Episode 547 Scott Adams - How to Win on Social Media for 2020
If you would like my channel to have a wider audience and higher production quality, please donate via my startup (Whenhub.com) at this link: https://interface.my/ScottAdamsSays I use donations to pay for the daily conversions of the original Periscope videos into Youtube and podcast form, and to improve my production quality and search results over time. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Start your day feeling good…your whole day just seems to go great Middle East is better situated for peace possibilities then ever before President Trump and Chairman Kim having fun at Joe Biden’s expense The Netflix of online education, a free market system for classes Online education CAN become good enough to replace regular classes Anti-Abortion states and the financial impact Candace Owens is making something obvious to African-Americans What to do about social media determining who wins in 2020 WaPo has conflated crime and black people…that’s just wrong
Hey everybody, it's time for Coffee with Scott Adams and the simultaneous sip. Why is this so important, you ask yourself? Well, let me explain. Have you ever noticed that when you're in a bad mood, everything seems to go bad that day? But if you're in a good mood, it seems like everything goes wel…
View segment →you one thing: if you start your day in a good mood, chances are the rest of your day is going to be a lot better. And one of the ways to do that is to join me for the simultaneous sip, an unparalleled pleasure, probably the best way to start the morning of all time. All you need is a cup or a mug…
View segment →ice, stein, a tankard, possibly a thermos, maybe a flask. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the simultaneous sip. And if you haven't learned to do the "ahh" part, you should really get on that because it really makes a difference. All right. Well, I'm full of goo…
View segment →media that I had an idea that could change the world. And I was willing to sell that idea. I did it as an experiment to see if anybody would fund a company based on an idea. And I actually got a company to say yes. And they sent me a contract and said, yeah, that idea is so good that we will actuall…
View segment →tly Netflix is rethinking, speaking of Netflix, two Netflix-related stories. And you know one day the real Netflix is thinking about rethinking their investment in Georgia under the condition that these so-called heartbeat bills about abortion get passed. Now they didn't say they pull out. They said…
View segment →citizens wanted him to be elected? And of course other people did too but I think that was the deciding part. And likewise with this upcoming election. If black voters decided that they just couldn't vote for Trump, you would have a lot of trouble getting reelected. If they decide that some of them…
View segment →the lines of you know you keep saying this and this is why you're wrong. Yes they put words in my mouth. You can't fix that. The people who say but what you're really thinking, you can't fix that. All right, here's a little lesson on persuasion that I'd like to try out because you might need to use…
View segment →who is trying to equate black people and crime. Which bothers me honestly. Like I'm not saying this as some clever little thing. You know persuasion wise it is persuasion and I am teaching you to do that but it fricking bothers me. It bothers me that the racists are accusing somebody who is not that…
View segment →Hey everybody, it's time for Coffee with Scott Adams and the simultaneous sip. Why is this so important, you ask yourself? Well, let me explain.
Have you ever noticed that when you're in a bad mood, everything seems to go bad that day? But if you're in a good mood, it seems like everything goes well that day. Have you ever noticed that? Not every single thing, but it seems like when you're in a good mood you have more good things happen. When you're in a bad mood it looks like the universe is conspiring against you. I know you've noticed that. It's probably not a coincidence. It could be because reality is subjective and you're actually creating reality as you go. We don't know if that's true. We don't know if you're creating reality. We don't know if maybe it just seems that way. But I can tell you one thing: if you start your day in a good mood, chances are the rest of your day is going to be a lot better. And one of the ways to do that is to join me for the simultaneous sip, an unparalleled pleasure, probably the best way to start the morning of all time.
All you need is a cup or a mug or glass, a chalice, stein, a tankard, possibly a thermos, maybe a flask. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the simultaneous sip. And if you haven't learned to do the "ahh" part, you should really get on that because it really makes a difference.
All right. Well, I'm full of good news today. I'm probably going to do more good news and bad news from now on. I'm going to become your source of dopamine, that chemical that makes you feel good all day.
So the first thing we should know is that we're coming into the summer news cycle. What is different about the summer news cycle? There's not much news. So we're going to be entering the period where the news sort of dies. There won't be necessarily, I mean there could be, but chances are there's not a lot happening over the summer. Last summer was so slow that by August the news was so dead that the President of the United States invited me in to have a chat. I'm not even making that up. Yeah, you know, last August the news was so slow, you know, Congress was off doing their summer vacations or whatever, that literally the President of the United States said, "No, it's quiet. Call back that Dilbert guy and we'll chat for a little while." Now he was talking to a lot of people that summer. I think he was just using the time to shore up his base, which was very smart.
But summer is coming and there isn't a lot of bad news for this president. Indeed the only news that is sort of brewing looks like it's maybe more good news than bad news. And so the Democrats are probably just having a cow right now, so to say. Can you have a cow? That doesn't make sense. I need to have a cow. There's that like giving birth to a cow. It makes no sense. I think it's the same anyway. They're going to desperately need some bad news to give them something to talk about for the summer. It doesn't look like it's going to be served up.
If you look at the Middle East peace plan that Jared is looking into, there are two possibilities. One, nothing good will come of it, which would be largely what everybody would expect. So that's not really bad news. That would be, well, we tried again, nothing happened. But there is something different about the Middle East right now that we've never seen before. We have never seen a time in history when the Middle East was as well situated for peace, some kind of a comprehensive peace, in which the Palestinians and the Israelis and the Iranians at minimum made some kind of a deal. And what I mean by that is that everybody is flexible in a way they had never been before. So you have the most flexible group of countries, more flexible than they've ever been, for different reasons. I'll talk about that. At the same time you probably have the strongest leaders and the most, I would say, the most flexible leaders, the people who have the most strength and flexibility at the same time, which is really, really something you don't want to lose.
I mean the fact that Jared Kushner is trying to make something happen, I think he knows that there may never be a better time. Here's why. Saudi Arabia, with all of the issues that we know about with Khashoggi and everything else, has still maintained a good relationship with the United States at great political cost to President Trump. President Trump invested a lot of political capital in keeping Saudi Arabia in our friend circle even if maybe they haven't earned it. That's an asset the president created. He had nothing. This is what he does better than anything. He creates something out of nothing. Because that's something that Saudi Arabia really, really needs: to redeem itself in the Middle East, redeem itself with the world. What could be a better way than some kind of comprehensive peace plan?
Meanwhile, the other big player, the Iranians. You know, if Iran is forced into some kind of a deal, that means that their proxies also have pressure to make a deal. So if you get Iran, you probably make a lot of progress with all the proxies, maybe with the Palestinians as well. And it looks to me like Iran, the way they're talking and the way they're acting, is that they realize they're going to have to do something different to get a different result than what they have right now. And what they have right now is a bad situation. Their economy is getting strangled in a way it's never been strangled before. We've never had this level of economic pressure on them. And to the point where it could bring down the regime in a year or two. If they don't do anything, if they don't make a big change, they're probably going to fail in a year or two. So time is not on their side. And that makes them flexible.
Now they tried flexing their military muscle a little bit just to see if they could change the variables. And President Trump quickly shut that down by sailing much of our naval assets into the area just to say, maybe you should not do this. And it looks like the Iranians decided maybe we shouldn't do this. So I would say Iran is more flexible than they've ever been because there's more pressure than there's ever been. And they're getting close to the total failure point.
Saudi Arabia's got money, influence, etc. Other countries in the region that have worked with us before, they've got money. They're probably getting flexible too. And then you've got Israel. Israel is coming from a point of strength right now. And if Netanyahu continues being their leader, he's got a great relationship with the president. And he's made at least peace gestures towards the people of Iran. And he seems to be the right person, the right set of skills, the right badass personality to make a deal. Because it helps that you're a hardliner if you're trying to make peace, because then the threat of war is still credible. And everybody knows you're doing it from the right reasons. It's not because you're weak.
So I'm not going to go so far as to predict that there will be Middle East peace. I think you'd have to be foolish to make that prediction after a zillion years of no peace. But I will say unambiguously we've never had this set of variables where everybody's flexible at the same time for different reasons. And we have really strong leaders in all those countries. So even the Ayatollah, no matter what you think about him, he's a strong leader and he could make something happen if he needs to. Then maybe he will not be the leader in a year. So things could change.
All right, so there's that. Then of course there's the whole situation with Bill Barr looking into the origins of the Russia investigation. Certainly there will be no good news coming out of that for Democrats. We don't know what will come of it, but it's not going to be good news for Democrats. So they've got a tough, tough summer coming up. It looks like it's going to be a summer of unparalleled economic success, maybe something positive looking in the Middle East. Kim Jong-un remains friends with President Trump apparently.
And by the way, people have joked about this but it's not really a joke. When Kim Jong-un started insulting John Bolton, he was pacing most of the electorate in the United States. It was one of those weird situations in which everybody came together but we didn't see it coming. When Kim Jong-un said that, what did he call Bolton? He called the national security, so North Korea's government called National Security Advisor John Bolton quote a warmonger and quote a defective human product. And most of the people in the United States saw that and they said, yeah, that's not too far off. You know, I'm not going to put up a counter to that argument at the moment.
John Bolton is somebody that largely the people on both the right and the left are pretty wary of. I will go even further and say if we did not have a President Trump to make sure that Bolton's instincts have some kind of a counter, and it's a superior counter, if we didn't have that, I don't know if I would talk about anything else except getting rid of him. Like nothing would be more important to the well-being of the world and the country than removing John Bolton from office if you didn't have a President Trump who I think is a reliable counter to his impulses. You put them together and they're actually a really strong team. This has been said many times but it has to be said again: Bolton is the bad cop. And he does create a useful asset that the president has skillfully used to say, well, you know, it'd be good to be friends with me because I can make good things happen. I can help your economy. I can avoid war. I can do everything you want. I have everything you want and I'm willing to help you with it. But if that doesn't work out, have you met John Bolton? Because he's got some ideas that you might not like so much. So they're a great team.
But when Kim Jong-un insults Bolton, most of the United States says, well, finally we're on the same page with this. Now Bolton does have his supporters so I don't want to exaggerate that. But it is humorous that the worst thing happening with North Korea right now, think about it, the worst thing happening with North Korea in the United States is the president, President Trump, is having fun with it. You know, he's joking about Joe Biden. People in the United States are saying, well, if Kim Jong-un is just insulting John Bolton, Kim Jong-un, he's not dumb. At least he thinks like we do on some things. So that's pretty funny.
All right. I talked about, I did a special Periscope yesterday. Had to do that. You listed about Trump's hilarious tweet in which he said, I was actually sticking up for Sleepy Joe Biden while on foreign soil. Kim Jong-un called him a quote low IQ idiot and many other things, whereas I related to Chairman Kim as a much softer quote low IQ individual. Who could possibly be upset with that?
Now do you remember a couple years ago when people were saying it was popular for people to say, I hope this behavior doesn't become normalized. Don't normalize this behavior. This president cannot be normalized. Whatever you do, don't normalize him. And I look at this quote and I think, aren't you glad this got normalized? I mean seriously, can you tell me you're not happy that this got normalized? This is funny. It's fun. It doesn't hurt anybody. It's just good clean fun. And the fact that President Trump brought in Kim Jong-un as part of the joke just makes it funnier. And you know Kim Jong-un probably saw this and said, okay, that's pretty funny. Don't you think Kim Jong-un saw this and said, okay, well there's two things we agree on. John Bolton's kind of a wild card and Joe Biden's kind of a low IQ individual. So it's probably the healthiest, maybe the healthiest sign you could ever see is that Trump and Kim Jong-un are sort of joking about Joe Biden. There's no way that's bad. You could try to turn that into something bad but it is not. It is whatever the opposite of war is. If you were to make a continuum where you know there's good stuff on this side and all the way to war on this side, we're as far away from war as you can get when you're making jokes. Jokes are a good place to be.
