Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive August 22, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #924

Episode 924 Scott Adams - Learn the User Interface For Reality

Episode #924 Apr 19, 2020 40:03 22,999 views

My new book LOSERTHINK, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/rqmjc2a Content: Dan Crenshaw interview by Bill Maher Vitamins and coronavirus Rethinking restaurant concepts Whiteboard: Filters of Reality Sleeping tips ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like my channel to have a wider audience and higher production quality, please donate via my startup (Whenhub.com) at this link: https://interface.my/ScottAdamsSays I use donations to pay for the daily conversions of the original Periscope videos into Youtube and podcast form, and to improve my production quality and search results over time.  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please subscribe to my channel…it REALLY helps. Like my video? Hate my video? Let me know, VOTE! Please leave a comment, let me know how I'm doing. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Opening General Commentary

Hey everybody, come on in. We've got some stuff to talk about. Good stuff, fun stuff, things that will blow your mind, possibly delight you, possibly blow your mind and then delight you. It's all happening here. I don't know if it's morning or evening. I'm going to put down my shades. Let's see if…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

I was watching the interview that Bill Maher did with Dan Crenshaw. You know Dan Crenshaw, and if you know who Dan Crenshaw is, you know that he's probably one of the better communicators on the right, probably in the top five or so. You put him in there with Matt Gaetz and Tucker Carlson and a few…

View segment →
MainContent Health & Biohacking

A lot of people asked me for the last few weeks to talk about Dr. Shiva's ideas of treating coronavirus and I hadn't really looked into them until today. So I have a preliminary opinion. My preliminary opinion is that in essence what he's promoting, or not promoting, it doesn't have any money in it…

View segment →
MainContent Systems vs Goals

I did some restaurant reopening ideas which I would like to share with you for those of you who didn't see it. So here's the starting point. One of the creative mistakes we make is to say hey let's what could we do to get our restaurants back to where they always were. You fall for hoaxes. Blog not…

View segment →
MainContent Career & Life Strategy

All right I promised you that I would give you the user interface for reality and I'm working on a book idea. An awful writer do not but it has to do with filters. And I was trying to think of all the different filters that one can put on life. And I've argued that if you have experience in enough d…

View segment →
Closing Hypnosis & Influence

All right I was asked to give you some sleeping tips for tonight and I'm going to do that and I'm going to do it more easily this time. So those of you who don't want to get sleepy yet you might want to sign off now and I wish you a good night. Maybe I'll see you in the morning. I hope so. Those of…

View segment →

Hey everybody, come on in. We've got some stuff to talk about. Good stuff, fun stuff, things that will blow your mind, possibly delight you, possibly blow your mind and then delight you. It's all happening here.

I don't know if it's morning or evening. I'm going to put down my shades. Let's see if I look more handsome when there's less light on me, because I think I do, if you know what I mean. All right, let's get to it. Yeah, let's get to it.

Christina, nice of you to join.

I was watching the interview that Bill Maher did with Dan Crenshaw. You know Dan Crenshaw, and if you know who Dan Crenshaw is, you know that he's probably one of the better communicators on the right, probably in the top five or so. You put him in there with Matt Gaetz and Tucker Carlson and a few other people. So less light, much less light, would be much better anyway.

If you watch the interview, it's going around the internet, and people were saying that Crenshaw dismantled Bill Maher and everything. But here's what I saw. Now of course I can't read minds, but here's some speculation, and you can decide how close this sounds to you. Does this seem reasonable to you?

Bill Maher probably hears a lot of arguments that agree with the left. He probably hears them all the time. But I'll bet he doesn't hear many good arguments from the right. He probably hears the one pundit that CNN allows to be on their air every ten minutes or every ten days or something. And he probably samples a little bit of the stuff that clips and League quotes taken out of context and stuff. But I'll bet that Bill Maher, and this is just speculation through no fault of his own, probably has a gigantic blind spot for what the good arguments are on the right.

I've noticed this a few times. It doesn't ever seem as though Bill Maher is disagreeing with the best arguments on the right. But of course he's disagreeing with the dumb ones that don't make any sense. And the reason I'm somewhat more fascinated with Bill Maher is I've been watching him for years and I know that he is capable of changing his mind under the right circumstances, so long as there's a good argument and some data.

If you've watched him forever, you know that he's fair to people on both the left and the right. He can be maddeningly frustrating because he doesn't just automatically agree with one team. And so everybody finds some reason to be mad at one thing or another.

Here's what I saw, and I think that Bill Maher got a little flavor of this one. I was on his show back in 2016 I guess. And it goes like this. I think that when Dan Crenshaw started talking, it looked like you could see in Bill's face that he was learning for the first time that there's another curtain behind the curtain.

In other words, somebody as tuned in as Bill Maher can not only see the show that everybody sees, the one that's in public, but he's one of the few people who can look behind the curtain. And I think he thought that if he could see the show and that he could also look behind the curtain, that's all there is to see.

And I feel as if what I was watching, and again this requires a lot of speculation and assumption on my part, but it felt like what I was seeing was that Bill Maher was learning from Dan Crenshaw's better communicating that there was a curtain behind the curtain. That there might be a whole bunch of stuff, who knows how big, might be a little, might be a lot. But it was like Bill was for the first time hearing something that made sense that was coming from the other team. And I think it made him think, is there something here?

Now if it had been anybody else they would just be dismissing it because it's just team sport. But what makes somebody like a Bill Maher, and I would say Sam Harris would be in the same category even if you don't agree I think he is, is people who can change their mind. They just have to hear a better argument, see facts to support it.

So that was fascinating. A lot of people asked me for the last few weeks to talk about Dr. Shiva's ideas of treating coronavirus and I hadn't really looked into them until today. So I have a preliminary opinion.

My preliminary opinion is that in essence what he's promoting, or not promoting, it doesn't have any money in it as far as I know, but what he's recommending is that some kind of an intensive vitamin treatment with specific vitamins, I think A and D and C, would make a big difference in the coronavirus. You're treating it.

Now here's the thing. I have to give you some background. Some of you know years ago I tried to start a food company making this burrito product that I tried to stuff with all the vitamins and minerals you would need for the whole day. I thought, wouldn't that be great? You could eat a delicious burrito and make sure you've got all your vitamins and minerals so even if the rest of the day didn't go well, you'd be set.

And in that process what I learned is that the science of nutrition is largely made up. It's just all garbage. And the science of vitamins and minerals is extra garbage. So part of the reason that I ended up bailing out is that I couldn't make a product with a claim that hey it's got these vitamins and minerals if all the science was evaporating behind me.

When I started it I thought the science was pretty solid but there was honestly just an assumption. I just assumed we knew the vitamins are good for you, right? Did you assume that science knows if vitamins are good for you and which ones and how much? There's no such thing. The science of vitamins is largely just ridiculousness.

Now I'm not saying that vitamins have no value. Obviously you need your vitamin C so you don't get scurvy. Vitamin D probably does have all kinds of benefits, etc. So some of the basics we certainly know. But beyond the basics it's just the Wild West.

So I may be biased by the fact that I spent time in this domain of vitamins and what I found is that it was all charlatans and garbage. That was my experience. Now does that mean that the next thing that comes up is untrue because all the last stuff was? It doesn't mean that at all.

So I'm confessing my bias. So hear this part really clearly. My bias is that when I hear a remarkable sounding claim involving ordinary vitamins, even at high dosages or even if they're intravenous, but if I hear something that's an extraordinary claim about vitamins, I just assume it's not true. Okay, so that's my starting point.

Let me give you an analogy to make my point. If you get an email from a Nigerian prince who says he can get his money back from a bank if you help him out, do you need to know if that's real? Do you need to research it? Do you need to ask for identification? No you don't, because it's an email from a Nigerian prince. That whole category is very unlikely ever to produce a real one.

Might there be, I mean I can't say there will never ever be a Nigerian prince who's in really got some trouble and you could help him if you just return his email. I'm not saying it's impossible. I'm just saying I've never seen it.

So if somebody tomorrow says hey, I know these have mostly been not true but have you seen this email? It's from a Nigerian prince and I know, I know, I know why you're saying that all those other ones were not real but I feel good about this one.

So analogies of course are imperfect and therefore it's one of the reasons that they never persuade anybody and I'm sure I didn't persuade you with that one. The point is I'm biased. The point is not that you should believe it's real or not real based on that story. The point is I'm biased.

And so when I see a remarkable claim that has this form, it's very remarkable and suspiciously the medical community is ignoring this claim and or is unfamiliar with it. So if it's a remarkable claim about vitamins and the other claim is that the medical community is missing this obvious thing, it's sort of in the category of things that are never true. But again this could be the one time. Maybe it is.

So I tweeted it out. Dr. Shiva had some exchanges with something. I tweeted it out because it had links and description of why he was talking about it and asked any experts to give me an opinion whether it looked real.

Now if some experts comment and say Scott, Scott, Scott, he's on to something, well I'm open to changing my mind. I could definitely change my mind. I would just have to hear somebody smart say oh yeah yeah I get it. All the other Nigerian princes were fake but honestly this one looks pretty good. If somebody says that I'll reconsider.

