Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive August 22, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #2493

Episode 2493 CWSA 06/02/24

Episode #2493 Jun 2, 2024 1:52:53 38,911 views

Wait until I connect the dots today on politics and the news ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better day. Let me tell you, the omens are all lining up for an amazing, amazing day, probably the best you've ever seen. Now let's see. There I am. No, I still do…

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

ur experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their tiny human smooth brains, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass or a tankard, a chalice, a stein, a thermos flask, a sippy cup, or a bottle, whatever kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now…

View segment →
NewsReaction AI & Technology

's talk about the news. Today's Dilbert Reborn shows you, in the first panel, I posted it on X, you can see that I designed it with AI. So the first panel of the Dilbert comic, I used AI to tell me some interesting camera angles or perspectives for a guy on his computer when a dog walks into the roo…

View segment →
NewsReaction Economics & Finance

n robots that take another 25 percent off the price or something like that. I tell you that if there's a way to invest in solar, I'm not recommending you invest in it because I don't make recommendations for investments, but it does seem like maybe there's something that's going to happen here that…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

g before I did? All right, enough about you. Tucker Carlson's being really outspoken on his video recently. Said nothing is ever about our safety and that all the big political stuff is clearly about the interests of the people in power. He said this country and the world only changes when we elimi…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

als, and if you assume that Democrats don't have an option, they have to be diverse, it's their brand, so they're forced to be diverse but they're demonstrating to the rest of the world through what I would consider the most incompetent administration of all time and the most incompetent campaign an…

View segment →
MainContent Confirmation Bias

strategy because they don't have anything of substance. Trump has substance. He can say you see all that crime, I'm going to do the normal things that people normally do to get less of it. Is that imaginary? I don't think so. Seems pretty real. He says he's going to negotiate with Putin and Zelensky…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

ease the audio when they've willingly and already and publicly and everybody's seeing the transcript? What reason could there be other than it sounds really terrible? Like really bad. It must be awful. Just guessing. But listen to one of the arguments that they just proffered. They say that the aud…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

ere's how David Sacks explains it. He calls it the business records double standard. In 2016 Hillary Clinton's campaign was fined $8,000. That was it. A fine of $8,000 for the following, for violating federal campaign finance laws. Why? Her team falsely reported the funding of the Steele dossier as…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

et? Quite a few, right? So and I'll stay with that. You might be the smartest person I've ever met. Now here I'm calling smart not just depth but breadth. He can tell you the better take on more topics than any human being I've ever met and it'll be a different take and it'll be better than one you…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

te's charges depended entirely upon the fact that there were also federal violations per their case. So if you were to pardon Trump from the federal part of it it would make the state part of it dissolve because the state part of it depended on the federal part. So even though the federal part was n…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

world as anybody could be and he seems totally unconvinced there's any danger there and I agree with him completely. I think it's just a club for rich people. Meanwhile in Ukraine, Russia's trying to bomb Kharkiv. What is the second biggest city? It's not Kiev. It's Kharkiv. I forget anyway. It loo…

View segment →

Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better day. Let me tell you, the omens are all lining up for an amazing, amazing day, probably the best you've ever seen.

Now let's see. There I am. No, I still don't see the feed. All right, it would be live. That's where it would be. There I am. We're live.

Well, if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their tiny human smooth brains, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass or a tankard, a chalice, a stein, a thermos flask, a sippy cup, or a bottle, whatever kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the immediate sip of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it's going to happen now.

Ah. Powering up. You know what? I feel like I feel so good. I feel like an outlaw. Yeah, that's how good I feel. How am I feeling? Felonious. Yeah, felonious. It's a great feeling.

All right, let's talk about the news. Today's Dilbert Reborn shows you, in the first panel, I posted it on X, you can see that I designed it with AI. So the first panel of the Dilbert comic, I used AI to tell me some interesting camera angles or perspectives for a guy on his computer when a dog walks into the room. Now AI can't produce my characters because it'll complain about copyright and stuff, but it can give me a generic guy and a generic dog. And then when I have the angle of all the furniture, I just replace them with my characters. So you can see how that worked out. It gave me a new angle that I had never used before. So that's my first, I think my first real-world repeatable. I'll definitely use it again. AI assist to writing my daily comic. So it's sort of a milestone.

Well, apparently there's a Tesla deal being worked out to give Elon Musk his money that they gave him and then took away from him. The courts took away. And the only portion that he would be able to use for five years is to pay the taxes that he would owe if he were to get it right away. So apparently you can't just take the money and run. Some people were worried about that. He'd have to stay there for five years to get his money. So it should make the stockholders a little bit happy if he has to stay there and work for another five years. So we'll see. We hope he gets his money.

There's a gigantic Wall Street Journal story. It says there's a huge cost-saving technology for making solar panels. Now you've heard this story a billion times, but this one sounds pretty promising. I didn't realize that China can make solar panels at roughly half the price of an American manufacturer, but with this new technology it should close that gap a lot. And apparently it's not just theoretical. It looks like it's ready to put into the system. Yeah, I won't get into the technical details, but it reduces the amount of silver they need, makes something thinner than before, and would reduce the cost substantially.

And I ask you again, which one of the climate models takes into account technical innovations that totally change the curve? None. Because you can't put in a climate model the thing that hasn't been invented yet. And yet we know there'll be tons of things invented between now and when they imagine the Earth is going to burn up. So if you don't put human invention in your 100-year model, is that credible? Think about how different the world is in any 20-year period. You know, it's the difference between AI and no AI, computers and no computers, smartphones and no smartphones. Twenty years is a long time. So these climate models are absurd in leaving out probably the biggest variable. I mean, you think if you're looking at climate change, the biggest variable is the CO2 or the sun or the ocean, but probably the biggest variable is human innovation. It's not even in the model, right? Tell me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that the models assume that we don't innovate for the rest of humankind. We just sort of die.

All right, so that's happening. Here's the scariest, coolest thing. There's a Swiss startup that has made a computer out of brain organoids. Now I don't know what an organoid is, but I'm going to guess it's something like an artificial brain that they built in a Petri dish or a tube or something. So I don't think it came from a human. I hope. You know, maybe the cells did or something. But they now have, in the real world apparently, you can connect to this thing if you're paying them, and it consumes a million times less power than regular digital processors. And it's fast. Let me say that again. There will be a data center, a data center. This is already real, by the way. This is not speculative. This is today functioning. There's human brain parts that they've somehow connected to a digital interface, and they use the human brain part to do the calculating at one million times less power than regular stuff.

Do you think there's any way that if it works and it can be reproduced, that it does work? As so it's already up and running. So if it could be reproduced at scale, who in the world is going to pay for regular computing when you can have a computer that gets a million times less power? We are building a human brain slash cyborg. The Borg. I don't know. It's super cool but also super whoa, because you don't know what could go wrong. Wait a minute. How many ways could it go wrong if we start building human brain organoid computers? I don't know. I guess it raises questions. I'm not afraid of it per se, but it raises a lot of questions.

Well, NASA had to once again delay its astronaut crewed flight of what would be the Boeing Starliner, I think. First flight with astronauts. And I didn't see the reason that the flight was scrubbed, but I have a theory. It's a Boeing Starliner. And I think the problem is, you know how juries sometimes are sequestered? Yeah, if the jury is going to go home, sometimes the judge will say, oh, you can't go home. You have to stay away from any influence because you don't want them reading the news. They might act differently, the jurors, if they read the news. You want them to stick to just the trial data. And I'm starting to think that the astronauts for the Boeing Starliner maybe they should have been sequestered for the last month to maybe not see any news about Boeing's quality control lately. So I worry that the reason it's delayed is that the astronauts were watching the news and said, um, I think I've got a cold or something. I'm not sure I can go. Oh, my arm. So something's going wrong here. I'll never be able to control it. Maybe you better use the backup. I don't know. I'm just joking.

All right. Did you know that China's labor costs are about double that of the Philippines, Malaysia, India, Thailand, and Vietnam? I'll tell you, you think that the United States has trouble. You think we have problems. We do. But how would you like to be China and your entire situation depends on manufacturing because it's the backbone of the economy, and you're twice as expensive as the alternatives? And everybody has a gigantic incentive to get their business out of there. What are they going to do? Now, besides the fact that these countries have half the cost and they presumably are building up some infrastructure so they can be serious competitors to China. But I also haven't heard about Mexico. I don't know what the cost of labor is in Mexico compared to China. And I also don't know what's going to happen with robots. Because if we're making these much cheaper solar panels and then we get rid of the labor by putting robots in the factories. So you use a manufacturing process that drops the price by, I don't know, half, and then you put in robots that take another 25 percent off the price or something like that.

I tell you that if there's a way to invest in solar, I'm not recommending you invest in it because I don't make recommendations for investments, but it does seem like maybe there's something that's going to happen here that could be gigantic. You don't really think of robots influencing energy except to use it. You know, they use a lot of energy. But they're going to be building the solar panels and the solar plants and the solar everything and probably the nuclear power plants too soon.

All right, so there's a story that we don't know what the real story is, but Alex Jones is going through something that looks bad. Now he's saying that the feds came to his door and they were trying to lock him out and take all of his stuff and close him down. But he was also acting, let's say I'm going to say emotional. If it were somebody I didn't like, I would use other words. But since I like him, you know, he was nice to me, he's had me on the show, and when somebody's nice to me in person, I can't really just go in public and then trash him. Like, it just, I'm just not built that way. So because I've met him in person and he was very generous to me, I'll say that he's having an emotional reaction that we don't quite understand. Some people say it's mental health. Some people say it's substance. Some people say it's both. Some people say get an MRI. But I think his staff has backed him up. By the way, his staff is on the same page. So it's not just him. Whatever is going on, his staff seems to have witnessed it as well. So I don't know who these feds were or what exactly they were trying to do, except that it's in the context of everybody who is pro-Trump getting a hit. So I don't know what's going on, but keep an eye on it. He may need some help in any variety of ways. We don't know what the problem is, but he's clearly in a crisis situation. And so if you have any interest in either his operation or him as a human being, have a little bit of empathy and keep an eye on that. Maybe there's a way you can help one way or another.

All right. Mexico. Here's a story that snuck up on me. Imagine finding this out today. This is kind of mind-blowing. The next president of Mexico is likely to be a Jewish woman. Is this the first time you're hearing that? I heard it today. So apparently they're having an election. The sitting president can't run again. They have one-term presidents, six years. And the mentor, somebody who's worked closely with the current president, so he's recommending her. And that's the reason she's getting her push. Claudia Sheinbaum, a Jewish woman with a PhD in energy engineering. That's about as perfect as you can get, isn't it? How would you like to be the president of Mexico? You're coming in with a PhD in energy engineering. But it gets better. She's bilingual. She used to live in the Bay Area. She used to live in the Bay Area. She's bilingual. The current president of Mexico is not bilingual. Do you think that makes a difference? Hell yes. Hell yes. Language is the big uniter, right? If you can talk to somebody in the same language, it's a whole different experience, right? That's how you bond. You don't really bond with Putin if he can't speak your language or she. But wouldn't it be nice to have somebody we could work with in the same language who's a PhD in energy engineering?

Now we all assume that the cartels have undue influence on the government, so there's that. But are you also surprised that Mexico would be even considering, apparently she's way ahead in the polls, it looks like it's a lock, very popular. Did you see a female president of Mexico coming anytime soon? It's kind of interesting and impressive. And this is the DEI you want, you know what I mean? This is diversity done correctly as far as I can tell. The only reason she's being considered is that she's overwhelmingly qualified. So how about that? How about just being overwhelmingly qualified and then getting the top job? Okay, I'm good with that. So at least on paper she looks like exactly the person that America would want in that job as well as the Mexicans. So maybe something good's coming out of that.

And there is talk that Mexico's going to have an economic boom like you've never seen before because, remember, the manufacturing is moving toward it. That's a good sign. And they've got some major infrastructure things like maybe a railroad and some other stuff that will connect the resorts and turn it into more of a well-engineered destination. So all that's happening if the cartels don't derail things. There's something good that could happen.

Now I've said this before, but here's what I think is the only hope for living with Mexico. I'm seeing somebody mocking me for quote believing in solar. Let's pretend that you know what you're talking about. Now, did you think I was unaware that there's a waste problem? Of course there is. Of course there is. Am I unaware that people are not good at calculating the relative cost and benefits in the future of different technological options? I used to do that work. I know it can't be done. It used to be my job to calculate expenses in the future. You can't really do that. It was my job, but I couldn't do it and nobody can do it. So do I think that, do I know what the economics of solar power will be next year? No, I don't. You know what? But do you know what I do know? That the person who is mocking me, you don't know. No, you're an idiot who thinks you know the expenses of technologies you've never been involved with because you read an article somewhere, right? I'm smart enough to know that I don't know what will be the competing cost structures 20 years from now, which is what you have to think about, right? It's not what it is today. It's if you start a project, what does your nuclear power plant cost in 10 years when you're done with it? You know, what is your solar plant and your gigafactory or your giga storage thing? What does it cost in 10 or 20 years? Nobody knows that. If you think you know it, dear troll commenter, well, you're the smartest person in the world according to you because you know what can't be known. Good for you.

Did you know about this story about the technology that would lower the cost of solar? Did you read that this morning before I did?

All right, enough about you. Tucker Carlson's being really outspoken on his video recently. Said nothing is ever about our safety and that all the big political stuff is clearly about the interests of the people in power. He said this country and the world only changes when we eliminate the CIA. It'll take someone willing to be assassinated. He gives examples. He said you open the southern border to anyone who wants to come in. You're not checking IDs. You're not doing any kind of biometrics. You're not even screening for COVID. So clearly you don't care about my safety. Check, check, check. Correct. Yes, there is no evidence that the people in power of our country are interested in the well-being of the citizens. There is plenty of evidence, the open border, that they're operating against our interests for reasons we don't quite understand. I don't understand it. We'll talk about more of that later.

But he's saying directly that the CIA has to be cancelled completely. I saw an ex-CIA operative, agent, whatever you want to call them, also on Tucker show saying that when Trump was the president he didn't use the CIA as much as he used private intelligence people to tell him what was going on. Why would he do that? Why would you pay somebody to do the job of the CIA when the CIA is already being paid and therefore it's free on an incremental basis? Why would you do that? I can only think of one reason. That the president of the United States did not think that the CIA was on the same side as he was. In other words, Trump, the person who knew the most about the CIA while in office, had the most access, didn't believe that he could trust them with the security of the United States. You have to eliminate them under that situation. If a sitting president doesn't think they're even on the same side, not even on the same side, you can't live with that. So if you can buy these services on the open market and you don't trust the ones in the government, there is an argument for eliminating the CIA. And it's strong. You'd have to hear the other side, and I'm not sure they can tell the other side because it'd be full of secrets. But is there a surface-y argument that says getting rid of the CIA? The most, that's a pretty radical thing to do. Is there an argument for it? Yeah, there is.

You know, there was a time when the CIA was overthrowing governments and doing all kinds of things to help America control the world. And you could have at that time said I don't like America doing all these other things in other countries, so I don't like the CIA. But there would have been a good argument to keep them because, let me make the Machiavellian power argument here. Wouldn't it be nice if the United States left all the other countries alone and left them to pursue their best interest for their people until they become thriving democracies and allies of us in the future, once they've used their own free will and their own resources to become an independent country that could be like a strong ally for us? No, not in the real world. In the real world if we didn't take them over, somebody else would have, right? China would have taken them because whoever has money can control any small entity, whether it's a country, a politician, or another country. Yeah, any other country. So it doesn't take much money to overthrow a country. You just bribe the right people and there you go. Yeah, you maybe could bribe 50 people to overthrow any country and they're probably all bribable. So the levers are there for controlling other countries.

But here's my argument, the Machiavellian argument for the CIA. They might be complete bastards who are doing terrible things to other countries every day, but if they didn't, what would happen? Somebody else would. And then we would be surrounded by countries that, let's say China had a lot of control over. That's no good. So the thing is that the worst, or best, let me say the best criminal wins. We don't live in a world where there's good versus evil. There's just evil versus evil at the government level. Humans tend to be closer to good. You know, if you leave them alone they're more likely to be good to each other because we're sort of tribal. We grew up that way. But countries are evil. As soon as you have a country it's probably corrupt no matter who it is. So maybe the strongest criminal organization is the one you want to be with. The strongest criminal organization at the moment, America appears to be the strongest criminal organization, which might be your safest situation in a historical sense. Historically you just wanted to be in the strongest country and it didn't matter why they were the strongest, right? Don't you think you were safer being a Roman citizen when Rome was at its peak? Without supporting that Rome were good guys. They weren't good guys. But it was probably the safest place to live in those times, you know, to be a Roman citizen. So we're sort of the Roman citizens. It feels like to me.

So yes, there's an argument that the CIA works against our interests, but I'd like to hear the counterargument. I just don't know anybody can make it because you'd have to say what I said. Yeah, we're kind of criminals. We do terrible things every single day. You wouldn't even want to know what we're doing in your name, but it keeps you safer because we're the best criminals. That might be the argument. And I could be convinced by that. I hate it, but it's a world in which sometimes your best choice is also terrible. Don't know.

All right, well, but keep in mind that Tucker's father was in the CIA, I believe, and he often thinks that, I mean he has a good window into that world. So I take his opinion seriously.

Oh, trolls being really extra stupid in public is not hurting me. It's just amusing me. Yeah, it's just amusing me. So thanks. Say some more really dumb things about the future of technology to entertain the rest of the commenters. They would like to see your stupidity in full flower. So say some more irrational things, please.

All right, let's talk about the hoaxocracy. As you know, the Biden campaign is built entirely on hoaxes, from the fine people hoax to the Trump tears gas peaceful protesters hoax and a lot more. Drinking bleach. It's one hoax after another. And the Biden-Harris headquarters X account said four years ago today Trump tears gassed peaceful protesters outside the White House. Well, it took about a minute before Joel Pollak fact-checked them hard. And nope, that was all debunked by sources that Democrats trust as well as Republicans. So why is it that the campaign can be so blatant about something that's been fact-checked and very clearly didn't happen? I mean absolutely did not happen and it's well known. Their audience is so underinformed, of course they know it's a lie, but they know it works so they're going to say it anyway.

I'm not so sure. I'm not so sure. I think that the Biden-Harris campaign is so DEI-crippled that the level of incompetence there, you can't really assume that it's normal. It's probably extraordinary. And if you're new to my commentary, let me quickly add we're not talking about anybody's genes or culture. That's not in the conversation about DEI. DEI is a system. It's not a person. It's not a person. It's a system. And the system moves people around like little chess pieces, and there aren't enough chess pieces for what they need to do. So they meet their diversity targets whether they have qualified candidates or not, because humans always meet the targets that they're measured on and their performance is judged upon. And that big thing they're judged on. So if you assume that DEI as a system is guaranteed to fail because the pipeline of qualified people would be smaller than the demand, forcing them to take lesser and lesser qualified people just to meet their diversity goals, and if you assume that Democrats don't have an option, they have to be diverse, it's their brand, so they're forced to be diverse but they're demonstrating to the rest of the world through what I would consider the most incompetent administration of all time and the most incompetent campaign and the most incompetent spokesperson, and all of those things are permeated with DEI hires which, if they were qualified to do their jobs, you would see a better job. Yeah, I'm not talking about one thing that I'm criticizing. There's a pervasive incompetence in the current government like we've never really seen before. And the campaign is so obviously incompetent and they're so obviously backing the wrong guy that this is sort of the Biden campaign is basically your canary in the coal mine for every corporation, right? They just got to diversity faster because they're so public. They really had to. Companies are also trying to go as fast as they can, but you can see what happens when you get to DEI diversity goals when you have a limited pipeline of qualified people, again because of systemic racism at the school level just not producing enough diverse candidates. So yeah, the hoax campaign and the DEI incompetence should bring down the whole house in a few months. I'm expecting a complete demolition of the Biden campaign. I think we're close to the point where the whole thing's just going to come off the rails in a way we've never seen before. Maybe a whistleblower. We'll see.

