ed out how to reverse aging with an injection. So now they've actually done it with animals and I guess they can, you apparently it looks really good. They can actually reverse aging. Apparently it's real in animals and there's good reason to believe it would work in humans.

Now you live in the simulation and you know the simulation is designed for the most entertaining outcome. What do you think those injections are made from? Anybody want to guess what would be the most messed up thing that you could learn next? Got it? Yeah see how easy this is. See once you realize that our reality is apparently scripted for the funniest outcomes. Yes of course it's related to the mRNA. Of course it is. Why wouldn't it be that the one thing that everyone would want, everyone would want if it worked right? Everyone would want and it just happens to be mRNA based technology.

Now seriously you could see this coming right from a mile away. Like as soon as I told you there's an injection that was guaranteed wasn't it? Because who would write it any other way if you're writing the script like a reality show? The producers would say "Huh it's an injection. You know it would be good. Why don't we see if we can make them take the technology that they all abhor." And let's have all the people who are the so-called anti-vaxxers because you know again this is not my opinion this is what the best story would look like. The best story would be that all the anti-vaxxers start looking old and all the people who took the injection start getting younger. And then what are they going to do?

But to be clear the technology apparently is solid. The mRNA platform basic technology is different from a vaccination for COVID right and it's not the same thing. So if you start with the base technology then what you add on top of it is the dangerous stuff in theory right? And they could both be dangerous I suppose but what they added to make it a COVID vaccination is what we suspect might be the riskier part not the technology. So apparently the technology is pretty well understood. It's just what you do with it that gets you to the riskier territory.

And my understanding is there are a number of cancer treatments coming online. I don't know where they are in the testing sequence. They're all based on the same technology. So apparently the technology has all kinds of promise. We may be too biased against it because of the vaccination experience.

There's also new technology. The researchers at University of Washington found a way to identify Alzheimer's before you get it. So they can determine that there's a build up of something that pretty much guarantees you can have some form of cognitive decline.

Now it's sort of a technical story and I'm really not the best one to explain science to you know that right? So I'd like to explain this in the simplest possible way so you can understand how this early Alzheimer identification works. So stick with me. I'll try to keep this really just simple in layman's terms.

So you've got a soluble oligomer that binds to the assay and they use that to exploit a property of the toxic oligomers. And when those are misfolded the amyloid beta proteins begin to clump into oligomers and they might form a structure known as an alpha sheet. But the alpha sheets are not normally found in nature so you gotta create these alpha sheets which tend to bind to other alpha sheets and that at the heart of the method really. There's a synthetic alpha sheet