But so the question is out there. Now I saw in the comments somebody says you should debate Dr. Shiva. Are you kidding? Are you kidding? What good would that do me debating Dr. Shiva?

Let me do the debate for you so that you don't have to sit through it. I will now act out me debating Dr. Shiva on this topic. This first I'll do the role of Dr. Shiva. Blah blah something I don't understand meaning Scott doesn't understand and vitamins and stuff and science and I have multiple degrees from MIT.

And then it's my turn to debate and I say I know I didn't understand any of that. Honestly babe I don't even know where do we go from here because I don't even know what those words mean. Do you have a book or something I could read to learn about this microbiology stuff and immunology and virology and statistics? If I do a little studying I'll get a little studying and then we can have this debate again. But at the moment I don't know what any of those words mean so we're not getting anywhere.

You see there would be no point in a debate, right? Because I would say it's my bias that these things are usually not true and then what would he say? Well I can see why you would have that bias based on your experience. Right, that's sort of the beginning and the end of the debate. Because I think Dr. Shiva would say well of course you've just admitted that you have a bias. I can see the reason you would have a bias, your experience. Of course you have a bias that way. That's it. That's the whole debate. We're done now because I don't understand his points. That's why I asked for somebody else to explain it to me.

All right. I think what triggered me is that in Dr. Shiva's tweet he made an assumption about Bill Gates's motives, Bill Gates's internal thoughts. And if you pair something that looks sketchy just by its nature, even if it's not, it just looks sketchy because of its nature, and you add that to conspicuous public mind reading, well that does not help your credibility. Because it seemed like that was important, that it would require knowing what Bill Gates was thinking and that what he was thinking was he was trying to make money with vaccines or something.

So somebody sent me a link to PolitiFact where they fact checked all the wild Bill Gates rumors. Now my version of debunking the wild Bill Gates rumors, mine goes like this and maybe you've heard this argument before. Blah blah blah Bill Gates wants to depopulate the world. Here's my argument. You know all those Nigerian prince emails? That's the end of my argument because it's just such a ridiculous claim. I'm not going to spend one second googling whether Bill Gates ever said he wants to depopulate the world. Do you know why? Because if you ever thought that was true there's something wrong with your brain.

All right this is not something you google to find out. Maybe he said he wants to depopulate the world. He didn't say he wants to depopulate the world and you know I checked PolitiFact and of course that never happened.

What was the other one? The other one was some horrible thing with vaccines in India. And I actually thought that one could have been true. It's just that even if it had been true it just would have been an example of a drug trial that didn't go well. It wouldn't mean anybody was evil or had bad intentions. I know this whole point of the drug trial but it turns out it wasn't even true. So that whole India vaccine thing was just all made up, just BS.

So I tweeted that if you want to go follow the links so you can convince yourself. So if any of you thought that the Bill Gates stuff was true you really should have asked me.

I did some restaurant reopening ideas which I would like to share with you for those of you who didn't see it. So here's the starting point. One of the creative mistakes we make is to say hey let's what could we do to get our restaurants back to where they always were. You fall for hoaxes. Blog not true. So people think hey how do we get our restaurants back the way they were? And I say if the restaurant model is just blown up you should not be asking this question. You should not be asking how to get restaurants back to the way they were because you rarely get a chance to blow everything up and you know just rethinking from scratch.

And so I think you should be asking how could we make restaurants better than they ever were? Because you should at least ask the question. I mean it might turn out that the answer is you can't do it. But if the only question you're asking is how do we get back to the way we were that's sort of a loser mindset. Because when do you get to have stuff blown up like this? I mean it's all bad news but on the other hand you kind of get to start from scratch and really get creative and be flexible. Maybe there's some local ordinances that can be adjusted a little bit that normally wouldn't be possible.

So here are some things I want to suggest in that realm. Suppose Uber or any of the apps that let you order food to be picked up in restaurants, suppose they added an option for dining in. Instead of where you put in your address of your house you put in your table number. So if you're ordering from a certain restaurant you put in the table number. That means you're there and so there's no server talking to you to get your order. You just order by app when you're in the restaurant and then it comes over and it's sat on a side table so that nobody puts it in front of each of you. There's nobody taking dishes away. They just put a side table there and you help yourself so that you're not interacting.

Now of course in the long run, especially a high end restaurant, you want the full table service. But at the moment I'm going to have to get flexible.

I also thought that you could add a little tent card, a little sign that's on the table. There's the phone numbers to text if you want to send a message to the kitchen. It's not the chef who answers the phone but if you want to send a message to the kitchen or the front office or the server or something you just text it and there would be somebody whose job it is just to take the text and tell whoever it is that needs to be told. So that's one way you could avoid human contact.

You might also want to relax local zoning laws so you can expand sidewalks out during warm weather. It just may be close the streets for a while, for months. Just close any streets that have a lot of restaurants on them because usually there's not much parking on the street anyway. You don't lose that much and usually there's an easier way to get around than the street that has all the restaurants. So just close it. Let the restaurants expand into the street so you've got lots of space around tables. And maybe even allow dogs. In my town you can't bring your dog to a restaurant even if you're eating outside. But what if you could? Yeah at least temporarily. When do you like to bring your dog out to dinner? And you have monthly SH of course a lot of people would like that. At least in my town that would be a big thing.

And you can also imagine using the honor system because you could never enforce this. You would ask people to come in and only in the beginning with the people that they're isolating with. So if you're isolated with your family you can bring your family and sit at a table at a restaurant. But you wouldn't mix people who have been separately isolating just because they went to a restaurant. You could do that. And maybe if it's a business meeting and you just have to have people cross pollinating you have some special places away from other people, something like that.

But the larger idea is just to rethink these things from scratch and rather than say how do we get back to where we were think about how to make it better.

All right I promised you that I would give you the user interface for reality and I'm working on a book idea. An awful writer do not but it has to do with filters. And I was trying to think of all the different filters that one can put on life. And I've argued that if you have experience in enough domains you can look through more windows. Or another way to say that is you have more filters by which to understand the world.

And I would contend this is not yet a complete list and I might end up combining some categories a little bit but let's say this is about 90% right. I contend that these are the filters. Then if you learned enough about these, and you wouldn't have to be an expert on any of these things, but if you learned logic and religion, if you, mating let me explain that one as a filter. What that means is to understand, let me get that guy out of here. Bad person goes away. All right that's always satisfying. Did Soros Irish get rid of the crazy people anymore? All right so having gotten rid of our trolls.

So mating is the idea that you can see the world through the lens that everything we do is to show off to get a mate. Even if you have a mate we're just sort of automatically designed for mating. So if you see the world through that lens you can really understand a lot of the world.

You should know a little bit about statistics and science, persuasion, economics, simulation. That's not a word. Let's call it the simulation, the simulation theory that we might be a simulation.

The idea that some people just see the world as winners and losers. Other people might see it as predator and prey. There's also a strategy way to look at the world. There's an abundance mindset. Yeah the abundance mindset is that you're not taking things from other people. You're finding a way that everybody gets something.

And then the moist robot idea which might be redundant. Just the idea that we're dumb machines and irrational.

So my concept is this. That if you knew enough about these fields you would have the user interface to reality and you would be able to actually see your reality and manipulate it almost in a god-like way. I said almost. I'm not saying you're omnipotent but that you could do things which would not seem possible to people who had fewer filters.

So the more filters you have the more clear is, you know if you could see it like an analogy, the more clear the screen is and the more obvious then many of your choices are.

So this probably would require a book to really explain it well but the useful part of this is that you probably don't need more of it. Examples would be a good example. Let's see if I could pick one. Well let's take abundance.

So we have a problem with Communist China because it looks like they think that the best thing for China is for the United States to be weaker. So that's the opposite of an abundance mindset. President Trump has an abundance mindset. He used it with North Korea. He's used it with President Xi. Obviously it's not working in China and who knows what's happening in North Korea but they don't seem to be mad at us at the moment so that's good.

But the president said hey if we work together we both get richer. If we stay enemies we don't. Now obviously it seems that China has some kind of winner loser predator prey mentality that there are only people winning and losing and they want to be on the winning team. Whereas the president of course still has those filters as well but he has extra filters.

So instead of obviously knowing that if he went to China and said hey it's a win or lose situation one of us could win and what does go lose you know good luck we're gonna win you're gonna lose that wouldn't really get you very far in negotiations. But if you go into the negotiations with an abundance mindset you get that you know maybe a price of flexibility on the other side.

All right so let me give you some other examples. I like to use this example all the time. If you understand economics and you understand business models then you probably understand that it's very unlikely you'll get a speeding ticket at 6:00 a.m. on a Sunday morning.

Now that's something that you could see clearly if you have the economics filter. And if it's not obvious to you why you're not going to get a ticket at 6:00 a.m. on a Sunday morning no matter how fast you speed it's because you don't have that filter yet. Maybe I can explain why.

