ddress this. How can Dominion and Smartmatic sue Mike Lindell for being wrong about his claims about the election unless they make their code public? How? How does this work?

How in the world can they sue him with his claim? Would presumably, I would assume, that his claims would include some allegations about what happens with the code, you know, the actual programming code. Isn't that part of it? Now maybe that's not part of the claim. Maybe the claim has something independent so you don't have to look at it. But I would think that would be the most logical way this goes, right?

The most logical way is that his lawyers get to see the code and he would have experts to be able to look at it and see if there's anything wrong. Now I don't think there's any way that these companies can reveal their code because, forget about even whether there's something that they need to cover up, I don't have any reason to believe that, but it seems like it'd be proprietary at the very least. They wouldn't want to release it for competitive reasons.

So I don't know how he loses. Can anybody, I'm not a lawyer, but I don't see how you lose if the main piece of evidence you're not willing to share