Episode 1462 Scott Adams - Things in the Headlines That Make me Laugh and Cry
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com Content: ----------- - Megan Rappinow & the Olympics - Jim Acosta tries to brand Governor DeSantis - Under-appreciated therapeutics? - COVID: No strategy & not tracking the right stuff - Stats for the different vaccines? - Mask data from the field vs data from a lab ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Morning. It's time for Coffee with Scott Adams once again, the best part of your day. It never fails. And is everybody ready? Are you prepared? Because you don't want to go into this without preparation. That would
View segment →be insanity. All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tankard, a thermos, a canteen, a drink container, a flesh vessel. Again, any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes, well, everythi…
View segment →st theme song ever? So cruel. You're so cruel. Well, here's my favorite story of the day. A Saudi prince had 80 falcons that he wanted to relocate or possibly take on vacation. The story's a little unclear. But he bought airplane seats for all 80 of his falcons. Now of course they were tied to litt…
View segment →anicotti tweeted about my story about the 80 falcons in the plane and he said, imagine being a bird that died in a plane crash. That would be the worst way to go if you were a bird. You know, if I were not inside this plane, things would be going pretty, pretty well for me. That's Larry David saying…
View segment →ning ceremonies were the lowest viewership since 1988. Now it's not just a story that there were fewer advertisers, but at some point the advertising is not enough to support the event. And I think we're pretty close if not already there. So there's a really very real chance that Megan Rapinoe legi…
View segment →story, if you don't know, is that Lionel Messi was always told he was too small, literally too short to play professional soccer. And he went from too short to play to the best player in the world in the biggest sport. Here's the tragic part. Where he's lived for 21 years — I think he was playing f…
View segment →hered me the most. Here's a story that I made a little note to myself that this almost made me cry. But that's not true. It actually made me cry. I saw a couple of people on Twitter today giving me some at least partial credit in one case for helping somebody quit drinking. Ed Latimore was mentione…
View segment →cy reasons even though they tweeted it. It's not my business to tell you their names. Another one said that as of today he was going to stop drinking 10 beers a day, which he'd been drinking forever. And today is the day that he's going to stop drinking 10 beers a day. Now that's pretty tough. Prett…
View segment →should call the next variant the DeSantis variant. Wow. Zing. Zing. You know who taught Jim Acosta this technique? Who taught Jim Acosta to cleverly brand people to make their political careers less successful? Who was it? I'm getting an image. Somebody orange. Somebody that Jim Acosta doesn't like…
View segment →agine that he would have come up with let's call it the DeSantis variant. It's just too lame because the words sound a little too technical or something. They just don't have that populist punch. But CNN's playbook looks like this. Here's a thing they like to do. They like to identify a top GOP con…
View segment →hat's quote worthy. In this case Acosta. So CNN becomes the news instead of the reporter of the news. That's right. CNN makes themselves the news and then they report on it. So basically they're manufacturing news. So it's not really fake news. It's more like manufactured news. Roly-Poly sent me so…
View segment →w that's in the way. It's goodbye. It's gone. I don't believe for a second that Trump was affected by big pharma wanting not to have therapeutics look good. I just don't think for a minute that affected him. If it had been a different president, maybe. Maybe. But I just don't see it affecting Trump…
View segment →ted of the deaths and how many were unvaccinated and then you also knew what percentage of the country or the state was vaccinated, you'd have everything you needed, right? So yes Mark's point is good and you should all be aware of it. That's why I say it all the time. If everybody's vaccinated the…
View segment →e working. In other words where there are masks you can measure that there's more of a benefit. Now is any of that data accurate? Who knows? We're in a world where you can't trust anything. You can't trust that the masks work. You can't trust that they don't work. You definitely can't trust a labor…
View segment →news I haven't heard before so I'm just seeing it in a comment on Locals that there might be some new news on ivermectin. All right. Is there anything I missed? I said Viva and Barnes. I'm going to look at your comments here for a moment. Cori Bush. Yeah I don't have much to say about her. I know…
View segment →like you get a girl like Christina? You know you're not the first person to ask. But why isn't anybody asking how a girl like Christina got a great guy like me? Could it be my looks? Could be. All right that's about all I got for today and I will talk to you tomorrow.
View segment →Morning. It's time for Coffee with Scott Adams once again, the best part of your day. It never fails. And is everybody ready? Are you prepared? Because you don't want to go into this without preparation. That would be insanity.
All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tankard, a thermos, a canteen, a drink container, a flesh vessel. Again, any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes, well, everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. It happens now.
Who says I have the worst theme song ever? So cruel. You're so cruel.
Well, here's my favorite story of the day. A Saudi prince had 80 falcons that he wanted to relocate or possibly take on vacation. The story's a little unclear. But he bought airplane seats for all 80 of his falcons. Now of course they were tied to little stands so the falcons couldn't fly around inside the plane.
But here's a question I ask. Suppose the plane lost its engines but the falcons, feeling that the plane was going down, all started flapping in unison. Could they lift the plane? No, of course not. Not only because they're not strong enough, but they're inside the plane and so all of their actions would be confined to inside, so it wouldn't really work.
But do you know how jokes work? Yeah, this isn't about the joke. It's about the mechanism for a joke. Here's what makes a joke funny: something that your brain feels makes sense but also knows it doesn't. That's a joke. When there's something about the situation that sort of kind of makes sense, but the rest of your brain says no it doesn't, no it doesn't. But you can't get it out of your head. The two of them live there at the same time and that causes a little reflex called laugh.
Here's a better joke about that. Rocky Manicotti tweeted about my story about the 80 falcons in the plane and he said, imagine being a bird that died in a plane crash. That would be the worst way to go if you were a bird. You know, if I were not inside this plane, things would be going pretty, pretty well for me. That's Larry David saying "pretty, pretty well." So I'll just start with that.
Meanwhile, in the law of unintended consequences — I need a sting for that too — the law of unintended consequences. So Megan Rapinoe wanted to show her concern for people in this country who are less fortunate and/or in worse circumstances. And so she has become sort of the face of the professional kneelers, the people who are kneeling when the anthem is played or the flag is shown.
And of course her intention — I can't read her mind, but it seems that her intention was to make the world a better place, to make it more fair. I'm seeing a funny picture of Megan Rapinoe conflated with Joe Biden's face. That's pretty funny. And she intended to make the world a little bit kinder, a little bit nicer.
Here's what she actually did. NBC's prime time coverage of the Tokyo Olympics was down 49% compared to the equivalent night in 2016 and 53% less than the 2012 London Olympics. And the opening ceremonies were the lowest viewership since 1988.
Now it's not just a story that there were fewer advertisers, but at some point the advertising is not enough to support the event. And I think we're pretty close if not already there. So there's a really very real chance that Megan Rapinoe legitimately intended just to make the world a kinder, nicer place that's more welcoming and fair for everyone. And what she did was destroy the Olympics. Destroyed the Olympics.
So Megan, we call that an own goal. That's the official name for that. That's an own goal.
Speaking of own goals, of all the news today, the thing that bothered me the most was Lionel Messi. If you don't follow soccer, especially international soccer, you may not know who Lionel Messi is. But consider that soccer is the most important sport in the whole world. Is that true still? And he's the best player in the biggest sport.
Now I'm not really a big fan of watching soccer on TV because I think it's kind of boring. I love playing it. It was my favorite sport as a player. But watching it? Now here's the thing. If you watch even the best players in the world, like the best teams play each other, it's still kind of boring. But if Lionel Messi is on one of those two teams, oh my god, oh my god is it entertaining. In the same way that Michael Jordan was entertaining even if you didn't even have to be a basketball fan. But to watch Michael Jordan do something that humans can't do, that was really entertaining. Same with Stephen Curry. Watching him hit a three-pointer from mid-court, like that's fun to watch because he's not like the other players.
So when you watch somebody — you know, your Tiger Woods putting, etc. — who are just sort of not like other people, you know, your Larry Birds, it's a whole different thing. So I'm a giant fan of Lionel Messi even though watching soccer is no big deal for me. But I like to watch his clips. Just go to YouTube and watch just a compilation clip of Lionel Messi's goals. You don't have to like soccer to love the hell out of this because you're watching a person operate on a level that you just didn't even know a person could operate at.
And of course the backstory, if you don't know, is that Lionel Messi was always told he was too small, literally too short to play professional soccer. And he went from too short to play to the best player in the world in the biggest sport.
Here's the tragic part. Where he's lived for 21 years — I think he was playing for Barcelona — he has to leave the team because they have financial problems and they can't afford it. He has to take his family which has lived in this one place for 21 years, basically his entire adult life. I think his kids were raised there and everything else. And he has to leave because they have debt and they can't afford to pay him. He offered to play for half his pay so he didn't have to move his family.
Do you know how much that gives up? It was like a difference between 1.5 million dollars per game and 700,000. I mean, still a ridiculous amount of money, but he offered to play for half. They couldn't afford him. He's got to leave.