I was watching a body language expert look at the two faces of Biden because that's sort of becoming a thing. And the one face is his angry troll face that looks like a cat's all puckered up. You know, his face is all squeezed like all of his face meets in his nose, one little puckered place. And then you see his wide-eyed open vessel. So he's got the demon look where he looks demon-possessed. And then in the same talk sometimes he'll have the empty vessel where his eyes are wide open and his mouth is forming that Hillary Clinton looking at balloons drop. And you say to yourself, how in the world is that the same person? And we still don't know. I love the fact that he's clearly two different people. I mean I think it's the same organic person, but there's something that causes him to be a different personality so much so he doesn't even look the same. Not even a little bit. I mean you can generally recognize it's Biden, but you would think it's a different person if they stood next to each other. So here are the possibilities. One is drugs. One is mental illness. One is some kind of a deepfake thing, but I don't think so. And one is maybe there's something about editing. For example, you've seen all the quick edits they've done on his videos. Could it be that they have to take so much time off between edits that he takes a nap and just recovers and he wakes up and his eyes are open and he's the morning version? Could it be that we're seeing Morning Joe? Hey, Morning Joe, get it? Could it be that when we see Morning Joe he's a little bit more lucid and that when we see evening Joe that he's declined into his dementia yelling puckered face? Something like that. Whatever is going on is really bad. It's not good, whatever it is.

All right. I can't wait for the first interview with the imaginary Republican who's not going to vote for Trump because the lawfare got him. Have any of you met that person yet? I mean I'm being told often and reliably by all the polls that people have decided that since Trump got convicted by an unfair trial that therefore they're not going to vote for him. So we're all waiting to see the person, right? You know where I think that person is? I don't know, but I think the imaginary Republican who's not going to vote for Trump because of lawfare could be hanging out and partying with the black American voter who didn't know how to get an ID. I think they're together because we can't find either one of them. And I think maybe they're helping each other hide. So somewhere, maybe in cabins, possibly in the mountains where the MAGA supremacists are gathering their imaginary armies. So it could be that the imaginary MAGA supremacist armies that are in the hills are creating a sanctuary for the imaginary Republicans who say they won't vote for Trump. But maybe also I'd like to say that they're diverse and that they've included the black Americans who want to vote and know enough about the world that they think voting makes sense yet can't figure out how to get an ID. Yeah, we know they exist. We were told they exist. We've never talked to one. We've never seen one. But the Democrats are quite sure the imaginary army in the hills and the imaginary Republicans who don't like Trump now and the imaginary guy who can't get an ID, they're all real.

And what about the imaginary events that they're running on? Every part of the Democrat platform is imaginary. All the hoaxes are imaginary. All the data that they give us about their current performance, completely imaginary. They say they're controlling the border, everything's fine. That's imaginary. What about the money that they're spending? Is Biden spending real money? Not anymore. When you have $35 trillion in debt, whatever it is that you're spending is imaginary because whoever lent it to you, they ain't getting it back. So we've got an imaginary economy, imaginary data. We've got real problems that they imagine or not. They've got an imaginary Trump who's in their imagination tried to take over on January 6 and they imagined that he would do it again even though he never did it. They think he'll do again the thing he never did once. So we have imaginary policies, imaginary people, imaginary Trump in the future, imaginary data. Do Republicans do that? Could you reverse the argument and say, oh Scott, I see your point, but look at all the imaginary things that the Republicans believe. Now maybe you would go after religion if you were not religious. You'd say oh they believe in imaginary stuff. But is it imaginary to think that your nine-month-old fetus is sort of alive? Is that imaginary? That doesn't seem imaginary. You could differ on what you think about it or what the law should be, but it's not imaginary, right? The debt is not imaginary. The lawfare is not imaginary. Even CNN's analysts are saying it's real.

So here's what I think has happened. I think the Democrats sort of tiptoed into the imaginary world and it worked because they can control the press for at least their base. They can tell them literally anything. And once they realize that you can tell them anything and the actual reality won't make any difference because they also control the fact-checkers, they realize that going fully imaginary is a better strategy. And I agree, by the way. It's a better strategy because they don't have anything of substance. Trump has substance. He can say you see all that crime, I'm going to do the normal things that people normally do to get less of it. Is that imaginary? I don't think so. Seems pretty real. He says he's going to negotiate with Putin and Zelensky to end the war. Now it might be hard, but is it imaginary? It's not imaginary. And the entire reason we're in Ukraine, do you think the government told you the real reason that we're in Ukraine? No, they gave you an imaginary reason. The imaginary reason is that Putin's going to roll up Europe if he gets Ukraine, with no regard to the fact that some of us know the history of Ukraine and that, as Mike Benz can explain better, the whole thing looks like an energy play between two criminal organizations, one United States and the other Russia. And basically it's like we're stealing their drug stash so we can sell it ourselves, their energy. That's a better way to look at it.

So I can't think of anything the Democrats are doing that isn't imaginary. Because once you realize that your imaginary case will always be stronger than the real world one, why would you ever use the real world? It's unnecessary. They've actually found a way to depart from all reality without paying for it. It's free because as long as their press keeps backing them, their own people will never go read Breitbart. You know, the Democrats will never go over to Fox News just to see what the other people say. Although surprisingly Fox News does have a lot of Democrat viewers, but I feel like they might be conservatives.

All right, let's go on to some more. This is going to get better as I go, by the way. I've organized my materials so that I'm going to reach a crescendo. So don't leave before the crescendo. That'd be crazy.

All right. So disgraced DA Alvin Bragg. I like just using disgraced in front of everything. All right. So there seems to be a whole bunch of trolls on YouTube. All the behavior of social media looks suspicious now. You know that I don't believe that the trolls are organic anymore, at least not during the election season. They're really active and they're yelling imaginary things. So the trolls are literally saying imaginary things about me to try to embarrass me on my own live stream. Let's see who would do that. Imaginary things. What group of people really, really, really love imaginary stuff? It's probably exactly what you think it is.

All right. So here's something I didn't know about Alvin Bragg. He went to Harvard. Are you telling me that all the times that people have been ripping on Alvin Bragg, nobody thought to mock him for having a degree from Harvard? Come on, people, improve your game. It's not for me to help you avoid these mistakes. No, it's funny. It's funny you went to Harvard. Now to be fair, not recently. So maybe he went to Harvard back when it made a difference what your credentials were. If he had just graduated from Harvard, I would be saying DEI hire because Harvard's become ridiculous about their standards. But maybe when he was there it was closer to he belonged there. So I don't know. I'm not going to say he didn't belong in Harvard because there was a time when Harvard was at least a little bit credible. But according to my digital creature from Amazon whose name I don't want to say out loud because I'll trigger it, he has a net worth of $41 million. But I didn't see that explained. Do you think it's true? So first of all, I don't know it's true. It's just coming from the digital assistant. So somebody could have put wrong information on there. But is he independently wealthy and how so? I guess I would ask for a fact check on that. I do not assert that to be true, just to be clear. I do not assert that it's true, but it's on at least one source of information. So I'm curious about that.

Did you know that Michigan, they were looking at a law to make it harder to cheat, but the Democrats had the advantage and they passed laws to make it easier to cheat, right? It's 2024 and in Michigan the Democrats unanimously passed legislation that would make it easier to cheat, not harder. Can you think of a reason why they do that? Do you think they're planning on an imaginary election where you imagine that you knew the results but really you don't? Well, that's what I'd worry about. That was from the Gateway Pundit. They're reporting. Also Gateway Pundit is saying that there's some poll of Arab American voters and Biden is way off in his popularity. He had a 60 percent Arab American vote in 2020, but he's down to about 20 percent support now. I don't think the Arab American community is big enough that it's going to move the election, but wow, I think it's one more sign of complete collapse. I don't think we realize how close the Democrat Party is to total collapse because until it happens it doesn't look like it's going to happen. You know, nothing happens until something happens. So I feel like the major tent pole holding up the Democrats is really creaky right now. And if that one cracks, the rest go.

Do you know what the tent pole is that holds up the entire Democrat Party? It's the fine people hoax. If the fine people hoax can be debunked so that Democrats can see it in a way that's credible, that takes everything away. And the fact that the Republicans don't go after that, you know, basically just people like me, pundits, do. I never really understood that anyway.

Tim Pool abruptly cut his own live stream because he had Laura Loomer as a guest. And Laura Loomer was talking about getting back at Democrats and that there was enough crime there that if Trump got back in office there would be a number of people who should be dealt with with the legal process. However, I think her rhetoric reached a point where Tim Pool's entire show was probably at risk if he didn't pull it down himself. So I'm going to give Tim Pool a big compliment. Nicely done. Nicely done. So I'll tell you in softer words what Laura Loomer said so that I also don't get cancelled.

All right. So Laura Loomer said that the level of the criminal behavior consistent with the laws on the books for treason might go to the level of the death penalty. Now here's the problem. If you were to say hey, people might be guilty of certain crimes, here's why we think they are, the penalty for that could be the death penalty, it should be on the table. That's okay because you're just talking about the law. Here's what I think is too far. And let's see if you would have spotted it because Tim Pool did. So he's good at this, right? If you say let's get a list of names of people and then before you've tried them you say we want to kill these people, then you sort of become Alvin Bragg yourself. You hear what I'm saying? You don't want to start with the person and then talk about the death penalty unless you've really had a lot of conversations and in a court case that's credible about those charges. But it's real dangerous to go full Fannie Willis or who was it, Letitia James, and say you're running for office to get Trump. That's too far. Somehow she's not paying for that, but it's way too far. So Tim Pool I think very smartly and very decisively said oh shoot, she just gave YouTube a predicate to cancel my whole channel and I'm not going to die on this hill. It wasn't even my opinion. This was a guest's opinion. So nice move. Nice move, Tim Pool. Because the information still gets out. You know, the social media picks it up, but he reduces his risk on YouTube and he lives to fight again. Total respect for that. Nicely played. Good decision-making. And I don't think you could have played that better. And you know I don't mind that Laura Loomer has her opinion, so it's not about her opinion. I think that part was fine. It's just you don't want to give YouTube this fresh batch of red meat to cancel you because they want to cancel Tim Pool. So well played.

Jonathan Turley, still national treasure, talking about any of the legal elements of politics. So he talks about the fact that the whole situation where the government or the Republicans were trying to get a hold of the audio that they only have the transcript of Biden doing his testimony to Hur. And of course the Democrats say hey, you have the transcript, that's good enough. And then the Republicans say yeah, but we don't trust the transcript. We think you might have edited it and it might be way worse than the transcript shows. And we have a right to know because if Biden is not capable, it's got to be 25th Amendment situation. So they definitely have a right to know. I completely support their attempt to get that. But listen to, according to Turley, the Justice Department is making a new claim for why they can't release the audio of something they've already released the transcript to. Can you think of any reason why you wouldn't release the audio when they've willingly and already and publicly and everybody's seeing the transcript? What reason could there be other than it sounds really terrible? Like really bad. It must be awful. Just guessing.

But listen to one of the arguments that they just proffered. They say that the audio tape must be withheld due to the risk that it could be altered by artificial intelligence and passed off as an authentic in a deepfake release. Quote, the passage of time and advancements in audio artificial intelligence and deepfake technologies only amplify concerns about malicious manipulation of audio files. Wouldn't that apply to everything that anybody has on audio? I feel like that is such a stretch, such a stretch that it's almost just laughable. But I'm going to surprise you. It's not a terrible argument. It strikes you as immediately absurd. I mean that's how it struck me. But let me support it as best I can. It's somewhat rare that you would have a situation where there's an audio only because that's easier to deepfake. If it had been something he'd said in public it'd be easy to debunk it because you'd say okay, here's the real one. He said this in public. Now you can see how the deepfake changed it. But since the only public thing we'd have is an audio that nobody listens to, if somebody were to take a clip out of it and do a 10-second clip where it sounds like he said the N-word or something ridiculous, then I think people would believe it. I do, because if the headline story said the audio tape is out and then you saw a clip and then you played it and you heard what you thought was Biden's voice and he sounded really dementia-ridden and crazy and saying racist stuff and whatever, you might believe it. And we're close enough to the election where a fake audio tape could actually change things. Remember the audio tape of Trump saying grab them by the, people thought that was going to change the election. It turns out it didn't. But is it a realistic risk that when you're this close to an election and it's the president who's running for reelection and it's audio only, it is actually an unusually big risk, wouldn't you agree? Because I think somebody would alter it immediately. That it's not even a risk. It would happen. It would happen. I think you could say with complete confidence that there would be at least a parody version which people would think was real. At the very least it would be a parody version where he's just saying crazy stuff.

So I don't think this should be upheld because if you generalize this it would be devastating to the normal operation of the world. But it's not crazy. It's not crazy that it opens the door to a bad thing happening. But let me suggest this, and I think the people asking for it will say the same thing. We already have the transcript and we already have a zillion hours of Biden talking on audio and other places. AI doesn't need the specific audio from the event. All you have to do is run the transcript through it on a voice that's trained as Biden and then if that works you go back in and you edit the transcript and feed back into AI again. So instead of saying the real transcript in Biden's voice, it adds the N-word or some crazy thing. So I feel as if maybe the lawyers making this ask don't understand how AI works. Did they not understand that whether we have the transcript or not or whether we have the audio or not, it actually doesn't have any effect on whether somebody would make a deepfake? Yeah, the defect that they're worried about could be made tomorrow based on what's already publicly available with no research whatsoever. You know, just Google transcript. And yeah, actually you don't even have to have the transcript because if you're going to do a fake one you can make up the transcript. Nobody's going to check. See, the trouble with fakes is that they do their damage before they're debunked and the debunk never gets the attention of the original. So there's nothing that you couldn't do right now to fake that.

Okay, so Trump went to the UFC yesterday, got a standing ovation. It was crazy. Do you know what that standing ovation at the UFC sounded like to me? Well, if you just heard it on the surface it sounded like yay Trump yay. But here's what I heard. We'll take the outlaw. Did you see the crowd? Almost all men. Well, I mean dominant male audience. The men there were very clearly by their reaction saying outlaw. You just made him better. There's almost nothing you could have done to Trump that would have been as good for his brand than becoming an outlaw to the crooked government. Honestly, I love it. My honest opinion without the spin. You know it's the spin season so even I, as much as I try to avoid spinning, everybody's going to do it this season. But honestly, in my body and my real mind, no spin, I just love that he's an outlaw because the way he got there. You know if he'd robbed a bank I'd say no. But the way he got there, oh yeah, yeah, I want the outlaw. Absolutely, positively, no qualms about it. Give me the outlaw. And that's what the UFC audience basically said in their own way.

But it gets better. After UFC fighter Kevin Holland won, he jumped over the ring and went right to President Trump, former President Trump, and shook his hand and said some private words to him in support. Obviously Trump slapped him on the shoulders and obviously they're now friends. You should know that UFC fighter Kevin Holland is black. Does it matter? Yes, yep, because it's public and people are very affected by social forces. So if you see a black superstar going right to President Trump and congratulating him, that's powerful. Yeah, a lot of clips on it. Likewise UFC fighter Sean Strickland said on the microphone to the crowd, President Trump, you're the man. It is a damn travesty what they're doing to you. I'll be donating to you. I'll be donating to you is the key phrase.

By the way, I don't know if you have the current data, but in the 48 hours after the felony conviction verdict Trump had already earned 1.6 million per felony. Per felony. Yeah. And if you do the math, people say he's not really a good business person, but by my calculations he invested 130,000 and he got a return of 53 million. That's some good investing. You know he doesn't get credit for that. So yeah, it's 1.6 million per felony. His per-indictment numbers are not as good, but I think they'll be improving as well. So I think we should be measuring Trump's donation gathering by felonies. So if he could get, I feel like he's only maybe 12 to 17 felonies away from having all the money he needs for the rest of the campaign. So I think we're like three or four felonies away from being really rich with cash. So there's that.

Trump also at the UFC announced that he's getting on TikTok now. You might know that I think that TikTok needs to be cancelled or divested into the US. But as long as it's there I guess I gotta agree with Vivek and with Trump. If it's there and it matters and it's a big way to reach voters, sure, why not?

All right. David Sacks and others are pointing out the lawfare double standard here that Hillary Clinton did similar things without penalty. So here's how David Sacks explains it. He calls it the business records double standard. In 2016 Hillary Clinton's campaign was fined $8,000. That was it. A fine of $8,000 for the following, for violating federal campaign finance laws. Why? Her team falsely reported the funding of the Steele dossier as legal services and legal and compliance consulting. Well what does that sound like? This sounds exactly like what Trump did. Exactly. What else do we know? According to Sacks, actually this opposition research was an attempt to smear her opponent with false and salacious allegations. Obviously it was also intended to influence the election. So she recorded it as a lawyer expense. But really no matter what she was thinking, because as Megyn Kelly explained on her video the other day, that it doesn't matter what anybody was thinking when they did the expense. It only matters that a reasonable person could look at it and say well there's more than one reason you would do that. So when Trump did his payments it didn't matter that he was thinking it was mostly about the election. This is Megyn Kelly's take. It had more to do with the fact that a reasonable person would say well there's more than one reason you would want that information not to get out. One's your family, one's your business reputation, and the other is political. So if everybody agrees that there were three reasons that should have been reason enough that he can't be convicted. You need one reason. If there's three it's just sort of automatically you're not guilty.

So Hillary obviously was putting this into legal expenses to hide her contribution to the hoax. Of course. Moreover, says Sacks, Hillary's campaign was headquartered in New York State and of Brooklyn, New York, which would make it fall under the jurisdiction of New York penal law 175.10, the state law which makes it a felony to falsify business records with the intent to conceal the commission of a crime. I feel like that Steele dossier thing was a crime, wasn't it? It should have been. I don't know, maybe it wasn't technically, but should have been. And then Sacks asks what the key distinction between Hillary's campaign violation versus recent news. And he concludes with Hillary's violation, there wasn't a Manhattan prosecutor politically motivated to bring an unprecedented case to trial.

Now as you know, people who in the past may have leaned left in their politics like Elon Musk, and I'm not sure where David Sacks was, but he's clearly in the anti-Biden train at the moment. So you see some people that you wouldn't expect to be anti-Biden who are clearly anti-Biden. But let's look at the rest of them because it's a growing thing and I think the dam's about to burst.

ABC News says this in a post. Like any other American found guilty of a crime, Donald Trump is likely to face new restrictions and lose a number of rights due to his newfound felon status. What about this choice of words, found guilty of a crime? Isn't that an interesting phrase? He was found guilty. Why wouldn't you just say guilty? Why wouldn't you just say now that he's a felon or now that the jury has concluded he's a felon? Why would you say that he was found guilty instead of guilty? Well let me put the hypnotist filter on it. As a hypnotist I was trained that people's choice of words reveals their thoughts and all the time it's really reliable. The choice of the words found guilty instead of just guilty. Now I do understand that found guilty is a common phrase and it wouldn't be surprising to see it used in other contexts. But where you have a choice and they obviously had a choice of any words that would tell the story, why would you put found guilty? Because found guilty has the odor of we know he's not really guilty but it is true that he was found guilty. It suggests that the ABC News person who wrote that post doesn't believe that he was guilty because they're watching the same thing we watched and it was lawfare. So look for that. Look for words that you say to yourself they had a choice of words and within all the words they could have chosen they picked the one that sends a flag. It's sort of a quiet signal.

But is there more? Well as you know, Elie Honig, who is one of the main legal minds on CNN, said the trial blew his mind and it's an unjustified mess. And basically Elie Honig dumped on the lawfare of it exactly as Republicans do. In other words in a purely factual way he just said it's lawfare garbage and it wouldn't have happened to anybody else. Now that's a big deal because he says that on CNN. He said it on his times on CNN and they're not taking him off the air. So CNN, I'm going to give them credit again. They do seem to be pivoting towards something like a reasonable middle. We don't want to get ahead of ourselves and say that it's going to be a completely clean situation, but I see the effort. I mean to me it looks like they're trying. Because remember also Fareed Zakaria said directly that unless your name was Donald Trump you never would have been charged with this crime. Now that is really clear. There's no vagueness in that. Fareed is saying all right, if you look at the situation this is dirty. I mean that's just as clear as you can be.