The police department is like every other organization. They have a budget and so they have to use the budget where it makes sense and not where it doesn't make sense otherwise they'll run out of money and not be able to do the things they need. So given that almost nobody has a car accident at 6:00 a.m. on a Sunday morning it's probably the least likely time that speeding is ever an actual safety problem because there's just nobody around. And if they are they're not drunk you know for the most part. 6 a.m. I would say not too many drunks. And so you will notice that economics would predict it would predict that there are very few speed traps at 6:00 a.m. on a Sunday morning. And I would argue that if you live to be a hundred you might never see one.

So that's a very trivial example but I go through life with an understanding of business models and economics that does allow me to see around corners. I can literally predict based on economics whether there's a policeman up ahead in that speed trap or they also often hide. So in my neighborhood there's a place they often stay and I can predict that accurately as it turns out.

All right let's take strategy. A perfect example of that, when I wrote my book "How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big" I introduced the idea of systems versus goals and the idea of talent stacking. You know I've talked about it enough that I don't need to explain it again. But in the context I'm talking about here a lot of people wrote to me, a lot, a lot of people, and said my god when I heard those things it really you know it all came together and then I had a strategy and then I could implement it and it's already working.

So I would hear tremendous things about people learning that strategy and when I would hear it I would say to myself you know when I wrote that the thing I was most worried about is that people would say we already knew that. But I was hoping that people did not have enough sort of background in strategy to know that it makes sense to layer your skills intelligently and it makes sense to have systems versus goals. I didn't know if people didn't know that until I wrote the book because you really don't know what other people know. I thought it would be additive and it turns out it was life-changing for a lot of people.

So that's a perfect example. And the strategy is not worth much unless you have some understanding of statistics. And I don't mean you have to be able to do the math. I mean that you have to in a common sense way be able to look at things and say okay that's more likely than that under these conditions. You wouldn't be able to tell what's true versus the margin of error. I'm talking about the big level stuff.

For example here's a perfect example. The headline this week was that there was a study of Santa Clara residents and they found that I forget the exact number but somewhere in the range of two percent of them seemed to have the antibodies for the coronavirus. And that would indicate maybe there was a lot more of it in the general population. But anybody assumed now Balaji Srinivasan who if you don't follow him on Twitter you should, he has a background that would include all the credible knowledge but most importantly he understood statistics and he understood how to read the document and he looked at it and said wait a minute according to this the reliability of the test is that it could have false positives up to like in that same neighborhood. In that same, I'm rounding everything off to make it simple, but that the false positives could be in that same neighborhood.

So in other words it was a whole study that either showed that nothing happened or that there's wildly more virus and the completely opposite ends are both demonstrated by the same data. Now did you know that when you read the study? Did you know that? I mean I didn't even look at the details and I'm not sure I would have picked it out if I had. But the point is the more you know about statistics the more you can just look right past people's assertions to the truth. Now the logic could do that. I couldn't.

Now that doesn't mean that the study is bogus. It just means that you can't be sure which is completely different than we're sure that there's tons of virus in the world that we don't know about. There's a big difference between well it could be true and oh it's totally true we just studied that. Those are not that similar.

All right. Do you want some other examples? Here's some other examples. I said winners and losers on here but you could say victims and oppressors I suppose. Victims and oppressors. So if you see the world in terms of victims there's a good chance you're going to think you are one. And when you start thinking you are one your filter just starts producing evidence of it, confirmation bias. And that can be a very frustrating and also maybe not too close to reality view of the world. So that's a bad filter.

A better filter is that you're not a victim and that you have a lot of control over your life. So that's just a better filter anyway.

I don't want to talk about the details of these. I'm just asserting that there might be, how many things aren't there here? So there might be under 15 filters that can explain just about everything you see in life.

And I've said before that when I was very young I sought to understand the user interface for reality and I actually have dedicated my life literally to try to figure out why things are the way they are and why it works and what can you do differently. And this is sort of the result of it. That I started layering different skills together especially a degree in economics so I can understand that filter.

All right I was asked to give you some sleeping tips for tonight and I'm going to do that and I'm going to do it more easily this time. So those of you who don't want to get sleepy yet you might want to sign off now and I wish you a good night. Maybe I'll see you in the morning. I hope so.

Those of you who would like to relax before sleep and see if they can get an even better night's sleep than they have recently, this will be the portion in which I calm you down and prep you for a great night's sleep.

It goes like this. Take a deep breath from the bottom of your lungs, not the top part of your lungs. Then exhale out your nose. Well actually out of your mouth would be fine. Inhale through your nose and exhale through your mouth. And it's funny you don't realize that during the day your tension will make your breath shallower and shallower. And if you simply breathe in the way you want to feel, your breath will take you there. So if you take large relaxed deep breaths with no tension into your chest it just automatically takes you to that place. It does it pretty quickly.

Now make sure that you're in a relaxed place that requires no muscles to stay in the position you are. You can be sitting up. You can keep your legs down. It doesn't matter.

And now again think of the muscles in your hand. Your hand should be down not up like mine is. But squeeze your hand and make a tight fist and just hold it until you don't think you can hold it anymore. And when you don't think you can hold it anymore just relax it. Just let it all go. Notice how it feels. All the tension is out of your hand.

And do the same thing with your other hand and then to your feet. You can just run through the sequence on your own time and you will be amazed that just concentrating on one body part, squeezing it, tightening it and relaxing it, moving it all the way around your body will be amazing. You'll be amazed at how well that works.

Now here's the big payoff. I taught you before and many of you were on this Periscope that if I counted to 20, because I'm a trained hypnotist and if anybody didn't know that here's your warning that this is hypnosis but there's nothing sneaky to it. I'm just helping you relax. If you'd like to enjoy that stick around. If you would not like to be hypnotized, while I would not call this hypnosis per se, it would make you relaxed. If you don't want that this would be the time to find something else to do.

But I'm going to count to 20 and you're going to hear my voice, if you're wearing headphones much more effective. And when you want to relax later tonight you're going to hear my voice but you'll be controlling the counting. You'll count from zero to 20. When you reach 20 you'll be really relaxed and it'll be prepping you to drift off into a nice sleep.

And I'm going to start right now. And every time I count higher one you start getting sleepier and more relaxed. Two and going deeper. Three and now going deeper and deeper. Four, five and now much deeper, twice as deep now. Six, seven, eight and going deeper. Doesn't matter if I skip a number. Ten. I could skip two numbers. Twelve and you would just get deeper and deeper and more relaxed.

And now as I head toward 20, toward the deepest and most relaxing state you've experienced in a long time. Fifteen, sixteen and going deeper. Seventeen and now so relaxed feeling good. Eighteen. And now I'm going to count backwards as part of an exercise in which when you wake up a little bit but not all the way and then I count you back to 20 you'll be deeper than if I just go straight to 20 in the first place.

So now fourteen, thirteen, twelve. You feel yourself getting a little more awake, a little more alert. Nine, eight, seven. You're about half more alert now. Six, five. And now we'll go back to twenty. Feel yourself relaxing. See how much quicker it is than the first time you tried this. Eight going deeper. Nine you feel your body just sinking into whatever you're on. Ten, eleven going much deeper now. Now twice as deep. Fourteen going deeper. Fifteen, sixteen much much deeper now. Seventeen, eighteen and going deeper. Nineteen, twenty. And now completely relaxed almost floating. It feels good.

Now twenty one, twenty two deeper than you thought was possible. And this is why you'll remember when you try to relax later tonight. You'll remember the counting. You'll remember how you felt and you'll be able to reproduce it just by remembering it and counting yourself to twenty.

But now I'm going to bring you back so that you can get ready for your evening and whatever is next. Nineteen, eighteen, seventeen. Starting to wake up. Sixteen, fifteen, fourteen. About halfway there. Ten, eight, seven. Almost awake now. Six, five. You're going to feel really good when you wake up. Four. Oh my goodness it's going to feel great when you wake up. Three, two, one. Open your eyes if they're not already open. You're completely alert but more relaxed. And later when you talk yourself back to twenty you're going to have an amazing sleep.

