Episode 2493 CWSA 06/02/24
Wait until I connect the dots today on politics and the news ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better day. Let me tell you, the omens are all lining up for an amazing, amazing day, probably the best you've ever seen. Now let's see. There I am. No, I still do…
View segment →ur experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their tiny human smooth brains, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass or a tankard, a chalice, a stein, a thermos flask, a sippy cup, or a bottle, whatever kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now…
View segment →'s talk about the news. Today's Dilbert Reborn shows you, in the first panel, I posted it on X, you can see that I designed it with AI. So the first panel of the Dilbert comic, I used AI to tell me some interesting camera angles or perspectives for a guy on his computer when a dog walks into the roo…
View segment →n robots that take another 25 percent off the price or something like that. I tell you that if there's a way to invest in solar, I'm not recommending you invest in it because I don't make recommendations for investments, but it does seem like maybe there's something that's going to happen here that…
View segment →g before I did? All right, enough about you. Tucker Carlson's being really outspoken on his video recently. Said nothing is ever about our safety and that all the big political stuff is clearly about the interests of the people in power. He said this country and the world only changes when we elimi…
View segment →als, and if you assume that Democrats don't have an option, they have to be diverse, it's their brand, so they're forced to be diverse but they're demonstrating to the rest of the world through what I would consider the most incompetent administration of all time and the most incompetent campaign an…
View segment →strategy because they don't have anything of substance. Trump has substance. He can say you see all that crime, I'm going to do the normal things that people normally do to get less of it. Is that imaginary? I don't think so. Seems pretty real. He says he's going to negotiate with Putin and Zelensky…
View segment →ease the audio when they've willingly and already and publicly and everybody's seeing the transcript? What reason could there be other than it sounds really terrible? Like really bad. It must be awful. Just guessing. But listen to one of the arguments that they just proffered. They say that the aud…
View segment →ere's how David Sacks explains it. He calls it the business records double standard. In 2016 Hillary Clinton's campaign was fined $8,000. That was it. A fine of $8,000 for the following, for violating federal campaign finance laws. Why? Her team falsely reported the funding of the Steele dossier as…
View segment →et? Quite a few, right? So and I'll stay with that. You might be the smartest person I've ever met. Now here I'm calling smart not just depth but breadth. He can tell you the better take on more topics than any human being I've ever met and it'll be a different take and it'll be better than one you…
View segment →te's charges depended entirely upon the fact that there were also federal violations per their case. So if you were to pardon Trump from the federal part of it it would make the state part of it dissolve because the state part of it depended on the federal part. So even though the federal part was n…
View segment →world as anybody could be and he seems totally unconvinced there's any danger there and I agree with him completely. I think it's just a club for rich people. Meanwhile in Ukraine, Russia's trying to bomb Kharkiv. What is the second biggest city? It's not Kiev. It's Kharkiv. I forget anyway. It loo…
View segment →Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better day. Let me tell you, the omens are all lining up for an amazing, amazing day, probably the best you've ever seen.
Now let's see. There I am. No, I still don't see the feed. All right, it would be live. That's where it would be. There I am. We're live.
Well, if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their tiny human smooth brains, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass or a tankard, a chalice, a stein, a thermos flask, a sippy cup, or a bottle, whatever kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the immediate sip of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it's going to happen now.
Ah. Powering up. You know what? I feel like I feel so good. I feel like an outlaw. Yeah, that's how good I feel. How am I feeling? Felonious. Yeah, felonious. It's a great feeling.
All right, let's talk about the news. Today's Dilbert Reborn shows you, in the first panel, I posted it on X, you can see that I designed it with AI. So the first panel of the Dilbert comic, I used AI to tell me some interesting camera angles or perspectives for a guy on his computer when a dog walks into the room. Now AI can't produce my characters because it'll complain about copyright and stuff, but it can give me a generic guy and a generic dog. And then when I have the angle of all the furniture, I just replace them with my characters. So you can see how that worked out. It gave me a new angle that I had never used before. So that's my first, I think my first real-world repeatable. I'll definitely use it again. AI assist to writing my daily comic. So it's sort of a milestone.
Well, apparently there's a Tesla deal being worked out to give Elon Musk his money that they gave him and then took away from him. The courts took away. And the only portion that he would be able to use for five years is to pay the taxes that he would owe if he were to get it right away. So apparently you can't just take the money and run. Some people were worried about that. He'd have to stay there for five years to get his money. So it should make the stockholders a little bit happy if he has to stay there and work for another five years. So we'll see. We hope he gets his money.
There's a gigantic Wall Street Journal story. It says there's a huge cost-saving technology for making solar panels. Now you've heard this story a billion times, but this one sounds pretty promising. I didn't realize that China can make solar panels at roughly half the price of an American manufacturer, but with this new technology it should close that gap a lot. And apparently it's not just theoretical. It looks like it's ready to put into the system. Yeah, I won't get into the technical details, but it reduces the amount of silver they need, makes something thinner than before, and would reduce the cost substantially.
And I ask you again, which one of the climate models takes into account technical innovations that totally change the curve? None. Because you can't put in a climate model the thing that hasn't been invented yet. And yet we know there'll be tons of things invented between now and when they imagine the Earth is going to burn up. So if you don't put human invention in your 100-year model, is that credible? Think about how different the world is in any 20-year period. You know, it's the difference between AI and no AI, computers and no computers, smartphones and no smartphones. Twenty years is a long time. So these climate models are absurd in leaving out probably the biggest variable. I mean, you think if you're looking at climate change, the biggest variable is the CO2 or the sun or the ocean, but probably the biggest variable is human innovation. It's not even in the model, right? Tell me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that the models assume that we don't innovate for the rest of humankind. We just sort of die.
All right, so that's happening. Here's the scariest, coolest thing. There's a Swiss startup that has made a computer out of brain organoids. Now I don't know what an organoid is, but I'm going to guess it's something like an artificial brain that they built in a Petri dish or a tube or something. So I don't think it came from a human. I hope. You know, maybe the cells did or something. But they now have, in the real world apparently, you can connect to this thing if you're paying them, and it consumes a million times less power than regular digital processors. And it's fast. Let me say that again. There will be a data center, a data center. This is already real, by the way. This is not speculative. This is today functioning. There's human brain parts that they've somehow connected to a digital interface, and they use the human brain part to do the calculating at one million times less power than regular stuff.
Do you think there's any way that if it works and it can be reproduced, that it does work? As so it's already up and running. So if it could be reproduced at scale, who in the world is going to pay for regular computing when you can have a computer that gets a million times less power? We are building a human brain slash cyborg. The Borg. I don't know. It's super cool but also super whoa, because you don't know what could go wrong. Wait a minute. How many ways could it go wrong if we start building human brain organoid computers? I don't know. I guess it raises questions. I'm not afraid of it per se, but it raises a lot of questions.
Well, NASA had to once again delay its astronaut crewed flight of what would be the Boeing Starliner, I think. First flight with astronauts. And I didn't see the reason that the flight was scrubbed, but I have a theory. It's a Boeing Starliner. And I think the problem is, you know how juries sometimes are sequestered? Yeah, if the jury is going to go home, sometimes the judge will say, oh, you can't go home. You have to stay away from any influence because you don't want them reading the news. They might act differently, the jurors, if they read the news. You want them to stick to just the trial data. And I'm starting to think that the astronauts for the Boeing Starliner maybe they should have been sequestered for the last month to maybe not see any news about Boeing's quality control lately. So I worry that the reason it's delayed is that the astronauts were watching the news and said, um, I think I've got a cold or something. I'm not sure I can go. Oh, my arm. So something's going wrong here. I'll never be able to control it. Maybe you better use the backup. I don't know. I'm just joking.
All right. Did you know that China's labor costs are about double that of the Philippines, Malaysia, India, Thailand, and Vietnam? I'll tell you, you think that the United States has trouble. You think we have problems. We do. But how would you like to be China and your entire situation depends on manufacturing because it's the backbone of the economy, and you're twice as expensive as the alternatives? And everybody has a gigantic incentive to get their business out of there. What are they going to do? Now, besides the fact that these countries have half the cost and they presumably are building up some infrastructure so they can be serious competitors to China. But I also haven't heard about Mexico. I don't know what the cost of labor is in Mexico compared to China. And I also don't know what's going to happen with robots. Because if we're making these much cheaper solar panels and then we get rid of the labor by putting robots in the factories. So you use a manufacturing process that drops the price by, I don't know, half, and then you put in robots that take another 25 percent off the price or something like that.
I tell you that if there's a way to invest in solar, I'm not recommending you invest in it because I don't make recommendations for investments, but it does seem like maybe there's something that's going to happen here that could be gigantic. You don't really think of robots influencing energy except to use it. You know, they use a lot of energy. But they're going to be building the solar panels and the solar plants and the solar everything and probably the nuclear power plants too soon.
All right, so there's a story that we don't know what the real story is, but Alex Jones is going through something that looks bad. Now he's saying that the feds came to his door and they were trying to lock him out and take all of his stuff and close him down. But he was also acting, let's say I'm going to say emotional. If it were somebody I didn't like, I would use other words. But since I like him, you know, he was nice to me, he's had me on the show, and when somebody's nice to me in person, I can't really just go in public and then trash him. Like, it just, I'm just not built that way. So because I've met him in person and he was very generous to me, I'll say that he's having an emotional reaction that we don't quite understand. Some people say it's mental health. Some people say it's substance. Some people say it's both. Some people say get an MRI. But I think his staff has backed him up. By the way, his staff is on the same page. So it's not just him. Whatever is going on, his staff seems to have witnessed it as well. So I don't know who these feds were or what exactly they were trying to do, except that it's in the context of everybody who is pro-Trump getting a hit. So I don't know what's going on, but keep an eye on it. He may need some help in any variety of ways. We don't know what the problem is, but he's clearly in a crisis situation. And so if you have any interest in either his operation or him as a human being, have a little bit of empathy and keep an eye on that. Maybe there's a way you can help one way or another.
All right. Mexico. Here's a story that snuck up on me. Imagine finding this out today. This is kind of mind-blowing. The next president of Mexico is likely to be a Jewish woman. Is this the first time you're hearing that? I heard it today. So apparently they're having an election. The sitting president can't run again. They have one-term presidents, six years. And the mentor, somebody who's worked closely with the current president, so he's recommending her. And that's the reason she's getting her push. Claudia Sheinbaum, a Jewish woman with a PhD in energy engineering. That's about as perfect as you can get, isn't it? How would you like to be the president of Mexico? You're coming in with a PhD in energy engineering. But it gets better. She's bilingual. She used to live in the Bay Area. She used to live in the Bay Area. She's bilingual. The current president of Mexico is not bilingual. Do you think that makes a difference? Hell yes. Hell yes. Language is the big uniter, right? If you can talk to somebody in the same language, it's a whole different experience, right? That's how you bond. You don't really bond with Putin if he can't speak your language or she. But wouldn't it be nice to have somebody we could work with in the same language who's a PhD in energy engineering?
Now we all assume that the cartels have undue influence on the government, so there's that. But are you also surprised that Mexico would be even considering, apparently she's way ahead in the polls, it looks like it's a lock, very popular. Did you see a female president of Mexico coming anytime soon? It's kind of interesting and impressive. And this is the DEI you want, you know what I mean? This is diversity done correctly as far as I can tell. The only reason she's being considered is that she's overwhelmingly qualified. So how about that? How about just being overwhelmingly qualified and then getting the top job? Okay, I'm good with that. So at least on paper she looks like exactly the person that America would want in that job as well as the Mexicans. So maybe something good's coming out of that.
And there is talk that Mexico's going to have an economic boom like you've never seen before because, remember, the manufacturing is moving toward it. That's a good sign. And they've got some major infrastructure things like maybe a railroad and some other stuff that will connect the resorts and turn it into more of a well-engineered destination. So all that's happening if the cartels don't derail things. There's something good that could happen.
Now I've said this before, but here's what I think is the only hope for living with Mexico. I'm seeing somebody mocking me for quote believing in solar. Let's pretend that you know what you're talking about. Now, did you think I was unaware that there's a waste problem? Of course there is. Of course there is. Am I unaware that people are not good at calculating the relative cost and benefits in the future of different technological options? I used to do that work. I know it can't be done. It used to be my job to calculate expenses in the future. You can't really do that. It was my job, but I couldn't do it and nobody can do it. So do I think that, do I know what the economics of solar power will be next year? No, I don't. You know what? But do you know what I do know? That the person who is mocking me, you don't know. No, you're an idiot who thinks you know the expenses of technologies you've never been involved with because you read an article somewhere, right? I'm smart enough to know that I don't know what will be the competing cost structures 20 years from now, which is what you have to think about, right? It's not what it is today. It's if you start a project, what does your nuclear power plant cost in 10 years when you're done with it? You know, what is your solar plant and your gigafactory or your giga storage thing? What does it cost in 10 or 20 years? Nobody knows that. If you think you know it, dear troll commenter, well, you're the smartest person in the world according to you because you know what can't be known. Good for you.
Did you know about this story about the technology that would lower the cost of solar? Did you read that this morning before I did?
All right, enough about you. Tucker Carlson's being really outspoken on his video recently. Said nothing is ever about our safety and that all the big political stuff is clearly about the interests of the people in power. He said this country and the world only changes when we eliminate the CIA. It'll take someone willing to be assassinated. He gives examples. He said you open the southern border to anyone who wants to come in. You're not checking IDs. You're not doing any kind of biometrics. You're not even screening for COVID. So clearly you don't care about my safety. Check, check, check. Correct. Yes, there is no evidence that the people in power of our country are interested in the well-being of the citizens. There is plenty of evidence, the open border, that they're operating against our interests for reasons we don't quite understand. I don't understand it. We'll talk about more of that later.
But he's saying directly that the CIA has to be cancelled completely. I saw an ex-CIA operative, agent, whatever you want to call them, also on Tucker show saying that when Trump was the president he didn't use the CIA as much as he used private intelligence people to tell him what was going on. Why would he do that? Why would you pay somebody to do the job of the CIA when the CIA is already being paid and therefore it's free on an incremental basis? Why would you do that? I can only think of one reason. That the president of the United States did not think that the CIA was on the same side as he was. In other words, Trump, the person who knew the most about the CIA while in office, had the most access, didn't believe that he could trust them with the security of the United States. You have to eliminate them under that situation. If a sitting president doesn't think they're even on the same side, not even on the same side, you can't live with that. So if you can buy these services on the open market and you don't trust the ones in the government, there is an argument for eliminating the CIA. And it's strong. You'd have to hear the other side, and I'm not sure they can tell the other side because it'd be full of secrets. But is there a surface-y argument that says getting rid of the CIA? The most, that's a pretty radical thing to do. Is there an argument for it? Yeah, there is.
You know, there was a time when the CIA was overthrowing governments and doing all kinds of things to help America control the world. And you could have at that time said I don't like America doing all these other things in other countries, so I don't like the CIA. But there would have been a good argument to keep them because, let me make the Machiavellian power argument here. Wouldn't it be nice if the United States left all the other countries alone and left them to pursue their best interest for their people until they become thriving democracies and allies of us in the future, once they've used their own free will and their own resources to become an independent country that could be like a strong ally for us? No, not in the real world. In the real world if we didn't take them over, somebody else would have, right? China would have taken them because whoever has money can control any small entity, whether it's a country, a politician, or another country. Yeah, any other country. So it doesn't take much money to overthrow a country. You just bribe the right people and there you go. Yeah, you maybe could bribe 50 people to overthrow any country and they're probably all bribable. So the levers are there for controlling other countries.
But here's my argument, the Machiavellian argument for the CIA. They might be complete bastards who are doing terrible things to other countries every day, but if they didn't, what would happen? Somebody else would. And then we would be surrounded by countries that, let's say China had a lot of control over. That's no good. So the thing is that the worst, or best, let me say the best criminal wins. We don't live in a world where there's good versus evil. There's just evil versus evil at the government level. Humans tend to be closer to good. You know, if you leave them alone they're more likely to be good to each other because we're sort of tribal. We grew up that way. But countries are evil. As soon as you have a country it's probably corrupt no matter who it is. So maybe the strongest criminal organization is the one you want to be with. The strongest criminal organization at the moment, America appears to be the strongest criminal organization, which might be your safest situation in a historical sense. Historically you just wanted to be in the strongest country and it didn't matter why they were the strongest, right? Don't you think you were safer being a Roman citizen when Rome was at its peak? Without supporting that Rome were good guys. They weren't good guys. But it was probably the safest place to live in those times, you know, to be a Roman citizen. So we're sort of the Roman citizens. It feels like to me.
So yes, there's an argument that the CIA works against our interests, but I'd like to hear the counterargument. I just don't know anybody can make it because you'd have to say what I said. Yeah, we're kind of criminals. We do terrible things every single day. You wouldn't even want to know what we're doing in your name, but it keeps you safer because we're the best criminals. That might be the argument. And I could be convinced by that. I hate it, but it's a world in which sometimes your best choice is also terrible. Don't know.
All right, well, but keep in mind that Tucker's father was in the CIA, I believe, and he often thinks that, I mean he has a good window into that world. So I take his opinion seriously.
Oh, trolls being really extra stupid in public is not hurting me. It's just amusing me. Yeah, it's just amusing me. So thanks. Say some more really dumb things about the future of technology to entertain the rest of the commenters. They would like to see your stupidity in full flower. So say some more irrational things, please.
All right, let's talk about the hoaxocracy. As you know, the Biden campaign is built entirely on hoaxes, from the fine people hoax to the Trump tears gas peaceful protesters hoax and a lot more. Drinking bleach. It's one hoax after another. And the Biden-Harris headquarters X account said four years ago today Trump tears gassed peaceful protesters outside the White House. Well, it took about a minute before Joel Pollak fact-checked them hard. And nope, that was all debunked by sources that Democrats trust as well as Republicans. So why is it that the campaign can be so blatant about something that's been fact-checked and very clearly didn't happen? I mean absolutely did not happen and it's well known. Their audience is so underinformed, of course they know it's a lie, but they know it works so they're going to say it anyway.
I'm not so sure. I'm not so sure. I think that the Biden-Harris campaign is so DEI-crippled that the level of incompetence there, you can't really assume that it's normal. It's probably extraordinary. And if you're new to my commentary, let me quickly add we're not talking about anybody's genes or culture. That's not in the conversation about DEI. DEI is a system. It's not a person. It's not a person. It's a system. And the system moves people around like little chess pieces, and there aren't enough chess pieces for what they need to do. So they meet their diversity targets whether they have qualified candidates or not, because humans always meet the targets that they're measured on and their performance is judged upon. And that big thing they're judged on. So if you assume that DEI as a system is guaranteed to fail because the pipeline of qualified people would be smaller than the demand, forcing them to take lesser and lesser qualified people just to meet their diversity goals, and if you assume that Democrats don't have an option, they have to be diverse, it's their brand, so they're forced to be diverse but they're demonstrating to the rest of the world through what I would consider the most incompetent administration of all time and the most incompetent campaign and the most incompetent spokesperson, and all of those things are permeated with DEI hires which, if they were qualified to do their jobs, you would see a better job. Yeah, I'm not talking about one thing that I'm criticizing. There's a pervasive incompetence in the current government like we've never really seen before. And the campaign is so obviously incompetent and they're so obviously backing the wrong guy that this is sort of the Biden campaign is basically your canary in the coal mine for every corporation, right? They just got to diversity faster because they're so public. They really had to. Companies are also trying to go as fast as they can, but you can see what happens when you get to DEI diversity goals when you have a limited pipeline of qualified people, again because of systemic racism at the school level just not producing enough diverse candidates. So yeah, the hoax campaign and the DEI incompetence should bring down the whole house in a few months. I'm expecting a complete demolition of the Biden campaign. I think we're close to the point where the whole thing's just going to come off the rails in a way we've never seen before. Maybe a whistleblower. We'll see.