I got to tell you that of all the stories I read today — you know the news is full of tragedies and death and stuff — I don't know why, but that bothered me the most.
Here's a story that I made a little note to myself that this almost made me cry. But that's not true. It actually made me cry. I saw a couple of people on Twitter today giving me some at least partial credit in one case for helping somebody quit drinking. Ed Latimore was mentioned. And as famously a non-drinker as am I.
And I have to tell you, you know most of you know my story. I've told it too many times. My stepson died of an overdose in 2018. Fentanyl was in his system. And you know that that sort of radicalizes you as that has that effect. And when I see that somebody quit an addiction because of anything I did or said — you know, even if I was just a little bit of that, because people make their own choices. I don't think other people cause you to do things. I think you make your own choices. But if I could help even a little bit, that's really meaningful to me. It's really meaningful because it gives meaning to my stepson's life if there's something that his tragic ending caused. And it caused other people to have maybe more success in quitting their addictions.
And then somebody else was saying that he had drank — I won't give their names because privacy reasons even though they tweeted it. It's not my business to tell you their names. Another one said that as of today he was going to stop drinking 10 beers a day, which he'd been drinking forever. And today is the day that he's going to stop drinking 10 beers a day. Now that's pretty tough. Pretty tough. But I tweeted him so you can cheer him on.
Lauren Boebert. You all know Lauren. She's a gun-toting new member of Congress, Republican, and quite interesting. Quite interesting person. She tweeted the same people that thought Lollapalooza was just fine — meaning in terms of the COVID — are now saying that Sturgis will be a super spreader disaster.
Do you think that's true? Do you think the same people that thought Lollapalooza was just fine are now saying that Sturgis will be a super spreader disaster? Those people don't exist. Find me somebody who said one of them was a problem and one wasn't. Find me that one person in the world who says that one group is a problem and one is not. That person doesn't exist.
So much of our politics is about this imaginary person. The imaginary person who's a hypocrite doesn't exist. It's a whole political opinion about imaginary people. Why are we spending our time on imaginary people? Could it be because we don't have that many real problems? Are we so far out of real problems you literally have to make up an imaginary person, describe them?
You're saying Obama? Yes, yes I hear what you're saying about Obama and his birthday hypocrisy. I usually don't do the hypocrisy topics. Have you ever noticed that? Have you noticed that even if the news is just buzzing with the hypocrisy topics, I usually don't talk about them? Because there's nothing to say. Yeah, you used to say this. Now you say this. Now you're a liar. What else is there? Is there any depth to that? Would you learn anything? Nope.
So Jim Acosta went on what they call an epic rant. It's not a regular rant. It's epic. It's an epic rant. So Jim Acosta on CNN, he went on his epic rant and mocked DeSantis for DeSantis's stand on the coronavirus and said that maybe we should call the next variant the DeSantis variant. Wow. Zing. Zing.
You know who taught Jim Acosta this technique? Who taught Jim Acosta to cleverly brand people to make their political careers less successful? Who was it? I'm getting an image. Somebody orange. Somebody that Jim Acosta doesn't like that much. That's right. Jim Acosta just became Trump.
He knew it was going to happen. Let me ask you this. In the time that you've known both President Trump and Jim Acosta, has Trump in any way become more like Jim Acosta? I'll wait. I'll wait for your answer. No. No. But in the time that you've been watching them, has Jim Acosta become more like Trump? Yes he has.
Talk about the ultimate revenge is making your worst enemy turn into you. That's a complete defeat. That's sort of like killing somebody and skinning them and wearing their skin as clothing. That's as hard as you can be. Somebody turning them into you. You can't win any harder than that.
But there's more to this story. Why not call it the DeSantis variant? It's not very good, is it? So you know when Trump does his linguistic kill shots, like you repeat them and they're kind of funny on the surface and they sort of like they hit you where it hurts. You know, like low energy Jeb. I mean that was just like Edward Scissorhands giving you a haircut kind of situation.
And then Jim's best play here is about the DeSantis variant. That's my Dr. Evil. How about that? The DeSantis variant.
Here's a little linguistic trick for you. Things have to sound right. So this is one of the things that Trump gets right that you don't know he's getting right because you don't even know it's a thing. One of the things that Trump gets right is he uses words that sound good together. Now you'll never notice it because he doesn't do it wrong. If he ever did it wrong you'd notice it. But because he never makes that mistake, he uses words that sound good when you put them together. You just don't notice how well he does it.
But here's a cost of not doing it well. The DeSantis variant. Oh that's going to be viral. It actually was viral but only because Jim Acosta said it. But there's nothing clever about that. The words DeSantis and variant, they don't really fit together do they? It's just one of these little things that Trump does perfectly all the time and then you don't even notice it's the thing you don't know it's a skill because he never does it wrong.
But this is obviously a skill because you can't imagine in any world that Trump himself — you know let's say he was on the other side from DeSantis — you can't imagine that he would have come up with let's call it the DeSantis variant. It's just too lame because the words sound a little too technical or something. They just don't have that populist punch.
But CNN's playbook looks like this. Here's a thing they like to do. They like to identify a top GOP contender for president. So they find out who's the most dangerous Republican at the moment. That's either Trump or DeSantis. Would you all agree? You know Ted Cruz has been sort of in that conversation and they attack him. But at the moment DeSantis is I'd say the top contender who's not Trump.
So they identify a top contender and then they attack the contender as either being anti-science or racist. They have two arguments and they will make those arguments no matter what the facts. It doesn't matter how many facts you have. They're just going to call you a racist and anti-science no matter what.
And then the third part is to produce an epic takedown. Get one of your hosts to do something that's quote worthy. In this case Acosta. So CNN becomes the news instead of the reporter of the news. That's right. CNN makes themselves the news and then they report on it. So basically they're manufacturing news. So it's not really fake news. It's more like manufactured news.
Roly-Poly sent me some audio files. Let's see if I can play one of them now. I was trying to get like an introduction to my sections on fake news. So here's one if I can play it. Fake news.
All right let's try another one here. Fake news. Tweet of the day. I don't think it was quite there. It needs a little work. Needs a little work.
All right how about this one? This is for the DeSantis news. Pretty good. Pretty good. Good start. Thank you Roly-Poly.
He's tweeting at me right now. Isn't it freaky seeing yourself mentioned on the live stream when you're watching it and then your name comes up? So I've had this happen to me a number of times. I'll turn on the television. I'll just be watching television and they start talking about me. It's so freaky. It's like no, I'm watching. You don't talk about me, television.
So that just happened to Roly-Poly.
How many of you have heard the theory that the therapeutics are being under-appreciated officially? Because if therapeutics existed for the COVID, legally we wouldn't be able to do an emergency use for some other drug if we already had a drug that was really helpful. How many of you heard that and believe that that's true?
How many of you are of the belief that the reason we don't talk about ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine — or now there's a new one, a cholesterol drug cuts coronavirus infection in a laboratory by 70% and it's an existing fairly safe drug that's off the shelf so it'd be a big deal if it worked, just like it would be a big deal if any of the others worked, right?
Regeneron is approved, I thought it was. I mean as opposed to an emergency approval. So I'm going to call fake news on that. I'm going to call that a conspiracy theory that is not backed up. Now I don't know. And I'm going to put odds on this right, so this doesn't mean I'm 100% sure. Sometimes I act like I'm completely sure when I'm not. So I'm trying to moderate that a little bit so that I don't do that so much.
Here's my take on it. Let's say there was a law or a rule that said you can't get your emergency authorization for the vaccines if therapeutics exist. And let's say in this scenario that therapeutics did exist. Let's say they did. Does that mean that in the context of a global pandemic there's nothing you could do? Because the rule says you can't authorize something for emergency use so you're done, right? You just can't do it. Is that right?
So you just can't do vaccines? No, nothing works that way. Nothing works that way. Now there might be a variant of this in which the pharmaceutical companies are bribing the government. But do you think that in the Trump administration — do you think Trump took a bribe from the pharma companies? That nobody's even suggested it, right?
And it would have to be Trump because he was the one beating up on the FDA to get the vaccinations through, etc. Let me tell you this. Let's say there was a rule or a law or whatever it is — I don't know what the situation is. It's either a rule or a law that you can't do the emergency use thing as long as therapeutics exist.
If you went to Trump during the — or any president, could be Biden — you go to the president, whoever it is, during a pandemic and you say we've got this rule that prevents us from doing this thing that would be really, really important to do, how long does the rule stop you? It's over. In a pandemic that kind of rule doesn't mean anything.
How many rules did Trump change just by signing an executive order? Did anybody question them? No. It's a pandemic. I mean it's a different situation at the moment, right? But during the worst of the pandemic we kind of stand aside and say okay leaders, we understand this is not the time to debate. This is the time to do something. And we know you're not going to be right every time. Like that would be unreasonable. But do something because it's an emergency.