Then I'll leave you with that. Have a great night.

hey everybody come on in we got some stuff to talk about good stuff fun - fun stuff things that will blow your mind possibly delight you possibly blow your mind and then delight you it's all happening here oh I don't know if it's morning or evening I'm gonna put down my shades so let's see if I look more handsome when there's less light on me because I think I do if you know what I mean all right let's get to it yeah let's get to it Cristina nice of you to join so I was watching the interview with Bill Maher did with Dan Crenshaw you don't do Crenshaw and if you know who Dan Crenshaw is you know that he's one of the probably one of the better communicators on the on the right probably one in the top probably the top five or so you put it in there with Matt gates and I don't a few other people darker police so less light much less light would be much better anyway so if you watch the interview is going around the internet and you people were saying that Crenshaw dismantled Bill Maher and everything but here's what I saw now of course I can't read minds but here's a some speculation and you can decide how close this sounds to you does this seem reasonable to you that Bill Maher probably hears a lot of arguments that agree with the left probably hears him all the time but I'll bet he doesn't hear many good arguments from the right he probably he probably hears the the one pundit to CNN allow us to be on their air every you know ten minutes or every you know ten days or something and you know he probably samples a little bit of the stuff that clips and League quotes taken out of context and stuff but I'll bet about Bill Maher and this is just speculation through no fault of his own it probably has a gigantic blind spot for what the good argument is on the right I've noticed this a few times it doesn't ever seem as though Bill Maher is disagreeing with the best arguments on the right but of course he's disagreeing with the dumb ones that don't make any sense and what the reason I'm somewhat more fascinated with Bill Maher is I've been watching it for years and I know that he is capable of changing his mind under any circumstances so long as there's a good argument you know and there's some data so if you've watched him forever you know that he's you know four people on both the left and the right he can be maddeningly frustrating because he doesn't just automatically agree with one team and so people you know everybody finds some reason to be mad at one thing another so here's what I saw and I think that Bill Maher got a little flavor of this one I was on his show back in 2016 I guess and it goes like this I think that when Dan Crenshaw started talking it looked like you could see in bill's face that he was learning for the first time that there's another curtain behind the curtain in other words you know somebody as you tuned in as Bill Maher can not only see the show that everybody sees you know the one that's in public but he's he's one of the few people can look behind the curtain and I think he thought that if he could see the show and that he could also look behind the curtain that's all there is to say and I feel as if what I was watching and again this requires a lot of speculation and assumption of my part but it felt like what I was seeing was that Bill Maher was learning from dan Crenshaw's better communicating that there was a curtain behind the curtain that there might be a whole bunch of stuff who knows how big might be a little might be a lot but it was like it was like bill was for the first time hearing something that made sense that was coming from the other team and I think it made him think is there something here now if had been anybody else they would just be dismissing it because it's just team sport but what makes somebody like a Bill Maher and I would say Sam Harris would be in the same category even if you don't agree I think he is people who can't change their mind they just have to you're a better argued see facts to support it so that was fascinating a lot of people asked me for last few weeks to talk about dr.

Shiva's ideas of treating coronavirus and I hadn't really looked into them until today so I had so I have a preliminary opinion a preliminary opinion my preliminary opinion is that in essence what he's promoting or not promoting you know it doesn't have any money as in it as far as I know but what he's recommending is that some kind of a intensive vitamin treatment with specific vitamins I think a and T and C would make a big difference in the coronavirus you're treating him now here's the thing I have to give you some background some of you know years ago I tried to start a food company making this burrito product that I tried to stuff with all the vitamins and minerals you would need for the whole day I thought would that be great you can either delicious burrito and make sure you've got all your vitamins and minerals so even if the rest of the day didn't go well you'd be set and in that process what I learned is that the science of nutrition is is largely made up it's just all just garbage and the the science of vitamins and minerals is extra garbage so part of the reason that I ended up bailing out is that I couldn't I couldn't make a product with a claim that hey it's got these vitamins and minerals if all the science was evaporating behind me you know when I started it I thought the science was pretty solid but there was honestly just an assumption I just assumed we knew the vitamins are good for you right did you assume that science knows if vitamins are good for you and which ones and how much there's no such thing the the science of vitamins is largely just ridiculousness now I'm not saying that vitamins have no no value obviously you need your vitamin C's you don't give scurvy vitamin D probably does have all kinds of benefits etc so some of the basics we certainly know but beyond the basics it's just the Wild West so I may be biased by the fact that I I spend time in this domain of vitamins and what I found is that it was all charlatans and garbage that was my experience now does that mean that the next thing that comes up is untrue because all the last stuff was it doesn't it doesn't mean that at all so I'm so I'm confessing my bias so here this part really clearly my bias is that what I hear a remarkable sounding claim involving ordinary vitamins even that high dosages or even if they're intravenous but if I hear something that's an extraordinary claim about vitamins I just assume it's not true okay so that's my starting point let me give you a analogy to make my point if you get an email from a Nigerian prince who says he can get his money back from a bank if you help him out do you need to know if that's real do you need to research it do you need to ask for identification no you don't because it's an email from a Nigerian print that whole category is very unlikely ever to produce a real one might that might i mean i can't say there will never ever be a nigerian prince who's in really got some trouble and you could help him if you just return his email I'm not saying it's impossible I'm just saying I've never seen it so if so if somebody tomorrow says hey hey I know these have mostly been not true but the have you seen this email it's from a Nigerian prince and I know I know I know you why are you saying that all those other words were not real but I feel good about this one so analogies of course are imperfect and therefore it's one of the reasons that they never persuade anybody and I'm sure I didn't persuade you with that one the point is I'm that I'm biased the point is not that you should believe is real or not real based on that story the point is I'm biased and so when I see a remarkable claim that has this form it's very remarkable and suspiciously the medical community is ignoring this claim and or is unfamiliar with it so if it's a remarkable claim about vitamins and the other claim is that the medical community is missing this obvious thing it's sort of in the category of things that are never true but again this could be the one time maybe it is so I tweeted it out dr.

Shiva had some exchanges with something I tweeted it out because it had links and description of why he was talking about and asked any experts to give me an opinion whether it looked real now if some experts commend and say Scott Scott Scott he's on to something well I'm open to changing my mind I could definitely change my mind I would just have to hear somebody smart say oh yeah yeah I get it all the other Nigerian Prince's were fake but honestly this one looks pretty good if somebody says that I'll reconsider but so the question is out so now I saw in the comments somebody says you should debate dr.

Shiva are you kidding are you kidding what good would that do me debating dr.

Shiva let me let me do the debate for you so that you don't have to sit through it I will now act out Mead debating dr.

Shiva on this topic this first I'll do the role of dr.

Shiva blahblah something I don't understand meaning Scott doesn't understand and vitamins and and stuff and science and I have multiple degrees from MIT and then it's my turn to debate and I say I know I didn't understand any of that honestly babe I know where do we go from here because I don't even know what those words mean do you have a book or something I could read to learn about this microbiology stuff and you know immunology and viral adji and statistics i if i'd do a little studying i'll get a little studying and then we can have this debate again but at the moment i don't know any of those words mean so we're not getting anywhere you see there would be no point in debate right because I would say it's my bias that these things are usually not true and then what would he say well I can see why you would have that bias based on your experience right that's that's sort of the beginning and the end of the debate because I think dr.

Shiva would say well of course you've just admitted that you have a bias I can this I can see the reason you would have a bias your experience of course you have a bias that way that's it that's that's the old debate we're done now because I don't understand his points that's why I asked for somebody else to explain it to me all right I think what triggered me is that in dr.

Shiva's tweet he made an assumption about Bill Gates's motives Bill Gates internal thoughts and if you pair something that looks sketchy just by its nature even if it's not it just looks sketchy because of its nature and you add that too conspicuous public mind-reading well that does not help your credibility because it seemed like that was important that it would require knowing what Bill Gates was thinking and that what he was thinking was he was trying to make money with vaccines or something so somebody sent me a link to Politi.