I was watching a body language expert look at the two faces of Biden because that's sort of becoming a thing. And the one face is his angry troll face that looks like a cat's all puckered up. You know, his face is all squeezed like all of his face meets in his nose, one little puckered place. And then you see his wide-eyed open vessel. So he's got the demon look where he looks demon-possessed. And then in the same talk sometimes he'll have the empty vessel where his eyes are wide open and his mouth is forming that Hillary Clinton looking at balloons drop. And you say to yourself, how in the world is that the same person? And we still don't know. I love the fact that he's clearly two different people. I mean I think it's the same organic person, but there's something that causes him to be a different personality so much so he doesn't even look the same. Not even a little bit. I mean you can generally recognize it's Biden, but you would think it's a different person if they stood next to each other. So here are the possibilities. One is drugs. One is mental illness. One is some kind of a deepfake thing, but I don't think so. And one is maybe there's something about editing. For example, you've seen all the quick edits they've done on his videos. Could it be that they have to take so much time off between edits that he takes a nap and just recovers and he wakes up and his eyes are open and he's the morning version? Could it be that we're seeing Morning Joe? Hey, Morning Joe, get it? Could it be that when we see Morning Joe he's a little bit more lucid and that when we see evening Joe that he's declined into his dementia yelling puckered face? Something like that. Whatever is going on is really bad. It's not good, whatever it is.
All right. I can't wait for the first interview with the imaginary Republican who's not going to vote for Trump because the lawfare got him. Have any of you met that person yet? I mean I'm being told often and reliably by all the polls that people have decided that since Trump got convicted by an unfair trial that therefore they're not going to vote for him. So we're all waiting to see the person, right? You know where I think that person is? I don't know, but I think the imaginary Republican who's not going to vote for Trump because of lawfare could be hanging out and partying with the black American voter who didn't know how to get an ID. I think they're together because we can't find either one of them. And I think maybe they're helping each other hide. So somewhere, maybe in cabins, possibly in the mountains where the MAGA supremacists are gathering their imaginary armies. So it could be that the imaginary MAGA supremacist armies that are in the hills are creating a sanctuary for the imaginary Republicans who say they won't vote for Trump. But maybe also I'd like to say that they're diverse and that they've included the black Americans who want to vote and know enough about the world that they think voting makes sense yet can't figure out how to get an ID. Yeah, we know they exist. We were told they exist. We've never talked to one. We've never seen one. But the Democrats are quite sure the imaginary army in the hills and the imaginary Republicans who don't like Trump now and the imaginary guy who can't get an ID, they're all real.
And what about the imaginary events that they're running on? Every part of the Democrat platform is imaginary. All the hoaxes are imaginary. All the data that they give us about their current performance, completely imaginary. They say they're controlling the border, everything's fine. That's imaginary. What about the money that they're spending? Is Biden spending real money? Not anymore. When you have $35 trillion in debt, whatever it is that you're spending is imaginary because whoever lent it to you, they ain't getting it back. So we've got an imaginary economy, imaginary data. We've got real problems that they imagine or not. They've got an imaginary Trump who's in their imagination tried to take over on January 6 and they imagined that he would do it again even though he never did it. They think he'll do again the thing he never did once. So we have imaginary policies, imaginary people, imaginary Trump in the future, imaginary data. Do Republicans do that? Could you reverse the argument and say, oh Scott, I see your point, but look at all the imaginary things that the Republicans believe. Now maybe you would go after religion if you were not religious. You'd say oh they believe in imaginary stuff. But is it imaginary to think that your nine-month-old fetus is sort of alive? Is that imaginary? That doesn't seem imaginary. You could differ on what you think about it or what the law should be, but it's not imaginary, right? The debt is not imaginary. The lawfare is not imaginary. Even CNN's analysts are saying it's real.
So here's what I think has happened. I think the Democrats sort of tiptoed into the imaginary world and it worked because they can control the press for at least their base. They can tell them literally anything. And once they realize that you can tell them anything and the actual reality won't make any difference because they also control the fact-checkers, they realize that going fully imaginary is a better strategy. And I agree, by the way. It's a better strategy because they don't have anything of substance. Trump has substance. He can say you see all that crime, I'm going to do the normal things that people normally do to get less of it. Is that imaginary? I don't think so. Seems pretty real. He says he's going to negotiate with Putin and Zelensky to end the war. Now it might be hard, but is it imaginary? It's not imaginary. And the entire reason we're in Ukraine, do you think the government told you the real reason that we're in Ukraine? No, they gave you an imaginary reason. The imaginary reason is that Putin's going to roll up Europe if he gets Ukraine, with no regard to the fact that some of us know the history of Ukraine and that, as Mike Benz can explain better, the whole thing looks like an energy play between two criminal organizations, one United States and the other Russia. And basically it's like we're stealing their drug stash so we can sell it ourselves, their energy. That's a better way to look at it.
So I can't think of anything the Democrats are doing that isn't imaginary. Because once you realize that your imaginary case will always be stronger than the real world one, why would you ever use the real world? It's unnecessary. They've actually found a way to depart from all reality without paying for it. It's free because as long as their press keeps backing them, their own people will never go read Breitbart. You know, the Democrats will never go over to Fox News just to see what the other people say. Although surprisingly Fox News does have a lot of Democrat viewers, but I feel like they might be conservatives.
All right, let's go on to some more. This is going to get better as I go, by the way. I've organized my materials so that I'm going to reach a crescendo. So don't leave before the crescendo. That'd be crazy.
All right. So disgraced DA Alvin Bragg. I like just using disgraced in front of everything. All right. So there seems to be a whole bunch of trolls on YouTube. All the behavior of social media looks suspicious now. You know that I don't believe that the trolls are organic anymore, at least not during the election season. They're really active and they're yelling imaginary things. So the trolls are literally saying imaginary things about me to try to embarrass me on my own live stream. Let's see who would do that. Imaginary things. What group of people really, really, really love imaginary stuff? It's probably exactly what you think it is.
All right. So here's something I didn't know about Alvin Bragg. He went to Harvard. Are you telling me that all the times that people have been ripping on Alvin Bragg, nobody thought to mock him for having a degree from Harvard? Come on, people, improve your game. It's not for me to help you avoid these mistakes. No, it's funny. It's funny you went to Harvard. Now to be fair, not recently. So maybe he went to Harvard back when it made a difference what your credentials were. If he had just graduated from Harvard, I would be saying DEI hire because Harvard's become ridiculous about their standards. But maybe when he was there it was closer to he belonged there. So I don't know. I'm not going to say he didn't belong in Harvard because there was a time when Harvard was at least a little bit credible. But according to my digital creature from Amazon whose name I don't want to say out loud because I'll trigger it, he has a net worth of $41 million. But I didn't see that explained. Do you think it's true? So first of all, I don't know it's true. It's just coming from the digital assistant. So somebody could have put wrong information on there. But is he independently wealthy and how so? I guess I would ask for a fact check on that. I do not assert that to be true, just to be clear. I do not assert that it's true, but it's on at least one source of information. So I'm curious about that.
Did you know that Michigan, they were looking at a law to make it harder to cheat, but the Democrats had the advantage and they passed laws to make it easier to cheat, right? It's 2024 and in Michigan the Democrats unanimously passed legislation that would make it easier to cheat, not harder. Can you think of a reason why they do that? Do you think they're planning on an imaginary election where you imagine that you knew the results but really you don't? Well, that's what I'd worry about. That was from the Gateway Pundit. They're reporting. Also Gateway Pundit is saying that there's some poll of Arab American voters and Biden is way off in his popularity. He had a 60 percent Arab American vote in 2020, but he's down to about 20 percent support now. I don't think the Arab American community is big enough that it's going to move the election, but wow, I think it's one more sign of complete collapse. I don't think we realize how close the Democrat Party is to total collapse because until it happens it doesn't look like it's going to happen. You know, nothing happens until something happens. So I feel like the major tent pole holding up the Democrats is really creaky right now. And if that one cracks, the rest go.
Do you know what the tent pole is that holds up the entire Democrat Party? It's the fine people hoax. If the fine people hoax can be debunked so that Democrats can see it in a way that's credible, that takes everything away. And the fact that the Republicans don't go after that, you know, basically just people like me, pundits, do. I never really understood that anyway.
Tim Pool abruptly cut his own live stream because he had Laura Loomer as a guest. And Laura Loomer was talking about getting back at Democrats and that there was enough crime there that if Trump got back in office there would be a number of people who should be dealt with with the legal process. However, I think her rhetoric reached a point where Tim Pool's entire show was probably at risk if he didn't pull it down himself. So I'm going to give Tim Pool a big compliment. Nicely done. Nicely done. So I'll tell you in softer words what Laura Loomer said so that I also don't get cancelled.
All right. So Laura Loomer said that the level of the criminal behavior consistent with the laws on the books for treason might go to the level of the death penalty. Now here's the problem. If you were to say hey, people might be guilty of certain crimes, here's why we think they are, the penalty for that could be the death penalty, it should be on the table. That's okay because you're just talking about the law. Here's what I think is too far. And let's see if you would have spotted it because Tim Pool did. So he's good at this, right? If you say let's get a list of names of people and then before you've tried them you say we want to kill these people, then you sort of become Alvin Bragg yourself. You hear what I'm saying? You don't want to start with the person and then talk about the death penalty unless you've really had a lot of conversations and in a court case that's credible about those charges. But it's real dangerous to go full Fannie Willis or who was it, Letitia James, and say you're running for office to get Trump. That's too far. Somehow she's not paying for that, but it's way too far. So Tim Pool I think very smartly and very decisively said oh shoot, she just gave YouTube a predicate to cancel my whole channel and I'm not going to die on this hill. It wasn't even my opinion. This was a guest's opinion. So nice move. Nice move, Tim Pool. Because the information still gets out. You know, the social media picks it up, but he reduces his risk on YouTube and he lives to fight again. Total respect for that. Nicely played. Good decision-making. And I don't think you could have played that better. And you know I don't mind that Laura Loomer has her opinion, so it's not about her opinion. I think that part was fine. It's just you don't want to give YouTube this fresh batch of red meat to cancel you because they want to cancel Tim Pool. So well played.
Jonathan Turley, still national treasure, talking about any of the legal elements of politics. So he talks about the fact that the whole situation where the government or the Republicans were trying to get a hold of the audio that they only have the transcript of Biden doing his testimony to Hur. And of course the Democrats say hey, you have the transcript, that's good enough. And then the Republicans say yeah, but we don't trust the transcript. We think you might have edited it and it might be way worse than the transcript shows. And we have a right to know because if Biden is not capable, it's got to be 25th Amendment situation. So they definitely have a right to know. I completely support their attempt to get that. But listen to, according to Turley, the Justice Department is making a new claim for why they can't release the audio of something they've already released the transcript to. Can you think of any reason why you wouldn't release the audio when they've willingly and already and publicly and everybody's seeing the transcript? What reason could there be other than it sounds really terrible? Like really bad. It must be awful. Just guessing.
But listen to one of the arguments that they just proffered. They say that the audio tape must be withheld due to the risk that it could be altered by artificial intelligence and passed off as an authentic in a deepfake release. Quote, the passage of time and advancements in audio artificial intelligence and deepfake technologies only amplify concerns about malicious manipulation of audio files. Wouldn't that apply to everything that anybody has on audio? I feel like that is such a stretch, such a stretch that it's almost just laughable. But I'm going to surprise you. It's not a terrible argument. It strikes you as immediately absurd. I mean that's how it struck me. But let me support it as best I can. It's somewhat rare that you would have a situation where there's an audio only because that's easier to deepfake. If it had been something he'd said in public it'd be easy to debunk it because you'd say okay, here's the real one. He said this in public. Now you can see how the deepfake changed it. But since the only public thing we'd have is an audio that nobody listens to, if somebody were to take a clip out of it and do a 10-second clip where it sounds like he said the N-word or something ridiculous, then I think people would believe it. I do, because if the headline story said the audio tape is out and then you saw a clip and then you played it and you heard what you thought was Biden's voice and he sounded really dementia-ridden and crazy and saying racist stuff and whatever, you might believe it. And we're close enough to the election where a fake audio tape could actually change things. Remember the audio tape of Trump saying grab them by the, people thought that was going to change the election. It turns out it didn't. But is it a realistic risk that when you're this close to an election and it's the president who's running for reelection and it's audio only, it is actually an unusually big risk, wouldn't you agree? Because I think somebody would alter it immediately. That it's not even a risk. It would happen. It would happen. I think you could say with complete confidence that there would be at least a parody version which people would think was real. At the very least it would be a parody version where he's just saying crazy stuff.
So I don't think this should be upheld because if you generalize this it would be devastating to the normal operation of the world. But it's not crazy. It's not crazy that it opens the door to a bad thing happening. But let me suggest this, and I think the people asking for it will say the same thing. We already have the transcript and we already have a zillion hours of Biden talking on audio and other places. AI doesn't need the specific audio from the event. All you have to do is run the transcript through it on a voice that's trained as Biden and then if that works you go back in and you edit the transcript and feed back into AI again. So instead of saying the real transcript in Biden's voice, it adds the N-word or some crazy thing. So I feel as if maybe the lawyers making this ask don't understand how AI works. Did they not understand that whether we have the transcript or not or whether we have the audio or not, it actually doesn't have any effect on whether somebody would make a deepfake? Yeah, the defect that they're worried about could be made tomorrow based on what's already publicly available with no research whatsoever. You know, just Google transcript. And yeah, actually you don't even have to have the transcript because if you're going to do a fake one you can make up the transcript. Nobody's going to check. See, the trouble with fakes is that they do their damage before they're debunked and the debunk never gets the attention of the original. So there's nothing that you couldn't do right now to fake that.
Okay, so Trump went to the UFC yesterday, got a standing ovation. It was crazy. Do you know what that standing ovation at the UFC sounded like to me? Well, if you just heard it on the surface it sounded like yay Trump yay. But here's what I heard. We'll take the outlaw. Did you see the crowd? Almost all men. Well, I mean dominant male audience. The men there were very clearly by their reaction saying outlaw. You just made him better. There's almost nothing you could have done to Trump that would have been as good for his brand than becoming an outlaw to the crooked government. Honestly, I love it. My honest opinion without the spin. You know it's the spin season so even I, as much as I try to avoid spinning, everybody's going to do it this season. But honestly, in my body and my real mind, no spin, I just love that he's an outlaw because the way he got there. You know if he'd robbed a bank I'd say no. But the way he got there, oh yeah, yeah, I want the outlaw. Absolutely, positively, no qualms about it. Give me the outlaw. And that's what the UFC audience basically said in their own way.
But it gets better. After UFC fighter Kevin Holland won, he jumped over the ring and went right to President Trump, former President Trump, and shook his hand and said some private words to him in support. Obviously Trump slapped him on the shoulders and obviously they're now friends. You should know that UFC fighter Kevin Holland is black. Does it matter? Yes, yep, because it's public and people are very affected by social forces. So if you see a black superstar going right to President Trump and congratulating him, that's powerful. Yeah, a lot of clips on it. Likewise UFC fighter Sean Strickland said on the microphone to the crowd, President Trump, you're the man. It is a damn travesty what they're doing to you. I'll be donating to you. I'll be donating to you is the key phrase.
By the way, I don't know if you have the current data, but in the 48 hours after the felony conviction verdict Trump had already earned 1.6 million per felony. Per felony. Yeah. And if you do the math, people say he's not really a good business person, but by my calculations he invested 130,000 and he got a return of 53 million. That's some good investing. You know he doesn't get credit for that. So yeah, it's 1.6 million per felony. His per-indictment numbers are not as good, but I think they'll be improving as well. So I think we should be measuring Trump's donation gathering by felonies. So if he could get, I feel like he's only maybe 12 to 17 felonies away from having all the money he needs for the rest of the campaign. So I think we're like three or four felonies away from being really rich with cash. So there's that.
Trump also at the UFC announced that he's getting on TikTok now. You might know that I think that TikTok needs to be cancelled or divested into the US. But as long as it's there I guess I gotta agree with Vivek and with Trump. If it's there and it matters and it's a big way to reach voters, sure, why not?
All right. David Sacks and others are pointing out the lawfare double standard here that Hillary Clinton did similar things without penalty. So here's how David Sacks explains it. He calls it the business records double standard. In 2016 Hillary Clinton's campaign was fined $8,000. That was it. A fine of $8,000 for the following, for violating federal campaign finance laws. Why? Her team falsely reported the funding of the Steele dossier as legal services and legal and compliance consulting. Well what does that sound like? This sounds exactly like what Trump did. Exactly. What else do we know? According to Sacks, actually this opposition research was an attempt to smear her opponent with false and salacious allegations. Obviously it was also intended to influence the election. So she recorded it as a lawyer expense. But really no matter what she was thinking, because as Megyn Kelly explained on her video the other day, that it doesn't matter what anybody was thinking when they did the expense. It only matters that a reasonable person could look at it and say well there's more than one reason you would do that. So when Trump did his payments it didn't matter that he was thinking it was mostly about the election. This is Megyn Kelly's take. It had more to do with the fact that a reasonable person would say well there's more than one reason you would want that information not to get out. One's your family, one's your business reputation, and the other is political. So if everybody agrees that there were three reasons that should have been reason enough that he can't be convicted. You need one reason. If there's three it's just sort of automatically you're not guilty.
So Hillary obviously was putting this into legal expenses to hide her contribution to the hoax. Of course. Moreover, says Sacks, Hillary's campaign was headquartered in New York State and of Brooklyn, New York, which would make it fall under the jurisdiction of New York penal law 175.10, the state law which makes it a felony to falsify business records with the intent to conceal the commission of a crime. I feel like that Steele dossier thing was a crime, wasn't it? It should have been. I don't know, maybe it wasn't technically, but should have been. And then Sacks asks what the key distinction between Hillary's campaign violation versus recent news. And he concludes with Hillary's violation, there wasn't a Manhattan prosecutor politically motivated to bring an unprecedented case to trial.
Now as you know, people who in the past may have leaned left in their politics like Elon Musk, and I'm not sure where David Sacks was, but he's clearly in the anti-Biden train at the moment. So you see some people that you wouldn't expect to be anti-Biden who are clearly anti-Biden. But let's look at the rest of them because it's a growing thing and I think the dam's about to burst.
ABC News says this in a post. Like any other American found guilty of a crime, Donald Trump is likely to face new restrictions and lose a number of rights due to his newfound felon status. What about this choice of words, found guilty of a crime? Isn't that an interesting phrase? He was found guilty. Why wouldn't you just say guilty? Why wouldn't you just say now that he's a felon or now that the jury has concluded he's a felon? Why would you say that he was found guilty instead of guilty? Well let me put the hypnotist filter on it. As a hypnotist I was trained that people's choice of words reveals their thoughts and all the time it's really reliable. The choice of the words found guilty instead of just guilty. Now I do understand that found guilty is a common phrase and it wouldn't be surprising to see it used in other contexts. But where you have a choice and they obviously had a choice of any words that would tell the story, why would you put found guilty? Because found guilty has the odor of we know he's not really guilty but it is true that he was found guilty. It suggests that the ABC News person who wrote that post doesn't believe that he was guilty because they're watching the same thing we watched and it was lawfare. So look for that. Look for words that you say to yourself they had a choice of words and within all the words they could have chosen they picked the one that sends a flag. It's sort of a quiet signal.
But is there more? Well as you know, Elie Honig, who is one of the main legal minds on CNN, said the trial blew his mind and it's an unjustified mess. And basically Elie Honig dumped on the lawfare of it exactly as Republicans do. In other words in a purely factual way he just said it's lawfare garbage and it wouldn't have happened to anybody else. Now that's a big deal because he says that on CNN. He said it on his times on CNN and they're not taking him off the air. So CNN, I'm going to give them credit again. They do seem to be pivoting towards something like a reasonable middle. We don't want to get ahead of ourselves and say that it's going to be a completely clean situation, but I see the effort. I mean to me it looks like they're trying. Because remember also Fareed Zakaria said directly that unless your name was Donald Trump you never would have been charged with this crime. Now that is really clear. There's no vagueness in that. Fareed is saying all right, if you look at the situation this is dirty. I mean that's just as clear as you can be.
But it gets better. You know how many times I've told you that Smerconish is the least biased person on CNN? Well true to his brand he had Charlamagne tha God on. You know Charlamagne's doing a book tour. But Charlamagne is also famous for not being pro-Biden at the moment. He's not a lover of Trump but he's very clearly saying Biden's a mess. So Smerconish has him on there and asked if the verdict would change the outcome of the election. And here's what Charlamagne said. He said so it's really which candidate can energize their base and situations like this it does energize Trump's base. I see Biden's base upset with him over a number of things. I do think a situation like this gives them something to fight for, meaning the Trumpers.