You got to do something. Under those rules there's no way that a law or some guideline or rule would have stopped us from doing what made sense. So I'm going to call on the idea that the reason therapeutics are being undervalued by the government is because they just had to get this rule for the vaccinations and maybe big pharma was pushing or bribing somebody. I'm not buying it. I'm not buying it.
Because I don't think Trump could have been bribed by pharma. Does anybody disagree with that? Does anybody think that Trump — specifically Trump because he was the one there during the time this was all happening — do you think he could have been bribed by pharma? I just don't see it. I just don't see it.
And was there ever a rule that Trump didn't like breaking? I mean most of his act was tell me the rule that's in the way and then I'll break it. Remember you couldn't do telehealth, having a doctor call you across state lines? And I was a little involved with that. What did Trump do? He said oh here's a law that's in the way. It's goodbye. It's gone.
I don't believe for a second that Trump was affected by big pharma wanting not to have therapeutics look good. I just don't think for a minute that affected him. If it had been a different president, maybe. Maybe. But I just don't see it affecting Trump. He's the guy who just blows through rules. He doesn't care.
Trump screwed the pharma companies during his presidency in a variety of ways and he did it right in their face. So I don't think he was going to do it because they wanted it. That's for sure.
Here's one of those rules that I'll say a million times because it's so important. You only manage the things you track. This is one of the biggest deals in all of management. In fact there's no such thing as management if you're not tracking. Because otherwise you're just flailing around. You don't know if the things you do are working or not working. It's not management unless you can track. Oh we did this and I got this result so we should do more of it or less of it based on the result.
So at this point the way we track the COVID stuff will determine what we do about it. Let me say that again. You don't decide what to do about it and then figure out how to track it. Ideally I suppose you do it that way. You end up tracking whatever you can track and then whatever it was that you could track works backwards and then that's what you managed. Which is a bad way to do business. You don't want to manage to what you can measure because it's the only thing you can measure.
Now in our case we're reporting — I saw this again. California had 13 deaths yesterday from COVID allegedly. They did not report at the same time how many of the 13 were vaccinated. Don't you want to know that? Like if the public is part of this process and should be — I mean I don't think the government should be making decisions alone. The public opinion and the public feedback is part of the whole process, right? That's the way we run this stuff.
And if the public doesn't get good information or let's say information that they can act on productively, then you're not managing. It's not that you're doing it right or wrong. You're not doing it. Let me say that again. I'm not saying that the government is managing COVID right or wrong. I'm saying they're not managing it. There's no stated strategy and we're not even tracking the right stuff.
Because if you tracked how many people died who were vaccinated versus unvaccinated that would tell you something. If most of the people dying are unvaccinated, why do I care? In terms of living in a free society of course I care about people. It would be individual tragedies of course. But why would I care from a policy perspective if these people had access to the vaccinations, chose not to take them, got the result that you get if things go wrong under that consideration? Why do I care? I'm vaccinated. I had access to it. They had access to it. As long as they have access to vaccinations I need to know how many died vaccinated.
Now Mark Cuban — you all know Mark — tweeted at me. He said, Scott, period. You do realize that if say we got to 90% of people vaccinated that it's likely that around 90% of the hospitalizations and deaths would be vaccinated. But the total number of hospitalizations and deaths would be about 90% lower than had people not been vaxxed. So he said do you realize this?
Yes, yes, yes I realize that. I say it all the time. And that doesn't change the request to have accurate numbers, right? So you all understand that if 100% of people were vaccinated then every person who died from COVID after that point would be a vaccinated person. And you would not conclude from that the vaccinations don't work. You would say thank goodness it was only five people. It could have been thousands, right?
So Mark, your point is good but of course I say this all the time. However if you had all of these numbers you'd be in good shape. If you knew how many were vaccinated of the deaths and how many were unvaccinated and then you also knew what percentage of the country or the state was vaccinated, you'd have everything you needed, right?
So yes Mark's point is good and you should all be aware of it. That's why I say it all the time. If everybody's vaccinated then those are the only people dying. It doesn't mean the vaccination doesn't work.
So tell me how many are unvaccinated or don't imagine that I care.
Kira — how do you pronounce K-I-R-A? Kira or Kyra? Anyway sorry I'm mispronouncing your name Kira. But she tweeted I'd frankly also like to see stats for the different vaccines administered. Wouldn't you? Wouldn't you like to see that? And why haven't you? Because it does seem like a reasonable question.
I would think that every person who gets hospitalized with COVID should be asked are you vaccinated and which one and how recently. You know those are the things we should be asking. I'm guessing we asked that but is it a federal regulation? It should be. There should be some federal regulation that says you have to ask that and report it.
Now I would say that maybe there was a reason we didn't report that before. Because remember you only get — in terms of managing you only get what you measure. Suppose we had measured that from the start, the differences in vaccination results. What would that have done? Because that's what you're measuring and what you measure causes you to act differently.
I think it would have caused fewer vaccinations in the beginning because there was an availability problem. So if you could get any one of the vaccinations you'd get it. You didn't want people shopping, which is sort of what I was doing. I was kind of shopping. That's why I waited so long. I was waiting to see if any of the vaccinations were duds or if there's any surprises. So I waited as long as I could to get as much information, you know, a few months.
But at this point now that anybody can get a vaccination you could probably shop, couldn't you? Don't you think that maybe you'd get a few more people vaccinated if that was your goal by telling them okay we've got different vaccinations. We did find this one's 5% better. And maybe some people would say oh okay I feel like I know more about the vaccinations so I'll give it a shot. I'll give it a shot.
Dr. Eli David — not a medical doctor but another kind of smart doctor — was tweeting there's a new peer-reviewed paper showing the aerosols play a major role in COVID transmission and fine aerosols constitute 85% of viral load detected. And he says that masks can block droplets not aerosols. So it's time to abolish all non-scientific mask mandates.
To which I say the same things I always said. If you have data from a laboratory experiment — which is what this is I believe — and you also have data from the field, which one do you look at? You got two sets of data. In the laboratory they say huh we're not sure these masks are working. But in the real world they're working. In other words where there are masks you can measure that there's more of a benefit.
Now is any of that data accurate? Who knows? We're in a world where you can't trust anything. You can't trust that the masks work. You can't trust that they don't work. You definitely can't trust a laboratory study.
So here's what I would tell you. I would never look at a peer-reviewed — which is different than a randomized controlled trial — I would never look at just a peer-reviewed paper that said that we tested something in a laboratory and found out that there's a lot of aerosols that matter. We kind of already knew that the aerosols matter. And we also knew that the masks were never intended to stop 100% of anything. They were supposed to stop some amount of it during the worst of the pandemic.
Now I'm anti-mask mandate just to be clear because it sounds like I'm being pro-mask. But I think you can have the nuanced opinion. The masks make some difference but overall they're not worth it because your lifestyle would be so affected by it. So that's my point of view.
I believe that masks almost certainly make some difference. Let me put it this way. If you knew you were in a room with people who had COVID — let's say you knew there was one person in the room and you're going to talk to all of them one by one — would you want the person who is talking to you from three feet away and facing you to be wearing a mask or not? Yeah, right.
How often before the masks were a big thing were you talking to somebody and you could feel their spittle in your face? You know what I'm talking about. You can feel the spittle hitting you in the face. I feel like if somebody has COVID I don't want their spittle hitting my face and the mask would make some difference, right?
So I think you can be scientific enough to say masks do make a difference. At the same time you can say maybe we've reached the point where if unvaccinated people want to take the chance let them do it. And vaccinated people too. So remember vaccinated people are getting the virus now so don't forget that.
Barnes posted a link on a randomized control trial that should statistically prove that ivermectin was effective at treating COVID. Interesting. So somebody's saying that Barnes has posted — and you can see Viva and Barnes. Their podcast is great by the way. It's one of the best ones. You should watch on YouTube and/or Locals. I think you can see it on both platforms. Twitch too maybe.
But this is news I haven't heard before so I'm just seeing it in a comment on Locals that there might be some new news on ivermectin.
All right. Is there anything I missed? I said Viva and Barnes.
I'm going to look at your comments here for a moment. Cori Bush. Yeah I don't have much to say about her. I know what you're talking about but yes there's a story about a police officer who almost OD'd on fentanyl without taking any. Was just around it and just sniffed it. That happens to drug dogs too. If a drug dog sniffs fentanyl, dog's dead.
How did a guy like you get a girl like Christina? You know you're not the first person to ask. But why isn't anybody asking how a girl like Christina got a great guy like me? Could it be my looks? Could be.