But it gets better. You know how many times I've told you that Smerconish is the least biased person on CNN? Well true to his brand he had Charlamagne tha God on. You know Charlamagne's doing a book tour. But Charlamagne is also famous for not being pro-Biden at the moment. He's not a lover of Trump but he's very clearly saying Biden's a mess. So Smerconish has him on there and asked if the verdict would change the outcome of the election. And here's what Charlamagne said. He said so it's really which candidate can energize their base and situations like this it does energize Trump's base. I see Biden's base upset with him over a number of things. I do think a situation like this gives them something to fight for, meaning the Trumpers.

Now I saw somebody say that they thought that Smerconish's face and body language suggested that he was going to explode like he didn't like seeing it. I would suggest that you're reading him completely wrong. Smerconish knew exactly what Charlamagne was going to say. I mean not exactly, but he knew what Charlamagne's message was. He invited him on the show. He wasn't surprised. He wanted his audience to hear Charlamagne's point of view. Just think about that. He intentionally invited somebody he knew was going to trash Biden, somebody who's black and is influential. Smerconish did that. Here's what I saw when I looked at Smerconish's face, and this is just subjective, right? But remember I have the perspective that I'm already biased that he's unbiased. The look that I saw on his face was just sort of like shock and amazement like the rest of us. So I think he was just trying to keep a poker face but I think he was having a reaction to it but not the reaction that he hated hearing it. I think it was a reaction of the moment we're in is a big moment.

So what happens when all of those people associated with CNN turn completely on the story and agree with the Republicans? Well they're not the only ones. Alan Dershowitz, a famous Democrat, says Trump was unjustly convicted. This worst case in 60 years should never have been brought and the public should see the judge's outrageous behavior. Now that's pretty clear. Dershowitz is not saying I don't know, you could see this both ways. Nope. One of the most experienced and capable legal minds in the country, a Democrat, said no, this is totally crooked. Totally crooked. Obviously crooked. Every part of this is crooked.

Now I've taught you before that if one of the major networks, let's say CNN or MSNBC, say something is a fact but then you go to the conservative outlets, let's say Breitbart or Fox News, and they say it's not a fact or vice versa, one of them says it's true and the other one says not, it's usually not. Or let me put it a better way, you can't tell if it's true. It's just two versions. Now if you could, you know there's some objective facts that they show you that you can make up your own mind. That's different. But you don't really know if something's true if they disagree in their normal way they disagree. But it's unusual that CNN and Fox News for example would be on the same page about anything. And they're on the same page that this was lawfare and it was a completely rigged system, which is phenomenal.

But here's the best part. Some of you know the name Naval Ravikant, founder of AngelList and one of the most prominent investors and thinkers in Silicon Valley. What you might not know about him is that he's famously non-political, famously does a lot of tweeting. He's one of the most quoted people in philosophy and technology at the moment, success, a lot of different domains. So he's generally considered, I've actually called him the smartest person I've ever met. So let me say that again. The smartest person I've ever met. Do you know how many smart people I've met? Quite a few, right? So and I'll stay with that. You might be the smartest person I've ever met. Now here I'm calling smart not just depth but breadth. He can tell you the better take on more topics than any human being I've ever met and it'll be a different take and it'll be better than one you had on so many different topics. It's crazy.

All right, so when he talks there are enough people, certainly in the investment world, in the technical world, he's well known. So when he says anything that kind of strays from his non-political stance your ears just go wait, what did I just hear? And here's what he said. He put two of Biden's posts on X next to each other. And one of them was about Biden bragging that he ignored the Supreme Court to get student loans cancelled. And then the next one was where he was saying that nobody's above the law after the one where he said he got around the law. So Naval quotes a famous quote from I think some South American dictator type. And he said just this and nothing else. Quote, for my friends everything, for my enemies the law. Now the way that quote is taken is that when he says for my enemies the law he doesn't mean just if they broke the law. That's the important part. He means you can use the law to get rid of enemies and that's just the tool you use. And that is what we are observing.

So now CNN has made it safe for the least political person in all of public life to tell you that the former president of the United States is getting lawed right in front of you. Now to you this might seem like a small deal but I don't think you quite understand how much persuasive influence Naval has on the smartest people in Silicon Valley. He is so respected that when he puts down a stake, and I would say that he put down a stake that this is too far to get him to talk about anything in the political domain and to make a direct statement about it, this is pretty direct, is extraordinary. I think the dam is about to break. I think CNN's already broken. I think the investors in Silicon Valley, they're all going to turn. The All-In podcast is all in. Elon Musk is all in. Naval, he just broke a long tradition and I'm sure he thought about it for a long time before he did it. Something's happening that's bigger than anything you could imagine. It's not obvious yet but wow, you can feel it. That the feeling that things have gone too far is so strong right now. Yeah, the energy is very different.

And here's the part that I was saving for you. Do you know what Judge Merchan's first name is? How many of you know his first name just off the top of your head? Have you ever heard it? His first name is Juan. Yeah, Juan Merchan. That's the judge that's going to jail Trump probably. Do you know where he was born? Colombia. Country of Colombia. Yeah. Judge Merchan was born in Colombia. He's an immigrant. The judge that's judging Trump is an immigrant from below the border. Does that sound like the right choice? The most famous build the wall, keep the South Americans where they are of all time, and his judge is one of the people that would have presumably the biggest problem with that kind of attitude. Gets better. His father was a military officer in Colombia, military officer for a while, and then he later served in Colombia's intelligence services. Huh. Colombia. What do we know about Colombia? What do we know about their military? What do we know about the Colombian intelligence services? Let's see. Some people would say that Colombia and the government and the military are tightly connected with the cartels, some would say. And some would say that the cartels are tightly linked with the American CIA, some would say.

So let me ask you this. If you were the CIA and you knew that Trump didn't even use your services for intelligence and you knew that he was talking about, and other Republicans like Tucker were talking about, eliminating the CIA and all of your jobs and you wanted to stop him, who would be the best pick to do that? Well I would go with Juan Merchan, father military officer from Colombia who once worked in their intelligence services, somehow made it to the United States as an immigrant and built quite a good life. That's who I'd pick. So now I'm not going to make an allegation because I don't know anything about his father. But why does it look exactly like you would think it would look if the worst case scenario were true and that the whole thing is the CIA and is fixed? Why does it look exactly like that? Is that a coincidence? Can we write that off to coincidence that it looks exactly like a CIA operation? Now again I'm only making unfair inferences about people who are known to be the types of people who associate with other types of people. So that's a big, I don't want to go further than that because that would be defamation. So I'm not going to make a claim that I know it's true. I'm just asking. Just asking. Don't you hate that? I'm curious why there's such a big coincidence involved, especially when we know that his selection was supposed to be random but clearly wasn't because he got three Trump cases in a row, all three.

So is it exactly what it looks like? And in the meantime we hear the people who are part of the deep state saying that Merchan is going to recommend jail time despite the fact that nobody would get jail time for this if they were not Trump. And the argument was because Trump was sort of had a bad attitude and violated the gag order so therefore they would send him to jail. That's the argument. And on CNN one of the legal guys was testing that argument out. That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. At the same time there's a movement to change the law so he can't get Secret Service protection while he's in jail so he can be killed.

Now I was talking with one of my online buddies just before I went live and I mentioned that it looked like on the surface it looks like they're trying to kill him. And he didn't understand that I meant that literally. He thought I meant figuratively. No, literally. Now I'm not going to say I know that that's the case. I'm going to say if I were going to put odds on it I'd say it's a 50 percent chance that there's an active plan by our government to kill Trump. I think it's at least a 50 percent chance. And the reason I say that is that we lived through Epstein. If there had never been an Epstein, if there had never been a Kennedy who got assassinated, if we didn't see that RFK Jr. also doesn't get Secret Service protection for no good reason, I would have said okay our government doesn't do things like that. But clearly they do things like that. So yes, they have an existential risk to their jobs if Trump becomes the president again. And what would they do if they are the dirty tricks group of the country? The people who are selected by their willingness to break rules. The CIA is selected by their willingness to do illegal things, at least the operators are, because they're doing illegal things in other countries. You could argue that it's still legal in our country if they do illegal things and it's authorized by our country. But that's sort of cutting it fine. I mean they're basically people who signed up for yeah I'll go do super illegal things, that'll be my job. And that way we would assume that they wouldn't do super illegal things when it's the very group that's been selected because they like to do or at least they're willing to do super illegal things. No, it's at least a 50 percent chance that they're trying to kill him. Don Jr. says the same thing. It's not crazy. It is well within the parameters of what we've seen. If I'd never seen the lawfare happen then I'd say well the courts are fair. No they're not. To me it looks like the court case is driven by the same people who are apparently, if you look at it on the surface, on the surface it looks exactly like a murder plot with a statistical element, which is maybe they don't know for sure he'll be killed in prison but they think there's a good chance. So anyway that's scary.

Over on MSNBC, the stupid network, representative Bowman is on there. He says if you stay home and you do not exercise the power of your vote you're giving your power to white supremacist MAGA individuals. You know where the white supremacist MAGA individuals are because I've never really seen one on the news. But I'm going to take a guess. I think they're up in the mountains with the white supremacist militia that's forming. They're hiding away with the black guy who can't figure out how to get an ID to vote. And well you get it. You get the idea.

Vivek had an interesting legal take. I don't know if I'm buying it yet but it's interesting. He says that Trump can be pardoned by a president for his New York conviction even though it's a state matter. Normally a president can only pardon or commute for something that was a federal offense. You can't do it for a state charge. And Trump was charged and convicted by the state. However the state's charges depended entirely upon the fact that there were also federal violations per their case. So if you were to pardon Trump from the federal part of it it would make the state part of it dissolve because the state part of it depended on the federal part. So even though the federal part was not really what the state found they still relied on the jury thinking a federal thing had been violated so that they could apply the state thing to the higher level crime of felony because it supported the other charge or vice versa. One supported the other. I forget which way it went. But I don't know if I buy that. It sounds right but I feel like there might be an alternative legal theory about whether that's practical. I like the thinking. And once again if it's true, if it's true, how did we get this far and why did Vivek have to be the one to bring it up because he went to a little bit of law school? So he's the only one to have figured it out. Man, do we need him in the government. We need him so much, right? Even if he's wrong on this at least he came up with this and that's pretty good anyway.

So yeah, I do think Vivek is the primary thing that could keep Trump alive if they wanted to be vice president and got nominated for that. Because he's the one that I think the CIA would be most afraid of who not named Trump. So I think he's the way to keep Trump alive. It would be wild if Trump nominated Vivek for vice president and said directly you know what, some other people were my top choice but Vivek will keep me alive. Can you imagine that? Because it was real. It's real. But he could say that directly. You know if Vivek didn't want the job, he wanted to have a different role. I had somebody else in mind but honestly he's the one who's going to keep me alive. I'd love to hear him say that directly.

All right, getting back into the Soros mystery. I asked why is it that Soros is doing what he's doing and I wanted other people to explain it to me like I'm an idiot so I could understand why Soros would be funding so many things that seem disastrous for the country that he lives in. Why would you destroy the country that you live in? Now I'm being called naive and uninformed. And here's what I heard from a user online. That Soros supports anarcho-tyranny, all the things we're seeing in the country, because he believes, now this is the mind-reading part, because he believes in a globalist agenda that transcends national borders. And it wouldn't matter that he's a citizen of the United States because Soros's preference would be that states go away and he'll do fine because he's rich. That ain't it. That ain't it. I feel like this is an analysis that comes from people who have never been rich. May I give you my rich guy analysis? It's the only one you should listen to. Because Soros is rich. If you're not hearing the opinion from somebody also rich, I mean I don't have anything like his money but I've experienced going from poor to being wealthy. It changes you. And here's the thing you want the least if you're on top. So right now he's sitting at the pinnacle of human beings. You don't want that to change. If you're at the top the last thing you want in a risk-reward world, the last thing you want is to change the whole system that you're dominating at the top. That introduces a risk of total collapse that would take him from the top to not the top. It could make every dollar he owns worth nothing, right? So being in the top 1 percent, let me tell you for sure because I'm in it, I don't want the whole system to change dramatically in any way. Now do I think that the whole system should be changed dramatically? Yeah, I can think of lots of ways. But I would want to do them carefully and without changing the general structure of what got me to where I am. The last thing I want is to have the country thrown into chaos and then I have to figure out how to create a good situation from scratch. I'm already in a good situation. If you've never experienced going from uncertainty and economic low income to a place where you would call yourself wealthy, when you get there the last thing you want to do is change the whole world into something you don't even know what will happen. Nobody does that. And among the group of the nobodies who would do that, the top, top, top, the very number one person who wouldn't do that is a person who's famous for being good at risk analysis. That's what Soros is famous for. He's apparently unusually good at risk analysis. Nobody with risk analysis ability destroys the whole system without a replacement. You know that's right. Online nobody does that. So the idea that he's in favor of destroying all the borders and forming a global network is crazy.

Now here's the other thing. If a globalist one-world government were to be formed, have you thought through who would be in charge? That have you lived in the real world at all? If you form a real world government of the top richest people like actually an official government they would just fight with each other. It would be like the Democrats and the Republicans. They would be fighting the fight of all fights when none of them need a fight. All the billionaires are already the champions of the world. They can do whatever they want. They can affect governments easily. Why would they change their situation dramatically? And if they did why do you think Soros would be the top billionaire? Don't you think he would get demoted as likely as promoted? It would be the craziest, riskiest, chaotic thing to ever do if you are already at the top.

The next thing is that people say he's doing it for money. Scott, you don't understand. He destroys countries and then he bets against their currencies and then he makes a whole bunch of money. Now I need a fact check on this but am I crazy or is Soros trying to give away his money? My understanding is he's trying to donate most of it. In the context of trying to give away most of your money you're not doing gigantic terrible illegal things to make more money. It doesn't even make sense. How does any of that make sense? So whatever is going on here I have no idea. I have no idea. I just know that the simplistic explanations of a globalist one-world government don't track at all with who Soros is. And I'm not reading his mind. I'm saying that nobody in that situation would want that choice. Nor have you ever heard anybody. Show me a billionaire who really wants governments to go away and have one world government. I don't think there are any. And definitely not him because he's good at risk management and nobody would do that. It would be crazy anyway. So that's still a mystery.

Let's talk about the Israel peace deal. As I told you on day one it was always fake. So there's not really a peace deal that anybody's going to take too seriously. But it looks like Israel's going to buy some time. I don't know how long it will take to get whatever they need done in Rafah but it's probably a few months. You don't think that they can stall negotiations for two months? Of course they can. Of course they can.

The World Economic Forum is even the more ridiculous theory. Yeah, I think Elon Musk is right about them being a club for rich people. If Elon Musk isn't worried and he's about as close to the inside of the world as anybody could be and he seems totally unconvinced there's any danger there and I agree with him completely. I think it's just a club for rich people.

Meanwhile in Ukraine, Russia's trying to bomb Kharkiv. What is the second biggest city? It's not Kiev. It's Kharkiv. I forget anyway. It looks like the Russians are trying to take out their vital services and depopulate it before they do anything bigger. So it looks like the current method of taking over a city in a military way is the American and Israeli version has a little more boots on the ground. The Russian version is we'll go in when there's nothing left. Kharkiv. Thank you. The city is Kharkiv. Anyway, not much happening there besides the usual badness.

That by the way concludes my comments for today. Sorry I ran long again. I'm going to say bye to YouTube and Rumble and X. I'm going to talk to the good folks on Locals privately, the subscribers. And I'll see the rest of you tomorrow. Hope you enjoyed the show. Bye for now. Locals, hold on.

