. And then they're mocking Trump. The news is just mocking him for saying it. And then Trump saying he thinks it's less than 1% based on what? His hunch. Just based on a hunch, right, when all the experts. And then of course the punchline is that the experts changed to half of 1% and lower I think now. So Trump was 100% right from the get-go. Why? Probably because he didn't trust big organizations and experts.

Yeah. So when you see Trump's instincts, and let's say climate change, when Trump said climate change is a hoax, I'm sure that what he actually meant was the whole rigmarole around it. I don't think he was specifically talking about the science claims that CO2 could cause warming. I think he was talking about the whole situation like Vivek. But Vivek adds agenda so it's more clear until Aaron Rupar takes it out.

So what if the same hunch that we see Trump being right about all the time and it's based on not trusting experts, what if he's right about his other hunches? Election. I mean anything could happen. Anything could happen.

All right. You may have heard me say that it's necessary to do a RICO case against Democrat leadership because at this point it appears that there is an organized group, probably the same group largely that has been running everything from the fine people hoax to the Russia collusion hoax, the laptop hoax, the drinking bleach hoax, the you name it, the insurrection hoax. And it's all the same cast of characters. They have money involved, jobs, power, money. So there's a financial interest. They're organized. And this was my claim. My claim is that now it's very clear with the things that we all know, all right, no speculation, just the things that we know for sure, it looks exactly like a RICO organized criminal organization.

Now before you say but the Republicans do the same thing, I would say no. Republican voters do the same thing. Do you see the difference? One of the examples somebody gave me in a counterargument was what abo