All right that's about all I got for today and I will talk to you tomorrow.
morning it's time for coffee with scott adams once again the best part of your day it never fails and is everybody ready are you prepared because you don't want to go into this without preparation that would be insanity because all you need is a cup or a mugger glass a tanker tells us time to canteen drink a flesh vessel again any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine of the day the thing that makes well everything better it's called the simultaneous sip it happens now go who says i have the worst theme song ever so cruel you're so cruel well here's my favorite story of the day a saudi prince had 80 falcons that he wanted to relocate or possibly take on vacation the story's a little unclear but he bought airplane seats for all 80 of his falcons now of course they were tied to little little stands so the falcons couldn't fly around inside the plane but here's a question i ask suppose the plane lost its engines but the falcons feeling that the plane was going down all started flapping in unison could they lift the plane no of course not not only because they're not strong enough but they're inside the plane and so all of their actions would be confined to inside so it wouldn't really work but do you know how jokes work yeah this isn't about the joke it's about the mechanism for a joke here's what makes a joke funny something that your brain feels makes sense but also knows it doesn't that's a joke a joke when when there's something about this situation that sort of kind of makes sense but the rest of your brain says no it doesn't no it doesn't but you can't get it out of your head the two of them live there at the same time and that causes a little reflex called laugh here's uh here's a better joke about that uh rocky manichani who was uh that little bp here whenever i'm doing this there's literally one bird that walks in front of my same security camera every day when i'm here it's the same damn bird i don't know what he's doing there every day um but rocky uh manichetti her uh tweeted about my story about the 80 falcons in the plane and he said imagine being a bird that died in a plane crash that would be the worst way to go if you were a bird you know if i were not inside this plane things would be going pretty pretty well for me that's larry david saying pretty pretty well so i'll just start with that meanwhile in the law of unintended consequences is that roly-poly i need a i need a sting for that too the law of unintended consequences um so megan rapineau wanted to show her concern for people in this country who are less fortunate and or in worse circumstance and so she has become sort of the the face of the professional kneelers the people who are kneeling when the anthem is played or the flag is shown and the of course her intention i can't read her mind but it seems that her intention was to make the world a better place to make it uh more fair i'm seeing a funny picture of megan rapidow conflated with joe biden's face that's pretty funny and she intended to make the world a little bit kinder a little bit nicer here's what she actually did nbc's prime time coverage of the tokyo olympics was down 49 compared to the equivalent night in 2016.
and 53 less than the 2020 12 of the 2012 london olympics and the opening ceremonies were the lowest viewership since 1988.
now it's not just a story that there were fewer advertisers but at some point the advertising is not enough to support the event and i think we're pretty close if not already there so there's a really a very real chance that megan rapinow legitimately intended just to make the world a kinder nicer place that's more welcoming and fair for everyone and what she did was destroy the olympics destroyed the olympics so megan uh we call that an own goal that's that's the official name for that that's an own goal speaking of own goals of all the news today the the thing that bothered me the most was lionel messi if you don't follow soccer especially international soccer you may not know who lionel messi is but consider that soccer is the most i guess the most important sport in the whole world is that true still and he's the best player in the biggest sport now i'm not really a big fan of watching soccer on tv because i think it's kind of boring too i love playing it was my favorite sport as a player but watching it now here's the thing if you watch even the best players in the world like the best teams play each other it's still kind of boring but if lionel messi is on one of those two teams oh my god oh my god is it entertaining in the same way that michael jordan was entertaining even if he didn't watch you didn't even have to be a basketball fan but to watch michael jordan do something that humans can't do that was really entertaining same with stephen curry watching him he had a three-pointer from mid mid court like that's fun to watch because he's not like the other players so when you watch somebody you know your tiger woods putting etc who are just sort of not like other people you know you're larry birds it's a whole different thing so i'm a giant fan of lionel messi even though watching soccer is no big deal for me but i like to watch his clips just go to youtube and watch just a compilation clip of lionel messi's goals you don't have to like soccer to love the hell out of this because you're watching a person operate on a level that you just didn't even know a person could operate at and and of course the back story if you don't know is that lionel messi was always told he was too small literally too short to play professional soccer and he went from too short to play to the best player in the world in the biggest sport here's the tragic part where he's lived for 21 years i think he was playing for barcelona he has to leave the team because they have financial problems and they can't afford it he has to take his family which has lived in this one place it's you know for 21 years basically entire adult life i think his kids raised there and everything else and he has to leave because they have debt and they can't afford to pay him he offered he offered to play for half his pay so he didn't have to move his family do you know how much that gives up it was like a difference between 1.5 million dollars per game and 700 000.
i mean still ridiculous amount of money but he offered to play for half they couldn't afford him he's got to leave i i got to tell you that of all the stories i read today you know the news is full of tragedies and death and stuff i don't know why but that bothered me the most here's a story that i was i a little made a little note to myself that this almost made me cry but that's not true it actually made me cry um i saw a couple of people on twitter today giving me some at least partial credit in one case for helping somebody quit drinking ed latimer was mentioned and as famously a non-drinker as am i and i have to tell you you know most of you know my story i've told it too many times my stepson died of an overdose in 2018.
fentanyl um was in his system and you know that that sort of radicalizes you as that has that effect and when i see that somebody quit an addiction because of anything i did or said you know even if i was just a little bit of that you know because people make their own choices i don't think other people cause you to do things i think you make your own choices but if i could help even a little bit that's really meaningful to me it's really meaningful because it gives meaning to my stepson's life if if there's something that you know his tragic ending caused and it caused other people to have maybe more success in quitting their addictions and then somebody else was saying that he had he had drank i won't give their names because privacy reasons even though they tweeted it it's not it's not my business to tell you their names um another one said that as of today he was going to stop drinking 10 beers a day which he'd been drinking forever and today is the day that he's going to stop drinking 10 beers a day now that's pretty tough pretty tough but i tweeted him so you can cheer him on uh lauren beaubert you all know lauren she's a gun-toting new member of congress republican and quite interesting quite interesting person she i did tweet it so you'll see it um she she says the say she tweeted the same people that thought lollapalooza was just fine meaning in terms of the covet uh are now saying that sturgis will be a super shredder disaster do you think that's true do you think the same people that thought lollapalooza was just fine are now saying that sturgis will be a super spreader disaster those people don't exist find me somebody who said one of them was a problem and one wasn't find me that one person in the world who says that one group is a problem and one is not that person doesn't exist so much of our politics is about this imaginary person the imaginary person who's a hypocrite doesn't exist it's a whole political opinion about imaginary people why are we spending our time on imaginary people could it be because we don't have that many real problems are we so far out of real problems you literally have to make up an imaginary person describe them you're saying you're saying obama yes yes i hear what you're saying about obama and his birthday hypocrisy i usually don't do the hypocrisy topics have you ever noticed that have you noticed that even if the news is just buzzing with the hypocrisy topics i usually don't talk about them because there's nothing to say yeah you used to say this now you now you say this now you're a liar what else is there is there any depth to that would you learn anything nope um so jim acosta went on what they call an epic rant it's not a regular rant it's epic it's an epic rant so jim acosta on cnn he went on his epic rant and mocked desantis for desantis's uh stand on the coronavirus and said that maybe we should call the next variant the desantis variant wow zing zing you know who taught jim acosta this technique who taught jim acosta to cleverly brand people to make their political careers less successful who was it i'm getting an image somebody orange somebody that jim acosta doesn't like that much that's right jim acosta just became trump he knew it was going to happen did let me ask you this in the time that you've known both president trump and jim acosta has trump in any way become more like jim acosta i'll wait i'll wait for your answer no no but in the time that you've been watching them has jim acosta become more like trump yes he has talk about the ultimate revenge is making your worst enemy turn into you that's that's a complete defeat that's that's sort of uh that's like killing somebody and skinning them and wearing their skin as a as clothing that's as hard as you can be somebody turning them into you you can't win any harder than that but uh there's more to this story why not call it the desantis variant it's not very good is it so you know when uh when trump does his linguistic kill shots like you repeat them and they're they're kind of funny on the surface and they they sort of like they hate you where it hurts you know like uh like low energy jab i mean that was just that was just like edward scissorhands giving you a haircut kind of situation and then jim's best play here is about the dissenters variant that's my dr evil um how about that the descent is very here's a little uh linguistic trick for you things have to sound right so this is one of the things that trump gets right that you don't know he's getting right because you don't even know it's a thing one of the things that trump gets right is he uses words that sound good together now you'll never notice it because he doesn't do it wrong if he ever did it wrong you'd notice it but because