Back to episode — Episode 2555 CWSA 08/03/24
Context —
go to Trump and he'll make some terrible accusation and then she won't necessarily respond to it directly. She will just say what she says about the topic. And then when it's done the media will say my God that was a masterful, I don't know why people said she's not good at this. She's the greatest debater. She had her prosecutor hat on. And the media will say that she won in a landslide even if s…
← Previous segment →is one is rumored to be super smart compared to the current one, that the government has to see it first. Why do you suppose that is? Let me say it again. No government can survive an honest news environment. That's why there are no honest news environments. No government, democratic, no government, dictator, none. If the news started telling the truth it'd be hard to stay in power, hard to win an election. So you really need at least some part of the news to be completely illegitimate otherwise you can't stay in power.
So when you see that the AI which will be in the future will be our only source of information, everything you know in the future will be talking to AI. You're not going to Google search for stuff if AI can just do it for you. So I think the government needs to control AI's answers and it needs to make sure the AI will brainwash you the way you have been brainwashed so far. And they got to make sure that it doesn't tell you the truth because no government can handle the truth in the long run. So I think this is exactly what it looks like. It's the government forcing OpenAI to add lies to their algorithm otherwise they won't be allowed to operate. I don't know. It can't really go any other way by the way.
So if you're thinking to yourself well that's too far Scott, it can't actually go any other way. The government cannot survive. Guarantee they can't survive if AI is just honest and tells us the truth. That's the reason that all of your searches are so obviously brainwashing propaganda. Government can't survive with the truth.
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway apparently has sold a bunch of its Apple stuff in the second quarter. Now I also sold much of my Apple stake in the second quarter. I don't know if their reason is the same as mine but to me Apple went from kind of a monopoly that nobody could touch to something closer to a jump ball because of AI. So Apple still is not nailing their AI strategy. They might. I mean if you had to bet I'd be
Context —
more likely to bet they do than don't. But at the moment they look weak and I would guess that some upstart could come up with a phone that uses AI as its base mechanism and just put them out of business. So I don't give stock advice so I'm not telling you to sell your Apple. If I had held mine I would have made a lot more money because it's much higher than when I sold it. So if you take my advi…
Next segment → →