Fact where they fact checked all the wild Bill Gates rumors now my version of debunking the wild Bill Gates rumors mine goes like this and maybe you've heard this argument before blah blah blah Bill Gates wants to depopulate the world here's my argument you know all those Nigerian prince emails that's the end of my argument because it's just such such a ridiculous claim I'm not going to spend one second googling whether Bill Gates ever said he wants to depopulate the world do you know why because if you ever thought that was true there's something wrong with your brain all right this is not something you google to find out maybe he said he wants to depopulate the world he didn't say he wants to depopulate the world and you know I checked politifact and of course that never happened what was the other one the other one was some horrible thing with vaccines in India and I actually thought that one could have been true it's just that even if had been true it just would have been an example of a drug trial that didn't go well it wouldn't mean anybody was evil or had bad intentions I know this whole point of the drug trial but it turns out it wasn't even true so so that whole India vaccine thing was just all made up just BS so I tweeted that if you want to go follow the links so you can convince yourself so if any of you thought that the Bill Gates stuff was true you really should have asked me I did some restaurant reopening ideas which I would like to share with you for those of you didn't see it so here's the starting point you know one of the one of the creative mistakes we make is to say hey let's what could we do to get our restaurants back to where you always fall for hoaxes blog not true sue so people think hey how do we get our restaurants back the way they were and I say if the restaurant model is just blown up you should not be asking this question you should you should not be asking how to get restaurants back to the way they were because you rarely get a chance to blow everything up and you know just rethinking from the scratch and so I think you should be asking how could we make restaurants better than they ever were because you should at least ask the question I mean it might turn out that the answer is you can't do it but if the only question you're asking is how do we get back to way the way we were that's sort of a loser mindset because when do you get to have stuff blown up like this I mean it's all bad news bought on the other hand you kind of get to start from scratch and really get creative and be flexible maybe there's some local ordinances that can be you know adjusted a little bit that normally wouldn't be possible so here are some things I want to suggest in that realm supposed or - or any of the apps that let you order food to be picked up in restaurants suppose I added an option for dining in instead of where you put in your address of your house you put in your table number so if you're ordering from a certain restaurant you put it in the table number that means you're there and so there's no server talking to you to get your order you just order by app when you're in the restaurant and then it comes over and it's sat on a side table so that nobody nobody puts it in front of each of you there's nobody taking dishes away they just put a side table there and you help yourself so that you're not interacting now of course in the long run it's especially a high-end restaurant you want the full table service but at the moment I'm gonna have to get flexible I also thought that you could add a little tent card a little you know a sign that's on the table there's the phone numbers to text if you want to send a message to the to the kitchen it's not the chef who answers the phone but if you want to send a message to the kitchen or the front office or the server or something you just text it and there would be somebody whose job it is just to take the text and tell whoever it is that needs to be told so that's one way you could avoid human contact you might also want to relax local zoning laws so you can expand sidewalks out during warm weather it just may be closed the streets you know for a while for months just close any streets that have a lot of restaurants on them because usually there's not much parking on the street anyway you don't lose that much and usually there's an easier way to get around then the street that has all the restaurants so just close it let the restaurants expand into the street so you got lots of space around tables and maybe even allow dogs in my town you can't bring your dog to a restaurant even if you're eating outside but what if you could yeah at least temporarily when do you like to bring your dog out to dinner and you have monthly SH of course a lot of people would like that at least in my town that would be a big thing and you can also imagine that using the honor system because you could never enforce this you would ask people to come in and only in the at least in the beginning with the people that they're isolating with so if you're isolated with your family you can bring your family and send at a table at a restaurant but you know what a mix people who have been separately isolating just because they went to a restaurant you could do that and maybe maybe if it's a business meeting and you just have to have people cross pollinating you have some special places you know away from other people something like that but the larger idea is just to rethink these things from scratch and rather than say how do we get back to where we were think about how to make it better all right I promised you that I would give you the user interface for reality and I'm working on a book idea an awful writer do not but has to do with filters and I was trying to think of all the different filters that one can put on life and I've argued that if you have an experience in enough domains you can look through more windows or another way to say that is you bore it you have more filters by which to understand the world and I would contend this is not yet a complete list and I might end up combining some categories a little bit but let's say this is about 90% right I contend that these are the filters then if you learned enough about these and you wouldn't have to be an expert on any of these things but if you learned you know logic and religion if you mating let me explain that one as a filter what that means is to understand let me get that guy out of here bad person goes away all right that's always satisfied did Soros Irish get rid of the crazy people anymore all right so having gotten rid of our trolls so mating is the idea that you can see the world through the lens that everything we do is to show off to get a mate even if you have a mate we're just sort of automatically designed for mating so if you see the world through that lens you can really understand a lot of a lot of the world you should know a little bit about statistics and science persuasion economics simu tation that's not a word let's call it the simulation the simulation theory that we might be a simulation the the idea that some people just see the world as winners and losers other people might see it as predator and prey there's also a strategy way to look at the world there's an abundance mindset yeah the abundance mindset is that you're not taking things from other people you're finding a way that everybody gets something and then the moist robot idea which might be redundant just the idea that were were dumb machines and irrational so my my concept is this that if you knew enough about these fields you would have the user interface to reality and you would be able to actually see your reality and manipulate it almost in a god-like way I said almost I'm not saying you're omnipotent but that you could do things which would not seem possible to people who had fewer filters so the more filters you have the more clear is you know if you could see it like an analogy you more clear the screen is and more obvious than many of your choices are so this probably would require a book to really explain it well but the the useful part of this is that you probably don't need more of it examples yeah we'll be a good example let's see if I could pick one well all let's take abundance so we have a problem with their Communist China because it looks like they think that the best thing for China is for the United States to be weaker so that's the opposite of an abundance mindset president trungpa has an abundance mindset he used it with North Korea he's used it with President Xi obviously is not working in China and who knows what's happening in North Korea but they don't seem to be mad at us at the moment so that's good but the president said hey if we work together we both get richer if we stay enemies we don't now obviously it seems that China has some kind of winner loser predator-prey mentality that there are only people winning and losing and they want to be on the winning team whereas the president of course still has those filters as well but he has extra filters so he instead of you know obviously knowing that if he went to China and said hey it's a it's a win or lose situation one of us could win and what does go lose you know good luck we're gonna win you're gonna lose that wouldn't really get you very far in negotiations but if you go into it if you go into the negotiations with an abundance mindset you get that you know baby price of flexibility on the other side all right so let me give you some other examples I like to use this example all the time if you understand economics and you understand business models then you probably understand that it's very unlikely you'll get a speeding ticket as 6:00 a.m.

on a Sunday morning now that's something that you could see clearly if you have the economics filter and if it's not obvious to you why you're not going to get a ticket as 6:00 a.m.

on the subject morning no matter how fast you speed it's because you don't have that filter yet maybe explain why the police department is like every other organization they have a budget and so they have to use the budget where it makes sense and not where it doesn't make sense otherwise they'll run out of money and not be able to do the things they need so given that almost nobody has a car accident and 6:00 a.m.

on a Sunday morning it's probably the least likely time this speeding is ever an actual safety problem because there's just nobody around and if they are they're not drunk you know for the most part 6 a.m.

I would say not too many drugs and so you will notice that economics would predict it would predict that there are very few speed traps at 6:00 a.m.

on a Sunday morning and I would argue that if you live to be a hundred you might never see one so that's a very trivial example but I go through life with an understanding of business models and economics that does allow me to see to see around corners I can literally predict based on economics whether there's a a policeman up ahead in that a speed trap order they also often hide so in my house in my neighborhood there's a place they often stay and I can predict that accurately as it turns out all right let's take strategy a perfect example of that when I wrote my book had a failed almost everything and still win big I introduced the idea of systems versus goals and the idea of talent stacking you know I've talked about him enough that I don't need to explain him again but in the context I'm talking about here a lot of people wrote to me a lot a lot of people and said my god when I heard those things it really you know it all came together and then I had a strategy and then I could implement it and it's already working so I would hear tremendous things about people learning that strategy and when I would hear it I would say to myself you know when I wrote that the thing I was most worried about is that people would say we already knew that but I was hoping that people did not have enough sort of background in strategy to know that it makes sense to layer your skills intelligently and it makes sense to have systems versus goals I didn't know if people didn't know that until I wrote the book because you don't really don't know what other people know I thought it would be additive and it turns out it was life-changing for a lot of people so that's a perfect example and the the strategy is not worth much unless you have some understanding of statistics and I don't I don't mean you have to be able to do the math I mean that you have to in a common-sense way be able to look at things and say okay that's more likely than that under these conditions you wouldn't be able to tell what's true versus the margin of error I'm talking about the big you know the big big level stuff for example here's a perfect example the headline this week was that there was a study of Santa Clara residents and they found that I forget the exact number but somewhere in the range of two percent of them seemed to have the antibodies for AK rotavirus but and that would indicate maybe was a lot more of it in the general population but anybody assumed now Balaji Srinivasan who if you don't follow him on Twitter you should he has a background that would include you know all the credible knowledge but most importantly he understood statistics and he understood how to read the the document and he looked at and said wait a minute according to this the the the reliability of the test is that it could have false positives up to like in that same neighborhood in that same I'm rounding everything off to make it simple but that the false positives could be in that same neighborhood so in other words it was a whole study that either showed that nothing that nothing happened or that there's wildly more virus and the completely complete opposites and they're both demonstrated by the same data now did you know that when you read this study did you know that I mean I didn't even look at the details and I'm not sure I would have picked it out if I had but the point is the more you do about statistics the more you can just look look right past people's assertions to the truth now the logic could do that I couldn't now that doesn't mean that the study is bogus it just means that you can't be sure which is completely different than we're sure that there's tons of virus in the world that we don't know about it there's a big difference between well it could be true and oh it's totally true we just study that those are there's not that similar alright see do you want some other oh here's some other examples the I said winners and losers on here but you could send victims some victims and winners I suppose victims and oppressors so if you see the world in terms of victims there's a good chance you're gonna think you are one and when you start thinking you are one your filter just starts producing evidence of it confirmation bias and that can be a very frustrating and also maybe not too close to reality view of the world so that's a that's a bad filter a better filter is that you're not a victim and that you have a lot of control over your life so that's just a better filter anyway I don't want to talk about the details of these I'm just asserting that there might be how many things aren't there here so there might be under 15 filters that can explain just about everything you see in life and I and I've said before that when I when I was very young I sought to understand the user interface for a reality and I actually have dedicated my life literally to try to figure out why things are the way they are and why it works and what can you do differently and this is this is sort of the result of it that I started layering different skills together especially a degree in economics so I can understand that filter all right I was asked to give you some sleeping tips for tonight and I'm gonna do that and I'm gonna do it more easily this time so those of you who don't want to get sleepy yet you might want to sign off now and I wish wish you a good night maybe I'll see you in the morning I hope so those of you who would like to relax before sleep and see if they can get an even better night's sleep than they have recently recently this will be the portion in which I calm you down and prep you for a great night's sleep it goes like this take a deep breath from the bottom of your your lungs not the top a lot of your lungs then exhale out your nose well actually actually out of your mouth would be fine inhale through your nose and exhale through your mouth and it's funny you don't realize that during the day your tension will make your breath that shallower and shallower and if you simply breathe and the way you want to feel your breath will take you there so if you take large relaxed deep breaths with no no tension into your chest it just automatically takes you to that place it does it pretty quickly now make sure that you're in a relaxed place that requires no muscles to stay in the position you are you can be sitting up you keep your leg down it doesn't matter and now again think of the muscles in your hand your hand should be down not up like mine is but squeeze your hand and make our tight fist and just hold it until you don't think you can hold it anymore and when you don't think you can hold it anymore just relax it just let it all go I just know how it feels all the tension is out of your hand and out do the same thing with your other hand and then to your feet you can just run through the run through the sequence on your own time and you will be amazed that just concentrating on one body part squeezing it tightening it and relaxing it moving it all the way around your body will be amazing you'll be amazed at how well that works now here's the big payoff I taught you before and many of you were on this periscope that if I counted it to 20 because I'm a trained hypnotist and if anybody didn't know that here's your warning that this is hypnosis but there's nothing sneaky to it I'm just helping you relax if you'd like to enjoy that stick around if you would not like to be hypnotized that while I would not call this hypnosis per se yeah there's no actual transit halt it would make you relaxed if you don't want that this would be the time to find something else to do but I'm going to count to 20 and you're going to hear my voice if you're wearing headphones much more effective and when you want to relax later tonight you're going to hear my voice but you'll be controlling the counting of my voice you'll count from zero to 20 when you reach 20 you'll be really relaxed and it'll be prepping you to drift off into a nice sleep and I'm going to start right now and every time I count higher one you start getting sleepier and more relaxed - and going deeper three and now going deeper and deeper for five and now much deeper twice as deep now six seven eight and going deeper doesn't matter if I skip a number ten I could skip to numbers 12 and you would just get deeper and deeper and more relaxed and now as I head toward 20 toward the deepest and most relaxing sleep you've experienced in a long time 15 16 and going deeper 17 and I was so relaxed feeling good 18 and now I'm going to count backwards as part of an exercise in which when you wake up a little bit but not all the way and then I count you back to or 20 you'll be deeper than if you I just go into 20 in the first place so now 14 13 12 you feel yourself getting a little bored awake a little more alert 9 8 7 you're about 1/2 more alert now 6 5 and now we'll go back to 27 feel yourself relaxing see how much quicker it is than the first times you tried this 8 going deeper 9 you feel your body just sinking into the into whatever you're on 10 11 going much deeper now now twice as deep 14 going deeper 15 16 much much deeper now 17 18 and going deeper 19 20 and now completely relaxed almost floating it feels good now 21 22 deeper than you thought was possible and this is why you'll remember when you try to relax later you'll remember the counting you remember how you felt and you'll be able to reproduce it just by remembering it and counting yourself to 20 but now I'm going to bring you back so that you can get ready for your evening and whatever is whatever's next 19 18 17 started to wake up 16 15 14 about halfway there 10 8 7 almost awake no 6 5 you're gonna feel really good when you wake up 4 oh my goodness it's gonna feel great when you wake up 3 2 1 open your eyes if they're not already open you're completely alert but more relaxed and later when you you talk to yourself back to 20 you're gonna have an amazing sleep then I'll leave you with that have a great night