he never makes that mistake he uses words that sound together sound good when you put them together you just don't notice how well he does it but here's a cost of not doing it well the desantis variant oh that's going to be viral it actually was viral but only because jim acosta said it but there's nothing clever about that the words desantis and variant it doesn't they don't really fit together do they it's just one of these little things that trump does perfectly all the time and then you don't even notice it's the thing you don't know it's a skill because he never does it wrong but this is obviously a skill because you you can't imagine in any world that trump himself you know let's say he was on the other side from desantis you can't imagine that he would have come up with s let's call the de santos variant it's just too lame because the words sound a little too i don't know technical or something they just don't have that that populist punch but cnn's playbook looks like this here's a thing they do like to do they like to identify a top gop contender for the president so they find out who's the most dangerous republican at the moment that's either trump or desantis would you all agree you know ted cruz has been you know sort of in that conversation and they attack him but at the moment desantis is i'd say the top contender who's not uh trump so they identify a top contender and then they attack the contender as either being anti-science or racist they have two arguments and they will make those arguments no matter what the facts doesn't matter how many facts you have they're just going to call you a racist and anti-science no matter what and then the third part is to produce an epic takedown get one of your hosts to do something that's quote worthy in this case acosta so the cnn becomes the news instead of the reporter of the news that's right cnn makes themselves the news and then they report on it so basically they're manufacturing news so it's not really fake news it's more like manufactured news but here's uh roly-poly user roly-poly sent me some uh auto files that let's see if i can play one of them now i was trying to get a like an introduction to my sections on fake news so here's one if i can play it fake news all right let's let's try another one here fake news tweet of the day i don't think it was quite there it needs a little work needs a little work all right how about this one um this is for the desantis news pretty good pretty good good start thank you roly-poly um user he's tweeting at me right now isn't it freaky seeing uh yourself mentioned on on the live stream when you're watching it and then your name comes out so i've had this happen to me a number of times i'll turn on the television i'll just be watching television and they start talking about me it's so freaky it's like no i'm watching you don't talk about me television so that just happened to roly poly so how many of you have heard the theory that the therapeutics are being under let's say under-appreciated officially because if therapeutics existed for the covent legally we wouldn't be able to do an emergency use for some other drug if we already had a drug that was you know really helpful how many of you heard that and believe that that's true how many of you are of the belief that the reason we don't talk about ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine or now there's a new one a cholesterol drug cuts coronavirus infection in a laboratory by 70 and it's i guess it's an existing fairly safe drug that's off the shelf so it'd be a big deal if it worked just like it would be a big deal if any of the others worked right so yeah regeneron is isn't it regeneron approved i thought it was i mean as opposed to an emergency approval so i'm going to call fake news on that i'm going to call that a conspiracy theory that is not backed up now i don't know and i'm going to put odds on this right so this doesn't mean i'm 100 sure sometimes i act like i'm completely sure what i'm not so i'm trying to moderate that a little bit so that i don't do that so much here's my take on it let's say there was a law or a rule that said you can't get your emergency authorization for the vaccines if therapeutics exist and let's say in this scenario that therapeutics did exist let's say they did does that mean that in the context of a global pandemic there's nothing you could do because the the rule says you can't authorize something for emergency use so you're done right you just can't do it is that right so you just can't do vaccines no nothing works that way nothing works that way now there might be there's there's a variant of this in which the pharmaceutical companies are you know bribing the government but do you think that in the trump administration do you think trump took a bribe from the pharma companies that nobody's even suggested it right and it would have to be trump because he was the one beating up on the fda to get the vaccinations through et cetera let me tell you this let's say there was a rule or a law or whatever it is i don't know what the situation is it's either a rule or a law that you can't do the emergency use thing as long as therapeutics exist if you went to trump during the um or any president could be biden to you go to the president whoever it is during a pandemic and you say we've got this rule that prevents us from doing this thing that would be really really important to do how long does the rule stop you it's it's over in a pandemic that kind of rule doesn't mean anything how many how many rules did trump change just by signing an executive order did anybody question them no it's a pandemic i mean it's a different situation at the moment right but during the the worst of the pandemic we kind of stand aside and say okay leaders we understand this is not the time to debate this is the time to do something and we know you're not going to be right every time like that would be unreasonable but but do something because it's an emergency you got to do something under those rules there's no way that a law or some guideline or rule would have stopped us from doing what made sense so i'm going to call on the on the idea that the reason therapeutics are being under undervalued by the government is because they just had to get this rule for the vaccinations and maybe the farm big pharma was pushing or bribing somebody i'm not buying it i'm not buying it because i don't think trump could have been bribed by pharma does anybody disagree with that does anybody think that trump specifically trump because he was the one there during the time this was all happening do you think he could have been bribed by pharma just i just don't see it right i just don't see it and and was there ever a rule that trump didn't like breaking i mean most of his act was tell me the tell me the rule that's in the way and then i'll break it remember you couldn't do tele telehealth having a doctor call you across state lines and i was a little involved with that what did trump do he said oh here's a law that's in the way it's goodbye it's gone i don't believe for a second that trump was affected by big pharma wanting not to have therapeutics look good i just don't think for a minute that affected him if it had been a different president maybe maybe but i just don't see it affecting trump he's the guy who who just blows through rules he doesn't care yeah i mean trump screwed the pharma companies during his presidency in a variety of ways and he did it right in their face so i don't think he was going to do it because they wanted it that's for sure here's one of those rules that i'll say a million times because it's so important you only manage the things you track this is one of the biggest deals in all of management in fact there's no such thing as management if you're not tracking because otherwise you're just flailing around you don't know if the things you do are working or not working it's not management unless you can track oh we did this and i got this result so we should do more of it or less of it based on the result so um at this point the way we track the covet stuff will determine what we do about it let me say that again you don't decide what to do about it and then figure out how to track it ideally i suppose you do it that way you end up tracking whatever you can track and then whatever it was that you could track works backwards and then that's what you managed to which is a bad way to do business you don't want to manage to what you can measure because it's the only thing you can measure now in our case we're reporting i saw this again california had 13 deaths yesterday from covent allegedly they did not report at the same time how many of the 13 were i just had a technical glitch on locals platform but it's going to come back in a second so sorry youtube just a moment and i'll get back to this story i believe i can go right back to it all right i'm back sorry locals a little technical difficulty uh that's the second time that's happened um so california reported 13 people died yesterday of covid but how many of them were vaccinated don't you want to know that like if the public is part of this process and should be i mean i don't think the government should be making decisions alone the the public opinion and the public feedback is part of the whole process right that's that's the way we run this stuff and if the public doesn't get good information or let's say information that they can act on productively then you're not managing it's not that you're doing it right or wrong you're not doing it let me say that again i'm not saying that the government is managing covid right or wrong i'm saying they're not managing it there's no stated strategy and we're not we're not even tracking the right stuff because if you tracked how many people died who were vaccinated versus unvaccinated that would tell you something if the only if most of the people dying are unvaccinated why do i care right in terms of you know living in free society of course i care about people you know it would be individual tragedies of course but why would i care from a policy perspective if these people had access to the vaccinations chose not to take them got the result that you get if things go wrong under that consideration why do i care i'm vaccinated i had access to it they had access to it as long as they have access to vaccinations i need to know how many died vaccinated now mark cuban you all know mark tweeted at me he said scott period you do realize that if say we got to 90 of people have vaccinated that it's likely that around 90 of the hospitalizations and deaths would be vaccinated but the total number of hospitalizations deaths would be about 90 lower than had people not been vaxxed so he said do you realize this yes yes yes i realize that i say it all the time and that doesn't change the request to have accurate numbers right so you all understand that if a hundred percent of people were vaccinated then every person who died from covet after that point would be a vaccinated person and you would not conclude from that the vaccinations don't work you would say thank goodness it was only five people could have been thousands right so mark your point is good but of course uh i say this all the time however if you had all of these numbers you'd be in good shape if you knew how many were vaccinated of the deaths and how many were unvaccinated and then you also knew you know what percentage of the country or the state was vaccinated you'd have everything you needed right so yes mark's point is good and you should all be aware of it that's why i say it all the time if everybody's vaccinated then those are the only people dying it doesn't mean the vaccination doesn't work so um tell me how many are unvaccinated or don't let me or don't imagine