funky and unreliable at this

moment but do you think that we can

accurately count how many people have

registered as Republicans versus

Democrats yes because that doesn't

require an assumption and it doesn't

require any there there's not much room

for weasel it's probably just a data

that you're either registered or you're

not so if you're going to believe one

what would be more believable that the

Republican registrations have surged

which would indicate a landslide for

Trump or that the uh individual polls

which we've never trusted in the past

and always seem to get mysteriously

accurate right toward the

election sort of in

October do you do you know what the

October surprise is yet one of them

there's probably going to be lots of

them have you figured out the October

surprise well

if this is true the Republican um

registrations have now outnumbered

Democrat

registrations this election is over in

terms of voting is you know I'm going to

agree with Eric

Weinstein that we don't know if Trump

will become president because the the

Bad

actors looks like there's no limits to

what they'd be willing to do and I mean

actually no limits so I think Trump

probably has a dominant position and it

looks like a landslide if nothing

changes but remember going to be lots of

changes so here's what I think will be

your October surprise now can't

guarantee it can't guarantee it but the

pollsters are all going to be showing a

Landslide by election day because if

they don't if they

don't then next election you're going to

say um there was a landslide and you

weren't even close why should we listen

to you again why should we pay you for

your for your stuff why should we ever

report what you said again so it becomes

really important for the pollsters to

end up in the top five top

10 so if they're way off a few weeks

before election which is what

October the October

surprise is going to be the

polls now you knew it was going to

happen but here's the surprise it's

going to be bigger than you

thought I think the surprise is going to

be the the degree of poller shenanigans

that are happening in September are

beyond what you imagined was

possible that's that's what I think will

be your surprise now I could be wrong

right it'd be easy to be wrong about

this

but when you see the if you see the

people on the streets um I just saw

another person on the street thing

they're asking just young people who

they

supported it seems to be Trump every

time somebody goes on the

street and even if maybe it was always

you know close to half and half the

Trump supporters who are young will say

it out loud with no embarrassment

whatsoever as if it's the cooler thing

to do

now and once you see how many 20-some

people are are you know just yelling

Trump into the the camera so happy to

support him perfectly happy that that

they're seen by their their other fellow

students seen by whoever is going to see

the video there's nothing holding it

back Trump and I

think I think it's because eating the

dogs I think eating the dogs eating the

cats is what made him popular with young

people well plus you know the

assassination attempt was you know

remarkable you know the the fight fight

fight part but the the cats and the dogs

thing is still trending on Tik Tok and

when you see people's reaction to him

and you see the number of people who are

still dancing to that something's

happening something Big's

happening all right of course you know

the big news is Israel took out the head

of Hezbollah with a gigantic set of

bombs bunker Busters I guess yes so

here's what

happened see how impressed you are by

this so uh Hezbollah has like reportedly

I don't know 100,000 rockets that could

be fired at Israel if they were to fire

them all at the same

time or in big waves then the Iron Dome

would have a tough time getting them all

just because of

numbers so really the threat that hezel

had was that will fire them in big waves

at the same time it wasn't really a risk

if they did you know one here or there

the Iron Dome could get them and chances

are it was wasn't going to hit anything

anyway so what do you think it

takes for hzb to fire all of their stuff

at the same time well coordination

obviously coordination and what does

that take well some kind of

communication and what does that take

well you're going to have to use some

kind of

digital

communication and apparently because

they thought the cell phones could be

too easily tracked by Israel they had

moved to pagers and

walkie-talkies which as you know Israel

found a way to make explody so once all

their pagers and walkie-talkies

exploded what's next well the first

thing that you might not realize

is that they may have lost their ability

to coordinate an attack CU if they don't

do it all at the same time they're just

wasting their

missiles send up three missiles Israel

knocks down three

missiles and you're done so if you can't

shoot them all at the same time you've

lost your only weapon the you know the

one that anybody's worried about so I

can't say for sure that they lost that

ability but they haven't launched a big

wave of

missiles and they did lose all of their

leadership and the last guy that was

left said to himself huh I'm going to

have to figure out how to rebuild and

get things coordinated again but I

better not use any digital means so send

