Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive October 12, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas

Context —

s have proven it but they're all leaning in that direction. So if that turned out to be true or even just a correlation that was important I'd say I got that one early and correctly. But it's definitely not confirmed that boosting your levels would help you with COVID. It might be later. I predicted that the vaccines wouldn't work. Right now a lot of people believe I did the opposite. But when it…

← Previous segment →

would that count as declassification? And the lawyer said — what did the lawyer say? What do you think? Did the lawyers say that that's true as long as he signals by his actions? The answer is yes. The people who identified as lawyers said yes, he just has to signal it by his actions and it's declassified.

There isn't any legal risk here is there? Because even if you allow that you found the lawyer who disagrees, if most lawyers think it's totally legal you're not going to get a jury to think it's illegal. If most lawyers think it's perfectly legal what you did you're not going to get a jury of 12 people to say it was illegal. It's just not going to happen. There's no legal risk here at all. Yes sir, I don't see one. Unless it's a complete rigged trial and I don't think that's going to happen because there's too much visibility.

Yeah, well we're done with the declassification talk.

All right, Lockheed Martin is putting into operation lasers on warships. So we've heard about lasers on jets. They're testing. But now they've got a laser they can put on a warship. So that's interesting. Do you know what we're going to have to use lasers for? I'll tell you the biggest use of lasers in the future: shooting down drones. The small ones, not the big military ones. Those would be a little harder. But shooting down the small ones. And you know why you're going to have to shoot those down? Because we're probably about a year away from them being filled with fentanyl and becoming the primary terrorist weapon.

Yeah, now I did write a book about that in 2003-ish. When was it? Somewhere around there. And it's called The Religion War. I might read that into YouTube and or Locals. So I might turn that into an e-book just by reading it. But there is no way that terrorists are going to not notice that fentanyl is deadly and is light and easily available. If it's light a small drone can carry it and deliver it anywhere. If it's deadly it's better than dynamite because you can't get dynamite very easily. It's hard to get. You know, see what's the explosive? C4? Yeah it's hard to get C4. But literally every kid can get fentanyl. A teenager can get fentanyl.

So there isn't any doubt where things are going. There's going to be fentanyl and it's going to be on drones and we're going to need lasers to shoot those drones out of the air. Although maybe that's bad too because the drone is still going to crash and the fentanyl is going to get out. I don't know. Maybe there's no solution. But as long as China is sending us fentanyl and it's going through the cartels it's going to us, our future is guaranteed. It's fentanyl on small drones for unlimited terrorist attacks in our population centers. There's no way to stop it except wipe out the cartels and then tell China they're next.

I would definitely kill the fentanyl dealers in China on Chinese territory because China isn't going to nuke us for taking out their terrorists. They're going to get really, really mad about

Context —

it but then it's war. So we can go into their country and just take them out. Now I wouldn't drop a missile on them. I wouldn't fire a missile into China. You have to do it on the ground but it wouldn't be hard. How hard would it be to kill a fentanyl kingpin? Just by giving him an injection of fentanyl. All right, pretty easy. All you need is a blow dart with a little fentanyl and it's like and M…

Next segment → →