that i care um cairo omega on or kira how do you pronounce k-i-r-a kira or kyra anyway sorry i'm mispronouncing your name kira but she tweeted i'd frankly also like to see stats for the different vaccines administered wouldn't you wouldn't you like to see that and why haven't you because it does seem like a reasonable question i would think that every person who gets hospitalized with covent should be asked are you vaccinated and which one and and how recently you know those are the things we should be asking i'm guessing we asked that but is it a is it a federal regulation it should be there should be some federal regulation that says you have to ask that and report it now i would say that maybe there was a reason we didn't report that before because remember you you only get in terms of managing you only get what you measure suppose we had measured that from the start the differences in vaccination results what would that have done because that's what you're measuring and what you measure causes you to act differently i think it would have caused fewer vaccinations in the beginning because there was a availability problem so if you could get any one of the vaccinations you'd get it you didn't want people shopping which is sort of what i was doing i was kind of shopping that's why i waited so long i was waiting to see if any of the vaccinations were duds or if there's any surprises so i waited as long as i could to get as much information you know a few months but at this point now that anybody can get a vaccination you could probably shop couldn't you don't you think that maybe you'd get a few more people vaccinated if that was your goal by telling them okay we've got different vaccinations we did find this one's five percent better and maybe some people would say oh okay i feel i feel like you know more about the vaccinations so i'll give it a shot i'll give it a shot wrong um dr eli david not a medical doctor but another kind of smart doctor was tweeting there's a new peer-reviewed paper showing the aerosols play a major role in covet transmission and fine aerosols constitute 85 of viral load detected and he says that masks can drop can block droplets not aerosols so it's time to abolish all non-scientific mask mandates to which i say the same things i always said if you have data from a laboratory experiment which is what this is i believe and you also have laboratory from the field or you have data from the field which one do you look at you got two sets of data in the laboratory they say huh we're not sure these masks are working but in the real world they're working in other words where there are masks that can measure that there's more of a benefit now is any of that data accurate who knows we're in a world where you can't trust anything you can't trust that the masks work you can't trust that they don't work you definitely can't trust a laboratory study so here's what i would tell you i would never look at a peer-reviewed which is different than a randomized controlled trial i would never look at it just a peer-reviewed paper that said that we tested something in a laboratory and found out that there's a lot of aerosols that matter we kind of already knew that that the aerosols matter and we also knew that the mass were never intended to stop a hundred percent of anything they were they were they were supposed to stop some some amount of it during the worst of the pandemic now i'm anti-mass mandate just to be clear because it sounds like i'm being pro-masculine but i think you can have the nuanced opinion the masks make some difference but overall they're not worth it because your lifestyle would be so affected by it so that's my my point of view i believe that mass almost certainly makes some difference let me put it this way if you knew you were in a room with people who had coveted let's say you knew there was one person in the room and you're going to talk to all of them one by one would you want the person who is talking to you from three feet away and facing you to be wearing a mask or not yeah right how often before the masks were a big thing were you talking to somebody and you could feel their spittle in your face you know what i'm talking about you can feel the spindle hitting you in the face i feel like if somebody has covet i don't want their spittle hitting my face and the mask would make some difference right so i think you can be uh scientific enough to say masks to make a difference at the same time you can say maybe we've reached the point where if unvaccinated people want to take the chance let them do it and vaccinated people too so remember vaccinated people are getting the virus now so don't forget that um let's see barnes posted a link on a randomized control trial that should statistically give rules that ivormectin was effective at treating covet interesting so um somebody's saying that uh uh barnes has posted a and you can see uh viva and barnes uh their podcast is great by the way it's one of the best ones you should watch on youtube and or locals i think you can see it on both platforms twitch too maybe um but this is news i haven't heard before so i'm just seeing it in a comment on locals that uh there might be some new news on ivermectin all right um all right is there anything i missed i said uh viva and barnes um i'm going to look at your comments here for a moment corey bush yeah i don't have much to say about her i know what you're talking about but um yes there's a story about a police officer who almost od'd on fentanyl without taking any was just around it and just sniffed it that happens to drug dogs too if a drug dog sniffs fentanyl dog's dead um how did a guy like you get a girl like christina you know you're not the first person to ask but why isn't anybody asking how a girl like christina got a great guy like me could it be my looks could be all right that's about all i got for today and i will talk to you tomorrow
morning it's time for coffee with scott
adams
once again the best part of your day it
never fails
and is everybody ready are you prepared
because you don't want to go into this
without preparation that would be
insanity because all you need is a cup
or a mugger glass a tanker tells us time
to canteen drink a flesh vessel again
any kind
fill it with your favorite liquid i like
coffee
and join me now for the unparalleled
pleasure the dopamine of the day the
thing that makes
well everything better it's called the
simultaneous sip it happens now go
who says i have the worst theme song
ever
so cruel you're so cruel
well here's my favorite story of the day
a saudi prince
had 80 falcons that he wanted to
relocate
or possibly take on vacation the story's
a little unclear
but he bought airplane seats for all
80 of his falcons now of course they
were
tied to little little stands so the
falcons couldn't fly around inside the
plane
but here's a question i ask
suppose the plane lost its engines
but the falcons feeling that the plane
was going down
all started flapping in unison
could they lift the plane no
of course not not only because they're
not strong enough
but they're inside the plane and so all
of their actions would be confined
to inside so it wouldn't really work but
do you know how jokes work yeah
this isn't about the joke it's about the
mechanism for a joke
here's what makes a joke funny something
that your brain
feels makes sense
but also knows it doesn't that's a joke
a joke when when there's something about
this situation that
sort of kind of makes sense but the rest
of your brain says no it doesn't no it
doesn't
but you can't get it out of your head
the two of them live there at the same
time and that causes a little reflex
called laugh here's uh
here's a better joke about that uh rocky
manichani
who was uh that little bp here
whenever i'm doing this there's
literally one bird
that walks in front of my same security
camera every day when i'm here
it's the same damn bird i don't know
what he's doing there every day
um but rocky uh manichetti
her uh tweeted about my story about the
80 falcons in the plane and he said
imagine being a bird that died in a
plane crash
that would be the worst way to go if you
were a bird
you know if i were not inside this plane
things would be going pretty pretty well
for me that's
larry david saying pretty pretty well
so i'll just start with that
meanwhile in the law of unintended
consequences
is that roly-poly i need a i need a
sting for that too
the law of unintended consequences
um so megan rapineau
wanted to show her concern
for people in this country who are less
fortunate and or in worse circumstance
and so she has become sort of the the
face of the
professional kneelers the people who are
kneeling
when the anthem is played or the flag is
shown
and the of course her intention
i can't read her mind but it seems that
her intention was to make the world a
better place
to make it uh more fair
i'm seeing a funny picture of megan
rapidow conflated with
joe biden's face that's pretty funny
and she intended to make the world a
little bit kinder
a little bit nicer here's what she
actually did
nbc's prime time coverage of the tokyo
olympics
was down 49
compared to the equivalent night in
2016.
and 53 less than the 2020
12 of the 2012 london olympics
and the opening ceremonies were the
lowest viewership since 1988.
now it's not just a story that
there were fewer advertisers but
at some point the advertising is not
enough to support the event
and i think we're pretty close if not
already there so
there's a really a very real chance that
megan
rapinow legitimately intended just to
make the world a
kinder nicer place that's more welcoming
and
fair for everyone and what she did was
destroy the olympics destroyed the
olympics
so megan uh we call that an own goal
that's that's the official name for that
that's an own goal
speaking of own goals
of all the news today the the thing that
bothered me the most
was lionel messi if you don't follow
soccer
especially international soccer you may
not know who
lionel messi is but consider that soccer
is the most
i guess the most important sport in the
whole world
is that true still and he's
the best player in the biggest sport
now i'm not really a big fan of watching
soccer on tv because i think it's kind
of boring too
i love playing it was my favorite sport
as a player
but watching it now here's the thing
if you watch even the best players in
the world like the best teams play each
other
it's still kind of boring but
if lionel messi is on one of those two
teams
oh my god oh my god is it entertaining
in the same way that michael jordan was
entertaining even if he didn't watch
you didn't even have to be a basketball
fan but to watch michael jordan do
something that humans can't do
that was really entertaining same with
stephen curry
watching him he had a three-pointer from
mid mid court
like that's fun to watch because he's
not like the other players
so when you watch somebody you know your
tiger woods putting etc who are just
sort of not like other people
you know you're larry birds it's a whole
different thing so i'm a giant fan
of lionel messi even though watching
soccer is no big deal for me
but i like to watch his clips just go to
youtube and watch just a compilation
clip
of lionel messi's goals you don't have
to like soccer
to love the hell out of this because
you're watching a person
operate on a level that you just didn't
even know a person could operate
at and and of course the back story if
you don't know
is that lionel messi was always told he
was too small
literally too short to play professional
soccer
and he went from too short to play to
the best player in the world in the
biggest sport
here's the tragic part where he's lived
for 21 years
i think he was playing for barcelona he
has to leave the team
because they have financial problems and
they can't afford it