All right. There was a huge thing that happened recently that the news will not recognize as anything. It will be completely, it will never be news. You'll never see a headline. And I feel this strongly by the way, one of the most important things happening in the world right now. And I might be biased because some of you remember I guess a few years ago I had teased on social media that I had an idea that could change the world. And I was willing to sell that idea. I did it as an experiment to see if anybody would fund a company based on an idea. And I actually got a company to say yes. And they sent me a contract and said, yeah, that idea is so good that we will actually give you a percentage of the company just for the idea. And some internal changes happened at the company and they ended up not being able to complete the contract, which was independent of whether it was a good idea. So I had an idea that I thought would change the world. A company was willing to fund it. And I didn't even have to do anything, which was very unusual because that's not a normal situation. People don't pay for ideas. That just doesn't happen. Nobody pays for an idea unless it's such a good idea.
Here's the idea. Y Combinator, which is probably the most prestigious startup incubator in the country, maybe the world, you announced that one of their companies raised money. It's called Outschool, O U T S C H O O L E R, one word, Outschooler. They got investments. And what they are, they describe themselves as quote the Netflix of education online, the Netflix of online education. What that means is exactly the idea that I tried to sell unsuccessfully to this company. And that idea is to have a marketplace where anybody can create a class, just like Netflix is a marketplace where anybody can create a movie. And if they make a good movie, Netflix will consider putting that on their platform. If you make a good TV show, then Netflix will put it on the platform. And so they have done the thing that is, somebody's saying Udemy does that. I'm making a stark difference between classes that a company puts on a platform versus a platform that lets anybody put content there if they meet certain requirements. Now I'm not an expert on the other companies doing that so there may be some other companies who are already in the business, which would be all good news. So the point is that the education field had never been subject to competition, to free market competition.
If you have a platform that you own, you control who the instructors are, etc., that's not exactly a free market enough situation. But if you have something that's really a Netflix for education, then even I, I mean literally me, I could make a class. So I can say to myself, you know what kids who are 14 through 18 need to learn? Well they need to learn about maybe systems over goals. Maybe they need to learn about persuasion. Maybe they need to learn how to write. I could make a class and I could put it on there. And if people like my class I could make money. Somebody's saying what about IQ? Yeah, and YouTube could do this as well. But as the free market allows people to compete for online, here's the big thing. Here's the big idea for all of this. Online training has the potential to be so inexpensive it's effectively free. We're very close to the point where online education will become good enough that people will prefer it over going in person. We're not there yet. Right now going in person is still up here. Doing it online is still down here. There are exceptions. Certainly there are bad in-person teachers and good online things that might be better. But in general, on average, in person is still better than online.
But these free market classes will allow people to compete just like movies do. And the quality of the online is just going to keep going up. The quality of in-person education is not going to get much better. It's sort of as good as it's going to be. But online will keep getting better because of these free market forces. The moment it crosses over, the only thing missing is the certifications, the credibility, the part where you say I got a degree and it means something. That is almost certainly going to change in the next five to ten years, maybe sooner. And all it requires is people with enough credibility. I always use Bill Gates as my example because he works for lots of examples. If Bill Gates ever says publicly, here's the deal, if you take these specific classes online I will award you the Gates Foundation Bachelor's of Education or whatever it is, whatever the classes, the moment he does that people are going to say, well that's the thing. Bill Gates looked into it. He's credible. If he says this is a college degree, that's a college degree. If Warren Buffett says if you take these classes online you have a degree in my opinion, I will give you the Warren Buffett college degree certification, that means something. Now not everybody could do that but people who have enough credibility could certainly do that. Could President Trump do that? Yes he could. President Trump through the administration, not him personally. Yeah let's not call it Trump University. I guess that's the problem. So forget what I said about President Trump. Let's make it a government certification. The government could say we're going to certify college degrees online as collections of classes if they meet certain criteria. And the government could say here are the criteria. And anybody who meets it can say I got the government four-year degree, whatever that is.
All right. Somebody said America First University. Hmm, maybe. But the larger point here is that when I say that I love Bernie, which I often say, I say it because I want all the things he wants. Except as you can see it is often the case that capitalism can get you, can deliver what socialism promises. So socialism promises you free education but it doesn't have to get it. Capitalism doesn't promise you anything but it might give you free education. In fact I will upgrade my might to it will at this point. There's absolutely nothing that will stop this from happening because the free market will give you increased quality of online education. It will cross over in-person education and it won't take long. Three years maybe. I'd say three to five years and online education will be functionally completely superior to in-person. But it may not have the credibility until people start blessing certain sets of classes. But we're going to get there. So we have free education is going to happen. Free college is going to happen. Nothing could stop it. Bernie doesn't even have to do a darn thing. He doesn't have to promise anything. He doesn't have to get out of bed in the morning. Bernie's going to get free college. He just has to wait. That's three to five years.
All right, so that's the other good news. Apparently Netflix is rethinking, speaking of Netflix, two Netflix-related stories. And you know one day the real Netflix is thinking about rethinking their investment in Georgia under the condition that these so-called heartbeat bills about abortion get passed. Now they didn't say they pull out. They said they did rethink their investment. But what I predicted was that these states that make abortion impossible through whatever legislation or other means, those states will be so economically damaged that it will limit how many states are willing to do this. So I do think some states will become no-abortion states. That seems likely. But they will suffer economically because companies will decide not to go there.
And probably this is my other prediction from long ago. It seems to me that apps will form, sort of like the GoFundMe apps, in which somebody can finance travel to another state to get an abortion. So if several southern states make abortion impossible or the clinics move away because it's too hard to operate there, there will be an app, I guarantee it. I don't know who's going to make it but I guarantee this will happen. There will be an app that says I need an abortion and I'm in the wrong state. What do I do? And you're going to find all the resources for somebody to give you a ride. You'll find somebody to stay with, somebody to make sure that you're okay when you're in this other state, and a ride back home. They might even help you fund it. It's possible.
All right, so some apps will, somebody mentioned my startup's app WhenHub. And I wasn't thinking about that when I mentioned this but WhenHub allows you to talk to any expert about anything. And one of those things you could do is connect to somebody who could solve this problem for you. I'm not recommending it. That's not what the app was made for. But it's a general purpose app in which any expert can talk to any person for a fee or for free. They don't have to have a fee.
All right, let me talk about the Washington Post. So somebody associated with the Washington Post, one of their central players, recently tweeted that although President Trump is talking about Biden's 1994 crime bill, and President Trump cleverly said that Democrats can't vote for somebody who was supportive, I love the way he put it. He didn't say that's going to be a problem or that works against you. Whatever. He actually said in direct language that African Americans can't vote for somebody who was involved with that crime bill. Now of course they can. But let me frame it this way.
Many of you remember that maybe a year ago or so I was having conversations with Black Lives Matter leader Hawk Newsome. And one of the things I was telling him is that as long as Democrats have all of the votes, as long as they have all of the votes of the black population, they don't have to deliver anything. And I also said that if Republicans could deliver anything, just anything for the black population, that you would have developed a competitive situation for the first time.
Now let me give incredible credit to Candace Owens. Candace Owens, and you know I think more than a lot of other people, there are lots of people who were involved with this, but she seems to be the most effective voice for letting people understand there's an option to vote Republican if they are so inclined. So she's done the best job of making that competitive situation. And because the president was successful with prison reform, he now has something specific to talk about. This is, look, Democrats couldn't give you this. I gave you this. Now there are a few other things he can talk about with unemployment and such but they seem a little less direct. Unemployment seems like, well that's something you did for white people. It just happened to be good for black people too. You know if you were inclined to think of things in racist ways it would be easy to imagine that that was an accomplishment. It was just something that happened. But the prison reform thing looks like a direct act. It looks like something that was done that has a disproportionate benefit for the African American community. And nobody had to do it. Yeah I think he would agree the president could have not done prison reform and his supporters probably wouldn't care one way or the other. Would you agree that's largely the case? It wasn't something he did for the base. It was something he did for the country because it made sense and because he could. That was it. It made sense and he could do it so he did it. Exactly what you would like to see any of your government do. It made sense so they did it.
But that has created now a competitive situation for the first time. It is obvious to the African American community, and I think really for the first time, it's obvious that they can completely control this election. That's a big statement but let me say it again because it's true. The black community, African Americans in the United States, citizens, they will determine, or at least they could determine, it's up to them, who the next president is. That's not too strong a statement is it? Because you know it's going to be close no matter what. You know that if enough of the black vote goes Republican to maintain this competitive situation where the Democrats really have to offer something, they haven't offered anything. Republicans have. Let's get some competition. Let's see the Democrats offer something that's so good that even the Republicans have to agree. Let's see the Republicans offer something that's so good that even the Democrats have to agree.
So congratulations Candace Owens, Larry Elder, all the folks who have worked with the president who have tried to create this exact situation. This situation is as perfectly crafted as you ever would want it to be. You want people to, yeah and Kanye, Kanye and yes so Kanye and Kim Kardashian. You have to give them, Kim Kardashian West, you have to give them all kinds of credit because they created a competitive situation.
Now I don't think that every black person should vote Republican by any means. What I think is that they should vote for whoever is going to help them the most in their opinion, wherever that takes them. But think about this situation. How many years ago was it when slavery was the law of the land or at least popular in the South? How many years ago was that? A few hundred years ago. And here we are in 2019. We're coming off eight years of an African American president. And 160 people are giving me different numbers so a while ago. Both correct me if I'm wrong. The black voters of this country are going to decide the next president. Is that wrong? Is it wrong to say that the black voters actually have control of the country right now if they want it? If they don't want it they don't have it. And you know certainly when black voters decided, hey this Barack Obama guy looks kind of good. We'd like to have a president who looks like us. Did they not decide who was the president? Could you not say conclusively that Barack Obama was elected because black citizens wanted him to be elected? And of course other people did too but I think that was the deciding part.
And likewise with this upcoming election. If black voters decided that they just couldn't vote for Trump, you would have a lot of trouble getting reelected. If they decide that some of them want to vote for him, he'll probably get elected. So I would say it's kind of down to the black vote. And they've created this perfect competitive situation.
And I hate to be the one who's got all the good news but this is the golden age. This is the point where the black population figured out how to get stuff. Now one of the things that Hawk Newsome said that I can never get out of my mind, it's just so smart in terms of how to frame things. He said that if this country does something that's good for the black community it always helps the country. And when you first hear that you think well that can't be true in every case, right? But it's hard to find an exception. If you do things that are good for the black population in this country you do end up doing things that are good for everybody. You know, unless you limit it somehow by race which we would not do.
All right, so let's get to the fun part. I made you wait. I wanted to tell you because people have been asking me if social media is going to put their finger on the scale. And social media is powerful enough that they can essentially decide who will get elected president. You know they would even have more power than African Americans because everybody is subject to the same persuasion, right? So the social media could persuade black voters one way or the other and they would have a lot of influence over that. But what can you do about that? So I want to talk about that. So don't leave because I'm going to tell you what to do if you're worried that social media is going to determine the election. You might like this and you might not.