Now I saw somebody say that they thought that Smerconish's face and body language suggested that he was going to explode like he didn't like seeing it. I would suggest that you're reading him completely wrong. Smerconish knew exactly what Charlamagne was going to say. I mean not exactly, but he knew what Charlamagne's message was. He invited him on the show. He wasn't surprised. He wanted his audience to hear Charlamagne's point of view. Just think about that. He intentionally invited somebody he knew was going to trash Biden, somebody who's black and is influential. Smerconish did that. Here's what I saw when I looked at Smerconish's face, and this is just subjective, right? But remember I have the perspective that I'm already biased that he's unbiased. The look that I saw on his face was just sort of like shock and amazement like the rest of us. So I think he was just trying to keep a poker face but I think he was having a reaction to it but not the reaction that he hated hearing it. I think it was a reaction of the moment we're in is a big moment.
So what happens when all of those people associated with CNN turn completely on the story and agree with the Republicans? Well they're not the only ones. Alan Dershowitz, a famous Democrat, says Trump was unjustly convicted. This worst case in 60 years should never have been brought and the public should see the judge's outrageous behavior. Now that's pretty clear. Dershowitz is not saying I don't know, you could see this both ways. Nope. One of the most experienced and capable legal minds in the country, a Democrat, said no, this is totally crooked. Totally crooked. Obviously crooked. Every part of this is crooked.
Now I've taught you before that if one of the major networks, let's say CNN or MSNBC, say something is a fact but then you go to the conservative outlets, let's say Breitbart or Fox News, and they say it's not a fact or vice versa, one of them says it's true and the other one says not, it's usually not. Or let me put it a better way, you can't tell if it's true. It's just two versions. Now if you could, you know there's some objective facts that they show you that you can make up your own mind. That's different. But you don't really know if something's true if they disagree in their normal way they disagree. But it's unusual that CNN and Fox News for example would be on the same page about anything. And they're on the same page that this was lawfare and it was a completely rigged system, which is phenomenal.
But here's the best part. Some of you know the name Naval Ravikant, founder of AngelList and one of the most prominent investors and thinkers in Silicon Valley. What you might not know about him is that he's famously non-political, famously does a lot of tweeting. He's one of the most quoted people in philosophy and technology at the moment, success, a lot of different domains. So he's generally considered, I've actually called him the smartest person I've ever met. So let me say that again. The smartest person I've ever met. Do you know how many smart people I've met? Quite a few, right? So and I'll stay with that. You might be the smartest person I've ever met. Now here I'm calling smart not just depth but breadth. He can tell you the better take on more topics than any human being I've ever met and it'll be a different take and it'll be better than one you had on so many different topics. It's crazy.
All right, so when he talks there are enough people, certainly in the investment world, in the technical world, he's well known. So when he says anything that kind of strays from his non-political stance your ears just go wait, what did I just hear? And here's what he said. He put two of Biden's posts on X next to each other. And one of them was about Biden bragging that he ignored the Supreme Court to get student loans cancelled. And then the next one was where he was saying that nobody's above the law after the one where he said he got around the law. So Naval quotes a famous quote from I think some South American dictator type. And he said just this and nothing else. Quote, for my friends everything, for my enemies the law. Now the way that quote is taken is that when he says for my enemies the law he doesn't mean just if they broke the law. That's the important part. He means you can use the law to get rid of enemies and that's just the tool you use. And that is what we are observing.
So now CNN has made it safe for the least political person in all of public life to tell you that the former president of the United States is getting lawed right in front of you. Now to you this might seem like a small deal but I don't think you quite understand how much persuasive influence Naval has on the smartest people in Silicon Valley. He is so respected that when he puts down a stake, and I would say that he put down a stake that this is too far to get him to talk about anything in the political domain and to make a direct statement about it, this is pretty direct, is extraordinary. I think the dam is about to break. I think CNN's already broken. I think the investors in Silicon Valley, they're all going to turn. The All-In podcast is all in. Elon Musk is all in. Naval, he just broke a long tradition and I'm sure he thought about it for a long time before he did it. Something's happening that's bigger than anything you could imagine. It's not obvious yet but wow, you can feel it. That the feeling that things have gone too far is so strong right now. Yeah, the energy is very different.
And here's the part that I was saving for you. Do you know what Judge Merchan's first name is? How many of you know his first name just off the top of your head? Have you ever heard it? His first name is Juan. Yeah, Juan Merchan. That's the judge that's going to jail Trump probably. Do you know where he was born? Colombia. Country of Colombia. Yeah. Judge Merchan was born in Colombia. He's an immigrant. The judge that's judging Trump is an immigrant from below the border. Does that sound like the right choice? The most famous build the wall, keep the South Americans where they are of all time, and his judge is one of the people that would have presumably the biggest problem with that kind of attitude. Gets better. His father was a military officer in Colombia, military officer for a while, and then he later served in Colombia's intelligence services. Huh. Colombia. What do we know about Colombia? What do we know about their military? What do we know about the Colombian intelligence services? Let's see. Some people would say that Colombia and the government and the military are tightly connected with the cartels, some would say. And some would say that the cartels are tightly linked with the American CIA, some would say.
So let me ask you this. If you were the CIA and you knew that Trump didn't even use your services for intelligence and you knew that he was talking about, and other Republicans like Tucker were talking about, eliminating the CIA and all of your jobs and you wanted to stop him, who would be the best pick to do that? Well I would go with Juan Merchan, father military officer from Colombia who once worked in their intelligence services, somehow made it to the United States as an immigrant and built quite a good life. That's who I'd pick. So now I'm not going to make an allegation because I don't know anything about his father. But why does it look exactly like you would think it would look if the worst case scenario were true and that the whole thing is the CIA and is fixed? Why does it look exactly like that? Is that a coincidence? Can we write that off to coincidence that it looks exactly like a CIA operation? Now again I'm only making unfair inferences about people who are known to be the types of people who associate with other types of people. So that's a big, I don't want to go further than that because that would be defamation. So I'm not going to make a claim that I know it's true. I'm just asking. Just asking. Don't you hate that? I'm curious why there's such a big coincidence involved, especially when we know that his selection was supposed to be random but clearly wasn't because he got three Trump cases in a row, all three.
So is it exactly what it looks like? And in the meantime we hear the people who are part of the deep state saying that Merchan is going to recommend jail time despite the fact that nobody would get jail time for this if they were not Trump. And the argument was because Trump was sort of had a bad attitude and violated the gag order so therefore they would send him to jail. That's the argument. And on CNN one of the legal guys was testing that argument out. That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. At the same time there's a movement to change the law so he can't get Secret Service protection while he's in jail so he can be killed.
Now I was talking with one of my online buddies just before I went live and I mentioned that it looked like on the surface it looks like they're trying to kill him. And he didn't understand that I meant that literally. He thought I meant figuratively. No, literally. Now I'm not going to say I know that that's the case. I'm going to say if I were going to put odds on it I'd say it's a 50 percent chance that there's an active plan by our government to kill Trump. I think it's at least a 50 percent chance. And the reason I say that is that we lived through Epstein. If there had never been an Epstein, if there had never been a Kennedy who got assassinated, if we didn't see that RFK Jr. also doesn't get Secret Service protection for no good reason, I would have said okay our government doesn't do things like that. But clearly they do things like that. So yes, they have an existential risk to their jobs if Trump becomes the president again. And what would they do if they are the dirty tricks group of the country? The people who are selected by their willingness to break rules. The CIA is selected by their willingness to do illegal things, at least the operators are, because they're doing illegal things in other countries. You could argue that it's still legal in our country if they do illegal things and it's authorized by our country. But that's sort of cutting it fine. I mean they're basically people who signed up for yeah I'll go do super illegal things, that'll be my job. And that way we would assume that they wouldn't do super illegal things when it's the very group that's been selected because they like to do or at least they're willing to do super illegal things. No, it's at least a 50 percent chance that they're trying to kill him. Don Jr. says the same thing. It's not crazy. It is well within the parameters of what we've seen. If I'd never seen the lawfare happen then I'd say well the courts are fair. No they're not. To me it looks like the court case is driven by the same people who are apparently, if you look at it on the surface, on the surface it looks exactly like a murder plot with a statistical element, which is maybe they don't know for sure he'll be killed in prison but they think there's a good chance. So anyway that's scary.
Over on MSNBC, the stupid network, representative Bowman is on there. He says if you stay home and you do not exercise the power of your vote you're giving your power to white supremacist MAGA individuals. You know where the white supremacist MAGA individuals are because I've never really seen one on the news. But I'm going to take a guess. I think they're up in the mountains with the white supremacist militia that's forming. They're hiding away with the black guy who can't figure out how to get an ID to vote. And well you get it. You get the idea.
Vivek had an interesting legal take. I don't know if I'm buying it yet but it's interesting. He says that Trump can be pardoned by a president for his New York conviction even though it's a state matter. Normally a president can only pardon or commute for something that was a federal offense. You can't do it for a state charge. And Trump was charged and convicted by the state. However the state's charges depended entirely upon the fact that there were also federal violations per their case. So if you were to pardon Trump from the federal part of it it would make the state part of it dissolve because the state part of it depended on the federal part. So even though the federal part was not really what the state found they still relied on the jury thinking a federal thing had been violated so that they could apply the state thing to the higher level crime of felony because it supported the other charge or vice versa. One supported the other. I forget which way it went. But I don't know if I buy that. It sounds right but I feel like there might be an alternative legal theory about whether that's practical. I like the thinking. And once again if it's true, if it's true, how did we get this far and why did Vivek have to be the one to bring it up because he went to a little bit of law school? So he's the only one to have figured it out. Man, do we need him in the government. We need him so much, right? Even if he's wrong on this at least he came up with this and that's pretty good anyway.
So yeah, I do think Vivek is the primary thing that could keep Trump alive if they wanted to be vice president and got nominated for that. Because he's the one that I think the CIA would be most afraid of who not named Trump. So I think he's the way to keep Trump alive. It would be wild if Trump nominated Vivek for vice president and said directly you know what, some other people were my top choice but Vivek will keep me alive. Can you imagine that? Because it was real. It's real. But he could say that directly. You know if Vivek didn't want the job, he wanted to have a different role. I had somebody else in mind but honestly he's the one who's going to keep me alive. I'd love to hear him say that directly.
All right, getting back into the Soros mystery. I asked why is it that Soros is doing what he's doing and I wanted other people to explain it to me like I'm an idiot so I could understand why Soros would be funding so many things that seem disastrous for the country that he lives in. Why would you destroy the country that you live in? Now I'm being called naive and uninformed. And here's what I heard from a user online. That Soros supports anarcho-tyranny, all the things we're seeing in the country, because he believes, now this is the mind-reading part, because he believes in a globalist agenda that transcends national borders. And it wouldn't matter that he's a citizen of the United States because Soros's preference would be that states go away and he'll do fine because he's rich. That ain't it. That ain't it. I feel like this is an analysis that comes from people who have never been rich. May I give you my rich guy analysis? It's the only one you should listen to. Because Soros is rich. If you're not hearing the opinion from somebody also rich, I mean I don't have anything like his money but I've experienced going from poor to being wealthy. It changes you. And here's the thing you want the least if you're on top. So right now he's sitting at the pinnacle of human beings. You don't want that to change. If you're at the top the last thing you want in a risk-reward world, the last thing you want is to change the whole system that you're dominating at the top. That introduces a risk of total collapse that would take him from the top to not the top. It could make every dollar he owns worth nothing, right? So being in the top 1 percent, let me tell you for sure because I'm in it, I don't want the whole system to change dramatically in any way. Now do I think that the whole system should be changed dramatically? Yeah, I can think of lots of ways. But I would want to do them carefully and without changing the general structure of what got me to where I am. The last thing I want is to have the country thrown into chaos and then I have to figure out how to create a good situation from scratch. I'm already in a good situation. If you've never experienced going from uncertainty and economic low income to a place where you would call yourself wealthy, when you get there the last thing you want to do is change the whole world into something you don't even know what will happen. Nobody does that. And among the group of the nobodies who would do that, the top, top, top, the very number one person who wouldn't do that is a person who's famous for being good at risk analysis. That's what Soros is famous for. He's apparently unusually good at risk analysis. Nobody with risk analysis ability destroys the whole system without a replacement. You know that's right. Online nobody does that. So the idea that he's in favor of destroying all the borders and forming a global network is crazy.
Now here's the other thing. If a globalist one-world government were to be formed, have you thought through who would be in charge? That have you lived in the real world at all? If you form a real world government of the top richest people like actually an official government they would just fight with each other. It would be like the Democrats and the Republicans. They would be fighting the fight of all fights when none of them need a fight. All the billionaires are already the champions of the world. They can do whatever they want. They can affect governments easily. Why would they change their situation dramatically? And if they did why do you think Soros would be the top billionaire? Don't you think he would get demoted as likely as promoted? It would be the craziest, riskiest, chaotic thing to ever do if you are already at the top.
The next thing is that people say he's doing it for money. Scott, you don't understand. He destroys countries and then he bets against their currencies and then he makes a whole bunch of money. Now I need a fact check on this but am I crazy or is Soros trying to give away his money? My understanding is he's trying to donate most of it. In the context of trying to give away most of your money you're not doing gigantic terrible illegal things to make more money. It doesn't even make sense. How does any of that make sense? So whatever is going on here I have no idea. I have no idea. I just know that the simplistic explanations of a globalist one-world government don't track at all with who Soros is. And I'm not reading his mind. I'm saying that nobody in that situation would want that choice. Nor have you ever heard anybody. Show me a billionaire who really wants governments to go away and have one world government. I don't think there are any. And definitely not him because he's good at risk management and nobody would do that. It would be crazy anyway. So that's still a mystery.
Let's talk about the Israel peace deal. As I told you on day one it was always fake. So there's not really a peace deal that anybody's going to take too seriously. But it looks like Israel's going to buy some time. I don't know how long it will take to get whatever they need done in Rafah but it's probably a few months. You don't think that they can stall negotiations for two months? Of course they can. Of course they can.
The World Economic Forum is even the more ridiculous theory. Yeah, I think Elon Musk is right about them being a club for rich people. If Elon Musk isn't worried and he's about as close to the inside of the world as anybody could be and he seems totally unconvinced there's any danger there and I agree with him completely. I think it's just a club for rich people.
Meanwhile in Ukraine, Russia's trying to bomb Kharkiv. What is the second biggest city? It's not Kiev. It's Kharkiv. I forget anyway. It looks like the Russians are trying to take out their vital services and depopulate it before they do anything bigger. So it looks like the current method of taking over a city in a military way is the American and Israeli version has a little more boots on the ground. The Russian version is we'll go in when there's nothing left. Kharkiv. Thank you. The city is Kharkiv. Anyway, not much happening there besides the usual badness.
That by the way concludes my comments for today. Sorry I ran long again. I'm going to say bye to YouTube and Rumble and X. I'm going to talk to the good folks on Locals privately, the subscribers. And I'll see the rest of you tomorrow. Hope you enjoyed the show. Bye for now. Locals, hold on.