B d good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and you've never had a better day and let me tell you the Omens are all lining up for an amazing amazing day probably the best you've ever seen now let's see there I am no huh I still don't see the feed all right it would be live that's where it would be there I am we're live well if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their tiny human smooth brains all you need for that is a cup or marker glass or tanker Chell Stein the Cen suar flas us a but kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the immediately of the day thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it's going to happen now ah powering up you know what I feel like I feel so good I feel like an outlaw yeah that's how good I feel how am I feeling felonius yeah felonius it's a great feeling all right let's talk about the news today's Dilbert reborn shows you in the first panel I posted it on X um you can see that I designed it with AI so the first panel of the dilber comic I used AI to tell me some interesting camera angles or perspectives uh for a guy on his computer when a dog walks into the room now ai can't produce my characters because it'll complain about copyright and stuff but it can give me a generic guy and a generic dog and then when I have the angle of all the furniture I just replace them with my characters so you can you can see how that worked out you gave a a new angle that i' had never used before so that's my first I think my first re life world repeatable I'll definitely use it again AI assist to writing my daily comic so it's sort of a a milestone well apparently there's a Tesla deal being worked out to give Elon Musk his money that they gave him and then took away from him the courts took away and uh the only portion that he would be able to use for 5 years is to pay the taxes that he would owe if he were to get it right away so so apparently you can't just take the money and run some people were worried about that uh he'd have to stay there for five years to get his money so should make the stockholders a little bit happy if he has to stay there and work for another five years so we'll see we hope he gets his money um there's a gigantic Wall Street Journal says there a huge cost saving technology for making solar panels now you've heard this story a billion times but this one sounds pretty promising I didn't realize that China can make solar panels at roughly half the price of an American manufacturer uh but with this new technology it should close that Gap a lot and apparently it's not just theoretical it looks like it's you know ready to put into the system yeah I won't get into the technical details but it's a you know it reduces the amount of silver they need makes something thinner than before and um would reduce the cost substantially and I ask you again which one of the climate models takes into account um technical innovations that totally change the curve none because you can't put in a climate model the thing that hasn't been invented yet and yet we know there'll be tons of things invented between now and you know when they imagine the Bur the Earth is going to burn up so if you don't put human invention in your 100-year model is that credible think about how different the world is in any 20year period you know it's the difference between Ai and no AI computers and no computers smartphones and no smartphones 20 years is a long time so these climate models are absurd in leaving out probably the biggest variable I mean you think if you're looking at climate change the biggest variable is the CO2 or the Sun or the ocean but probably the biggest variable is human Innovation it's not even in the model right tell me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure that the models assume that we don't innovate for the rest of humankind we just sort of die all right uh so that's happening uh here's the scariest coolest thing there's a Swiss startup that has made a computer and of brain organoids now I don't know what an organoid is but I'm going to guess it's something like an artificial brain that they built in a Petri dish or a tube or something so I don't think it came from a human I hope you know maybe the cells did or something uh but they now have in the real world apparently you can connect to this thing if you're if you're paying them uh and it consumes a million times less power than regular digital processors and it's fast let me say that again there will be a data center a data center this is already Real by the way this is not speculative this is today functioning there's uh human brain parts that they've somehow connected to a digital interface and they use the human brain part to do the calculating at 1 million times less power than regular stuff do you think there's any way that if it works and it can be reproduced that it does work as so it's already up and running so if it could be reproduced as scale who in the world is going to pay for regular computing when you can have a computer to get a million times less power we are building a human brain SL cyborg the Borg I don't know it it's super cool but also super whoo because you don't know what could go wrong wait a minute how many ways could it go wrong if we start building human brain organoid computers I don't know I I guess a raises questions I'm not afraid of it per se but raises a lot of questions well NASA had to once again delay it's uh an astronaut crude flight of what would be the Boeing starliners I think First Flight with astronauts and I didn't see the reason that the flight was scrubbed but I have a theory it's a bowing Starliner and I think the problem is you know how jur sometimes are sequestered yeah if the jury is going to go home sometimes the judge will say oh you can't go home you have to stay you know away from any influence because you don't want them reading the news they might act differently the jurors if they read the news you want them to stick to just the trial data and I'm starting to think that the uh the astronauts for the boing Starliner maybe they should have been sequestered for the last month to maybe not see any news about Boeing's quality control lately um so I worry that the reason it's delayed is that the astronauts were watching the news and said um I think I've got a cold or something I I'm not sure I can go oh oh my arm so something's going wrong here I I'll never be able to control it maybe you better use the backup I don't know I'm just joking all right did you know that China's labor costs are about double that of Philippines Malaysia India Thailand and Vietnam I'll tell you you think that the United States has trouble you think we have problems we do but how would you like to be China and your entire situation depends on manufacturing because it's the backbone of the economy and your twice as expensive as the Alternatives and everybody has a gigantic incentive to get their business out of there what are they going to do now besides the fact that you know these countries have half the cost and they presumably they're building up some infrastructure so they can be serious competitors to China but I also haven't heard about Mexico I don't know what the cost of Labor is in Mexico compared to China and I also don't know what's going to happen with robots because if we're making these much um much cheaper solar panels and then we get rid of the labor by putting robots in the factories so so you use a manufacturing process that drops the price by I don't know half and then you put in robots that take another 25% off the price or something like that um I tell you that if there's a way to invest in solar um I'm not recommending you invest in it because I don't make I don't make recommendations for Investments but it does seem like maybe there's something that's going to happen here that could be gigantic you don't really think of robots influencing energy except to use it you know they use a lot of energy but they're going to be building the solar panels and the solar plants and the solar everything and probably the uh nuclear power plants too soon all right so there's a story that we don't know what the real story is but Alex Jones is going through something that looks bad now he's saying that the feds came to his door and they were trying to lock him out and take all of his stuff and close him down but he was also acting let's say I'm could to say emotional if if it were somebody I didn't like I would use other words but since I I like him you know he was nice to me he's had me on the show and when somebody's nice to me in person I can't really just go in public and then trash him like it just I'm just not built that way so because I've met him in person and he was very generous to me um I'll I'll say that he's having an emotional reaction that we don't quite understand some people say it's mental health some people say it's substance some people say it's both some people say get an up some people say um and I think his staff has backed him up by the way his staff is on the same P page so it's not just him what whatever is going on his staff seems to have witnessed as well so I don't know who these feds were or what exactly they were trying to do except that it's in the context of everybody who is pro Trump getting a hit so I don't know what's going on but keep an eye on it um he may need some help in any variety of ways we we don't know what the problem is but he's clearly in a crisis situation and so if you you know have any interest in in either his operation or him as a human being um have a little bit of empathy and uh keep an eye on that maybe there's way you can help one way or another all right uh Mexico here here's a story that snuck up on me uh imagine finding this out today this is kind of mindblowing the next president of Mexico is likely to do to be a Jewish woman is this the first time you hearing that I I heard it today so apparently they're having an election the sitting president can't run again they have one-term presidents six years and the the mentor some somebody who's worked closely with the current president so he's recommending her and that's the reason she's getting her her push Claudia shine bomb a Jewish woman with a PhD in Energy Engineering that that's about as perfect as you can get isn't that how would you like to be the president of Mexico you're coming in with a PhD in Energy Engineering but it gets better she's bilingual she used to live in the Bay area she used to live in the Bay Area she's bilingual the current president of Mexico is not bilingual do you think that makes a difference hell yes hell yes language is the big uniter right if you can talk to somebody in the same language it's a whole different experience right you that's how you Bond you don't really bond with Putin if he can't speak your language or she uh but wouldn't it be nice to have somebody we could work with in the same language who's PhD in Energy Engineering now we we all assume that the cartels have undue influence on the governments so there's that but are you also surprised that Mexico would be even considering apparently she's way ahead in the polls it looks like it's a lock um very popular did you see a female president of Mexico coming anytime soon it's it's kind of interesting and impressive and this is the Dei you want you know what I mean th this is diversity done correctly as far as I can tell the only reason she's being considered is that she's overwhelmingly qualified so how about that H how about just being overwhelmingly qualified and then getting the top job okay I'm good with that so at least on paper she looks like exactly the person that America would want that job as well as the Mexicans so maybe something Goods coming out that and there there is talk that Mexico's um going to have an economic boom like you've never seen before because remember the manufacturing is moving toward it that's a good sign and they've got some major infrastructure things like maybe a railroad and some other stuff that will connect the resorts and turn it into more of a a well-engineered destination so all that's happening if the cartels don't derail things um there's something good that could happen now I've said this before but here's what I think is the only hope for living with Mexico I'm seeing somebody mocking me for quote believing in solar let's pretend that you know what you're talking about now did you think I was unaware that there's a waste problem of course there is of course there is am I unaware that people are not good at calculating you know the relative cost and benefits in the future of different technological options I used to do that work I know it can't be done it used to be my job to calculate expenses in the future you can't really do that it was my job but I couldn't do it and nobody can do it so do I think that do I know what the economics of solar power will be next year no I don't you know what but do you know what I do know that the person who is mocking me you don't know no you're an idiot who thinks you know the expenses of Technologies you've never been involved with because you read a article somewhere right I'm smart enough to know that I don't know what will be the competing cost structures 20 years from now which is what you have to think about right it's not what it is today it's if you start a project what does your nuclear power plant cost in 10 years when you're done with it you know what is your solar plant and your gigafactory or your your Giga storage thing what is it cost in 10 or 20 years nobody knows that if if you think you know it dear troll commenter well you're the smartest person in the world according to you because you know what can't be no known good for you did you know about this story about the technology that would lower the cost of solar did you read that this morning before I did all right enough about you uh Tucker Carlson's uh being uh really outspoken uh on his video recently said uh nothing is ever about our safety and that all the big political stuff is you know clearly about the interests of the people in power he said this country in the world only changes when we eliminate the CIA it'll take someone willing to be assassinated he gives examples he said you open the southern border to anyone who wants to come in you're not checking IDs you're not doing any kind of Biometrics you're not even screening for Co so clearly you don't care about my safety check check check correct yes there is no evidence that the people in power of our country are interested in the wellbeing of the citizens there is plenty of evidence the open border that they're operating against against our interests in reason for reasons we don't quite understand I don't understand it we'll talk about more of that later but uh he's saying directly that the CIA has to be cancelled completely I saw ex CIA uh operative agent whatever you want to call them uh also on Tucker show saying that when Trump was the president he didn't use the CIA as much as he used private intelligence people to tell them what was going on why would he do that why would you pay somebody to do the job of the CIA when the CIA is already being paid and therefore it's free you know on a incremental basis why would you do that I can only think of one reason that the president of the United States did not think that the CIA was on the same side as he was in other words Trump the person who knew the most about the CIA while in office had the most access didn't believe that he could trust them with the security of the United States you have to eliminate them under that situation if a sitting president doesn't think they're even on the same side not even on the same side you that's you can't live with that so if you can buy these services on the open market and you don't trust the ones in the government there is an argument for eliminating the CIA and it's strong you know you'd have to hear the other side and I'm not sure they can tell the other side because it'd be full of secrets but is there a surfacy argument that says getting rid of the CIA the most that's a pretty radical thing to do is there an argument for it yeah there is you know there was a time when the CIA was you know overthrowing governments and doing all kinds of things to uh help America control the world and you could have at that time said I don't like America doing all these other things in other countries uh so I don't like the CIA but there would have been a good argument to keep them because the let me let me make the Mak valian power argument here wouldn't it be nice if the United States left all the other countries alone and left them to pursue their best interest for their people until they become thriving democracies and allies of us in the future once they' have used their own free will and their own resources to become an independent country that could be like a strong Ally for us no not in the real world in the real world if we didn't take them over somebody else would have right China would have taken them because whoever has money can control any small entity whether it's a country uh a politician uh or another country yeah any other country so it doesn't take much money to overthrow a country you just bribe the right people and there you go yeah you maybe you could bribe 50 people to overthrow any country and they're probably all bribable so you know the the levers are there for over for controlling other countries but here's my argument the mellan argument for the CIA they might be complete bastards who are doing terrible things to other countries every day but if they didn't what would happen somebody else would and then we would be surrounded by countries that let's say China had a lot of control over that's no good so the thing is that the the worst let's or best let me say the best criminal wins we don't live in a world where there's good versus evil there's just evil versus evil at the government level humans tend to be closer to good you know if you leave them alone they're more likely to be good to each other because we're sort of tribal we grew up that way but countries are evil as soon as you have a country it's probably corrupt no matter who it is uh so maybe the strongest criminal organization is the one you want to be with the strongest criminal organization at the moment America appears to be the strongest criminal organization which might be your safest situation in a historical sense historically you just wanted to be in the strongest country and it didn't matter why they were the strongest right don't you think you were safer being a Roman citizen when Rome was at its peak without supporting that Rome were good guys they weren't good guys but it was probably the safest place to live in those times you know to be a Roman citizen so we're sort of the Roman citizens it feels like to me so yes there's an argument that the CIA works against our interests but I'd like to hear the counterargument I just don't know anybody can make it because you'd have to say what I said yeah we're kind of criminals we do terrible things every single day you wouldn't even want to know what we're doing in your name but it keeps you safer because we're the best criminals that might be the argument and I could be convinced by that I hate it but it's a world in which sometimes your best choice is also terrible don't know all right well but uh the keep in mind that Tucker's father was in the CIA I believe and and he often thinks that um I mean he has a good he has a good window into that world so I take his opinion seriously oh trolls uh being really extra stupid in public is not hurting me it's just amusing me yeah it's just amusing me so thanks say say some more really dumb things about the future of technology to entertain the rest of the commenters they would like to see your stupidity in full flower so say some more irrational things please all right let's talk about the hooc crcy as you know the Biden uh campaign is built entirely on hoaxes from the fine people hoax to the Trump tear Gast peaceful protesters hoax and lot more drinking bleach it's one hoax after another and the Biden Harris headquarters uh X um the X account um said four years ago today Trump tiar guest peaceful protesters outside the White House well it took about a minute before Joel Pollock fact checked them hard and nope that was all debunked by sources that Democrats trust as well as as Republicans so why is it that the campaign can be so blatant about something that's been fact jacked and very clearly didn't happen I mean absolutely did not happen and it's well known their their Their audience is so underinformative course they know it's a lie but they know it works so they're going to say it anyway I'm not so sure I'm not so sure I I think that the Biden Harris campaign is so Dei crippled that the level of incompetence there you can't really assume that it's normal it's probably extraordinary and if you're new to my commentary let me quickly add we're not talking about anybody's genes or culture that's not in the conversation about Dei Dei is a system it's not a person it's not a person it's a system and the system moves people around like little chess players and there aren't enough chess players for what they need to do so they meet their diversity targets whether they have qualified candidates or not because humans always meet the targets that they're measured on and their performances judged upon and that big thing they're judged on so if you assume that Dei as a system is guaranteed to fail because the pipeline of qualified people would be smaller than the demand forcing them to take lesser and lesser qualified people just to meet their diversity goals and if you assume that Democrats don't have an option they have to be diverse it's their brand so they're forced to be diverse but they're demonstrating to the rest of the world through what I would consider the most incompetent administration of all time and the most incompetent campaign and the most incompetent spokesperson and all of those things are permeated with Dei hires which if they were qualified to do their jobs you would see a better job yeah I'm not talking about one thing that I'm criticizing that did there there's a pervasive incompetence in the current government like we've never really seen before and the campaign is so obviously incompetent and they're so obviously backing the wrong guy that um this is sort of a the Biden campaign is basically your Canary in the coal mine for every corporation right they just got to diversity faster because they're so public they really had to companies are also trying to go as fast as they can but you can see what happens when you get to uh Dei diversity goals when you have a a limited pipeline of qualified people again because of systemic racism at the school level just not producing enough diverse candidates so uh yeah the hoax campaign and the Dei uh incompetence uh should bring down the whole house in a few months I I'm expecting a complete um demolition of the Biden campaign I think we're close to the point where the whole thing's just going to come off the rails in a way we've never seen before maybe a whistleblower we'll see I I was watching a body language expert look at the two faces of Biden because that's sort of becoming a thing and the one the one face is his uh Angry troll face that looks like a cat's all puckered up you know You' know look oh his face is all squeezed like all all of his face meets in his nose you one little puckered place and then you see his wide-eyed open vessel so he's got the demon look where he looks demon-possessed and then in the same talk sometimes he'll have the empty vessel where his wde eyes are wide open and his mouth is forming that Hillary Clinton looking at balloons drop and you say to yourself how in the world is that the same person and we still don't know I love the fact that he's clearly two different people I mean I think it's the same organic person but there's something that causes him to be a different personality so much so he doesn't even look the same not even a little bit I mean you can generally recognize as Biden but it's you would think it's is a different person if they stood next to each other so here are the possibilities one is drugs one is mental illness one is some kind of a deep fake thing but I don't think so and one is maybe there's something about editing for example you've seen all the quick edits they've done on his videos could it be that they have to take so much time off between edits that he let takes a nap and just recovers and he wakes up and his eyes are open and he he's the morning version could it be that we're seeing Morning Joe hey Morning Joe get it could it be that when we see Morning Joe he's a little bit uh more lucid and that when we see uh you know evening Joe that he's declined into his dementia yelling puckered face something like that whatever is going on is really bad it's not good whatever it is all right um I can't wait for the first interview with the imaginary Republican who's not going to vote for Trump because the law fair got him have any of you met that person yet I mean I'm I'm being told often and reliably by all the polls that people have decided that since Trump got convicted by a unfair trial that therefore they're not going to vote for him so we're all waiting to see the person right you know where I think that person is I don't know but I think the imaginary Republican who's not going to vote for Trump because of lawfare could be hanging out and partying with the black American voter who didn't know how to get an ID I think they're together cuz we can't find either one of them and I think maybe they're helping each other hide so somewhere maybe in cabins possibly possibly in the mountains uh where the mega supremacists are are gathering their imaginary armies so it could be that the imaginary Mega supremacist army armies that are in the hills are creating a sanctuary for the imaginary Republicans who say they won't vote for Trump but maybe also I'd like to say that they're diverse and that they've included the black Americans who don't who who want to vote and know enough about the world that they think voting makes sense yet can't figure out how to get an ID yeah we know they exist we were told they exist we've never talked to one we've never seen one but the Democrats are quite sure the imaginary Army in the hill and the imaginary Republicans who don't like Trump now and the imaginary guy who can't get an ID they're all real and what about the uh imaginary events that they're running on every part of the Democrat platform is imaginary all the hoaxes are imaginary all the data that they give us about their current performance completely imaginary they say they're controlling the Border everything's fine that's imaginary what about a money that they're spending is Biden spending real money not anymore when you have $35 trillion in debt whatever it is that you're spending is imaginary because who whoever lent it to you they ain't getting it back so we've got an imaginary economy imaginary data we've got real problems that they imagine or not they've got an imaginary Trump who's in in their imagination tried to take over on January 6 and they imagined that he would do it again even though he never did it they think he'll do again the thing he never did once so we have imaginary policies imaginary people imaginary Trump in the future imaginary data do Republicans do that could could you reverse the argument and say oh Scott I see your point but look at all the imaginary things that the uh Republicans believe now maybe you would go after religion if you were not religious you'd say oh they believe in imaginary stuff but is it imaginary to think that your 9-month-old fetus is sort of alive is that imaginary that doesn't seem imaginary you could you could differ on you know what you think about it or what the law should be but it's not imaginary right the debt is not imaginary the lawfare is not imaginary even CNN's analysts are saying it's real so the the here's what I think has happened I think the Democrats uh sort of tiptoed into the imaginary world and it worked because they can control the the press for at least their base they can tell them literally anything and once they realize that you can tell them anything and the actual reality won't make any difference because they also control the fact Checkers they realize that going fully imaginary is a better strategy and I agree by the way it's a better strategy because they don't have anything of substance Trump has substance he can say you see all that crime uh I'm going to do the normal things that people normally do to get less of it is that imaginary I don't think so seems pretty real he says he's going to negotiate with Putin and zalinski to end the war now it might be hard but is it imaginary it's not imaginary and the entire reason we're in Ukraine do you think the government told you the real reason that we're in Ukraine no they gave you an imaginary reason the imaginary reason is that Putin's going to roll up Russia or that Putin's going to roll up Europe if if he gets Ukraine you know with no regard to the fact that some of us know the history of Ukraine and that as Mike Ben can explain better that the whole thing looks like an energy play between two criminal organizations one United States and the other Russia and uh basically it's like we're stealing their their drug stash so we can sell it ourselves their energy that's a better way to look at it so I can't think of anything the Democrats are doing that isn't imaginary because once you realize that your imaginary case will always be stronger than the real world one why would you ever use the real world it's unnecessary they've actually found a way to depart from all reality without paying for it it's free because as long as their press keeps backing them their own people will never go read Breitbart you know the Democrats will never you know go over to Fox News just to see what the other people say although surprisingly Fox News does have a lot of democrat viewers but I feel like they might be conservatives all right let's go on to some more uh this is going to get better as I go by the way I I've uh organized my materials so that I'm going to reach a crescendo so don't leave before the crescendo that'd be crazy all right uh so disgraced da Elvin brag I like I like just using disgraced in front of everything all right um so there there seems to be a whole bunch of trolls on You.

Tube uh all the behavior of social media look suspicious now you that like I don't believe that the trolls are organic anymore at least not during the election season they're they're really active and they're yelling well they're yelling imaginary things so the trolls are literally saying imaginary things about me to try to you know embarrass me on my own live stream let's see who would do that imaginary things what group of people really really really love imaginary stuff it's probably exactly what you think it is all right um so here's something I didn't know about Alvin Bragg he went to Harvard are you telling me that all the times that people have been ripping on Alvin Bragg nobody thought to mock him for having a degree from Harvard come on people improve your game it's not for it's not for me to help you avoid these mistakes no it's funny it's funny you went to Harvard now to be fair um not recently so maybe he went to Harvard back when uh it made a difference what your credentials were if he had just graduated from Harvard I would be saying you know Dei hire because you know Harvard's become ridiculous about their standards but maybe when he was there it was closer to you know he belonged there so I don't know I'm not going to say he didn't belong in Harvard because there was a time when Harvard was at least a little bit credible uh but according to my uh digital um creature from Amazon whose name I don't want to say out loud because I'll trigger it he has a net worth of $41 million but I didn't see that explained do you think it's true so first of all I don't know it's true it's just coming from you know the digital assistant so somebody could have put wrong information on there but is he independently wealthy and how so I guess I would ask for a fact check on that I do not assert that to be true just to be clear I do not assert that it's true but it's on at least one source of information so I'm curious about that did you know that Michigan uh they were looking at a law to make it harder to cheat but the Democrats had the advantage and they passed laws to make it easier to cheat right it's 2024 and in Michigan the state the Democrats unanimously passed legislation that would make it easier to cheat not harder can you think of a reason why they do that do you think they're planning on an imaginary election where you imagine that you knew the results but really you don't well that's what I'd worry about uh that was from the Gateway pundit they're reporting uh also Gateway P pundit is saying that there's some poll of Arab American voters and Biden is way off in his popularity um he had a 60% Arab American vote in 2020 but he's down to about 20% support now I don't think the Arab American Community is big enough that it's going to move the election but wow I think it's one more sign of complete collapse uh I don't think we realize how close the Democrat Party is to Total collapse because until it happens it doesn't look like it's going to happen you know thing nothing happens until something happens so I feel like you know the major tent pole holding up the Democrats is really creaky right now and if that one cracks uh the rest go do you know what the tent pole is that holds up the entire Democrat Party it's the fine people hoax if the fine people hoax can be debunked so that Democrats can see it in a way that's you know credible um that takes everything away and the fact that the Republicans don't go after that you know lot basically just people like me pundits do I never really understood that anyway uh Tim P abruptly cut the his own live stream uh because he had Laura lumer as a guest and Laura lomer was talking about you know getting getting back at Democrats and that there was enough crime there that if you know Trump got back in office there would be a number of people who should be dealt with with the legal process however I think her rhetoric um reached a point where Tim P's entire show was probably at risk if he didn't pull it down himself so I'm going to give Tim p a big a big compliment nicely done nicely done so I'll tell you in softer words what Laura ler said so that I also don't get cancelled all right so Laura lumer said that the the level of the uh criminal Behavior Uh consistent with the the laws on the books for treason uh might go to the level of the death penalty now here's the problem if you were to say hey people might be guilty of certain crimes here's why we think they are uh the penalty for that could be the death penalty it should be on the table that's okay because you're just talking about the law here's what I think is too far and let's see if you would have spotted it because Tim P did so he's good at this right um if you say let's get a list of names of people and then before you've tried them you say we want to kill these people then you sort of become Alvin Bragg yourself you hear what I'm saying you don't want to start with the person and then talk about the death penalty unless you've really had a lot of conversations and in a court case that's you know credible about those charges but it's real dangerous to go full fonny Willis and or who was it Leticia James and say you're you know you're running for office to get Trump that's too far somehow she's not paying for that but it's way too far so Tim P I think very smartly and very um decisively said oh shoot she just gave You.