he has to take his family which has
lived
in this one place it's you know for 21
years basically
entire adult life i think his kids
raised there and everything else
and he has to leave because they have
debt
and they can't afford to pay him he
offered he offered to play for
half his pay so he didn't have to move
his family
do you know how much that gives up it
was like a difference between 1.5
million dollars per game
and 700 000. i mean still ridiculous
amount of money
but he offered to play for half they
couldn't afford him
he's got to leave i i got to tell you
that of all the stories i read today you
know the news is full of tragedies and
death and stuff i don't know why but
that bothered me the most
[Music]
here's a story that i was i a little
made a little note to myself that this
almost made me cry
but that's not true it actually made me
cry
um i saw a couple of people on twitter
today
giving me some at least partial credit
in one case for
helping somebody quit drinking
ed latimer was mentioned and as famously
a non-drinker as am i
and i have to tell you you know most of
you
know my story i've told it too many
times my stepson died of an overdose
in 2018. fentanyl um was in his system
and you know that that sort of
radicalizes you
as that has that effect and when i see
that somebody quit
an addiction because of anything i did
or said
you know even if i was just a little bit
of that you know
because people make their own choices i
don't think other people
cause you to do things i think you make
your own choices
but if i could help even a little bit
that's really meaningful to me it's
really meaningful
because it gives meaning to my stepson's
life
if if there's something that you know
his tragic ending
caused and it caused other people to
have
maybe more success in quitting their
addictions and then somebody else was
saying that
he had he had drank i won't give their
names because privacy reasons even
though they tweeted it
it's not it's not my business to tell
you their names
um another one said that as of today he
was going to stop
drinking 10 beers a day which he'd been
drinking
forever and today is the day that he's
going to stop drinking 10 beers a day
now that's pretty tough pretty tough
but i tweeted him so you can cheer him
on
uh lauren beaubert you all know lauren
she's a gun-toting new member of
congress republican and quite
interesting
quite interesting person she i did tweet
it so you'll see it
um she
she says the say she tweeted the same
people that thought lollapalooza was
just fine
meaning in terms of the covet uh are now
saying that sturgis will be a super
shredder disaster
do you think that's true do you think
the same people that thought
lollapalooza was just fine
are now saying that sturgis will be a
super spreader disaster
those people don't exist find me
somebody who said one of them was a
problem and one wasn't
find me that one person in the world who
says
that one group is a problem and one is
not that person doesn't exist
so much of our politics is about this
imaginary person
the imaginary person who's a hypocrite
doesn't exist
it's a whole political opinion about
imaginary people
why are we spending our time on
imaginary people could it be because we
don't have that many real problems
are we so far out of real problems you
literally have to make up an imaginary
person
describe them you're saying
you're saying obama yes yes i hear what
you're saying about obama and his
birthday hypocrisy
i usually don't do the hypocrisy topics
have you ever noticed that
have you noticed that even if the news
is just buzzing with the hypocrisy
topics i usually don't talk about them
because there's nothing to say
yeah you used to say this now you now
you say this now you're a liar
what else is there is there any depth to
that
would you learn anything nope
um so jim acosta went on what they call
an epic rant it's not a regular rant
it's epic it's an epic rant so jim
acosta on cnn
he went on his epic rant and
mocked desantis for desantis's
uh stand on the coronavirus and said
that
maybe we should call the next variant
the desantis variant
wow zing zing
you know who taught jim acosta this
technique who taught jim acosta
to cleverly brand people
to make their political careers less
successful who was it
i'm getting an image somebody orange
somebody that jim acosta doesn't like
that much that's right
jim acosta just became trump
he knew it was going to happen did let
me ask you this
in the time that you've known both
president trump and jim acosta
has trump in any way
become more like jim acosta i'll wait
i'll wait for your answer no no
but in the time that you've been
watching them
has jim acosta become more like trump
yes he has
talk about the ultimate revenge is
making your worst enemy
turn into you that's
that's a complete defeat that's that's
sort of uh
that's like killing somebody and
skinning them and wearing their skin as
a
as clothing that's as hard as you can be
somebody
turning them into you you can't win any
harder than that
but uh there's more to this story
why not call it the desantis variant
it's not very good is it
so you know when uh when trump does his
linguistic kill shots
like you repeat them and they're they're
kind of funny on the surface and they
they sort of like they hate you where it
hurts you know like
uh like low energy jab i mean that was
just
that was just like edward scissorhands
giving you a haircut kind of situation
and then jim's best play here is
about the dissenters variant
that's my dr evil
um how about that
the descent is very here's a little uh
linguistic trick for you things have to
sound right so this is one of the things
that trump gets right
that you don't know he's getting right
because you don't even know it's a thing
one of the things that trump gets right
is he uses words
that sound good together now you'll
never notice it
because he doesn't do it wrong if he
ever did it wrong you'd notice it
but because he never makes that mistake
he uses words that sound together
sound good when you put them together
you just don't notice how well he does
it but here's a cost of not doing it
well
the desantis variant
oh that's going to be viral it actually
was viral but only because
jim acosta said it but there's nothing
clever about that
the words desantis and
variant it doesn't they don't really fit
together do they
it's just one of these little things
that trump does perfectly all the time
and then you don't even notice it's the
thing you don't know it's a skill
because he never does it wrong but this
is obviously a skill because you
you can't imagine in any world that
trump himself
you know let's say he was on the other
side from desantis you can't imagine
that he would have come up with s
let's call the de santos variant it's
just too lame
because the words sound a little too i
don't know technical or something they
just don't have that
that populist punch but cnn's playbook
looks like this here's a thing they do
like to do
they like to identify a top gop
contender for the president
so they find out who's the most
dangerous republican
at the moment that's either trump or
desantis
would you all agree you know ted cruz
has been you know
sort of in that conversation and they
attack him but at the moment
desantis is i'd say the top contender
who's not
uh trump so they identify a top
contender and then they attack the
contender as
either being anti-science or racist they
have two arguments
and they will make those arguments no
matter what the facts
doesn't matter how many facts you have
they're just going to call you a racist
and anti-science no matter what
and then the third part is to produce an
epic
takedown get one of your hosts to do
something that's quote worthy in this
case
acosta so the cnn becomes the news
instead of the reporter of the news
that's right cnn makes themselves the
news
and then they report on it so basically
they're manufacturing news
so it's not really fake news it's more
like
manufactured news but
here's uh roly-poly user roly-poly
sent me some uh auto files
that let's see if i can play one of them
now i was trying to get a
like an introduction to my sections on
fake news so here's one
if i can play it
fake news
all right let's let's try another one
here
fake news tweet of the day i don't think
it was quite there it needs a little
work
needs a little work all right how about
this one um
this is for the desantis news
pretty good pretty good good start
thank you roly-poly um
user he's tweeting at me right now
isn't it freaky seeing uh yourself
mentioned
on on the live stream when you're
watching it and then
your name comes out so i've had this
happen to me a number of times
i'll turn on the television i'll just be
watching television and they start
talking about me
it's so freaky it's like no i'm watching
you
don't talk about me television so that
just happened to roly poly
so how many of you have heard the theory
that the therapeutics are being under
let's say under-appreciated officially
because if therapeutics existed for the
covent
legally we wouldn't be able to do an
emergency use
for some other drug if we already had a
drug that was
you know really helpful how many of you
heard that
and believe that that's true
how many of you are of the belief that
the reason we don't talk about
ivermectin
or hydroxychloroquine or now there's a
new one
a cholesterol drug cuts coronavirus
infection in a laboratory
by 70 and it's i guess it's an existing
fairly safe drug that's off the shelf so
it'd be a big deal
if it worked just like it would be a big
deal if any of the others worked
right so yeah regeneron is
isn't it regeneron approved i thought it
was
i mean as opposed to an emergency
approval
so i'm going to call fake news on that
i'm going to call that a conspiracy
theory that is not
backed up now i don't know and i'm going
to put odds on this right
so this doesn't mean i'm 100 sure
sometimes i act like i'm completely sure
what i'm not so
i'm trying to moderate that a little bit
so that i don't do that so much
here's my take on it let's say there was
a
law or a rule that said you can't get
your emergency
authorization for the vaccines if
therapeutics exist
and let's say in this scenario that
therapeutics did exist
let's say they did does that mean that
in the context
of a global pandemic
there's nothing you could do because the
the rule says
you can't authorize something for
emergency use
so you're done right you just can't do
it is that right
so you just can't do vaccines no
nothing works that way nothing works
that way
now there might be there's there's a
variant of this in which the
pharmaceutical companies are you know
bribing the government
but do you think that in the trump
administration
do you think trump took a bribe from the
pharma companies
that nobody's even suggested it right
and it would have to be trump
because he was the one beating up on the
fda to get the vaccinations through et
cetera
let me tell you this let's say there was
a rule
or a law or whatever it is i don't know
what the situation is it's either a rule
or a law
that you can't do the emergency use
thing as long as therapeutics exist
if you went to trump during the um or
any president
could be biden to you go to the
president whoever it is during a
pandemic and you say we've got this rule
that prevents us from doing this thing
that would be really really important to
do
how long does the rule stop you
it's it's over in a pandemic
that kind of rule doesn't mean anything
how many how many
rules did trump change just by signing
an executive order
did anybody question them no it's a
pandemic
i mean it's a different situation at the
moment right but during the
the worst of the pandemic we kind of
stand aside and say okay
leaders we understand this is not the
time to debate
this is the time to do something and we
know you're not going to be right every
time