B d good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams and you've never had a better day and let me tell you the Omens are all lining up for an amazing amazing day probably the best you've ever seen now let's see there I am no huh I still don't see the feed all right it would be live that's where it would be there I am we're live well if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their tiny human smooth brains all you need for that is a cup or marker glass or tanker Chell Stein the Cen suar flas us a but kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the immediately of the day thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it's going to happen now ah powering up you know what I feel like I feel so good I feel like an outlaw yeah that's how good I feel how am I feeling felonius yeah felonius it's a great feeling all right let's talk about the news today's Dilbert reborn shows you in the first panel I posted it on X um you can see that I designed it with AI so the first panel of the dilber comic I used AI to tell me some interesting camera angles or perspectives uh for a guy on his computer when a dog walks into the room now ai can't produce my characters because it'll complain about copyright and stuff but it can give me a generic guy and a generic dog and then when I have the angle of all the furniture I just replace them with my characters so you can you can see how that worked out you gave a a new angle that i' had never used before so that's my first I think my first re life world repeatable I'll definitely use it again AI assist to writing my daily comic so it's sort of a a milestone well apparently there's a Tesla deal being worked out to give Elon Musk his money that they gave him and then took away from him the courts took away and uh the only portion that he would be able to use for 5 years is to pay the taxes that he would owe if he were to get it right away so so apparently you can't just take the money and run some people were worried about that uh he'd have to stay there for five years to get his money so should make the stockholders a little bit happy if he has to stay there and work for another five years so we'll see we hope he gets his money um there's a gigantic Wall Street Journal says there a huge cost saving technology for making solar panels now you've heard this story a billion times but this one sounds pretty promising I didn't realize that China can make solar panels at roughly half the price of an American manufacturer uh but with this new technology it should close that Gap a lot and apparently it's not just theoretical it looks like it's you know ready to put into the system yeah I won't get into the technical details but it's a you know it reduces the amount of silver they need makes something thinner than before and um would reduce the cost substantially and I ask you again which one of the climate models takes into account um technical innovations that totally change the curve none because you can't put in a climate model the thing that hasn't been invented yet and yet we know there'll be tons of things invented between now and you know when they imagine the Bur the Earth is going to burn up so if you don't put human invention in your 100-year model is that credible think about how different the world is in any 20year period you know it's the difference between Ai and no AI computers and no computers smartphones and no smartphones 20 years is a long time so these climate models are absurd in leaving out probably the biggest variable I mean you think if you're looking at climate change the biggest variable is the CO2 or the Sun or the ocean but probably the biggest variable is human Innovation it's not even in the model right tell me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure that the models assume that we don't innovate for the rest of humankind we just sort of die all right uh so that's happening uh here's the scariest coolest thing there's a Swiss startup that has made a computer and of brain organoids now I don't know what an organoid is but I'm going to guess it's something like an artificial brain that they built in a Petri dish or a tube or something so I don't think it came from a human I hope you know maybe the cells did or something uh but they now have in the real world apparently you can connect to this thing if you're if you're paying them uh and it consumes a million times less power than regular digital processors and it's fast let me say that again there will be a data center a data center this is already Real by the way this is not speculative this is today functioning there's uh human brain parts that they've somehow connected to a digital interface and they use the human brain part to do the calculating at 1 million times less power than regular stuff do you think there's any way that if it works and it can be reproduced that it does work as so it's already up and running so if it could be reproduced as scale who in the world is going to pay for regular computing when you can have a computer to get a million times less power we are building a human brain SL cyborg the Borg I don't know it it's super cool but also super whoo because you don't know what could go wrong wait a minute how many ways could it go wrong if we start building human brain organoid computers I don't know I I guess a raises questions I'm not afraid of it per se but raises a lot of questions well NASA had to once again delay it's uh an astronaut crude flight of what would be the Boeing starliners I think First Flight with astronauts and I didn't see the reason that the flight was scrubbed but I have a theory it's a bowing Starliner and I think the problem is you know how jur sometimes are sequestered yeah if the jury is going to go home sometimes the judge will say oh you can't go home you have to stay you know away from any influence because you don't want them reading the news they might act differently the jurors if they read the news you want them to stick to just the trial data and I'm starting to think that the uh the astronauts for the boing Starliner maybe they should have been sequestered for the last month to maybe not see any news about Boeing's quality control lately um so I worry that the reason it's delayed is that the astronauts were watching the news and said um I think I've got a cold or something I I'm not sure I can go oh oh my arm so something's going wrong here I I'll never be able to control it maybe you better use the backup I don't know I'm just joking all right did you know that China's labor costs are about double that of Philippines Malaysia India Thailand and Vietnam I'll tell you you think that the United States has trouble you think we have problems we do but how would you like to be China and your entire situation depends on manufacturing because it's the backbone of the economy and your twice as expensive as the Alternatives and everybody has a gigantic incentive to get their business out of there what are they going to do now besides the fact that you know these countries have half the cost and they presumably they're building up some infrastructure so they can be serious competitors to China but I also haven't heard about Mexico I don't know what the cost of Labor is in Mexico compared to China and I also don't know what's going to happen with robots because if we're making these much um much cheaper solar panels and then we get rid of the labor by putting robots in the factories so so you use a manufacturing process that drops the price by I don't know half and then you put in robots that take another 25% off the price or something like that um I tell you that if there's a way to invest in solar um I'm not recommending you invest in it because I don't make I don't make recommendations for Investments but it does seem like maybe there's something that's going to happen here that could be gigantic you don't really think of robots influencing energy except to use it you know they use a lot of energy but they're going to be building the solar panels and the solar plants and the solar everything and probably the uh nuclear power plants too soon all right so there's a story that we don't know what the real story is but Alex Jones is going through something that looks bad now he's saying that the feds came to his door and they were trying to lock him out and take all of his stuff and close him down but he was also acting let's say I'm could to say emotional if if it were somebody I didn't like I would use other words but since I I like him you know he was nice to me he's had me on the show and when somebody's nice to me in person I can't really just go in public and then trash him like it just I'm just not built that way so because I've met him in person and he was very generous to me um I'll I'll say that he's having an emotional reaction that we don't quite understand some people say it's mental health some people say it's substance some people say it's both some people say get an up some people say um and I think his staff has backed him up by the way his staff is on the same P page so it's not just him what whatever is going on his staff seems to have witnessed as well so I don't know who these feds were or what exactly they were trying to do except that it's in the context of everybody who is pro Trump getting a hit so I don't know what's going on but keep an eye on it um he may need some help in any variety of ways we we don't know what the problem is but he's clearly in a crisis situation and so if you you know have any interest in in either his operation or him as a human being um have a little bit of empathy and uh keep an eye on that maybe there's way you can help one way or another all right uh Mexico here here's a story that snuck up on me uh imagine finding this out today this is kind of mindblowing the next president of Mexico is likely to do to be a Jewish woman is this the first time you hearing that I I heard it today so apparently they're having an election the sitting president can't run again they have one-term presidents six years and the the mentor some somebody who's worked closely with the current president so he's recommending her and that's the reason she's getting her her push Claudia shine bomb a Jewish woman with a PhD in Energy Engineering that that's about as perfect as you can get isn't that how would you like to be the president of Mexico you're coming in with a PhD in Energy Engineering but it gets better she's bilingual she used to live in the Bay area she used to live in the Bay Area she's bilingual the current president of Mexico is not bilingual do you think that makes a difference hell yes hell yes language is the big uniter right if you can talk to somebody in the same language it's a whole different experience right you that's how you Bond you don't really bond with Putin if he can't speak your language or she uh but wouldn't it be nice to have somebody we could work with in the same language who's PhD in Energy Engineering now we we all assume that the cartels have undue influence on the governments so there's that but are you also surprised that Mexico would be even considering apparently she's way ahead in the polls it looks like it's a lock um very popular did you see a female president of Mexico coming anytime soon it's it's kind of interesting and impressive and this is the Dei you want you know what I mean th this is diversity done correctly as far as I can tell the only reason she's being considered is that she's overwhelmingly qualified so how about that H how about just being overwhelmingly qualified and then getting the top job okay I'm good with that so at least on paper she looks like exactly the person that America would want that job as well as the Mexicans so maybe something Goods coming out that and there there is talk that Mexico's um going to have an economic boom like you've never seen before because remember the manufacturing is moving toward it that's a good sign and they've got some major infrastructure things like maybe a railroad and some other stuff that will connect the resorts and turn it into more of a a well-engineered destination so all that's happening if the cartels don't derail things um there's something good that could happen now I've said this before but here's what I think is the only hope for living with Mexico I'm seeing somebody mocking me for quote believing in solar let's pretend that you know what you're talking about now did you think I was unaware that there's a waste problem of course there is of course there is am I unaware that people are not good at calculating you know the relative cost and benefits in the future of different technological options I used to do that work I know it can't be done it used to be my job to calculate expenses in the future you can't really do that it was my job but I couldn't do it and nobody can do it so do I think that do I know what the economics of solar power will be next year no I don't you know what but do you know what I do know that the person who is mocking me you don't know no you're an idiot who thinks you know the expenses of Technologies you've never been involved with because you read a article somewhere right I'm smart enough to know that I don't know what will be the competing cost structures 20 years from now which is what you have to think about right it's not what it is today it's if you start a project what does your nuclear power plant cost in 10 years when you're done with it you know what is your solar plant and your gigafactory or your your Giga storage thing what is it cost in 10 or 20 years nobody knows that if if you think you know it dear troll commenter well you're the smartest person in the world according to you because you know what can't be no known good for you did you know about this story about the technology that would lower the cost of solar did you read that this morning before I did all right enough about you uh Tucker Carlson's uh being uh really outspoken uh on his video recently said uh nothing is ever about our safety and that all the big political stuff is you know clearly about the interests of the people in power he said this country in the world only changes when we eliminate the CIA it'll take someone willing to be assassinated he gives examples he said you open the southern border to anyone who wants to come in you're not checking IDs you're not doing any kind of Biometrics you're not even screening for Co so clearly you don't care about my safety check check check correct yes there is no evidence that the people in power of our country are interested in the wellbeing of the citizens there is plenty of evidence the open border that they're operating against against our interests in reason for reasons we don't quite understand I don't understand it we'll talk about more of that later but uh he's saying directly that the CIA has to be cancelled completely I saw ex CIA uh operative agent whatever you want to call them uh also on Tucker show saying that when Trump was the president he didn't use the CIA as much as he used private intelligence people to tell them what was going on why would he do that why would you pay somebody to do the job of the CIA when the CIA is already being paid and therefore it's free you know on a incremental basis why would you do that I can only think of one reason that the president of the United States did not think that the CIA was on the same side as he was in other words Trump the person who knew the most about the CIA while in office had the most access didn't believe that he could trust them with the security of the United States you have to eliminate them under that situation if a sitting president doesn't think they're even on the same side not even on the same side you that's you can't live with that so if you can buy these services on the open market and you don't trust the ones in the government there is an argument for eliminating the CIA and it's strong you know you'd have to hear the other side and I'm not sure they can tell the other side because it'd be full of secrets but is there a surfacy argument that says getting rid of the CIA the most that's a pretty radical thing to do is there an argument for it yeah there is you know there was a time when the CIA was you know overthrowing governments and doing all kinds of things to uh help America control the world and you could have at that time said I don't like America doing all these other things in other countries uh so I don't like the CIA but there would have been a good argument to keep them because the let me let me make the Mak valian power argument here wouldn't it be nice if the United States left all the other countries alone and left them to pursue their best interest for their people until they become thriving democracies and allies of us in the future once they' have used their own free will and their own resources to become an independent country that could be like a strong Ally for us no not in the real world in the real world if we didn't take them over somebody else would have right China would have taken them because whoever has money can control any small entity whether it's a country uh a politician uh or another country yeah any other country so it doesn't take much money to overthrow a country you just bribe the right people and there you go yeah you maybe you could bribe 50 people to overthrow any country and they're probably all bribable so you know the the levers are there for over for controlling other countries but here's my argument the mellan argument for the CIA they might be complete bastards who are doing terrible things to other countries every day but if they didn't what would happen somebody else would and then we would be surrounded by countries that let's say China had a lot of control over that's no good so the thing is that the the worst let's or best let me say the best criminal wins we don't live in a world where there's good versus evil there's just evil versus evil at the government level humans tend to be closer to good you know if you leave them alone they're more likely to be good to each other because we're sort of tribal we grew up that way but countries are evil as soon as you have a country it's probably corrupt no matter who it is uh so maybe the strongest criminal organization is the one you want to be with the strongest criminal organization at the moment America appears to be the strongest criminal organization which might be your safest situation in a historical sense historically you just wanted to be in the strongest country and it didn't matter why they were the strongest right don't you think you were safer being a Roman citizen when Rome was at its peak without supporting that Rome were good guys they weren't good guys but it was probably the safest place to live in those times you know to be a Roman citizen so we're sort of the Roman citizens it feels like to me so yes there's an argument that the CIA works against our interests but I'd like to hear the counterargument I just don't know anybody can make it because you'd have to say what I said yeah we're kind of criminals we do terrible things every single day you wouldn't even want to know what we're doing in your name but it keeps you safer because we're the best criminals that might be the argument and I could be convinced by that I hate it but it's a world in which sometimes your best choice is also terrible don't know all right well but uh the keep in mind that Tucker's father was in the CIA I believe and and he often thinks that um I mean he has a good he has a good window into that world so I take his opinion seriously oh trolls uh being really extra stupid in public is not hurting me it's just amusing me yeah it's just amusing me so thanks say say some more really dumb things about the future of technology to entertain the rest of the commenters they would like to see your stupidity in full flower so say some more irrational things please all right let's talk about the hooc crcy as you know the Biden uh campaign is built entirely on hoaxes from the fine people hoax to the Trump tear Gast peaceful protesters hoax and lot more drinking bleach it's one hoax after another and the Biden Harris headquarters uh X um the X account um said four years ago today Trump tiar guest peaceful protesters outside the White House well it took about a minute before Joel Pollock fact checked them hard and nope that was all debunked by sources that Democrats trust as well as as Republicans so why is it that the campaign can be so blatant about something that's been fact jacked and very clearly didn't happen I mean absolutely did not happen and it's well known their their Their audience is so underinformative course they know it's a lie but they know it works so they're going to say it anyway I'm not so sure I'm not so sure I I think that the Biden Harris campaign is so Dei crippled that the level of incompetence there you can't really assume that it's normal it's probably extraordinary and if you're new to my commentary let me quickly add we're not talking about anybody's genes or culture that's not in the conversation about Dei Dei is a system it's not a person it's not a person it's a system and the system moves people around like little chess players and there aren't enough chess players for what they need to do so they meet their diversity targets whether they have qualified candidates or not because humans always meet the targets that they're measured on and their performances judged upon and that big thing they're judged on so if you assume that Dei as a system is guaranteed to fail because the pipeline of qualified people would be smaller than the demand forcing them to take lesser and lesser qualified people just to meet their diversity goals and if you assume that Democrats don't have an option they have to be diverse it's their brand so they're forced to be diverse but they're demonstrating to the rest of the world through what I would consider the most incompetent administration of all time and the most incompetent campaign and the most incompetent spokesperson and all of those things are permeated with Dei hires which if they were qualified to do their jobs you would see a better job yeah I'm not talking about one thing that I'm criticizing that did there there's a pervasive incompetence in the current government like we've never really seen before and the campaign is so obviously incompetent and they're so obviously backing the wrong guy that um this is sort of a the Biden campaign is basically your Canary in the coal mine for every corporation right they just got to diversity faster because they're so public they really had to companies are also trying to go as fast as they can but you can see what happens when you get to uh Dei diversity goals when you have a a limited pipeline of qualified people again because of systemic racism at the school level just not producing enough diverse candidates so uh yeah the hoax campaign and the Dei uh incompetence uh should bring down the whole house in a few months I I'm expecting a complete um demolition of the Biden campaign I think we're close to the point where the whole thing's just going to come off the rails in a way we've never seen before maybe a whistleblower we'll see I I was watching a body language expert look at the two faces of Biden because that's sort of becoming a thing and the one the one face is his uh Angry troll face that looks like a cat's all puckered up you know You' know look oh his face is all squeezed like all all of his face meets in his nose you one little puckered place and then you see his wide-eyed open vessel so he's got the demon look where he looks demon-possessed and then in the same talk sometimes he'll have the empty vessel where his wde eyes are wide open and his mouth is forming that Hillary Clinton looking at balloons drop and you say to yourself how in the world is that the same person and we still don't know I love the fact that he's clearly two different people I mean I think it's the same organic person but there's something that causes him to be a different personality so much so he doesn't even look the same not even a little bit I mean you can generally recognize as Biden but it's you would think it's is a different person if they stood next to each other so here are the possibilities one is drugs one is mental illness one is some kind of a deep fake thing but I don't think so and one is maybe there's something about editing for example you've seen all the quick edits they've done on his videos could it be that they have to take so much time off between edits that he let takes a nap and just recovers and he wakes up and his eyes are open and he he's the morning version could it be that we're seeing Morning Joe hey Morning Joe get it could it be that when we see Morning Joe he's a little bit uh more lucid and that when we see uh you know evening Joe that he's declined into his dementia yelling puckered face something like that whatever is going on is really bad it's not good whatever it is all right um I can't wait for the first interview with the imaginary Republican who's not going to vote for Trump because the law fair got him have any of you met that person yet I mean I'm I'm being told often and reliably by all the polls that people have decided that since Trump got convicted by a unfair trial that therefore they're not going to vote for him so we're all waiting to see the person right you know where I think that person is I don't know but I think the imaginary Republican who's not going to vote for Trump because of lawfare could be hanging out and partying with the black American voter who didn't know how to get an ID I think they're together cuz we can't find either one of them and I think maybe they're helping each other hide so somewhere maybe in cabins possibly possibly in the mountains uh where the mega supremacists are are gathering their imaginary armies so it could be that the imaginary Mega supremacist army armies that are in the hills are creating a sanctuary for the imaginary Republicans who say they won't vote for Trump but maybe also I'd like to say that they're diverse and that they've included the black Americans who don't who who want to vote and know enough about the world that they think voting makes sense yet can't figure out how to get an ID yeah we know they exist we were told they exist we've never talked to one we've never seen one but the Democrats are quite sure the imaginary Army in the hill and the imaginary Republicans who don't like Trump now and the imaginary guy who can't get an ID they're all real and what about the uh imaginary events that they're running on every part of the Democrat platform is imaginary all the hoaxes are imaginary all the data that they give us about their current performance completely imaginary they say they're controlling the Border everything's fine that's imaginary what about a money that they're spending is Biden spending real money not anymore when you have $35 trillion in debt whatever it is that you're spending is imaginary because who whoever lent it to you they ain't getting it back so we've got an imaginary economy imaginary data we've got real problems that they imagine or not they've got an imaginary Trump who's in in their imagination tried to take over on January 6 and they imagined that he would do it again even though he never did it they think he'll do again the thing he never did once so we have imaginary policies imaginary people imaginary Trump in the future imaginary data do Republicans do that could could you reverse the argument and say oh Scott I see your point but look at all the imaginary things that the uh Republicans believe now maybe you would go after religion if you were not religious you'd say oh they believe in imaginary stuff but is it imaginary to think that your 9-month-old fetus is sort of alive is that imaginary that doesn't seem imaginary you could you could differ on you know what you think about it or what the law should be but it's not imaginary right the debt is not imaginary the lawfare is not imaginary even CNN's analysts are saying it's real so the the here's what I think has happened I think the Democrats uh sort of tiptoed into the imaginary world and it worked because they can control the the press for at least their base they can tell them literally anything and once they realize that you can tell them anything and the actual reality won't make any difference because they also control the fact Checkers they realize that going fully imaginary is a better strategy and I agree by the way it's a better strategy because they don't have anything of substance Trump has substance he can say you see all that crime uh I'm going to do the normal things that people normally do to get less of it is that imaginary I don't think so seems pretty real he says he's going to negotiate with Putin and zalinski to end the war now it might be hard but is it imaginary it's not imaginary and the entire reason we're in Ukraine do you think the government told you the real reason that we're in Ukraine no they gave you an imaginary reason the imaginary reason is that Putin's going to roll up Russia or that Putin's going to roll up Europe if if he gets Ukraine you know with no regard to the fact that some of us know the history of Ukraine and that as Mike Ben can explain better that the whole thing looks like an energy play between two criminal organizations one United States and the other Russia and uh basically it's like we're stealing their their drug stash so we can sell it ourselves their energy that's a better way to look at it so I can't think of anything the Democrats are doing that isn't imaginary because once you realize that your imaginary case will always be stronger than the real world one why would you ever use the real world it's unnecessary they've actually found a way to depart from all reality without paying for it it's free because as long as their press keeps backing them their own people will never go read Breitbart you know the Democrats will never you know go over to Fox News just to see what the other people say although surprisingly Fox News does have a lot of democrat viewers but I feel like they might be conservatives all right let's go on to some more uh this is going to get better as I go by the way I I've uh organized my materials so that I'm going to reach a crescendo so don't leave before the crescendo that'd be crazy all right uh so disgraced da Elvin brag I like I like just using disgraced in front of everything all right um so there there seems to be a whole bunch of trolls on You.
Tube uh all the behavior of social media look suspicious now you that like I don't believe that the trolls are organic anymore at least not during the election season they're they're really active and they're yelling well they're yelling imaginary things so the trolls are literally saying imaginary things about me to try to you know embarrass me on my own live stream let's see who would do that imaginary things what group of people really really really love imaginary stuff it's probably exactly what you think it is all right um so here's something I didn't know about Alvin Bragg he went to Harvard are you telling me that all the times that people have been ripping on Alvin Bragg nobody thought to mock him for having a degree from Harvard come on people improve your game it's not for it's not for me to help you avoid these mistakes no it's funny it's funny you went to Harvard now to be fair um not recently so maybe he went to Harvard back when uh it made a difference what your credentials were if he had just graduated from Harvard I would be saying you know Dei hire because you know Harvard's become ridiculous about their standards but maybe when he was there it was closer to you know he belonged there so I don't know I'm not going to say he didn't belong in Harvard because there was a time when Harvard was at least a little bit credible uh but according to my uh digital um creature from Amazon whose name I don't want to say out loud because I'll trigger it he has a net worth of $41 million but I didn't see that explained do you think it's true so first of all I don't know it's true it's just coming from you know the digital assistant so somebody could have put wrong information on there but is he independently wealthy and how so I guess I would ask for a fact check on that I do not assert that to be true just to be clear I do not assert that it's true but it's on at least one source of information so I'm curious about that did you know that Michigan uh they were looking at a law to make it harder to cheat but the Democrats had the advantage and they passed laws to make it easier to cheat right it's 2024 and in Michigan the state the Democrats unanimously passed legislation that would make it easier to cheat not harder can you think of a reason why they do that do you think they're planning on an imaginary election where you imagine that you knew the results but really you don't well that's what I'd worry about uh that was from the Gateway pundit they're reporting uh also Gateway P pundit is saying that there's some poll of Arab American voters and Biden is way off in his popularity um he had a 60% Arab American vote in 2020 but he's down to about 20% support now I don't think the Arab American Community is big enough that it's going to move the election but wow I think it's one more sign of complete collapse uh I don't think we realize how close the Democrat Party is to Total collapse because until it happens it doesn't look like it's going to happen you know thing nothing happens until something happens so I feel like you know the major tent pole holding up the Democrats is really creaky right now and if that one cracks uh the rest go do you know what the tent pole is that holds up the entire Democrat Party it's the fine people hoax if the fine people hoax can be debunked so that Democrats can see it in a way that's you know credible um that takes everything away and the fact that the Republicans don't go after that you know lot basically just people like me pundits do I never really understood that anyway uh Tim P abruptly cut the his own live stream uh because he had Laura lumer as a guest and Laura lomer was talking about you know getting getting back at Democrats and that there was enough crime there that if you know Trump got back in office there would be a number of people who should be dealt with with the legal process however I think her rhetoric um reached a point where Tim P's entire show was probably at risk if he didn't pull it down himself so I'm going to give Tim p a big a big compliment nicely done nicely done so I'll tell you in softer words what Laura ler said so that I also don't get cancelled all right so Laura lumer said that the the level of the uh criminal Behavior Uh consistent with the the laws on the books for treason uh might go to the level of the death penalty now here's the problem if you were to say hey people might be guilty of certain crimes here's why we think they are uh the penalty for that could be the death penalty it should be on the table that's okay because you're just talking about the law here's what I think is too far and let's see if you would have spotted it because Tim P did so he's good at this right um if you say let's get a list of names of people and then before you've tried them you say we want to kill these people then you sort of become Alvin Bragg yourself you hear what I'm saying you don't want to start with the person and then talk about the death penalty unless you've really had a lot of conversations and in a court case that's you know credible about those charges but it's real dangerous to go full fonny Willis and or who was it Leticia James and say you're you know you're running for office to get Trump that's too far somehow she's not paying for that but it's way too far so Tim P I think very smartly and very um decisively said oh shoot she just gave You.
