Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive July 1, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2157

Episode 2157 Scott Adams - Talking About The News. Grab Some Coffee And A Pet

Episode #2157 Jul 2, 2023 1:33:19 28,361 views

Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com Content: ----------- - Talking about the news and sipping coffee with you ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. And as you know, and I'm sure you do know this by now, the rest of the media is going to be boring and repetitive today. But not us. We've got some stuff to talk about after the simultaneous sip. And maybe, maybe stay tuned.…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip Energy & Mood Management

would you like to take your experience up to levels that nobody's ever seen before? Well, all you need is a coffee mug or a glass or a tankard, a jeweled stein, or any kind of vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dop…

View segment →
MainContent Energy & Mood Management

per way to consume it, there are two ways, possibly three. Number one goes excellent with exercise. If you're running on the beach, for example, hey Joel. Or if, for example, you were sipping coffee and had a blanket on you in the morning and a dog or a cat on your lap. If you've got a dog or a cat…

View segment →
NewsReaction Climate & Environment

sun? Well, what does openness mean? Wouldn't you, and if you read this, wouldn't you assume that they were kind of serious about blocking the sun a little bit to stop that climate change? Do you think that the details of the story will support this headline? Of course not. No, they're studying it.…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

rom Northern Africa, Muslim I think, but I'm not even sure that's the reason people are rioting. You know, that's the excuse. But of course there are bigger issues. Now some of the rioters probably want to take over the country and make it an Islamic country. Reasonable. You'd expect that they'd wa…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

ther microphone. I'll be back in a moment. How about now? There we go. Sorry, I forgot to fix it the first time. No, the light didn't come on the first time so it wouldn't have stayed. It only stayed up for a second because the battery was dead. But we're all good now, aren't we? All right, thanks f…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

rus I said nope that did not happen. And evolution as well. Right about that. So here's my summary of that. It's way easy to know what isn't true. So it looks like I'm doing better than I am at predicting. If you ask me to predict what would happen that's really hard. But predicting what is not rea…

View segment →
Tangent Luck, Skill & Timing

people that are up on the stage are like five seconds ahead of the people that are just listening. Oh hmm okay. You know if you're bringing people up one at a time like you are that you're going to get that. My question to you is you said something that rang very true with me. A 2020 election was no…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

aid oh he got a good reaction to that all right I guess I got to do that too. So I think you're seeing there's going to be a lot of people joining the best opinions. Some of those best opinions were going to come from Vivek Ramaswamy and people will probably have to just adopt them. So I think yeah…

View segment →
QandA General Commentary

is so much better. So I think those two things make Bitcoin not normal investment. I'm probably not eloquent enough to delve in and give the correct answer but those two questions there are definitely very good answers as to why there are reasons that these they're not as much of a fundamental risk.…

View segment →
MainContent Health & Biohacking

w? Here's the response. That when the original the original virus was out there the original vaccination did in fact stop its transmission but that lasted like no time at all because it mutated. So when Tyson says they told you it would stop the transmission they were right for a while but that whil…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

ou're sold that they didn't work at all it's just so hard for you to say that the other side is a little bit right. It's just so hard but you should. Yeah it's definitely a little bit right that we don't know the five-year implications of the shots right. It's definitely a little bit right or 100 ri…

View segment →

Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. And as you know, and I'm sure you do know this by now, the rest of the media is going to be boring and repetitive today. But not us. We've got some stuff to talk about after the simultaneous sip. And maybe, maybe stay tuned. I'll do a Spaces live at the same time so you can multitask.

But first, how would you like to take your experience up to levels that nobody's ever seen before? Well, all you need is a coffee mug or a glass or a tankard, a jeweled stein, or any kind of vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.

Go.

Ah.

Now, in case you're new to this livestream, the proper way to consume it, there are two ways, possibly three. Number one goes excellent with exercise. If you're running on the beach, for example, hey Joel. Or if, for example, you were sipping coffee and had a blanket on you in the morning and a dog or a cat on your lap. If you've got a dog or a cat with you and you're sipping a beverage and listening to this, you're the happiest person in the world. So keep doing what you're doing.

All right, here's the news. Let's start with some semi-fake news. This is Fox News. Fox News has some semi-fake news. The headline says White House report signals openness to manipulating sunlight to prevent climate change. Do you think that's a true story that the White House has signaled an openness to block the sun? Well, what does openness mean? Wouldn't you, and if you read this, wouldn't you assume that they were kind of serious about blocking the sun a little bit to stop that climate change?

Do you think that the details of the story will support this headline? Of course not. No, they're studying it. The only thing that they're open to is studying it. Being open to look into something is very different than being open to doing it. You wouldn't study it if you thought it was a good idea. I mean, if you were sure it was. So they're just as uncertain as you are, but they're looking at it.

Do you think it's impossible that they could come up with some kind of temporary thing that would seed the clouds or whatever they need to do and still not be dangerous? Well, potentially. You know, obviously you have to worry if they do it wrong, it's the end of human civilization. So there's that. But no, I wouldn't worry about it. I think it's just one of those too on the nose. The White House wants to block out the sun to change climate change. That's a little too on the nose. I think maybe they're just studying it because they study everything. Somebody's got an idea. Let's go study that. That doesn't mean anything.

All right. You know that there are massive protests in France that are ongoing. Trump weighed in on that. He said he wouldn't go to France. France is no longer France. Trump actually said he wouldn't go to France now. Of course, you know that the riots are over the shooting of a young man, I think from Northern Africa, Muslim I think, but I'm not even sure that's the reason people are rioting. You know, that's the excuse. But of course there are bigger issues.

Now some of the rioters probably want to take over the country and make it an Islamic country. Reasonable. You'd expect that they'd want that. And some of them were probably just having fun and causing trouble and looting. And it's probably people have all kinds of different reasons, or they're just mad about white people or whatever they're doing.

But here's how many of you would know the percentage of Muslim population in France. Don't look it up. Don't look it up. Don't Google it. The percentage of their population that's Muslim right now. What do you think? Some of you know the right answer is not 25, but I can see why you'd be guessing that. But no, it's not 25. It's about 10 percent. About 10 percent.

What is the percent of Muslim residents of the United States? Muslim residents of the United States. What percent? One percent. One percent. So France has 10 times the amount of Muslim population. And they're the population that seems to be the most worked up at the moment.

You know, it was some time ago, I don't remember who said it. There was a percentage of Muslim population that would guarantee you became Muslim, that the entire country would eventually become Muslim. Do you remember what that number was? It was 10 percent. I think if you had 10, you end up going Muslim. And I think it has something to do with, maybe you can do a fact check on me, the reasoning behind that was one might be birth rate. There's a higher birth rate. But the other might be that that's just the percentage that they try to take power. When I say they, I mean if there's any members of the group who think that the country should become an Islamic rule, sure, yeah, Sharia law. If you have 10 percent of your population Islamic, they're probably going to try.

Now your point of view of whether that's the worst thing in the world or the best thing in the world would probably depend if you're Muslim. So you can't say it would be a terrible idea if they wanted to take over once they got some power, because that's what everybody does. Everybody who has power tries to use it. So it looks like they have power. Tell me I'm wrong.

France is re-electing President Trump. France is pretty much guaranteeing Trump gets into office, isn't he? Now you know if something happened to Trump, previous legal problems or he self-imploded, I mean there are lots of things that could keep him out. But I don't know how America can watch France if they're paying attention. Now the other thing is that people aren't paying attention. I only just started paying attention. I think the riots in France, how long have they been going on? I just today decided to get interested because I never expect riots to last long. So a riot in another country doesn't interest me. They're like, that's two weeks of rioting and then it goes away. But maybe not. Maybe this is bigger. Belgium's got their issues too.

So I think the biggest thing this does is guarantees that Trump or somebody who's a Republican gets elected. I don't know how you could watch this and say you want to be like it. But let me make a very important distinction. If we're bringing Christian immigrants across the border, we would have our own different set of challenges, but it won't be this. You know, the Christians that are coming across from Central America and Mexico are not looking to change the nature of the country. In fact, their assimilation rate is awesome.

So here's the way I would handle it if I were Trump. This would be really delicate. I don't know if you could get away with it. I think you should get some kind of independent body to determine how many of what kind of immigrants you can let in before it changes the nature of the country. And it could be different for different groups. So I would be opposed to ending Muslim immigration. That doesn't, I mean that seems like way too much. But I wouldn't be opposed to having different limits or rates of people coming in based on how much of a disruption you think it would be. And the amount of disruption probably has everything to do with assimilation rates and nothing to do with genetics or anything like that. It's just there's some cultures that are designed to assimilate and some that are designed to resist assimilation, in my opinion.

The South American, Central American culture is so compatible with American. Once you get the language going, it pretty much is a smooth process, right? Somebody comes from Australia to the United States, smooth process. New Zealand, smooth process, right? China, not so bad. Asian immigrants have done an amazing job. Assimilation of Asian Americans, really good, really good. Let's get some more, right? How about Indian Americans? Assimilation, excellent, excellent. Let's have some more.

But the Islamic immigration is a different animal because the Islamic system will kill you if you leave it. So that's an anti-assimilation philosophy. So if you bring people in who have an assimilation, or at least they don't mind, they're not opposed to it, you can assume that's going to go smoothly in the long run. If you bring a group in whose stated philosophy and religion is no, we don't assimilate, you assimilate to us, what do you expect?

But even then I would make sure that we're bringing in people from everywhere because it's good in the long run. You just got to make sure your rates and your numbers make sense for the philosophy of the people you're bringing in, right? So that's what I think. I think Trump or Ramaswamy could sell the hell out of that.

What do you think is going to happen in France? Does it look to you like this is just going to get bigger and bigger until it's the end? Or do you think there'll be some kind of France-first movement? Will there be a Trump-like, you know, Marie Le Pen or something? Will there be a Trump-like character that rises there?

You know what I heard? I heard that Brexit is unpopular in Great Britain. Is that true? Give me a fact check on that. That there are more people in Britain who wish they had not done Brexit. Is that true? Yeah, I don't know if that's true. I read that. But yeah, the Muslim population would be not too compatible with the woke population. So that's an issue.

All right, but it does make you like Muslims better probably. It's a very pro-Muslim kind of theme that they're against many of the same things that many of you are against. So at least you have common enemies. That's something.

All right. Twitter of course is having some issues today and it is just weird watching people flip out about it. Does it really matter that much if Twitter has some glitches? Is that affecting us a lot? I mean, I don't know. I experienced some little irregularities yesterday but how much did it affect your life? I mean, not much on a weekend and it's a weekend. How much did you really need it?

But anyway, I was looking at some of the takes. Here's the dumbest take. I'm not even going to tell you who it was. It's just somebody on Twitter who decided to say this in public. That Elon Musk's experience running Twitter is proof that rich people shouldn't run companies. Laughs. How drunk do you have to be to tweet that? That's right. The problems through Twitter are more proof that rich people like Elon Musk should not be involved in business. Somebody actually wrote that. That was like a real tweet from a real person who thought that I got a point here. I've got a good point. Watch the retweets rack up on this one. Wow. Wow.

All right, but here's one that's more puzzling. And it's puzzling because the person who's saying it is so smart, which is always kind of messes with my mind. I'm used to, you know, I'm very accustomed to disagreeing with stupid people. Aren't we all? Disagreeing with somebody who's stupid, it's pretty easy and comfortable and you're probably glad you did it. But what happens when you disagree with somebody who's really smart? Doesn't that give you a little pause? Or you disagree with them. Shouldn't you take a step back and say maybe here's one of those.

So Professor Scott Galloway was retweeting his own tweet from I think right around after Musk had purchased Twitter. And Professor Galloway was saying that recent events, and I think he means the Twitter technical problems that are happening right now, I think that was more evidence that he was right when he said right after the takeover that Musk is sort of a cult of personality and his net wealth will be cut in half or could be cut in half because of the Twitter purchase.

Is Elon Musk still the richest person in the world? Am I wrong? You're still the richest person in the world, isn't he? I believe he is. Did his wealth get cut in half? I don't recall that happening. No. So that prediction hasn't come through.

But during, so Professor Galloway said this during a conversation with CNN's Christiane Amanpour, and Amanpour said that Musk is quote "unraveling before our eyes" right now. This is two years ago. So like, or when did you buy it? Was it a year ago? Time is, I've lost my sense of time. But whatever it was that Musk bought Twitter, do you think Musk is unraveling before her eyes? When did that happen? When was this alleged unraveling? He said one of the best years any business person has ever had in the history of business. He's unraveling right between.

So here's what I tweeted. When did Musk say he bought Twitter to make money? Was there ever one time that Elon Musk even hinted that Twitter was a good investment and that's why he bought it? No. He's always said the opposite. He directly says the opposite. You wouldn't buy Twitter to make money. You just wouldn't do that. So why is that even a metric? He bought it for saving free speech. Did he succeed at saving free speech? I say yes. I say yes. I would say that Twitter is the only place you can have free speech right now. Am I wrong about that? I don't believe there's a second place. What's the second place you go to for your free speech? Name it. Name your second place. Well, Gab. Okay, yeah, there's some fringe, I won't say fringe, there's some alternative entities that are too small to be meaningful at this point. Yeah, Rumble. Rumble, I'll give you Rumble. You know, within bounds. I mean Rumble's got constraints as well. Dilbert Reborn is one place you can get free speech, but that only applies to me apparently. I'm the only one who has it and that's only because it's behind a subscription wall anyway.

I was fascinated because I don't understand the attack on Musk from Scott Galloway. So I feel like he's judging him on a standard that doesn't fit the situation. If he said I'm going to try to make money with this and then failed, I'd agree with him. He said the opposite though.

All right, there's another mass shooting and I don't know, Baltimore. 28 people were injured, two of them died. 20 walked into hospitals. I don't even know what to say about it anymore. What do you say about it anymore? I mean now it's just business as usual, isn't it?

So do you think this is a gun problem? Is it a gun problem? I would say this is a people living in dangerous places problem. Because isn't there a higher gun, well let me ask a question. Isn't there a higher gun ownership rate in the country than in the cities? You know, per person. Aren't there way more guns in the country?

Oh, did I lose out? Looks like I lost sound so I'm going to have to find another microphone. Hold on, hold on. I think I have another microphone. I'll be back in a moment. How about now? There we go. Sorry, I forgot to fix it the first time. No, the light didn't come on the first time so it wouldn't have stayed. It only stayed up for a second because the battery was dead. But we're all good now, aren't we? All right, thanks for telling me.

So yeah, there's not much to say about the mass shooting except people should move out of those areas if they can. So if you want to be where you have a low chance of being shot, you should go where there's a low chance of being shot, which ironically is probably where there are more guns in the country.

All right, let's talk about Ukraine. So I was reading all the social media about Ukraine and here's what we know about the counter-offensive. There's one of three things happening in Ukraine and I'm pretty sure about this. All right, it's hard to be certain about things in Ukraine but finally I have certainty. There's one of three things happening with the Ukrainians trying to break through. They're either having no progress whatsoever or they're breaking through in a small way or they've made major gains. So it's one of those three things. I'm sure of it. I'm sure of it. Yeah.

So the reporting on Ukraine is absolutely useless. So they're either successfully probing for weaknesses and any moment they're going to run through with their entire army so it's really going well, or they've made no progress whatsoever and it's a big old slaughterhouse. It's one of those two things. I'm sure of it.

By the way, have you seen Prigozhin lately? Does anybody have a picture of him on his balcony or walking with his dog in Belarus? He's probably with your dog. You know, your dog that your kid's thing died but really went to Belarus to live the rest of his life in for eternity. He might have one of those.

Well, here's my theory. Here's my theory about Prigozhin. And if you look at the fact that he hasn't been seen at all, I feel like there's only one conclusion. He's been abducted by the UFOs. Now the UFOs, we've also not got good pictures of, so that would be the perfect place for him to hide because we just can't find the UFOs. So if he could get on a UFO that might be the best way to stay away from Putin. Plus he'd have access to all that advanced technology.

You know what's interesting? You know if you want to be mad at your American government, if you're American, here's another thing to be mad at. We have all of these UFOs which means by now of course we've reverse engineered their technology and we won't give that technology to Ukraine who desperately deserves it. Can you believe it? We have all this advanced alien technology and we don't give any of it to Zelensky. We're like, no, we're only going to give you the earthly stuff. How would you like some Earthling weapons? And he's like, Earthling weapons? You're giving me the weak stuff. No, I want the stuff from Centauri Prime. No, no, no, you can't have the stuff from Centauri Prime. No, no, we're saving that for us. But we've got a lot of earthly goods that you know will get you all killed but if you could have that you could have all of it. Yeah, that's right. The UFOs have Prigozhin. Yes they do.

And you know what the UFOs have as a weapon? Do you know what their main weapon of the UFOs is? Because we know that now. It's a secret sonic weapon that they mostly use on embassies. This is sort of the embassy secret sonic Centauri Prime kind of a weapon.

All right, there's no real news today. I'm doing the best I can. I'm doing the best I can with a slow news day. Give me a break.

I saw David Sacks throwing up a little caution that I guess Lindsey Graham went over to Ukraine and there's some kind of a red line that's being drawn. That if Russia blows up a Ukrainian, specifically there's one in danger I guess, if they blow up a Ukrainian nuclear power plant, that although that's a red line and you know maybe there'd be more escalation if they do that. Now David Sacks points out it looks like a false flag is being created. So first you create the red line. Oh, if you do this then the United States will get more into the war. And then the United States does this themselves. In other words like his Gulf of Tonkin.

So the thinking is that maybe America and Ukraine would blow up Ukraine's own power plant that happens to be under the control of the Russians right now as part of a war strategy. I'm going to say no. I'm going to say no on that.

Here's what I think. I think the United States would sink a boat to start a war. I think they do that. I think we would stage a false flag attack on maybe a building or something. Maybe. I think we would do some pretty bad stuff. But I don't see us bombing a nuclear power plant. Does that really bring you forward somehow? You really get ahead if you do that? How in the world could that be a good idea?

So your Gulf of Tonkin is one ship goes to the bottom of the ocean. It's clean. You got your deaths but otherwise it's clean. But destroy a nuclear power plant? That would be the very worst idea that anybody ever had for a false flag attack. I don't know if we'll ever see anybody attack their own nuclear power plant. That feels like something that just can't happen. Like nobody's mind would ever go there.

Now if I'm wrong, well I guess I'm gonna have to say I'm wrong. So and by the way there's a good chance that that nuclear power plant will have some explodey stuff happening and there's a good chance we won't know who did it. So I think there's a very high chance some stuff could go down and we don't know who did it. But intentionally, intentionally that's a stretch. It's something to be concerned about, to look at. And you know if it turns out that the Russians get blamed for blowing that thing up you could be very skeptical. And to me I don't see why that's a red line at all actually. If it's such a big problem that it would be a red line, would we do it ourselves? I mean it just doesn't make sense. So I'm going to say that doesn't quite make sense. I'm going to bet against it but keep an eye on it. So I think David Sacks is right to say keep an eye on that.

I've noticed that when I make predictions my best predictions are things that don't exist. So you know I just gave you three of them. I told you that the secret sonic weapon wasn't real the day it came out. So far we haven't found it and it looks like it wasn't real, right? I told you that when the Vegas shooter was called ISIS, you know I said nope it's not ISIS. It wasn't. When the UFO thing, you know when there was a credible sounding person who says the United States has all these UFOs, I said nope you're never going to see proof of that. Nope. And then when Prigozhin allegedly his plane went to Belarus I said nope that did not happen. And evolution as well. Right about that.

So here's my summary of that. It's way easy to know what isn't true. So it looks like I'm doing better than I am at predicting. If you ask me to predict what would happen that's really hard. But predicting what is not real, you know that the news says is real, it's actually somewhat easy. Yeah it's just too on the nose. It's always the same. It's always the same. It's just too on the nose. You could spot it right away.