like that would be unreasonable but but
do something because it's an emergency
you got to do something
under those rules there's no way that a
law
or some guideline or rule would have
stopped us from doing what made sense
so i'm going to call
on the on the idea that the reason
therapeutics are being
under undervalued by the government
is because they just had to get this
rule for the vaccinations
and maybe the farm big pharma was
pushing or bribing somebody
i'm not buying it i'm not buying it
because i don't think trump could have
been bribed
by pharma does anybody disagree with
that
does anybody think that trump
specifically trump
because he was the one there during the
time this was all happening
do you think he could have been bribed
by pharma
just i just don't see it right i just
don't see it
and and was there ever a rule that trump
didn't like breaking
i mean most of his act was tell me the
tell me the rule that's in the way and
then i'll break it
remember you couldn't do tele telehealth
having a doctor call you across state
lines and i was a little involved with
that
what did trump do he said oh here's a
law that's in the way
it's goodbye it's gone i don't believe
for a second
that trump was affected by big pharma
wanting
not to have therapeutics look good i
just don't think for a minute that
affected him
if it had been a different president
maybe maybe but i just don't see it
affecting trump
he's the guy who who just blows through
rules
he doesn't care yeah i mean trump
screwed the pharma companies during his
presidency
in a variety of ways and he did it right
in their face
so i don't think he was going to do it
because they wanted it that's for sure
here's one of those rules that i'll say
a million times because it's
so important you only manage
the things you track this is one of the
biggest deals in all of management in
fact
there's no such thing as management if
you're not tracking
because otherwise you're just flailing
around you don't know if the things you
do
are working or not working it's not
management
unless you can track oh we did this and
i got this result
so we should do more of it or less of it
based on the result
so um at this point
the way we track the covet stuff will
determine
what we do about it let me say that
again
you don't decide what to do about it and
then figure out how to track it
ideally i suppose you do it that way you
end up tracking whatever you can track
and then whatever it was that you could
track works backwards and then that's
what you managed to
which is a bad way to do business you
don't want to manage
to what you can measure because it's the
only thing you can measure
now in our case we're reporting i saw
this again california had
13 deaths yesterday from covent
allegedly
they did not report at the same time how
many of the 13
were
i just had a technical glitch on
locals platform but it's going to come
back in a second so
sorry youtube just a moment and i'll get
back to this story
i believe i can go right back to it
all right i'm back sorry locals a little
technical difficulty
uh that's the second time that's
happened um
so california reported 13 people died
yesterday of covid
but how many of them were vaccinated
don't you want to know that
like if the public is part of this
process
and should be i mean i don't think the
government should be making
decisions alone the the public opinion
and
the public feedback is part of the whole
process right that's
that's the way we run this stuff and if
the public doesn't get good information
or let's say
information that they can act on
productively
then you're not managing it's not that
you're doing it right or wrong you're
not doing it
let me say that again i'm not saying
that the government is managing covid
right or wrong
i'm saying they're not managing it
there's no stated strategy
and we're not we're not even tracking
the right stuff
because if you tracked how many people
died
who were vaccinated versus unvaccinated
that would tell you something
if the only if most of the people dying
are unvaccinated
why do i care
right in terms of you know living in
free society of course i care about
people
you know it would be individual
tragedies of course
but why would i care from a policy
perspective if these people
had access to the vaccinations chose not
to take them
got the result that you get if things go
wrong under that consideration why do i
care
i'm vaccinated i had access to it they
had access to it
as long as they have access to
vaccinations
i need to know how many died vaccinated
now
mark cuban you all know mark
tweeted at me he said scott period
you do realize that if say we got to 90
of people have vaccinated that it's
likely that around 90
of the hospitalizations and deaths would
be vaccinated
but the total number of hospitalizations
deaths would be about 90
lower than had people not been vaxxed so
he said do you realize this
yes yes yes i realize that i say it all
the time
and that doesn't change the request
to have accurate numbers right
so you all understand that if a hundred
percent of people were vaccinated
then every person who died from covet
after that point would be a vaccinated
person
and you would not conclude from that the
vaccinations don't work
you would say thank goodness it was only
five people
could have been thousands right so
mark your point is good but of course uh
i say this all the time
however if you had all of these numbers
you'd be in good shape
if you knew how many were vaccinated of
the deaths
and how many were unvaccinated and then
you also knew
you know what percentage of the country
or the state was vaccinated
you'd have everything you needed right
so yes
mark's point is good and you should all
be aware of it that's why i say it all
the time
if everybody's vaccinated then those are
the only people dying it doesn't mean
the vaccination doesn't work
so um tell me how many are unvaccinated
or don't let me
or don't imagine that i care um
cairo omega on or kira how do
you pronounce k-i-r-a kira
or kyra anyway sorry i'm mispronouncing
your name
kira but
she tweeted i'd frankly also like to see
stats for the different vaccines
administered
wouldn't you wouldn't you like to see
that
and why haven't you because it does seem
like a reasonable question
i would think that every person who gets
hospitalized with covent
should be asked are you vaccinated and
which one
and and how recently you know those are
the things we should be asking
i'm guessing we asked that but is it a
is it a
federal regulation it should be there
should be some federal regulation that
says you have to ask that and report it
now i would say that maybe there was a
reason we didn't report that before
because remember you you only get
in terms of managing you only get what
you measure
suppose we had measured that from the
start
the differences in vaccination results
what would that have done because that's
what you're measuring and what you
measure causes you to act differently
i think it would have caused fewer
vaccinations
in the beginning because there was a
availability
problem so if you could get any one of
the vaccinations you'd get it
you didn't want people shopping which is
sort of what i was doing
i was kind of shopping that's why i
waited so long i was waiting to see if
any of the vaccinations were duds
or if there's any surprises so i waited
as long as i could to get as much
information you know a few months
but at this point now that anybody can
get a vaccination
you could probably shop couldn't you
don't you think that
maybe you'd get a few more people
vaccinated if that was your goal
by telling them okay we've got different
vaccinations we did find this one's five
percent better
and maybe some people would say oh okay
i feel
i feel like you know more about the
vaccinations so
i'll give it a shot i'll give it a shot
wrong um dr eli
david not a medical doctor but another
kind of smart doctor
was tweeting there's a new peer-reviewed
paper showing the aerosols play a major
role in covet transmission
and fine aerosols constitute 85 of viral
load detected
and he says that masks can drop can
block
droplets not aerosols so it's time to
abolish all non-scientific
mask mandates to which i say
the same things i always said if you
have data
from a laboratory experiment which is
what this is i believe
and you also have laboratory from the
field or you have data from the field
which one do you look at you got two
sets of data
in the laboratory they say huh we're not
sure these masks are working
but in the real world they're working in
other words where there are masks that
can measure that there's
more of a benefit now is
any of that data accurate who knows
we're in a world where you can't trust
anything you can't trust that the masks
work you can't trust that they don't
work
you definitely can't trust a laboratory
study so here's what i would tell you
i would never look at a peer-reviewed
which is different than a randomized
controlled trial
i would never look at it just a
peer-reviewed paper that said that we
tested something in a laboratory
and found out that there's a lot of
aerosols
that matter we kind of already knew that
that the aerosols matter
and we also knew that the mass were
never intended to stop a hundred percent
of anything
they were they were they were supposed
to stop some
some amount of it during the worst of
the pandemic
now i'm anti-mass mandate
just to be clear because it sounds like
i'm being pro-masculine
but i think you can have the nuanced
opinion the masks make some difference
but overall they're not worth it because
your lifestyle would be so
affected by it so that's my my point of
view
i believe that mass almost certainly
makes some difference
let me put it this way if you knew you
were in a room with people who had
coveted
let's say you knew there was one person
in the room and you're going to talk to
all of them one by one
would you want the person who is talking
to you from three feet away and facing
you to be wearing a mask
or not yeah
right how often before the masks were a
big thing
were you talking to somebody and you
could feel their spittle in your face
you know what i'm talking about you can
feel the spindle hitting you in the face
i feel like if somebody has covet i
don't want their spittle hitting my face
and the mask would make some difference
right so i think you can be
uh scientific enough to say masks to
make a difference
at the same time you can say maybe we've
reached the point where if
unvaccinated people want to take the
chance let them do it and vaccinated
people too
so remember vaccinated people are
getting the virus now
so don't forget that
um
let's see barnes posted a link on a
randomized control trial
that should statistically give rules
that ivormectin was effective at
treating covet
interesting so um somebody's saying that
uh
uh barnes has posted a and
you can see uh viva and barnes uh their
podcast is great by the way it's one of
the best ones
you should watch on youtube and or
locals i think you can see it on both
platforms
twitch too maybe um
but this is news i haven't heard before
so i'm just seeing it in a comment on
locals
that uh there might be some new news on
ivermectin
all right um
all right is there anything i missed
i said uh viva and barnes
um i'm going to look at your comments
here for a moment
corey bush yeah i don't have much to say
about her i know what you're talking
about but
um yes there's a story about
a police officer who almost od'd on
fentanyl without taking any
was just around it and just sniffed it
that happens to
drug dogs too if a drug dog sniffs
fentanyl
dog's dead um
how did a guy like you get a girl like
christina
you know you're not the first person to
ask
but why isn't anybody asking how a girl
like christina got a great guy like me
could it be my looks could be
all right that's about all i got for
today and i will talk to you
tomorrow