Here's my suggestion for all of you. This is what you can do. Not the government. Not talking about what Trump does or this administration. I'm going to tell you what you can do. All right, here's what you can do. Don't get kicked off of social media. That's number one. Don't get kicked off of social media. You know what you're doing when you're doing something edgy. You know when you've gone too far. You know when you're pushing the boundaries. Don't. There's no law that says you have to push the boundary. Think about any tweet that got anybody kicked off of social media. Think about it. Any tweet that ever got somebody kicked off of social media or even put in jail on social media, was that tweet important to the person's life? Never. Never. The tweets that get people kicked off of social media are never important. They're never important. They're just something that was over a line. So you got kicked off. So don't do that. If you get temporarily kicked off because you've got a bad tweet or a bad post and all you have to do is remove it, remove it right away. Don't take your own power away.
All right, next: grow your followers. Figure out how to grow your following because then you'll have more voice. The more people who follow you, the more influence you have. So do what you can to learn how to grow your user base and how to participate effectively. You should follow each other to boost your signal. If you're following a number of voices on the right and you would like even more people on the right to have more power, follow some extra people. Figure out who you think is influential and then boost their signals by following them.
And then next: learn persuasion. If you haven't read my book "Win Bigly" you should do it because social media can have a big influence in terms of decisions they make about what you see. But you can also have a big influence by simply learning how to be more persuasive. So read my book "Win Bigly," follow my Periscopes and try out some of the techniques. Be visual. Don't be obscene because the other stuff gets more virality. Over the next year I will teach you more tips about how to be persuasive and that will help.
But here's the big one. So this is the one to remember. I'm going to be modeling this going forward on social media. When Trump was first running for election it felt like those who were supporting him were pirates. It was like he was the head pirate and he had a band of pirates doing things that were edgy and dangerous and sometimes could get you kicked off of social media. Things that were maybe on the border of ethical behavior, some of it well beyond that. It was a pirate situation. And then he won. Is it appropriate to take your pirate mentality to reelection when this president is successful in all the normal ways that you want success? It's not.
So here's the suggestion: become nice. It's really powerful. If people will support the president, simply block everybody who makes a personal comment and never see that person again. You can live first of all a life of far less stress but you will also take it to a higher level. You can be at a level of maturity that will be hard to fight against. It's time to raise your game. It's time to bring the way you talk about things. It's time to take your persona, align your maturity. It's time to take it up a level and recognize that you won. You won. You got your president. For those of you who are Trump supporters, you want to act like a winner. You don't need to act like a pirate anymore. You don't need to argue with the irrational.
I'm watching online as there's one particular troll who's been bothering all the people in my timeline because they keep doing this loop where you prove them wrong and then they go back to the original point that you proved wrong before. Her name is Emily. I blocked her but I didn't block all the people who were still interacting with her so I keep seeing their end of it. Please block her. I mean if any of you who are dealing with this Emily troll, she's not a real citizen having a real conversation. She's not. She is a troll. She's in it for whatever reaction she's getting. Don't give it to her.
So from now on I'm going to completely reverse my pattern online. I used to take a personal insult and then insult them back and it was fun. You know, mostly it was fun. I did it to practice. I did it because people would laugh at my replies etc. But I'm going to stop doing that as of today. I'm going to start giving people no second chance. So if somebody comes in with their stupid laundry list, oh but your president is a big old racist and here's the 10 things that I hallucinate he did, block. Because that person is not a real voice. That person is a person who's got an act. They came to bother you and they came to boost their own signal because if you interact with the trolls you're giving them more visibility and you're making their day. You're giving them exactly what they want. Don't give them what they want. Just shut them down. You can completely shut down the effectiveness of the other side by blocking them on the first offense.
So from now on, first offense if it's personal. So here are the rules. I don't block anybody for disagreeing with what I said. I don't block anybody for saying oh here's a link you didn't consider this. Disagreement, completely acceptable. And if I ever violate that line I know that you'll keep me honest. All right? But the moment it's personal, don't wait for the second thing. Don't answer and don't wait for a second insult. Remove. Just like that.
Now the other people I remove are the people who try to read my mind in public. So there are quite a few people who will tweet and they'll include me in tweets and they'll say something like, well Scott will block you for having a, people like to say this, Scott will block you for proving him wrong online. Okay, if you say that I will block you because I don't do that. So anybody who tries to read my mind and say in public what they think I'm thinking, you're always wrong. So I'm going to block you instantly because somebody like that doesn't ever go away if you interact with them. If you let them go they'll just keep saying more of this stuff. So get rid of it.
All right. Now at the same time if you are successfully acting nice online, eventually that's going to become a story because social media is doing something for you that looks terrible but might not work out as terrible as you think. What the social media platforms are doing ahead of the 2020 election, and maybe just because it's ordinary business, they're getting rid of the most provocative voices on social media. They are doing both sides. All right, you could argue that it's not equal and you know I'm sure that's an argument worth having. But the Krassensteins have been banned. Who was the other guy who got banned recently? Anyway the point is there are bans on both sides. I wouldn't worry too much about the fact that there are more conservatives being banned because if the people being banned, Farrakhan got banned. So what's happening is the voices on the right that are the ones that would ruin your reputation are being knocked off the system.
Now Woods is a special case because he's not really banned. All he has to do is get rid of one tweet that has no importance. Don't put James Woods into the category of real people who say things and get banned. It's a different situation. He could be back the moment he gets rid of one tweet. There's no importance. So that's a choice. And likewise if you're in the James Woods situation where in his opinion the thing he got banned for was a famous quote and it was not really a call to violence, he's resting on principle apparently. I don't want to read his mind but it looks like he's making a principled stand that free speech is free speech and it doesn't matter if somebody else reinterpreted it wrong. That's not the point. So I understand that point. I accept it. It's credible. It's real. But if you want to be effective I don't think that's working. So it's a principled stand that I don't think works. Do you know what would work? Staying on social media and saying things that are healthy and good and persuasive. That would help. What did James Woods do for you? All right, when he's online he's a powerful voice that has a productive outcome. When he allows himself to be banned over a tweet that has no importance to anybody in the world, is he helping you? He's not. He's not helping you. He's not changing anything. He's not helping himself. He's just got a little vacation from social media. So don't be James Woods. You know I say again I'll respect a principled stand and he seems to be taking that so I do respect that. I'm just saying that it doesn't help anything. It's not effective. It's not effective at all.
All right, so be nice on social media. Block the trolls immediately. Do not interact with them. Don't let them put words in your mouth. So the other people I will delete is if I get into a conversation online and they say something along the lines of you know you keep saying this and this is why you're wrong. Yes they put words in my mouth. You can't fix that. The people who say but what you're really thinking, you can't fix that.
All right, here's a little lesson on persuasion that I'd like to try out because you might need to use this one. I started on this point and I'm circling back to it. So the Washington Post, I guess there might have been their Washington bureau chief, doesn't matter who it was, he tweeted that the president is going to have problems criticizing Biden for his 1994 crime bill because the president quote has his own problems with the Central Park Five situation which was also a long time ago.
Now here's the thing. The Central Park Five thing, President Trump did a full-page ad in which he was complaining about crime and said maybe we should have the death penalty for these horrible crimes. He did not mention race although there was obviously the context was that the five African American gentlemen who had been arrested and later were acquitted or released, I forget what, but that they were found not guilty. He believed they were guilty but their race was never part of the conversation. Trump never mentioned race. He mentioned crime. We have seen quite clearly that he talks about crime as crime. And when it came to for example the prison reform bill, President Trump did not say oh we can't do that because it's good for black people. You know he went ahead and did it because it's good for people.
So when the Washington Post said he's got this problem because of this Central Park Five situation decades ago, here's the right response and it's the one that I gave. I said that the Washington Post has equated crime and black people and they need to explain that because that's what happened. I'm not making that up. President Trump talked about crime. That's it. He talked about crime and the death penalty. If other people say that's about race you can't make that argument unless you are introducing into the conversation that crime and black people are equated. That is racist. Criticizing the president for making a stand about crime without mentioning race and then going in and saying hey this is some kind of racist anti-black people, the only way you can make that criticism is if you yourself are a racist who has decided that crime and black people are somehow paired. The president didn't do that. He never did that. He never has done that. And I'm pretty sure he never will because there's no evidence that he thinks that way. He does hate crime. That is as clear as possible. There's no doubt anyplace in my mind that he's anti-crime. Like seriously, seriously anti-crime. And he can still do a crime bill because it made sense and it was good for the country.
Somebody's saying I don't agree with you on all issues but this point is the reason I follow you. Thank you. So if you're in the situation and I know you will be between now and 2020, somebody's going to bring up the Central Park Five. Your response to it should be Trump never mentioned race. That's all you should say about Trump. The rest of what you should say is about the fricking jerk who is trying to equate black people and crime. Which bothers me honestly. Like I'm not saying this as some clever little thing. You know persuasion wise it is persuasion and I am teaching you to do that but it fricking bothers me. It bothers me that the racists are accusing somebody who is not that way of being a racist. It's like extra bothering. That there's some form of projection going on there. I ain't using that word projection because I'm not a psychologist so I withdraw that word. I actually mocked that word in my upcoming book.
All right, that's all I got today. So I hope this little dose of dopamine was good. I'm going to keep working on the dopamine angle for these Periscopes. And by the way if you did not know these Periscopes get downloaded in an hour so they will be available on YouTube. To find them you would just search for the phrase "real coffee with Scott Adams." Remember the real part. Real Coffee with Scott Adams. And then you can have them the YouTube experience if you prefer that. The live ones will be on Periscope if you want to get refreshed.
But let us end with a second simultaneous sip in case you missed the first one because it's so good. So good. Raise your glass with me and join me now. That's all for now and let's enjoy the day.