And by the way how many of you are happy that you learned the too on the nose trick? How many have just automatically, you know you can spot the fake news now just right away. Wait, oh that's in the news. Yeah it's like isn't it like a magic sense? It's almost like you got a sixth sense. As soon as you can see the too on the nose stuff you spot the fake news like you have magic or something. Yeah it's a really powerful technique.

Scott, predictions are all ego based to appear smarter than you. Hmm. Is there something you do that isn't ego based? Like what? Because that was a real smart comment. That the predictions are ego based. Well what would be, I'm just curiosity, what would be something that a human does that's not ego based? What would that be? Yeah, yeah it's a dumb comment. It's a dumb comment a hundred percent. What you do is for your selfish or maybe your family or something but that's selfish too. It's all for ego. Every bit of it. Predictions aren't the one thing I do for ego. Everything I do is for ego because everything I do has something to do with making me more effective or useful in the world because it makes me feel good. It's all ego.

Getting rid of your ego feels really good by the way if you can ever do it. It gives you a feeling of euphoria but it doesn't last long. That's why the psychedelics are good. They remove your ego temporarily and the reason it's euphoric is that it's such a relief because we're walking around just managing our egos all day. It's hard but you're very lost if you think that there are some situations in which ego counts and then the others don't. That's not the reality.

All right. I had offered that I would start up a Spaces on Twitter so if somebody wanted to ask me questions they can. So I've got it all fired up here. Does anybody want to go to Spaces? And you can stay here and listen to it or you can listen to it on Spaces but I'm gonna hit start now. Yeah we'll see if anybody comes in.

All right everybody. I don't know if anybody's here yet but this will be your opportunity to ask me any question. So raise your hand if you want to be a person who asked me a question. It could be any topic. I don't care what it is. Oh look all my friends are signing up there. All right. Is anybody, raise your hand if you want to ask me a question. Could be on anything. It's a slow news day so we're just sort of looking at a reason to talk about something and enjoy your coffee if you're sitting there with your coffee and your dog on your lap. Well you're doing it right because that's the vibe this weekend. Dog on lap.

All right. I've got one request here that as a speaker. Very curious. In a moment you will be a speaker. Hey Curious are you there? Thanks for accepting my speaker request. Pleasure. What's your question? Day Brothers go ahead.

What do you think is happening with the Tate now? Do you think that he will be released at any time or do you think he's definitely going to prison and it's just kind of over for him?

Well, Romania is sort of a big black box. I don't think any of us know what that situation is. So this is the perfect example that I always say that the news about public figures is never true. It's just never true. Now I base that on knowing lots of public figures and also being in the news hundreds if not thousands of times myself. And I can see the stories about myself and I know if they're true or not. And then often there are people I know personally so I can find out the real story behind the scenes and this never matches. It just never matches and not even close. You usually, there's at least one fact that changes everything and the public isn't aware of that fact.

So with the Tate brothers I would summarize it this way. Is Romania, so I'd be amazed if everything that's happening is by the book and non-corrupt. I just assume there's some corruption. I don't know how it plays into the story but one assumes it's part of the story. Then the other question is is there somebody outside of Romania who is the puppet master trying to get Romania to clamp down on these guys? I think the odds of that are good. I don't have proof of that but it seems like something that could happen in our world.

Then that but the other wild card is their capabilities. The reason that you talk about them at all is they're hyper capable. They're just really really capable at a wide range of things. You know social media, making money, maybe some sketchy activities but they made them all work. Yeah almost everything they did worked. So assuming that they still have access to lots of funds, do you think they can bribe their way out in time? And so you might have a situation where you have the most probably two of the most capable people in terms of persuasion, money, social media. And if they can't get out of this nobody could.

So there's a little bit of a Houdini show going on which is two people in the situation that no normal person could get out of but they're not normal people. They are the two people who would have the best chance of getting out of a tight spot. You know especially if it's complicated and you know there's lots of levels to it and you got to be a chess player but they are. That's exactly what they are. They are chess players. So I'm fascinated at the competition if you will that the entire legal system of Romania versus the Tate brothers. Tate brothers is actually a fair fight and I don't know which way it'll go. It honestly could go either way. They could be completely free and vindicated possibly or the Romanians will get their licks in.

All right. Does that answer your question? I think you're, yeah thank you thank you very much. I just wanted to know your take on it but I'll let somebody else ask some questions now. Thank you Scott.

All right thanks. All right let's see. Javi. Is it J J A V I? Is that Harvey or Javi? Maybe you'll tell me. Javi are you there? Yes. How do you pronounce your name? It's Javi. Javi. Okay Javi what is your question?

Which is your favorite conspiracy theory that actually turned out to be true?

Well the one I guess that's closest to me which is that Twitter was in fact thumb on the scale in a variety of ways that we still haven't figured out. So it always felt like it was true and then to find that it was true was pretty good. The idea that the Democrats were behind the Russia collusion. It took me a while to realize that that didn't happen sort of organically. You know that there was actually just a plot. It was exactly what you thought it was. So I think Musk accurately said that it seems like all of our conspiracy theories are coming out to be true.

Oh and on, you believe everything? No my ex-wife did not hook up with Andrew Tate. I don't know if you know this but Andrew Tate is not reliable in terms of the truth.

All right. Did I answer your question? I think you muted so I'm going to say yes. Yes thank you.

All right thanks. All right let's try somebody else here. Robert. All right Robert let's see if you're ready to get on here and ask me a question. Robert. Hello Robert. Robert there's a little delay with the interface so it just it's trying to connect but there he is. No not yet. It's weird it's cooking like it can't connect so it's not Robert's fault. His technology is not working. All right well that's where it is. Still not working. I might have to undo that one and try somebody else. Oh Ed is a speaker. All right we're having a user interface glitch. I can't add this speaker and I can't subtract them but what happens if I try to add somebody else? All right I'm going to try to add somebody else. Chris you may have successfully been added. If you unmute your microphone Chris you can ask me a question. Hey Chris.

Okay I will. I will say there's like a five second delay in these Spaces from the people that are up on the stage are like five seconds ahead of the people that are just listening. Oh hmm okay. You know if you're bringing people up one at a time like you are that you're going to get that. My question to you is you said something that rang very true with me. A 2020 election was non-transparent by force and you know therefore it was illegitimate. I was wondering if you might expand on that a bit so that other people can understand it because I think that very simple thing proves quite a bit right there.

Well by non-transparent by force I think you're referring to one situation where Republican observers were denied access. There were multiple but yes. Yeah well you know that allows you to doubt the election. So I don't care what anybody tells you did or did not happen. If you have a right to watch and they tell you you can't you should draw exactly the conclusion from that that an informed person should. That there's something going on because if there wasn't anything going on well maybe they'd let you see.

Now the counter to that is that they're just worried that the observers would be troublemakers and they were just trying to make their life easier. Maybe. That's entirely possible. But you can't have that situation and also have confidence. You can have irregularities and then no confidence but you can't have irregularities and then confidence. You gotta pick. So if you're gonna go with irregularities don't ask for the confidence in the result. We can't give you that. That's logically incompatible.

So I don't have any evidence that the election was rigged. Zero evidence of that that I'm aware of. There are lots of claims but if you were to track all of the claims from the beginning of the election denial claims they're almost all wrong. Now will there be some that pan out? I don't know. Maybe. Anything's possible. But like I always say the big picture is this. If you have a system that is not fully auditable and people have a really big incentive to game the system they will. Yeah maybe not 2020 but eventually you know there's no way you can avoid it. So we have a system that attracts and guarantees rigging. I would say it guarantees it. It's designed to attract it and guarantee it in the long run. If it were designed to avoid it it would be designed very differently I imagine. So that's what I think.

All right thanks Chris. All right let's bring up Christopher Hill. So it'll be a little five second delay or so. All right Christopher if you unmute you can talk. Skill stack regarding communication persuasion skills and that clearly had a lot to do with him rising above the pack and getting into the White House. So I guess the question is this. As you look at 2024 how much of an impact will that persuasion skill stack take or do you think that there are other aspects of his skills that may make it different to 24? Is it just a completely different environment?

Well the big question that's being asked on the right is whether the elections are designed so that the Republican could ever win. And I don't know the answer to that. I don't know. It could be that between the legal manipulations and the ballot stuffing that persuasion just doesn't matter anymore. It could be just who's running the better game on the ground. So it might be that it doesn't matter. The thing that was different about Trump is that he was bringing a new weapon into the field that nobody recognized. But you know I could see it early. So that was a very special case. It's not some kind of thing where I could always guess who the next president is going to be. That was just a one-off. I just had a special sort of a special vision on a specific variable that was gigantic and was invisible to other people.

So I would think that the first thing that's happening is that with the little primary action going on in the Republican side that the best ideas are starting to be grabbed by all the candidates. So you saw that I think most of the candidates said they would get tough with the military with the cartels. It's because when Trump said it everybody said oh he got a good reaction to that all right I guess I got to do that too. So I think you're seeing there's going to be a lot of people joining the best opinions. Some of those best opinions were going to come from Vivek Ramaswamy and people will probably have to just adopt them. So I think yeah it's a different landscape. I don't think just a super persuasive person coming could come in and tear things up now. RFK Jr. is super persuasive. Vivek is super persuasive. Trump is super persuasive. And I do think that they're going to move the conversation the most and already have. Already have. Thanks for the question.

All right let's take another one. All right Ronan. Listen you have a good name so I'll add you. Ronan this is you. Connect. Unmute your microphone and you can ask me a question. Hello Ronan. Hi Scott. Full ask me anything. Can I ask for your personal take on Bitcoin and do you hold any Bitcoin?

Personal take on Bitcoin. First of all yes I hold Bitcoin. I believe Bitcoin is a hundred percent unpredictable meaning that you don't know what the government's going to do and you probably never will. So you got that government risk that hangs over it. However having said that I've recommended before that if you have something like a portfolio then maybe if you want five percent of it to be in Bitcoin that makes sense. So I would use Bitcoin as a diversification tool not as a singular investment tool. That said there will be people who do exactly the opposite of my advice and make huge fortunes. There will be others who do the opposite of my advice and lose huge fortunes probably depending on their timing.

So Bitcoin is a diversification play for somebody with a normal portfolio. If you're young, if you're 25, you've saved up five thousand dollars and you just want to throw a bet down maybe you might get a 50 gain one year and be happy you did. So if you're young and you can absorb a small loss get a little more aggressive. I'm giving you basically the most common investment advice there is right.

So quick. Yeah I used to be with a gentleman strategy. Are you familiar with him? I'm familiar with him yes. Talks one particular talk called the Sailor Breedlove series. It's very long-winded. It's probably a 20-part series each part's two hours so it's not an easy watch but it's absolutely fantastic. But doesn't it come down to this? So Bitcoin would do great except for two risks. One is the government risk which cannot be predicted and the other is a technology risk which is either somebody can crack it or somebody can come up with a better Bitcoin then everybody says oh why would I use Bitcoin when this is so much better. So I think those two things make Bitcoin not normal investment. I'm probably not eloquent enough to delve in and give the correct answer but those two questions there are definitely very good answers as to why there are reasons that these they're not as much of a fundamental risk.

Well okay without hearing the argument it's hard to debate it but I'll just say this. I'm not going to believe anybody who says government is predictable or technology is predictable. Yeah there's nothing you could tell me that would change my mind on that. But anyway so thanks for the question and I'm going to move on. Appreciate it. Nice to meet you. Thank you.

All right thank you. Let's do another one here. The fool would like to come on. This sounds dangerous. All right fool calls himself a fool. It looks like we got a technology problem on that one. Oh unmute your microphone fool and ask me your question. Hey Scott you hear me? Yes. Again what's your question on fentanyl right? Yes this year correct. So I think in prior YouTubes or podcasts or spaces or whatever you said you haven't like used your entire I would say persuasive ability. Is that still a thing on fentanyl?

Well the entire Republican primary group wants to militarily attack the cartels so I think maybe I'm doing okay. Is, are you doing it on purpose? Are you using your force? All right. Yes yes. Okay okay. Let's say I'm a state voter on the transitioning of children okay which I view as like an objective evil okay. Following I would say I was going to see if you want to join teams vice versa basically no. If you wanted to switch over to the transitioning of children no I'm going with the numbers. I don't know how many kids transition. I would agree with you on kids maybe waiting until they're adults so no argument on the issue but you can't make your single issue two issues and also if you want to join your team no I know. I'm saying I don't want to go from the big team to the small team. How many people do you, how many kids I think it's a bigger issue. How many kids do you think transition per year? Oh but give me one that's one too many. Is it more than the 70,000 dying from fentanyl every year? My guess is probably.

Objective evil where I see the transitioning of children and as an objective evil maybe okay they're trying to make money from. Well I don't believe in objective evil. I believe in saving as many people and keeping our lives good and keeping us safe and happy and stuff. So objective evil is a sort of a frame. It's more of a point of view but that's my persuasion point. Yeah but it doesn't work on me so I don't believe in evil and free will and stuff like that but thanks.

All right thanks for the question. All right thanks. Yeah I don't believe in evil. And I guess the reason I don't believe it is that it doesn't have a use. There's no usefulness for that frame. There are things that you want to stop and there are things you want more of. That's the end of it. There's stuff you want more of. There's stuff you want less of. You don't need to give any extra words on it. There's stuff you know people doing bad things. People do bad things sure.

All right let's take another one. Chris. Chris as soon as your microphone shows up here. Hey Chris. On you unmute your microphone and ask me your question. Hey Scott. Hi Chris. The last question at I have a five-year-old and a seven year old. What's your typical in the future of education and like colleges in the future? Do you think we'll exist still a few big ones? The future colleges.

Well I feel like it's going to change. I mean everybody can say the obvious it's just not going to look the same in 10 years. The teachers union still has a solid grip so I think it comes down to money. If there's enough money to build alternative school choice then it's going to happen like crazy because I think almost everybody wants the school choice at this point if they're really paying attention. So if money becomes available it's going to happen like crazy.

And oh yeah I feel like there's going to be more of a learning specific skills and putting together a skill stack than universities. I think that the cost and the benefit of the college education is largely debunked at this point in the sense that if you could afford, let's say your parents could afford to pay for your college totally, it would be a nice four years of meeting people and maybe getting a little more mature and learning some skills would be useful. But I feel like there's going to be tons of people who don't want to spend that money, don't have the extra money to spend and can just directly learn the things they need for a practical successful life.

So I think the AI is going to be the teacher for more and more people until it's the only teacher. You know I've often said that the problem with remote learning is that all they did is put a camera in front of a regular teacher. That's like the dumbest thing. Yeah exactly you're not getting it back right. You should start from scratch and say what does this new technology do that the old one won't. And one thing it does is you could put together a team of teachers for one course. So you can say hey I've got a graphics expert who's going to really make this come alive visually. I've got somebody who's really good at engaging a crowd. Somebody's just good at talking in front of people and people want to watch that person. Maybe they're good looking too. And then somebody to write the plan so it's compatible with what your future needs are and it's just the right lessons. But you would put a team together including maybe a director and a producer. You know almost a Hollywood model. And then you compete with the other little clips of AI is teaching other things and you just let the market decide which is the right one.

So my general take is that online learning or computer learning is worse than 80 percent of in-person learning but the very best which has not been created yet, the very best online AI teacher will be 10 times better than the best human experience. But we're not there yet. So I think universities will, maybe the exception of the norm of academic instructor, I think the university is just going to become rich people clubs. You know just maybe a place to get some networking going but not necessarily proving that you can code better. Yeah I would still be around as a social club basically that says you're in the club now.

They, Harvard's on the way to destroying their biggest asset because if they're enrolling people who are not coming from wealthy families which they're trying to do at a bigger, that's a great good in many ways. Lots of positive but you're going to be networking with somebody who had a single mom and grew up in a poor city. So you have access to network with the one person, the other your classmate who might be awesome might become a billionaire but you lose the access to that one person's family which could have also been very connected as well. So Harvard's networking value should be dropping precipitously.

All right thanks. All right how are we doing? Are people enjoying this? Do you want more of this? All right a little more of this.

All right let's see Adam's a good name. So Adam you're going to be connected here and unmute your speaker and ask your question on your microphone. Adam I can't hear you. Adam might have a microphone problem. All right so that didn't work. Let's try Patrick. You look interesting. Unmute your microphone Patrick. Hey here I am. Hey what's your question Patrick?

I have a question before someone is to say I saw Greg Gutfeld on here and I wanted to encourage everybody to read his book The Plus. It's basically you can be a plus or minus in the world with every decision you make and it's a really really great book. My question is I remember listening to your podcast way back when in early 2020 and you were talking about how the media had taken this stance against hydroxychloroquine and what kind of a risk they were doing if it worked. And now that everything's turned out the way it is you know I feel like them suppressing hydroxychloroquine at the time that they did basically destroyed the world. And so as I think the accountability should be first for that.

So Patrick in your reality, yeah it seems we're all in our own little realities and your reality has hydroxychloroquine been shown to be effective and safe for COVID? I used the Zelenko protocol when I got COVID. In no no anecdotes no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no. I'm not going to listen to an anecdote. I'm not going to hear about one patient. You have to answer the question. Do you think that science has proven that hydroxychloroquine worked? No anecdotes. That it's a crime against humanity that they are still denying it but your opinion is based entirely upon your certainty that it does work. That's true.

Okay yeah I mean I wish I could join you. I do have appreciation for what RFK Jr. and others say that it almost looks like the tests were designed to fail. Absolutely they were. Yeah yeah. But I suspect that if I were to talk to the people who put those tests together they would change my mind. You know I haven't done that but the problem is every time you hear one side of anything it sounds convincing right? Yeah so when somebody says I looked at that study and the amounts are too high and was obviously designed to fail and it was not matched with zinc and all these things and they sound true or given to people late. I remember giving late. Right right yeah. So I remember. Okay all of those things they sound like reasonably good points but I haven't heard the counterpoint. I haven't heard the people who ran the test say yes I know why you're asking the questions but there's actually a good reason for it. Here's why we did it. Maybe it would be convincing. I don't know. So for me it's a big I don't know. Yeah but I wouldn't rule it out. I wouldn't rule it out. I think that it being an ionophore for zinc and zinc stops the replication of the virus. The better question was how did it not work? And one thing another thing I heard you say that I wish people pursued on is that is there anybody who used it correctly early and died anyway? And you would think that there were those. Those would have been advertised all over the place. I thought it was I thought I did hear some of those but I may have been wrong. There were so many anecdotal reports that they'll run together in my mind. But one of the things I was watching was to see if there was any location that completely solved their problem with hydroxychloroquine. You know I thought there'd be some city in South America or something whether it be somebody who just went hog wild and just eliminated their problems. So I expected to see that. Now Africa sometimes used as an example but what percentage of Africans do you think are actually taking hydroxychloroquine? It's not a big percentage. It's just they used a lot there but not as a percentage of the people. No I know it's a lot as a quantity but not as a percentage right. So anyway okay. But thanks for the question Patrick. Sure.

All right how about let's listen to Dr. Hank. We got a doctor in here. He said what kind of doctor? Ob-gyn. All right Dr. Hank as soon as you connect turn off your microphone and ask your question. Dr. Hank are you there? Oh sorry I utterly just putting pretty space. Thank you. All right I just came in so I don't know what the conversation has been. I just got in. You know I'm a physician who four years ago was a certain kind of physician and COVID has totally in my opinion ripped my blinders off. And the topics could take all day to go through but one perfect example you just mentioned the hydroxychloroquine. When COVID started I'm what's called a locum tenens doctor so I travel all around the country. And when COVID started I was, well hold on hold on hold on. You're a traveling gynecologist? Yes okay it's called locum tenens. It's basically you know you do assignments to fill in spots all around the country. Yeah I've been doing it full time for eight years. My wife and dogs and I just are full-time gypsies now. I've been doing that too but apparently I need some kind of certification. You're telling me? No I'm just kidding just kidding just kidding. All right go ahead go ahead with your question.