Tube a predicate to cancel my whole Channel and I'm not going to die on this hill it wasn't even my opinion this was a guest's opinion so nice move nice move Tim P because the information still gets out you know the social media picks it up but he reduces his risk on You.

Tube and he lives to fight again totally respect for that nicely played good good uh decision-making um and uh I don't think you could have played that better and you know I don't mind that Laura lommer has her opinion so it's not about her opinion I think that part was fine it's just you don't want to give You.

Tube you know this fresh bash of of red meat to cancel you because you know they want to you know they want to cancel Tim pool so well played um Jonathan Turley still you know National Treasure talking about any of the legal elements of politics so he talks about the fact that uh you know the the whole situation where the government or the Republicans we trying to get a hold of the audio that they only have the transcript of of Biden doing his testimony to her it's you are and of course the Democrats say Hey you have the transcript that's good enough and then the Republicans say yeah but we don't trust the transcript we think you might have edited it and it might be way worse than the transcript shows and we have a right to know because if Biden is not capable um it's got to be 25th amendment situation so they definitely have a right to know I I completely support their attempt to get that but listen to according to turle uh the justice department is making a new claim for why they can't release the audio of something they've already released the transcript to can you think of any reason why you wouldn't release the audio when they've willing and already and publicly and everybody's seeing it the transcript what reason could there be other than it sounds really terrible like really bad it must be awful just guessing but listen to one of the arguments that they just profer uh they say uh that the audio tape must be withheld this is from Jonathan Turley uh due to the risk that it could be altered by artificial intelligence and passed off as an authentic in a deep fake release quote the passage of time and advancements in audio artificial intelligence and deep fake Technologies only amplify concerns about malicious manipulation of audio files wouldn't that apply to everything that anybody has on audio I I feel like that is such a a stretch such a stretch that it's almost just laughable but I'm going to surprise you it's not a terrible argument like it it strikes you as immediately absurd I me that's how it struck me but let me let me support it as best I can it's somewhat rare that you would have a situation where there's an audio only because that's easier to De fake if if it had been something he' said in public it'd be easy to debunk it because you'd say okay here's the real one he said this in public now you can see how the Deep fake changed it but since the only public thing we'd have is an audio that nobody listens to if somebody were to take a clip out of it and you know do a the 10-second clip where it sounds like he said the NW or something ridiculous then I think people would believe it I do cuz if the headline story said the audio tape is out and then you saw a clip and then you played it and you heard what you thought was Biden's voice and he sounded really dementia ridden and crazy and you know saying racist stuff and whatever you might believe it and we're close enough to the election where a fake audio tape could actually change things remember the audio tape of trump saying grab them by the people thought that was going to change the election it turns out it didn't but is it a realistic risk that when you're this close to an election and it's the president who's running for reelection and it's Audio Only it is actually an unusually big risk wouldn't you agree because I think somebody would alter it immediately that it's not even a risk it would happen it it would happen I I think you could say with complete confidence that there would be at least a parody version which people would think was real at the very least it would be a parody version where he where he's just saying crazy stuff so I don't think this should be upheld because if you generalize this it would be devastating to the normal operation of the world but it's not crazy it's not crazy that it opens the door to a a bad thing happening but let me let me suggest this and I think the people asking for it will say the same thing we already have the transcript and we already have a zillion hours of Biden talking on audio and other places AI doesn't need the specific audio from the event all you have to do is run the transcript through it on a voice that's trained as Biden and then if that works you go back in and you edit the transcript and feed back into AI again so instead of saying the real transcript in Biden's voice it adds H and you know nword or some crazy thing so I feel as if maybe the lawyers make making this ask don't understand how AI Works did they not understand that whether we have the transcript or not or whether we have the audio or not it actually doesn't have any effect on whether somebody would make a deep fake yeah the the the def fect that they're worried about could be made tomorrow based on what's already publicly available with no research whatsoever you know just Google transcript and yeah actually you don't even have to have the transcript because if you're going to do a fake one you can make up the transcript nobody's going to check see the the trouble with Fakes is that they do their damage before they're debunked and the debunk never gets the attention of the original so there's nothing that you couldn't do right now to fake that um okay so Trump went to the UFC yesterday got a standing ovation it was crazy do you know what that standing ovation at the UFC sounded like to me well if he just heard it on the surface it sounded like Yay Trump yay but here's what I heard we'll take the outlaw did you see the crowd almost all men well I mean dominant male audience the men there were very clearly by their reaction saying Outlaw you just made him better there's almost nothing you could have done to Trump that would have been as good for his brand than becoming an outlaw to the to the Crooked government honestly I love it my honest opinion without the spin you know it's the spin season so even I as much as I try to avoid spinning you know everybody's going to do it this this season but honestly you like in my body and my real mind no spin I just love that he's an outlaw because the way he got there you know if he'd robbed the bank I'd say no but the way he got there oh yeah yeah I want the outlaw absolutely positively no qualms about it give me the outlaw and that's what the UFC audience basically said in their own way but it gets better after UFC fighter Kevin Holland won he uh jumped over the ring and went right to president Trump former president Trump and shook his hands and said some private words to him in support obviously Trump you know slapped him on the shoulders and obviously they're now friends uh you should know that UFC fighter Kevin Holland is black does it matter yes yep because it's public and people are very affected by social uh forces so if you see a a uh black Superstar um going right to president Trump and congratulating him that's powerful yeah a lot of Clips on it likewise uh UFC fighter Sean Strickland um said on the microphone to the crowd president Trump you're the man it is a damn travesty what they're doing to you I'll be donating to you I'll be donating to you is the key phrase um by the way I don't know if you have the current data but in the 48 hours after the uh felony conviction verdict um Trump had already earned $1.6 million per felony per felony yeah and if you do the math you know people say he's not really a good business person but by my calculations he invested $130,000 and he got a return of 53 million that's some good investing you know he doesn't get credit for that so yeah it's a 1.6 million per felony uh his his per indictment numbers are not as good but but I think they'll be improving as well so um I think we should be measuring Trump's uh his uh donation Gathering by felonies so if he could get I feel like he's only maybe 12 to 17 felonies away from having all the money he needs for the rest of the campaign so I think we're like three or four felonies away from being really rich with cash so there's that um Trump also at the UFC announced that he's uh getting on Tik Tock now you might know that I think that Tik Tock needs to be cancelled or D divested into the US um but as long as it's there I I guess I gotta agree with vake and with Trump if it's there and it matters and it's a big way to reach voters sure why not all right David saaks and others are pointing out the lawfare double standard here that H Hillary Clinton did similar things without penalty so here's how David saaks explains it uh he calls it the business records double standard in 2016 Hillary Clinton's campaign was fined $8,000 that was it a fine of $8,000 for the following for violating Federal campaign Finance laws huh why her team falsely reported the funding of the steel dossier as legal services and legal and compliance Consulting well what does that sound like huh this sounds exactly like what Trump did exactly what else do we know um according to Sachs actually this opposition research was an attempt to smear her opponent with false and cacious salacious allegations obviously it was also intended to influence the election huh so she recorded it as a lawyer expense but really no matter what she was thinking because as Megan Kelly explained on her uh video the other day that it doesn't matter what anybody was thinking when they did the expense it only matters that a reasonable person could look at and say well there's more than one reason you would do that so when when Trump did his uh his uh payments um it didn't matter that he was thinking it was mostly about the election this is Megan Kelly's take uh it had more to do with the fact that a reasonable person would say well there's more than one reason you would want that information not to get out you know one's your family one's your business reputation and the other is political so if everybody agrees that there were three reasons that should have been reason enough that he can't be convicted you need one reason if there's three it's just sort of automatically you're not you're not guilty so uh Hillary obviously was putting this into legal expenses to hide her uh to hide her contribution to the hoax of course moreover says sax Hillary's campaign was headquartered in New York state huh and of Brooklyn New York which would make it fall under the jurisdiction of New York penal law 1751 the state law which makes it a felony to falsify business records with the intent to conceal the commission of a crime huh I feel like that steel dossier thing was a crime wasn't it it should have been I don't know maybe it wasn't technically but should have been um and then the saxs asks what the key distinction between Hillary's campaign violation versus recent news um and he concludes with Hillary's violation there wasn't a Manhattan prosecutor politically motivated to bring an unprecedented case to trial now as you know people who in the past may have um leaned left in their politics like Elon Musk and I'm not sure where David sa saxs was but he's you know clearly in the uh anti-biden train at the moment so you see some people that you wouldn't expect to be anti-biden who are clearly anti-biden but uh let's look at the rest of them because it's a growing thing and I think the Dam's about to burst ABC news says this in a post like any other American found guilty of a crime Donald Trump is likely to face uh new restrictions and lose a number of Rights new due to his Newfound felon status what about this choice of words found guilty of a crime isn't that an interesting phrase he was found guilty why wouldn't you just say guilty why wouldn't you just say now that he's a felon or now that the jury has concluded he's a felon why would you say that he was found guilty instead of guilty well let me put the hypnotist filter on it as as a hypnotist um I was trained that people's choice of words reveals their thoughts uh and all the time it's really reliable the choice of the words found guilty instead of just guilty now I do understand that found guilty is a common phrase and it wouldn't be surprising to see it used in other context but where you have a choice and they obviously had a choice of any words that wouldn't tell the story why would you put found guilty because found guilty has the odor of we know he's not really guilty but it is true that he was found guilty it it suggests that the ABC News person who wrote that post doesn't believe that he was guilty because they're watching the same thing we watched and it was lawfare so look for that look for words that you say to yourself they had a choice of words and within all the words they could have chose chosen they picked the one that sends a flag it's sort of a quite a signal but is there more well as you know Eli hon who one of the main legal Minds on CNN um said the trial blew his mind and it's an unjustified mess and basically he uh Eli honig dumped on the lawfare of it exactly as Republicans do in other words in a purely factual way he just said it's law fair garbage and it wouldn't have happened to anybody else now that's a big deal because he says that on CNN he said his times on CNN and they're not taking him off the air so CNN I'm going to give them credit again um they do seem to be pivoting towards something like a reasonable middle we don't want to get ahead of ourselves and say that you know it's going to be a completely clean situation but I see the effort I mean to me it looks like they're trying because remember also fared Zakaria said directly that unless your name was Donald Trump you never would have been charged with this crime now that is really clear there's no vagueness in that fed is saying all right if you look at the situation this is dirty I mean that's just that's as clear as you can be but it gets better uh you know how many times I've told you that sanes is the least biased person on CNN well true to his brand he had Charlamagne the God on you know charlamagne's doing a book tour and uh but Charlamagne is also famous for not being pro Biden at the moment you know he's not a lover of trump but he's very clearly saying you know Biden's a mess so SM smes has him on there and uh asked if the verdict would change the outcome of the election and here's what Charline said he said so it's really which candidate can energize their base and situations like this it does energize Trump's base I see Biden's base upset with him over a number of things I do think a situation like this gives them something to fight for meaning the the trumpers um now I saw somebody say that they thought that smes' face and body language suggested that he was going to explode like he didn't like seeing it I would suggest that you're reading him completely wrong smires knew exactly what Charlemagne was going to say I mean not exactly but he he knew what Charlemagne's message was he invited him on the show no he wasn't surprised he wanted his audience to hear Charlemagne's point of view just think about that he intentionally invited somebody he knew was going to trash Biden somebody who's black and is influential smir did that here's what I saw when I looked at Smur knish's face and this is just subjective right but remember I I have the perspective that I'm already biased that he's unbiased the look that I saw on his face was just sort of like shock and amazement like the rest of us so I think he was just trying to keep a poker face but I think he was having a reaction to it but not the reaction that you know he hated hearing it I think it was a reaction of the moment we're in is a big moment so what happens when all of those people associated with CNN turn completely on the story and agree with the Republicans well they're not the only ones Ellen dtz a famous Democrat says Trump was unjustly convicted this worst case in 60 years should never been brought and the public should see the judge's outrageous behavior now that's pretty clear dtz is not saying I don't know you could see this both ways nope one of the most experienced and capable legal Minds in the country a Democrat said no this is totally crooked totally crooked obviously crooked every part of this is crooked now I've taught you before that if one of the major networks let's say CNN or MSNBC say something is a fact but then you go to the conservative Outlets let's say breitbard or Fox News and they say it's not a fact or vice versa one of them says it's true and the other one says not it's usually not usually not so or or let me put it a better way you can't tell if it's true it's just two versions now if you could you know there's some objective facts that they show you that you can make up your own mind that's different but you don't really know if something's true if they disagree in their normal way they disagree but it's unusual that CNN and Fox News for example would be on the same page about anything and they're on the same page that this was lawfare and it was completely rigged system which is phenomenal but here's the best part um some of you know uh the name Naval ravikant founder of angelist and one of the most uh prominent investor and thinkers in Silicon Valley what you might not know about him is that he's famously non-political famously does a lot of tweeting um you know he's one of the most quoted people in uh in well most quoted people in philosophy and Technology at the moment success lot of lot of different domains so he's generally considered I've actually call them the smartest person I've ever met so let me say that again the smartest person I've ever met do you know how many smart people I've met quite a few right so and I'll stay with that you might be the smartest person I've ever met now here I'm I'm calling smart not just depth but breadth he he can he can tell you the better take on more to topics than any human being I've ever met and it'll be a different take and it'll be better than one you had on so many different topics it's crazy all right so when he talks there are enough people certainly in the investment world in the in the technical World he's well known so when he says anything that kind of Strays from his non-political stance your ears just go wait what did I just hear and here's what he said he put two of Biden's uh posts on next next to each other and one of them was about Biden bragging that he ignored the Supreme Court to get um student loans cancelled and then the next one was where he was saying that nobody's Above the Law after the one where he said he got around the law so naal quotes a famous quote from I think some South American dictator type and he and he said just this and nothing else quote for my friends everything for my enemies the law now the way that quote is taken is that when he says for my enemies the law he doesn't mean just if they broke the law that's the important part he means you can use the law to get rid of enemies and that's just the tool you use and uh that is what we are observing so now CNN has made it safe for the least political person in all of public life to tell you that the former president of the United States is getting lawed right in front of you now to you this might seem like a small deal but I don't think you quite understand how much um how much persuasive influence Nal has on the smartest people in Silicon Valley he he is so respected that when he puts down a stake and I would say that he put down a stake that this is too far to get him to talk about anything in the political domain and to make a direct statement about it this is pretty direct is extraordinary I think the dam is about to break I think CNN's already broken I think the the investors in Silicon Valley they're all going to turn the Allin podcast is Allin Elon Musk he's Allin nval he just broke a long tradition and and that I I'm I'm sure he thought about it for a long time before he did it something's happening that's bigger than anything you could imagine it it's not obvious yet but wow you can feel it that there the the feeling that things have gone too far is so strong right now yeah the energy is very different and here's the part that uh I was saving for you do you know what judge M's first name is how many of you know his first name just off the top of your head have you ever heard it his first name is Juan yeah Juan Muran that's the judge that's going to jail Trump probably do you know where he was born Colombia country of Colombia yeah judge judge michan was born in Columbia he's an immigrant the judge that's judging Trump is an immigrant from below the Border does that sound like the right choice the most famous build the wall keep the South Americans where they are of all time and his judge is one of the people that would have you know presumably the biggest problem with that kind of attitude gets better uh his father was a military officer in Colombia military officer for a while and then he later served in Colombia's intelligence Services huh colia what do we know about Colombia what do we know about their military what do we know about the Colombian intelligence Services let's see some people would say that Colombia and the government and the military are tightly connected with the cartels some would say and some would say that the cartels are tightly linked with the American CIA some would say so let me ask you this if you were the CIA and you knew that Trump didn't even use your services for intelligence and you knew that he was talking about and other Republicans like Tucker were talking about eliminating the CIA and all of your jobs and you wanted to stop him who would be the best pick to do that well I would go with Juan meran father military officer from Colombia who once worked in their intelligence Services somehow made it to the United States as an immigrant and build quite a good life that's who I'd pick so now I'm not going to make an allegation because I don't know anything about his father but why does it look exactly like you would think it would look if the worst case scenario were true and that the whole thing is the CIA and S fixed why why does it look exactly like that is that a coincidence can can we write that off to coincidence that it looks exactly like a CIA operation now again I'm only making unfair inferences about people who are known to be the types of people who associate with other types of people so that's a big you know I don't I don't want to go further than that because that would be defamation so I'm not going to make a claim that I know it's true I'm just asking just asking don't you hate that I'm curious why there's such a big coincidence involved especially when we know that his selection was supposed to be random but clearly wasn't because he got three Trump cases in a row all three so is it exactly what it looks like and in the meantime we hear the people who are uh part of the deep State saying that he's Merchant is going to recommend jail time despite the fact that nobody would get jail time for this if they were not Trump and the argument was because Trump was sort of uh had a bad attitude and violated the gag order so therefore they would send him to jail the that's the argument and and that and on CNN one of the legal guys was testing that argument out that's the most absurd thing I've ever heard at the same time there's a movement to change the law so he can't get secret service protection while he's in jail so he can be killed now uh I was talking with one of my online buddies just before I went live and you know I mentioned that it it looked like on the surface it looks like they're trying to kill him and he didn't understand that I meant that literally he thought I meant figuratively no literally now I'm not going to say I know that that's the case I'm going to say if I were going to put odds on it I'd say it's a 50% chance that there's an active plan by our government to kill Trump I think it's at least a 50% chance and the reason I say that is that we live through Epstein if there had never been an Ste if there had never been a Kennedy who got assassinated if we didn't see that RFK Jr also doesn't get secret service protection for no good reason I would have said okay our government doesn't do things like that but clearly they do things like that so yes they they have an existential risk well to their jobs uh if Trump becomes the president again and what would they do if they are the dirty tricks group of the country the people who are selected by their willingness to break rules the CIA is selected by their willingness to do illegal things at least the operators are because they're doing illegal things in other countries uh uh you could argue that it's still legal in our country if they do illegal things and it's authorized by our country but that's sort of that's sort of cutting it fine I mean they're basically people who signed up for yeah I'll go do super illegal things that'll be my job and that way we would assume that they wouldn't do super illegal things when it's the very group that's been selected because they like to do or at least they're willing to do super illegal things no it's at least a 50% chance that they're trying to kill him Don JR says the same thing it's not crazy it is well within the parameters of what we've seen if I'd never seen the laware happen then I'd say well you know but the courts are fair no they're not to me it looks like the court case is driven by the same people who are apparently if you look at it on the surface on the surface it looks exactly like a murder plot with a statistical element which is maybe they don't know for sure he'll be killed in prison but they think there's a good chance so anyway that's scary um so uh over on MSNBC The the stupid Network representative Bowman's on there he says if you stay home and you do not exercise the power your vote you're giving your power to white supremacist Mega individuals you know where the white supremacist Mega individuals are because I I've never really seen one on the news but I'm I'm going to take a guess I think they're up in the mountains with the white supremacist militia that's forming they're hiding away with the black guy who can't figure out how to get an Ida to vote and well you get it you get the idea um V had an interesting legal take I don't know if I'm buying it yet but it's interesting um he says that Trump can be pardoned by a president uh for his New York conviction even though it's a state matter normally uh a president can only uh what would be uh pardon or commute for something that was a federal offense you can't do it for a state charge and and Trump was charged and convicted by the state however the state's charges depended entirely upon the fact that there were also Federal violations per their case so if you were to uh pardon Trump from the federal part of it it would make the state part of it dissolve because the state part of it depended on the federal part so even though the federal part was not really what the state found they still relied on the jury thinking a federal thing had been violated so that they could apply the state thing to the higher level crime of felony because it supported the other charge or vice versa one supported the other I forget which way it went but I don't know if I buy that I I it sounds right but I feel like there might be an alternative legal theory about whether that's practical I like the thinking and once again if it's true if it's true how did we get this far and why did V have to be the one to bring it up because he went to a little bit of law school so so he's the only one have figured it out man do we need him in the in the government we need him so much right even if he's wrong on this at least he came up with this and that's pretty good anyway so the um yeah I do think V is the primary thing that could keep Trump alive if if they wanted to be vice president and got nominated for that so because he's the one that I think the CIA would be most afraid of who not named Trump so I think he's the way to keep Trump alive um it would be wild if Trump nominated V for vice president and said directly you know what some other people were my top choice but the V will keep me alive can you imagine that cuz it was real it's real but he could say that directly you know if a didn't want the job he wanted to have a different role uh I had somebody else in mind but honestly he's the one who's going to keep me alive I'd love to hear him say that directly all right getting back into the Soros mystery uh I asked why is it that Soros is doing what he's doing and I wanted other people to explain it to me like I'm an idiot so I could understand why Soros would be funding so many things that seem like disastrous for the country that he lives in right why would you destroy the country that you live in now I I'm being called naive and uninformed and here's what I heard uh from a user online that Soros supports anarco tyranny all the things we're seeing in the country because he believes now this is the mind reading part because he believes in a globalist agenda that transcends National borders uh and it wouldn't matter that he's a citizen of the United States because soros's preference would be that states go away and he'll he'll do fine because he's Rich that ain't it that ain't it I I feel like this is an analysis that comes from people who have never been Rich may I give you my rich guy analysis it's the only one you should listen to Because Soros is Rich if you're not hearing the opinion from somebody also rich I mean I don't have anything like his money but I've experienced going from poor to to being wealthy it changes you and here's the thing you want the least if you're if you're on top so right now he's sitting at like the Pinnacle of human beings you don't want that to change if you're at the top the last thing you want in a risk reward world the last thing you want is to change the whole system that you're dominating at at the top that introduces a risk of total collapse that would take him from the top to not the top it could make every dollar he owns worth nothing right so being in the top 1% let me tell you for sure because I'm in it I don't want the whole system to change dramatically in any way now do I think that the whole system should be changed dramatically yeah I can think of lots of ways but I would want to do them care and without changing the general structure of what got me to where I am the last thing I want is to have the country thrown into chaos and then I have to figure out how to you know create a good situation from scratch I'm already in a good situation if you've never experienced going from uncertainty and economic you know low income to a place where you would call yourself wealthy when you get there the last thing you want to do is change the whole world into something you don't even know what will happen nobody does that and among the group of the nobodies who would do that the top top top the very number one person who wouldn't do that is a person who's famous for being good at risk analysis that's what Soros is famous for he's apparently unusually good at risk analysis nobody with risk analysis ability destroys the whole system without a replacement you know that's right online Nobody Does that so the idea that he's in in favor of you know destroying all the borders and forming a global network is crazy now here's the other thing if a globalist One World Government were to be formed have you thought through who would be in charge that have you lived in the real world at all if you form a real world government of the you know top richest person people like actually an official government they would just fight with each other it would be like the Democrats and the Republicans they they would be buying the fight of all fights when none of them need a fight all the billionaires are already the champions of the world they can do whatever they want they can affect governments easily why would they change their situation dramatically and if they did why do you think Soros would be the you know like top billionaire don't you think he would get demoted as likely as promoted it would be the craziest riskiest chaotic thing to ever do if you are already at the top the next thing is that people say he's doing it for money Scott you don't understand you know he destroys countries and then he bets against their currencies and then he makes a whole bunch of money money now I need a fact check on this but am I crazy or is Soros trying to give away his money my understanding is he's trying to donate most of it in the context of trying to give away most of your money you're not doing gigantic terrible illegal things to make more money like it doesn't even make sense like how does that any of that make sense so whatever is going on here I have no idea I have no idea I just know that the simplistic explanations of a globalist One World Government don't track at all with who Soros is and I and I'm not reading his mind I'm saying that nobody in that situation would want that choice nor have you ever heard anybody show me show me a um show me a billionaire who really wants uh governments to go away and have one world government I I don't think there are any and definitely not him because he's good at risk management and nobody would nobody would do that it would be crazy anyway so that's still a mystery let's talk about the Israel peace deal uh as I told you on day one it was always fake so there's not there's not really a peace deal that anybody's going to take too seriously but it looks like Israel's going to buy some time I don't know how long it will take to get whatever they need done in Rafa but it's probably a few months you don't think that they can stall negotiations for two months of course they can of course they can yeah the world economic forum is even the more ridiculous Theory yeah I think Elon Musk is right about them being a club for rich people uh if if Elon Musk isn't worried and he's about as close to the inside of the the world as anybody could be and he seems totally uncon you know unconvinced there's any danger there and I agree with him completely I think it's just a club for rich people meanwhile in Ukraine Russia's trying to uh they say bomb Kira what is the second biggest city it's not Kev it's uh kir kirov or something I forget anyway it looks like the Russians are trying to take out their vital services and depopulate it before they do anything bigger so it looks like the current method of taking over a city in a military way is the American and Israeli version as a little more boots on the ground the Russian version is H we'll go in when there's nothing left car carco kov thank you the city is kov kov kov or kov one of those anyway not much happening there besides the usual Badness that by the way concludes my comments for today sorry I ran long again I'm going to say bye to uh You.