out the runners and get the the I don't

know the third level down of commanders

because the other ones have all been

killed and we'll we'll meet in my uh my

command bunker

yeah we're whatever's left of the

leadership of Hezbollah after most of

it's already been killed we're going to

meet in my well-known command

bunker my well-known well-identified

command

bunker knowing that there are obviously

spies working because without the spies

Israel would not have been able to kill

all of the top guys Commander

already wherever they were they got them

all which very heavily suggests there's

an Insider who's saying um he's in a

blue car he's heading down the street

now so the head of Hezbollah clearly not

a strategic genius decided to get what

was left of Hezbollah to meet him in

person in his command

bunker well what do you think happened

then

I'm not supposed to laugh at

War but did this really

happen did Israel really figure out a

way to kill all the leaders and then

make sure that the new team of leaders

all went in the same place at the same

time and that they would know where they

were and when they were there and then

they would drop a bunch of Bunker

Busters on it and just make it a

hole in the

ground well there's nothing funny about

this

situation but Hezbollah had been telling

a lot of lies and Israel decided to

debunker

him that's right they debunker

him uh and when they were

done uh the thing that used to be called

a command bunker uh looked a lot like

Justin Bieber's sphincter after a diddy

party

I I'll just let you live with that one

for a

while take your time take your time

whenever you're done we'll get back to

it okay yeah look like Justin Bieber's

spincter spincter after a diddy party

anyway uh we don't see them uh firing

back a whole bunch of missiles uh Iran

apparently had a big old meeting and

Iran thinks some people are saying Iran

is going to send some

um somebody said Iran might send some

troops to Lebanon I don't know if that's

a good idea for them but

uh it gets better apparently Israel

hacked the airport control tower for uh

for Lebanon Beirut I guess and uh since

we know that Iran apparently was

shipping in supplies and weapons to

Hezbollah uh they got to the control

tower took it over with hackers and told

the planes they better turn around

because they're in trouble if they land

and and there's some evidence that one

of the planes that was coming from Iran

to Lebanon turned around immediately

turned around

immediately which means it was probably

full of weapons don't know for sure but

maybe well if any of this is

true uh

Israel basically just rewrote all the

war books about how you do anything

the the level of

Brilliance that appears to be here now

remember this is still fog of War

propaganda you know we're we're getting

a version of the news that says Israel

is beyond brilliant so just just be

careful that you're maybe not seeing all

the warts you know maybe things weren't

as clean and maybe there was some luck

involved and so we don't know everything

but if we were just to judge it on the

surface it would be the greatest

military strategic

success of my life I mean the the amount

that I am

impressed by what Israel's done

militarily and again I want to if

somebody is new to me I don't back uh

Israel because they don't back me it's

not my job to back Israel now they're an

ally and I take that seriously but I'm

an American so I'm sitting over are

carrying what's good for

me you know Israel is just something I'm

observing and sometimes I say to myself

all right if that happened to America

how would we act well we're full of Dei

so we couldn't get we couldn't pull that

off but I wish we could I wish we were

that

smart anyway um there's a uh there's a

new drone South Korea made a

drone that works on hydrogen

it's a hydrogen drone Tech times says so

this is it's got a 5,800 mile range and

can stay in the air for hours compared

to 30 minutes for a normal drone so if

you've got something that can lift um

some weight and can go 5,800 miles and

stay in the air for

hours the degree of warfare you can do

with small drones because these would be

smallish

ones is a whole new level

so um I don't know how close we are to

an all robot war where it's just drones

in the sky because you don't want to

waste a pilot

and um you know robot dogs on the ground

we're pretty close we're pretty close we

might actually get to the point where if

the robots on one side defeat the robots

on the other that the humans will Just

Surrender rather than send humans to

fight their robots which would just be

Slaughter we'll just say all right you

robots beat our robots we don't like it

but you're in charge now you own our

country we're getting there I think

you'll see it in your

lifetime um judge chuckin according to

Jeff Clark she she's uh gaming with the

uh the timing of things so that few

weeks before the election there would be

some kind of reveal from Jack Smith so

Jack Smith the da he's got some

materials that are we haven't seen But

the redacted version might come out mid

October now

whatever a prosecutor of trump produces

in mid October is going to be bad for

Trump now do you think it's a huge

coincidence that the Badness would come

out at the very worst time do we expect

that whatever Badness he produces is

real like actually in context and