but bumpin hey everybody it's time for coffee with Scott Adams in the simultaneous up why is this so important you ask yourself well let me explain have you ever noticed that when you were in the bad mood everything seems to go bad that day but if you're in a good mood it seems like everything goes well that day have you ever noticed that not every single thing but it seems like when you're in a good mood you have more good things happen when you're in a bad mood it looks like the universe is conspiring against you I know you've noticed that it's probably not a coincidence it could be because reality is subjective and you're actually creating reality as you go we don't know if that's true we don't know if you're creating reality we don't know if maybe it just seems that way but I can tell you one thing if you start your day in a good mood chances are the rest of your day is gonna be a lot better and one of the ways to do that is to join me for the simultaneous sip an unparalleled pleasure probably the best way to start the morning of all time all you need is a cup or a mug or glass a chalasis stein a tankard possibly a thermos maybe a flask fill it with you afraid of liquid I like coffee and joining me now for the simultaneous and if you haven't learned to do the AA part you should really get on that because it really makes a difference all right well I'm full of good news today I'm probably going to do more good news and bad news from now on I'm gonna become your source of dopamine that chemical that makes you feel good all day so the first thing we should know is that we're coming into the summer news cycle how what is different about these summer news cycle there's not much news so we're going to be entering the period where the news sort of fries there won't be necessarily I mean there could be but chances are there's not a lot happening over the summer last summer was so slow by August the news was so dead by August that the President of the United States invited me and to have a chat I'm not even making that up yeah you know last August the news was so slow you know Congress was off doing their summer vacations or whatever that literally the President of the United States said no it's calling back calling that Dilber guy and we'll chat for a little while now he was talking to a lot of people that summer I think he was just using the time to shore up his his base which was very smart but summer is coming and there isn't a lot of bad news for this president indeed the only news that sort of brewing looks like it's maybe more good news than bad news and so the Democrats are probably just having you know a cow right now so to say can you have a cow under that doesn't make sense I need to have a cow there's that like giving birth to a cow it makes no sense I think it's the same anyway they're gonna desperately need some bad news to give them something to talk about for the summer it doesn't look like it's going to be served up if you look at the Middle East peace plan that Jared is looking into there are two possibilities one nothing good will come of it which would be largely when everybody would expect so that's not really bad news that would be well we tried again nothing happened but there is something different about the Middle East right now that we've never seen before we have never seen a time in history when the Middle East was as well situated for peace some kind of a comprehensive peace in which the Palestinians and the Israelis and the and the Iranians at minimum may some kind of some kind of a deal and what I mean by that is that everybody is flexible in a way they had never been before so you have the most flexible group of countries more flexible than they've ever been for different reasons I'll talk about that at the same time you probably have the strongest leaders and the most I would say the most flexible leaders the people who have the most strength and flexibility at the same time which is really really something you don't want to lose I mean the fact that Jared Kushner is trying to make something happen I think he knows that their main name they may never be a better time here's why Saudi Arabia with all of the issues that we know about with to shogi and everything else has still maintained a good relationship with the United States at great political cost to president Trump he president Trump invested a lot of political capital in keeping Saudi Arabia in our friend circle even if maybe they haven't earned it that's of assets the president created an asset had a nothing this is what he does better than anything he creates something out of nothing because that's something that was Saudi Arabia really really needs to redeem itself in the Middle East redeem itself with the world what could be a better way what could be a better way than some kind of comprehensive peace plan meanwhile other big player the Iranians you know if Iran is forced into some kind of a deal that means that their proxies are also have pressure to make a deal so if you get around you probably make a lot of progress with all the proxies maybe with the Palestinians as well and it looks to me like Iran the way they're talking and the way they're acting is that they realize they're giving have to do something different to get a different result than what they have right now and what they have right now is a bad situation their economy is getting strangled in a way it's never been strangled before we've never had this level of economic pressure on them and to the point where it could bring down the regime in a year or two yes they don't do anything yes they don't make a big change they're probably gonna fail in a year or two so time is not on their side and that makes them flexible now they tried flexing their military muscle a little bit just to see if they could change the variables and president Trump quickly shut that down by sailing much of our naval assets into the area just to say maybe you should not do this and it looks like the Iranians decided maybe we shouldn't do this so I would say Iran is more flexible than they've ever been because there's more pressure than there's ever been and they're getting close to the total failure point Saudi Arabia's got money influence etc other countries in the region or have worked with us before they've got money they're probably getting flexible too and then you've got Israel Israel is coming from the point of strength right now and if Netanyahu continues being their leader he's got a great relationship with with the president and he's he's made at least peace gestures towards the people of Iran and he seems to be the right person the right set of skills the right you know badass personality to make a deal because it helps that you're a hardliner if you're trying to make peace cuz then the then the threat of war is still credible and everybody knows you're doing it from the right reasons it's not because in a week so I'm not going to go so far as to predict that there will be Middle East peace I think you'd have to be foolish to make that prediction after you know a zillion years of no peace but I will say unambiguously we've never had this set of variables where everybody's flexible at the same time for different reasons and we have really strong leaders in all those countries so even the Ayatollah no matter what you think about he's a strong leader and he can he could make something happen if he needs to then maybe he will not be the leader in a year so things could change all right so there's that then of course there's the whole situation with Bill Barra looking into the looking into the what was the origins of the Russia investigation certainly there will be no good news coming into that for Democrats we don't know what will come in it but it's not going to be good news for Democrats so they've got a tough tough summer coming up it's it looks like it's going to be a summer of unparalleled economic success may be something positive looking in the Middle East Kim jong-un remains remains friends with President Trump apparently and by the way people have joked about this but it's it's not really a joke when Kim jong-un started insulting John Bolton he was pacing most of the electorate in the United States it was one of those weird situations in which everybody came together but we didn't see it coming when Kim jong-un said that what did he call Bolton he called national security so North Korea's government called National Security Advisor John Bolton quote a war monger and quote a defective human product and most of the people in the United States saw that and they said yeah that's it's not too far off you know I'm not gonna I'm not gonna put up a canter to that argument at the moment he's John Bolton is somebody that largely the people on both the right and the left are pretty we're wary of him I will go oh even further and say if we did not have a president Trump to make sure that Bolton's instincts you know have some kind of a counter and it's it's a superior counter if we didn't have that I don't know if I would talk about anything else except getting rid of him like nothing would be more important to the well-being of the world and the country then removing John Bolton from office if if you didn't have a president Trump who I think is a reliable you know counter to Mia's impulses you put them together and they're actually a really strong team the this has been said many times but it has to be said again Bolton is the bad cop and he does create a useful asset that the president has skillfully used to say well you know it'd be good to be friends with me because I can make good things happen I can help your economy I can avoid war I can do everything you want I have everything you want and I'm willing to help you with it but if that doesn't work out have you met John Bolton because he's got some ideas that you might not like so much so they're a great team but when kid kim jongwan insults bolton most of the united states says well finally we're on the same page with this now bolton does have his supporters so i don't want to exaggerate that but it is humorous that the worst thing happening with North Korea right now think about it the worst thing happening with North Korea in the United States is the president president Trump is having fun with it you know he's joking about Joe Biden people in the United States are saying well if Kim jong-un is just insulting John Bolton Kim jong-un is he's not done yeah at least at least he thinks like we do on some things so that's pretty funny all right I talked about I did a special periscope yesterday have to do that you listed about Trump's Trump's hilarious tweet in which he said I was actually sticking up for sleepy Joe Biden while on foreign soil kim jeong-hoon called him a quote low IQ idiot and many other things whereas I related the court of Chairman Kim as a much softer quote low IQ individual who could possibly be upset with that now do you remember a couple years ago when people were saying it was popular for people to say I hope this behavior doesn't become normalized don't normalize this behavior this president cannot be normalized whatever you do don't normalize them and I look at this quote and I think aren't you glad this got normalized I mean seriously can you tell me you're not happy that this got normalized this is funny it's fun it doesn't hurt anybody it's just good clean fun and and the fact that President Trump brought it is by Kim jong-un and as part of the joke just makes it funnier and you know Kim Jordan probably saw this and said okay that's pretty funny don't you don't you think kim jagran saw this and said okay well there's two things we agree on Jon Bolton's kind of a wild card and Joe Biden's kind of a low Q individual so it's probably the healthiest maybe the healthiest sign you could ever say is that Trump and Kim Jong are sort of joking about Joe Biden there's no way that's bad you could try to turn that into something bad but it is not it is whatever the opposite of war if you were to make a continuum where you know there's good stuff on this side and all the way to it war on the on this side we're as far away from war as you can get when you're making jokes jokes are a good place to be all right there was a huge thing that happened recently that the news will not recognize as anything it will be completely it will never be news you'll never be a headline and might possibly be and I feel this strongly by the way one of the most important things happening in the world right now and I might be biased because some of you remember I guess a few years ago I had teased on social media that I had an idea that could change the world and I was willing to sell that idea I did as an experiment to see if anybody would fund a company based on an idea and I actually got a company to say yes and send me they sent me a contract and said yeah that idea is so good that we will actually give you a percentage of the company just for the idea and some internal changes happen at the company and they ended up not being able to complete the contract which was independent of whether it was a good idea so I had an idea that I thought would change the world a company was willing to fund it and and I didn't even have to do anything which was very unusual because that's not a normal situation people don't pay for ideas that just doesn't happen nobody pays for an idea unless it's such a good idea here's the idea Y Combinator which is probably the most prestigious startup incubator in the country maybe the world you announced that one of their companies raised monies it's called out schooler o UT schooler one word out of schooler they got investments and what they are they describe themselves as quote the Netflix of education online the Netflix of online education what that means is exactly the idea that I tried to sell unsuccessfully to this company and that idea is to have a marketplace where anybody can create a class just like Netflix is a marketplace where anybody can create a movie and if they make a good movie Netflix will consider putting that on their platform if you make a good TV show the Netflix will put it under plot and so they have done the thing that is somebody saying udemy does that on on making a stark difference between classes that a company puts on a platform versus a platform that lets anybody put content there if they meet certain requirements now I'm not an expert on the other companies doing that so there may be some other companies who are already in the business which would be all good news so the point is that the education field had never been subject to competitive to competition to free market competition if you have a platform the you own it you control who the instructors are etc that's not exactly a free market enough situation but if you have something that's really a Netflix for education then even I I mean literally me I could make a class so I can say to myself you know what you know what kids were 14 through 18 need to learn well they need to learn about maybe systems over goals maybe they need to learn about persuasion maybe they need to learn how to write I could make her class and that I could put it on there and if people like my class I could make money somebody's saying web IQ is this so I'm not going to necessarily say that yeah and and You.
Tube could do this as well but as the free market allows people to compete for online here's the big thing here's the big idea for all of this online training has the potential to be so inexpensive is effectively free we're very close to the point where online education will become good enough that people will prefer it over going in person we're not there yet right now going in person is still up here doing it online is still down here there are exceptions you know they're played you know so certainly there are bad bad in-person teachers and good online things that might be better but in general on average in person is still better than online but these free market classes will allow people to compete just like movies do and the quality of the online is just going to keep going up the quality of in-person education is not going to get much better it's sort of as good as it's going to be but online will keep getting better because these free market forces the moment it crosses over the only thing missing is the certifications the credibility the the the part where you say I got a degree and it means something that is almost certainly going to change in the next five to ten years maybe sooner and all it requires is people with enough credibility I always use Bill case as my example because he works for lots of examples if Bill Gates ever says publicly here's the deal if you take these specific classes online I will award you the the Gates Foundation Bachelors of Education or whatever it is whatever the classes the moment he does that people are gonna say well that's the thing that's the thing Bill Gates looked into it he's credible if he says this is a if he says this is a college degree that's college degree if Warren Buffett says if you take these classes online you have a degree in my opinion I will give you the Warren Buffett college degree certification that means something now not everybody could do that but people who have enough of a credibility could certainly do that could President Trump do that yes he could president Trump through the administration not him personally yeah let's let's not call it Trump University that I guess that's the problem so forget what I said about President Trump let's make it a government certification the government could say we're going to certify college degrees online as collections of classes if they meet certain criteria and the government could say here are the criteria and anybody who meets it can say I got the the government the four-year degree what that whatever that is all right somebody said America first university hmm maybe but but the larger point here is that you know when I say that I've left a birdie which I often say I say because I want all the things he wants except as you can see it is often the case that capitalism can get you it can deliver or what socialism promises so socialism promise use you free education but it doesn't have to get it capitalism doesn't promise you anything but it might give you free education in fact I will upgrade my might to it will at this point there's absolutely nothing good that will stop this from happening because the free market will give you increased quality of online education it will cross over in person education and it won't take long three years maybe I'd say three to five years and online education will be functionally completely superior to in-person but it may not have the credibility until people start blessing certain sets of classes but we're going to get there so we have so free education is going to happen free college is going to happen nothing could stop it birdie doesn't even have to do a darn thing he doesn't have to promise anything he doesn't have to he doesn't have to get out of bed in the morning birdie is gonna get free college he just has to wait that's three to five years all right so that's the other good news apparently Netflix is rethinking speaking of Netflix to Netflix related stories and you know one day the real Netflix is thinking about rethinking their thinking about rethinking their investment in Georgia yeah under the condition that these so-called hard hard to beat bills about abortion get past now they didn't say they pull out they said they did rethink their investment but what I predicted was that these states that make abortion impossible through whatever whatever legislation or other means those states will be so economically damaged that it will limit how many states are willing to do this so I do think some states will become no abortion states that seems likely but they will suffer economically because companies will decide not to go there and probably this is my other prediction from long ago it seems to me that apps will form sort of like the Go.