Tube and Rumble and X I'm going to talk to the good folks on locals privately the subscri and uh I'll see the rest of you tomorrow hope you enjoyed the show bye for now locals hold on coming to you e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e but

[Music]

[Music]

B

[Music]

[Music]

d

good morning everybody and welcome to

the highlight of human

civilization it's called coffee with

Scott Adams and you've never had a

better day and let me tell you the Omens

are all lining up for an amazing amazing

day probably the best you've ever

seen now let's see there I

am no

huh I still don't see the feed all right

it would be live that's where it would

be there I

am we're

live well if you'd like to take your

experience up to levels that nobody can

understand with their tiny human smooth

brains all you need for that is a cup or

marker glass or tanker Chell Stein the

Cen suar flas us a but kind fill it with

your favorite liquid I like coffee and

join me now for the unparallel pleasure

of the immediately of the day thing that

makes everything better it's called the

simultaneous Sip and it's going to

happen

now ah powering up you know what I feel

like I feel so

good I feel like an

outlaw yeah that's how good I

feel how am I feeling

felonius yeah

felonius it's a great

feeling all right let's talk about the

news today's Dilbert reborn shows you in

the first panel I posted it on X um you

can see that I designed it with AI so

the first panel of the dilber comic I

used AI to tell me some interesting

camera angles or perspectives

uh for a guy on his computer when a dog

walks into the room now ai can't produce

my characters because it'll complain

about copyright and stuff but it can

give me a generic guy and a generic dog

and then when I have the angle of all

the furniture I just replace them with

my

characters so you can you can see how

that worked out you gave a a new angle

that i' had never used

before so that's my first I think my

first re life world repeatable I'll

definitely use it again AI assist to

writing my daily comic so it's sort of a

a

milestone well apparently there's a

Tesla deal being worked out to give Elon

Musk his money that they gave him and

then took away from him the courts took

away and uh the only portion that he

would be able to use for 5 years is to

pay the taxes that he would owe if he

were to get it right away so so

apparently you can't just take the money

and run some people were worried about

that uh he'd have to stay there for five

years to get his money so should make

the stockholders a little bit happy if

he has to stay there and work for

another five

years so we'll see we hope he gets his

money um there's a gigantic Wall Street

Journal says there a huge cost saving

technology for making solar panels now

you've heard this story a billion times

but this one sounds pretty promising I

didn't realize that China can make solar

panels at roughly half the price of an

American

manufacturer uh but with this new

technology it should close that Gap a

lot and apparently it's not just

theoretical it looks like it's you know

ready to put into the system yeah I

won't get into the technical details but

it's a you know it reduces the amount of

silver they need makes something thinner

than before and um would reduce the cost

substantially and I ask you again which

one of the climate models takes into

account um technical innovations that

totally change the curve none because

you can't put in a climate model the

thing that hasn't been invented yet and

yet we know there'll be tons of things

invented between now and you know when

they imagine the Bur the Earth is going

to burn up so if you don't put human

invention in your 100-year

model is that

credible think about how different the

world is in any 20year period you know

it's the difference between Ai and no AI

computers and no computers smartphones

and no

smartphones 20 years is a long time so

these climate models are absurd in

leaving out probably the biggest

variable

I mean you think if you're looking at

climate change the biggest variable is

the CO2 or the Sun or the

ocean but probably the biggest variable

is human Innovation it's not even in the

model right tell me if I'm wrong but I'm

pretty sure that the models assume that

we don't innovate for the rest of

humankind we just sort of

die all right uh so that's happening

uh here's the scariest coolest thing

there's a Swiss startup that has made a

computer and of brain

organoids now I don't know what an

organoid is but I'm going to guess it's

something like an artificial brain that

they built in a Petri dish or a tube or

something so I don't think it came from

a human I

hope you know maybe the cells did or

something uh but they now have in the

real world apparently you can connect to

this thing if you're if you're paying

them uh and it consumes a million times

less power than regular digital

processors and it's

fast let me say that

again there will be a data center a data

center this is already Real by the way

this is not speculative this is

today

functioning there's uh human brain parts

that they've somehow connected to a

digital interface and they use the human

brain part to do the calculating at 1

million times less power than regular

stuff do you think there's any way that

if it works and it can be reproduced

that it does work as so it's already up

and running so if it could be

reproduced as scale who in the world is

going to pay for regular computing when

you can have a computer to get a million

times less

power we are

building a human brain SL

cyborg the Borg I don't

know it it's super cool but also super

whoo because you don't know what could

go wrong wait a minute how many ways

could it go wrong if we start building

human brain organoid computers I don't

know I I guess a raises questions I'm

not afraid of it per se but raises a lot

of questions well NASA had to once again

delay it's uh an astronaut crude flight

of what would be the Boeing starliners I

think First Flight with

astronauts and I didn't see the reason

that the flight was scrubbed but I have

a

theory it's a bowing

Starliner and I think the problem is you

know how jur

sometimes are

sequestered yeah if the jury is going to

go home sometimes the judge will say oh

you can't go home you have to stay you

know away from any influence because you

don't want them reading the news they

might act differently the jurors if they

read the news you want them to stick to

just the trial

data and I'm starting to think that the

uh the astronauts for the boing

Starliner maybe they should have been

sequestered for the last month to maybe

not see any news about Boeing's quality

control

lately um so I worry that the reason

it's delayed is that the astronauts were

watching the news and said um I think

I've got a cold or something I I'm not

sure I can go oh oh my arm so

something's going wrong here I I'll

never be able to control it maybe you

better use the backup I don't know I'm

just

joking all right did you know that

China's labor costs are about double

that of Philippines Malaysia India

Thailand and

Vietnam I'll tell you you think that the

United States has trouble you think we

have problems we

do but how would you like to be China

and your entire situation depends on

manufacturing because it's the backbone

of the economy and your twice as

expensive as the

Alternatives and everybody has a

gigantic incentive to get their business

out of

there what are they going to

do now besides the fact that you know

these countries have half the cost and

they presumably they're building up some

infrastructure so they can be serious

competitors to China but I also haven't

heard about

Mexico I don't know what the cost of

Labor is in Mexico compared to China and

I also don't know what's going to happen

with

robots because if we're making these

much um much cheaper solar panels and

then we get rid of the labor by putting

robots in the factories so so you use a

manufacturing process that drops the

price by I don't know half and then you

put in robots that take another 25% off

the price or something like that

um I tell you that if there's a way to

invest in

solar um I'm not recommending you invest

in it because I don't make I don't make

recommendations for Investments but it

does seem like maybe there's something

that's going to happen here that could

be gigantic you don't really think of

robots influencing energy except to use

it you know they use a lot of energy but

they're going to be building the solar

panels and the solar plants and the

solar everything and probably the uh

nuclear power plants too soon all right

so there's a story that we don't know

what the real story is but Alex Jones is

going through something that looks bad

now he's saying that the feds came to

his door and they were trying to lock

him out and take all of his stuff and

close him down but he was also acting

let's say I'm could to say

emotional if if it were somebody I

didn't like I would use other words

but since I I like him you know he was

nice to me he's had me on the show and

when somebody's nice to me in person I

can't really just go in public and then

trash him like it just I'm just not

built that way so because I've met him

in person and he was very generous to me

um I'll I'll say that he's having an

emotional reaction that we don't quite

understand some people say it's mental

health some people say it's substance

some people say it's both some people

say get an up some people say um and I

think his staff has backed him up by the

way his staff is on the same P page so

it's not just him what whatever is going

on his staff seems to have witnessed as

well so I don't know who these feds were

or what exactly they were trying to do

except that it's in the context of

everybody who is pro Trump getting a hit

so I don't know what's going on but keep

an eye on it um he may need some help in

any variety of ways we we don't know

what the problem is but he's clearly in

a crisis

situation and so if you you know have

any interest

in in either his operation or him as a

human being um have a little bit of

empathy and uh keep an eye on that maybe

there's way you can help one way or

another all

right uh Mexico here here's a story that

snuck up on

me uh imagine finding this out today

this is kind of

mindblowing the next president of Mexico

is likely to do to be a Jewish

woman is this the first time you hearing

that I I heard it today so apparently

they're having an

election the sitting president can't run

again they have one-term presidents six

years and the the mentor some somebody

who's worked closely with the current

president so he's recommending her and

that's the reason she's getting her her

push Claudia shine bomb a Jewish woman

with a PhD in Energy

Engineering that that's about as perfect

as you can get isn't

that how would you like to be the

president of Mexico you're coming in

with a PhD in Energy

Engineering but it gets better she's

bilingual she used to live in the Bay

area she used to live in the Bay Area

she's

bilingual the current president of

Mexico is not bilingual do you think

that makes a

difference hell

yes hell yes language is the big

uniter right if you can talk to somebody

in the same language it's a whole

different experience right you that's

how you Bond you don't really bond with

Putin if he can't speak your language

or she uh but wouldn't it be nice to

have somebody we could work with in the

same language who's PhD in Energy

Engineering now we we all assume that

the cartels have undue influence on the

governments so there's that but are you

also surprised that Mexico would be even

considering apparently she's way ahead

in the polls it looks like it's a lock

um very popular

did you see a female president of Mexico

coming anytime

soon it's it's kind of interesting and

impressive and this is the Dei you

want you know what I mean th this is

diversity done

correctly as far as I can tell the only

reason she's being considered is that

she's overwhelmingly

qualified so how about that

H how about just being overwhelmingly

qualified and then getting the top job

okay I'm good with that so at least on

paper she looks like exactly the person

that America would want that job as well

as the Mexicans so maybe something Goods

coming out that and there there is talk

that Mexico's um going to have an

economic boom like you've never seen

before because remember the

manufacturing is moving toward it that's

a good sign and they've got some major

infrastructure things like maybe a

railroad and some other stuff that will

connect the resorts and turn it into

more of a a well-engineered

destination so all that's happening if

the cartels don't derail things um

there's something good that could happen

now I've said this before but here's

what I think is the only hope for living

with Mexico

I'm seeing somebody mocking me for quote

believing in

solar let's pretend that you know what

you're talking about now did you think I

was unaware that there's a waste problem

of course there is of course there is am

I unaware that people are not good at

calculating you know the relative cost

and benefits in the future of different

technological options

I used to do that work I know it can't

be done it used to be my job to

calculate expenses in the future you

can't really do that it was my job but I

couldn't do it and nobody can do it so

do I think that do I know what the

economics of solar power will be next

year no I don't you know what but do you

know what I do

know that the person who is mocking me

you don't

know no you're an idiot who thinks you

know the expenses of Technologies you've

never been involved with because you

read a article

somewhere right I'm smart enough to know

that I don't know what will be the

competing cost structures 20 years from

now which is what you have to think

about right it's not what it is today

it's if you start a project what does

your nuclear power plant cost in 10

years when you're done with it you know

what is your solar plant and your

gigafactory or your your Giga storage

thing what is it cost in 10 or 20 years

nobody knows

that if if you think you know it dear

troll commenter well you're the smartest

person in the world according to you

because you know what can't be no known

good for you did you know about this

story about the technology that would

lower the cost of solar did you read

that this morning before I

did all right enough about you

uh Tucker Carlson's uh being uh really

outspoken uh on his video recently said

uh nothing is ever about our safety and

that all the big political stuff is you

know clearly about the interests of the

people in power he said this country in

the world only changes when we eliminate

the

CIA it'll take someone willing to be

assassinated he gives examples he said

you open the southern border to anyone

who wants to come in you're not checking

IDs you're not doing any kind of

Biometrics you're not even screening for

Co so clearly you don't care about my

safety check check check correct yes

there is no evidence that the people in

power of our country are interested in

the wellbeing of the citizens there is

plenty of evidence the open border that

they're operating against against our

interests in reason for reasons we don't

quite

understand I don't understand it we'll

talk about more of that later but uh

he's saying directly that the CIA has to

be cancelled completely I saw ex CIA uh

operative agent whatever you want to

call them uh also on Tucker show saying

that when Trump was the president he

didn't use the CIA as much as he used

private intelligence people to tell them

what was going on why would he do that

why would you pay somebody to do the job

of the CIA when the CIA is already being

paid and therefore it's

free you know on a incremental basis why

would you do that I can only think of

one reason that the president of the

United States did not think that the CIA

was on the same side as he was in other

words Trump the person who knew the most

about the CIA while in office had the

most access didn't believe that he could

trust them with the security of the

United

States you have to eliminate them under

that

situation if a sitting president doesn't

think they're even on the same

side not even on the same

side you that's you can't live with that

so if you can buy these services on the

open market and you don't trust the ones

in the

government there is an argument for

eliminating the CIA and it's strong you

know you'd have to hear the other side

and I'm not sure they can tell the other

side because it'd be full of secrets but

is there a surfacy argument that says

getting rid of the CIA the most that's a

pretty radical thing to do is there an

argument for it yeah there is you know

there was a time when the CIA was you

know overthrowing governments and doing

all kinds of things to uh help America

control the world and you could have at

that time said I don't like America

doing all these other things in other

countries uh so I don't like the

CIA but there would have been a good

argument to keep them because the let me

let me make the Mak valian power

argument

here wouldn't it be nice if the United

States left all the other countries

alone and left them to pursue their best

interest for their people until they

become thriving democracies and allies

of us in the future once they' have used

their own free will and their own

resources to become an independent

country that could be like a strong Ally

for us no not in the real world in the

real world if we didn't take them over

somebody else would have right China

would have taken them because whoever

has money can control any small entity

whether it's a

country uh a

politician uh or another country yeah

any other country so it doesn't take

much money to overthrow a country you

just bribe the right people and there

you go yeah you maybe you could bribe 50

people to overthrow any

country and they're probably all

bribable so you know the the levers are

there for over for controlling other

countries but here's my argument the

mellan argument for the

CIA they might be complete bastards who

are doing terrible things to other

countries every day but if they didn't

what would happen somebody else would

and then we would be surrounded by

countries that let's say China had a lot

of control over that's no good

so the thing is that the the worst let's

or best let me say the best criminal

wins we don't live in a world where

there's good versus evil there's just

evil versus evil at the government level

humans tend to be closer to good you

know if you leave them alone they're

more likely to be good to each other

because we're sort of tribal we grew up

that way but countries are evil as soon

as you have a country it's probably

corrupt no matter who it is uh so

maybe the strongest criminal

organization is the one you want to be

with the strongest criminal organization

at the moment America appears to be the

strongest criminal

organization which might be your safest

situation in a historical sense

historically you just wanted to be in

the strongest country and it didn't

matter why they were the strongest right

don't you think you were safer being a

Roman citizen when Rome was at its

peak without supporting that Rome were

good guys they weren't good guys but it

was probably the safest place to live in

those times you know to be a Roman

citizen so we're sort of the Roman

citizens it feels like to me so yes

there's an argument that the CIA works

against our interests but I'd like to

hear the

counterargument I just don't know

anybody can make it because you'd have

to say what I said yeah we're kind of

criminals we do terrible things every

single day

you wouldn't even want to know what

we're doing in your name but it keeps

you safer because we're the best

criminals that might be the argument and

I could be convinced by that I hate it

but it's a world in which sometimes your

best choice is also

terrible don't

know all right well but uh the keep in

mind that Tucker's father was in the CIA

I

believe and and he often thinks

that um I mean he has a good he has a

good window into that world so I take

his opinion

seriously oh

trolls uh being really extra stupid in

public is not hurting

me it's just amusing

me yeah it's just amusing me so thanks

say say some more really dumb things

about the future of technology to

entertain the rest of the commenters

they would like to see your stupidity in

full

flower so say some more irrational

things

please all right let's talk about the

hooc crcy as you know the Biden uh

campaign is built entirely on hoaxes

from the fine people hoax to the Trump

tear Gast peaceful protesters hoax and

lot more drinking bleach it's one hoax

after

another and the Biden Harris

headquarters uh X um the X account um

said four years ago today Trump tiar

guest peaceful protesters outside the

White House well it took about a minute

before Joel Pollock fact checked them

hard and nope that was all debunked by

sources that Democrats trust as well as

as Republicans

so why is it that the campaign

can be so blatant about something that's

been fact jacked and very clearly didn't

happen I mean absolutely did not happen

and it's well known their their Their

audience is so

underinformative

course they know it's a lie

but they know it works so they're going

to say it anyway I'm not so

sure I'm not so sure I I think that the

Biden Harris campaign is so Dei

crippled that the level of incompetence

there you can't really assume that it's

normal it's probably

extraordinary and if you're new to my

commentary let me quickly add we're not

talking about anybody's genes or culture

that's not in the conversation about Dei

Dei is a system it's not a

person it's not a person it's a system

and the

system moves people around like little

chess players and there aren't enough

chess players for what they need to do

so they meet their diversity targets

whether they have qualified candidates

or not because humans always meet the

targets that they're measured on and

their performances judged upon and that

big thing they're judged on so if you

assume that Dei as a system is

guaranteed to fail because the pipeline

of qualified people would be smaller

than the demand forcing them to take

lesser and lesser qualified people just

to meet their diversity

goals and if you assume that Democrats

don't have an option they have to be

diverse it's their brand so they're

forced to be diverse but they're

demonstrating to the rest of the world

through what I would consider the most

incompetent administration of all time

and the most incompetent campaign and

the most incompetent

spokesperson and all of those things are

permeated with Dei

hires which if they were qualified to do

their jobs you would see a better job

yeah I'm not talking about one thing

that I'm criticizing that did there

there's a pervasive incompetence in the

current government like we've never

really seen before and the campaign is

so obviously incompetent and they're so

obviously backing the wrong guy that um

this is sort of a the Biden campaign is

basically your Canary in the coal mine

for every

corporation right they just got to

diversity faster because they're so

public they really had to companies are

also trying to go as fast as they can

but you can see what happens when you

get to uh

Dei diversity goals when you have a a

limited pipeline of qualified people

again because of systemic racism at the

school level just not producing enough

diverse

candidates

so uh yeah the hoax campaign and the Dei

uh

incompetence uh should bring down the

whole house in a few months

I I'm expecting a complete um demolition

of the Biden

campaign I think we're close to the

point where the whole thing's just going

to come off the rails in a way we've

never seen

before maybe a whistleblower we'll see I

I was watching a body language expert

look at the two faces of Biden because

that's sort of becoming a

thing and the one the one face is his uh

Angry troll face that looks like a cat's

all puckered up you know You'