Tube a predicate to cancel my whole Channel and I'm not going to die on this hill it wasn't even my opinion this was a guest's opinion so nice move nice move Tim P because the information still gets out you know the social media picks it up but he reduces his risk on You.
Tube and he lives to fight again totally respect for that nicely played good good uh decision-making um and uh I don't think you could have played that better and you know I don't mind that Laura lommer has her opinion so it's not about her opinion I think that part was fine it's just you don't want to give You.
Tube you know this fresh bash of of red meat to cancel you because you know they want to you know they want to cancel Tim pool so well played um Jonathan Turley still you know National Treasure talking about any of the legal elements of politics so he talks about the fact that uh you know the the whole situation where the government or the Republicans we trying to get a hold of the audio that they only have the transcript of of Biden doing his testimony to her it's you are and of course the Democrats say Hey you have the transcript that's good enough and then the Republicans say yeah but we don't trust the transcript we think you might have edited it and it might be way worse than the transcript shows and we have a right to know because if Biden is not capable um it's got to be 25th amendment situation so they definitely have a right to know I I completely support their attempt to get that but listen to according to turle uh the justice department is making a new claim for why they can't release the audio of something they've already released the transcript to can you think of any reason why you wouldn't release the audio when they've willing and already and publicly and everybody's seeing it the transcript what reason could there be other than it sounds really terrible like really bad it must be awful just guessing but listen to one of the arguments that they just profer uh they say uh that the audio tape must be withheld this is from Jonathan Turley uh due to the risk that it could be altered by artificial intelligence and passed off as an authentic in a deep fake release quote the passage of time and advancements in audio artificial intelligence and deep fake Technologies only amplify concerns about malicious manipulation of audio files wouldn't that apply to everything that anybody has on audio I I feel like that is such a a stretch such a stretch that it's almost just laughable but I'm going to surprise you it's not a terrible argument like it it strikes you as immediately absurd I me that's how it struck me but let me let me support it as best I can it's somewhat rare that you would have a situation where there's an audio only because that's easier to De fake if if it had been something he' said in public it'd be easy to debunk it because you'd say okay here's the real one he said this in public now you can see how the Deep fake changed it but since the only public thing we'd have is an audio that nobody listens to if somebody were to take a clip out of it and you know do a the 10-second clip where it sounds like he said the NW or something ridiculous then I think people would believe it I do cuz if the headline story said the audio tape is out and then you saw a clip and then you played it and you heard what you thought was Biden's voice and he sounded really dementia ridden and crazy and you know saying racist stuff and whatever you might believe it and we're close enough to the election where a fake audio tape could actually change things remember the audio tape of trump saying grab them by the people thought that was going to change the election it turns out it didn't but is it a realistic risk that when you're this close to an election and it's the president who's running for reelection and it's Audio Only it is actually an unusually big risk wouldn't you agree because I think somebody would alter it immediately that it's not even a risk it would happen it it would happen I I think you could say with complete confidence that there would be at least a parody version which people would think was real at the very least it would be a parody version where he where he's just saying crazy stuff so I don't think this should be upheld because if you generalize this it would be devastating to the normal operation of the world but it's not crazy it's not crazy that it opens the door to a a bad thing happening but let me let me suggest this and I think the people asking for it will say the same thing we already have the transcript and we already have a zillion hours of Biden talking on audio and other places AI doesn't need the specific audio from the event all you have to do is run the transcript through it on a voice that's trained as Biden and then if that works you go back in and you edit the transcript and feed back into AI again so instead of saying the real transcript in Biden's voice it adds H and you know nword or some crazy thing so I feel as if maybe the lawyers make making this ask don't understand how AI Works did they not understand that whether we have the transcript or not or whether we have the audio or not it actually doesn't have any effect on whether somebody would make a deep fake yeah the the the def fect that they're worried about could be made tomorrow based on what's already publicly available with no research whatsoever you know just Google transcript and yeah actually you don't even have to have the transcript because if you're going to do a fake one you can make up the transcript nobody's going to check see the the trouble with Fakes is that they do their damage before they're debunked and the debunk never gets the attention of the original so there's nothing that you couldn't do right now to fake that um okay so Trump went to the UFC yesterday got a standing ovation it was crazy do you know what that standing ovation at the UFC sounded like to me well if he just heard it on the surface it sounded like Yay Trump yay but here's what I heard we'll take the outlaw did you see the crowd almost all men well I mean dominant male audience the men there were very clearly by their reaction saying Outlaw you just made him better there's almost nothing you could have done to Trump that would have been as good for his brand than becoming an outlaw to the to the Crooked government honestly I love it my honest opinion without the spin you know it's the spin season so even I as much as I try to avoid spinning you know everybody's going to do it this this season but honestly you like in my body and my real mind no spin I just love that he's an outlaw because the way he got there you know if he'd robbed the bank I'd say no but the way he got there oh yeah yeah I want the outlaw absolutely positively no qualms about it give me the outlaw and that's what the UFC audience basically said in their own way but it gets better after UFC fighter Kevin Holland won he uh jumped over the ring and went right to president Trump former president Trump and shook his hands and said some private words to him in support obviously Trump you know slapped him on the shoulders and obviously they're now friends uh you should know that UFC fighter Kevin Holland is black does it matter yes yep because it's public and people are very affected by social uh forces so if you see a a uh black Superstar um going right to president Trump and congratulating him that's powerful yeah a lot of Clips on it likewise uh UFC fighter Sean Strickland um said on the microphone to the crowd president Trump you're the man it is a damn travesty what they're doing to you I'll be donating to you I'll be donating to you is the key phrase um by the way I don't know if you have the current data but in the 48 hours after the uh felony conviction verdict um Trump had already earned $1.6 million per felony per felony yeah and if you do the math you know people say he's not really a good business person but by my calculations he invested $130,000 and he got a return of 53 million that's some good investing you know he doesn't get credit for that so yeah it's a 1.6 million per felony uh his his per indictment numbers are not as good but but I think they'll be improving as well so um I think we should be measuring Trump's uh his uh donation Gathering by felonies so if he could get I feel like he's only maybe 12 to 17 felonies away from having all the money he needs for the rest of the campaign so I think we're like three or four felonies away from being really rich with cash so there's that um Trump also at the UFC announced that he's uh getting on Tik Tock now you might know that I think that Tik Tock needs to be cancelled or D divested into the US um but as long as it's there I I guess I gotta agree with vake and with Trump if it's there and it matters and it's a big way to reach voters sure why not all right David saaks and others are pointing out the lawfare double standard here that H Hillary Clinton did similar things without penalty so here's how David saaks explains it uh he calls it the business records double standard in 2016 Hillary Clinton's campaign was fined $8,000 that was it a fine of $8,000 for the following for violating Federal campaign Finance laws huh why her team falsely reported the funding of the steel dossier as legal services and legal and compliance Consulting well what does that sound like huh this sounds exactly like what Trump did exactly what else do we know um according to Sachs actually this opposition research was an attempt to smear her opponent with false and cacious salacious allegations obviously it was also intended to influence the election huh so she recorded it as a lawyer expense but really no matter what she was thinking because as Megan Kelly explained on her uh video the other day that it doesn't matter what anybody was thinking when they did the expense it only matters that a reasonable person could look at and say well there's more than one reason you would do that so when when Trump did his uh his uh payments um it didn't matter that he was thinking it was mostly about the election this is Megan Kelly's take uh it had more to do with the fact that a reasonable person would say well there's more than one reason you would want that information not to get out you know one's your family one's your business reputation and the other is political so if everybody agrees that there were three reasons that should have been reason enough that he can't be convicted you need one reason if there's three it's just sort of automatically you're not you're not guilty so uh Hillary obviously was putting this into legal expenses to hide her uh to hide her contribution to the hoax of course moreover says sax Hillary's campaign was headquartered in New York state huh and of Brooklyn New York which would make it fall under the jurisdiction of New York penal law 1751 the state law which makes it a felony to falsify business records with the intent to conceal the commission of a crime huh I feel like that steel dossier thing was a crime wasn't it it should have been I don't know maybe it wasn't technically but should have been um and then the saxs asks what the key distinction between Hillary's campaign violation versus recent news um and he concludes with Hillary's violation there wasn't a Manhattan prosecutor politically motivated to bring an unprecedented case to trial now as you know people who in the past may have um leaned left in their politics like Elon Musk and I'm not sure where David sa saxs was but he's you know clearly in the uh anti-biden train at the moment so you see some people that you wouldn't expect to be anti-biden who are clearly anti-biden but uh let's look at the rest of them because it's a growing thing and I think the Dam's about to burst ABC news says this in a post like any other American found guilty of a crime Donald Trump is likely to face uh new restrictions and lose a number of Rights new due to his Newfound felon status what about this choice of words found guilty of a crime isn't that an interesting phrase he was found guilty why wouldn't you just say guilty why wouldn't you just say now that he's a felon or now that the jury has concluded he's a felon why would you say that he was found guilty instead of guilty well let me put the hypnotist filter on it as as a hypnotist um I was trained that people's choice of words reveals their thoughts uh and all the time it's really reliable the choice of the words found guilty instead of just guilty now I do understand that found guilty is a common phrase and it wouldn't be surprising to see it used in other context but where you have a choice and they obviously had a choice of any words that wouldn't tell the story why would you put found guilty because found guilty has the odor of we know he's not really guilty but it is true that he was found guilty it it suggests that the ABC News person who wrote that post doesn't believe that he was guilty because they're watching the same thing we watched and it was lawfare so look for that look for words that you say to yourself they had a choice of words and within all the words they could have chose chosen they picked the one that sends a flag it's sort of a quite a signal but is there more well as you know Eli hon who one of the main legal Minds on CNN um said the trial blew his mind and it's an unjustified mess and basically he uh Eli honig dumped on the lawfare of it exactly as Republicans do in other words in a purely factual way he just said it's law fair garbage and it wouldn't have happened to anybody else now that's a big deal because he says that on CNN he said his times on CNN and they're not taking him off the air so CNN I'm going to give them credit again um they do seem to be pivoting towards something like a reasonable middle we don't want to get ahead of ourselves and say that you know it's going to be a completely clean situation but I see the effort I mean to me it looks like they're trying because remember also fared Zakaria said directly that unless your name was Donald Trump you never would have been charged with this crime now that is really clear there's no vagueness in that fed is saying all right if you look at the situation this is dirty I mean that's just that's as clear as you can be but it gets better uh you know how many times I've told you that sanes is the least biased person on CNN well true to his brand he had Charlamagne the God on you know charlamagne's doing a book tour and uh but Charlamagne is also famous for not being pro Biden at the moment you know he's not a lover of trump but he's very clearly saying you know Biden's a mess so SM smes has him on there and uh asked if the verdict would change the outcome of the election and here's what Charline said he said so it's really which candidate can energize their base and situations like this it does energize Trump's base I see Biden's base upset with him over a number of things I do think a situation like this gives them something to fight for meaning the the trumpers um now I saw somebody say that they thought that smes' face and body language suggested that he was going to explode like he didn't like seeing it I would suggest that you're reading him completely wrong smires knew exactly what Charlemagne was going to say I mean not exactly but he he knew what Charlemagne's message was he invited him on the show no he wasn't surprised he wanted his audience to hear Charlemagne's point of view just think about that he intentionally invited somebody he knew was going to trash Biden somebody who's black and is influential smir did that here's what I saw when I looked at Smur knish's face and this is just subjective right but remember I I have the perspective that I'm already biased that he's unbiased the look that I saw on his face was just sort of like shock and amazement like the rest of us so I think he was just trying to keep a poker face but I think he was having a reaction to it but not the reaction that you know he hated hearing it I think it was a reaction of the moment we're in is a big moment so what happens when all of those people associated with CNN turn completely on the story and agree with the Republicans well they're not the only ones Ellen dtz a famous Democrat says Trump was unjustly convicted this worst case in 60 years should never been brought and the public should see the judge's outrageous behavior now that's pretty clear dtz is not saying I don't know you could see this both ways nope one of the most experienced and capable legal Minds in the country a Democrat said no this is totally crooked totally crooked obviously crooked every part of this is crooked now I've taught you before that if one of the major networks let's say CNN or MSNBC say something is a fact but then you go to the conservative Outlets let's say breitbard or Fox News and they say it's not a fact or vice versa one of them says it's true and the other one says not it's usually not usually not so or or let me put it a better way you can't tell if it's true it's just two versions now if you could you know there's some objective facts that they show you that you can make up your own mind that's different but you don't really know if something's true if they disagree in their normal way they disagree but it's unusual that CNN and Fox News for example would be on the same page about anything and they're on the same page that this was lawfare and it was completely rigged system which is phenomenal but here's the best part um some of you know uh the name Naval ravikant founder of angelist and one of the most uh prominent investor and thinkers in Silicon Valley what you might not know about him is that he's famously non-political famously does a lot of tweeting um you know he's one of the most quoted people in uh in well most quoted people in philosophy and Technology at the moment success lot of lot of different domains so he's generally considered I've actually call them the smartest person I've ever met so let me say that again the smartest person I've ever met do you know how many smart people I've met quite a few right so and I'll stay with that you might be the smartest person I've ever met now here I'm I'm calling smart not just depth but breadth he he can he can tell you the better take on more to topics than any human being I've ever met and it'll be a different take and it'll be better than one you had on so many different topics it's crazy all right so when he talks there are enough people certainly in the investment world in the in the technical World he's well known so when he says anything that kind of Strays from his non-political stance your ears just go wait what did I just hear and here's what he said he put two of Biden's uh posts on next next to each other and one of them was about Biden bragging that he ignored the Supreme Court to get um student loans cancelled and then the next one was where he was saying that nobody's Above the Law after the one where he said he got around the law so naal quotes a famous quote from I think some South American dictator type and he and he said just this and nothing else quote for my friends everything for my enemies the law now the way that quote is taken is that when he says for my enemies the law he doesn't mean just if they broke the law that's the important part he means you can use the law to get rid of enemies and that's just the tool you use and uh that is what we are observing so now CNN has made it safe for the least political person in all of public life to tell you that the former president of the United States is getting lawed right in front of you now to you this might seem like a small deal but I don't think you quite understand how much um how much persuasive influence Nal has on the smartest people in Silicon Valley he he is so respected that when he puts down a stake and I would say that he put down a stake that this is too far to get him to talk about anything in the political domain and to make a direct statement about it this is pretty direct is extraordinary I think the dam is about to break I think CNN's already broken I think the the investors in Silicon Valley they're all going to turn the Allin podcast is Allin Elon Musk he's Allin nval he just broke a long tradition and and that I I'm I'm sure he thought about it for a long time before he did it something's happening that's bigger than anything you could imagine it it's not obvious yet but wow you can feel it that there the the feeling that things have gone too far is so strong right now yeah the energy is very different and here's the part that uh I was saving for you do you know what judge M's first name is how many of you know his first name just off the top of your head have you ever heard it his first name is Juan yeah Juan Muran that's the judge that's going to jail Trump probably do you know where he was born Colombia country of Colombia yeah judge judge michan was born in Columbia he's an immigrant the judge that's judging Trump is an immigrant from below the Border does that sound like the right choice the most famous build the wall keep the South Americans where they are of all time and his judge is one of the people that would have you know presumably the biggest problem with that kind of attitude gets better uh his father was a military officer in Colombia military officer for a while and then he later served in Colombia's intelligence Services huh colia what do we know about Colombia what do we know about their military what do we know about the Colombian intelligence Services let's see some people would say that Colombia and the government and the military are tightly connected with the cartels some would say and some would say that the cartels are tightly linked with the American CIA some would say so let me ask you this if you were the CIA and you knew that Trump didn't even use your services for intelligence and you knew that he was talking about and other Republicans like Tucker were talking about eliminating the CIA and all of your jobs and you wanted to stop him who would be the best pick to do that well I would go with Juan meran father military officer from Colombia who once worked in their intelligence Services somehow made it to the United States as an immigrant and build quite a good life that's who I'd pick so now I'm not going to make an allegation because I don't know anything about his father but why does it look exactly like you would think it would look if the worst case scenario were true and that the whole thing is the CIA and S fixed why why does it look exactly like that is that a coincidence can can we write that off to coincidence that it looks exactly like a CIA operation now again I'm only making unfair inferences about people who are known to be the types of people who associate with other types of people so that's a big you know I don't I don't want to go further than that because that would be defamation so I'm not going to make a claim that I know it's true I'm just asking just asking don't you hate that I'm curious why there's such a big coincidence involved especially when we know that his selection was supposed to be random but clearly wasn't because he got three Trump cases in a row all three so is it exactly what it looks like and in the meantime we hear the people who are uh part of the deep State saying that he's Merchant is going to recommend jail time despite the fact that nobody would get jail time for this if they were not Trump and the argument was because Trump was sort of uh had a bad attitude and violated the gag order so therefore they would send him to jail the that's the argument and and that and on CNN one of the legal guys was testing that argument out that's the most absurd thing I've ever heard at the same time there's a movement to change the law so he can't get secret service protection while he's in jail so he can be killed now uh I was talking with one of my online buddies just before I went live and you know I mentioned that it it looked like on the surface it looks like they're trying to kill him and he didn't understand that I meant that literally he thought I meant figuratively no literally now I'm not going to say I know that that's the case I'm going to say if I were going to put odds on it I'd say it's a 50% chance that there's an active plan by our government to kill Trump I think it's at least a 50% chance and the reason I say that is that we live through Epstein if there had never been an Ste if there had never been a Kennedy who got assassinated if we didn't see that RFK Jr also doesn't get secret service protection for no good reason I would have said okay our government doesn't do things like that but clearly they do things like that so yes they they have an existential risk well to their jobs uh if Trump becomes the president again and what would they do if they are the dirty tricks group of the country the people who are selected by their willingness to break rules the CIA is selected by their willingness to do illegal things at least the operators are because they're doing illegal things in other countries uh uh you could argue that it's still legal in our country if they do illegal things and it's authorized by our country but that's sort of that's sort of cutting it fine I mean they're basically people who signed up for yeah I'll go do super illegal things that'll be my job and that way we would assume that they wouldn't do super illegal things when it's the very group that's been selected because they like to do or at least they're willing to do super illegal things no it's at least a 50% chance that they're trying to kill him Don JR says the same thing it's not crazy it is well within the parameters of what we've seen if I'd never seen the laware happen then I'd say well you know but the courts are fair no they're not to me it looks like the court case is driven by the same people who are apparently if you look at it on the surface on the surface it looks exactly like a murder plot with a statistical element which is maybe they don't know for sure he'll be killed in prison but they think there's a good chance so anyway that's scary um so uh over on MSNBC The the stupid Network representative Bowman's on there he says if you stay home and you do not exercise the power your vote you're giving your power to white supremacist Mega individuals you know where the white supremacist Mega individuals are because I I've never really seen one on the news but I'm I'm going to take a guess I think they're up in the mountains with the white supremacist militia that's forming they're hiding away with the black guy who can't figure out how to get an Ida to vote and well you get it you get the idea um V had an interesting legal take I don't know if I'm buying it yet but it's interesting um he says that Trump can be pardoned by a president uh for his New York conviction even though it's a state matter normally uh a president can only uh what would be uh pardon or commute for something that was a federal offense you can't do it for a state charge and and Trump was charged and convicted by the state however the state's charges depended entirely upon the fact that there were also Federal violations per their case so if you were to uh pardon Trump from the federal part of it it would make the state part of it dissolve because the state part of it depended on the federal part so even though the federal part was not really what the state found they still relied on the jury thinking a federal thing had been violated so that they could apply the state thing to the higher level crime of felony because it supported the other charge or vice versa one supported the other I forget which way it went but I don't know if I buy that I I it sounds right but I feel like there might be an alternative legal theory about whether that's practical I like the thinking and once again if it's true if it's true how did we get this far and why did V have to be the one to bring it up because he went to a little bit of law school so so he's the only one have figured it out man do we need him in the in the government we need him so much right even if he's wrong on this at least he came up with this and that's pretty good anyway so the um yeah I do think V is the primary thing that could keep Trump alive if if they wanted to be vice president and got nominated for that so because he's the one that I think the CIA would be most afraid of who not named Trump so I think he's the way to keep Trump alive um it would be wild if Trump nominated V for vice president and said directly you know what some other people were my top choice but the V will keep me alive can you imagine that cuz it was real it's real but he could say that directly you know if a didn't want the job he wanted to have a different role uh I had somebody else in mind but honestly he's the one who's going to keep me alive I'd love to hear him say that directly all right getting back into the Soros mystery uh I asked why is it that Soros is doing what he's doing and I wanted other people to explain it to me like I'm an idiot so I could understand why Soros would be funding so many things that seem like disastrous for the country that he lives in right why would you destroy the country that you live in now I I'm being called naive and uninformed and here's what I heard uh from a user online that Soros supports anarco tyranny all the things we're seeing in the country because he believes now this is the mind reading part because he believes in a globalist agenda that transcends National borders uh and it wouldn't matter that he's a citizen of the United States because soros's preference would be that states go away and he'll he'll do fine because he's Rich that ain't it that ain't it I I feel like this is an analysis that comes from people who have never been Rich may I give you my rich guy analysis it's the only one you should listen to Because Soros is Rich if you're not hearing the opinion from somebody also rich I mean I don't have anything like his money but I've experienced going from poor to to being wealthy it changes you and here's the thing you want the least if you're if you're on top so right now he's sitting at like the Pinnacle of human beings you don't want that to change if you're at the top the last thing you want in a risk reward world the last thing you want is to change the whole system that you're dominating at at the top that introduces a risk of total collapse that would take him from the top to not the top it could make every dollar he owns worth nothing right so being in the top 1% let me tell you for sure because I'm in it I don't want the whole system to change dramatically in any way now do I think that the whole system should be changed dramatically yeah I can think of lots of ways but I would want to do them care and without changing the general structure of what got me to where I am the last thing I want is to have the country thrown into chaos and then I have to figure out how to you know create a good situation from scratch I'm already in a good situation if you've never experienced going from uncertainty and economic you know low income to a place where you would call yourself wealthy when you get there the last thing you want to do is change the whole world into something you don't even know what will happen nobody does that and among the group of the nobodies who would do that the top top top the very number one person who wouldn't do that is a person who's famous for being good at risk analysis that's what Soros is famous for he's apparently unusually good at risk analysis nobody with risk analysis ability destroys the whole system without a replacement you know that's right online Nobody Does that so the idea that he's in in favor of you know destroying all the borders and forming a global network is crazy now here's the other thing if a globalist One World Government were to be formed have you thought through who would be in charge that have you lived in the real world at all if you form a real world government of the you know top richest person people like actually an official government they would just fight with each other it would be like the Democrats and the Republicans they they would be buying the fight of all fights when none of them need a fight all the billionaires are already the champions of the world they can do whatever they want they can affect governments easily why would they change their situation dramatically and if they did why do you think Soros would be the you know like top billionaire don't you think he would get demoted as likely as promoted it would be the craziest riskiest chaotic thing to ever do if you are already at the top the next thing is that people say he's doing it for money Scott you don't understand you know he destroys countries and then he bets against their currencies and then he makes a whole bunch of money money now I need a fact check on this but am I crazy or is Soros trying to give away his money my understanding is he's trying to donate most of it in the context of trying to give away most of your money you're not doing gigantic terrible illegal things to make more money like it doesn't even make sense like how does that any of that make sense so whatever is going on here I have no idea I have no idea I just know that the simplistic explanations of a globalist One World Government don't track at all with who Soros is and I and I'm not reading his mind I'm saying that nobody in that situation would want that choice nor have you ever heard anybody show me show me a um show me a billionaire who really wants uh governments to go away and have one world government I I don't think there are any and definitely not him because he's good at risk management and nobody would nobody would do that it would be crazy anyway so that's still a mystery let's talk about the Israel peace deal uh as I told you on day one it was always fake so there's not there's not really a peace deal that anybody's going to take too seriously but it looks like Israel's going to buy some time I don't know how long it will take to get whatever they need done in Rafa but it's probably a few months you don't think that they can stall negotiations for two months of course they can of course they can yeah the world economic forum is even the more ridiculous Theory yeah I think Elon Musk is right about them being a club for rich people uh if if Elon Musk isn't worried and he's about as close to the inside of the the world as anybody could be and he seems totally uncon you know unconvinced there's any danger there and I agree with him completely I think it's just a club for rich people meanwhile in Ukraine Russia's trying to uh they say bomb Kira what is the second biggest city it's not Kev it's uh kir kirov or something I forget anyway it looks like the Russians are trying to take out their vital services and depopulate it before they do anything bigger so it looks like the current method of taking over a city in a military way is the American and Israeli version as a little more boots on the ground the Russian version is H we'll go in when there's nothing left car carco kov thank you the city is kov kov kov or kov one of those anyway not much happening there besides the usual Badness that by the way concludes my comments for today sorry I ran long again I'm going to say bye to uh You.
