STEM. But I'm going to give you my speculation and it goes like this. It's super sexist. Are you ready? I don't think women have the same biological aptitude for military security. I don't think women have the same biological aptitude for military security.

Here's what I mean by that. Only men know how deadly men are. Women can observe it and they can be victims of it but they can't truly understand that we're all killers. And that if you put us in a situation where we can kill our enemies we sort of do it. And if you look at the Palestinian situation one interpretation would be the female interpretation would be hey if you could just be nicer to the Palestinians then the Palestinians would calm down and the violence would stop and everybody would win. So let's just give the Palestinians their own homeland give them the things they want and we'll be able to solve these problems.

I believe that men have a completely different biological military security opinion and it goes like this. Whoever has the power in the Middle East to wipe out the other side is going to wipe out the other side. So your only choices are do you want it to be somebody who is your ally or somebody who wants to wipe out you next? Now we can't say these things out loud but we kind of know it. We know it. And I don't think women know it. I think women are still trapped in the well of course they're angry and of course they're going to act out because you're not being nice to them. If you would just treat them right then I think everybody would just hold hands and get along. And men say I don't think you understand what's happening there at all. We're killers. And in the Middle East both sides are pretty deadly. And if the Palestinians got everything they wanted I think women would be surprised and men would not.

So I do think there's a biological difference in just understanding how deadly men are. And I think that you just have to be a man to understand that. Same way I mean you can reverse it easily. I don't think men should be involved in abortion decisions. You can be. It's legal and you have a right to it but I don't feel like I could understand it the same way a woman could understand it. So let them make the decision. That's just one example. So I'm just speculating but that's what it feels like to me.

Tulsi Gabbard is going to release over 6,000 files on the RFK assassination. I'm going to make a prediction. You're not going to learn anything new. I really don't think any of these document releases are going to be really super telling us anything we didn't know from the Kennedys to Epstein to anything else for all the obvious reasons. You know if it really mattered it would already be deleted or wouldn't be in the records at all.

But it's kind of interesting that RFK Jr. who has looked into it quite a bit as you'd imagine is not entirely convinced that Sirhan Sirhan was the killer. And if you've heard any of the speculation and talk about the murder there is all kinds of stuff that doesn't make sense. Like too many bullets were fired and from the wrong direction and there's just all kinds of stuff in that story that doesn't make sense. But on the other hand there were so many witnesses. There's like just tons of witnesses. Is it possible that none of the witnesses had the right story? Maybe. I mean it's not impossible but it seems unlikely.

On the other hand is anything that's important in our history real? Probably not. There's probably nothing in our history that you think is settled history except for maybe names and dates like we know RFK's name and we know the date of the event but probably that's the only thing that's real. I mean it might be like everything else which is not real. It's just the version we got fed. But I don't think the documents that we have on file redacted or not are going to make any difference to that.

Meanwhile the Post Millennial is reporting that US attorney John Sarcone is going to be part of looking into Letitia James mortgage fraud. So the FBI has opened a formal criminal probe into Letitia James over her own real estate related transactions which at least on paper look obviously illegal. We'll see what the courts decide.

But here's the good news bad news. The good news is I'm very happy that Letitia J