Well anyways again I'm kind of forcing the topic. I don't know really what you want to talk about. Whatever you want whatever you want go ahead. Okay whatever. Since you brought up hydroxy. So when I during COVID I've worked in six different hospitals in four different states. I started in Washington outside of Seattle and if you remember the nursing home Kirkland nursing home north of Seattle was kind of the initial hot spot in the U.S. And I was in this little hospital across the Puget Sound and we were having meetings about putting up tents in the parking lot with patient beds and cots because we believed the initial rhetoric that this was going to be a massive undertaking that there were going to be corpses in the street and that Seattle would fill up immediately so we wouldn't be able to fly patients to Seattle which is their normal custom there.

And I had also done missionary work in Africa and had been taking hydroxy for years for malarial prophylaxis so I was very familiar with it and I was heavy on, I've been on heavy on Twitter for about the last eight or nine years and I was immediately connected with intensivists in Seattle and in New York City and right away those guys were talking about Fauci's own paper in 2015 talking about hydroxy is a great prophylaxis for SARS one. And a couple biochemists came on and physi microbiologists started talking about the mechanism which the other guy mentioned it being an ionophore and zinc has etc. And then I very quickly learned about vitamin D3. To make a long story short I got on that stuff right away. You know I was very attentive to it and the day that the music died so to speak if you follow my Don McLean reference was when Trump mentioned it and immediately it was basically turned into a pariah. I mean I had just built a prescription at a local pharmacy a couple days before and I called them after that statement and they're like we're no longer doing it. And you know I'm an old fart I'm 63 and so I've been practicing since the mid 90s and that's never happened in American medicine before where pharmacists or politicians tell doctors what they can or can't do with an approved medication. So yeah things just got worse you know.

Did you have a question for me? Into these studies there are tons of studies. No I'm not no I'm not sincere about that at all. So you're here's the problem I don't believe any studies. Well it yeah and you know that's a true statement to a large degree. I mean that is part of the problem. I mean one of the things that I was not aware of before which is kind of a fundamental thing that I'm presuming as an informed person you're aware of and that is how much of the regulatory agencies are actually paid for by the regulated. Oh yeah I mean oh I'm quite aware of that yes. Yeah no that starts that starts always starts the discussion for people with me is that if you start with that financial component that has to create a you know exactly what we saw glasses to look through. Right yeah exactly what we saw. Yeah so thanks thanks for the comments doctor. Okay I'm gonna make some comments after but thanks for joining. Yep yeah I would say you know the one thing you could say about the whole COVID situation is that follow the money worked again right. Follow the money explained to 100 percent of what you saw. Every bit of it. There wasn't one thing that wasn't explained by follow the money. So there we are.

All right let's try Neely. Co-founder and CEO of Distill. Professor okay you look, an econ nerds so you look interesting. All right Neely as soon as you connect unmute your microphone. There you go. Hi Neely do you have a question or personal? Okay thank you. You said anything. Yeah anything's good. Okay. When you draw do you listen to music and if you do what are you listening to?

The answer is no I don't listen to music when I draw. I've already done the thinking so the writing has already happened so I can't listen to anything when I'm writing. I have to be quiet when I draw. I do like noise. The ideal noise would be people. So if I'm sitting in Starbucks I want to hear people sound or there's somebody in the house just even if they're just working or something just somebody around. And then I do like to watch a show or the news or a YouTube or something. So I do like to have some kind of entertainment on. Was there a deeper part of that question? Curious.

I was like you I've always been a fan of obviously of your work as like millions and zillions of people are and I love listening and learning about how people do their craft for the people who do excellence. And I just thought here's an opportunity to ask you. I will also say thank you. You retweeted one of my tweets on the economy once and it was the most bonkers day I've ever had in Twitter with the notifications. So also thank you. Thanks for answering my question.

All right you're welcome. Thanks for the question. All right that was an easy one. I like talking about myself. I know I know all the answers when I'm talking about myself.

All right Paul. All right. Music arts. He's a mass formation disrespector and a confirmed propaganda confronter. All right I'm adding you as a speaker Paul. As soon as your microphone is on. Hey there you are. Hi Paul. Hi how you doing? Hi Scott thanks for taking the call. Yeah what's your question? Benjamin Owen. Benjamin. The name is familiar. I don't know where where are you going with this? I just I don't know if you're aware of him. I don't see you guys interact on Twitter. I didn't know if you were familiar with his work or not. But why why are you asking about him in particular? What's the connection? I'm a fan of both of your works just you know just being able to say the emperor has no clothes and say things that might be unpopular at the time but are true. Ah okay all right. I'm not trying to draw any conclusions from that. That's all I'm I just was curious. All right all right thanks for the question Paul.

All right let's hear from, I probably won't pick anybody who doesn't have a profile picture so I like this Brunella is a rebel likes wildflowers and cracking concrete. Perfect. Brunella turn off your mute and ask me a question. Hello no I haven't. Hi nice to meet you. I have a strong question from Europe from Berlin. Who is owning Blackrock and why how can be possible that the same riots fake looting revolution and all this type stuff that is happening in the United States is now in France and they're gonna bring it all over Europe and what's your idea about all this happening? Thank you.

Did you think that was caused by Blackrock? Was that the question? I didn't say that no. I just would like to know is Blackrock we know the Vanguard they own Blackrock and Blackrock own Vanguard. The problem is that there is really the hair going on in Europe and I'm sure that this is all over guys and at the moment I cannot tweet I don't know why but I can go in Spaces and they're not answering to me. Why we have a different contract of Twitter in Europe respect to other countries and I think they're trying to silence us very badly. So we're trying to fight to see really what's going on. So we use the space to have these answers and we all know that I don't know if you've never had a chance to see Monopoly the video it's really interesting. I showed up all behind these things. We zoning really everything is actually Blackrock's and now we are trying just to find out what the heck is happening guys because Blackrock is only North Russia so what's the game you know?

Well I'll take my best shot at that question. Thank you so much. I'd be surprised if Blackrock had anything to do with the riots per se. I don't see the connection there but it seems like the riots in Europe are just immigration related. There's no mystery there is there? And that's something that people should know and we try to share this message guys know about immigrant at all is really the full population that is upset. They arrest 3,000 people almost about what what is the issue? I thought the people who were actually burning things are the immigrants are they not? Well they're using immigrants as a tool you know because of course they don't want to show that the people are against what's they're taking all our rights away one by one very slowly and it starts of course with a pension and start with the yellow vest. They're taking the farmland away the you know what's happening with the energy guys. We don't have in Germany energy anymore so the companies are closing down. People start to fight for their rights but they want to play the game of giving the fall to the immigration. That's why they let so much people leave Africa and go all over Europe and create this kind of fake emergency with the immigrants. The truth is that they want to play this card to cheat to fake the fact that the people are making revolt from there to the militarization is already happening in France. In Paris there are more than 14,000 people and they are beating everyone.

Who's doing all these evil plans? Is that the government's working with Blackrock or do you think Blackrock is doing it on its own? Yeah the problem is that in Europe we don't have any more area leader. All our leaders Chuck Maloney check shows such check all the others they get they get elected by promising to go against this and as soon as they were elected they turned completely and they keep on following the same orders. So what do you think what do you think is behind it all? Well it will be easy to say you know very often we say of course because we know that we have a lot of people from U.S. you know we have military bases all over Europe so of course it's easy for us to say that there is a lot of infiltration also in every institution and so on. We know that it's happened and is real but the truth is that we see what's happening in America so we know that also there is happening the same. That means that there is a big power with a lot of money. This is pretty clear. If you watch if you had the chance I will invite the people to see Monopoly. It's now my brother nothing at all but I find some answer really important answer there about the fact that there is these two only two corporations that now own everything in the planet but but do you don't you think the corporations want capitalism and prosperity because that's what benefits them? From humanity seems that they even decide to start the population. My point of view it's real I don't know that. My take is that it's unrelated. They're either unrelated or barely related events. There's just a lot of stuff is happening. Some of it is just excess energy after the pandemic. I always assumed that there would be some release of energy that had been tamped down too long and it would sort of look like this. So I feel like there's a big upheaval that just had to happen but it's just coming out of a lot of different windows and doors and for different reasons. Just too much energy. I don't see that there's any large corporate entity whose well-being depends on a stable world with lots of people buying stuff. I can't see them wanting to cause instability. So capitalists almost always want stability over instability. So if somebody is creating instability that would only make sense for a specific industry such as defense which I do think happens. I do think the defense industry creates instability to sell weapons but outside of the defense industry I can't see Blackrock wanting instability. That would be outside of every economic understanding in the world. But thanks for the comments. Thank you.

All right how about one more? One more yeah for that. Let's get Kathleen. She's got a cat for a picture. Kathleen you were being selected because your profile picture is a cat. What's your question Kathleen? I'm good thanks. What's your question for me?

I have a question regarding your one as a statement and that you're such a pillar of light in this crazy world that we're in and you're really on to food being linked to a lot of the problems that we have in our world today. And my question is have you ever heard of the Weston A. Price Foundation? No. My next question will be will you ever check it out? I was thinking there might be some kind of follow-up to that. So the answer so far is no I'm not going to follow up because you've given me no reason to follow up. What is it? Why do I care about it? Well they do they tell you the truth about food and there was a dentist back in the 30s and he self-funded a study. His name was Weston A. Price that's the foundation name. He self-funded a study where he went into 14 different cultures that were remote from modern day living and found he was a dentist and his patients were experiencing all kinds of health problems whether it be cancer or bad dental problems and just a lot of health problems. And so he did some research and found over a 10-year period that there were common denominators not all the same but that they had traditional food preparation and fermentation and you know I think we're well beyond the point where we need to prove it. It seemed like a hundred percent of every study ever done shows that our current food source is bad for us and there's better ways to eat. So yeah I think I'm so sold on that point of view that extra selling isn't necessary in my case but that might be something that other people are interested in. So thanks for the call Kathleen. Hey thanks for taking my call. All right I appreciate it.

We're gonna do for today. I think we've done it all. Deep dive in this you'll be pleasantly surprised. Michael Schellenberger did a, is it on video that might be interested? I'm like a parent to you. How old are you? I'm old enough to be most of your parents.

All right I'm going to turn off Spaces. Thanks for joining. All right yo it's interesting how many, well I'm not going to go there. Did anybody have the feeling that the last thing you wanted to talk about is COVID? Like it just it just hurts at this point. It's just painful isn't it? Because there's nothing left to say. There's just nothing left to say. Tomorrow somebody's gonna say oh there's my new study that the shots killed you dead and then the day later it'll be another one that says the opposite and we don't we won't know anything.

So can you remind me the name Eric Dyson? What's his name the scientist? The era is it Eric why I have part of his name wrong right? He's a three Freeman wait what's his name? No Dyson Dyson. Neil deGrasse Tyson. All right thank you. So he was on yesterday and he was talking to Erica who's the podcaster you keep telling me to pay attention to. Medi or somebody what's the name of his Erica who do you keep telling Hassan you know the podcaster you sent to me. All right Maddie is on I think that's correct. So many Assad had a podcast with why can't I remember his name? There's something weird about his name that makes it impossible to remember for me anyway.

So here's what's interesting about that. I was listening to it yesterday as I was floating in my pool and the conversation was about the pandemic and the vaccinations and stuff. And I thought that whoever he is I'm going to say the scientist on the podcaster. Okay let me confess I don't know both of their names correctly and I'm not going to learn it here. So one of them is a scientist there's a podcaster. You know who I'm talking about but the scientist I thought gave the podcaster a good spanking on the benefits of the vaccination. This is not me speaking. This is not me. How many of you how many of you think I just gave you my opinion? Didn't happen. There were no opinions here. I'm saying that as a debate Tyson won hard and it was very interesting. I'll tell you I'll tell you where the holes were that he pushed through.

Number one is you know why would you take an experimental vaccination? And then Tyson would say experimental it was tested. And then the podcaster would say it wasn't tested. And then he would say it was tested it was definitely tested. And then the podcaster would say but you know how do you know if you tested it for nine months how do you know that in five years you're not going to get a problem? And then the scientist says well that's actually a risk yes but how do you know you wouldn't get a long COVID or how do you know that the virus itself wouldn't give you a problem in five years? So watching them fill in each other's holes of logic here was actually really interesting.

Now of course there's no conclusion. So when I say that the scientist won the argument I'm saying that he didn't say anything that's not logical and smart. So here let me give you his argument. So the podcaster says the vaccinations did not stop the transmission. Do you know what the answer to that is? The vaccinations did not stop the transmission which we all know to be true but do you know what the response is? How many of you know what the response to that is? Just even know what they say in response to they being the scientists. Do you know? Here's the response. That when the original the original virus was out there the original vaccination did in fact stop its transmission but that lasted like no time at all because it mutated. So when Tyson says they told you it would stop the transmission they were right for a while but that while didn't last long. Is he wrong? He's probably I don't think he's wrong. I think it did stop. If you had the exact shot with the exact variant it would stop it cold but that didn't last.

So both of them had trouble accepting the other's point which is sort of what I say. I see people having trouble saying it totally worked for 10 minutes. People want to say it didn't work or they wouldn't say it worked. Tyson's the only one who says it accurately. It totally worked for 10 minutes and it worked a little bit for the next variant but not much and then after that it was useless. So I believe that's the accurate answer. It worked perfectly for 10 minutes but it's also true that everybody knew it would only last 10 minutes. Yeah I'm exaggerating with the 10 minutes.

Then the other part that Tyson got right is that you're not just taking an experimental vaccination. You're taking a chance on the vaccination that was designed to help you versus a virus that was actually designed to hurt you. Who knows which of those is more dangerous? I don't know it all.

So anyway so I thought he did a real good job of explaining that stuff. Then the part that he didn't do well on is Tyson was saying oh so the podcaster says what about this documentary of all these young athletes dropping dead. Tyson was not aware that that's not true that that's been widely debunked. Just the data is bad but the podcaster got to present that to the public like it was true.

Now here's what Tyson said even if it is true which was a mistake because it was very untrue. He said even if it is true let's say 10,000 people dropped dead from the shot but they think it saved 10 million. And here's what the podcaster should have said but didn't. You already know where this is going right? Here's where that should have gone. The podcaster should have said but the people the people under a certain age had basically zero risk but the vaccination was a risk. So he should have bifurcated it and said whoa whoa the old people maybe young people it's a whole different situation.

So the trouble is everybody's this is a Greg Gutfeld thing you know the prison of two ideas. If you're sold that the vaccinations work or you're sold that they didn't work at all it's just so hard for you to say that the other side is a little bit right. It's just so hard but you should. Yeah it's definitely a little bit right that we don't know the five-year implications of the shots right. It's definitely a little bit right or 100 right and it's a hundred percent right that you don't know what the risk of the COVID itself and you hope that maybe the shot in some cases reduced your chance of long COVID but you don't know. There's no way to know even if it's real long COVID.

All right that's all for now. Bye on YouTube.

foreign good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization and as you know and I'm sure you do know this by now the rest of the media is going to be boring and repetitive today but not us we got some stuff to talk about after the simultaneous hip and maybe maybe stay tuned I'll do a spaces live at the same time so you can you can multitask but first how would you like to take your experience up to levels that nobody's ever seen before well all you need is a cover of mug or a glass of tanker jealous of style and the canteen geographlask of vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dope be new of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now go ah now in case you're new to this live stream the proper way to consume it there are two ways possibly three number one goes excellent with exercise if you're running on the beach for example hey Joel or if for example you were sipping coffee and had a blanket on you in the morning and a dog or a cat on your lap if you've got a dog or a cat with you and you're sipping a beverage and listening to this you're the happiest person in the world so keep doing what you're doing all right here's the news let's start with some semi-fake news uh this is Fox Fox News has some semi fake news the headline says White House reports signals uh wait White House yeah White House report signals openness to manipulating sunlight to prevent climate change do you think that's a true story that the White House has signaled an openness to block the Sun well what does openness mean wouldn't you and if you read this wouldn't you assume that they were kind of serious about blocking the Sun a little bit stop that climate change do you think that the details of the story will support this headline of course not no they're they're studying it the only thing that the only thing they're open to is studying it being open to look into something is very different than being open to doing it you wouldn't study it if you thought it was a good idea I mean if if you were sure it was so they're just as uncertain As You Are but they're looking at it do you think it's impossible that they could come up with some kind of temporary thing that would seed the clouds or whatever they need to do and and still not be dangerous well potentially you know obviously you have to worry if they do it wrong it's the end of human civilization so there's that but now I wouldn't worry about it I think it's just one of those two on the nose the White House wants to block out the sun to change climate change that's a little a little too on the news I think maybe they're just studying it because they study everything somebody's got an idea let's go study that that doesn't mean anything all right uh you know that there is a massive protest in France that are ongoing uh Trump weighed in on that he said I wouldn't go to France France is no longer France Trump actually said he wouldn't go to France now uh of course you know that the the riots are over the shooting of a Young Man I think from Northern Africa Muslim I think but I'm not even sure that's the reason people are are writing you know that's the that's the excuse but of course there are bigger issues now some of the writers probably want to take over the country and make it in an Islamic country reasonable you'd expect that they'd want that um and some of them were probably just having fun and causing trouble and looting and it's probably people have all kinds of different reasons or they're just mad about white people or whatever they're doing but here's how many of you would know the percentage of Muslim population in France don't look it up don't look it up don't Google it the percentage of their population that's Muslim right now what do you think some of you know the right answer is not 25 but I can see why you'd be guessing that but no it's not 25.