Tube and Rumble and X I'm going to talk to the good folks on locals privately the subscri and uh I'll see the rest of you tomorrow hope you enjoyed the show bye for now locals hold on coming to you e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e but
[Music]
[Music]
B
[Music]
[Music]
d
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human
civilization it's called coffee with
Scott Adams and you've never had a
better day and let me tell you the Omens
are all lining up for an amazing amazing
day probably the best you've ever
seen now let's see there I
am no
huh I still don't see the feed all right
it would be live that's where it would
be there I
am we're
live well if you'd like to take your
experience up to levels that nobody can
understand with their tiny human smooth
brains all you need for that is a cup or
marker glass or tanker Chell Stein the
Cen suar flas us a but kind fill it with
your favorite liquid I like coffee and
join me now for the unparallel pleasure
of the immediately of the day thing that
makes everything better it's called the
simultaneous Sip and it's going to
happen
now ah powering up you know what I feel
like I feel so
good I feel like an
outlaw yeah that's how good I
feel how am I feeling
felonius yeah
felonius it's a great
feeling all right let's talk about the
news today's Dilbert reborn shows you in
the first panel I posted it on X um you
can see that I designed it with AI so
the first panel of the dilber comic I
used AI to tell me some interesting
camera angles or perspectives
uh for a guy on his computer when a dog
walks into the room now ai can't produce
my characters because it'll complain
about copyright and stuff but it can
give me a generic guy and a generic dog
and then when I have the angle of all
the furniture I just replace them with
my
characters so you can you can see how
that worked out you gave a a new angle
that i' had never used
before so that's my first I think my
first re life world repeatable I'll
definitely use it again AI assist to
writing my daily comic so it's sort of a
a
milestone well apparently there's a
Tesla deal being worked out to give Elon
Musk his money that they gave him and
then took away from him the courts took
away and uh the only portion that he
would be able to use for 5 years is to
pay the taxes that he would owe if he
were to get it right away so so
apparently you can't just take the money
and run some people were worried about
that uh he'd have to stay there for five
years to get his money so should make
the stockholders a little bit happy if
he has to stay there and work for
another five
years so we'll see we hope he gets his
money um there's a gigantic Wall Street
Journal says there a huge cost saving
technology for making solar panels now
you've heard this story a billion times
but this one sounds pretty promising I
didn't realize that China can make solar
panels at roughly half the price of an
American
manufacturer uh but with this new
technology it should close that Gap a
lot and apparently it's not just
theoretical it looks like it's you know
ready to put into the system yeah I
won't get into the technical details but
it's a you know it reduces the amount of
silver they need makes something thinner
than before and um would reduce the cost
substantially and I ask you again which
one of the climate models takes into
account um technical innovations that
totally change the curve none because
you can't put in a climate model the
thing that hasn't been invented yet and
yet we know there'll be tons of things
invented between now and you know when
they imagine the Bur the Earth is going
to burn up so if you don't put human
invention in your 100-year
model is that
credible think about how different the
world is in any 20year period you know
it's the difference between Ai and no AI
computers and no computers smartphones
and no
smartphones 20 years is a long time so
these climate models are absurd in
leaving out probably the biggest
variable
I mean you think if you're looking at
climate change the biggest variable is
the CO2 or the Sun or the
ocean but probably the biggest variable
is human Innovation it's not even in the
model right tell me if I'm wrong but I'm
pretty sure that the models assume that
we don't innovate for the rest of
humankind we just sort of
die all right uh so that's happening
uh here's the scariest coolest thing
there's a Swiss startup that has made a
computer and of brain
organoids now I don't know what an
organoid is but I'm going to guess it's
something like an artificial brain that
they built in a Petri dish or a tube or
something so I don't think it came from
a human I
hope you know maybe the cells did or
something uh but they now have in the
real world apparently you can connect to
this thing if you're if you're paying
them uh and it consumes a million times
less power than regular digital
processors and it's
fast let me say that
again there will be a data center a data
center this is already Real by the way
this is not speculative this is
today
functioning there's uh human brain parts
that they've somehow connected to a
digital interface and they use the human
brain part to do the calculating at 1
million times less power than regular
stuff do you think there's any way that
if it works and it can be reproduced
that it does work as so it's already up
and running so if it could be
reproduced as scale who in the world is
going to pay for regular computing when
you can have a computer to get a million
times less
power we are
building a human brain SL
cyborg the Borg I don't
know it it's super cool but also super
whoo because you don't know what could
go wrong wait a minute how many ways
could it go wrong if we start building
human brain organoid computers I don't
know I I guess a raises questions I'm
not afraid of it per se but raises a lot
of questions well NASA had to once again
delay it's uh an astronaut crude flight
of what would be the Boeing starliners I
think First Flight with
astronauts and I didn't see the reason
that the flight was scrubbed but I have
a
theory it's a bowing
Starliner and I think the problem is you
know how jur
sometimes are
sequestered yeah if the jury is going to
go home sometimes the judge will say oh
you can't go home you have to stay you
know away from any influence because you
don't want them reading the news they
might act differently the jurors if they
read the news you want them to stick to
just the trial
data and I'm starting to think that the
uh the astronauts for the boing
Starliner maybe they should have been
sequestered for the last month to maybe
not see any news about Boeing's quality
control
lately um so I worry that the reason
it's delayed is that the astronauts were
watching the news and said um I think
I've got a cold or something I I'm not
sure I can go oh oh my arm so
something's going wrong here I I'll
never be able to control it maybe you
better use the backup I don't know I'm
just
joking all right did you know that
China's labor costs are about double
that of Philippines Malaysia India
Thailand and
Vietnam I'll tell you you think that the
United States has trouble you think we
have problems we
do but how would you like to be China
and your entire situation depends on
manufacturing because it's the backbone
of the economy and your twice as
expensive as the
Alternatives and everybody has a
gigantic incentive to get their business
out of
there what are they going to
do now besides the fact that you know
these countries have half the cost and
they presumably they're building up some
infrastructure so they can be serious
competitors to China but I also haven't
heard about
Mexico I don't know what the cost of
Labor is in Mexico compared to China and
I also don't know what's going to happen
with
robots because if we're making these
much um much cheaper solar panels and
then we get rid of the labor by putting
robots in the factories so so you use a
manufacturing process that drops the
price by I don't know half and then you
put in robots that take another 25% off
the price or something like that
um I tell you that if there's a way to
invest in
solar um I'm not recommending you invest
in it because I don't make I don't make
recommendations for Investments but it
does seem like maybe there's something
that's going to happen here that could
be gigantic you don't really think of
robots influencing energy except to use
it you know they use a lot of energy but
they're going to be building the solar
panels and the solar plants and the
solar everything and probably the uh
nuclear power plants too soon all right
so there's a story that we don't know
what the real story is but Alex Jones is
going through something that looks bad
now he's saying that the feds came to
his door and they were trying to lock
him out and take all of his stuff and
close him down but he was also acting
let's say I'm could to say
emotional if if it were somebody I
didn't like I would use other words
but since I I like him you know he was
nice to me he's had me on the show and
when somebody's nice to me in person I
can't really just go in public and then
trash him like it just I'm just not
built that way so because I've met him
in person and he was very generous to me
um I'll I'll say that he's having an
emotional reaction that we don't quite
understand some people say it's mental
health some people say it's substance
some people say it's both some people
say get an up some people say um and I
think his staff has backed him up by the
way his staff is on the same P page so
it's not just him what whatever is going
on his staff seems to have witnessed as
well so I don't know who these feds were
or what exactly they were trying to do
except that it's in the context of
everybody who is pro Trump getting a hit
so I don't know what's going on but keep
an eye on it um he may need some help in
any variety of ways we we don't know
what the problem is but he's clearly in
a crisis
situation and so if you you know have
any interest
in in either his operation or him as a
human being um have a little bit of
empathy and uh keep an eye on that maybe
there's way you can help one way or
another all
right uh Mexico here here's a story that
snuck up on
me uh imagine finding this out today
this is kind of
mindblowing the next president of Mexico
is likely to do to be a Jewish
woman is this the first time you hearing
that I I heard it today so apparently
they're having an
election the sitting president can't run
again they have one-term presidents six
years and the the mentor some somebody
who's worked closely with the current
president so he's recommending her and
that's the reason she's getting her her
push Claudia shine bomb a Jewish woman
with a PhD in Energy
Engineering that that's about as perfect
as you can get isn't
that how would you like to be the
president of Mexico you're coming in
with a PhD in Energy
Engineering but it gets better she's
bilingual she used to live in the Bay
area she used to live in the Bay Area
she's
bilingual the current president of
Mexico is not bilingual do you think
that makes a
difference hell
yes hell yes language is the big
uniter right if you can talk to somebody
in the same language it's a whole
different experience right you that's
how you Bond you don't really bond with
Putin if he can't speak your language
or she uh but wouldn't it be nice to
have somebody we could work with in the
same language who's PhD in Energy
Engineering now we we all assume that
the cartels have undue influence on the
governments so there's that but are you
also surprised that Mexico would be even
considering apparently she's way ahead
in the polls it looks like it's a lock
um very popular
did you see a female president of Mexico
coming anytime
soon it's it's kind of interesting and
impressive and this is the Dei you
want you know what I mean th this is
diversity done
correctly as far as I can tell the only
reason she's being considered is that
she's overwhelmingly
qualified so how about that
H how about just being overwhelmingly
qualified and then getting the top job
okay I'm good with that so at least on
paper she looks like exactly the person
that America would want that job as well
as the Mexicans so maybe something Goods
coming out that and there there is talk
that Mexico's um going to have an
economic boom like you've never seen
before because remember the
manufacturing is moving toward it that's
a good sign and they've got some major
infrastructure things like maybe a
railroad and some other stuff that will
connect the resorts and turn it into
more of a a well-engineered
destination so all that's happening if
the cartels don't derail things um
there's something good that could happen
now I've said this before but here's
what I think is the only hope for living
with Mexico
I'm seeing somebody mocking me for quote
believing in
solar let's pretend that you know what
you're talking about now did you think I
was unaware that there's a waste problem
of course there is of course there is am
I unaware that people are not good at
calculating you know the relative cost
and benefits in the future of different
technological options
I used to do that work I know it can't
be done it used to be my job to
calculate expenses in the future you
can't really do that it was my job but I
couldn't do it and nobody can do it so
do I think that do I know what the
economics of solar power will be next
year no I don't you know what but do you
know what I do
know that the person who is mocking me
you don't
know no you're an idiot who thinks you
know the expenses of Technologies you've
never been involved with because you
read a article
somewhere right I'm smart enough to know
that I don't know what will be the
competing cost structures 20 years from
now which is what you have to think
about right it's not what it is today
it's if you start a project what does
your nuclear power plant cost in 10
years when you're done with it you know
what is your solar plant and your
gigafactory or your your Giga storage
thing what is it cost in 10 or 20 years
nobody knows
that if if you think you know it dear
troll commenter well you're the smartest
person in the world according to you
because you know what can't be no known
good for you did you know about this
story about the technology that would
lower the cost of solar did you read
that this morning before I
did all right enough about you
uh Tucker Carlson's uh being uh really
outspoken uh on his video recently said
uh nothing is ever about our safety and
that all the big political stuff is you
know clearly about the interests of the
people in power he said this country in
the world only changes when we eliminate
the
CIA it'll take someone willing to be
assassinated he gives examples he said
you open the southern border to anyone
who wants to come in you're not checking
IDs you're not doing any kind of
Biometrics you're not even screening for
Co so clearly you don't care about my
safety check check check correct yes
there is no evidence that the people in
power of our country are interested in
the wellbeing of the citizens there is
plenty of evidence the open border that
they're operating against against our
interests in reason for reasons we don't
quite
understand I don't understand it we'll
talk about more of that later but uh
he's saying directly that the CIA has to
be cancelled completely I saw ex CIA uh
operative agent whatever you want to
call them uh also on Tucker show saying
that when Trump was the president he
didn't use the CIA as much as he used
private intelligence people to tell them
what was going on why would he do that
why would you pay somebody to do the job
of the CIA when the CIA is already being
paid and therefore it's
free you know on a incremental basis why
would you do that I can only think of
one reason that the president of the
United States did not think that the CIA
was on the same side as he was in other
words Trump the person who knew the most
about the CIA while in office had the
most access didn't believe that he could
trust them with the security of the
United
States you have to eliminate them under
that
situation if a sitting president doesn't
think they're even on the same
side not even on the same
side you that's you can't live with that
so if you can buy these services on the
open market and you don't trust the ones
in the
government there is an argument for
eliminating the CIA and it's strong you
know you'd have to hear the other side
and I'm not sure they can tell the other
side because it'd be full of secrets but
is there a surfacy argument that says
getting rid of the CIA the most that's a
pretty radical thing to do is there an
argument for it yeah there is you know
there was a time when the CIA was you
know overthrowing governments and doing
all kinds of things to uh help America
control the world and you could have at
that time said I don't like America
doing all these other things in other
countries uh so I don't like the
CIA but there would have been a good
argument to keep them because the let me
let me make the Mak valian power
argument
here wouldn't it be nice if the United
States left all the other countries
alone and left them to pursue their best
interest for their people until they
become thriving democracies and allies
of us in the future once they' have used
their own free will and their own
resources to become an independent
country that could be like a strong Ally
for us no not in the real world in the
real world if we didn't take them over
somebody else would have right China
would have taken them because whoever
has money can control any small entity
whether it's a
country uh a
politician uh or another country yeah
any other country so it doesn't take
much money to overthrow a country you
just bribe the right people and there
you go yeah you maybe you could bribe 50
people to overthrow any
country and they're probably all
bribable so you know the the levers are
there for over for controlling other
countries but here's my argument the
mellan argument for the
CIA they might be complete bastards who
are doing terrible things to other
countries every day but if they didn't
what would happen somebody else would
and then we would be surrounded by
countries that let's say China had a lot
of control over that's no good
so the thing is that the the worst let's
or best let me say the best criminal
wins we don't live in a world where
there's good versus evil there's just
evil versus evil at the government level
humans tend to be closer to good you
know if you leave them alone they're
more likely to be good to each other
because we're sort of tribal we grew up
that way but countries are evil as soon
as you have a country it's probably
corrupt no matter who it is uh so
maybe the strongest criminal
organization is the one you want to be
with the strongest criminal organization
at the moment America appears to be the
strongest criminal
organization which might be your safest
situation in a historical sense
historically you just wanted to be in
the strongest country and it didn't
matter why they were the strongest right
don't you think you were safer being a
Roman citizen when Rome was at its
peak without supporting that Rome were
good guys they weren't good guys but it
was probably the safest place to live in
those times you know to be a Roman
citizen so we're sort of the Roman
citizens it feels like to me so yes
there's an argument that the CIA works
against our interests but I'd like to
hear the
counterargument I just don't know
anybody can make it because you'd have
to say what I said yeah we're kind of
criminals we do terrible things every
single day
you wouldn't even want to know what
we're doing in your name but it keeps
you safer because we're the best
criminals that might be the argument and
I could be convinced by that I hate it
but it's a world in which sometimes your
best choice is also
terrible don't
know all right well but uh the keep in
mind that Tucker's father was in the CIA
I
believe and and he often thinks
that um I mean he has a good he has a
good window into that world so I take
his opinion
seriously oh
trolls uh being really extra stupid in
public is not hurting
me it's just amusing
me yeah it's just amusing me so thanks
say say some more really dumb things
about the future of technology to
entertain the rest of the commenters
they would like to see your stupidity in
full
flower so say some more irrational
things
please all right let's talk about the
hooc crcy as you know the Biden uh
campaign is built entirely on hoaxes
from the fine people hoax to the Trump
tear Gast peaceful protesters hoax and
lot more drinking bleach it's one hoax
after
another and the Biden Harris
headquarters uh X um the X account um
said four years ago today Trump tiar
guest peaceful protesters outside the
White House well it took about a minute
before Joel Pollock fact checked them
hard and nope that was all debunked by
sources that Democrats trust as well as
as Republicans
so why is it that the campaign
can be so blatant about something that's
been fact jacked and very clearly didn't
happen I mean absolutely did not happen
and it's well known their their Their
audience is so
underinformative
course they know it's a lie
but they know it works so they're going
to say it anyway I'm not so
sure I'm not so sure I I think that the
Biden Harris campaign is so Dei
crippled that the level of incompetence
there you can't really assume that it's
normal it's probably
extraordinary and if you're new to my
commentary let me quickly add we're not
talking about anybody's genes or culture
that's not in the conversation about Dei
Dei is a system it's not a
person it's not a person it's a system
and the
system moves people around like little
chess players and there aren't enough
chess players for what they need to do
so they meet their diversity targets
whether they have qualified candidates
or not because humans always meet the
targets that they're measured on and
their performances judged upon and that
big thing they're judged on so if you
assume that Dei as a system is
guaranteed to fail because the pipeline
of qualified people would be smaller
than the demand forcing them to take
lesser and lesser qualified people just
to meet their diversity
goals and if you assume that Democrats
don't have an option they have to be
diverse it's their brand so they're
forced to be diverse but they're
demonstrating to the rest of the world
through what I would consider the most
incompetent administration of all time
and the most incompetent campaign and
the most incompetent
spokesperson and all of those things are
permeated with Dei
hires which if they were qualified to do
their jobs you would see a better job
yeah I'm not talking about one thing
that I'm criticizing that did there
there's a pervasive incompetence in the
current government like we've never
really seen before and the campaign is
so obviously incompetent and they're so
obviously backing the wrong guy that um
this is sort of a the Biden campaign is
basically your Canary in the coal mine
for every
corporation right they just got to
diversity faster because they're so
public they really had to companies are
also trying to go as fast as they can
but you can see what happens when you
get to uh
Dei diversity goals when you have a a
limited pipeline of qualified people
again because of systemic racism at the
school level just not producing enough
diverse
candidates
so uh yeah the hoax campaign and the Dei
uh
incompetence uh should bring down the
whole house in a few months
I I'm expecting a complete um demolition
of the Biden
campaign I think we're close to the
point where the whole thing's just going
to come off the rails in a way we've
never seen
before maybe a whistleblower we'll see I
I was watching a body language expert
look at the two faces of Biden because
that's sort of becoming a
thing and the one the one face is his uh
Angry troll face that looks like a cat's
all puckered up you know You'
know look oh his face is all squeezed
like all all of his face meets in his
nose you one little puckered place and
