o a political thing, but you know it could hide under the misinformation umbrella. So it had a stated mission but got to the secret mission below it.

And 22 million tweets were labeled misinformation. A lot of them probably were, so I'm not saying that it was completely fake because they wanted to have an air of legitimacy. So if you fact-checked a lot of stuff that was fake you get yourself some legitimacy while you could also fact-check things that weren't fake. So they were suppressing everything from posts to YouTube channels, and a bunch of people that you would be familiar with if you follow social media were on these lists and they were literally targeted. And I guess there was a flow of taxpayer funds of $40 million to this collective octopus of censorship.

Now these are things that we know, so this seems to be completely well documented that the Democrats literally built a censorship machine that was primarily for political reasons. And the stated reason for doing it all was we can't let what happened in 2016 happen again, which is a Republican winning the election, and also Brexit. They said it directly. Now how much outrage would you have for this story if it were the only outrage? If this were the only outrage, man would I be outraged. Oh man, I would be so outraged. But it's like my fifth one today. Like I have so little outrage left. Just a little bit. I'm worrying about UFOs, damn it.

All right, speaking of outrage, speaking of disinformation, I saw an article by P. Goslin in something called — let's see, didn't get the publication — but it goes down the list of all the reasons that the climate is doing the opposite of what people thought. So one of the facts is that plants have absorbed 20% more carbon dioxide than we thought, or will do more. So apparently the models were off by 20% on the carbon dioxide. Do you know how big of a mistake that is? 20% on the CO2, that's really big. But also Arctic sea ice is above average. Just hold that in your mind. Arctic sea ice is above average at the moment. That's like the number one thing that was the number one thing we were looking for. It's like, well that Arctic sea ice, that's telling you everything you need to know, isn't it? It's a little bit above average. And a whole bunch of places are having a really good ski season. Do you know why there's a really good ski season this year? It's colder than average.

Yeah, now I'm not going to be the one who tells you that a cold season means there's no climate change because you know one season doesn't mean anything. But my point is that we now have something like, correct me if I'm wrong, 30 or 40 years of wildly wrong climate predictions. Is that fair? Maybe 40 years of totally wrong climate predictions. Can I say that as just a fact? 40 years of totally wrong climate predictions. Yeah. Do you think that if you said climate change wasn't a big risk that this big censorship consortium would have said oh that's a good opinion, or would they have silenced you for your misinformation? I'm pretty sure they would have silenced you for your misinformation. Just think about that. The things that they were silencing you for are the things you were most right about. COVID and climate change. The two things you were most right about. Amazing. Amazing.

All right. As Glenn Greenwald points out, and I love how he summarizes things. He's such a good summarizer of what's happening. So you should definitely follow Glenn Greenwald. But he says that he posted this today. Just a reminder that the Democratic Party's primary strategy for 2024 presidential election is to do everything possible to imprison their leading opponent and work with corporate media once again in a dual strategy of fraud, Russiagate, and censorship, Hunter Biden docs. That does feel like exactly what's happening.

Now under normal circumstances, if there were no other outrageous stories, how outraged would you be to know for sure that the Democrats are running a campaign to try to imprison u