Fund.
Me apps in which somebody can finance travel to another state to get an abortion so if several southern states make abortion impossible or the clinics move away because it's too hard to operate there will be and the app I guarantee it I don't know who's gonna make it but I guarantee this will happen there will be an app this says I need an abortion and I'm in the wrong state what do I do and you're going to find all the resources for somebody to give you a ride you'll find somebody to stay with somebody to make sure that you're okay when you're you're in this other state and a ride back home they might even help you fund it it's possible all right so some apps will somebody somebody mentioned my startups app when hub and I wasn't thinking about that when I mentioned this but when hub allows you to talk to any expert about anything and one of those things you could do is connect to somebody who could solve this problem for you I'm not recommending it that's that's not what the app was made for but it's a general purpose happened which any expert can talk to any person for a fee or for free they don't have to have a fee all right let me let me talk about the Washington Post so somebody associated with the Washington Post one of their one of their central players recently tweeted that although President Trump is talking about Biden's 1994 crime bill and president Trump cleverly said that Democrats can't vote for somebody who was supportive that I love the way he put it he didn't say that's going to be a problem or that works against you whatever he actually said in direct language that that african-americans can't vote for somebody who was involved with that that crime bill now of course they can but let me well you put it in these let me frame it this way many of you remember that maybe a year ago or so I was having conversations with black lives matter leader Hawk Newsom and one of the things I was telling him is that as long as Democrats have all of the votes as long as they have all of the votes of the black population they don't have to deliver anything and I also said that if Republicans could deliver anything just anything for the black population that you would have developed a competitive situation for the first time now let me give incredible credit to Candice Owens Candice Owens and you know I think appointment you know more than a lot of other people there lots of people were involved with this but she seems to be that the most effective voice for letting people understand there's an option to vote Republican if they are so inclined so she's done the best job of making that that competitive situation and because the president was successful with prison reform he now has something specific to talk about this as look Democrats couldn't give me this I gave you this now there are a few some other things he can talk about with unemployment and such but they seem a little less direct unemployment seems like well that's something you did for white people just happened to be good for black people too you know if if you were inclined to think of things in racist ways it would be easy to imagine that that was an accomplishment it was just something that happened but the prison reform thing looks like a direct act it looks like something that was done that has a disproportionate benefit for the african-american community and nobody had to do it yeah I think he would agree the president Truong could have not done prison reform and his supporters probably wouldn't care one way or the other would you agree that's largely the case it wasn't something he did for the base it was something he did for the country because it made sense and because he could that was it it made sense and he could he could do it so he did it exactly what you would like to see any of your government it made sense so they did it but that is created now a competitive situation for the first time it is obvious to the african-american community and I think really for the first time it's obvious that they can they can completely control this election that's a big statement but let me say it again because it's true the black community african-americans in this unite in the United States citizens they will determine or at least they could determine it's up to them who the next president is that's not a too strong statement is it because you know it's gonna be closest no matter what you know that if enough for if enough of the black vote goes Republican to maintain this competitive situation where the Republic where the Democrats really have to offer something they haven't offered anything Republicans have let's get some competition let's see the Democrats offer something that's so good that even the Republicans have to agree let's see the Republicans offer something that's so good that even the Democrats have to agree so congratulations Candice owens larry elder all the folks have worked with the president who have tried to create this exact situation this situation is as perfectly crafted as you ever would want it to be you want people to yeah and Kanye Kanye and yes so Kanye and Kim Kardashian you have to give them Kim Kardashian West you have to give them all all kinds of credit because they created a competitive situation now I don't think that every black person should vote Republican by any means what I think is that they should they should vote for whoever is going to help them the most in their opinion whatever wherever that takes them but think about this situation however how many years ago was it when slavery was the law of the land or at least popular in the south how many years ago was that a few hundred years ago and here we are in 2019 we're coming off you know we came off eight years of a african-american president and 160 people are giving me different different numbers so a while ago both correct me if I'm wrong the the black voters of this country are going to decide the next present is that wrong is it wrong to say that the black voters actually have control of the country right now if they want it if they don't want it they don't have it and you know certainly when black voters decided hey this Barack Obama guy looks kind of good what we'd like to have a president who looks like us did they not decide who was the president could you not say conclusively that Barack Obama was elected because black the citizens wanted him to be elected and of course other people did too but I think that was the deciding part and likewise with this upcoming election if black voters decided that they just couldn't vote for Chompy you would have a lot of trouble getting reelected if they decide that some of them want to vote for him he'll probably get elected so I would say it's kind of down to the black vote and they've created this perfect competitive situation and I hate to be the one who's got all the good news but this is the golden age this is the point where the black population figured out how to guess stuff now one of the things that hog Newsom said that I can never get out of my mind it's just it's just so smart in terms of how to frame things he said that if this country does something that's good for the black community it always helps the country and when you first hear that you think well that can't be that can't be true in every case right but it's hard to find an exception if you do things that are good for the black population in this country you you do end up doing things that are good for everybody you know unless you limit it somehow by race which we would not do all right so let's get to the fun part I made you wait I wanted to tell you because people have been asking me if social media is going to put their finger on the scale and social media is powerful enough that they can essentially decide who will get elected president you know they would even have more power than african-americans because everybody is subject to the same persuasion right so the social media could persuade black voters one way or the other and they would have a lot of influence over that but what can you do about that so I want to talk about that so don't leave because I'm going to tell you what to do if you're worried that social media is going to determine the election you might like this and you might not here's my suggestion for all of you this is what you can do not the government not talking about what Trump does or it's this administration and tell you what tell you what you can do all right here's what you can do don't get kicked off of social media that's number one don't get kicked off of social media you know what you're doing when you're doing something edgy you know when you've gone too far you know when you're pushing the boundaries don't there's no there's no law that says you have to push the boundary think about any tweet that God could anybody kicked off a social media think about it any tweet that ever got somebody kicked off of social media or even put in jail on social media was that tweet important to the person's life never never the the the tweets that get people kicked off of social media are never important they're never important they're just something that was over a line so you gotta kick it off so don't do that if you get temporarily kicked off because you've got a bad tweet or a bad post and all you have to do is remove it remove it remove it right away don't take your own power away all right next grow your followers figure out how to grow your following because then you'll have more voice the more people who follow you more the more influence you have so do what you can to learn how to grow your your user base and how to participate effectively you should follow each other to boost your signal if you're following a number of voices on the right and you would like even more people on the right to have more power follow some extra people figure out who you think is influential and then boost their signals by by yeah let's get rid of this guy alright and then next learn persuasion if you haven't read in my book win Bakley you should do it because social media can have a big influence in terms of decisions they make about what you see but you can also have you can also have the big influence by simply learning how to be more persuasive so read my book win big Lea followed my periscopes and try out some of the techniques be visual don't be obscene because the her stuff gets gets more virality over the next year I will teach you more tips about how to be persuasive and that will helps but here's the big one so this is the one to remember I'm gonna be modeling this going forward on social media when Trump was first running for for election it felt like those who were supporting him were pirates it was like he was the head pirate and he had a band of pirates doing things that were edgy and dangerous and sometimes could get you kicked off of social media things that were maybe on the the border of ethical behavior some of it well beyond that it was a pirate situation and then he won is it appropriate to take your pirate mentality to reelection when this president is successful on all the you know the normal ways that you want success it's not so here's the suggestion become nice it's really powerful if people will support the president simply block everybody who makes a personal comment and never sees that person again you can live first of all a life of far less stress but you will also take it to a higher level you can be a level of maturity that will be hard to fight against it's time to to raise your game it's time to bring your the way you talk about things it's it's it's time to take your your persona align your maturity it's time to take it up a level and recognize that you won you won you got your president right for those of you who are Trump supporters you want act like a winner you don't need to act like a pirate anymore you don't need to argue with their regional I'm watching online as there's there's one particular troll who's been bothering all the people in my timeline because they keep doing this loop where you prove them wrong and then they go back to the original point that you proved wrong before yeah her name is her name is Emily I blocked her but I didn't block all the people who were still interacting with her so I keep seeing their end of it please block her I mean if any of you who are dealing with this Emily troll she's not a real citizen having a real conversation she's not she is a troll she's in it for whatever whatever reaction she's getting don't give it to her so from now on I'm going to completely reverse my pattern online I used to take a personal insult and then insult them back and I'd be it was fun you know mostly it was fun I did it to practice I did it because people would laugh at my replies etc but I'm going to stop doing that as of today I'm going to start giving people no second chance so if somebody comes in with their stupid laundry list oh but your president is a big old racist and here's the 10 things that I hallucinate he did block because that person is not a real voice that person is a person who's got who's got an act they came to bother you and they came to boost their own signal because if you interact with the trolls you're given them more visibility and you're you're making their day you're giving them exactly what they want don't give them what they want just shut them down you can you can completely shut down you can completely shut down the the effectiveness of the other side by blocking them on the first offense so from now on first offense if it's personal so here are the rules I don't block anybody for disagreeing with what I said I don't block anybody for saying oh here's a link you didn't consider this disagreement completely completely acceptable and if I ever if I ever violate that line I know that you'll keep me honest all right but the monitors personal don't wait for the second thing don't answer and don't wait for a second insult removal just like that now the other people I remove are the people who they try to read my mind in public so there are quite a few people who will tweet and they'll include me ins tweets and they'll say something like well Scott will block you for having a people like to say this Scott will block you for proving him wrong online okay if you say that I will block you because I don't do that so anybody who tries to read my mind and say in public what they think I'm thinking you're always wrong so I'm gonna block you instantly because somebody like that doesn't ever go away if you interact with them if you let them go they'll just keep saying more of this stuff so get rid of it all right now at the same time if you are successfully acting nice online eventually that's going to become a story because social media is doing something for you that looks terrible but might not work out as terrible as you think what what the social media platforms are doing are ahead of the 2020 election and maybe just because it's ordinary business they're getting rid of the most provocative voices on social media they are doing both sides alright you could argue that it's not equal and and you know I'm sure that's his argument worth having but the Krassin Stein's have been banned who was it who was the other guy who got banned recently anyway the point is there are bands on both sides I wouldn't worry too much about the fact that there are more conservatives being banned because if the people being banned farik obvious so fair account got banned so what's happening is the the voices on the right that are the ones that would ruin your reputation are being knocked off the system now woods is a special case because he's not really banned all he has to do is get rid of one tweet that has no importance don't don't put Jameson woods into the category of real people who say things and get banned is a different situation he could be back the moment he gets rid of one tweet there's knowing no importance so that's a choice and likewise if you're if you find yourself in the James Woods situation where he in his opinion since the thing he got banned for was a famous quote and it was not really a call to violence he's he's resting on principle apparently I don't want to read his mind but it looks like he's making a principled stand that free speech is free speech and it doesn't matter there's somebody else reinterpreted it wrong that's not the point so I understand that point I accept it it's credible it's you know it's real but if you want to be effective I don't think that's working so it's a principled stand that I'll think works do you know what would work staying on social media and say things that are healthy and good and persuasive that would help did what did you what did James Woods do for you alright when he's online he's a powerful voice that as a you know we hope a productive outcome when he allows himself to be banned over a tweet that has no importance to anybody in the world is he helping you he's not he's not helping you he's not he's not changing anything he's not helping himself he's just got a little vacation from social media so don't be don't be James Woods you know I I say again I'll respect a principled stand and he seems to be taking that so I do respect that I'm just saying that it doesn't help anything does it's not effective it's not effective at all all right so be nice on social media block the trolls immediately do not interact with them don't let them put words in your your mouth so the other people I've I will delete is if I get into a conversation online and they say something along the lines of you know you keep saying this and this is why you're wrong say yes they put words in my mouth you can't fix that the people who say but what you're really thinking you can't fix that all right here's a little lesson on persuasion that I'd like to try it out because you might need to use this one I started on this point and I'm circling back to it so the Washington Post I guess there might have been there Washington bureau chief doesn't matter how it was he tweeted that the president is going to have problems criticizing Biden for his 1994 crime bill because the president quote has his own problems with the the Central Park five situation which was also a long time ago now here's the thing the Central Park five thing President Trump did a full-page ad in which he was complaining about Prague and said maybe we should have the death penalty for these horrible crimes he did not mention race although there was obviously the context was that the five african-american gentleman who had been arrested and later were acquitted were released I forget what but that they were they were found not guilty he believed they were guilty but their race was never part of the conversation Trump Trump never mentioned race he mentioned crime we have seen quite clearly that he talks about crime is crime and when it came to for example the the prison reform bill President Trump did not say oh we can't do that because it's good for black people you know you went ahead and did it because it's good for people so when the Washington Post said he's got this problem because of this Central Park five situation decades ago here's the right response and it's the one that I gave I said that the Washington Post has equated crime and black people and they need to explain that cuz that's what happened I'm not making that up President talked about cried that's it he talked about crime and the death penalty if other people say that's about race you can't make that argument unless you are introducing into the conversation that crime and black people are equated that is racist criticizing the president for making a stand about crime without mentioning race and then going in and saying hey this is some kind of racist anti black people the only way you can make that criticism is if you yourself are a racist who has decided that crime and black people are somehow paired the president didn't do that he never did that he never has done that and I'm pretty sure he'd never will because there's no evidence that he thinks that way he does hate crime that is as clear as possible there's no doubt anyplace mind that he's anti-crime like seriously seriously anti-crime and he's can still do a crime doll because it made sense and it was good for the country somebody's saying I don't agree with you in all issues talking to me but this point is the reason I follow you thank you so if you're in the situation and I know you will be between now and 2020 somebody's going to bring up the Central Park five you've a response to it should be Trump never mentioned race at Bessette that's all you should say about Trump the rest of what you should say is about the fricking jerk who is trying to equate black people and crime which bothers me honestly like I'm not saying this as some clever little thing you know persuasion wise it is persuasion and I am teach you got to do that but it frickin bothers me it bothers me that the racists are accusing somebody who has an active that way of being a racist it's like extra bothering that there's some form of projection going on there ain't using that word projection because I'm not us like psychologist so I withdraw that word I actually mocked that word in my upcoming book all right that's all I got today so so I hope this little little dose of dopamine was good I'm going to keep working on the dopamine angle for these periscopes and by the way if you did not know these periscopes get downloaded in an hour so they will be available on youtube to find them you would just search for the phrase real coffee with scott adams remember the real part real coffee with scallops and then you can have them the You.