it's about 10 about 10 percent um what is the percent of Muslim uh residents of the United States Muslim residents of the United States what percent one percent one percent so Fred says 10 times the amount of Muslim population and they're and that's the population that seems to be the most worked up at the moment you know it was some time ago I don't remember who said it it was a there was a percentage of Muslim population that would guarantee you became Muslim that the entire country would eventually become Muslim do you remember what that number was it was 10 percent I think if he had 10 you end up going Muslim and uh I think it has something to do with maybe maybe you can do a fact check on me the reasoning behind that was uh one might be birth rate there's a higher birth rate but the the other might be that um that's just that's just the percentage that they try to take power when I say they I mean if there's any members of the group who think that the country should become an Islamic rule sure yeah Sharia law if you have 10 of your population Islamic they're probably going to try now the you know your point of view of whether that's the worst thing in the world or the best thing in the world would probably depend if you're Muslim so you you can't say it would be a terrible idea if they wanted to take over once they got some power because that's what everybody does everybody who has power tries to use it so it looks like they have power um tell me I'm wrong France's re-electing president Trump France is pretty much guaranteeing Trump gets into office isn't he now you know if something happened to Toronto previous legal problems or he self-implosed I mean there are lots of things that could keep him out but I don't know how America can watch France if they're paying attention now the other thing is that people aren't paying attention I I only just started paying attention I think the the rise in France how long have they been going on I I just today decided to get interested because I never expect riots to last long so a riot in another country doesn't interest me they're like that's two weeks of rioting and then it goes away but maybe not maybe this is bigger Belgium's got their issues too so um I think the biggest the biggest thing this does is guarantees that Trump or somebody who's a republican gets elected I don't know how you could watch this and say you want to be like it but let me make a very important distinction if we're bringing Christian immigrants across the border we would have our own different set of challenges but it won't be this you know the the Christians that are coming across from Central America and Mexico are not looking to you know change the nature of the country um in fact their assimilation rate is is awesome so here's the way I would handle it if I were Trump this would be really delicate I don't know if you could get away with it I think you should get some kind of independent Bobby to determine how many of what kind of immigrants you can let in before it changes the nature of the country and it could be different for different groups so I I would be opposed to ending you know Muslim immigration that doesn't I mean that seems like way too much but I wouldn't be opposed to having different limits of rates of people coming in based on how much of a disruption you think it would be and the Iran the amount of disruption probably has everything to do with assimilation rates and nothing to do with you know genetics or anything like that it's just there's some cultures that are designed to assimilate and some that are designed to resist assimilation in my opinion the South American you know Central American culture is so compatible with American you know once you get the language going it pretty much is a smooth process right somebody comes from Australia to the United States smooth process New Zealand smooth process right China not so bad you know Asian immigrants have done an amazing job assimilation of Asian Americans really good really good let's let's get some more right how about Indian Americans assimilation excellent excellent let's have some more but the Islamic is immigration is a different animal because the Islamic system will kill you if you leave it so that's that's an anti-assimilation philosophy so if you bring people in who have a assimilation or at least they don't mind you know they're not opposed to it you can assume that's going to go smoothly in the long run if you bring a group in who's stated philosophy and religion is no we don't assimilate you assimilate to us what do you expect but even then I would I would make sure that you you know I'd make sure that we're bringing in people from everywhere because it's good in the long run you just got to make sure your rates and your numbers make sense for the philosophy of the people you're bringing in right so that's what I think I think uh Trump or Rama Swami could sell the hell out of that um sure um what do you think is going to happen in France does it look to you like this is just gonna get bigger and bigger until it's on the end or do you think there'll be some kind of France first movement will there be a trump you know Marie Le Pen or something will there be a trump-like character that rises there you know what I heard I I heard that uh brexit is unpopular in Great Britain is that true give me a fact check on that that there are more people in Britain who wish they had not done brexit is that true yeah I don't know if that's true I read that but um yeah yeah then the the Muslim population would be uh not too compatible with the woke population so that's an issue all right but it does make you like Muslims better probably it's a very pro-muslim um kind of theme that they're against many of the same things that many of you are against so at least you have common enemies that's something all right um Twitter of course is having some issues today and it is just weird watching people flip out about it does it really matter that much if Twitter has some glitches is that is that affecting us a lot I mean I don't know I mean I experienced some little irregularities yesterday but how much did it affect your life I mean not much on a weekend and it's a weekend how much did you really need it but anyway I was looking at some of the the takes uh here's the dumbest take I'm not even going to tell you who it was it's just somebody on Twitter who decided to say this in public that Elon Musk has experience running Twitter is proof that rich people shouldn't run companies laughs how drunk do you have to be to tweet that that's right the problems through Twitter are more proof that rich people like Elon Musk should not be involved in business somebody actually wrote that that was like a real tweet from a real person who thought that I got a point here I've got a good point Watch the watch the retweets rack up on this one wow wow all right but here's one that's uh more puzzling and it's puzzling because the person who's saying it is so smart which is always kind of messes with my mind I'm used to you know I'm very accustomed to disagreeing with stupid people aren't we all disagreeing with somebody who's stupid it's pretty easy and comfortable and you're probably glad you did it but what happens when you agree with somebody who's really smart doesn't that give you a little pause or you disagree with them shouldn't you take a step back and say maybe here's one of those so Professor Scott Galloway was retweeting his own tweet from I think uh right around after musk had purchased Twitter and Professor Galloway was saying that recent events and I think he means the the Twitter technical problems are happening right now I think that was more evidence that he was right when he said right after the Takeover um that that Moss is sort of a cult of personality and his net wealth will be cut in half or could be cut in half because of the Twitter purchase um is it Elon Musk still the richest person in the world am I wrong you're still the richest person in the world isn't he I believe he is did his wealth get cut in half I don't recall that happening no um so that prediction hasn't come through but uh during so Professor Galloway said this during a conversation with CNN's Christian Amanpour and Amanpour said that musk is quote unraveling before our eyes right now this is two years ago so like or when did you buy it was it a year ago time is I've lost me sense of time but whatever it was that musk uh bought Twitter do you think musk is unraveling before her eyes when did that happen when was this alleged unraveling he said one of the best years at any business person has ever had in the history of business he's unraveling right between so here's what I tweeted when did musk say he bought Twitter to make money was there ever one time the Elon Musk even hinted that Twitter was a good investment and that's why you bought it no he's always said the opposite he directly says the opposite you wouldn't buy Twitter to make money you just wouldn't do that so why is that even a metric he bought it for saving free speech did he did he succeed at saving free speech I say yes I say yes I would say that Twitter is the only place you can have free speech right now am I wrong about that I don't believe there's a second place what's the second place you go to for your free speech name it name your second place well gab okay yeah there's some friends when I won't say Fringe there's some alternative entities that are you know too small to be meaningful at the point yeah Rumble Rumble I'll give you Rumble you know within within bounds I mean Rumbles got constraints as well Dilbert dilber reborn is one place you can get free speech but that only applies to me apparently I'm the only one who has it and that's only because it's beyond a subscription wall anyway um I was fascinated because I don't understand the attack on on Musk from Scott Galloway so I feel like he's he's judging him on a standard that doesn't fit the situation If he if he said I'm going to try to make money with this and then failed I'd agree with them you said the opposite though all right uh there's another mass shooting and I don't know Baltimore uh 28 people were injured two of them died 20 walked into hospitals I don't even know what to say about it anymore what do you say about it anymore I mean now it's just business as usual isn't it so do you think this is a gun problem is it a gun problem I would say this is a people living in dangerous places problem because isn't there a higher gun well let me ask a question isn't there a higher gun ownership rate in the in this in the country than in the cities you know per person aren't there way more guns in the country oh did I lose out um looks like I lost sound so I'm going to have to find another microphone for my hold on hold on I think I have another microphone I'll be back in a moment how about now um there we go sorry I forgot to fix it the first time no the uh the light didn't come on the first time so it wouldn't have stayed it only stayed up for a second because the battery was dead but we're all good now aren't we all right thanks for telling me so yeah there's not much to say about the mass shooting except uh people should move out of those areas if they can so if you want to be where you're you have a low chance of being shot you should go where there's a low chance of being shot which ironically is probably where there are more guns in the country all right let's talk about Ukraine so I was reading all the social media about Ukraine and here's what we know about the the counter-offensive uh there's one of three things happening in Ukraine and I'm pretty sure about this all right it's hard to be certain about things in the Ukraine but finally I have certainty there's one or three things happening with the Ukrainian trying to break through they're either having no progress whatsoever or they're breaking through in a small way or they've made major gains so it's one of those three things I'm sure of it I'm sure of it yeah so the reporting on Ukraine is absolutely useless so they're they're either successfully probing for weaknesses and any moment they're going to run through with their entire Army so it's really going well or or they've made no progress whatsoever and it's a big old slaughterhouse it's one of those two things I'm sure of it by the way have you seen progosian lately does anybody have a picture of him on his balcony or you know walking with his dog in Belarus he's probably with your dog you know your dog that your kid's thing died but really went to Belarus to live the rest of his life in for eternity he might have one of those well here's my theory here's my theory about progression and if you look at the fact that he hasn't been seen at all I feel like there's only one one conclusion he's been abducted by the UFOs now the UFOs we've also not got good pictures of so that would be the perfect place for him to hide because we just can't find the UFOs so if he could get on a UFO that might be the best way to stay away from Putin plus he'd have access to all that advanced technology you know what's interesting um you know if you want to be mad at your American government if you're American here's another thing to be bad at we have all of these UFOs which means by now of course we've reversed engineered their technology and we won't give that technology to to Ukraine who desperately deserves it can you believe it we have all this Advanced to alien technology and we don't give any of it to zelenski we're like no we're only going to give you their Earthly stuff how would you like some Earthling weapons and he's like Earthling weapons you're giving me the weak stuff no I want this stuff from Centauri Prime no no no you can't have the stuff from said Tory bribe no no we're saving that for us but we've got a lot of Earthly Goods that you know will get you all killed but if you could have that you could have all of it yeah that's right the UFOs have progosian yes they do and you know what the uh the UFOs uh have as a weapon do you know what their main weapon of of the UFOs is because we know that now it's a secret Sonic weapon that they mostly embassies this is sort of the embassy secret Sonic Centauri Prime kind of a weapon all right there's no real news today I'm doing the best I can I'm doing the best I can with a slow news day give me a break I saw David sacks uh throwing up a little Caution that I guess Lindsey Graham went over to Ukraine and there's some kind of a red line that's being drawn that if uh that there's a red line being drawn that if Russia blows up a Ukrainian specifically there's one in danger I guess if they blow up a Ukrainian Nuclear Power Plant that although that's a red line and you know maybe there'd be more escalation if they do that now David Sachs points out it looks like a false flag is being created so first you create the red line oh if you do this then the United States will get more into the war and then the United States does this themselves in other words like his Gulf of Tonkin so so the thinking is that maybe America and Ukraine would blow up Ukraine's own power plant that happens to be under the control of the Russians right now uh as part of a war strategy I'm going to say no I'm going to say no on that here's what I think I think the United States would sink a boat to start a war I think they do that I think we would stage a false flag attack on maybe maybe a building or something Maybe I think we would do some pretty bad stuff but I don't see us bombing a nuclear power plant does that really that really brings you forward somehow you really get ahead if you do that how in the world could that be a good idea so your golfer Tonkin is one ship goes to the bottom of the ocean it's clean you got your desks but otherwise it's clean but destroyed a nuclear power plant that would be the very worst idea that anybody ever had for a false flag attack I don't know if we'll ever see anybody attack their own Nuclear Power Plant that feels like something that just can't happen like like nobody's mind would ever go there now if I'm wrong well I guess I'm gonna have to say I'm wrong so and by the way there's a good chance that that nuclear power plant will have some explodey stuff happening and there's a good chance we won't know who did it so I think there's a very high chance some stuff could go down and we don't know who did it but intentionally intentionally that's a stretch it's something it's something to be concerned about to look at and you know it if it turns out that the Russians get blamed for blowing that thing up you could be very skeptical and and to me I don't see why that's a red line at all actually if it's such a big problem that it would be a red line would we do it ourselves I mean it just doesn't make sense so I'm going to say that doesn't it doesn't quite make sense I'm going to bet against it but keep an eye on it so I think David Sachs is right to say keep an eye on that um I've noticed that when I make predictions my best predictions are things that don't exist so you know I just gave you three of them I told you that the secret of Sonic weapon wasn't real the day it came out so far we haven't found it and it looks like it wasn't real right I told you that when uh when the Vegas shooter was called Isis you know I said nope it's not Isis it wasn't when uh the UFO thing you know when there was a credible sounding person who says the United States has all these UFOs I said nope you're never going to see proof of that nope and then when pergosian allegedly his plane went to Belarus I said nope that did not happen an evolution Evolution as well right about that so um here's my here's my uh summary of that it's way easy to know what isn't true so it looks like I'm doing better than I am at predicting if you ask me to predict what would happen that's really hard but predicting what is not real you know that the news says is real it's actually somewhat easy yeah it's just too on the nose it's always the same it's always the same it's just two on the nose you could spot it right away and by the way how many of you are happy that you learned the two on the nose trick how many have just automatically you know you can spot the fake news now just right away wait oh let's do it in the news yeah it's like isn't it like a magic sense it's almost like you got a sixth sense as soon as you can see the two on the nose stuff you spot the fake news like you have magic or something yeah it's a really powerful technique uh Scott predictions are all ego based to appear smarter than you hmm is there something you do that isn't ego based like what uh because that was a real smart comment um that the predictions are ego based well what would be uh I'm just curiosity what would be something that a human does that's not ego based what would that be yeah yeah it's a dumb comment it's a dumb comment a hundred percent what you do is for your selfish or maybe your family or something but that's selfish too it's all for ego every bit of it predictions aren't the one thing I do for ego everything I do is free go because everything I do has something to do with you know making me more effective or useful in the world because it makes me feel good it's it's all ego getting rid of your ego feels really good by the way if you can ever do it it gives you a feeling of euphoria but it doesn't last long that's why uh the psychedelics are good they remove your ego temporarily and the reason it's euphoric is that it's so it's such a relief because we're walking around just managing our egos all day as hard but you're very lost if you think that that there are some situations in which ego counts and then the others don't that's not the reality all right um I had offered that uh I would start up as spaces on Twitter so if somebody somebody wanted to ask me questions they can so I've got it all fired up here does anybody want to go to spaces and you can stay here and listen to it or you can listen to it on Spaces but I'm gonna hit start now yeah we'll see if anybody comes in all right everybody I don't know if anybody's here yet but this will be your opportunity to ask me any question so raise your hand if you want to be a person who asked me a question it could be any topic I don't care what it is oh look all my friends are signing up there all right is anybody uh raise your hand if you want to ask me a question could be on anything it's a slow news day so we're just sort of look at looking at a reason to talk about something and enjoy your coffee if you're uh if you're sitting there with your coffee and your dog on your lap well you're doing it right because that's that's the vibe this weekend dog on lap all right uh I've got one request here um that as a speaker very curious in a moment you will be a speaker hey curious are you there thanks for accepting my speaker request pleasure what's your question day Brothers go ahead what do you think is happening with the taste now um do you think that he will be released at any time um or do you think he's definitely going to prison and it's just kind of over for him well your remedia is sort of a big black box I don't think any of us know what that situation is so this is the perfect example that I always say that the news about public figures is never true it's just never true now I base that on knowing lots of public figures and also being in the news you know hundreds if not thousands of times myself and I can I can see the stories about myself and I know if they're true or not and then often there are people I know personally so I can find out the real story behind the scenes and this never matches it just never matches and not even close you usually there's at least one fact that changes everything and the public isn't aware of that fact so with the Tay Brothers I would summarize it this way is Romania so I'd be I'd be amazed if everything that's happening is by the book and you know non-corrupt I just assume there's some corruption I don't know how it plays into the story but one assumes it's part of the story then the other question is is there somebody outside of Romania who is the Puppet Master trying to get Romania to clamp down on these guys I think the odds of that are good um I I don't have proof of that but it seems like something that could happen in our world then that but the other wild card is their their capabilities the reason that you talk about them at all is they're hyper capable they're just really really capable at a wide range of things you know social media making money maybe maybe some sketchy activities but they made them all work yeah almost everything they did worked so assuming that they still have access to lots of funds um do you think they can bribe their way out in time and so you might have a situation where you have the most probably two of the most capable people in terms of persuasion money social media and if they can't get out of this nobody could so there's a little bit of a Houdini show going on which is two people in the situation that no normal person could get out of but they're not normal people they are the two people who had would have the best chance of getting out of a type of a tight spot you know especially if it's complicated and you know there's lots of levels to it and you got to be a chess player but they are that's exactly what they are they are chess players so I'm fascinated at the um competition if you will that you know the entire legal system of Romania versus the Tate Brothers Tay Brothers is actually a fair fight and I don't know which way it'll go it honestly could go either way they could be completely free and Vindicated possibly or the Romanians will you know get their licks in all right um does that answer your question I think you're yeah thank you thank you very much I just wanted to know your take on it um but I'll let somebody else ask some questions now thank you Scott all right thanks all right let's see uh Javi is it j j a v i is that Harvey or Javi maybe you'll tell me Javi are you there yes how do you pronounce your name it's uh Javi Javi okay Javi what is your question um which is your favorite conspiracy conspiracy theory that actually turned out to be true uh well the I I guess the one that's closest to me which is that Twitter was in fact um how does thumb on the scale in a variety of ways that we still haven't figured out so it always felt like it was true and then to find that it was true was pretty good the uh the idea that the Democrats were behind the Russia collusion it took me a while to realize that that didn't happen sort of organically you know that there was actually just a plot it was exactly what you thought it was so I think musk accurately said that it seems like all of our all of our conspiracy theories are coming out to be true uh oh and on you believe everything no my ex-wife did not hook up with Andrew Tate I don't know if you know this but Andrew Tate is not reliable in terms of the truth all right uh did I answer your question I think you muted so I'm going to say yes yes thank you all right thanks all right let's try somebody else here uh Robert all right Robert let's see if you're ready to get on here and ask me a question Robert hello Robert Robert there's a little delay with the interface so it just it's trying to connect but there he is no not yet it's weird it's it's cooking like it can't connect so it's not Robert's fault his technology is not working all right well that's that's where it is still not working I might have to undo that one and try somebody else oh Ed is a speaker all right we're having a user interface glitch I can't add this speaker and I can't subtract them but what happens if I try to add somebody else all right I'm going to try to add somebody else Chris you may have successfully been added if you unmute your microphone Chris you can ask me a question hey Chris okay I will I will say there's like a five second delay in these spaces from the the people that are up on the stage are like five seconds ahead of the people that are just listening oh hmm okay you know if you're bringing people up one at a time like you are that that you're going to get that my question to you is you said something that uh rang very true with me a 2020 election was non-transparent by force and you know therefore it was illegitimate uh I was wondering if you might expand on that a bit uh so that other people can understand it because I think that very simple thing uh proves quite a bit right there well by non-transparent by force I think you're referring to one situation where Republican observers were denied access there were multiple but yes yeah well you know that allows you to doubt the election um so I don't care what anybody tells you did or did not happen if if you have a right to watch and they tell you you can't you should draw exactly the conclusion from that that an informed person should that there's something going on because if there wasn't anything going on well maybe they'd let you see now the the counter to that is that they're just worried that The Observers would be troublemakers and they were just trying to make their life easier Maybe that's entirely possible um but you can't have that situation and also have confidence you can have irregularities and then no confidence but you can't have irregularities and then confidence uh you gotta pick so if you're gonna go with your regularities don't ask for the confidence and the result we can't give you that that's logically incompatible so I don't I don't have any evidence that the election was rigged zero evidence of that that I'm aware of uh there are lots of claims but if you were to track all of the claims from the beginning of the election denial claims they're almost all wrong now will there be some that you know pan out I don't know maybe anything's possible but like I always say the the big picture is this if you have a system that is not fully auditable and people have a really big incentive to to game the system they will yeah maybe not maybe not 2020.

but eventually you know there's no way you can avoid it so we have a system that attracts and guarantees rigging I would say it guarantees it it's designed to attract it and guarantee it in the long run if it were designed to avoid it it would be designed very differently I imagine so that's what I think all right thanks Chris all right let's bring up spring up Christopher Hill so it'll be a little five second delay or so all right Christopher if you unmute you can you can talk skill stack regarding communication persuasion skills and that clearly had a lot to do with him Rising above the pack and getting into the White House so I guess the question is this as you look at 2024 how much of an impact will that's that persuasion skill sack take or do you think that there are other aspects of his skills that may may make it different to 24 is it just completely different environment well the big question uh that's being asked on the right is whether the elections are designed so that the Republican could ever win and I don't know the answer to that I don't know it could be that you know between the the legal manipulations and the ballot stuffing that persuasion just doesn't matter anymore it could be just who's running the better game on the ground so it might be that it doesn't matter the thing that was different about Trump is that he was bringing a new weapon into the field that nobody recognized yeah but you know I could see it early so that was a very special case it's not it's not some kind of thing where I could always guess who the next president is going to be that was just a one-off I just had a special uh sort of a special Vision on a specific variable that was gigantic and was invisible to other people so uh I would think that the first thing that's happening is that with the little primary action going on in the Republican side that the best ideas are starting to be grabbed by all the candidates so you saw that I think most of the candidates said they would get tough with the military with the cartels it's because when Trump said it everybody said oh he got a good reaction to that all right I guess I got to do that too so I think you're saying um there's going to be a lot of people joining the best opinion some of those best opinions were going to come from Vivek ramaswamy and people will probably have to just adopt them so I I think uh I think yeah it's a different landscape I don't think just the a super persuasive person coming could come in and tear things up now RFK Jr is super persuasive uh Vivek is super persuasive Trump is super persuasive and I do think that they're going to move move the uh I think those are the three that will move the conversation the most and already have already have thanks for the question all right let's take another one uh all right uh Ronin listen you have a good name so I'll add you Ronan this is you connect uh unmute your microphone and you can ask me a question hello Ronan hi Scott full ask me anything can I ask for your personal take on bitcoin and do you hold any Bitcoin personal takeout Bitcoin first of all yes I hold Bitcoin um I believe Bitcoin is a hundred percent unpredictable meaning that um you don't know what the government's going to do and you probably never will so you got that government risk that hangs over it however having said that I've recommended before that if you have something like a portfolio then you know maybe if you want five percent of it to be in Bitcoin that makes sense so I would use Bitcoin as a diversification tool not as a singular investment tool that said there will be people who do exactly the opposite of my advice and make huge fortunes there will be others who do the opposite of my advice and lose huge fortunes probably depending on their timing so Bitcoin is a diversification play for somebody with a normal portfolio if you're young if you're 25 you get a you've saved up five thousand dollars and you just want to like throw a bat down maybe maybe you might get a you know you might get a 50 gain one year and be happy you did so if you're young and you can absorb a small loss get a little more aggressive I'm giving you basically the most common um investment advice there is right so quick yeah I used to be with a gentleman strategy are you familiar with happening I'm familiar with him yes talks uh one particular talk called the Sailor Breedlove series it's very long-winded uh it's probably a 20-part series each part's two hours so it's not an easy watch but it's absolutely um fantastic but but doesn't it come down to this so Bitcoin would do great except for two risks one is the government risk which cannot be predicted and the other is a technology risk which is either somebody can crack it or somebody can come up with a a better Bitcoin then everybody says oh why would I use Bitcoin when this is so much better so I think those two things make Bitcoin not normal investment I'm probably not eloquent enough to delve in and give the crap answer but those two questions there are definitely very good answers as to why there are reasons that these they're not as much of a fundamental risk um well okay without without hearing the argument it's hard to debate it but but I'll just say this I'm not going to believe anybody who says government is predictable or technology is predictable yeah there's nothing you could tell me that would change my mind on that but anyway so so thanks for the question and I'm going to move on appreciate it nice to meet you thank you all right thank you let's do another one here the fool would like to come on this sounds dangerous all right fool calls himself a fool uh um it looks like we got a technology problem on that one oh unmute your uh microphone fool and ask me your question hey Scott you hear me yes again what's your question on fentanyl right uh yes this year correct so I think in Prior You.