know look oh his face is all squeezed

like all all of his face meets in his

nose you one little puckered place and

then you see his wide-eyed open vessel

so he's got the demon look where he

looks demon-possessed and then in the

same talk sometimes he'll have the empty

vessel where his wde eyes are wide open

and his mouth is forming that Hillary

Clinton looking at balloons drop

and you say to yourself how in the world

is that the same person and we still

don't

know I love the fact that he's clearly

two different people I mean I think it's

the same organic person but there's

something that causes him to be a

different personality so much so he

doesn't even look the same not even a

little bit I mean you can generally

recognize as Biden but it's you would

think it's is a different person if they

stood next to each other so here are the

possibilities one is

drugs one is mental

illness one is some kind of a deep fake

thing but I don't think

so and one is maybe there's something

about

editing for example you've seen all the

quick edits they've done on his videos

could it be that they have to take so

much time off between edits that he let

takes a nap and just recovers and he

wakes up and his eyes are open and he

he's the morning version could it be

that we're seeing Morning Joe hey

Morning Joe get it could it be that when

we see Morning Joe he's a little bit uh

more

lucid and that when we see uh you know

evening Joe that he's declined into his

dementia yelling puckered face something

like that whatever is going on is really

bad it's not

good whatever it

is all right um I can't wait for the

first interview with the imaginary

Republican who's not going to vote for

Trump because the law fair got

him have any of you met that person yet

I mean I'm I'm being

told often and reliably by all the polls

that people have decided that since

Trump got convicted by a unfair trial

that therefore they're not going to vote

for

him so we're all waiting to see the

person right you know where I think that

person

is I don't know but I think the

imaginary Republican who's not going to

vote for Trump because of lawfare could

be hanging out and partying with the

black American voter who didn't know how

to get an

ID I think they're together cuz we can't

find either one of them and I think

maybe they're helping each other hide so

somewhere maybe in cabins possibly

possibly in the mountains uh where the

mega supremacists are are gathering

their imaginary armies so it could be

that the imaginary Mega supremacist army

armies that are in the hills are

creating a sanctuary for the imaginary

Republicans who say they won't vote for

Trump but maybe also I'd like to say

that they're diverse and that they've

included the black Americans who don't

who who want to vote and know enough

about the world that they think voting

makes sense yet can't figure out how to

get an

ID yeah we know they exist we were told

they exist we've never talked to one

we've never seen one but the Democrats

are quite sure the imaginary Army in the

hill and the imaginary Republicans who

don't like Trump now and the imaginary

guy who can't get an ID they're all

real and what about the uh imaginary

events that they're running

on every part of the Democrat platform

is

imaginary all the hoaxes are

imaginary all the data that they give us

about their current performance

completely

imaginary they say they're controlling

the Border everything's fine that's

imaginary what about a money that

they're spending

is Biden spending real

money not anymore when you have $35

trillion in debt whatever it is that

you're

spending is

imaginary because who whoever lent it to

you they ain't getting it

back so we've got an imaginary

economy imaginary

data we've got real problems that they

imagine or

not they've got an imaginary Trump who's

in in their imagination tried to take

over on January 6 and they imagined that

he would do it again even though he

never did it they think he'll do again

the thing he never did

once so we have imaginary policies

imaginary people imaginary Trump in the

future imaginary

data do Republicans do

that could could you reverse the

argument and say oh Scott I see your

point but look at all the imaginary

things that the uh Republicans

believe now maybe you would go after

religion if you were not religious you'd

say oh they believe in imaginary stuff

but is it imaginary to think that your

9-month-old

fetus is sort of

alive is that

imaginary that doesn't seem imaginary

you could you could differ on you know

what you think about it or what the law

should be but it's not

imaginary right the debt is not

imaginary the lawfare is not imaginary

even CNN's analysts are saying it's

real so the the here's what I think has

happened I think the Democrats uh sort

of tiptoed into the imaginary world and

it

worked because they can control the the

press for at least their base they can

tell them literally anything and once

they realize that you can tell them

anything and the actual reality won't

make any difference because they also

control the fact Checkers they realize

that going fully imaginary is a better

strategy and I agree by the way it's a

better strategy because they don't have

anything of

substance Trump has

substance he can say you see all that

crime uh I'm going to do the normal

things that people normally do to get

less of it is that imaginary I don't

think so seems pretty real he says he's

going to negotiate with Putin and

zalinski to end the war now it might be

hard but is it

imaginary it's not

imaginary and the entire reason we're in

Ukraine do you think the government told

you the real reason that we're in

Ukraine no they gave you an imaginary

reason the imaginary reason is that

Putin's going to roll up Russia or that

Putin's going to roll up Europe if if he

gets Ukraine you know with no regard to

the fact that some of us know the

history of Ukraine and that as Mike Ben

can explain better that the whole thing

looks like an energy play between two

criminal organizations one United States

and the other Russia and uh basically

it's like we're stealing their their

drug stash so we can sell it ourselves

their energy that's a better way to look

at it so I can't think of anything the

Democrats are doing that isn't imaginary

because once you realize that your

imaginary case will always be stronger

than the real world one why would you

ever use the real world it's unnecessary

they've actually found a way to depart

from all

reality without paying for it it's free

because as long as their press keeps

backing them their own people will never

go read

Breitbart you know the Democrats will

never you know go over to Fox News just

to see what the other people say

although surprisingly Fox News does have

a lot of democrat viewers but I feel

like they might be

conservatives all right let's go on to

some more uh this is going to get better

as I go by the way I I've uh organized

my materials so that I'm going to reach

a crescendo so don't leave before the

crescendo that'd be crazy all right uh

so disgraced da Elvin brag I like I like

just using disgraced in front of

everything all right

um so there there seems to be a whole

bunch of trolls on

YouTube uh all the behavior of social

media look suspicious

now you that like I don't believe that

the trolls are organic anymore at least

not during the election season they're

they're really active and they're

yelling well they're yelling imaginary

things so the trolls are literally

saying imaginary things about me to try

to you know embarrass me on my own live

stream let's see who would do that

imaginary things what group of

people really really really love

imaginary

stuff it's probably exactly what you

think it is all right um so here's

something I didn't know about Alvin

Bragg he went to

Harvard are you telling me that all the

times that people have been ripping on

Alvin Bragg nobody thought to mock him

for having a degree from

Harvard come on people improve your game

it's not for it's not for me to help you

avoid these mistakes no it's funny it's

funny you went to Harvard now to be

fair um not

recently so maybe he went to Harvard

back when uh it made a difference what

your credentials

were if he had just graduated from

Harvard I would be saying you know Dei

hire because you know Harvard's become

ridiculous about their standards but

maybe when he was there it was closer to

you know he belonged there so I don't

know I'm not going to say he didn't

belong in Harvard because there was a

time when Harvard was at least a little

bit

credible uh but according to my uh

digital um creature from Amazon whose

name I don't want to say out loud

because I'll trigger it he has a net

worth of $41

million but I didn't see that explained

do you think it's true so first of all I

don't know it's true it's just coming

from you know the digital assistant so

somebody could have put wrong

information on there but is he

independently

wealthy and how so I guess I would ask

for a fact check on that I do not assert

that to be true just to be clear I do

not assert that it's

true but it's on at least one source of

information so I'm curious about

that did you know that Michigan uh they

were looking at a law to make it harder

to cheat but the Democrats had the

advantage and they passed laws to make

it easier to

cheat right it's

2024 and in Michigan the state the

Democrats unanimously passed legislation

that would make it easier to cheat not

harder can you think of a reason why

they do

that do you think they're planning on an

imaginary

election where you imagine that you knew

the results but really you

don't well that's what I'd worry about

uh that was from the Gateway pundit

they're

reporting uh also Gateway P pundit is

saying that there's some poll of Arab

American voters and Biden is way off in

his

popularity um

he had a 60% Arab American vote in 2020

but he's down to about 20% support now I

don't think the Arab

American Community is big enough that

it's going to move the

election but wow I think it's one more

sign of complete

collapse uh I don't think we realize how

close the Democrat Party is to Total

collapse because until it happens it

doesn't look like it's going to happen

you know thing nothing happens until

something happens so I feel like you

know the major tent pole holding up the

Democrats is really creaky right now and

if that one cracks uh the rest go do you

know what the tent pole is that holds up

the entire Democrat

Party it's the fine people

hoax if the fine people hoax can be

debunked so that Democrats can see it in

a way that's you know credible

um that takes everything away and the

fact that the Republicans don't go after

that you know lot basically just people

like me pundits do I never really

understood that anyway uh Tim P abruptly

cut the his own live

stream uh because he had Laura lumer as

a guest and Laura lomer was talking

about you know getting getting back at

Democrats and that there was enough

crime there that if you know Trump got

back in office there would be a number

of people who should be dealt with with

the legal process however I think her

rhetoric

um reached a point where Tim P's entire

show was probably at risk if he didn't

pull it down

himself so I'm going to give Tim p a

big a big

compliment nicely done

nicely done so I'll tell you in softer

words what Laura ler said so that I also

don't get cancelled all right so Laura

lumer said that the the level of the uh

criminal

Behavior Uh consistent with the the laws

on the books for

treason uh might go to the level of the

death

penalty now here's the problem if you

were to say hey people might be guilty

of certain crimes here's why we think

they are uh the penalty for that could

be the death penalty it should be on the

table that's okay because you're just

talking about the law here's what I

think is too far and let's see if you

would have spotted it because Tim P did

so he's good at this

right um if you say let's get a list of

names of people and then before you've

tried them you say we want to kill these

people then you sort of become Alvin

Bragg

yourself you hear what I'm saying you

don't want to start with the person and

then talk about the death penalty unless

you've really had a lot of conversations

and in a court case that's you know

credible about those charges but it's

real dangerous to go full fonny Willis

and or who was it Leticia James and say

you're you know you're running for

office to get

Trump that's too far somehow she's not

paying for that but it's way too far so

Tim P I think very

smartly and very um

decisively said oh shoot she just gave

YouTube a predicate to cancel my whole

Channel and I'm not going to die on this

hill it wasn't even my opinion this was

a guest's opinion so nice move

nice move Tim P because the information

still gets out you know the social media

picks it up but he reduces his risk on

YouTube and he lives to fight

again totally respect for that nicely

played good good uh

decision-making um and uh I don't think

you could have played that better and

you know I don't mind that Laura lommer

has her opinion so it's not about her

opinion I think that part was fine it's

just you don't want to give YouTube you

know this fresh bash of of red meat to

cancel you because you know they want to

you know they want to cancel Tim pool so

well

played um Jonathan Turley still you know

National Treasure talking about any of

the legal elements of politics so he

talks about the fact that uh you know

the the whole situation where the

government or the Republicans we trying

to get a hold of the

audio that they only have the transcript

of of Biden doing his testimony to her

it's you are

and of course the Democrats say Hey you

have the transcript that's good enough

and then the Republicans say yeah but we

don't trust the transcript we think you

might have edited it and it might be way

worse than the transcript shows and we

have a right to know because if Biden is

not

capable um it's got to be 25th amendment

situation so they definitely have a

right to know I I completely support

their attempt to get that but listen to

according to turle uh the justice

department is making a new claim for why

they can't release the audio of

something they've already released the

transcript to can you think of any

reason why you wouldn't release the

audio when they've willing and already

and publicly and everybody's seeing it

the

transcript what reason could there be

other than it sounds really terrible

like really bad it must be

awful just guessing but listen to one of

the arguments that they just profer uh

they say uh that the audio tape must be

withheld this is from Jonathan Turley uh

due to the risk that it could be altered

by artificial intelligence and passed

off as an authentic in a deep fake

release

quote the passage of time and

advancements in audio artificial

intelligence and deep fake Technologies

only amplify concerns about malicious

manipulation of audio

files wouldn't that apply to everything

that anybody

has on

audio I I feel like that is such a a

stretch such a

stretch that it's almost just

laughable but I'm going to surprise you

it's not a terrible

argument like it it strikes you as

immediately absurd I me that's how it

struck me but let me let me support it

as best I

can it's somewhat rare that you would

have a situation where there's an audio

only because that's easier to De fake if

if it had been something he' said in

public it'd be easy to debunk it because

you'd say okay here's the real one he

said this in public now you can see how

the Deep fake changed it but since the

only public thing we'd have is an audio

that nobody listens to if somebody were

to take a clip out of it and you know do

a the 10-second clip where it sounds

like he said the NW or something

ridiculous then I think people would

believe it I do cuz if the headline

story said the audio tape is out and

then you saw a clip and then you played

it and you heard what you thought was

Biden's voice and he sounded really

dementia ridden and crazy and you know

saying racist stuff and

whatever you might believe it and we're

close enough to the election where a

fake audio tape could

actually change things remember the

audio tape of trump saying grab them by

the people thought that was going

to change the election it turns out it

didn't but is it a realistic risk that

when you're this close to an election

and it's the president who's running for

reelection and it's Audio

Only it is actually an unusually big

risk wouldn't you

agree because I think somebody would

alter it immediately that it's not even

a risk it would happen it it would

happen I I think you could say with

complete confidence that there would be

at least a parody version which people

would think was real at the very least

it would be a parody

version where he where he's just saying

crazy stuff so I don't think this should

be upheld because if you generalize this

it would be devastating to the normal

operation of the world but it's not

crazy it's not crazy that it opens the

door to a a bad thing happening but let

me let me suggest this and I think the

people asking for it will say the same

thing we already have the transcript and

we already have a zillion hours of Biden

talking on audio and other

places AI doesn't need the specific

audio from the event all you have to do

is run the transcript through it on a

voice that's trained as Biden and then

if that works you go back in and you

edit the transcript and feed back into

AI again so instead of saying the real

transcript in Biden's voice it adds H

and you know nword or some crazy thing

so I feel as if maybe the lawyers make

making this ask don't understand how AI

Works did they not understand that

whether we have the transcript or not or

whether we have the audio or not it

actually doesn't have any effect on

whether somebody would make a deep fake

yeah the the the def fect that they're

worried about could be made tomorrow

based on what's already publicly

available with no research whatsoever

you know just Google transcript and yeah

actually you don't even have to have the

transcript because if you're going to do

a fake one you can make up the

transcript nobody's going to check see

the the trouble with Fakes is that they

do their damage before they're debunked

and the debunk never gets the attention

of the original

so there's nothing that you couldn't do

right now to fake

that

um okay so Trump went to the UFC

yesterday got a standing ovation it was

crazy do you know what that standing

ovation at the UFC sounded like to me

well if he just heard it on the surface

it sounded like Yay Trump yay but here's

what I heard

we'll take the

outlaw did you see the

crowd almost all men well I mean

dominant male audience the men there

were very clearly by their reaction

saying Outlaw you just made him

better there's almost nothing you could

have done to

Trump that would have been as good for

his brand than becoming an outlaw to the

to the Crooked

government honestly I love

it my honest opinion without the spin

you know it's the spin season so even I

as much as I try to avoid spinning you

know everybody's going to do it this

this season but honestly you like in my

body and my real mind no

spin I just love that he's an outlaw

because the way he got there you know if

he'd robbed the bank I'd say no but the

way he got there oh

yeah yeah I want the outlaw absolutely

positively no qualms about it give me

the outlaw and that's what the UFC

audience basically said in their own

way but it gets better after UFC fighter

Kevin Holland won he uh jumped over the

ring and went right to president Trump

former president Trump and shook his

hands and said some private words to him

in support obviously Trump you know

slapped him on the shoulders and

obviously they're now friends uh you

should know that UFC fighter Kevin

Holland is black does it matter yes yep

because it's public and people are very

affected by social uh forces so if you

see a a uh black

Superstar um going right to president

Trump and congratulating

him that's powerful yeah a lot of Clips

on it likewise uh UFC fighter Sean

Strickland um said on the microphone to

the crowd president Trump you're the man

it is a damn travesty what they're doing

to you I'll be donating to you I'll be

donating to you is the key phrase

um by the way I don't know if you have

the current data but in the 48 hours

after the uh felony conviction

verdict um Trump had already earned $1.6

million per

felony per felony yeah and if you do the

math you know people say he's not really

a good business person but by my

calculations he invested

$130,000 and he got a return of 53

million that's some good investing you

know he doesn't get credit for that so

yeah it's a 1.6 million per felony uh

his his per indictment numbers are not

as good but but I think they'll be

improving as well so um I think we

should be measuring Trump's uh his uh

donation Gathering by felonies so if he

could get I feel like he's only maybe 12

to 17 felonies away from having all the

money he needs for the rest of the

campaign so I think we're like three or

four felonies away from being really

rich with

cash so there's

that um Trump also at the UFC announced

that he's uh getting on Tik Tock now you

might know that I think that Tik Tock

needs to be cancelled or D divested into

the US um

but as long as it's

there I I guess I gotta agree with vake

and with Trump if it's

there and it matters and it's a big way

to reach

voters sure why

not all

right David saaks and others are

pointing out the lawfare double standard

here that H Hillary Clinton did similar

things without penalty so here's how

David saaks explains it

uh he calls it the business records

double standard in 2016 Hillary

Clinton's campaign was fined

$8,000 that was it a fine of $8,000 for

the following for violating Federal

campaign Finance laws huh why her team

falsely reported the funding of the

steel dossier as legal services and

legal and compliance

Consulting well what does that sound

like huh this sounds exactly like what

Trump did exactly

what else do we know um according to

Sachs actually this opposition research

was an attempt to smear her opponent

with false and cacious salacious

allegations obviously it was also

intended to influence the election huh

so she recorded it

as a lawyer expense but

really no matter what she was thinking

because as Megan Kelly explained on her

uh video the other day that it doesn't

matter what anybody was thinking when

they did the expense it only matters

that a reasonable person could look at

and say well there's more than one

reason you would do

that so

when when Trump did his uh his uh

payments um it didn't matter that he was

thinking it was mostly about the

election this is Megan Kelly's take uh

it had more to do with the fact that a

reasonable person would say well there's

more than one reason you would want that

information not to get out you know

one's your family one's your business

reputation and the other is political so

if everybody agrees that there were

three reasons that should have been

reason enough that he can't be convicted

you need one

reason if there's three it's just sort

of automatically you're not you're not

guilty so uh Hillary obviously was

putting this into legal expenses to hide

her uh to hide her

contribution to the hoax of course

moreover says sax Hillary's campaign was

headquartered in New York state huh and

of Brooklyn New York which would make it

fall under the jurisdiction of New York

penal law 1751 the state law which makes

it a felony to falsify business records

with the intent to conceal the

commission of a

crime huh I feel like that steel dossier

thing was a crime

wasn't it it should have been I don't

know maybe it wasn't technically but

should have

been um and then the saxs asks what the

key distinction between Hillary's

campaign violation versus recent

news um and he concludes with Hillary's

violation there wasn't a Manhattan

prosecutor politically motivated to

bring an unprecedented case to trial now

as you know people who in the past may

have um leaned left in their politics

like Elon Musk and I'm not sure where

David sa saxs was but he's you know

clearly in the uh anti-biden train at