accurate nope I do not believe that I

believe that they would because remember

Department of Justice are criminals and

the criminals are now legal so this

would be the Department of Justice now

they're criminals um so the criminal

thing to do would be to make up a bunch

of and know that there's no time to

correct it before the election and and

just depend on the uh the fake news to

say it's all true and then after the

election you do the fact check it's like

oh oh yeah I guess I guess this wasn't

as true as we thought sorry about that

yeah yeah sorry that's what it looks

like well one of my favorite things

yesterday was that Trump and zinski met

now that's unusual because Trump is not

the sitting president so that you you

have to be delicate about what you can

and cannot do in that situation but I

loved the press conference after where

Trump his 6'3 is standing over zinski is

56 or whatever he is and zalinski just

looked like he' just been punished by

his parents like he looked like a

defeated he didn't look like zalinsky of

old give us weapons we'll fight every

day we win and and Trump is just

saying what was Trump saying he was

saying uh basically it's over we need to

negotiate a deal you know we'll just

figure out who gets what land we'll sort

it out now that's when

zalinski in the past would have said

something like no we will fight we must

get every inch of land back we will

never quit they can't steal our land the

best he could do because he knows

there's a good chance he's going to be

dealing with Trump in the future the

best he could do is remind us that

Russia is on Ukrainian land and so when

they negotiate you know that should be

top of

mind but even he was talking about

negotiating

now correct me if I'm wrong so now

zalinsky seems on board with negotiating

and obviously some kind of land

agreement will have to happen Putin of

course is interested in negotiating and

they're the two sides who's not

interested in

negotiating Democrats and the Deep State

and the military-industrial complex but

if you put Trump in there there's nobody

left who wants the war zalinsky doesn't

really want any more of it you know he

love to win but doesn't seem to be an

option so forget about that yeah all it

takes is a president Trump now when he'd

been saying he could get it done in a

day you know that's hyperbole nobody

could do it in a

day but basically he could because all

it takes is Trump to be president and

then there's nobody in the game who

wants to keep fighting because Ukraine

and Russia definitely don't they

definitely don't and as long as Trump

doesn't there's nobody left so yes he

could wind it up soon as he gets in

there I I wonder if Trump actually

worried that he could end the war before

he got in office and before there's even

an election so that it wouldn't count in

his benefit on the

election but if you want to end this war

you now have a

100% obvious way to do it that you

control as a citizen you can just vote

for Trump and this war is

over it really is all right Bill Maher

had a show last night we always talk

about him he is you know I know it

bothers some people that bill Mah is

always at discussion the next day

because blah blah blah um but he is a a

good indicator of what people are

thinking and on that basis it's

fascinating

and uh he actually said that uh we

should defend

Ukraine um and that it's basically so

little money for the United States that

we're you getting some benefit of

degrading Russia we're protecting our

Ally kind of an ally um and and this is

what Mars says about the

money uh he says that basically none of

us know that none of us can tell the

difference the amount of money we spent

in Ukraine he's saying that you you and

I don't feel

it to which I say have you heard of

inflation now I don't know how much of

the um let's see if our if our deficit

per year is in the over a trillion

dollar range is it like 1.3 trillion

somewhere in that range and how much do

we give to um Ukraine every year

a few hundred billion do we spend a few

hundred billion per year so maybe

15% of our deficit something like that

and then of course we have to build up

our own military because you know we're

we're spending sending our bullets over

there so we got to buy our own bullets

or something so um he is correct that we

cannot identify the difference in our

life from the Ukraine expenses I can't

identify

okay how much of my inflation was

because that war might be

10% but it's also not ending and the

amount we're spending isn't really the

total issue it's about whether we should

be having a war with a nuclear power and

what are we getting from it and is it

worth 200 billion and if we've got 200

billion extra to spend on anything is

that where you want it to go because 200

billion is real

money um anyway so far the it's been 10

billion here 7 billion in there I don't

know what it adds up

to and

um all right V ramaswami says that uh

musk is super hardcore about firing

federal employees working with Trump and

I saw this on the George account good

account to follow on X George H he's Ras

Swami said it looks like Elon will use

OIC on the government's fat and here's a

quote elon's pretty hardcore and V says

I said 75% of the federal bureaucrats he

said you need to put at least

75 so Elon musk's correction to V who