Tube experience if you prefer that the live ones will will be on periscope if you want to get refresh but let us end with a second simultaneous sip in case you missed the first one because it's so good so good razor drug with me and join me now that's all for now and let's enjoy the day
[Music]
but bumpin hey everybody it's time for
coffee with Scott Adams in the
simultaneous up why is this so important
you ask yourself well let me explain
have you ever noticed that when you were
in the bad mood everything seems to go
bad that day but if you're in a good
mood it seems like everything goes well
that day have you ever noticed that not
every single thing but it seems like
when you're in a good mood you have more
good things happen when you're in a bad
mood it looks like the universe is
conspiring against you I know you've
noticed that it's probably not a
coincidence it could be because reality
is subjective and you're actually
creating reality as you go we don't know
if that's true we don't know if you're
creating reality we don't know if maybe
it just seems that way but I can tell
you one thing if you start your day in a
good mood
chances are the rest of your day is
gonna be a lot better and one of the
ways to do that is to join me for the
simultaneous sip an unparalleled
pleasure probably the best way to start
the morning of all time all you need is
a cup or a mug or glass a chalasis stein
a tankard possibly a thermos maybe a
flask fill it with you afraid of liquid
I like coffee and joining me now for the
simultaneous and if you haven't learned
to do the AA part you should really get
on that because it really makes a
difference all right well I'm full of
good news today I'm probably going to do
more good news and bad news from now on
I'm gonna become your source of dopamine
that chemical that makes you feel good
all day so the first thing we should
know is that we're coming into the
summer news cycle how what is different
about these summer news cycle there's
not much news so we're going to be
entering the period where the news sort
of fries
there won't be necessarily I mean there
could be but chances are there's not a
lot happening over the summer last
summer was so slow by August the news
was so dead by August that the President
of the United States invited me and to
have a chat I'm not even making that up
yeah you know last August the news was
so slow you know Congress was off doing
their summer vacations or whatever that
literally the President of the United
States said no it's calling back calling
that Dilber guy and we'll chat for a
little while now he was talking to a lot
of people that summer I think he was
just using the time to shore up his his
base which was very smart but summer is
coming and there isn't a lot of bad news
for this president indeed the only news
that sort of brewing looks like it's
maybe more good news than bad news and
so the Democrats are probably just
having you know a cow right now so to
say can you have a cow under that
doesn't make sense I need to have a cow
there's that like giving birth to a cow
it makes no sense I think it's the same
anyway they're gonna desperately need
some bad news to give them something to
talk about for the summer it doesn't
look like it's going to be served up if
you look at the Middle East peace plan
that Jared is looking into there are two
possibilities one nothing good will come
of it which would be largely when
everybody would expect so that's not
really bad news that would be well we
tried again nothing happened but there
is something different about the Middle
East right now that we've never seen
before we have never seen a time in
history when the Middle East was as well
situated for peace some kind of a
comprehensive peace in which the
Palestinians and the Israelis and the
and the Iranians at minimum may
some kind of some kind of a deal and
what I mean by that is that everybody is
flexible in a way they had never been
before so you have the most flexible
group of countries more flexible than
they've ever been for different reasons
I'll talk about that at the same time
you probably have the strongest leaders
and the most I would say the most
flexible leaders the people who have the
most strength and flexibility at the
same time which is really really
something you don't want to lose I mean
the fact that Jared Kushner is trying to
make something happen I think he knows
that their main name they may never be a
better time here's why Saudi Arabia with
all of the issues that we know about
with to shogi and everything else has
still maintained a good relationship
with the United States at great
political cost to president Trump he
president Trump invested a lot of
political capital in keeping Saudi
Arabia in our friend circle even if
maybe they haven't earned it that's of
assets the president created an asset
had a nothing this is what he does
better than anything he creates
something out of nothing because that's
something that was Saudi Arabia really
really needs to redeem itself in the
Middle East redeem itself with the world
what could be a better way what could be
a better way than some kind of
comprehensive peace plan meanwhile other
big player the Iranians you know if Iran
is forced into some kind of a deal that
means that their proxies are also have
pressure to make a deal so if you get
around you probably make a lot of
progress with all the proxies maybe with
the Palestinians as well and it looks to
me like Iran the way they're talking and
the way they're acting is that they
realize they're giving
have to do something different to get a
different result than what they have
right now and what they have right now
is a bad situation their economy is
getting strangled in a way it's never
been strangled before we've never had
this level of economic pressure on them
and to the point where it could bring
down the regime in a year or two yes
they don't do anything yes they don't
make a big change they're probably gonna
fail in a year or two so time is not on
their side and that makes them flexible
now they tried flexing their military
muscle a little bit just to see if they
could change the variables and president
Trump quickly shut that down by sailing
much of our naval assets into the area
just to say maybe you should not do this
and it looks like the Iranians decided
maybe we shouldn't do this so I would
say Iran is more flexible than they've
ever been because there's more pressure
than there's ever been and they're
getting close to the total failure point
Saudi Arabia's got money influence etc
other countries in the region or have
worked with us before they've got money
they're probably getting flexible too
and then you've got Israel Israel is
coming from the point of strength right
now and if Netanyahu continues being
their leader he's got a great
relationship with with the president and
he's he's made at least peace gestures
towards the people of Iran and he seems
to be the right person the right set of
skills the right you know badass
personality to make a deal because it
helps that you're a hardliner if you're
trying to make peace cuz then the then
the threat of war is still credible and
everybody knows you're doing it from the
right reasons it's not because in a week
so I'm not going to go so far as to
predict that there will be Middle East
peace I think you'd have to be foolish
to make that prediction after you know a
zillion years of no peace
but I will say unambiguously we've never
had this set of variables
where everybody's flexible at the same
time for different reasons and we have
really strong leaders in all those
countries so even the Ayatollah no
matter what you think about he's a
strong leader and he can he could make
something happen if he needs to then
maybe he will not be the leader in a
year so things could change all right so
there's that then of course there's the
whole situation with Bill Barra looking
into the looking into the what was the
origins of the Russia investigation
certainly there will be no good news
coming into that for Democrats we don't
know what will come in it but it's not
going to be good news for Democrats so
they've got a tough tough summer coming
up it's it looks like it's going to be a
summer of unparalleled economic success
may be something positive looking in the
Middle East Kim jong-un remains remains
friends with President Trump apparently
and by the way people have joked about
this but it's it's not really a joke
when Kim jong-un started insulting John
Bolton he was pacing most of the
electorate in the United States it was
one of those weird situations in which
everybody came together but we didn't
see it coming when Kim jong-un said that
what did he call Bolton he called
national security so North Korea's
government called National Security
Advisor John Bolton quote a war monger
and quote a defective human product and
most of the people in the United States
saw that and they said yeah that's it's
not too far off you know I'm not gonna
I'm not gonna put up a canter to that
argument at the moment he's John Bolton
is somebody that largely the people on
both the right and the left are pretty
we're wary of him I will go oh
even further and say if we did not have
a president Trump to make sure that
Bolton's instincts you know have some
kind of a counter and it's it's a
superior counter if we didn't have that
I don't know if I would talk about
anything else except getting rid of him
like nothing would be more important to
the well-being of the world and the
country then removing John Bolton from
office if if you didn't have a president
Trump who I think is a reliable you know
counter to Mia's impulses you put them
together and they're actually a really
strong team the this has been said many
times but it has to be said again Bolton
is the bad cop and he does create a
useful asset that the president has
skillfully used to say well you know
it'd be good to be friends with me
because I can make good things happen I
can help your economy I can avoid war I
can do everything you want I have
everything you want and I'm willing to
help you with it but if that doesn't
work out
have you met John Bolton because he's
got some ideas that you might not like
so much so they're a great team but when
kid kim jongwan insults bolton most of
the united states says well finally
we're on the same page with this now
bolton does have his supporters so i
don't want to exaggerate that but it is
humorous that the worst thing happening
with North Korea right now think about
it the worst thing happening with North
Korea in the United States is the
president president Trump is having fun
with it you know he's joking about Joe
Biden people in the United States are
saying well if Kim jong-un is just
insulting John Bolton Kim jong-un is
he's not done yeah at least at least he
thinks like we do on some things so
that's pretty funny all right I talked
about I did a special periscope
yesterday have to do that you listed
about Trump's Trump's hilarious tweet in
which he said I was actually sticking up
for sleepy Joe Biden while on foreign
soil
kim jeong-hoon called him a quote low IQ
idiot and many other things
whereas I related the court of Chairman
Kim as a much softer quote low IQ
individual who could possibly be upset
with that now do you remember a couple
years ago when people were saying it was
popular for people to say I hope this
behavior doesn't become normalized don't
normalize this behavior this president
cannot be normalized whatever you do
don't normalize them and I look at this
quote and I think aren't you glad this
got normalized I mean seriously
can you tell me you're not happy that
this got normalized this is funny it's
fun it doesn't hurt anybody it's just
good clean fun and and the fact that
President Trump brought it is by Kim
jong-un and as part of the joke just
makes it funnier and you know Kim Jordan
probably saw this and said okay that's
pretty funny don't you don't you think
kim jagran saw this and said okay well
there's two things we agree on Jon
Bolton's kind of a wild card and Joe
Biden's kind of a low Q individual so
it's probably the healthiest maybe the
healthiest sign you could ever say is
that Trump and Kim Jong are sort of
joking about Joe Biden there's no way
that's bad you could try to turn that
into something bad but it is not it is
whatever the opposite of war if you were
to make a continuum where you know
there's good stuff on this side and all
the way to it war on the on this side
we're as far away from war as you can
get when you're making jokes jokes are a
good place to be all right there was a
huge thing that happened recently that
the news will not recognize as anything
it will be completely it will never be
news you'll never be a headline
and might possibly be and I feel this
strongly by the way one of the most
important things happening in the world
right now and I might be biased because
some of you remember I guess a few years
ago I had teased on social media that I
had an idea
that could change the world and I was
willing to sell that idea I did as an
experiment to see if anybody would fund
a company based on an idea and I
actually got a company to say yes and
send me they sent me a contract and said
yeah that idea is so good
that we will actually give you a
percentage of the company just for the
idea and some internal changes happen at
the company and they ended up not being
able to complete the contract which was
independent of whether it was a good
idea so I had an idea that I thought
would change the world
a company was willing to fund it and and
I didn't even have to do anything which
was very unusual because that's not a
normal situation people don't pay for
ideas that just doesn't happen nobody
pays for an idea unless it's such a good
idea here's the idea Y Combinator which
is probably the most prestigious startup
incubator in the country maybe the world
you announced that one of their
companies raised monies it's called out
schooler o UT schooler one word out of
schooler they got investments and what
they are they describe themselves as
quote the Netflix of education online
the Netflix of online education what