Tubes or podcasts or spaces or whatever you said you haven't like used your entire I would say persuasive ability is that still a thing on Sentinel yeah well the the entire Republican primary group wants to militarily attack the cartels so I think maybe I'm doing okay is are you doing it on purpose are you using your force all right uh yes yes okay okay let's say I'm a I'm a state voter on the transitioning of children okay which I view as like an object objective evil okay um following I would say um I was going to see if you want to join teams vice versa basically no uh if you wanted to switch over to the transitioning of children no I'm going with the numbers I don't know how many kids transition I I would I would agree with you on you know kids maybe waiting until they're adults so no argument on the issue but um you can't make your single issue to issues and and also if you want to join your team no I know um I'm saying I don't want to go from the big team to the small team how many people do you how many kids I think it's a bigger issue how many kids do you think uh transition per year oh but give me one that's one too many is it more than the 70 000 dying from fentanyl every year my guess is probably objective evil where I see the transitioning of children and as an objective evil maybe okay they're trying to make money from well I I uh I don't believe in objective evil um I believe in Saving as many people and you know keeping our lives good and keeping us safe and happy and stuff so objective evil is a sort of a frame it's more of a point of view but uh that's my persuasion Point yeah but it doesn't work on me so I don't I don't believe in evil and Free Will and stuff like that but thanks all right thanks for the question all right thanks yeah I don't I don't believe in evil uh and I guess I guess the reason I don't believe it is that it doesn't have a a use there's no usefulness for that frame there are things that you know you want to stop and there are things you know you want more of that's the end of it there's stuff you want more of there's stuff you want less of there's you don't need to give any extra words on it there's stuff you know people doing bad things people do bad things sure all right let's take another one Chris um Chris as soon as your microphone shows up here hey Chris uh on you unmute your microphone and ask me your question hey Scott hi Chris um the last question at I have a five-year-old and a seven year old what's your typical in the future of education and like colleges in the future do you think we'll exist still a few big ones the future colleges well I feel like um it's it's going to change I mean everybody can say the obvious it's just not going to look the same in 10 years the teachers union still has a solid grip so I think it comes down to money if there's enough money to build alternative school choice then it's going to happen like crazy because I think almost everybody wants the school choice at this point if they're really paying attention so if money becomes available it's going to happen like crazy and oh yeah I feel like there's going to be more of a learning specific skills and putting together a skill stack than universities I I think that the cost and the benefit of the college education is largely debunked at this point in the sense that you know if you if you could afford let's say your parents could afford to pay for your college totally it would be a nice four years of meeting people and maybe getting a little more mature and you know learning some skills would be useful but I feel like there's going to be tons of people who don't want to spend that money you don't have the extra money to spend and can just directly learn the things they need for a practical successful life so I think the AI is going to be the teacher for more and more people until it's the only teacher you know I've often said that the problem with remote learning is that all they did is put a camera in front of a regular teacher that's like the dumbest thing yeah exactly you're not getting it back right you should start from scratch and say what does this new technology do that the old one won't and one thing it does is you could put together a team of teachers for one course so you can say hey I've got a I've got a graphics expert who's going to really make this come alive visually I've got somebody who's really good at engaging a crowd you know somebody's just good at talking in front of people and people want to watch that person maybe they're good looking too and then you know somebody to write the plan so it's compatible with you know what your future needs are and it's it's just the right lessons but you would put a team together including maybe a director and a producer you know almost a Hollywood model and then you compete with the other little clips of you know AI is teaching other things and you just let the market decide which is the right one so so my my general take is that online learning or Computer Learning is worse than 80 percent of in-person learning but the very best which has not been created yet the very best online AI teacher will be 10 times better than the best human experience but we're not there yet so I think universities will maybe the exception of the norm of academic instructor I think the university is just going to become rich people clubs you know just maybe maybe a place to get some networking going but not necessarily proving that you can code better yeah I would still be around as a as a social club basically that that says you're in the club now they uh Harvard's on the way to destroying their biggest asset because if if they're uh if they're enrolling people who are not coming from wealthy families which they're trying to do at a bigger that's a great good in many ways you know a lot lots of positive but you you're going to be networking with somebody who had a single mom and grew up in a poor City so so you have access to network with the one person the other your classmate who might be awesome might become a billionaire but but you lose the access to that one person's family which could have also been you know very connected as well so so Harvard's uh networking value should be you know dropping precipitously all right all right thanks all right how are we doing uh are people enjoying this do you want more of this all right a little more of this all right uh let's see Adam 's a good name So Adam you're going to be connected here and unmute your speaker and ask your question on your microphone Adam I can't hear you Adam might have a microphone problem all right so that didn't work let's try Patrick you look interesting unmute yours your microphone Patrick hey here I am hey what's your question Patrick um I I have a question before someone is to say I saw Greg gutfield on here and I wanted to encourage everybody to read his book The plus it's basically you can be a plus or minus in the world with every decision you make and uh it's a really really great book um my question is I remember listening to your podcast way back when in early 2020 and you you were talking about how the the media had taken this stance against hydroxychloroquine and you know what kind of a risk they were doing if it worked and uh now that uh now that everything's turned out the way it is you know I feel like them suppressing hydroxychloroquine at the time that they did basically destroyed the world and um so as I think the accountability should be first for that so Patrick in your reality yeah it seems it seems we're all in our own little realities and your reality has hydroxychloroquine been shown to be effective um and safe for uh covid I use the zelenco protocol when I got coveted in no no anecdotes no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no I'm not going to listen to an anecdote I'm not going to hear about one patient you have to answer the question do you think that science has proven the hydroxychloroquine worked no anecdotes that it's a crime against humanity that they uh they are are still denying it but but your opinion is based entirely upon your certainty that it does work that's true okay yeah I I mean I wish I could join you uh I do have um appreciation for what RFK Jr and others say that it almost looks like the tests were designed to fail absolutely they were yeah yeah but but I but I suspect that if I were to talk to the people who put those tests together they would change my mind you know I haven't done that but the the problem is every time you hear one side of anything it sounds convincing right yeah so so when somebody says I looked at that study and the the amounts are too high and was obviously designed to fail and it was not matched with zinc and all these things and they sound true or given to people late I I remember giving late right right yeah so I remember okay all of those things uh they sound like reasonably good points but I haven't heard the Counterpoint I haven't heard the people who ran the test say yes I know why you're asking the questions but there's actually a good reason for it here's why we did it maybe it would be convincing I don't know so for me it's a big uh I don't know yeah but I wouldn't rule it out I wouldn't rule it out I think that it being an Iona for for zinc and zinc stops their application of the virus the better question was how how did it not work and and one thing another thing I heard you say that I wish people pursued on is that is there anybody who used it correctly early and died anyway and you would think that there were those those would have been advertised all over the place I thought it was I thought I did hear some of those but I may have been wrong there were so many anecdotal reports that they'll run together in my mind but one of the things I was watching was to see if there was any location that completely solved their problem with hydroxychloroquine you know I thought there'd be some you know City in I don't know South America or something whether it be somebody who just won you know Hog Wild and and just eliminated their problems so I expected to see that now Africa sometimes used as an example but what percentage of Africans do you think are actually taking hydroxychloroquine it's not a big percentage it's just they used a lot there but not as a percentage of the people no I know it's a lot as a quantity but not as a percentage right so anyway okay um but thanks for the question Patrick sure right um all right um how about let's listen to uh Dr.

Hank we got a doctor in here he said what kind of doctor ob-g-y-n all right Dr.

Hank as soon as you connect uh turn off your microphone and ask your question Dr.

Hank are you there oh sorry I utterly just putting pretty space thank you all right I uh I just came in so I don't know what the conversation has been um I just got in you know I'm a I'm a physician who four years ago was a certain kind of physician and kovid has totally in my opinion ripped my blinders off and you know the topics could take all day to go through but you know one perfect example you just mentioned the hydroxychloroquine when I when covet started I'm what's called a Locum tenum doctor so I travel all around the country and um when covet started I was well hold on hold on hold on you're traveling gynecologist yes okay it's it's called Locum cannams it's basically you know you do assignments to fill in spots all around the country yeah I've been doing it full time for eight years my wife and dogs and I just are full-time gypsies now I've been doing that too but apparently I need some kind of certification you're telling me no I'm just kidding just kidding just kidding all right go ahead go ahead with your question well anyways um again I'm kind of forcing the topic I don't know really what you want to talk about whatever you want whatever you want go ahead okay whatever since you brought up hydroxy so when I during covet I've worked in six different hospitals in four different states I started in Washington outside of Seattle and if you remember the nursing home Kirkland nursing home north of Seattle was kind of the initial hot spot in the U.S and I was in this little Hospital across the Puget Sound and we were having meetings about putting up tents in the parking lot with patient beds and cots because you know we believed the initial rhetoric that this was going to be a massive um undertaking that there were going to be corpses in the street and that Seattle would fill up immediately so we wouldn't be able to fly patients to Seattle which is their normal custom there and I had also done missionary work in Africa and had been taken hydroxy for years for malarial prophylaxis so I was very familiar with it and I was heavy on I've been on heavy on Twitter for about the last eight or nine years and I was immediately connected with intensivists in Seattle and in New York City and right away those guys were talking about fauci's own paper in 2015 talking about hydroxy is a great prophylaxis for SARS one and the couple biochemists came on and physi microbiologists started talking about the mechanism which the other guy mentioned it being an ionophore and zinc has Etc and then I very quickly learned about vitamin D3 to make a long story short I got on that stuff right away you know I was very attentive to it and the day that the music died so to speak if you follow my uh Don Mc.

Lean reference was when Trump trump mentioned it and immediately it was uh basically turned into a you know Pariah I mean I had just built a prescription at a local pharmacy a couple days before and I called them after that statement and they're like we're no longer doing it and you know I'm an old fart I'm 63 and so I've been practicing since the mid 90s and that's never happened in American medicine before where pharmacists or politicians tell doctors what they can or can't do with a approved medication so yeah things just got worse you know did you have a question for me into these studies there are tons of studies no I'm not no I'm not sincere about that at all so you're here's the problem I don't believe any studies well it yeah and you know that's a true statement to a large degree I mean that is part of the problem I mean you know one of the things that I was not aware of before which is kind of a fundamental thing that I'm presuming as an informed person you're aware of and that is how much of the regulatory agencies are actually paid for by the regulated oh yeah I mean oh I'm quite aware of that yes yeah no that starts that starts always starts the discussion for people with me is that if if you start with that Financial component that has to create a um you know exactly what we saw glasses to look through right yeah exactly what we saw yeah so thanks thanks for the comments doctor okay I'm gonna make some comments after but thanks for joining yep yeah I would say you know the one thing you could say about the whole coven situation is that follow the money worked again right follow the money explain to 100 of what you saw every better there wasn't one thing that wasn't explained by follow the money so so there we are all right let's uh try Neely co-founder and CEO of distill Professor okay you look in an econ nerds so you look interesting all right Neely as soon as you connect unmute your microphone there you go hi Neely do you have a question or uh personal okay thank you you said anything yeah anything's good okay when you draw do you listen to music and if you do what are you listening to ah uh the answer is no I don't listen to music when I draw I've I've already done the thinking so the writing has already happened so I can't listen to anything when I'm writing I asked to be quiet when I draw I do like new annoys the ideal noise would be people so if I'm sitting in Starbucks I want to hear people sound or there's somebody in the house you know just even if they're just working or something just somebody around and then I do like to watch you know a show or the news or a You.

Tube or something so I do like to have some kind of entertainment on was there a deeper part of that question curious I was like you um I've always been a fan of obviously of your work as like millions and zillions of people are and I love listening and learning about how people do their craft you know for the people who do excellence and um I just thought here's an opportunity to ask you I will also say thank you you retweeted one of my tweets on the economy once and it was the most Bonkers day I've ever had in Twitter with the notifications so um also thank you thanks for answering my question all right you're welcome thanks for the question all right that was an easy one I like talking about myself I know I know all the answers what I'm talking about myself all right Paul all right Music Arts he's a mass formation disrespector and a confirm propaganda confronter all right I'm adding you as a speaker Paul as soon as your microphone is off hey there you are hi Paul hi how you doing hi Scott thanks for taking the call yeah what's your question Benjamin Owen Benjamin uh the name is familiar I don't know where where are you going with this uh I just I don't know if you're aware of him I don't see you guys interact on Twitter I didn't know if you were familiar with his work or not um but why why are you asking about him in particular what's the connection uh I'm a fan of both of your works just you know just uh being able to say the emperor has no clothes and say things that uh might be uh unpopular at the time but are true ah okay all right um I'm not trying to draw any conclusions from that that's all I'm I just was curious all right all right thanks for the question Paul all right let's uh let's hear from I probably won't pick anybody who doesn't have a profile picture so I like this uh brunella is a rebel likes wildflowers and cracking concrete perfect brunella turn off your mute and ask me a question hello no I haven't hi nice to meet you I have a strong question from Europe from Berlin who is owning black rocks and why how can be possible that the same reords fake lutein Revolution and all this type stuff that is happening in the United States is now in France and they're gonna bring it all over Europe and what's your idea about all this happening thank you did you think that was caused by a Black.

Rock was that the question I didn't say that no I I just would like to know is Black Rock we know the Vanguard the own Black.

Rock and Black.

Rock on Vanguard the problem is that there is really the hair going on in Europe and I'm sure that this is all over guys and at the moment I cannot tweet I don't know why but I can go in spaces and they're not answering to me why we have a different contract of Twitter in Europe respect to other countries and I think they're trying to silence us very badly so we're trying to fight to see really what's going on so we use the space to have these answers and we all know that I don't know if you've never had a chance to see Monopoly the video it's really interesting I showed up all behind these things we zoning really everything is actually black rocks and now we are trying just to find out what the heck is happening guys because Black.

Rock is only North Russia so what's the game you know well well um I'll take my best shot at that question thank you so much I'd be surprised if Black.

Rock had anything to do with the riots per se um I don't see the connection there but um it seems like the riots in Europe are just immigration related there's no mystery there is there and that's that's something that people should know and we try to share this message guys know about immigrant at all is really the full population that is upset they arrest 3 000 people almost about what what is the issue I thought the people who were actually burning things are the immigrants are they not well they're using immigrants as a tool you know because of course they don't want to show that the people are against what's they're taking all our rights away one by one very slowly and it starts of course with a pension and start with the yellow vest they're taking the Farmland away the you know what's happening with the energy guys uh we don't have in Germany energy anymore so the the companies are closing down people start to fight for their rights but they want to play the game of giving the fall to the immigration that's why they let so much people leave Africa and go all over Europe and create this kind of fake emergency with the immigrants the truth is that they want to play this card to cheat to to fake the fact that the people are making Revolt from there to the militarization is already happening in France in Paris there are more than 14 000 people and they are beating everyone um who's doing all these evil plans is that the government's working with Black.

Rock or do you think Black.

Rock is doing it on its own yeah the problem is that in Europe we don't have any more area leader all our leaders Chuck Maloney check shows such check all the others they get they get elected by promising to go against this and as soon as they were elected they turned completely and they keep on following the same orders so what do you think what do you think is uh behind it all well it will be easy to say you know very often we say of course because we know that we have a lot of people from U.S you know we have military bases all over Europe so of course it's easy for us to say that there is a lot of you know infiltration also in every institution and so on we know that it's happened and is real but the truth is that we see what's happening in America so we know that also there is happening the same that means that there is a big Power with a lot of money this is pretty clear if you watch if you had the chance I will invite the people to see monopolies now my brother nothing at all but I find some answer really important answer there about the fact that there is these two only two corporations that no own everything in the planet but but do you don't you think the corporations want um capitalism and prosperity because that's what benefits them from Humanity seems that they even decide to start the population my point of view it's real I don't know that my my take is that it's unrelated they're either unrelated or barely related events there's just a lot of stuff is happening some of it is just excess energy after the after the pandemic I always assumed that there would be some release of energy that had been you know tamped down too long and it would sort of look like this so I feel like there's a big upheaval that just had to happen but it's just coming out of a lot of different windows and doors and for different reasons just too much energy I don't see that there's any large corporate entity who's whose well-being depends on a stable world with lots of people buying stuff I can't see them wanting to cause instability so capitalists almost always wants stability over instability so if somebody is creating instability that would only make sense for a specific industry such as defense which I do think happens I do think the defense industry creates an instability to sell sell weapons but outside of the defense industry I can't see Black.