then you see his wide-eyed open vessel
so he's got the demon look where he
looks demon-possessed and then in the
same talk sometimes he'll have the empty
vessel where his wde eyes are wide open
and his mouth is forming that Hillary
Clinton looking at balloons drop
and you say to yourself how in the world
is that the same person and we still
don't
know I love the fact that he's clearly
two different people I mean I think it's
the same organic person but there's
something that causes him to be a
different personality so much so he
doesn't even look the same not even a
little bit I mean you can generally
recognize as Biden but it's you would
think it's is a different person if they
stood next to each other so here are the
possibilities one is
drugs one is mental
illness one is some kind of a deep fake
thing but I don't think
so and one is maybe there's something
about
editing for example you've seen all the
quick edits they've done on his videos
could it be that they have to take so
much time off between edits that he let
takes a nap and just recovers and he
wakes up and his eyes are open and he
he's the morning version could it be
that we're seeing Morning Joe hey
Morning Joe get it could it be that when
we see Morning Joe he's a little bit uh
more
lucid and that when we see uh you know
evening Joe that he's declined into his
dementia yelling puckered face something
like that whatever is going on is really
bad it's not
good whatever it
is all right um I can't wait for the
first interview with the imaginary
Republican who's not going to vote for
Trump because the law fair got
him have any of you met that person yet
I mean I'm I'm being
told often and reliably by all the polls
that people have decided that since
Trump got convicted by a unfair trial
that therefore they're not going to vote
for
him so we're all waiting to see the
person right you know where I think that
person
is I don't know but I think the
imaginary Republican who's not going to
vote for Trump because of lawfare could
be hanging out and partying with the
black American voter who didn't know how
to get an
ID I think they're together cuz we can't
find either one of them and I think
maybe they're helping each other hide so
somewhere maybe in cabins possibly
possibly in the mountains uh where the
mega supremacists are are gathering
their imaginary armies so it could be
that the imaginary Mega supremacist army
armies that are in the hills are
creating a sanctuary for the imaginary
Republicans who say they won't vote for
Trump but maybe also I'd like to say
that they're diverse and that they've
included the black Americans who don't
who who want to vote and know enough
about the world that they think voting
makes sense yet can't figure out how to
get an
ID yeah we know they exist we were told
they exist we've never talked to one
we've never seen one but the Democrats
are quite sure the imaginary Army in the
hill and the imaginary Republicans who
don't like Trump now and the imaginary
guy who can't get an ID they're all
real and what about the uh imaginary
events that they're running
on every part of the Democrat platform
is
imaginary all the hoaxes are
imaginary all the data that they give us
about their current performance
completely
imaginary they say they're controlling
the Border everything's fine that's
imaginary what about a money that
they're spending
is Biden spending real
money not anymore when you have $35
trillion in debt whatever it is that
you're
spending is
imaginary because who whoever lent it to
you they ain't getting it
back so we've got an imaginary
economy imaginary
data we've got real problems that they
imagine or
not they've got an imaginary Trump who's
in in their imagination tried to take
over on January 6 and they imagined that
he would do it again even though he
never did it they think he'll do again
the thing he never did
once so we have imaginary policies
imaginary people imaginary Trump in the
future imaginary
data do Republicans do
that could could you reverse the
argument and say oh Scott I see your
point but look at all the imaginary
things that the uh Republicans
believe now maybe you would go after
religion if you were not religious you'd
say oh they believe in imaginary stuff
but is it imaginary to think that your
9-month-old
fetus is sort of
alive is that
imaginary that doesn't seem imaginary
you could you could differ on you know
what you think about it or what the law
should be but it's not
imaginary right the debt is not
imaginary the lawfare is not imaginary
even CNN's analysts are saying it's
real so the the here's what I think has
happened I think the Democrats uh sort
of tiptoed into the imaginary world and
it
worked because they can control the the
press for at least their base they can
tell them literally anything and once
they realize that you can tell them
anything and the actual reality won't
make any difference because they also
control the fact Checkers they realize
that going fully imaginary is a better
strategy and I agree by the way it's a
better strategy because they don't have
anything of
substance Trump has
substance he can say you see all that
crime uh I'm going to do the normal
things that people normally do to get
less of it is that imaginary I don't
think so seems pretty real he says he's
going to negotiate with Putin and
zalinski to end the war now it might be
hard but is it
imaginary it's not
imaginary and the entire reason we're in
Ukraine do you think the government told
you the real reason that we're in
Ukraine no they gave you an imaginary
reason the imaginary reason is that
Putin's going to roll up Russia or that
Putin's going to roll up Europe if if he
gets Ukraine you know with no regard to
the fact that some of us know the
history of Ukraine and that as Mike Ben
can explain better that the whole thing
looks like an energy play between two
criminal organizations one United States
and the other Russia and uh basically
it's like we're stealing their their
drug stash so we can sell it ourselves
their energy that's a better way to look
at it so I can't think of anything the
Democrats are doing that isn't imaginary
because once you realize that your
imaginary case will always be stronger
than the real world one why would you
ever use the real world it's unnecessary
they've actually found a way to depart
from all
reality without paying for it it's free
because as long as their press keeps
backing them their own people will never
go read
Breitbart you know the Democrats will
never you know go over to Fox News just
to see what the other people say
although surprisingly Fox News does have
a lot of democrat viewers but I feel
like they might be
conservatives all right let's go on to
some more uh this is going to get better
as I go by the way I I've uh organized
my materials so that I'm going to reach
a crescendo so don't leave before the
crescendo that'd be crazy all right uh
so disgraced da Elvin brag I like I like
just using disgraced in front of
everything all right
um so there there seems to be a whole
bunch of trolls on
YouTube uh all the behavior of social
media look suspicious
now you that like I don't believe that
the trolls are organic anymore at least
not during the election season they're
they're really active and they're
yelling well they're yelling imaginary
things so the trolls are literally
saying imaginary things about me to try
to you know embarrass me on my own live
stream let's see who would do that
imaginary things what group of
people really really really love
imaginary
stuff it's probably exactly what you
think it is all right um so here's
something I didn't know about Alvin
Bragg he went to
Harvard are you telling me that all the
times that people have been ripping on
Alvin Bragg nobody thought to mock him
for having a degree from
Harvard come on people improve your game
it's not for it's not for me to help you
avoid these mistakes no it's funny it's
funny you went to Harvard now to be
fair um not
recently so maybe he went to Harvard
back when uh it made a difference what
your credentials
were if he had just graduated from
Harvard I would be saying you know Dei
hire because you know Harvard's become
ridiculous about their standards but
maybe when he was there it was closer to
you know he belonged there so I don't
know I'm not going to say he didn't
belong in Harvard because there was a
time when Harvard was at least a little
bit
credible uh but according to my uh
digital um creature from Amazon whose
name I don't want to say out loud
because I'll trigger it he has a net
worth of $41
million but I didn't see that explained
do you think it's true so first of all I
don't know it's true it's just coming
from you know the digital assistant so
somebody could have put wrong
information on there but is he
independently
wealthy and how so I guess I would ask
for a fact check on that I do not assert
that to be true just to be clear I do
not assert that it's
true but it's on at least one source of
information so I'm curious about
that did you know that Michigan uh they
were looking at a law to make it harder
to cheat but the Democrats had the
advantage and they passed laws to make
it easier to
cheat right it's
2024 and in Michigan the state the
Democrats unanimously passed legislation
that would make it easier to cheat not
harder can you think of a reason why
they do
that do you think they're planning on an
imaginary
election where you imagine that you knew
the results but really you
don't well that's what I'd worry about
uh that was from the Gateway pundit
they're
reporting uh also Gateway P pundit is
saying that there's some poll of Arab
American voters and Biden is way off in
his
popularity um
he had a 60% Arab American vote in 2020
but he's down to about 20% support now I
don't think the Arab
American Community is big enough that
it's going to move the
election but wow I think it's one more
sign of complete
collapse uh I don't think we realize how
close the Democrat Party is to Total
collapse because until it happens it
doesn't look like it's going to happen
you know thing nothing happens until
something happens so I feel like you
know the major tent pole holding up the
Democrats is really creaky right now and
if that one cracks uh the rest go do you
know what the tent pole is that holds up
the entire Democrat
Party it's the fine people
hoax if the fine people hoax can be
debunked so that Democrats can see it in
a way that's you know credible
um that takes everything away and the
fact that the Republicans don't go after
that you know lot basically just people
like me pundits do I never really
understood that anyway uh Tim P abruptly
cut the his own live
stream uh because he had Laura lumer as
a guest and Laura lomer was talking
about you know getting getting back at
Democrats and that there was enough
crime there that if you know Trump got
back in office there would be a number
of people who should be dealt with with
the legal process however I think her
rhetoric
um reached a point where Tim P's entire
show was probably at risk if he didn't
pull it down
himself so I'm going to give Tim p a
big a big
compliment nicely done
nicely done so I'll tell you in softer
words what Laura ler said so that I also
don't get cancelled all right so Laura
lumer said that the the level of the uh
criminal
Behavior Uh consistent with the the laws
on the books for
treason uh might go to the level of the
death
penalty now here's the problem if you
were to say hey people might be guilty
of certain crimes here's why we think
they are uh the penalty for that could
be the death penalty it should be on the
table that's okay because you're just
talking about the law here's what I
think is too far and let's see if you
would have spotted it because Tim P did
so he's good at this
right um if you say let's get a list of
names of people and then before you've
tried them you say we want to kill these
people then you sort of become Alvin
Bragg
yourself you hear what I'm saying you
don't want to start with the person and
then talk about the death penalty unless
you've really had a lot of conversations
and in a court case that's you know
credible about those charges but it's
real dangerous to go full fonny Willis
and or who was it Leticia James and say
you're you know you're running for
office to get
Trump that's too far somehow she's not
paying for that but it's way too far so
Tim P I think very
smartly and very um
decisively said oh shoot she just gave
YouTube a predicate to cancel my whole
Channel and I'm not going to die on this
hill it wasn't even my opinion this was
a guest's opinion so nice move
nice move Tim P because the information
still gets out you know the social media
picks it up but he reduces his risk on
YouTube and he lives to fight
again totally respect for that nicely
played good good uh
decision-making um and uh I don't think
you could have played that better and
you know I don't mind that Laura lommer
has her opinion so it's not about her
opinion I think that part was fine it's
just you don't want to give YouTube you
know this fresh bash of of red meat to
cancel you because you know they want to
you know they want to cancel Tim pool so
well
played um Jonathan Turley still you know
National Treasure talking about any of
the legal elements of politics so he
talks about the fact that uh you know
the the whole situation where the
government or the Republicans we trying
to get a hold of the
audio that they only have the transcript
of of Biden doing his testimony to her
it's you are
and of course the Democrats say Hey you
have the transcript that's good enough
and then the Republicans say yeah but we
don't trust the transcript we think you
might have edited it and it might be way
worse than the transcript shows and we
have a right to know because if Biden is
not
capable um it's got to be 25th amendment
situation so they definitely have a
right to know I I completely support
their attempt to get that but listen to
according to turle uh the justice
department is making a new claim for why
they can't release the audio of
something they've already released the
transcript to can you think of any
reason why you wouldn't release the
audio when they've willing and already
and publicly and everybody's seeing it
the
transcript what reason could there be
other than it sounds really terrible
like really bad it must be
awful just guessing but listen to one of
the arguments that they just profer uh
they say uh that the audio tape must be
withheld this is from Jonathan Turley uh
due to the risk that it could be altered
by artificial intelligence and passed
off as an authentic in a deep fake
release
quote the passage of time and
advancements in audio artificial
intelligence and deep fake Technologies
only amplify concerns about malicious
manipulation of audio
files wouldn't that apply to everything
that anybody
has on
audio I I feel like that is such a a
stretch such a
stretch that it's almost just
laughable but I'm going to surprise you
it's not a terrible
argument like it it strikes you as
immediately absurd I me that's how it
struck me but let me let me support it
as best I
can it's somewhat rare that you would
have a situation where there's an audio
only because that's easier to De fake if
if it had been something he' said in
public it'd be easy to debunk it because
you'd say okay here's the real one he
said this in public now you can see how
the Deep fake changed it but since the
only public thing we'd have is an audio
that nobody listens to if somebody were
to take a clip out of it and you know do
a the 10-second clip where it sounds
like he said the NW or something
ridiculous then I think people would
believe it I do cuz if the headline
story said the audio tape is out and
then you saw a clip and then you played
it and you heard what you thought was
Biden's voice and he sounded really
dementia ridden and crazy and you know
saying racist stuff and
whatever you might believe it and we're
close enough to the election where a
fake audio tape could
actually change things remember the
audio tape of trump saying grab them by
the people thought that was going
to change the election it turns out it
didn't but is it a realistic risk that
when you're this close to an election
and it's the president who's running for
reelection and it's Audio
Only it is actually an unusually big
risk wouldn't you
agree because I think somebody would
alter it immediately that it's not even
a risk it would happen it it would
happen I I think you could say with
complete confidence that there would be
at least a parody version which people
would think was real at the very least
it would be a parody
version where he where he's just saying
crazy stuff so I don't think this should
be upheld because if you generalize this
it would be devastating to the normal
operation of the world but it's not
crazy it's not crazy that it opens the
door to a a bad thing happening but let
me let me suggest this and I think the
people asking for it will say the same
thing we already have the transcript and
we already have a zillion hours of Biden
talking on audio and other
places AI doesn't need the specific
audio from the event all you have to do
is run the transcript through it on a
voice that's trained as Biden and then
if that works you go back in and you
edit the transcript and feed back into
AI again so instead of saying the real
transcript in Biden's voice it adds H
and you know nword or some crazy thing
so I feel as if maybe the lawyers make
making this ask don't understand how AI
Works did they not understand that
whether we have the transcript or not or
whether we have the audio or not it
actually doesn't have any effect on
whether somebody would make a deep fake
yeah the the the def fect that they're
worried about could be made tomorrow
based on what's already publicly
available with no research whatsoever
you know just Google transcript and yeah
actually you don't even have to have the
transcript because if you're going to do
a fake one you can make up the
transcript nobody's going to check see
the the trouble with Fakes is that they
do their damage before they're debunked
and the debunk never gets the attention
of the original
so there's nothing that you couldn't do
right now to fake
that
um okay so Trump went to the UFC
yesterday got a standing ovation it was
crazy do you know what that standing
ovation at the UFC sounded like to me
well if he just heard it on the surface
it sounded like Yay Trump yay but here's
what I heard
we'll take the
outlaw did you see the
crowd almost all men well I mean
dominant male audience the men there
were very clearly by their reaction
saying Outlaw you just made him
better there's almost nothing you could
have done to
Trump that would have been as good for
his brand than becoming an outlaw to the
to the Crooked
government honestly I love
it my honest opinion without the spin
you know it's the spin season so even I
as much as I try to avoid spinning you
know everybody's going to do it this
this season but honestly you like in my
body and my real mind no
spin I just love that he's an outlaw
because the way he got there you know if
he'd robbed the bank I'd say no but the
way he got there oh
yeah yeah I want the outlaw absolutely
positively no qualms about it give me
the outlaw and that's what the UFC
audience basically said in their own
way but it gets better after UFC fighter
Kevin Holland won he uh jumped over the
ring and went right to president Trump
former president Trump and shook his
hands and said some private words to him
in support obviously Trump you know
slapped him on the shoulders and
obviously they're now friends uh you
should know that UFC fighter Kevin
Holland is black does it matter yes yep
because it's public and people are very
affected by social uh forces so if you
see a a uh black
Superstar um going right to president
Trump and congratulating
him that's powerful yeah a lot of Clips
on it likewise uh UFC fighter Sean
Strickland um said on the microphone to
the crowd president Trump you're the man
it is a damn travesty what they're doing
to you I'll be donating to you I'll be
donating to you is the key phrase
um by the way I don't know if you have
the current data but in the 48 hours
after the uh felony conviction
verdict um Trump had already earned $1.6
million per
felony per felony yeah and if you do the
math you know people say he's not really
a good business person but by my
calculations he invested
$130,000 and he got a return of 53
million that's some good investing you
know he doesn't get credit for that so
yeah it's a 1.6 million per felony uh
his his per indictment numbers are not
as good but but I think they'll be
improving as well so um I think we
should be measuring Trump's uh his uh
donation Gathering by felonies so if he
could get I feel like he's only maybe 12
to 17 felonies away from having all the
money he needs for the rest of the
campaign so I think we're like three or
four felonies away from being really
rich with
cash so there's
that um Trump also at the UFC announced
that he's uh getting on Tik Tock now you
might know that I think that Tik Tock
needs to be cancelled or D divested into
the US um
but as long as it's
there I I guess I gotta agree with vake
and with Trump if it's
there and it matters and it's a big way
to reach
voters sure why
not all
right David saaks and others are
pointing out the lawfare double standard
here that H Hillary Clinton did similar
things without penalty so here's how
David saaks explains it
uh he calls it the business records
double standard in 2016 Hillary
Clinton's campaign was fined
$8,000 that was it a fine of $8,000 for
the following for violating Federal
campaign Finance laws huh why her team
falsely reported the funding of the
steel dossier as legal services and
legal and compliance
Consulting well what does that sound
like huh this sounds exactly like what
Trump did exactly
what else do we know um according to
Sachs actually this opposition research
was an attempt to smear her opponent
with false and cacious salacious
allegations obviously it was also
intended to influence the election huh
so she recorded it
as a lawyer expense but
really no matter what she was thinking
because as Megan Kelly explained on her
uh video the other day that it doesn't
matter what anybody was thinking when
they did the expense it only matters
that a reasonable person could look at
and say well there's more than one
reason you would do
that so
when when Trump did his uh his uh
payments um it didn't matter that he was
thinking it was mostly about the
election this is Megan Kelly's take uh
it had more to do with the fact that a
reasonable person would say well there's
more than one reason you would want that
information not to get out you know
one's your family one's your business
reputation and the other is political so
if everybody agrees that there were
three reasons that should have been
reason enough that he can't be convicted
you need one
reason if there's three it's just sort
of automatically you're not you're not
guilty so uh Hillary obviously was
putting this into legal expenses to hide
her uh to hide her
contribution to the hoax of course
moreover says sax Hillary's campaign was
headquartered in New York state huh and
of Brooklyn New York which would make it
fall under the jurisdiction of New York
penal law 1751 the state law which makes
it a felony to falsify business records
with the intent to conceal the
commission of a
crime huh I feel like that steel dossier
thing was a crime
wasn't it it should have been I don't
know maybe it wasn't technically but
should have
been um and then the saxs asks what the
key distinction between Hillary's
campaign violation versus recent
news um and he concludes with Hillary's
violation there wasn't a Manhattan
prosecutor politically motivated to
bring an unprecedented case to trial now
as you know people who in the past may
have um leaned left in their politics
like Elon Musk and I'm not sure where
David sa saxs was but he's you know
clearly in the uh anti-biden train at
the moment so you see some people that