the moment so you see some people that

you wouldn't expect to be anti-biden who

are clearly anti-biden but uh let's look

at the rest of them because it's a

growing thing and I think the Dam's

about to burst

ABC news says this in a post like any

other American found guilty of a crime

Donald Trump is likely to face uh new

restrictions and lose a number of Rights

new due to his Newfound felon

status what about this choice of

words found guilty of a crime isn't that

an interesting phrase he was found

guilty why wouldn't you just say guilty

why wouldn't you just say now that he's

a

felon or now that the jury has concluded

he's a

felon why would you say that he was

found guilty instead of

guilty well let me put the hypnotist

filter on it as as a

hypnotist um I was trained that people's

choice of words reveals their

thoughts uh and all the time it's really

reliable

the choice of the words found guilty

instead of just guilty now I do

understand that found guilty is a common

phrase and it wouldn't be surprising to

see it used in other context but where

you have a choice and they obviously had

a choice of any words that wouldn't tell

the story why would you put found

guilty because found guilty has the odor

of we know he's not really guilty but it

is true that he was found guilty

it it suggests that the ABC News person

who wrote that post doesn't believe that

he was guilty because they're watching

the same thing we watched and it was

lawfare so look for that look for words

that you say to yourself they had a

choice of words and within all the words

they could have chose chosen they picked

the one that sends a flag it's sort of a

quite a signal but is there more well as

you know Eli hon who one of the main

legal Minds on CNN um said the trial

blew his mind and it's an unjustified

mess and basically he uh Eli honig

dumped on the lawfare of it exactly as

Republicans do in other words in a

purely factual way he just said it's law

fair garbage and it wouldn't have

happened to anybody else now that's a

big deal because he says that on CNN he

said his times on CNN and they're not

taking him off the air so CNN I'm going

to give them credit again um they do

seem to be pivoting towards something

like a reasonable middle we don't want

to get ahead of ourselves and say that

you know it's going to be a completely

clean situation but I see the

effort I mean to me it looks like

they're

trying because remember also

fared Zakaria said

directly that unless your name was

Donald Trump you never would have been

charged with this crime now that is

really clear there's no vagueness in

that fed is saying all right if you look

at the situation this is dirty I mean

that's just that's as clear as you can

be but it gets better uh you know how

many times I've told you that sanes is

the least biased person on

CNN well true to his brand he had

Charlamagne the God on you know

charlamagne's doing a book tour and uh

but Charlamagne is also famous for not

being pro Biden at the moment you know

he's not a lover of trump but he's very

clearly saying you know Biden's a mess

so SM smes has him on there and uh asked

if the verdict would change the outcome

of the election and here's what Charline

said he said so it's really which

candidate can energize their base and

situations like this it does energize

Trump's base I see Biden's base upset

with him over a number of things I do

think a situation like this gives them

something to fight for meaning the the

trumpers um now I saw somebody say that

they thought that smes' face and body

language suggested that he was going to

explode like he didn't like seeing it I

would suggest that you're reading him

completely wrong

smires knew exactly what Charlemagne was

going to say I mean not exactly but he

he knew what Charlemagne's message was

he invited him on the

show no he wasn't

surprised he wanted his audience to hear

Charlemagne's point of view just think

about

that he intentionally invited somebody

he knew was going to trash

Biden somebody who's black and is

influential smir did that here's what I

saw when I looked at Smur knish's face

and this is just subjective right but

remember I I have the perspective that

I'm already biased that he's

unbiased the look that I saw on his

face was just sort of like shock and

amazement like the rest of us so I think

he was just trying to keep a poker face

but I think he was having a reaction to

it but not the reaction that you know he

hated hearing it I think it was a

reaction of the moment we're in is a big

moment so what happens when all of those

people associated with CNN turn

completely on the story and agree with

the Republicans well they're not the

only ones Ellen dtz a famous Democrat

says Trump was unjustly convicted this

worst case in 60 years should never been

brought and the public should see the

judge's outrageous behavior now that's

pretty clear dtz is not saying I don't

know you could see this both ways nope

one of the most experienced and capable

legal Minds in the country a

Democrat said no this is totally crooked

totally crooked obviously crooked every

part of this is

crooked now I've taught you before that

if one of the major networks let's say

CNN or MSNBC say something is a fact but

then you go to the conservative Outlets

let's say breitbard or Fox News and they

say it's not a fact or vice versa one of

them says it's true and the other one

says

not it's usually

not usually not so or or let me put it a

better way you can't tell if it's

true it's just two versions now if you

could you know there's some objective

facts that they show you that you can

make up your own mind that's different

but you don't really know if something's

true if they disagree in their normal

way they disagree but it's

unusual that CNN and Fox News for

example would be on the same page about

anything and they're on the same page

that this was lawfare and it was

completely rigged system which is

phenomenal but here's the best

part um some of you know uh the name

Naval ravikant founder of angelist and

one of the most uh prominent investor

and thinkers in Silicon Valley what you

might not know about him is that he's

famously

non-political famously does a lot of

tweeting um you know he's one of the

most quoted people in uh in well most

quoted people in philosophy and

Technology at the moment success lot of

lot of different domains so he's

generally considered I've actually call

them the smartest person I've ever

met so let me say that again the

smartest person I've ever

met do you know how many smart people

I've met quite a few right so and I'll

stay with that you might be the smartest

person I've ever met now here I'm I'm

calling smart not just depth but

breadth he he can he can tell you the

better take on more to topics than any

human being I've ever met and it'll be a

different take and it'll be better than

one you had on so many different topics

it's crazy all right so when he talks

there are enough people certainly in the

investment world in the in the technical

World he's well known so when he says

anything that kind of Strays from his

non-political

stance your ears just go wait what did I

just

hear and here's what he said

he put two of Biden's uh posts on next

next to each

other and one of them was about Biden

bragging that he ignored the Supreme

Court to get um student loans

cancelled and then the next one was

where he was saying that nobody's Above

the

Law after the one where he said he got

around the

law

so naal quotes a famous quote from I

think some South American dictator type

and he and he said just this and nothing

else quote for my friends everything for

my enemies the

law now the way that quote is taken is

that when he says for my enemies the law

he doesn't mean just if they broke the

law that's the important part he means

you can use the law to get rid of

enemies and that's just the tool you use

and uh that is what we are

observing so now CNN has made it safe

for the least political person in all of

public

life to tell you that the former

president of the United

States is getting lawed right in front

of

you

now to you this might seem like a small

deal

but I don't think you quite understand

how much um how much persuasive

influence Nal has on the smartest people

in Silicon

Valley

he he is so

respected that when he puts down a stake

and I would say that he put down a stake

that this is too

far to get him to talk about anything in

the political domain and to make a

direct statement about it this is pretty

direct is

extraordinary I think the dam is about

to break I think CNN's already

broken I think the the investors in

Silicon Valley they're all going to turn

the Allin podcast is Allin Elon Musk

he's Allin

nval he just broke a long

tradition and and that I I'm I'm sure he

thought about it for a long time before

he did it something's happening that's

bigger than anything you could

imagine it it's not obvious yet but wow

you can feel it that there the the

feeling that things have gone too far is

so strong right now yeah the energy is

very

different and here's the part that uh I

was saving for you do you know what

judge M's first name

is how many of you know his first name

just off the top of your head have you

ever heard

it his first name is

Juan yeah Juan Muran that's the judge

that's going to jail Trump probably do

you know where he was

born Colombia country of

Colombia yeah judge judge

michan was born in Columbia

he's an

immigrant the judge that's judging

Trump is an immigrant from below the

Border does that sound like the right

choice the most famous build the wall

keep the South Americans where they are

of all time and his judge is one of the

people

that would have you know presumably the

biggest problem with that kind of

attitude gets

better uh his father was a military

officer in

Colombia military

officer for a while and then he later

served in

Colombia's intelligence

Services huh

colia what do we know about

Colombia what do we know about their

military what do we know about the

Colombian intelligence

Services let's see some people would say

that Colombia and the government and the

military are tightly connected with the

cartels some would

say and some would say that the cartels

are tightly linked with the American CIA

some would

say so let me ask you this if you were

the CIA and you knew that Trump didn't

even use your services for

intelligence and you knew that he was

talking about and other Republicans like

Tucker were talking about eliminating

the CIA and all of your jobs and you

wanted to stop

him who would be the best pick to do

that well

I would go with Juan meran father

military officer from Colombia who once

worked in their intelligence Services

somehow made it to the United States as

an immigrant and build quite a good

life that's who I'd

pick

so now I'm not going to make an

allegation because I don't know anything

about his

father but why does it look exactly like

you would think it would look if the

worst case scenario were true and that

the whole thing is the CIA and S fixed

why why does it look exactly like

that is that a

coincidence can can we write that off to

coincidence that it looks exactly like a

CIA

operation now again I'm only making

unfair inferences about people who are

known to be the types of people who

associate with other types of people so

that's a big you know I don't I don't

want to go further than that because

that would be

defamation so I'm not going to make a

claim that I know it's true I'm just

asking just asking don't you hate that

I'm

curious why there's such a big

coincidence involved especially when we

know that his selection was supposed to

be random but clearly wasn't because he

got three Trump cases in a row all

three so is it exactly what it looks

like

and in the meantime we hear the people

who are uh part of the deep State saying

that he's Merchant is going

to recommend jail

time despite the fact that nobody would

get jail time for this if they were not

Trump and the argument was because Trump

was sort of uh had a bad attitude and

violated the gag order so therefore they

would send him to

jail the that's the argument and and

that and on CNN one of the legal guys

was testing that argument out that's the

most absurd thing I've ever heard at the

same time there's a movement to change

the law so he can't get secret service

protection while he's in jail so he can

be

killed now uh I was talking with one of

my online buddies just before I went

live and you know I mentioned that it it

looked like on the surface it looks like

they're trying to kill him and he didn't

understand that I meant that literally

he thought I meant figuratively no

literally now I'm not going to say I

know that that's the case I'm going to

say if I were going to put odds on it

I'd say it's a 50% chance that there's

an active plan by our government to kill

Trump I think it's at least a 50%

chance and the reason I say that is that

we live through

Epstein if there had never been an

Ste if there had never been a Kennedy

who got assassinated if we didn't see

that RFK Jr also doesn't get secret

service protection for no good reason I

would have said okay our government

doesn't do things like that but clearly

they do things like that so yes they

they have an existential risk well to

their jobs uh if Trump becomes the

president again and what would they do

if they are the dirty tricks group of

the country the people who are selected

by their willingness to break

rules the CIA is

selected by their willingness to do

illegal things at least the operators

are because they're doing illegal things

in other

countries uh uh you could argue that

it's still legal in our country if they

do illegal things and it's authorized by

our country but that's sort of that's

sort of cutting it fine I mean they're

basically people who signed up for yeah

I'll go do super illegal things that'll

be my job and that way we would assume

that they wouldn't do super illegal

things when it's the very group that's

been

selected because they like to do or at

least they're willing to do super

illegal

things no it's at least a 50% chance

that they're trying to kill him Don JR

says the same thing it's not crazy it is

well within the parameters of what we've

seen if I'd never seen the laware

happen then I'd say well you know but

the courts are fair no they're not to me

it looks like the court case is driven

by the same people who are apparently if

you look at it on the surface on the

surface it looks exactly like a murder

plot with a statistical element which is

maybe they don't know for sure he'll be

killed in prison but they think there's

a good

chance

so anyway

that's

scary

um so uh over on

MSNBC The the stupid Network

representative Bowman's on there he says

if you stay home and you do not exercise

the power your vote you're giving your

power to white supremacist Mega

individuals you know where the white

supremacist Mega individuals are because

I I've never really seen one on the

news but I'm I'm going to take a

guess I think they're up in the

mountains with the white supremacist

militia that's forming they're hiding

away with the black guy who can't figure

out how to get an Ida to

vote and well you get it you get the

idea um V had an interesting legal take

I don't know if I'm buying it yet but

it's interesting um he says that Trump

can be pardoned by a

president uh for his New York conviction

even though it's a state matter normally

uh a president can only uh what would be

uh pardon or commute for something that

was a federal offense you can't do it

for a state charge and and Trump was

charged and convicted by the state

however the state's charges depended

entirely upon the fact that there were

also Federal

violations per their case so if you were

to uh pardon Trump from the federal part

of it it would make the state part of it

dissolve because the state part of it

depended on the federal part so even

though the federal part was not really

what the state found they still relied

on the jury thinking a federal thing had

been

violated so that they could apply the

state thing to the higher level

crime of felony because it supported the

other charge or vice versa one supported

the other I forget which way it went but

I don't know if I buy that I I it sounds

right but I feel like there might be an

alternative legal theory about whether

that's practical I like the thinking and

once again if it's

true if it's true how did we get this

far and why did V have to be the one to

bring it up because he went to a little

bit of law school so so he's the only

one have figured it

out man do we need him in the in the

government we need him so

much right even if he's wrong on this at

least he came up with this and that's

pretty

good anyway so the um yeah I do think V

is the primary thing that could keep

Trump alive if if they wanted to be vice

president and got nominated for that so

because he's the one that I think the

CIA would be most afraid of who not

named Trump so I think he's the way to

keep Trump

alive

um it would be wild if Trump nominated V

for vice president and said directly you

know what some other people were my top

choice but the V will keep me

alive can you imagine that cuz it was

real it's

real but he could say that directly you

know if a didn't want the job he wanted

to have a different role uh I had

somebody else in mind but honestly he's

the one who's going to keep me

alive I'd love to hear him say that

directly all right getting back into the

Soros

mystery uh I asked why is it that Soros

is doing what he's doing and I wanted

other people to explain it to me like

I'm an idiot so I could understand why

Soros would be funding so many things

that seem like disastrous for the

country that he lives

in right why would you destroy the

country that you live in now I I'm being

called naive and

uninformed and here's what I heard uh

from a user online that Soros supports

anarco tyranny all the things we're

seeing in the country because he

believes now this is the mind reading

part because he believes in a globalist

agenda that transcends National borders

uh and it wouldn't matter that he's a

citizen of the United States because

soros's preference would be that states

go away and he'll he'll do fine because

he's

Rich that ain't it

that ain't

it I I feel like this is an analysis

that comes from people who have never

been Rich may I give you my rich guy

analysis it's the only one you should

listen to Because Soros is Rich if

you're not hearing the opinion from

somebody also rich I mean I don't have

anything like his money but I've

experienced going from poor to to being

wealthy it changes you and here's the

thing you want the least if you're if

you're on top so right now he's sitting

at like the Pinnacle of human

beings you don't want that to

change if you're at the top the last

thing you want in a risk reward world

the last thing you want is to change the

whole system that you're dominating at

at the

top that introduces a risk of total

collapse that would take him from the

top to not the top it could make every

dollar he owns worth

nothing right so being in the top

1% let me tell you for sure because I'm

in it I don't want the whole system to

change dramatically in any

way now do I think that the whole system

should be changed dramatically yeah I

can think of lots of ways but I would

want to do them care

and without changing the general

structure of what got me to where I am

the last thing I want is to have the

country thrown into chaos and then I

have to figure out how to you know

create a good situation from scratch I'm

already in a good situation if you've

never experienced going from uncertainty

and economic you know low income to a

place where you would call yourself

wealthy when you get there the last

thing you want to do is change the whole

world into something you don't even know

what will happen nobody does that and

among the group of the nobodies who

would do that the top top top the very

number one person who wouldn't do that

is a person who's famous for being good

at risk

analysis that's what Soros is famous for

he's apparently unusually good at risk

analysis nobody with risk analysis

ability destroys the whole system

without a replacement you know that's

right online Nobody Does that so the

idea that he's in in favor of you know

destroying all the borders and forming a

global network is

crazy now here's the other

thing if a globalist One World

Government were to be

formed have you thought through who

would be in charge

that have you lived in the real world at

all if you form a real world government

of the you know top richest person

people like actually an official

government they would just fight with

each other it would be like the

Democrats and the Republicans they they

would be buying the fight of all fights

when none of them need a fight all the

billionaires are already the champions

of the world they can do whatever they

want they can affect governments easily

why would they change their situation

dramatically and if they did why do you

think Soros would be the you know like

top billionaire don't you think he would

get demoted as likely as

promoted it would be the craziest

riskiest chaotic thing to ever do if you

are already at the top the next thing is

that people say he's doing it for money

Scott you don't understand you know he

destroys countries and then he bets

against their currencies and then he

makes a whole bunch of money money now I

need a fact check on this but am I crazy

or is

Soros trying to give away his

money my understanding is he's trying to

donate most of it in the context of

trying to give away most of your money

you're not doing gigantic terrible

illegal things to make more money like

it doesn't even make

sense like how does that any of that

make sense so whatever is going on

here I have no idea I have no idea I

just know that the simplistic

explanations of a globalist One World

Government don't track at all with who

Soros is and I and I'm not reading his

mind I'm saying that nobody in that

situation would want that choice nor

have you ever heard

anybody show me show me a um show me a

billionaire who really wants uh

governments to go away and have one

world

government I I don't think there are any

and definitely not him because he's good

at risk management and nobody would

nobody would do that it would be

crazy

anyway so that's still a mystery let's

talk about the Israel peace deal uh as I

told you on day one it was always fake

so there's not there's not really a

peace deal that anybody's going to take

too seriously but it looks like Israel's

going to buy some time I don't know how

long it will take to get whatever they

need done in

Rafa but it's probably a few

months you don't think that they can

stall negotiations for two months of

course they

can of course they

can yeah the world economic forum is

even the more ridiculous

Theory yeah I think Elon Musk is right

about them being a club for rich

people uh if if Elon Musk isn't worried

and he's about as close to the inside of

the the world as anybody could be and he

seems totally uncon you know unconvinced

there's any danger there and I agree

with him completely I think it's just a

club for rich

people meanwhile in Ukraine Russia's

trying to uh they say bomb Kira what is

the second biggest city

it's not Kev it's

uh kir kirov or something I forget

anyway it looks like the Russians are

trying to take out their vital services

and depopulate it before they do

anything bigger so it looks like the

current method of taking over a city in

a military way is the American and

Israeli version as a little more boots

on the ground the Russian version is H

we'll go in when there's nothing left

car carco

kov thank you the city is kov

kov kov or kov one of

those

anyway not much happening there besides

the usual Badness that by the way

concludes my comments for today sorry I

ran long again I'm going to say bye to

uh YouTube and Rumble and X I'm going to

talk to the good folks on locals

privately the subscri

and uh I'll see the rest of you tomorrow

hope you enjoyed the show bye for now

locals hold on coming to

you

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e but