Rock wanting instability that would be outside of every economic understanding in the world but thanks for the comments thank you all right how about one more one more yeah for that let's get Kathleen she's got a cat for a picture Kathleen you were being selected because your your profile picture is a cat what's your question Kathleen I'm good thanks what's your question for me I have a question regarding your one as a statement and that you're such a pillar of light um in this crazy world that we're in and you're really on to um food being linked to a lot of the problems that we have in our world today and my question is is have you ever heard of the western A price foundation no my next question will be will you ever check it out I I I I was thinking there might be some kind of follow-up to that so the the answer so far is no I'm not going to follow up because you've given you've given me no reason to follow up what it what is it why do I care about it well they do they tell you the truth about food and uh there was a dentist back in the 30s and he self-funded a study his name was Weston West in a price that's the foundation name he's helped funded a study where he uh went into 14 different cultures that were remote from modern day living and found uh he he was a dentist and he his patients were experiencing all kinds of health problems whether it be cancer or bad dental problems and uh you know just a lot of health health problems and so he did some research and found over a 10-year period that there were common denominators not all the same but that they had traditional food preparation and fermentation and you know I I think we're well beyond the point where we need to prove it it seemed like a hundred percent of every study ever done shows that our current food source is bad for us and you know there's there's better ways to eat so uh yeah I think I'm so sold on that point of view that extra extra selling isn't necessary in my case but that might be something that other people are interested in so thanks for the call Kathleen hey thanks for taking my call all right I appreciate it we're gonna do for today I think we've done it all deep dive in this you'll be pleasantly surprised um Michael schellenberger did a is it on video that might be interested I'm like a parent to you how old are you I'm old enough to be most of your parents all right I'm going to turn off uh spaces thanks for joining all right yo it's interesting how many um well I'm not going to go there did anybody have the the feeling that the last thing you wanted to talk about is covid like it just it just hurts at this point it's just painful isn't it because there's nothing left to say there's just nothing left to say tomorrow somebody's gonna say oh there's my new study that the shots killed you dead and then the day later it'll be another one that says the opposite and we don't we won't know anything so um can you remind me the name Eric Dyson what's his name the scientists the era is it Eric why I have part of his name wrong right he's a three Freeman wait what's his name no Dyson Dyson Neil Degrassi Dyson right Tyson Degrassi well okay why can't we get his name right I don't know why this is why is this happening you all know his name and you're telling me like Michael Eric all right somebody somebody Neil Degrassi Tyson all right thank you so he was on yesterday and he was talking to Erica who's the who's the podcaster you keep telling me to pay attention to Medi or somebody what's the name of his um Erica who do you keep telling Hassan you know the podcaster you you sent to me all right Maddie is on I think that's correct so many Assad had a podcast with um foreign why can't I remember his name there's something weird about his name that makes it impossible to remember for me anyway so here's here's what's interesting about that I was listening to it yesterday as I was floating in my pool and the conversation was about um you know the pandemic and the vaccinations and stuff and I thought that uh that whoever he is I'm going to say the scientist on The podcaster okay let me confess I don't know both of their names correctly and I'm not going to learn it here so one of them is a scientist there's a podcaster you know who I'm talking about but uh the scientist uh I thought gave the podcaster a good spanking on the um the benefits of the vaccination this is not me speaking this is not me how many of you how many of you think I just gave you my opinion didn't happen there were no opinions here I'm saying that as a debate uh Tyson one hard and it was very interesting I'll tell you I'll tell you where the holes were that he pushed through number one is you know why would you take a experimental vaccination and then Tyson would say experimental it was tested and then the podcaster would say it wasn't tested and then he would say it was tested it was definitely tested and then the podcast would say but you know how do you know if you tested it for nine months how do you know that in five years you're not going to get a problem and then the scientist says well that's that's actually a risk yes you but how do you know you wouldn't get a long coveted or how do you know that the virus itself wouldn't give you a problem in five years so watching watching them fill in each other's holes of logic here was actually really interesting now of course there's no conclusion so when I say that the scientist won the argument um I'm saying that he didn't say anything that's not you know logical and smart so here let me give you his argument um so the podcaster says the vaccinations did not stop the transmission do you know what the answer to that is the vaccinations did not stop the transmission which we all know to be true but do you know what the response is how many of you know what the response to that is just even know what they say in response to they being the scientists do you know here's the response that when the original the original virus was out there the original vaccination did in fact stop its transmission but that lasted you know like no time at all because it because it mutated so when Tyson says they told you it would stop the transmission they were right for a while but that while didn't last long is he wrong he's probably I don't think he's wrong I think it did stop if you had the exact shot with the exact variant it would stop it cold but that didn't last so both of them had trouble accepting the other's point which is sort of what I say I I see people having trouble saying it totally worked for 10 minutes people want to say it didn't work or they wouldn't say it worked Tyson's the only one who says it accurately it totally worked for 10 minutes and it worked a little bit for the next variant but not much and then after that it was useless so I believe that's the accurate answer it worked perfectly for 10 minutes but it's also true that everybody knew it would only last 10 minutes yeah I'm exaggerating with the 10 minutes yeah then the and then the other part that Tyson got right is that you're not just taking an experimental vaccination you're taking a chance of the vaccination that was designed to help you versus a virus that was actually designed to hurt you who knows which of those is more dangerous I don't don't know it all so anyway so I thought he did a real good job of explaining that stuff um then the part that he didn't do well on is Tyson was saying uh oh so so the podcaster says what about this documentary of all these young athletes dropping dead Tyson was not aware that that's not true that that's been widely debunked just the data is bad but the podcaster got to present that to the public like it was true now here's what Tyson said even if it is true which was a mistake because it was very untrue he said even if it is true let's say 10 10 000 people dropped dead from the shot but they think it saved 10 million and here's what the podcasters should have said but didn't you already know where this is going right here's where that should have gone the podcaster should have said but the people the people under a certain age had basically zero risk but the vaccination was a risk so he should have bifurcated it and said whoa whoa the old people maybe young people it's a whole different situation so the the trouble is everybody's this is a Greg Gutfeld thing you know the prison of two ideas if you're sold that the vaccinations work or you're sold that they didn't work at all it's just so hard for you to say that the other side is a little bit right it's just so hard but you should yeah it's definitely a little bit right that we don't know the five-year implications of the shots right it's definitely a little bit right or 100 right and it's a hundred percent right that you don't know what the risk of the covet itself and you hope that maybe the shot in some cases reduced your chance of long covet but you don't know there's no way to know even if it's real long covet all right that's all for now bye on You.

Tube

foreign

good morning everybody and welcome to

the highlight of human civilization

and as you know and I'm sure you do know

this by now

the rest of the media is going to be

boring and repetitive today but not us

we got some stuff to talk about after

the simultaneous hip and maybe maybe

stay tuned I'll do a spaces live at the

same time so you can you can multitask

but first

how would you like to take your

experience up to levels that nobody's

ever seen before well all you need is a

cover of mug or a glass of tanker

jealous of style and the canteen

geographlask of vessel of any kind fill

it with your favorite liquid I like

coffee and join me now for the

unparalleled pleasure the dope be new of

the day the thing that makes everything

better it's called the simultaneous sip

and it happens now go

ah

now in case you're new to this live

stream the proper way to consume it

there are two ways possibly three

number one goes excellent with exercise

if you're running on the beach for

example hey Joel

or if for example

you were sipping coffee and had a

blanket on you in the morning and a dog

or a cat on your lap

if you've got a dog or a cat with you

and you're sipping a beverage and

listening to this you're the happiest

person in the world so keep doing what

you're doing

all right here's the news let's start

with some semi-fake news uh this is Fox

Fox News has some semi fake news the

headline says White House reports

signals uh wait White House yeah White

House report signals openness to

manipulating sunlight to prevent climate

change

do you think that's a true story

that the White House has signaled an

openness

to block the Sun

well what does openness mean

wouldn't you and if you read this

wouldn't you assume that they were kind

of serious about blocking the Sun

a little bit stop that climate change

do you think that the details of the

story will support this headline

of course not

no they're they're studying it

the only thing that the only thing

they're open to is studying it

being open to look into something is

very different than being open to doing

it

you wouldn't study it if you thought it

was a good idea

I mean if if you were sure it was so

they're just as uncertain As You Are

but they're looking at it

do you think it's impossible that they

could come up with

some kind of temporary thing that would

seed the clouds or whatever they need to

do and and still not be dangerous

well potentially

you know obviously you have to worry if

they do it wrong it's the end of human

civilization

so there's that

but now I wouldn't worry about it I

think it's just one of those two on the

nose

the White House wants to block out the

sun to change climate change that's a

little

a little too on the news I think maybe

they're just studying it because they

study everything

somebody's got an idea let's go study

that that doesn't mean anything

all right uh you know that there is a

massive protest in France that are

ongoing

uh Trump weighed in on that

he said I wouldn't go to France France

is no longer France

Trump actually said he wouldn't go to

France

now uh of course you know that the

the riots are over the shooting of a

Young Man

I think from Northern Africa Muslim I

think but

I'm not even sure that's the reason

people are are writing you know that's

the that's the excuse but of course

there are bigger issues

now some of the writers

probably want to take over the country

and make it in an Islamic country

reasonable you'd expect that they'd want

that

um and some of them were probably just

having fun and causing trouble and

looting and it's probably people have

all kinds of different reasons or

they're just mad about white people or

whatever they're doing

but here's how many of you would know

the percentage of Muslim population in

France don't look it up don't look it up

don't Google it the percentage of their

population that's Muslim right now

what do you think

some of you know the right answer is not

25 but I can see why you'd be guessing

that but no it's not 25. it's about 10

about 10 percent

um what is the percent of Muslim

uh residents of the United States Muslim

residents of the United States what

percent

one percent one percent so Fred says 10

times the amount of Muslim population

and they're and that's the population

that seems to be the most worked up at

the moment you know it was some time ago

I don't remember who said it

it was a there was a percentage of

Muslim population

that would guarantee you became Muslim

that the entire country would eventually

become Muslim do you remember what that

number was

it was 10 percent

I think if he had 10 you end up going

Muslim and

uh I think it has something to do with

maybe maybe you can do a fact check on

me the reasoning behind that was

uh one might be birth rate

there's a higher birth rate

but the the other might be that

um

that's just that's just the percentage

that they try to take power when I say

they I mean if there's any members of

the group

who think that the country should become

an Islamic rule sure yeah Sharia law if

you have 10 of your population Islamic

they're probably going to try

now the you know your point of view of

whether that's the worst thing in the

world or the best thing in the world

would probably depend if you're Muslim

so

you you can't say it would be a terrible

idea if they wanted to take over once

they got some power because that's what

everybody does everybody who has power

tries to use it so it looks like they

have power

um

tell me I'm wrong

France's re-electing president Trump

France is pretty much guaranteeing Trump

gets into office isn't he

now you know if something happened to

Toronto previous legal problems or he

self-implosed I mean there are lots of

things that could keep him out but I

don't know how America can watch France

if they're paying attention

now the other thing is that people

aren't paying attention

I I only just started paying attention I

think the the rise in France how long

have they been going on

I I just today decided to get interested

because I never expect riots to last

long

so a riot in another country doesn't

interest me they're like that's two

weeks of rioting

and then it goes away but maybe not

maybe this is bigger Belgium's got their

issues too

so

um I think the biggest the biggest thing

this does is guarantees that Trump or

somebody who's a republican gets elected

I don't know how you could watch this

and say you want to be like it

but

let me make a very important distinction

if we're bringing Christian immigrants

across the border

we would have our own different set of

challenges but it won't be this

you know the the Christians that are

coming across from Central America and

Mexico are not looking to you know

change the nature of the country

um in fact their assimilation rate is is

awesome

so here's the way I would handle it if I

were Trump

this would be really delicate I don't

know if you could get away with it I

think you should get some kind of

independent Bobby

to determine how many of what kind of

immigrants you can let in

before it changes the nature of the

country

and it could be different for different

groups

so I I would be opposed to ending you

know Muslim immigration

that doesn't I mean that seems like way

too much

but I wouldn't be opposed to having

different limits of rates of people

coming in based on how much of a

disruption you think it would be and the

Iran the amount of disruption probably

has everything to do with assimilation

rates and nothing to do with you know

genetics or anything like that it's just

there's some cultures that are designed

to assimilate

and some that are designed to resist

assimilation

in my opinion

the South American you know Central

American culture is so compatible with

American you know once you get the

language going

it pretty much is a smooth process right

somebody comes from

Australia to the United States

smooth process

New Zealand smooth process right China

not so bad

you know Asian immigrants have done an

amazing job assimilation of Asian

Americans

really good really good let's let's get

some more right how about Indian

Americans assimilation

excellent excellent let's have some more

but the Islamic is immigration is a

different animal because the Islamic

system will kill you if you leave it

so that's that's an anti-assimilation

philosophy

so if you bring people in who have a

assimilation or at least they don't mind

you know they're not opposed to it

you can assume that's going to go

smoothly in the long run

if you bring a group in who's stated

philosophy and religion is no we don't

assimilate you assimilate to us

what do you expect

but even then I would I would make sure

that you you know I'd make sure that

we're bringing in people from everywhere

because it's good in the long run you

just got to make sure your rates

and your numbers make sense

for the philosophy of the people you're

bringing in right

so that's what I think I think uh Trump

or Rama Swami could sell the hell out of

that

um

sure

um what do you think is going to happen

in France

does it look to you like this is just

gonna get bigger and bigger until it's

on the end

or do you think there'll be some kind of

France first movement will there be a

trump you know Marie Le Pen or something

will there be a trump-like character

that rises there

you know what I heard I I heard that uh

brexit is unpopular in Great Britain

is that true give me a fact check on

that that there are more people in

Britain who wish they had not done

brexit is that true

yeah I don't know if that's true

I read that but

um

yeah yeah then the the Muslim population

would be uh not too compatible with the

woke population

so that's an issue

all right but it does make you like

Muslims better probably

it's a very pro-muslim

um

kind of theme

that they're against many of the same

things that many of you are against so

at least you have common enemies that's

something

all right

um

Twitter of course is having some issues

today and it is just weird watching

people flip out about it

does it really matter that much if

Twitter has some glitches

is that is that affecting us a lot I

mean

I don't know I mean I experienced some

little irregularities yesterday but how

much did it affect your life I mean not

much on a weekend and it's a weekend how

much did you really need it

but anyway I was looking at some of the

the takes uh here's the dumbest take

I'm not even going to tell you who it

was it's just somebody on Twitter who

decided to say this in public

that Elon Musk has experience running

Twitter is proof that rich people

shouldn't run companies

laughs

how drunk do you have to be to tweet

that

that's right the problems through

Twitter are more proof that rich people

like Elon Musk should not be involved in

business

somebody actually wrote that

that was like a real tweet from a real

person who thought that I got a point

here I've got a good point Watch the

watch the retweets rack up on this one

wow

wow

all right but here's one that's uh more

puzzling and it's puzzling because the

person who's saying it is so smart

which is always kind of messes with my

mind I'm used to you know I'm very

accustomed to disagreeing with stupid

people

aren't we all disagreeing with somebody

who's stupid it's pretty easy and

comfortable and you're probably glad you

did it

but what happens when you agree with

somebody who's really smart

doesn't that give you a little pause or

you disagree with them

shouldn't you take a step back and say

maybe

here's one of those

so Professor Scott Galloway was

retweeting his own tweet from I think uh

right around after musk had purchased

Twitter and Professor Galloway was

saying that recent events and I think he

means the the Twitter technical problems

are happening right now I think that was

more evidence that he was right

when he said right after the Takeover

um that that Moss is sort of a cult of

personality and his net wealth will be

cut in half

or could be cut in half because of the

Twitter purchase

um is it Elon Musk still the richest

person in the world

am I wrong

you're still the richest person in the

world isn't he

I believe he is

did his wealth get cut in half

I don't recall that happening no

um so that prediction hasn't come

through

but uh during so Professor Galloway said

this during a conversation with CNN's

Christian Amanpour and Amanpour said

that musk is quote unraveling before our

eyes right now this is two years ago

so like or when did you buy it was it a

year ago time is I've lost me sense of

time but whatever it was that musk uh

bought Twitter do you think musk is

unraveling before her eyes

when did that happen

when was this alleged unraveling

he said one of the best years at any

business person has ever had in the

history of business

he's unraveling right between so

here's what I tweeted when did musk say

he bought Twitter to make money

was there ever one time the Elon Musk

even hinted

that Twitter was a good investment and

that's why you bought it no he's always

said the opposite he directly says the

opposite you wouldn't buy Twitter to

make money

you just wouldn't do that

so why is that even a metric

he bought it for saving free speech did

he did he succeed at saving free speech

I say yes

I say yes I would say that Twitter is

the only place you can have free speech

right now

am I wrong about that I don't believe

there's a second place what's the second

place you go to for your free speech

name it name your second place

well gab okay yeah there's some friends

when I won't say Fringe there's some

alternative entities that are you know

too small to be meaningful at the point

yeah Rumble Rumble I'll give you Rumble

you know within within bounds I mean

Rumbles

got constraints as well

Dilbert dilber reborn is one place you

can get free speech but that only

applies to me apparently I'm the only

one who has it and that's only because

it's beyond a subscription wall

anyway

um I was fascinated because

I don't understand the attack on on Musk

from Scott Galloway

so I feel like he's he's judging him on

a standard that doesn't fit the

situation

If he if he said I'm going to try to

make money with this and then failed I'd

agree with them you said the opposite

though

all right

uh there's another mass shooting and I

don't know Baltimore

uh

28 people were injured

two of them died 20 walked into

hospitals

I don't even know what to say about it

anymore

what do you say about it anymore I mean

now it's just business as usual isn't it

so

do you think this is a gun problem

is it a gun problem

I would say this is a

people living in dangerous places

problem

because isn't there a higher gun well

let me ask a question isn't there a

higher gun ownership rate in the in this

in the country

than in the cities

you know per person aren't there way

more guns in the country

oh did I lose out

um looks like I lost sound

so I'm going to have to find another

microphone for my hold on hold on

I think I have another microphone

[Music]