hey everybody come on in we got some

stuff to talk about

good stuff fun - fun stuff things that

will blow your mind possibly delight you

possibly blow your mind and then delight

you

it's all happening here oh I don't know

if it's morning or evening I'm gonna put

down my shades so let's see if I look

more handsome when there's less light on

me because I think I do if you know what

I mean all right let's get to it

yeah let's get to it Cristina nice of

you to join so I was watching the

interview with Bill Maher did with Dan

Crenshaw you don't do Crenshaw and if

you know who Dan Crenshaw is you know

that he's one of the probably one of the

better communicators on the on the right

probably one in the top probably the top

five or so you put it in there with Matt

gates and I don't a few other people

darker police

so less light much less light would be

much better anyway so if you watch the

interview is going around the internet

and you people were saying that Crenshaw

dismantled Bill Maher and everything but

here's what I saw now of course I can't

read minds but here's a some speculation

and you can decide how close this sounds

to you does this seem reasonable to you

that Bill Maher probably hears a lot of

arguments that agree with the left

probably hears him all the time but I'll

bet he doesn't hear many good arguments

from the right he probably he probably

hears the the one pundit to CNN allow us

to be on their air every you know ten

minutes or every you know ten days or

something

and you know he probably samples a

little bit of the stuff that clips and

League quotes taken out of context and

stuff but I'll bet about Bill Maher and

this is just speculation through no

fault of his own it probably has a

gigantic blind spot for what the good

argument is on the right I've noticed

this a few times it doesn't ever seem as

though Bill Maher is disagreeing with

the best arguments on the right but of

course he's disagreeing with the dumb

ones that don't make any sense and what

the reason I'm somewhat more fascinated

with Bill Maher is I've been watching it

for years and I know that he is capable

of changing his mind under any

circumstances so long as there's a good

argument you know and there's some data

so if you've watched him forever you

know that he's you know four people on

both the left and the right he can be

maddeningly frustrating because he

doesn't just automatically agree with

one team and so people you know

everybody finds some reason to be mad at

one thing another so here's what I saw

and I think that Bill Maher got a little

flavor of this one I was on his show

back in 2016 I guess and it goes like

this I think that when Dan Crenshaw

started talking it looked like you could

see in bill's face that he was learning

for the first time that there's another

curtain behind the curtain in other

words you know somebody as you tuned in

as Bill Maher can not only see the show

that everybody sees you know the one

that's in public but he's he's one of

the few people can look behind the

curtain and I think he thought that if

he could see the show and that he could

also look behind the curtain that's all

there is to say and I feel as if what I

was watching and again this requires a

lot of speculation and assumption of my

part but it felt like what I was seeing

was that Bill Maher was learning from

dan Crenshaw's better communicating

that there was a curtain behind the

curtain that there might be a whole

bunch of stuff who knows how big might

be a little might be a lot but it was

like it was like bill was for the first

time hearing something that made sense

that was coming from the other team and

I think it made him think is there

something here

now if had been anybody else they would

just be dismissing it because it's just

team sport but what makes somebody like

a Bill Maher and I would say Sam Harris

would be in the same category even if

you don't agree I think he is people who

can't change their mind they just have

to you're a better argued see facts to

support it so that was fascinating a lot

of people asked me for last few weeks to

talk about dr. Shiva's ideas of treating

coronavirus and I hadn't really looked

into them until today so I had so I have

a preliminary opinion a preliminary

opinion my preliminary opinion is that

in essence what he's promoting or not

promoting you know it doesn't have any

money as in it as far as I know but what

he's recommending is that some kind of a

intensive vitamin treatment with

specific vitamins I think a and T and C

would make a big difference in the

coronavirus you're treating him now

here's the thing I have to give you some

background some of you know years ago I

tried to start a food company making

this burrito product that I tried to

stuff with all the vitamins and minerals

you would need for the whole day I

thought would that be great

you can either delicious burrito and

make sure you've got all your vitamins

and minerals so even if the rest of the

day didn't go well you'd be set and in

that process what I learned is that the

science of nutrition is is largely made

up it's just all just garbage

and the the science of vitamins and

minerals is extra garbage so part of the

reason that I ended up bailing out is

that

I couldn't I couldn't make a product

with a claim that hey it's got these

vitamins and minerals if all the science

was evaporating behind me you know when

I started it I thought the science was

pretty solid but there was honestly just

an assumption I just assumed we knew the

vitamins are good for you right did you

assume that science knows if vitamins

are good for you

and which ones and how much there's no

such thing the the science of vitamins

is largely just ridiculousness now I'm

not saying that vitamins have no no

value obviously you need your vitamin

C's you don't give scurvy vitamin D

probably does have all kinds of benefits

etc so some of the basics we certainly

know but beyond the basics it's just the

Wild West so I may be biased by the fact

that I I spend time in this domain of

vitamins and what I found is that it was

all charlatans and garbage that was my

experience now does that mean that the

next thing that comes up is untrue

because all the last stuff was it

doesn't it doesn't mean that at all so

I'm so I'm confessing my bias so here

this part really clearly my bias is that

what I hear a remarkable sounding claim

involving ordinary vitamins even that

high dosages or even if they're

intravenous but if I hear something

that's an extraordinary claim about

vitamins I just assume it's not true

okay so that's my starting point let me

give you a analogy to make my point if

you get an email from a Nigerian prince

who says he can get his money back from

a bank if you help him out do you need

to know if that's real do you need to

research it do you need to ask for

identification no you don't because it's

an email from a Nigerian print

that whole category is very unlikely

ever to produce a real one might that

might i mean i can't say there will

never ever be a nigerian prince who's in

really got some trouble and you could

help him if you just return his email

I'm not saying it's impossible I'm just

saying I've never seen it so if so if

somebody tomorrow says hey hey I know

these have mostly been not true but the

have you seen this email it's from a

Nigerian prince and I know I know I know

you why are you saying that all those

other words were not real but I feel

good about this one so analogies of

course are imperfect and therefore it's

one of the reasons that they never

persuade anybody and I'm sure I didn't

persuade you with that one the point is

I'm that I'm biased the point is not

that you should believe is real or not

real based on that story

the point is I'm biased and so when I

see a remarkable claim that has this

form it's very remarkable and

suspiciously the medical community is

ignoring this claim and or is unfamiliar

with it

so if it's a remarkable claim about

vitamins and the other claim is that the

medical community is missing this

obvious thing it's sort of in the

category of things that are never true

but again this could be the one time

maybe it is so I tweeted it out dr.