you wouldn't expect to be anti-biden who
are clearly anti-biden but uh let's look
at the rest of them because it's a
growing thing and I think the Dam's
about to burst
ABC news says this in a post like any
other American found guilty of a crime
Donald Trump is likely to face uh new
restrictions and lose a number of Rights
new due to his Newfound felon
status what about this choice of
words found guilty of a crime isn't that
an interesting phrase he was found
guilty why wouldn't you just say guilty
why wouldn't you just say now that he's
a
felon or now that the jury has concluded
he's a
felon why would you say that he was
found guilty instead of
guilty well let me put the hypnotist
filter on it as as a
hypnotist um I was trained that people's
choice of words reveals their
thoughts uh and all the time it's really
reliable
the choice of the words found guilty
instead of just guilty now I do
understand that found guilty is a common
phrase and it wouldn't be surprising to
see it used in other context but where
you have a choice and they obviously had
a choice of any words that wouldn't tell
the story why would you put found
guilty because found guilty has the odor
of we know he's not really guilty but it
is true that he was found guilty
it it suggests that the ABC News person
who wrote that post doesn't believe that
he was guilty because they're watching
the same thing we watched and it was
lawfare so look for that look for words
that you say to yourself they had a
choice of words and within all the words
they could have chose chosen they picked
the one that sends a flag it's sort of a
quite a signal but is there more well as
you know Eli hon who one of the main
legal Minds on CNN um said the trial
blew his mind and it's an unjustified
mess and basically he uh Eli honig
dumped on the lawfare of it exactly as
Republicans do in other words in a
purely factual way he just said it's law
fair garbage and it wouldn't have
happened to anybody else now that's a
big deal because he says that on CNN he
said his times on CNN and they're not
taking him off the air so CNN I'm going
to give them credit again um they do
seem to be pivoting towards something
like a reasonable middle we don't want
to get ahead of ourselves and say that
you know it's going to be a completely
clean situation but I see the
effort I mean to me it looks like
they're
trying because remember also
fared Zakaria said
directly that unless your name was
Donald Trump you never would have been
charged with this crime now that is
really clear there's no vagueness in
that fed is saying all right if you look
at the situation this is dirty I mean
that's just that's as clear as you can
be but it gets better uh you know how
many times I've told you that sanes is
the least biased person on
CNN well true to his brand he had
Charlamagne the God on you know
charlamagne's doing a book tour and uh
but Charlamagne is also famous for not
being pro Biden at the moment you know
he's not a lover of trump but he's very
clearly saying you know Biden's a mess
so SM smes has him on there and uh asked
if the verdict would change the outcome
of the election and here's what Charline
said he said so it's really which
candidate can energize their base and
situations like this it does energize
Trump's base I see Biden's base upset
with him over a number of things I do
think a situation like this gives them
something to fight for meaning the the
trumpers um now I saw somebody say that
they thought that smes' face and body
language suggested that he was going to
explode like he didn't like seeing it I
would suggest that you're reading him
completely wrong
smires knew exactly what Charlemagne was
going to say I mean not exactly but he
he knew what Charlemagne's message was
he invited him on the
show no he wasn't
surprised he wanted his audience to hear
Charlemagne's point of view just think
about
that he intentionally invited somebody
he knew was going to trash
Biden somebody who's black and is
influential smir did that here's what I
saw when I looked at Smur knish's face
and this is just subjective right but
remember I I have the perspective that
I'm already biased that he's
unbiased the look that I saw on his
face was just sort of like shock and
amazement like the rest of us so I think
he was just trying to keep a poker face
but I think he was having a reaction to
it but not the reaction that you know he
hated hearing it I think it was a
reaction of the moment we're in is a big
moment so what happens when all of those
people associated with CNN turn
completely on the story and agree with
the Republicans well they're not the
only ones Ellen dtz a famous Democrat
says Trump was unjustly convicted this
worst case in 60 years should never been
brought and the public should see the
judge's outrageous behavior now that's
pretty clear dtz is not saying I don't
know you could see this both ways nope
one of the most experienced and capable
legal Minds in the country a
Democrat said no this is totally crooked
totally crooked obviously crooked every
part of this is
crooked now I've taught you before that
if one of the major networks let's say
CNN or MSNBC say something is a fact but
then you go to the conservative Outlets
let's say breitbard or Fox News and they
say it's not a fact or vice versa one of
them says it's true and the other one
says
not it's usually
not usually not so or or let me put it a
better way you can't tell if it's
true it's just two versions now if you
could you know there's some objective
facts that they show you that you can
make up your own mind that's different
but you don't really know if something's
true if they disagree in their normal
way they disagree but it's
unusual that CNN and Fox News for
example would be on the same page about
anything and they're on the same page
that this was lawfare and it was
completely rigged system which is
phenomenal but here's the best
part um some of you know uh the name
Naval ravikant founder of angelist and
one of the most uh prominent investor
and thinkers in Silicon Valley what you
might not know about him is that he's
famously
non-political famously does a lot of
tweeting um you know he's one of the
most quoted people in uh in well most
quoted people in philosophy and
Technology at the moment success lot of
lot of different domains so he's
generally considered I've actually call
them the smartest person I've ever
met so let me say that again the
smartest person I've ever
met do you know how many smart people
I've met quite a few right so and I'll
stay with that you might be the smartest
person I've ever met now here I'm I'm
calling smart not just depth but
breadth he he can he can tell you the
better take on more to topics than any
human being I've ever met and it'll be a
different take and it'll be better than
one you had on so many different topics
it's crazy all right so when he talks
there are enough people certainly in the
investment world in the in the technical
World he's well known so when he says
anything that kind of Strays from his
non-political
stance your ears just go wait what did I
just
hear and here's what he said
he put two of Biden's uh posts on next
next to each
other and one of them was about Biden
bragging that he ignored the Supreme
Court to get um student loans
cancelled and then the next one was
where he was saying that nobody's Above
the
Law after the one where he said he got
around the
law
so naal quotes a famous quote from I
think some South American dictator type
and he and he said just this and nothing
else quote for my friends everything for
my enemies the
law now the way that quote is taken is
that when he says for my enemies the law
he doesn't mean just if they broke the
law that's the important part he means
you can use the law to get rid of
enemies and that's just the tool you use
and uh that is what we are
observing so now CNN has made it safe
for the least political person in all of
public
life to tell you that the former
president of the United
States is getting lawed right in front
of
you
now to you this might seem like a small
deal
but I don't think you quite understand
how much um how much persuasive
influence Nal has on the smartest people
in Silicon
Valley
he he is so
respected that when he puts down a stake
and I would say that he put down a stake
that this is too
far to get him to talk about anything in
the political domain and to make a
direct statement about it this is pretty
direct is
extraordinary I think the dam is about
to break I think CNN's already
broken I think the the investors in
Silicon Valley they're all going to turn
the Allin podcast is Allin Elon Musk
he's Allin
nval he just broke a long
tradition and and that I I'm I'm sure he
thought about it for a long time before
he did it something's happening that's
bigger than anything you could
imagine it it's not obvious yet but wow
you can feel it that there the the
feeling that things have gone too far is
so strong right now yeah the energy is
very
different and here's the part that uh I
was saving for you do you know what
judge M's first name
is how many of you know his first name
just off the top of your head have you
ever heard
it his first name is
Juan yeah Juan Muran that's the judge
that's going to jail Trump probably do
you know where he was
born Colombia country of
Colombia yeah judge judge
michan was born in Columbia
he's an
immigrant the judge that's judging
Trump is an immigrant from below the
Border does that sound like the right
choice the most famous build the wall
keep the South Americans where they are
of all time and his judge is one of the
people
that would have you know presumably the
biggest problem with that kind of
attitude gets
better uh his father was a military
officer in
Colombia military
officer for a while and then he later
served in
Colombia's intelligence
Services huh
colia what do we know about
Colombia what do we know about their
military what do we know about the
Colombian intelligence
Services let's see some people would say
that Colombia and the government and the
military are tightly connected with the
cartels some would
say and some would say that the cartels
are tightly linked with the American CIA
some would
say so let me ask you this if you were
the CIA and you knew that Trump didn't
even use your services for
intelligence and you knew that he was
talking about and other Republicans like
Tucker were talking about eliminating
the CIA and all of your jobs and you
wanted to stop
him who would be the best pick to do
that well
I would go with Juan meran father
military officer from Colombia who once
worked in their intelligence Services
somehow made it to the United States as
an immigrant and build quite a good
life that's who I'd
pick
so now I'm not going to make an
allegation because I don't know anything
about his
father but why does it look exactly like
you would think it would look if the
worst case scenario were true and that
the whole thing is the CIA and S fixed
why why does it look exactly like
that is that a
coincidence can can we write that off to
coincidence that it looks exactly like a
CIA
operation now again I'm only making
unfair inferences about people who are
known to be the types of people who
associate with other types of people so
that's a big you know I don't I don't
want to go further than that because
that would be
defamation so I'm not going to make a
claim that I know it's true I'm just
asking just asking don't you hate that
I'm
curious why there's such a big
coincidence involved especially when we
know that his selection was supposed to
be random but clearly wasn't because he
got three Trump cases in a row all
three so is it exactly what it looks
like
and in the meantime we hear the people
who are uh part of the deep State saying
that he's Merchant is going
to recommend jail
time despite the fact that nobody would
get jail time for this if they were not
Trump and the argument was because Trump
was sort of uh had a bad attitude and
violated the gag order so therefore they
would send him to
jail the that's the argument and and
that and on CNN one of the legal guys
was testing that argument out that's the
most absurd thing I've ever heard at the
same time there's a movement to change
the law so he can't get secret service
protection while he's in jail so he can
be
killed now uh I was talking with one of
my online buddies just before I went
live and you know I mentioned that it it
looked like on the surface it looks like
they're trying to kill him and he didn't
understand that I meant that literally
he thought I meant figuratively no
literally now I'm not going to say I
know that that's the case I'm going to
say if I were going to put odds on it
I'd say it's a 50% chance that there's
an active plan by our government to kill
Trump I think it's at least a 50%
chance and the reason I say that is that
we live through
Epstein if there had never been an
Ste if there had never been a Kennedy
who got assassinated if we didn't see
that RFK Jr also doesn't get secret
service protection for no good reason I
would have said okay our government
doesn't do things like that but clearly
they do things like that so yes they
they have an existential risk well to
their jobs uh if Trump becomes the
president again and what would they do
if they are the dirty tricks group of
the country the people who are selected
by their willingness to break
rules the CIA is
selected by their willingness to do
illegal things at least the operators
are because they're doing illegal things
in other
countries uh uh you could argue that
it's still legal in our country if they
do illegal things and it's authorized by
our country but that's sort of that's
sort of cutting it fine I mean they're
basically people who signed up for yeah
I'll go do super illegal things that'll
be my job and that way we would assume
that they wouldn't do super illegal
things when it's the very group that's
been
selected because they like to do or at
least they're willing to do super
illegal
things no it's at least a 50% chance
that they're trying to kill him Don JR
says the same thing it's not crazy it is
well within the parameters of what we've
seen if I'd never seen the laware
happen then I'd say well you know but
the courts are fair no they're not to me
it looks like the court case is driven
by the same people who are apparently if
you look at it on the surface on the
surface it looks exactly like a murder
plot with a statistical element which is
maybe they don't know for sure he'll be
killed in prison but they think there's
a good
chance
so anyway
that's
scary
um so uh over on
MSNBC The the stupid Network
representative Bowman's on there he says
if you stay home and you do not exercise
the power your vote you're giving your
power to white supremacist Mega
individuals you know where the white
supremacist Mega individuals are because
I I've never really seen one on the
news but I'm I'm going to take a
guess I think they're up in the
mountains with the white supremacist
militia that's forming they're hiding
away with the black guy who can't figure
out how to get an Ida to
vote and well you get it you get the
idea um V had an interesting legal take
I don't know if I'm buying it yet but
it's interesting um he says that Trump
can be pardoned by a
president uh for his New York conviction
even though it's a state matter normally
uh a president can only uh what would be
uh pardon or commute for something that
was a federal offense you can't do it
for a state charge and and Trump was
charged and convicted by the state
however the state's charges depended
entirely upon the fact that there were
also Federal
violations per their case so if you were
to uh pardon Trump from the federal part
of it it would make the state part of it
dissolve because the state part of it
depended on the federal part so even
though the federal part was not really
what the state found they still relied
on the jury thinking a federal thing had
been
violated so that they could apply the
state thing to the higher level
crime of felony because it supported the
other charge or vice versa one supported
the other I forget which way it went but
I don't know if I buy that I I it sounds
right but I feel like there might be an
alternative legal theory about whether
that's practical I like the thinking and
once again if it's
true if it's true how did we get this
far and why did V have to be the one to
bring it up because he went to a little
bit of law school so so he's the only
one have figured it
out man do we need him in the in the
government we need him so
much right even if he's wrong on this at
least he came up with this and that's
pretty
good anyway so the um yeah I do think V
is the primary thing that could keep
Trump alive if if they wanted to be vice
president and got nominated for that so
because he's the one that I think the
CIA would be most afraid of who not
named Trump so I think he's the way to
keep Trump
alive
um it would be wild if Trump nominated V
for vice president and said directly you
know what some other people were my top
choice but the V will keep me
alive can you imagine that cuz it was
real it's
real but he could say that directly you
know if a didn't want the job he wanted
to have a different role uh I had
somebody else in mind but honestly he's
the one who's going to keep me
alive I'd love to hear him say that
directly all right getting back into the
Soros
mystery uh I asked why is it that Soros
is doing what he's doing and I wanted
other people to explain it to me like
I'm an idiot so I could understand why
Soros would be funding so many things
that seem like disastrous for the
country that he lives
in right why would you destroy the
country that you live in now I I'm being
called naive and
uninformed and here's what I heard uh
from a user online that Soros supports
anarco tyranny all the things we're
seeing in the country because he
believes now this is the mind reading
part because he believes in a globalist
agenda that transcends National borders
uh and it wouldn't matter that he's a
citizen of the United States because
soros's preference would be that states
go away and he'll he'll do fine because
he's
Rich that ain't it
that ain't
it I I feel like this is an analysis
that comes from people who have never
been Rich may I give you my rich guy
analysis it's the only one you should
listen to Because Soros is Rich if
you're not hearing the opinion from
somebody also rich I mean I don't have
anything like his money but I've
experienced going from poor to to being
wealthy it changes you and here's the
thing you want the least if you're if
you're on top so right now he's sitting
at like the Pinnacle of human
beings you don't want that to
change if you're at the top the last
thing you want in a risk reward world
the last thing you want is to change the
whole system that you're dominating at
at the
top that introduces a risk of total
collapse that would take him from the
top to not the top it could make every
dollar he owns worth
nothing right so being in the top
1% let me tell you for sure because I'm
in it I don't want the whole system to
change dramatically in any
way now do I think that the whole system
should be changed dramatically yeah I
can think of lots of ways but I would
want to do them care
and without changing the general
structure of what got me to where I am
the last thing I want is to have the
country thrown into chaos and then I
have to figure out how to you know
create a good situation from scratch I'm
already in a good situation if you've
never experienced going from uncertainty
and economic you know low income to a
place where you would call yourself
wealthy when you get there the last
thing you want to do is change the whole
world into something you don't even know
what will happen nobody does that and
among the group of the nobodies who
would do that the top top top the very
number one person who wouldn't do that
is a person who's famous for being good
at risk
analysis that's what Soros is famous for
he's apparently unusually good at risk
analysis nobody with risk analysis
ability destroys the whole system
without a replacement you know that's
right online Nobody Does that so the
idea that he's in in favor of you know
destroying all the borders and forming a
global network is
crazy now here's the other
thing if a globalist One World
Government were to be
formed have you thought through who
would be in charge
that have you lived in the real world at
all if you form a real world government
of the you know top richest person
people like actually an official
government they would just fight with
each other it would be like the
Democrats and the Republicans they they
would be buying the fight of all fights
when none of them need a fight all the
billionaires are already the champions
of the world they can do whatever they
want they can affect governments easily
why would they change their situation
dramatically and if they did why do you
think Soros would be the you know like
top billionaire don't you think he would
get demoted as likely as
promoted it would be the craziest
riskiest chaotic thing to ever do if you
are already at the top the next thing is
that people say he's doing it for money
Scott you don't understand you know he
destroys countries and then he bets
against their currencies and then he
makes a whole bunch of money money now I
need a fact check on this but am I crazy
or is
Soros trying to give away his
money my understanding is he's trying to
donate most of it in the context of
trying to give away most of your money
you're not doing gigantic terrible
illegal things to make more money like
it doesn't even make
sense like how does that any of that
make sense so whatever is going on
here I have no idea I have no idea I
just know that the simplistic
explanations of a globalist One World
Government don't track at all with who
Soros is and I and I'm not reading his
mind I'm saying that nobody in that
situation would want that choice nor
have you ever heard
anybody show me show me a um show me a
billionaire who really wants uh
governments to go away and have one
world
government I I don't think there are any
and definitely not him because he's good
at risk management and nobody would
nobody would do that it would be
crazy
anyway so that's still a mystery let's
talk about the Israel peace deal uh as I
told you on day one it was always fake
so there's not there's not really a
peace deal that anybody's going to take
too seriously but it looks like Israel's
going to buy some time I don't know how
long it will take to get whatever they
need done in
Rafa but it's probably a few
months you don't think that they can
stall negotiations for two months of
course they
can of course they
can yeah the world economic forum is
even the more ridiculous
Theory yeah I think Elon Musk is right
about them being a club for rich
people uh if if Elon Musk isn't worried
and he's about as close to the inside of
the the world as anybody could be and he
seems totally uncon you know unconvinced
there's any danger there and I agree
with him completely I think it's just a
club for rich
people meanwhile in Ukraine Russia's
trying to uh they say bomb Kira what is
the second biggest city
it's not Kev it's
uh kir kirov or something I forget
anyway it looks like the Russians are
trying to take out their vital services
and depopulate it before they do
anything bigger so it looks like the
current method of taking over a city in
a military way is the American and
Israeli version as a little more boots
on the ground the Russian version is H
we'll go in when there's nothing left
car carco
kov thank you the city is kov
kov kov or kov one of
those
anyway not much happening there besides
the usual Badness that by the way
concludes my comments for today sorry I
ran long again I'm going to say bye to
uh YouTube and Rumble and X I'm going to
talk to the good folks on locals
privately the subscri
and uh I'll see the rest of you tomorrow
hope you enjoyed the show bye for now
locals hold on coming to
you
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e but