isagree this would work. It's not because of efficiency. It's not because of timing. It's not because of credibility. There actually is no reason to do it the way we do it unless the whole purpose is cheating. It's designed to be impossible to audit. It's designed to be easier to cheat the mail-in ballots. So it's exactly what it looks like.

And by the way I'm not speculating about this. So the other things I said, you know, like well it seems like the CIA is behind it, that's speculation based on the best information I have. But when I look at the election I'm not speculating. I can tell you with certainty that if you design elections this way and then you let it continue despite all the public outcry about this not being good enough, you've designed it for cheating. There's no — there is no second argument. It is designed for cheating. And we need to stop saying there's any other reason. It's not because Democrats disagree. It's not because we think there's other factors in play. No, there's only literally one reason.

And here's the interesting thing. Nobody even argues that there's a better reason other than the fake one that is suppressing voters. The suppressing voters thing is — nobody thinks that's true, do they? If you ever met anybody who thought their vote was suppressed ever, have you ever met one person who thought their own vote was in some way suppressed? I've never even heard of it. It's so a thing. Or that Black people can't get IDs. I mean Black people mock that as they should, as they should. Super racist on the Democrats' part.

So no, let's stop pretending that the elections are designed to be efficient or make it all fair for everybody. It's not. It's very clearly not designed for that. So no, that'll — none of those things will ever happen.

Trump wants to kill the FISA. Is the FISA being re-upped? Is that what it is? So FISA where you can spy on an American if that American had contact with a foreigner. So since they're allowed to spy on the foreigner but it would be helpful to see both sides of the conversation, that gives them a back door to spy on Americans. They just have to get that American to talk to one person overseas. Have I talked to one person in another country? Yes I have in my last several years. Have I ever exchanged a message with somebody in another country who had any political abilities? Yes, yes I have. Now was I doing anything nefarious? No, no, just ordinary conversations and politics and stuff, the same thing I do with anybody. But that would give the government the full ability to monitor everything I do, I think, right?

If I had any conversation with anybody that they say, oh this Australian you talk to, I don't know, even though they're an ally, you did talk to an Australian and we've got some questions. That's exactly what they can do. They can get into all of my business. If an Australian sends me a message on WhatsApp, I think that's true. Am I wrong about that? That all it would take is one Australian to send me a message on WhatsApp and they can get all of my communications? That's all it would take.

How hard would it be for them to talk an Australian into sending me a message? Pretty easy. Pretty easy. That'd be the easiest nudge of all time.

So Trump's against it. MTG seems to be against it. But the leader Johnson apparently wants to keep it. So I have questions about Speaker Johnson. And I'd like to renew my hypothesis that our leaders start out with good intentions but when they reach the highest levels such as a speaker of the house or a president, I believe somebody pulls them aside. I think in the real world somebody pulls them aside and says, look, here's all the stuff the public doesn't know and you don't know either. Here's why we do these things and here's why you can't change it. And then they go, oh God, I can't explain this. So they say, well good luck. So you're going to have to lie because you can't tell them the truth. The way the real world works is really naughty and dirty and terrible. But it's not going to change. It's going to stay naughty and dirty and terrible. And you're going to have to lie to the public and tell them it's some other reason. And it's the only way we can operate. It's the only way we've ever operated. We don't tell people these things until they reach your job. But it's now your job, Speaker of the House, to prevent the public from knowing what's going