Shiva had some exchanges with something

I tweeted it out because it had links

and description of why he was talking

about and asked any experts to give me

an opinion whether it looked real now if

some experts commend and say Scott Scott

Scott he's on to something

well I'm open to changing my mind

I could definitely change my mind I

would just have to hear somebody smart

say oh yeah yeah I get it

all the other Nigerian Prince's were

fake but honestly this one looks pretty

good if somebody says that I'll

reconsider but so the question is out so

now I saw in the comments somebody says

you should debate dr. Shiva

are you kidding are you kidding what

good would that do me debating dr. Shiva

let me let me do the debate for you so

that you don't have to sit through it

I will now act out Mead debating dr.

Shiva on this topic this first I'll do

the role of dr. Shiva blahblah something

I don't understand

meaning Scott doesn't understand and

vitamins and and stuff and science and I

have multiple degrees from MIT and then

it's my turn to debate and I say I know

I didn't understand any of that honestly

babe I know where do we go from here

because I don't even know what those

words mean do you have a book or

something I could read to learn about

this microbiology stuff and you know

immunology and viral adji and statistics

i if i'd do a little studying i'll get a

little studying and then we can have

this debate again but at the moment i

don't know any of those words mean so

we're not getting anywhere you see there

would be no point in debate right

because I would say it's my bias that

these things are usually not true and

then what would he say

well I can see why you would have that

bias based on your experience right

that's that's sort of the beginning and

the end of the debate because I think

dr. Shiva would say well of course

you've just admitted that you have a

bias I can this I can see the reason you

would have a bias your experience of

course you have a bias that way that's

it that's that's the old debate we're

done now because I don't understand his

points that's why I asked for somebody

else to explain it to me all right

I think what triggered me is that in dr.

