Back to episode — Episode 1994 Scott Adams - Crowder, WEF And More
Context —
ing. It's a big deal. And I love the fact that when we talk about the states being the laboratory for the country this is exactly what we're talking about, right? Let a few smart states try something. They probably won't execute the same way. See if anybody can nail it. If anybody nails it maybe we know in five to seven years and then we can start copying it. It's pretty good. That's a pretty good…
← Previous segment →double check that gun? Like nobody's going to learn anything if he goes to jail. There's no learning that will happen. So and his ideology is going to be like reformed so if he makes another movie he won't make that same mistake again. There's just nothing. There's just no benefit.
Now if you say that the family of the deceased should sue him and get a bunch of money I think that already happened didn't it? And that feels like the right domain. You know maybe there's financial compensation but I don't know. Jail doesn't make sense.
Now let me
Context —
make a completely different switch. My argument, yeah your head's going to spin here. He was also the head of the production. As the head of the production it looks like he really effed up. It looks like he just didn't do the job of a boss to make sure the right people were in place and the right processes. That's harder to defend, right? The asking a non-gun owner actor in the context of a fictio…
Next segment → →