Back to episode — Episode 2582 CWSA 08/30/24
Context —
government instruments? Who does that? Well you don't do that with your important money do you except very short term to make sure it doesn't disappear. It's not any kind of a long-term investment that makes sense except as a small part of your portfolio. So I just have a sort of a curiosity. Don't put this don't assume this as a recommendation so let me soften it a little bit. I'm not saying we s…
← Previous segment →was very involved in making sure that Brazil had access to voting machines. Why would the US be so concerned that Brazil had access to voting machines? And apparently the US intervened with at least two different manufacturers of microchips to make sure that the voting machines for Brazil went higher on the priority so they could get chips for their voting machines. And then the CIA according to Mike Benz and he shows the documents by the way this is not Mike Benz making stuff up in his post he's showing you the actual documents and the current reporting at the time so this is just documented that the CIA warned Bolsonaro the last leader of Brazil not to mess with or cast doubt on the new US State Department secured voting machines. So they threatened him not to cast doubt on the voting machines while making sure that they definitely had some voting machines.
Now let me ask the question I've asked many times by now you have a good answer for me because I've been asking it for so long and you thought about it and then you researched it now you have a good answer. What's the advantage of the voting machines? Is it because they're more credible the public will trust them? No no evidence of that. It's the opposite. Are they to save money? No no evidence that it saves money. Are they to make things easier? No they obviously make it harder. Is it to get a faster result so you don't have to wait? No probably is the other way around or at least as fast. So why was the United States trying so hard to make sure Brazil had voting machines? What can you think of a second reason? Because we can speculate about one potential reason you know without evidence I don't have any evidence of this but
Context —
it looks exactly like the United States tried to install their own leader a preferred leader via the mechanism of having voting machines that maybe they had some back door to. I don't know that that's true. In other words there's no hard evidence of anything so I can't point to any evidence for it but why would the United States care so much about another country's voting machines so much so that…
Next segment → →