wanted to get rid of 75% of the

bureaucrats was you should say at

least how much do you love that how much

do you love that that if you could

imagine that you could ever get rid of

75% of the de the bureaucrats

um that you should really be saying

more I I just love that I don't know

that they can get rid of more than

75% but the fact that he's not going to

be limited by your 75% estimate I love

that it's at least

75%

anyway um according to the Gateway

pundit Antonio Gro writer

he's got an argument in there opinion

piece that liberal policies are driving

up our obesity rates now up to 40% of

the adults or is it everybody uh

40% are obese I don't know if that's 40%

of oh yeah it is adults and 20% of

children now when I saw that opinion I

said to myself I don't know if I want to

read this because I don't think he's

going to convince me that liberal

policies are making people fat

because I said to

myself how how how are liberal policies

making anybody fat explain that and he

talked about how school gym classes are

cutting way back so kids are less active

in school and I said H Public Schools

okay Democrats pretty much have a lock

on everything that happens in the public

school so yeah I guess okay yeah less

physical activity sure uh then there's

fat acceptance

the idea that Democrats are pushing the

idea that you don't need to lose weight

you're perfectly healthy nobody should

judge you and while I agree with the

notion that I don't like fat

shaming there's no question

that the public attitude toward toward

it has an impact on how people act right

if people say you're fine you can be any

weight you want there's going to be more

people overweight if if the public says

cruy cruy don't be like that there's

probably going to be less of it people

are going to try harder now there might

also be some uh food related uh

illnesses but that's a separate question

I'm talking about anorexia for

example um there are food deserts now in

a lot of poor areas because uh the crime

was so high that uh places that would

sell you healthier food like a grocery

store just said oh we're out here's

there's still McDonald's so good

luck that feels fair and then of course

the pandemic and the lockdown had some

lasting effects so I'm not sure uh you

know how much of the Obesity is because

of liberal policies but I do think that

Antonio made his case he made his case

it it's just we can't tell what

percentage of the whole problem is

caused by that but it's not making it

better anyway there's now jets that are

going to be able to do automatic

takeoffs and landings according to

CNN um

and if he didn't know this and this is

weird uh the more advanced planes could

already land in bad weather and stuff um

on instruments well it could it could

land autonomously so even if the pilot

dropped dead the advanced planes could

just land and and the landing some say

they the machine would do it better than

the pilot pilot can make a human error

the machines much less likely but what I

didn't know is that the um the planes

were not equipped to take off with an a

pilot which seems weird it seems like

taking off would be easier than Landing

but taking off is actually harder I mean

where it can

be so it's actually a big deal that

airplanes are learning to take off on

their own at the same time that uh Robo

taxis are coming on so the idea of

having a human sitting behind a steering

wheel for anything it will be largely

defunct except for recreational stuff

like I don't know maybe your fishing

boat or

something

anyway and that ladies and

gentlemen is all I wanted to say that's

worth saying

today uh we'll keep an eye on whatever

is happening with Hezbollah and Israel

but uh as I've said before if Israel's

going to get tough with its its enemies

and neighbors there's never been a

better time in history to do it because

first of all it seems like they have you

know good handle on the the military

strategy obviously but also there's no

leadership in the United States so if

they can get themselves a little bit

pregnant you know make sure that they're

well into a war against Hezbollah or ran

or whoever they decide to go to war with

um if they do it now Trump won't be B to

stop him because he's not president and

Biden's barely a president and Harris is

out in the road so if you were going to

make a big

move um and you're Israel it's going to

happen now so I would expect maximum

chaos um but there's also a

possibility that Israel will have a

surprisingly fast and good result in

Lebanon because a lot of the Lebanese

I'm hearing are not so pro- esbah so if

Israel could find a way to be um let's

say accurate enough to take out

Hezbollah without killing much in the

way of innocent Lebanese people who

don't like Les hezb either they might be

able to find a workable situation there

maybe imagine how different that would

be if Lebanon were no longer an enemy of

Israel or at least parts of

it so Hezbollah being Bad actors and

Hamas Being Bad actors maybe something

can change we'll see all right ladies

and gentlemen that's all I have for you

I'm going to talk to the local

subscribers privately because of their

awesomeness but uh I'll see the rest of

you on YouTube and Rumble and X tomorrow

same time same place bye for now we've

got 30 seconds to

sip

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e e