that means is exactly the idea that I
tried to sell unsuccessfully to this
company and that idea is to have a
marketplace where anybody can create a
class just like Netflix is a marketplace
where anybody can create a movie and if
they make a good movie Netflix will
consider putting that on their platform
if you make a good TV show the Netflix
will put it under plot
and so they have done the thing that is
somebody saying udemy does that on on
making a stark difference between
classes that a company puts on a
platform versus a platform that lets
anybody put content there if they meet
certain requirements now I'm not an
expert on the other companies doing that
so there may be some other companies who
are already in the business which would
be all good news so the point is that
the education field had never been
subject to competitive to competition to
free market competition if you have a
platform the you own it you control who
the instructors are etc that's not
exactly a free market enough situation
but if you have something that's really
a Netflix for education then even I I
mean literally me I could make a class
so I can say to myself you know what you
know what kids were 14 through 18 need
to learn well they need to learn about
maybe systems over goals maybe they need
to learn about persuasion maybe they
need to learn how to write I could make
her class and that I could put it on
there and if people like my class I
could make money somebody's saying web
IQ is this so I'm not going to
necessarily say that yeah and and
YouTube could do this as well but as the
free market allows people to compete for
online here's the big thing here's the
big idea for all of this online training
has the potential to be so inexpensive
is effectively free we're very close to
the point where online education will
become good enough that people will
prefer it over going in person we're not
there yet right now going in person is
still up here doing it online is still
down here there are exceptions you know
they're played you know so certainly
there are bad bad in-person teachers and
good online things that might be better
but in general on average in person is
still better than online but these free
market
classes will allow people to compete
just like movies do and the quality of
the online is just going to keep going
up the quality of in-person education is
not going to get much better it's sort
of as good as it's going to be but
online will keep getting better because
these free market forces the moment it
crosses over the only thing missing is
the certifications the credibility the
the the part where you say I got a
degree and it means something that is
almost certainly going to change in the
next five to ten years maybe sooner and
all it requires is people with enough
credibility I always use Bill case as my
example because he works for lots of
examples if Bill Gates ever says
publicly here's the deal if you take
these specific classes online I will
award you the the Gates Foundation
[Music]
Bachelors of Education or whatever it is
whatever the classes the moment he does
that people are gonna say well that's
the thing that's the thing
Bill Gates looked into it he's credible
if he says this is a if he says this is
a college degree
that's college degree if Warren Buffett
says if you take these classes online
you have a degree in my opinion I will
give you the Warren Buffett college
degree certification that means
something now not everybody could do
that but people who have enough of a
credibility could certainly do that
could President Trump do that yes he
could
president Trump through the
administration not him personally yeah
let's let's not call it Trump University
that I guess that's the problem so
forget what I said about President Trump
let's make it a government certification
the government could say we're going to
certify college degrees online as
collections of classes
if they meet certain criteria and the
government could say here are the
criteria and anybody who meets it can
say I got the the government the
four-year degree what that whatever that
is all right somebody said America first
university hmm maybe but but the larger
point here is that you know when I say
that I've left a birdie which I often
say I say because I want all the things
he wants except as you can see it is
often the case that capitalism can get
you it can deliver or what socialism
promises so socialism promise use you
free education but it doesn't have to
get it capitalism doesn't promise you
anything but it might give you free
education in fact I will upgrade my
might to it will at this point there's
absolutely nothing good that will stop
this from happening because the free
market will give you increased quality
of online education it will cross over
in person education and it won't take
long three years maybe I'd say three to
five years and online education will be
functionally completely superior to
in-person but it may not have the
credibility until people start blessing
certain sets of classes but we're going
to get there so we have so free
education is going to happen free
college is going to happen nothing could
stop it birdie doesn't even have to do a
darn thing
he doesn't have to promise anything he
doesn't have to he doesn't have to get
out of bed in the morning birdie is
gonna get free college he just has to
wait that's three to five years all
right so that's the other good news
apparently Netflix is rethinking
speaking of Netflix to Netflix related
stories and you know one day the real
Netflix is thinking about rethinking
their thinking about rethinking their
investment in Georgia yeah under the
condition that these so-called hard
hard to beat bills about abortion get
past now they didn't say they pull out
they said they did rethink their
investment but what I predicted was that
these states that make abortion
impossible through whatever whatever
legislation or other means those states
will be so economically damaged that it
will limit how many states are willing
to do this so I do think some states
will become no abortion states that
seems likely but they will suffer
economically because companies will
decide not to go there and probably this
is my other prediction from long ago it
seems to me that apps will form sort of
like the GoFundMe apps in which somebody
can finance travel to another state to
get an abortion
so if several southern states make
abortion impossible or the clinics move
away because it's too hard to operate
there will be and the app I guarantee it
I don't know who's gonna make it but I
guarantee this will happen there will be
an app this says I need an abortion and
I'm in the wrong state what do I do and
you're going to find all the resources
for somebody to give you a ride you'll
find somebody to stay with somebody to
make sure that you're okay when you're
you're in this other state and a ride
back home they might even help you fund
it it's possible all right so some apps
will somebody somebody mentioned my
startups app when hub and I wasn't
thinking about that
when I mentioned this but when hub
allows you to talk to any expert about
anything
and one of those things you could do is
connect to somebody who could solve this
problem for you I'm not recommending it
that's that's not what the app was made
for but it's a general purpose happened
which any expert can talk to any person
for a fee or for free they don't have to
have a fee all right let me
let me talk about the Washington Post so
somebody associated with the Washington
Post one of their one of their central
players recently tweeted that although
President Trump is talking about Biden's
1994 crime bill and president Trump
cleverly said that Democrats can't vote
for somebody who was supportive that I
love the way he put it he didn't say
that's going to be a problem or that
works against you whatever he actually
said in direct language that that
african-americans can't vote for
somebody who was involved with that that
crime bill now of course they can but
let me well you put it in these let me
frame it this way many of you remember
that maybe a year ago or so I was having
conversations with black lives matter
leader Hawk Newsom and one of the things
I was telling him is that as long as
Democrats have all of the votes as long
as they have all of the votes of the
black population they don't have to
deliver anything and I also said that if
Republicans could deliver anything just
anything for the black population that
you would have developed a competitive
situation for the first time now let me
give incredible credit to Candice Owens
Candice Owens and you know I think
appointment you know more than a lot of
other people there lots of people were
involved with this but she seems to be
that the most effective voice for
letting people understand there's an
option to vote Republican if they are so
inclined so she's done the best job of
making that that competitive situation
and because the president was successful
with prison reform
he now has something specific to talk
about this as look Democrats couldn't
give me this I gave you this now there
are a few some other things he can talk
about
with unemployment and such but they seem
a little less direct unemployment seems
like well that's something you did for
white people just happened to be good
for black people too you know if if you
were inclined to think of things in
racist ways it would be easy to imagine
that that was an accomplishment it was
just something that happened but the
prison reform thing looks like a direct
act it looks like something that was
done that has a disproportionate benefit
for the african-american community and
nobody had to do it yeah I think he
would agree the president Truong could
have not done prison reform and his
supporters probably wouldn't care one
way or the other
would you agree that's largely the case
it wasn't something he did for the base
it was something he did for the country
because it made sense and because he
could that was it it made sense and he
could he could do it so he did it
exactly what you would like to see any
of your government it made sense so they
did it but that is created now a
competitive situation for the first time
it is obvious to the african-american
community and I think really for the
first time it's obvious that they can
they can completely control this
election that's a big statement but let
me say it again because it's true the
black community african-americans in
this unite in the United States citizens
they will determine or at least they
could determine it's up to them who the
next president is that's not a too
strong statement is it because you know
it's gonna be closest no matter what you
know that if enough for if enough of the
black vote goes Republican to maintain
this competitive situation where the
Republic where the Democrats really have
to offer something they haven't offered
anything Republicans have let's get some
competition let's see the Democrats
offer something that's so good that even
the Republicans have to agree let's see
the Republicans offer something that's
so good that even the Democrats have to
agree so congratulations
Candice owens larry elder all the folks
have worked with the president who have
tried to create this exact situation
this situation is as perfectly crafted
as you ever would want it to be you want
people to yeah and Kanye Kanye and yes
so Kanye and Kim Kardashian you have to
give them Kim Kardashian West you have
to give them all all kinds of credit
because they created a competitive
situation now I don't think that every
black person should vote Republican by
any means what I think is that they
should they should vote for whoever is
going to help them the most in their
opinion whatever wherever that takes
them but think about this situation
however how many years ago was it when
slavery was the law of the land or at
least popular in the south how many
years ago was that a few hundred years
ago and here we are in 2019 we're coming
off you know we came off eight years of
a african-american president and 160
people are giving me different different
numbers so a while ago both correct me
if I'm wrong the the black voters of
this country are going to decide the
next present is that wrong
is it wrong to say that the black voters
actually have control of the country
right now if they want it if they don't
want it they don't have it and you know
certainly when black voters decided hey
this Barack Obama guy looks kind of good
what we'd like to have a president who
looks like us did they not decide who
was the president could you not say
conclusively that Barack Obama was
elected because black the citizens
wanted him to be elected and of course
other people did too but I think that
was the deciding part and likewise with
this upcoming election
if black voters decided that they just
couldn't vote for Chompy you would have
a lot of trouble getting reelected if
they decide that some of them
want to vote for him he'll probably get
elected so I would say it's kind of down
to the black vote and they've created
this perfect competitive situation and I
hate to be the one who's got all the
good news but this is the golden age
this is the point where the black
population figured out how to guess
stuff now one of the things that hog
Newsom said that I can never get out of
my mind it's just it's just so smart in
terms of how to frame things he said
that if this country does something
that's good for the black community it
always helps the country and when you
first hear that you think well that
can't be that can't be true in every
case right but it's hard to find an
exception if you do things that are good
for the black population in this country
you you do end up doing things that are
good for everybody you know unless you
limit it somehow by race which we would
not do all right
so let's get to the fun part I made you
wait I wanted to tell you because people
have been asking me if social media is
going to put their finger on the scale
and social media is powerful enough that
they can essentially decide who will get
elected president you know they would
even have more power than