Shiva's tweet he made an assumption

about Bill Gates's motives

Bill Gates internal thoughts and if you

pair something that looks sketchy just

by its nature even if it's not it just

looks sketchy because of its nature and

you add that too conspicuous public

mind-reading well that does not help

your credibility because it seemed like

that was important that it would require

knowing what Bill Gates was thinking and

that what he was thinking was he was

trying to make money with vaccines or

something

so somebody sent me a link to PolitiFact

where they fact checked all the wild

Bill Gates rumors now my version of

debunking the wild Bill Gates rumors

mine goes like this and maybe you've

heard this argument before blah blah

blah Bill Gates wants to depopulate the

world here's my argument you know all

those Nigerian prince emails that's the

end of my argument because it's just

such such a ridiculous claim I'm not

going to spend one second googling

whether Bill Gates ever said he wants to

depopulate the world do you know why

because if you ever thought that was

true there's something wrong with your

brain all right this is not something

you google to find out maybe he said he

wants to depopulate the world

he didn't say he wants to depopulate the

world and you know I checked politifact

and of course that never happened what

was the other one the other one was some

horrible thing with vaccines in India

and I actually thought that one could

have been true it's just that even if

had been true it just would have been an

example of a drug trial that didn't go

well it wouldn't mean anybody was evil

or had bad intentions I know this whole

point of the drug trial but it turns out

it wasn't even true so so that whole

India vaccine thing was just all made up

just BS so

I tweeted that if you want to go follow

the links so you can convince yourself

so if any of you thought that the Bill

Gates stuff was true you really should

have asked me

I did some restaurant reopening ideas

which I would like to share with you for

those of you didn't see it so here's the

starting point you know one of the one

of the creative mistakes we make is to

say hey let's what could we do to get

our restaurants back to where you always

fall for hoaxes blog not true sue so

people think hey how do we get our

restaurants back the way they were and I

say if the restaurant model is just

blown up you should not be asking this

question you should you should not be

asking how to get restaurants back to

the way they were because you rarely get

a chance to blow everything up and you

know just rethinking from the scratch

and so I think you should be asking how

could we make restaurants better than

they ever were because you should at

least ask the question I mean it might

turn out that the answer is you can't do

it but if the only question you're

asking is how do we get back to way the

way we were that's sort of a loser

mindset because when do you get to have

stuff blown up like this I mean it's all

bad news

bought on the other hand you kind of get

to start from scratch and really get

creative and be flexible maybe there's

some local ordinances that can be you

know adjusted a little bit that normally

wouldn't be possible so here are some

things I want to suggest in that realm

supposed or - or any of the apps that

let you order food to be picked up in

restaurants suppose I added an option

for dining in instead of where you put

in your address of your house you put in

your table number so if you're ordering

from a certain restaurant you put it in

the table number that means you're there

and so there's no server talking to you

to get your order

you just order by app when you're in the

restaurant and then it comes over and

it's sat on a side table so that nobody

nobody puts it in front of each of you

there's nobody taking dishes away they

just put a side table there and you help

yourself so that you're not interacting

now of course in the long run it's

especially a high-end restaurant you

want the full table service but at the

moment I'm gonna have to get flexible I

also thought that you could add a little

tent card a little you know a sign

that's on the table there's the phone

numbers to text if you want to send a

message to the to the kitchen it's not

the chef who answers the phone but if

you want to send a message to the

kitchen or the front office or the

server or something you just text it and

there would be somebody whose job it is

just to take the text and tell whoever

it is that needs to be told so that's

one way you could avoid human contact

you might also want to relax local

zoning laws so you can expand sidewalks

out during warm weather it just may be

closed the streets you know for a while

for months just close any streets that

have a lot of restaurants on them

because usually there's not much parking

on the street anyway you don't lose that

much and usually there's an easier way

to get around then the street that has

all the restaurants so just close it let

the restaurants expand into the street

so you got lots of space around tables

and maybe even allow dogs in my town you

can't bring your dog to a restaurant

even if you're eating outside but what

if you could yeah at least temporarily

when do you like to bring your dog out

to dinner and you have monthly SH of

course a lot of people would like that

at least in my town that would be a big

thing and you can also imagine that

using the honor system because you could

never enforce this you would ask people

to come in and only in the at least in

the beginning with the people that

they're isolating with so if you're

isolated with your family you can bring

your family and send at a table at a

restaurant but you know what a mix

people who have been separately

isolating just because they went to a

restaurant

you could do that and maybe maybe if

it's a business meeting and you just

have to have people cross pollinating

you have some special places you know

away from other people something like

that but the larger idea is just to

rethink these things from scratch and

rather than say how do we get back to

where we were

think about how to make it better all

right I promised you that I would give

you the user interface for reality and

I'm working on a book idea an awful

writer do not but has to do with filters

and I was trying to think of all the

different filters that one can put on

life and I've argued that if you have an

experience in enough domains you can

look through more windows or another way

to say that is you bore it you have more

filters by which to understand the world

and I would contend this is not yet a

complete list and I might end up

combining some categories a little bit

but let's say this is about 90% right I

contend that these are the filters then

if you learned enough about these and

you wouldn't have to be an expert on any

of these things but if you learned you

know logic and religion

if you mating let me explain that one as

a filter what that means is to

understand let me get that guy out of

here bad person goes away all right

that's always satisfied did Soros Irish

get rid of the crazy people anymore all

right so

having gotten rid of our trolls so

mating is the idea that you can see the

world through the lens that everything

we do is to show off to get a mate even

if you have a mate we're just sort of

automatically designed for mating so if

you see the world through that lens you

can really understand a lot of a lot of

the world you should know a little bit

about statistics and science persuasion

economics

simu tation that's not a word let's call

it the simulation the simulation theory

that we might be a simulation the the

idea that some people just see the world

as winners and losers other people might

see it as predator and prey there's also

a strategy way to look at the world

there's an abundance mindset

yeah the abundance mindset is that

you're not taking things from other

people you're finding a way that

everybody gets something and then the

moist robot idea which might be

redundant just the idea that were were

dumb machines and irrational so my my

concept is this that if you knew enough

about these fields you would have the

user interface to reality and you would

be able to actually see your reality and

manipulate it almost in a god-like way I

said almost I'm not saying you're

omnipotent but that you could do things

which would not seem possible to people

who had fewer filters so the more

filters you have the more clear is you

know if you could see it like an analogy

you more clear the screen is and more

obvious than many of your choices are so

this probably would require a book to

really explain it well but the the

useful part of this is that you probably

don't need more of it examples

yeah we'll be a good example let's see

if I could pick one well all let's take

abundance so we have a problem with

their Communist China because it looks

like they think that the best thing for

China is for the United States to be

weaker so that's the opposite of an

abundance mindset president trungpa has

an abundance mindset he used it with

North Korea he's used it with President

Xi obviously is not working in China and

who knows what's happening in North

Korea but they don't seem to be mad at

us at the moment so that's good but the

president said hey if we work together

we both get richer if we stay enemies we

don't now obviously it seems that China

has some kind of winner loser

predator-prey mentality that there are

only people winning and losing and they

want to be on the winning team whereas

the president of course still has those

filters as well but he has extra filters

so he instead of you know obviously

knowing that if he went to China and

said hey it's a it's a win or lose

situation one of us could win and what

does go lose you know good luck we're

gonna win you're gonna lose that

wouldn't really get you very far

in negotiations but if you go into it if

you go into the negotiations with an

abundance mindset you get that you know

baby price of flexibility on the other

side all right so let me give you some

other examples I like to use this

example all the time if you understand

economics and you understand business

models then you probably understand that

it's very unlikely you'll get a speeding

ticket as 6:00 a.m. on a Sunday morning

now that's something that you could see

clearly if you have the economics filter

and if it's not obvious to you why

you're not going to get a ticket

as 6:00 a.m. on the subject morning no

matter how fast you speed it's because

you don't have that filter yet maybe

explain why the police department is

like every other organization they have

a budget and so they have to use the

budget where it makes sense and not

where it doesn't make sense otherwise

they'll run out of money and not be able

to do the things they need so given that

almost nobody has a car accident and

6:00 a.m. on a Sunday morning it's

probably the least likely time this

speeding is ever an actual safety

problem because there's just nobody

around and if they are they're not drunk

you know for the most part 6 a.m. I

would say not too many drugs and so you

will notice that economics would predict

it would predict that there are very few

speed traps at 6:00 a.m. on a Sunday

morning and I would argue that if you

live to be a hundred you might never see

one so that's a very trivial example but

I go through life with an understanding

of business models and economics that

does allow me to see to see around

corners I can literally predict based on

economics whether there's a a policeman

up ahead in that a speed trap order they

also often hide so in my house in my

neighborhood there's a place they often

stay and I can predict that accurately

as it turns out all right let's take

strategy a perfect example of that when

I wrote my book had a failed almost

everything and still win big I

introduced the idea of systems versus

goals and the idea of talent stacking

you know I've talked about him enough

that I don't need to explain him again

but in the context I'm talking about

here a lot of people wrote to me a lot a

lot of people and said my god when I

heard those things it really you know it

all came together and then I had a

strategy and then I could implement it

and it's already working so I would hear

tremendous things about people learning

that strategy and when I would hear it I

would say to myself you know when I

wrote that

the thing I was most worried about is

that people would say we already knew

that but I was hoping that people did

not have enough sort of background in

strategy to know that it makes sense to

layer your skills intelligently and it

makes sense to have systems versus goals

I didn't know if people didn't know that

until I wrote the book because you don't

really don't know what other people know

I thought it would be additive and it

turns out it was life-changing for a lot

of people so that's a perfect example

and the the strategy is not worth much

unless you have some understanding of

statistics and I don't I don't mean you

have to be able to do the math I mean

that you have to in a common-sense way

be able to look at things and say okay

that's more likely than that under these

conditions you wouldn't be able to tell

what's true versus the margin of error

I'm talking about the big you know the

big big level stuff

for example here's a perfect example the

headline this week was that there was a

study of Santa Clara residents and they

found that I forget the exact number but

somewhere in the range of two percent of

them seemed to have the antibodies for

AK rotavirus but and that would indicate

maybe was a lot more of it in the

general population but anybody assumed

now Balaji Srinivasan who if you don't

follow him on Twitter you should he has

a background that would include you know

all the credible knowledge but most

importantly he understood statistics and

he understood how to read the the

document and he looked at and said wait

a minute according to this the the the

reliability of the test is that it could

have false positives up to like in that

same neighborhood in that same I'm

rounding everything off to make it

simple but that the false positives

could be in that same neighborhood so in

other words it was a whole study that

either showed that nothing that nothing

happened or

that there's wildly more virus and the

completely complete opposites

and they're both demonstrated by the

same data now did you know that when you

read this study did you know that I mean

I didn't even look at the details and

I'm not sure I would have picked it out

if I had but the point is the more you

do about statistics the more you can

just look look right past people's

assertions to the truth now the logic

could do that I couldn't now that

doesn't mean that the study is bogus

it just means that you can't be sure

which is completely different than we're

sure that there's tons of virus in the

world that we don't know about it

there's a big difference between well it

could be true and oh it's totally true

we just study that those are there's not

that similar alright

see do you want some other oh here's

some other examples the I said winners

and losers on here but you could send

victims some victims and winners I

suppose victims and oppressors so if you

see the world in terms of victims

there's a good chance you're gonna think

you are one and when you start thinking

you are one your filter just starts

producing evidence of it confirmation

bias and that can be a very frustrating

and also maybe not too close to reality

view of the world so that's a that's a

bad filter a better filter is that

you're not a victim and that you have a

lot of control over your life so that's

just a better filter anyway I don't want

to talk about the details of these I'm

just asserting that there might be how

many things aren't there here so there

might be under 15 filters that can

explain just about everything you see in

life and I and I've said before that

when I when I was very young I sought to

understand the user interface for a

reality and I actually have dedicated my

life literally

to try to figure out why things are the

way they are and why it works and what

can you do differently and this is this

is sort of the result of it that I

started layering different skills

together especially a degree in

economics so I can understand that

filter all right I was asked to give you

some sleeping tips for tonight and I'm

gonna do that and I'm gonna do it more

easily this time so those of you who

don't want to get sleepy yet you might

want to sign off now and I wish wish you

a good night

maybe I'll see you in the morning I hope

so those of you who would like to relax

before sleep and see if they can get an

even better night's sleep than they have

recently recently this will be the

portion in which I calm you down and

prep you for a great night's sleep

it goes like this take a deep breath

from the bottom of your your lungs not

the top a lot of your lungs then exhale

out your nose well actually actually out

of your mouth would be fine inhale

through your nose and exhale through

your mouth and it's funny you don't

realize that during the day your tension

will make your breath that shallower and

shallower and if you simply breathe and

the way you want to feel your breath

will take you there so if you take large

relaxed deep breaths with no no tension

into your chest

it just automatically takes you to that

place it does it pretty quickly now make

sure that you're in a relaxed place that

requires no muscles to stay in the

position you are you can be sitting up

you keep your leg down it doesn't matter

and now again think of the muscles in

your hand your hand should be down not

up like mine is but squeeze your hand

and make our tight fist and just hold it

until you don't think you can hold it

anymore and when you don't think you can

hold it anymore just relax it just let

it all go

I just know how it feels all the tension

is out of your hand

and out do the same thing with your

other hand and then to your feet you can

just run through the run through the

sequence on your own time and you will

be amazed that just concentrating on one

body part squeezing it tightening it and

relaxing it moving it all the way around

your body will be amazing you'll be

amazed at how well that works now here's

the big payoff I taught you before and

many of you were on this periscope that

if I counted it to 20 because I'm a

trained hypnotist and if anybody didn't

know that here's your warning that this

is hypnosis but there's nothing sneaky

to it I'm just helping you relax if

you'd like to enjoy that stick around if

you would not like to be hypnotized that

while I would not call this hypnosis per

se yeah there's no actual transit halt

it would make you relaxed if you don't

want that this would be the time to find

something else to do but I'm going to

count to 20 and you're going to hear my

voice

if you're wearing headphones much more

effective and when you want to relax

later tonight you're going to hear my

voice but you'll be controlling the

counting of my voice you'll count from

zero to 20 when you reach 20 you'll be

really relaxed and it'll be prepping you

to drift off into a nice sleep and I'm

going to start right now and every time

I count higher one you start getting

sleepier and more relaxed - and going

deeper three and now going deeper and

deeper for five and now much deeper

twice as deep now six seven eight and

going deeper doesn't matter if I skip a

number ten

I could skip to numbers 12 and you would

just get deeper and deeper and more

relaxed and now as I head toward 20

toward the deepest and most relaxing

sleep you've experienced in a long time

15 16 and going deeper 17 and I was so

relaxed feeling good 18 and now I'm

going to count backwards as part of an

exercise in which when you wake up a

little bit but not all the way and then

I count you back to or 20

you'll be deeper than if you I just go

into 20 in the first place so now 14 13

12 you feel yourself getting a little

bored awake a little more alert 9 8 7

you're about 1/2 more alert now 6 5 and

now we'll go back to 27 feel yourself

relaxing see how much quicker it is than

the first times you tried this 8 going

deeper 9 you feel your body just sinking

into the into whatever you're on 10 11

going much deeper now now twice as deep

14 going deeper 15 16 much much deeper

now 17 18 and going deeper 19

20 and now completely relaxed almost

floating it feels good now 21 22 deeper

than you thought was possible and this

is why you'll remember when you try to

relax later you'll remember the counting

you remember how you felt and you'll be

able to reproduce it just by remembering

it and counting yourself to 20 but now

I'm going to bring you back so that you

can get ready for your evening and

whatever is whatever's next 19 18 17

started to wake up 16 15 14 about

halfway there 10 8 7 almost awake no 6 5

you're gonna feel really good when you

wake up 4 oh my goodness it's gonna feel

great when you wake up 3 2 1

open your eyes if they're not already

open you're completely alert but more

relaxed and later when you you talk to

yourself back to 20 you're gonna have an

amazing sleep then I'll leave you with

that have a great night