Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive August 22, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #1574 Segments
MainContent Climate & Environment

Back to episode — Episode 1574 Scott Adams - Today's Live Stream Will Be Exceptional

Context —

eapon that's behind it all. Now there might be something that's behind it all. Might be some kind of electronics that are common to embassies that have some sonic problem to them or something. But I think I'm also the only person in the country who predicted that. Am I right? I didn't hear anybody else in the country predict that you would never find the sonic weapon. Haven't found it yet. So I li…

← Previous segment →

ount of industrial stuff happened by people. Humans put off heat. Well maybe you mean the human causation part. I don't know what you're debunking there but let me go on.

So it puts the believers in climate science in kind of a bind because if this study is right it means that everything that they thought about climate change, at least the modeling part of it, just the modeling part, was wrong. But if it's not true that means climate science is not true because this is also done by science, right? So if it turns out that this science is wrong what other science is wrong? So you can either doubt the models or you can doubt climate science itself. It's a real problem. And I don't hear anybody else talking about it. Do you? Have you heard anybody else talking about this study and what it does to the entire body of climate science modeling? Yeah, I think it's just going to disappear as a topic.

All right, here's my provocative thought of the day. Apparently we're hearing the reports especially from the UK but I think it would be true in America that there's just this huge problem of sexual abuse of women in the military. Now not going to make light of that. Nobody should. But I am very bothered by not just the fact that it's a brutal crime. So I'm not just bothered by that. I'm bothered by the fact that — correct me if I'm wrong — but the women in the military are trained to kill, are they not? They don't separate the women and say oh you can learn to cook. Isn't everybody in the military trained to kill? Am I wrong about that? Is there any exception to that? I think they all use firearms. They're all trained in it. I mean at different levels, right? Marines are trained to kill really hard but everybody's trained to kill or at least defend themselves. Am I right?

So here's my problem. If you put somebody in the military or they join the military, you train them to kill people who deserve to be killed, I think they should have special dispensation to be able to kill their sexual accusers or abusers. Not accusers. I think a woman in the military should be able to hunt down and murder a sexual abuser even if it's next week or next year. Now in a practical sense you could never have that law. I'm aware of that. But I feel like it would be justice. If we're going to train people to kill and we're training to kill people who deserve to be killed and they meet one of these people who deserves to be killed right up close, I say they can kill them in their sleep. I'm okay with that. Don't train people to kill and t

Context —

hen rape them and don't expect them to kill the person who raped them. That's not fair either. Don't train them to kill or let them kill because some people are worth killing. All right, that's not a serious point but it could be. Lauren Boebert — is it Boebert or Bobert? She's got a bert at the end of her name so I'm automatically — I like her because of Dilbert, Dogbert, Boebert anyway. So she'…

Next segment → →