I'll be back in a moment

how about now

um

there we go

sorry I forgot to

fix it the first time no the uh the

light didn't come on the first time so

it wouldn't have stayed

it only stayed up for a second because

the battery was dead

but we're all good now aren't we

all right thanks for telling me

so yeah there's not much to say about

the mass shooting except uh

people should move out of those areas if

they can

so if you want to be where you're you

have a low chance of being shot

you should go where there's a low chance

of being shot

which ironically is probably where there

are more guns in the country

all right let's talk about Ukraine so I

was reading all the social media about

Ukraine and here's what we know about

the the counter-offensive uh there's one

of three things happening in Ukraine and

I'm pretty sure about this all right

it's hard to be certain about things in

the Ukraine but finally I have certainty

there's one or three things happening

with the Ukrainian trying to break

through they're either having no

progress whatsoever

or they're breaking through in a small

way

or they've made major gains

so it's one of those three things I'm

sure of it I'm sure of it yeah so the

reporting on Ukraine is absolutely

useless

so they're they're either successfully

probing for weaknesses and any moment

they're going to run through with their

entire Army

so it's really going well

or or they've made no progress

whatsoever and it's a big old

slaughterhouse

it's one of those two things I'm sure of

it by the way

have you seen progosian lately

does anybody have a picture of him on

his balcony or you know walking with his

dog in Belarus

he's probably with your dog you know

your dog that your kid's thing died but

really went to Belarus to live the rest

of his life in for eternity he might

have one of those

well here's my theory here's my theory

about progression and if you look at the

fact that he hasn't been seen at all

I feel like there's only one

one conclusion

he's been abducted by the UFOs

now the UFOs we've also not got good

pictures of

so

that would be the perfect place for him

to hide because we just can't find the

UFOs so if he could get on a UFO

that might be the best way to stay away

from Putin plus he'd have access to all

that advanced technology

you know what's interesting

um

you know if you want to be mad at your

American government if you're American

here's another thing to be bad at

we have all of these UFOs which means by

now of course we've reversed engineered

their technology and we won't give that

technology to to Ukraine who desperately

deserves it

can you believe it we have all this

Advanced to alien technology and we

don't give any of it to zelenski we're

like no we're only going to give you

their Earthly stuff

how would you like some Earthling

weapons

and he's like Earthling weapons you're

giving me the weak stuff no I want this

stuff from Centauri Prime no no no you

can't have the stuff from said Tory

bribe no no we're saving that for us

but we've got a lot of Earthly Goods

that you know will get you all killed

but if you could have that

you could have all of it yeah that's

right the UFOs have progosian

yes they do and you know what the uh the

UFOs uh have as a weapon

do you know what their main weapon of of

the UFOs is

because we know that now

it's a secret Sonic weapon that they

mostly embassies

this is sort of the embassy secret Sonic

Centauri Prime

kind of a weapon

all right there's no real news today I'm

doing the best I can I'm doing the best

I can with a slow news day give me a

break

I saw David sacks uh throwing up a

little Caution that I guess Lindsey

Graham went over to

Ukraine and there's some kind of a red

line that's being drawn

that if uh

that there's a red line being drawn that

if Russia blows up a Ukrainian

specifically there's one in danger I

guess if they blow up a Ukrainian

Nuclear Power Plant

that although that's a red line and you

know maybe there'd be more escalation if

they do that now David Sachs points out

it looks like a false flag is being

created so first you create the red line

oh if you do this

then the United States will get more

into the war

and then the United States does this

themselves in other words like his Gulf

of Tonkin so so the thinking is that

maybe America and Ukraine

would blow up Ukraine's own power plant

that happens to be under the control of

the Russians right now uh as part of a

war strategy

I'm going to say no

I'm going to say no on that

here's what I think

I think the United States would sink a

boat

to start a war I think they do that

I think we would stage a false flag

attack

on maybe maybe a building or something

Maybe

I think we would do some pretty bad

stuff but I don't see us

bombing a nuclear power plant

does that really that really brings you

forward somehow you really get ahead if

you do that how in the world could that

be a good idea

so your golfer Tonkin is one ship goes

to the bottom of the ocean

it's clean you got your desks but

otherwise it's clean

but

destroyed a nuclear power plant

that would be the very worst idea that

anybody ever had for a false flag attack

I don't know if we'll ever see anybody

attack their own Nuclear Power Plant

that feels like something that just

can't happen like like nobody's mind

would ever go there

now if I'm wrong

well I guess I'm gonna have to say I'm

wrong

so and by the way there's a good chance

that that nuclear power plant will have

some explodey stuff happening and

there's a good chance we won't know who

did it so I think there's a very high

chance

some stuff could go down and we don't

know who did it but intentionally

intentionally

that's a stretch

it's something it's something to be

concerned about to look at and you know

it if it turns out that the Russians get

blamed for blowing that thing up you

could be very skeptical

and and to me I don't see why that's a

red line at all actually

if it's such a big problem that it would

be a red line

would we do it ourselves

I mean it just doesn't make sense

so I'm going to say that doesn't it

doesn't quite make sense I'm going to

bet against it

but keep an eye on it so I think David

Sachs is right to say keep an eye on

that

um I've noticed that when I make

predictions my best predictions are

things that don't exist

so you know I just gave you three of

them I told you that the secret of Sonic

weapon wasn't real the day it came out

so far we haven't found it and it looks

like it wasn't real right I told you

that when uh when the Vegas shooter was

called Isis

you know I said nope it's not Isis it

wasn't

when uh the UFO thing you know when

there was a credible sounding person who

says the United States has all these

UFOs

I said nope you're never going to see

proof of that

nope

and then when pergosian allegedly his

plane went to Belarus I said nope that

did not happen an evolution Evolution as

well right about that

so

um here's my

here's my uh summary of that it's way

easy to know what isn't true

so it looks like I'm doing better than I

am at predicting if you ask me to

predict what would happen that's really

hard

but predicting what is not real you know

that the news says is real it's actually

somewhat easy

yeah it's just too on the nose it's

always the same it's always the same

it's just two on the nose you could spot

it right away and by the way how many of

you are happy that you learned the two

on the nose trick

how many have just automatically you

know you can spot the fake news now just

right away wait oh let's do it in the

news

yeah it's like isn't it like a magic

sense it's almost like you got a sixth

sense

as soon as you can see the two on the

nose stuff you spot the fake news like

you have magic or something yeah it's a

really powerful technique

uh Scott predictions are all ego based

to appear smarter than you

hmm

is there something you do that isn't ego

based

like what uh because that was a real

smart comment

um that the predictions are ego based

well what would be uh I'm just curiosity

what would be something that a human

does that's not ego based

what would that be

yeah yeah it's a dumb comment

it's a dumb comment a hundred

percent what you do is for your selfish

or maybe your family or something but

that's selfish too

it's all for ego every bit of it

predictions aren't the one thing

I do for ego

everything I do is free go

because everything I do has something to

do with you know

making me more effective or useful in

the world

because it makes me feel good

it's it's all ego

getting rid of your ego feels really

good by the way if you can ever do it

it gives you a feeling of euphoria but

it doesn't last long that's why uh the

psychedelics are good

they remove your ego temporarily and the

reason it's euphoric is that it's so

it's such a relief because we're walking

around just managing our egos all day as

hard

but you're very lost if you think that

that there are some situations in which

ego counts and then the others don't

that's not the reality

all right

um

I had offered that uh

I would start up as spaces on Twitter

so if somebody somebody wanted to ask me

questions they can so I've got it all

fired up here does anybody want to go to

spaces and you can stay here and listen

to it or you can listen to it on Spaces

but I'm gonna hit start now

yeah we'll see if anybody comes in

all right everybody I don't know if

anybody's here yet but this will be your

opportunity to ask me any question so

raise your hand if you want to be a

person who asked me a question it could

be any topic

I don't care what it is

oh look all my friends are signing up

there

all right is anybody uh raise your hand

if you want to ask me a question could

be on anything it's a slow news day so

we're just sort of look at looking at a

reason to talk about something and enjoy

your coffee

if you're uh if you're sitting there

with your coffee and your dog on your

lap

well you're doing it right because

that's that's the vibe this weekend

dog on lap

all right uh I've got one request here

um that as a speaker

very curious

in a moment you will be a speaker

hey curious are you there

thanks for accepting my speaker request

pleasure what's your question

day Brothers go ahead

what do you think is happening with the

taste now

um do you think that he will be released

at any time

um or do you think he's definitely going

to prison and it's just kind of over for

him well your remedia is sort of a big

black box I don't think any of us know

what that situation is so this is the

perfect example that I always say that

the news about public figures is never

true it's just never true now I base

that on knowing lots of public figures

and also being in the news you know

hundreds if not thousands of times

myself and I can I can see the stories

about myself and I know if they're true

or not and then often there are people I

know personally so I can find out the

real story behind the scenes and this

never matches it just never matches and

not even close you usually there's at

least one fact that changes everything

and the public isn't aware of that fact

so with the Tay Brothers I would

summarize it this way

is Romania so I'd be I'd be amazed if

everything that's happening is by the

book

and you know non-corrupt

I just assume there's some corruption I

don't know how it plays into the story

but one assumes it's part of the story

then the other question is is there

somebody outside of Romania who is the

Puppet Master trying to get Romania to

clamp down on these guys I think the

odds of that are good

um I I don't have proof of that but it

seems like something that could happen

in our world

then that but the other wild card is

their their capabilities

the reason that you talk about them at

all is they're hyper capable they're

just really really capable at a wide

range of things you know social media

making money maybe maybe some sketchy

activities but they made them all work

yeah almost everything they did worked

so

assuming that they still have access to

lots of funds

um do you think they can bribe their way

out in time

and so you might have a situation where

you have the most probably two of the

most capable people in terms of

persuasion money social media and if

they can't get out of this nobody could

so there's a little bit of a Houdini

show going on which is two people in the

situation that no normal person could

get out of

but they're not normal people

they are the two people who had would

have the best chance of getting out of a

type of a tight spot

you know especially if it's complicated

and you know there's lots of levels to

it and you got to be a chess player but

they are that's exactly what they are

they are chess players so

I'm fascinated at the um competition if

you will

that you know the entire legal system of

Romania

versus the Tate Brothers Tay Brothers is

actually a fair fight

and I don't know which way it'll go it

honestly could go either way they could

be completely free and Vindicated

possibly or

the Romanians will you know get their

licks in

all right

um

does that answer your question I think

you're yeah thank you thank you very

much I just wanted to know your take on

it um but I'll let somebody else ask

some questions now thank you Scott all

right thanks

all right let's see uh

Javi

is it j j a v i is that Harvey or

Javi maybe you'll tell me Javi are you

there

yes how do you pronounce your name

it's uh Javi Javi okay Javi what is your

question

um which is your favorite conspiracy

conspiracy theory that actually turned

out to be true

uh well the I I guess the one that's

closest to me which is that Twitter was

in fact

um how does thumb on the scale in a

variety of ways that we still haven't

figured out

so

it always felt like it was true

and then to find that it was true was

pretty good the uh

the idea that the Democrats were behind

the Russia collusion

it took me a while to realize that that

didn't happen sort of organically

you know that there was actually just a

plot it was exactly what you thought it

was so I think musk accurately said that

it seems like all of our

all of our conspiracy theories are

coming out to be true

uh oh and on you believe everything

no my ex-wife did not hook up with

Andrew Tate

I don't know if you know this but Andrew

Tate is not reliable in terms of the

truth

all right uh

did I answer your question

I think you muted so I'm going to say

yes yes

thank you all right thanks

all right let's try somebody else here

uh Robert

all right Robert let's see if you're

ready to get on here and ask me a

question Robert

hello Robert Robert

there's a little delay with the

interface so it just it's trying to

connect but there he is

no not yet it's weird it's it's cooking

like it can't connect

so it's not Robert's fault his

technology is not working all right

well that's that's where it is still not

working

I might have to

undo that one and try somebody else

oh Ed is a speaker

all right we're having a user interface

glitch I can't add this speaker and I

can't subtract them but what happens if

I try to add somebody else

all right I'm going to try to add

somebody else

Chris

you may have successfully been added if

you unmute your microphone Chris you can

ask me a question hey Chris okay I will

I will say there's like a five second

delay

in these spaces from the the people that

are up on the stage are like five

seconds ahead of the people that are

just listening oh hmm okay

you know if you're bringing people up

one at a time like you are that that

you're going to get that my question to

you is you said something that uh rang

very true with me a 2020 election

was

non-transparent by force

and you know therefore it was

illegitimate uh I was wondering if you

might expand on that a bit

uh so that other people can understand

it because I think that very simple

thing

uh proves quite a bit right there well

by non-transparent by force I think

you're referring to one situation where

Republican observers were denied access

there were multiple but yes yeah well

you know that allows you to doubt the

election

um so I don't care what anybody tells

you did or did not happen if if you have

a right to watch and they tell you you

can't you should draw exactly the

conclusion from that

that an informed person should that

there's something going on

because if there wasn't anything going

on well maybe they'd let you see now the

the counter to that is that they're just

worried that The Observers would be

troublemakers and they were just trying

to make their life easier

Maybe

that's entirely possible

um but you can't have that situation and

also have confidence

you can have irregularities and then no

confidence but you can't have

irregularities and then confidence

uh you gotta pick so if you're gonna go

with your regularities don't ask for the

confidence and the result we can't give

you that that's logically incompatible

so I don't I don't have any evidence

that the

election was rigged

zero evidence of that that I'm aware of

uh there are lots of claims but if you

were to track all of the claims from the

beginning of the election denial claims

they're almost all wrong

now will there be some that you know pan

out I don't know maybe

anything's possible but like I always

say the the big picture is this

if you have a system that is not fully

auditable

and people have a really big incentive

to to game the system they will

yeah maybe not maybe not 2020. but

eventually

you know there's no way you can avoid it

so we have a system that attracts and

guarantees rigging I would say it

guarantees it it's designed to attract

it and guarantee it in the long run if

it were designed to avoid it it would be

designed very differently

I imagine

so that's what I think all right thanks

Chris

all right let's bring up

spring up Christopher Hill

so it'll be a little five second delay

or so all right Christopher if you

unmute

you can you can talk

skill stack regarding communication

persuasion skills and that clearly had a

lot to do with him Rising above the pack

and getting into the White House so I

guess the question is this as you look

at 2024 how much of an impact will

that's that persuasion skill sack take

or do you think that there are other

aspects of his skills that may may make

it different to 24 is it just completely

different environment

well the big question uh that's being

asked on the right is whether the

elections are designed so that the

Republican could ever win

and I don't know the answer to that I

don't know it could be that you know

between the the legal manipulations and

the ballot stuffing that persuasion just

doesn't matter anymore it could be just

who's running the better game on the

ground so it might be that it doesn't

matter the thing that was different

about Trump is that he was bringing a

new weapon into the field that nobody

recognized yeah but you know I could see

it early so that was a very special case

it's not it's not some kind of thing

where I could always guess who the next

president is going to be that was just a

one-off I just had a special uh sort of

a special Vision on a specific variable

that was gigantic and was invisible to

other people

so uh

I would think that

the first thing that's happening is that

with the little primary action going on

in the Republican side

that the best ideas are starting to be

grabbed by all the candidates

so you saw that I think most of the

candidates said they would get tough

with the military with the cartels

it's because when Trump said it

everybody said oh he got a good reaction

to that all right I guess I got to do

that too so I think you're saying um

there's going to be a lot of people

joining the best opinion

some of those best opinions were going

to come from Vivek ramaswamy and people

will probably have to just adopt them

so I I think uh I think yeah it's a

different landscape I don't think just

the a super persuasive person coming

could come in and tear things up now RFK

Jr is super persuasive uh Vivek is super

persuasive Trump is super persuasive and

I do think that they're going to move

move the uh I think those are the three

that will move the conversation the most

and already have

already have thanks for the question

all right let's take another one

uh all right uh Ronin listen you have a

good name so I'll add you

Ronan this is you connect

uh unmute your microphone and you can

ask me a question hello Ronan

hi Scott

full ask me anything

can I ask for your personal take on

bitcoin and do you hold any Bitcoin

personal takeout Bitcoin first of all

yes I hold Bitcoin

um I believe Bitcoin is a hundred

percent unpredictable

meaning that

um you don't know what the government's

going to do

and you probably never will

so you got that government risk that

hangs over it however having said that

I've recommended before that if you have

something like a portfolio

then you know maybe if you want five

percent of it to be in Bitcoin that

makes sense so I would use Bitcoin as a

diversification tool not as a singular

investment tool

that said there will be people who do

exactly the opposite of my advice and

make huge fortunes

there will be others who do the opposite

of my advice and lose huge fortunes

probably depending on their timing so

Bitcoin is a diversification play for

somebody with a normal portfolio if

you're young

if you're 25 you get a you've saved up

five thousand dollars and you just want

to like throw a bat down maybe

maybe you might get a you know you might

get a 50 gain one year and be happy you

did so if you're young and you can

absorb a small loss get a little more

aggressive I'm giving you basically the

most common

um investment advice there is right so

quick yeah

I used to be with a gentleman

strategy are you familiar with happening

I'm familiar with him yes

[Music]