african-americans because everybody is
subject to the same persuasion right so
the social media could persuade black
voters one way or the other and they
would have a lot of influence over that
but what can you do about that so I want
to talk about that so don't leave
because I'm going to tell you what to do
if you're worried that social media is
going to determine the election you
might like this and you might not here's
my suggestion for all of you this is
what you can do not the government not
talking about what Trump does or it's
this administration and tell you what
tell you what you can do all right
here's what you can do don't get kicked
off of social media that's number one
don't get kicked off of social media you
know what you're doing when you're doing
something edgy you know when you've gone
too far you know when you're pushing the
boundaries don't
there's no there's no law that says you
have to push the boundary think about
any tweet that God could anybody kicked
off a social media think about it any
tweet that ever got somebody kicked off
of social media or even put in jail on
social media was that tweet important to
the person's life
never never the the the tweets that get
people kicked off of social media are
never important they're never important
they're just something that was over a
line so you gotta kick it off so don't
do that if you get temporarily kicked
off because you've got a bad tweet or a
bad post and all you have to do is
remove it remove it remove it right away
don't take your own power away all right
next grow your followers figure out how
to grow your following because then
you'll have more voice the more people
who follow you more the more influence
you have so do what you can to learn how
to grow your your user base and how to
participate effectively you should
follow each other to boost your signal
if you're following a number of voices
on the right and you would like even
more people on the right to have more
power follow some extra people figure
out who you think is influential and
then boost their signals by by yeah
let's get rid of this guy alright
and then next learn persuasion if you
haven't read in my book win Bakley you
should do it because social media can
have a big influence in terms of
decisions they make about what you see
but you can also have you can also have
the big influence by simply learning how
to be more persuasive so read my book
win big Lea followed my periscopes and
try out some of the techniques be visual
don't be obscene because the
her stuff gets gets more virality over
the next year I will teach you more tips
about how to be persuasive and that will
helps but here's the big one so this is
the one to remember I'm gonna be
modeling this going forward on social
media when Trump was first running for
for election it felt like those who were
supporting him were pirates it was like
he was the head pirate and he had a band
of pirates doing things that were edgy
and dangerous and sometimes could get
you kicked off of social media things
that were maybe on the the border of
ethical behavior some of it well beyond
that it was a pirate situation and then
he won is it appropriate to take your
pirate mentality to reelection when this
president is successful on all the you
know the normal ways that you want
success it's not so here's the
suggestion become nice it's really
powerful if people will support the
president simply block everybody who
makes a personal comment and never sees
that person again you can live first of
all a life of far less stress but you
will also take it to a higher level you
can be a level of maturity that will be
hard to fight against it's time to to
raise your game it's time to bring your
the way you talk about things it's it's
it's time to take your your persona
align your maturity it's time to take it
up a level and recognize that you won
you won you got your president right for
those of you who are Trump supporters
you want act like a winner you don't
need to act like a pirate anymore you
don't need to argue with their regional
I'm watching online as there's there's
one particular troll who's been
bothering all the people in my timeline
because they keep doing this loop where
you prove them wrong and then they go
back
to the original point that you proved
wrong before yeah her name is her name
is Emily I blocked her but I didn't
block all the people who were still
interacting with her so I keep seeing
their end of it
please block her I mean if any of you
who are dealing with this Emily troll
she's not a real citizen having a real
conversation she's not she is a troll
she's in it for whatever whatever
reaction she's getting don't give it to
her so from now on I'm going to
completely reverse my pattern online I
used to take a personal insult
and then insult them back and I'd be it
was fun you know mostly it was fun I did
it to practice I did it because people
would laugh at my replies etc but I'm
going to stop doing that as of today I'm
going to start giving people no second
chance so if somebody comes in with
their stupid laundry list oh but your
president is a big old racist and here's
the 10 things that I hallucinate he did
block because that person is not a real
voice that person is a person who's got
who's got an act they came to bother you
and they came to boost their own signal
because if you interact with the trolls
you're given them more visibility and
you're you're making their day you're
giving them exactly what they want don't
give them what they want just shut them
down you can you can completely shut
down you can completely shut down the
the effectiveness of the other side by
blocking them on the first offense so
from now on first offense if it's
personal so here are the rules
I don't block anybody for disagreeing
with what I said
I don't block anybody for saying oh
here's a link you didn't consider this
disagreement completely completely
acceptable and if I ever if I ever
violate that line I know that you'll
keep me honest all right but the
monitors personal don't wait for the
second thing
don't answer and don't wait for a second
insult removal just like that now the
other people I remove are the people who
they try to read my mind in public so
there are quite a few people who will
tweet and they'll include me ins tweets
and they'll say something like well
Scott will block you for having a people
like to say this Scott will block you
for proving him wrong online okay if you
say that I will block you because I
don't do that so anybody who tries to
read my mind and say in public what they
think I'm thinking you're always wrong
so I'm gonna block you instantly because
somebody like that doesn't ever go away
if you interact with them if you let
them go they'll just keep saying more of
this stuff so get rid of it all right
now at the same time if you are
successfully acting nice online
eventually that's going to become a
story because social media is doing
something for you that looks terrible
but might not work out as terrible as
you think what what the social media
platforms are doing are ahead of the
2020 election and maybe just because
it's ordinary business they're getting
rid of the most provocative voices on
social media they are doing both sides
alright you could argue that it's not
equal and and you know I'm sure that's
his argument worth having but the
Krassin Stein's have been banned who was
it who was the other guy who got banned
recently anyway the point is there are
bands on both sides I wouldn't worry too
much about the fact that there are more
conservatives being banned because if
the people being banned
farik obvious so fair account got banned
so what's happening is the the voices on
the right that are the ones that would
ruin your reputation are being knocked
off the system now woods is a special
case because he's not really banned all
he has to do is get rid of one tweet
that has no importance don't don't put
Jameson woods into the category of
real people who say things and get
banned is a different situation he could
be back the moment he gets rid of one
tweet there's knowing no importance so
that's a choice and likewise if you're
if you find yourself in the James Woods
situation where he in his opinion since
the thing he got banned for was a famous
quote and it was not really a call to
violence he's he's resting on principle
apparently I don't want to read his mind
but it looks like he's making a
principled stand that free speech is
free speech and it doesn't matter
there's somebody else reinterpreted it
wrong that's not the point so I
understand that point I accept it it's
credible it's you know it's real but if
you want to be effective I don't think
that's working so it's a principled
stand that I'll think works do you know
what would work staying on social media
and say things that are healthy and good
and persuasive that would help did what
did you what did James Woods do for you
alright when he's online he's a powerful
voice that as a you know we hope a
productive outcome when he allows
himself to be banned over a tweet that
has no importance to anybody in the
world is he helping you he's not he's
not helping you he's not he's not
changing anything he's not helping
himself he's just got a little vacation
from social media so don't be don't be
James Woods you know I I say again I'll
respect a principled stand and he seems
to be taking that so I do respect that
I'm just saying that it doesn't help
anything
does it's not effective it's not
effective at all all right so be nice on
social media block the trolls
immediately do not interact with them
don't let them put words in your your
mouth
so the other people I've I will delete
is if I get into a conversation online
and they say something along the lines
of you know you keep saying this and
this is why you're wrong
say yes they put words in my mouth you
can't fix that the people who say but
what you're really thinking you can't
fix that all right here's a little
lesson on persuasion that I'd like to
try it out because you might need to use
this one I started on this point and I'm
circling back to it so the Washington
Post I guess there might have been there
Washington bureau chief doesn't matter
how it was he tweeted that the president
is going to have problems criticizing
Biden for his 1994 crime bill because
the president quote has his own problems
with the the Central Park five situation
which was also a long time ago now
here's the thing the Central Park five
thing President Trump did a full-page ad
in which he was complaining about Prague
and said maybe we should have the death
penalty for these horrible crimes he did
not mention race although there was
obviously the context was that the five
african-american gentleman who had been
arrested and later were acquitted were
released I forget what but that they
were they were found not guilty he
believed they were guilty but their race
was never part of the conversation Trump
Trump never mentioned race he mentioned
crime we have seen quite clearly that he
talks about crime is crime and when it
came to for example the the prison
reform bill President Trump did not say
oh we can't do that because it's good
for black people you know you went ahead
and did it because it's good for people
so when the Washington Post said he's
got this problem because of this Central
Park five situation decades ago here's
the right response and it's the one that
I gave I said that the Washington Post
has equated crime and black people and
they need to explain that cuz that's
what happened I'm not making that up
President
talked about cried that's it he talked
about crime and the death penalty if
other people say that's about race you
can't make that argument unless you are
introducing into the conversation that
crime and black people are equated that
is racist criticizing the president for
making a stand about crime without
mentioning race and then going in and
saying hey this is some kind of racist
anti black people the only way you can
make that criticism is if you yourself
are a racist who has decided that crime
and black people are somehow paired the
president didn't do that he never did
that he never has done that and I'm
pretty sure he'd never will because
there's no evidence that he thinks that
way he does hate crime that is as clear
as possible there's no doubt anyplace
mind that he's anti-crime like seriously
seriously anti-crime and he's can still
do a crime doll because it made sense
and it was good for the country
somebody's saying I don't agree with you
in all issues talking to me but this
point is the reason I follow you thank
you so if you're in the situation and I
know you will be between now and 2020
somebody's going to bring up the Central
Park five you've a response to it should
be Trump never mentioned race at
Bessette that's all you should say about
Trump the rest of what you should say is
about the fricking jerk who is trying to
equate black people and crime which
bothers me honestly like I'm not saying
this as some clever little thing you
know persuasion wise it is persuasion
and I am teach you got to do that but it
frickin bothers me it bothers me that
the racists are accusing somebody who
has an active that way of being a racist
it's like extra bothering that there's
some form of projection going on there
ain't using that word projection because
I'm not us like psychologist so I
withdraw that word
I actually mocked that word
in my upcoming book all right that's all
I got today so so I hope this little
little dose of dopamine was good I'm
going to keep working on the dopamine
angle for these periscopes and by the
way if you did not know these periscopes
get downloaded in an hour so they will
be available on youtube to find them you
would just search for the phrase real
coffee with scott adams remember the
real part real coffee with scallops and
then you can have them the YouTube
experience if you prefer that the live
ones will will be on periscope if you
want to get refresh but let us end with
a second simultaneous sip in case you
missed the first one because it's so
good so good razor drug with me and join
me now that's all for now and let's
enjoy the day