Back to episode — Episode 1811 Scott Adams - Fun Times Ahead. I Will Follow The Money And Tell You The Future
Context —
cure malaria? I don't think so. I think he would just buy politicians the way anybody else does, wouldn't he? You would just buy a politician. And have you ever heard that Bill Gates owns a particular politician? There are a lot of people who are owned by billionaires but I haven't heard him owning one. He's like the only name I haven't heard in that context. I don't think it could be more obvious…
← Previous segment →s that there'll be significant, I think Schiff said this, significant in terms of what the president was willing to say and what he wasn't willing to say. What's that mean? So you're going to be shocked by this bombshell. This Schiff tells you will be significant. Okay that's general in terms of what the president was willing to say and what he wasn't willing to say. In other words they have video of him saying things he wanted to say but they don't have video of him saying the things he didn't want to say. I think he said nothing, right? It would be significant that's general because of he wanted to say things. And what so if you read this quickly it sounds like he's telling you that there's a bombshell coming but if you read the actual words there's nothing there. There's just nothing there.
And here's what's going to happen. They're going to show these and here's what they're warning us we will see on these outtakes. You're going to see Trump arguing that he wants to characterize the January 6 protesters as patriots. Oh no I didn't see that coming. Bombshell. That's right. Trump wanted to characterize the protesters as patriots because that's what they are. They could be wrong. They could be wrong about why they were there but they were patriots. They are. Even the ones in jail, even the ones that got violent. They were violent. They need to answer for that but they were patriots. That was the only reason anybody was there was being a patriot. There was no other reason. No other reason. It was just that. And CNN's reporting that that's like suspicious. That's kind of suspicious that you think all the patriots are called patriots. Why would you call the patriots patriots suspicious?
The other thing, the other bombshell is that what is it there was some other claim that was like as innocuous as that. All right whatever it is but there are going to be two claims that are absolutely empty but they're selling us, they're gaslighting us that something's happening while proving to us simultaneously that nothing's happening. They're going to show us nothing and then talk about it like it was something and it will work because it just worked right in front of you. Adam Schiff just talked about literally nothing but made it sound like you saw something. "Oh my God the bombshell. Oh as regarding the thing about the significance of the importance of the bombshell of the shocking news only all they've done is that they've got rid of all the content now and all they do is the shocking words. Okay Mr. Schiff can you give us your read on today's events? Well it's a shocking shocking news of a significant event. It's going to be a bombshell. I think you'll be shocked and appalled at the bombshell shocking events that are significant." All the content is gone. All the content is gone. And they can still sell it without the content because it was never about the content. It wasn't. If you could sell it without the content well I should tell you something. It was always about the feeling. It was never the content.
All right. Here's some new news. My favorite story of the day. 53 percent, this is a Rasmussen poll, 53 percent of Democrat voters say Hillary Clinton should not run for president again in 2024.
Now you know you would not be surprised that Republicans and independents agree by a larger number but 53 percent of Democrats don't want Hillary Clinton. Okay but is it worse? Yes it's worse than that. CNN reports and by far this is the most entertaining part of the news. Like you wouldn't notice it unless you dug in a little bit to get the really funny part but this is CNN's reporting. They have their own poll in which they say the biggest shifts are that Democrats and independents stopped believing in the credibility of our elections. Now let me say that again. You probably said did you think I misspoke? That since 2021 there's been a big shift in the public's belief about the credibility of the elections. The shift is that Democrats went from largely believing elections were credible to not. To Democrats. Did you think I said it wrong again? Did you think
Context —
I said Republicans when I said that? No let me say it again clearly. Democrats. I'll give you the numbers. In early 2021 this is CNN's reporting remember this is important this is CNN. All right in early 2021 90 percent of Democrats said they were at least somewhat confident that elections reflected the will of the people. What? In one year they went from 90 percent Democrats saying that the elect…
Next segment → →