talks uh one particular talk called the

Sailor Breedlove series it's very

long-winded uh it's probably a 20-part

series each part's two hours so it's not

an easy watch but it's absolutely

um fantastic but but doesn't it come

down to this so Bitcoin would do great

except for two risks one is the

government risk which cannot be

predicted and the other is a technology

risk which is either somebody can crack

it or somebody can come up with a a

better Bitcoin then everybody says oh

why would I use Bitcoin when this is so

much better so I think those two things

make Bitcoin not normal investment

I'm probably not eloquent enough to

delve in and give the crap answer but

those two questions there are definitely

very good answers as to why

there are reasons that these they're not

as much of a fundamental risk

um well okay without without hearing the

argument it's hard to debate it but but

I'll just say this I'm not going to

believe anybody who says government is

predictable or technology is predictable

yeah there's nothing you could tell me

that would change my mind on that

but anyway so so thanks for the question

and I'm going to move on appreciate it

nice to meet you thank you all right

thank you

let's do another one here

the fool would like to come on

this sounds dangerous all right fool

calls himself a fool

uh

um it looks like we got a technology

problem on that one oh unmute your uh

microphone fool and ask me your question

hey Scott you hear me yes again what's

your question

on fentanyl right

uh yes this year correct so I think in

Prior YouTubes or podcasts or spaces or

whatever you said you haven't like used

your entire I would say persuasive

ability

is that still a thing

on Sentinel

yeah well the the entire Republican

primary group wants to militarily attack

the cartels so

I think maybe I'm doing okay

is are you doing it on purpose are you

using your force all right uh yes yes

okay

okay

let's say I'm a

I'm a state voter on the transitioning

of children okay which I view as like an

object objective evil okay

um following I would say

um

I was going to see if you want to join

teams vice versa basically no uh

if you wanted to switch over to the

transitioning of children no I'm going

with the numbers I don't know how many

kids transition I I would I would agree

with you on you know kids maybe waiting

until they're adults so no argument on

the issue

but

um you can't make your single issue to

issues

and and also if you want to join your

team no I know um I'm saying I don't

want to go from the big team to the

small team how many people do you how

many kids I think it's a bigger issue

how many kids do you think uh transition

per year

oh but give me one that's one too many

is it more than the 70 000 dying from

fentanyl every year

my guess is probably

objective evil where I see the

transitioning of children and as an

objective evil maybe

okay they're trying to make money from

well I I uh I don't believe in objective

evil

um I believe in Saving as many people

and you know keeping our lives good and

keeping us safe and happy and stuff

so objective evil is a sort of a frame

it's more of a point of view

but uh that's my persuasion Point yeah

but it doesn't work on me so I don't I

don't believe in evil and Free Will and

stuff like that but thanks all right

thanks for the question

all right thanks

yeah I don't I don't believe in evil

uh and I guess I guess the reason I

don't believe it is that it doesn't have

a a use

there's no usefulness for that frame

there are things that you know you want

to stop and there are things you know

you want more of

that's the end of it

there's stuff you want more of there's

stuff you want less of there's you don't

need to give any extra words on it

there's stuff you know people doing bad

things

people do bad things

sure all right let's take another one

Chris

um

Chris as soon as your microphone shows

up here hey Chris uh on you unmute your

microphone and ask me your question

hey Scott

hi Chris

um

the last question at I have a

five-year-old and a seven year old

what's your typical in the future of

education and like colleges in the

future do you think we'll exist still

a few big ones the future colleges well

I feel like

um

it's it's going to change I mean

everybody can say the obvious it's just

not going to look the same in 10 years

the teachers union still has a solid

grip so I think it comes down to money

if there's enough money to build

alternative school choice then it's

going to happen like crazy

because I think almost everybody wants

the school choice at this point if

they're really paying attention

so if money becomes available it's going

to happen like crazy

and

oh

yeah I feel like

there's going to be more of a learning

specific skills and putting together a

skill stack than universities

I I think that the cost and the benefit

of the college education is largely

debunked at this point

in the sense that you know if you if you

could afford

let's say your parents could afford to

pay for your college totally

it would be a nice four years of meeting

people and maybe getting a little more

mature and you know learning some skills

would be useful but I feel like there's

going to be tons of people

who don't want to spend that money

you don't have the extra money to spend

and can just directly learn the things

they need for a practical successful

life so I think the AI is going to be

the teacher for more and more people

until it's the only teacher you know

I've often said that the problem with

remote learning is that all they did is

put a camera in front of a regular

teacher

that's like the dumbest thing yeah

exactly you're not getting it back right

you should start from scratch and say

what does this new technology do that

the old one won't and one thing it does

is you could put together a team of

teachers for one course

so you can say hey I've got a I've got a

graphics expert who's going to really

make this come alive visually I've got

somebody who's really good at engaging a

crowd you know somebody's just good at

talking in front of people and people

want to watch that person maybe they're

good looking too and then you know

somebody to write the plan so it's

compatible with you know what your

future needs are and it's it's just the

right lessons but you would put a team

together including maybe a director and

a producer you know almost a Hollywood

model and then you compete with the

other little clips of you know AI is

teaching other things and you just let

the market decide which is the right one

so so my my general take is that online

learning or Computer Learning is worse

than 80 percent of in-person learning

but the very best which has not been

created yet the very best online AI

teacher will be 10 times better than the

best human experience but we're not

there yet

so I think universities will maybe the

exception of the norm of academic

instructor I think the university is

just going to become rich people clubs

you know just maybe maybe a place to get

some networking going but not

necessarily proving that you can code

better

yeah I would still be around as a as a

social club basically that that says

you're in the club now they uh Harvard's

on the way to destroying their biggest

asset because if if they're uh if

they're enrolling people who are not

coming from wealthy families

which they're trying to do at a bigger

that's a great good in many ways you

know a lot lots of positive but you

you're going to be networking with

somebody who had a single mom and grew

up in a poor City

so so you have access to network with

the one person the other your classmate

who might be awesome might become a

billionaire but but you lose the access

to that one person's family

which could have also been you know very

connected as well so so Harvard's uh

networking value should be you know

dropping precipitously

all right all right thanks

all right how are we doing uh are people

enjoying this

do you want more of this

all right a little more of this all

right

uh let's see Adam

's a good name

So Adam you're going to be connected

here and unmute your speaker and ask

your question on your microphone

Adam I can't hear you

Adam might have a microphone problem all

right so that didn't work

let's try Patrick

you look interesting

unmute yours your microphone

Patrick

hey here I am hey what's your question

Patrick

um I I have a question before someone is

to say I saw Greg gutfield on here and I

wanted to encourage everybody to read

his book The plus it's basically you can

be a plus or minus in the world with

every decision you make and uh it's a

really really great book

um my question is I remember listening

to your podcast way back when in early

2020 and you you were talking about how

the the media had taken this stance

against hydroxychloroquine and you know

what kind of a risk they were doing if

it worked and uh now that uh

now that everything's turned out the way

it is you know I feel like them

suppressing hydroxychloroquine at the

time that they did basically destroyed

the world and um so as I think the

accountability should be first for that

so Patrick in your reality

yeah it seems it seems we're all in our

own little realities and your reality

has hydroxychloroquine been shown to be

effective

um and safe for uh covid I use the

zelenco protocol when I got coveted in

no no anecdotes no no no no no no no no

no no no no no no no no no no no no I'm

not going to listen to an anecdote I'm

not going to hear about one patient you

have to answer the question do you think

that science

has proven the hydroxychloroquine worked

no anecdotes

that it's a crime against humanity that

they uh they are are still denying it

but but your opinion is based entirely

upon your certainty that it does work

that's true okay yeah I I mean I wish I

could join you uh I do have

um

appreciation for what RFK Jr and others

say that it almost looks like the tests

were designed to fail

absolutely they were yeah yeah but but I

but I suspect that if I were to talk to

the people who put those tests together

they would change my mind

you know I haven't done that but the the

problem is every time you hear one side

of anything it sounds convincing right

yeah so so when somebody says I looked

at that study and the the amounts are

too high and was obviously designed to

fail and it was not matched with zinc

and all these things and they sound true

or given to people late I I remember

giving late right right yeah so I

remember okay all of those things uh

they sound like reasonably good points

but I haven't heard the Counterpoint I

haven't heard the people who ran the

test say yes I know why you're asking

the questions but there's actually a

good reason for it here's why we did it

maybe it would be convincing I don't

know so for me it's a big uh I don't

know

yeah but I wouldn't rule it out I

wouldn't rule it out

I think that it being an Iona for for

zinc and zinc

stops their application of the virus the

better question was how how did it not

work and and one thing another thing I

heard you say that I wish people pursued

on is that is there anybody who used it

correctly early and died anyway and you

would think that there were those those

would have been advertised all over the

place I thought it was I thought I did

hear some of those but I may have been

wrong there were so many anecdotal

reports that they'll run together in my

mind but one of the things I was

watching was to see if there was any

location that completely solved their

problem with hydroxychloroquine you know

I thought there'd be some you know City

in I don't know South America or

something whether it be somebody who

just won you know Hog Wild and and just

eliminated their problems so I expected

to see that now Africa sometimes used as

an example but what percentage of

Africans do you think are actually

taking hydroxychloroquine it's not a big

percentage it's just they used a lot

there but not as a percentage of the

people

no I know it's a lot as a quantity but

not as a percentage

right so anyway okay

um but thanks for the question Patrick

sure right

um

all right

um how about let's listen to uh Dr Hank

we got a doctor in here

he said what kind of doctor ob-g-y-n all

right

Dr Hank as soon as you connect uh turn

off your microphone and ask your

question

Dr Hank are you there

oh sorry I

utterly just putting

[Laughter]

pretty space thank you all right

I uh I just came in so I don't know what

the conversation has been

um I just got in you know I'm a I'm a

physician who four years ago was a

certain kind of physician and kovid has

totally in my opinion ripped my blinders

off and you know the topics could take

all day to go through but you know one

perfect example you just mentioned the

hydroxychloroquine when I when covet

started I'm what's called a Locum tenum

doctor so I travel all around the

country and

um when covet started I was well hold on

hold on hold on you're traveling

gynecologist

yes

okay it's it's called Locum cannams it's

basically you know you do assignments to

fill in spots all around the country

yeah I've been doing it full time for

eight years my wife and dogs and I just

are full-time gypsies now I've been

doing that too but apparently I need

some kind of certification you're

telling me

no I'm just kidding just kidding just

kidding all right go ahead go ahead with

your question

well anyways

um again I'm kind of forcing the topic I

don't know really what you want to talk

about whatever you want whatever you

want go ahead okay whatever since you

brought up hydroxy so when I during

covet I've worked in six different

hospitals in four different states I

started in Washington outside of Seattle

and if you remember the nursing home

Kirkland nursing home north of Seattle

was kind of the initial hot spot in the

U.S and I was in this little Hospital

across the Puget Sound and we were

having meetings about putting up tents

in the parking lot with patient beds and

cots

because you know we believed the initial

rhetoric that this was going to be a

massive

um undertaking that there were going to

be corpses in the street and that

Seattle would fill up immediately so we

wouldn't be able to fly patients to

Seattle which is their normal custom

there and I had also done missionary

work in Africa and had been taken

hydroxy for years for malarial

prophylaxis so I was very familiar with

it and I was heavy on I've been on heavy

on Twitter for about the last eight or

nine years and I was immediately

connected with intensivists in Seattle

and in New York City and right away

those guys were talking about fauci's

own paper in 2015 talking about hydroxy

is a great prophylaxis for SARS one and

the couple biochemists came on and physi

microbiologists started talking about

the mechanism which the other guy

mentioned it being an ionophore and zinc

has

Etc and then I very quickly learned

about vitamin D3 to make a long story

short I got on that stuff right away you

know I was very attentive to it and the

day that the music died so to speak if

you follow my uh Don McLean reference

was when Trump trump mentioned it and

immediately it was uh basically turned

into a you know Pariah I mean I had just

built a prescription at a local pharmacy

a couple days before and I called them

after that statement and they're like

we're no longer doing it and you know

I'm an old fart I'm 63 and so I've been

practicing since the mid 90s and that's

never happened in American medicine

before where pharmacists or politicians

tell doctors what they can or can't do

with a approved medication

so yeah things just got worse you know

did you have a question for me

into these studies there are tons of

studies no I'm not no I'm not sincere

about that at all so you're here's the

problem I don't believe any studies

well it yeah and you know that's a true

statement to a large degree I mean that

is part of the problem I mean you know

one of the things that I was not aware

of before which is kind of a fundamental

thing that I'm presuming as an informed

person you're aware of and that is how

much of the regulatory agencies are

actually paid for by the regulated oh

yeah I mean oh I'm quite aware of that

yes yeah no that starts that starts

always starts the discussion for people

with me is that if if you start with

that Financial component that has to

create a um you know

exactly what we saw glasses to look

through right yeah exactly what we saw

yeah so thanks thanks for the comments

doctor

okay I'm gonna make some comments after

but thanks for joining yep

yeah I would say you know the one thing

you could say about the whole coven

situation is that follow the money

worked again

right

follow the money explain to 100 of what

you saw every better there wasn't one

thing that wasn't explained by follow

the money

so

so there we are all right let's uh try

Neely

co-founder and CEO of distill Professor

okay you look in an econ nerds so you

look interesting

all right Neely as soon as you connect

unmute your microphone there you go hi

Neely do you have a question

or uh personal okay thank you you said

anything yeah anything's good okay

when you draw do you listen to music

and if you do what are you listening to

ah uh the answer is no I don't listen to

music

when I draw I've I've already done the

thinking so the writing has already

happened so I can't listen to anything

when I'm writing I asked to be quiet

when I draw I do like new annoys the

ideal noise would be people

so if I'm sitting in Starbucks I want to

hear people sound or there's somebody in

the house you know just even if they're

just working or something just somebody

around and then I do like to watch you

know a show or the news or a YouTube or

something so I do like to have some kind

of entertainment on was there a deeper

part of that question

curious I was like you um I've always

been a fan of obviously of your work as

like millions and zillions of people are

and I love listening and learning about

how people do their craft you know for

the people who do

excellence and um I just thought here's

an opportunity to ask you I will also

say thank you you retweeted one of my

tweets on the economy once and it was

the most Bonkers day I've ever had in

Twitter with the notifications so

um also thank you thanks for answering

my question all right you're welcome

thanks for the question

all right

that was an easy one I like talking

about myself I know I know all the

answers what I'm talking about myself

all right Paul

all right Music Arts

he's a mass formation disrespector and a

confirm propaganda confronter all right

I'm adding you as a speaker Paul

as soon as your microphone is off hey

there you are hi Paul hi how you doing

hi Scott thanks for taking the call yeah

what's your question

[Music]

Benjamin

Owen Benjamin uh the name is familiar

I don't know where where are you going

with this

uh I just I don't know if you're aware

of him I don't see you guys interact on

Twitter I didn't know if you were

familiar with his work or not

um but why why are you asking about him

in particular

what's the connection

uh I'm a fan of both of your works just

you know just uh being able to say the

emperor has no clothes and say things

that uh might be uh unpopular at the

time but are true

ah okay all right

um I'm not trying to draw any

conclusions from that that's all I'm I

just was curious all right all right

thanks for the question Paul

all right let's uh let's hear from I

probably won't pick anybody who doesn't

have a profile picture

so I like this uh brunella is a rebel

likes wildflowers and cracking concrete

perfect

brunella

turn off your mute and ask me a question

hello

no I haven't hi nice to meet you I have

a strong question from Europe from

Berlin who is owning black rocks

and why how can be possible that the

same reords fake lutein Revolution and

all this type stuff that is happening in

the United States is now in France and

they're gonna bring it all over Europe

and

what's your idea about all this

happening thank you did you think that

was caused by a BlackRock was that the

question

I didn't say that

no I I just would like to know is Black

Rock

we know the Vanguard the own BlackRock

and BlackRock on Vanguard the problem is

that there is really the hair going on

in Europe and I'm sure that this is all

over guys and at the moment I cannot

tweet I don't know why but I can go in

spaces and they're not answering to me

why we have a different contract of

Twitter in Europe respect to other

countries and I think they're trying to

silence us very badly so we're trying to

fight to see really what's going on so

we use the space to have these answers

and we all know that I don't know if

you've never had a chance to see

Monopoly the video

it's really interesting I showed up all

behind these things we zoning really

everything is actually black rocks and

now we are trying just to find out

what the heck is happening guys because

BlackRock is only North Russia so what's

the game you know well well

um I'll take my best shot at that

question thank you so much

I'd be surprised if BlackRock had

anything to do with the riots per se

um I don't see the connection there but

um it seems like the riots in Europe are

just immigration related there's no

mystery there is there

and that's that's

something that people should know and we

try to share this message guys

know about immigrant at all is really

the full population that is upset they

arrest 3 000 people almost about what

what is the issue I thought the people

who were actually burning things are the

immigrants are they not

well they're using immigrants as a tool

you know because of course they don't

want to show that the people are against

what's they're taking all our rights

away one by one very slowly and it

starts of course with a pension and

start with the yellow vest they're

taking the Farmland away the you know

what's happening with the energy guys uh

we don't have in Germany energy anymore

so the the companies are closing down

people start to fight for their rights

but they want to play the game of giving

the fall to the immigration that's why

they let so much people leave Africa and

go all over Europe and create this kind

of fake emergency with the immigrants

the truth is that they want to play this

card to cheat to to fake the fact that

the people are making Revolt from there

to the militarization is already

happening in France in Paris there are

more than 14

000 people and they are beating everyone

um

who's doing all these evil plans is that

the government's working with BlackRock

or do you think BlackRock is doing it on

its own yeah the problem is that in

Europe we don't have any more area

leader all our leaders Chuck Maloney

check shows such check all the others

they get they get elected by promising

to go against this and as soon as they

were elected they turned completely and

they keep on following the same orders

so what do you think what do you think

is uh behind it all

well it will be easy to say you know

very often we say of course because we

know that we have a lot of

people from U.S you know we have

military bases all over Europe so of

course it's easy for us to say that

there is a lot of you know infiltration

also in every institution and so on we

know that it's happened and is real but

the truth is that we see what's

happening in America so we know that

also there is happening the same that

means that there is a big Power with a

lot of money this is pretty clear if you

watch if you had the chance I will

invite the people to see monopolies now

my brother nothing at all but I find

some answer really important answer

there about the fact that there is these

two only two corporations that no own

everything in the planet but but do you

don't you think the corporations want

um capitalism and prosperity

because that's what benefits them

[Music]

from Humanity seems that they even

decide to start the population my point

of view it's real I don't know that my

my take is that it's unrelated they're

either unrelated or barely related

events there's just a lot of stuff is

happening some of it is just excess

energy after the after the pandemic I

always assumed that there would be some

release of energy that had been you know

tamped down too long and it would sort

of look like this so I feel like there's

a big upheaval that just had to happen

but it's just coming out of a lot of

different windows and doors and for

different reasons just too much energy I

don't see that there's any large

corporate entity

who's whose well-being depends on a

stable world with lots of people buying

stuff

I can't see them wanting to cause

instability so capitalists almost always

wants stability over instability so if

somebody is creating instability that

would only make sense for a specific

industry such as defense which I do

think happens I do think the defense

industry creates an instability to sell

sell weapons but outside of the defense

industry I can't see BlackRock wanting

instability that would be outside of

every economic

understanding in the world

but thanks for the comments

thank you

all right how about one more

one more yeah for that

let's get Kathleen she's got a cat for a

picture

Kathleen

you were being selected because your

your profile picture is a cat

what's your question Kathleen

I'm good thanks what's your question for

me

I have a question regarding your one as

a statement and that you're such a

pillar of light

um in this crazy world that we're in and

you're really on to

um food being linked to a lot of the

problems that we have in our world today

and my question is is have you ever

heard of the western A price foundation

no

my next question will be will you ever

check it out I I I I was thinking there

might be some kind of follow-up to that

so the the answer so far is no I'm not

going to follow up because you've given

you've given me no reason to follow up

what it what is it why do I care about

it

well they do they tell you the truth

about food and uh there was a dentist

back in the 30s and he self-funded a

study his name was Weston West in a

price that's the foundation name he's

helped funded a study where he uh went

into 14 different cultures that were

remote from modern day living and found

uh he he was a dentist and he his

patients were

experiencing all kinds of health

problems whether it be cancer or bad

dental problems and uh you know just a

lot of health health problems and so he

did some research and found over a

10-year period that

there were common denominators not all

the same but that they had traditional

food preparation and fermentation and

you know I I think we're well beyond the

point where we need to prove it it

seemed like a hundred percent of every

study ever done shows that our current

food source is bad for us and you know

there's there's better ways to eat so uh

yeah I think I'm so sold on that point

of view that extra extra selling isn't

necessary in my case but that might be

something that other people are

interested in so thanks for the call

Kathleen hey thanks for taking my call

all right I appreciate it

we're gonna do for today

I think we've done it all

deep dive in this you'll be pleasantly

surprised

um Michael schellenberger did a

is it on video that might be interested

I'm like a parent to you

how old are you

I'm old enough to be most of your

parents

all right I'm going to turn off uh

spaces thanks for joining

all right

yo it's interesting how many

um well

I'm not going to go there did anybody

have the the feeling that the last thing

you wanted to talk about is covid

like it just it just hurts at this point

it's just painful isn't it

because there's nothing left to say

there's just nothing left to say

tomorrow somebody's gonna say oh there's

my new study that the shots killed you

dead

and then the day later it'll be another

one that says the opposite and we don't

we won't know anything so

um can you remind me the name Eric

Dyson what's his name

the scientists

the era is it Eric why I have part of

his name wrong right he's a three

Freeman wait what's his name

no Dyson Dyson

Neil Degrassi Dyson right

Tyson Degrassi well okay why can't we

get his name right I don't know why this

is why is this happening you all know

his name and you're telling me like

Michael Eric all right somebody somebody

Neil Degrassi Tyson all right thank you

so he was on yesterday and he was

talking to Erica who's the who's the

podcaster you keep telling me to pay

attention to

Medi or somebody what's the name of his

um Erica

who do you keep telling Hassan

you know the podcaster you you sent to

me

all right

Maddie is on I think that's correct so

many Assad had a podcast with

um

foreign

why can't I remember his name there's

something weird about his name that

makes it impossible to remember for me

anyway so here's

here's what's interesting about that I

was listening to it yesterday as I was

floating in my pool

and the conversation was about

um you know the pandemic and the

vaccinations and stuff and I thought

that uh

that

whoever he is I'm going to say the

scientist on The podcaster okay let me

confess I don't know both of their names

correctly and I'm not going to learn it

here

so one of them is a scientist there's a

podcaster you know who I'm talking about

but uh the scientist uh

I thought gave the podcaster a good

spanking on the

um the benefits of the vaccination this

is not me speaking this is not me

how many of you how many of you think I

just gave you my opinion didn't happen

there were no opinions here I'm saying

that as a debate

uh Tyson one hard

and it was very interesting I'll tell

you I'll tell you where the holes were

that he pushed through

number one is you know why would you

take a experimental vaccination

and then Tyson would say

experimental it was tested

and then the podcaster would say it

wasn't tested

and then he would say it was tested

it was definitely tested and then the

podcast would say but

you know how do you know if you tested

it for nine months how do you know that

in five years you're not going to get a

problem

and then the scientist says

well that's that's actually a risk yes

you but how do you know you wouldn't get

a long coveted or how do you know that

the virus itself wouldn't give you a

problem in five years so watching

watching them

fill in each other's holes of logic here

was actually really interesting now of

course there's no conclusion so when I

say that the scientist won the argument

um

I'm saying that he didn't say anything

that's not you know logical and smart so

here let me give you his argument

um so the podcaster says

the vaccinations did not stop the

transmission do you know what the answer

to that is the vaccinations did not stop

the transmission which we all know to be

true

but do you know what the response is how

many of you know what the response to

that is just even know what they say in

response to they being the scientists do

you know

here's the response

that

when the original the original virus was

out there the original vaccination did

in fact stop its transmission

but that lasted you know like no time at

all because it because it mutated

so when Tyson says they told you it

would stop the transmission they were

right

for a while but that while didn't last

long

is he wrong

he's probably I don't think he's wrong

I think it did stop if you had the exact

shot with the exact variant it would

stop it cold but that didn't last

so both of them had trouble accepting

the other's point which is sort of what

I say

I I see people having trouble saying it

totally worked for 10 minutes

people want to say it didn't work or

they wouldn't say it worked Tyson's the

only one who says it accurately it

totally worked for 10 minutes

and it worked a little bit for the next

variant but not much

and then after that it was useless

so

I believe that's the accurate answer

it worked perfectly for 10 minutes

but it's also true that everybody knew

it would only last 10 minutes

yeah I'm exaggerating with the 10

minutes

yeah then the and then the other part

that Tyson got right is that you're not

just taking an experimental vaccination

you're taking a chance of the

vaccination that was designed to help

you versus a virus that was actually

designed to hurt you

who knows which of those is more

dangerous I don't

don't know it all

so anyway so I thought he did a real

good job of explaining that stuff

um then the part that he didn't do well

on

is Tyson was saying uh oh so so the

podcaster says what about this

documentary

of all these young athletes dropping

dead

Tyson was not aware that that's not true

that that's been widely debunked just

the data is bad

but the podcaster got to present that to

the public like it was true

now here's what Tyson said even if it is

true which was a mistake because it was

very untrue he said even if it is true

let's say 10 10 000 people dropped dead

from the shot

but they think it saved 10 million

and here's what the podcasters should

have said but didn't

you already know where this is going

right here's where that should have gone

the podcaster should have said

but the people the people under a

certain age had basically zero risk

but the vaccination was a risk

so he should have bifurcated it and said

whoa whoa the old people maybe young

people it's a whole different situation

so the the trouble is everybody's this

is a Greg Gutfeld thing you know the

prison of two ideas if you're sold that

the vaccinations work

or you're sold that they didn't work at

all it's just so hard for you to say

that the other side is a little bit

right it's just so hard

but you should

yeah it's definitely a little bit right

that we don't know the five-year

implications of the shots right it's

definitely a little bit right or 100

right

and it's a hundred percent right that

you don't know what the risk of the

covet itself and you hope that maybe the

shot in some cases reduced your chance

of long covet but you don't know there's

no way to know even if it's real long

covet all right that's all for now bye

on YouTube