Episode 2355 CWSA 01/16/24
Match, meet gasoline. Let's talk about Iowa. If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. I'm pretty sure you've never had a better time. And today we've got the Iowa results and all kinds of stu
View segment →ff you're going to love. You're going to love it. And if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that only Iowa could understand, all you need for that is a copper mug or a glass, a tankard, a chalice, a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I l…
View segment →alled the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go. That's so good. So good. While you still have your beverage, would you join me in a toast to Vivek Ramaswamy for, in my opinion, the best campaign ever anybody ever ran? Honestly, the best campaign I've ever seen. He was flawless. He was flawless…
View segment →is reported on X by Mario Nawfal, who says that this year's WEF meeting at Davos appears to be heading in the usual direction of a drug-fueled bunga bunga sex party. Local escort service website officially announced all local service providers are completely booked during the WEF week, and sometimes…
View segment →d that before? Isn't that where the World Economic Forum goes to have their drug-fueled bunga bunga parties?" "Yes, but your husband's not involved in any of that, right?" "I don't think so." So if you want to take care of that, there's your path. Well, as you know, Trump had a solid victory in th…
View segment →n that? I don't think it was a rejection of DeSantis. It was not a rejection of Haley and it was not a rejection of Vivek. It's just they really, really, really like Trump. They really like him a lot and they want the revenge and they want their safety and they want their fighter who's going to put…
View segment →I learned: that there's a whole new level to engaging people with strongly differing viewpoints. Vivek showed you that it is actually possible to talk to people with wildly different viewpoints. And as small as that sounds it's everything. It's everything. It's the part that was missing. And it's be…
View segment →Pretend you didn't see it the first time. Get ready. Trump is so far in her head that he's on her head. Wasn't that better the second time? Much better the second time. All right, well that's happening. So Glenn, you're a superstar Glenn Greenwald but no I wouldn't be waiting for the self-reflectio…
View segment →e margin was like 450,000 votes. But the point is about the system. The point is not any specific outcome. The point is if you believe that anybody could look at our election and know it was safe, that's not a thing. There's nothing built into the system that is a safeguard to tell you that you'd ev…
View segment →s to be called a racist because to imagine it's anything else is just crazy. I mean you might be a brainwashed, blackmailed racist but still the same effect. All right. Here's a little Hunter Biden update just for fun. Remember where Hunter was going to have an art gallery but don't worry that he's…
View segment →of view which will not tolerate somebody sitting next to you debating it politely. Let that sink in. Misinformation is any information that is presented without the counterpoint. And I mean a legitimate counterpoint. A polite person who's not talking over you who's simply sitting there and presentin…
View segment →er response to being caught red-handed in this sketchy situation? Well it's probably racism she says. Probably racism. Surprise. And according to Rasmussen 50 percent of those they polled believe the allegations against Fani the district attorney. They believe the allegations basically and they thin…
View segment →h is super smart that was a little blind spot. Does he believe that was his one blind spot because I don't think so. I think he needs to know that climate change is another blind spot even if it's a real problem separate from the conversation of what's real and what's not. The way it's presented and…
View segment →le trace can kill you. 5,000 pounds that can kill a lot of people. That was in 2020. In 2021 well it's a little more than 5,000 pounds. In 2021 it was 11,200 pounds up from 5,000. 5,000 would kill a city but at least it slowed down. So in 2022 oh it didn't slow down it was 14,700 pounds of fentanyl…
View segment →ow I should be. I will say that if they with Estonia they're going to run into a problem. The Estonians well there's a friend of mine lives in Estonia and they don't want to piss him off because if they do they're going to piss me off and then I'm all in on Estonia. So don't mess with Estonia. You s…
View segment →ndividuals can excel of any type doesn't matter who they are. Tucker is having on the surgeon general I think of Florida a black gentleman who according to most Republicans his view is that the vaccines were horribly dangerous. So most of you would say he's doing a great job. He's a black man who e…
View segment →an say to that is just you really that doesn't work with anybody. There's nobody who's your example of all the people. You hard. All right that's all I have to say about that. All right ladies and g
View segment →entlemen that's enough for you on YouTube and Rumble and X. Thanks for joining and we'll have more fun tomorrow. Make sure you come back.
View segment →Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. I'm pretty sure you've never had a better time. And today we've got the Iowa results and all kinds of stuff you're going to love. You're going to love it.
And if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that only Iowa could understand, all you need for that is a copper mug or a glass, a tankard, a chalice, a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
Go. That's so good. So good.
While you still have your beverage, would you join me in a toast to Vivek Ramaswamy for, in my opinion, the best campaign ever anybody ever ran? Honestly, the best campaign I've ever seen. He was flawless. He was flawless in battle and he was flawless in defeat. And he appears to be so far flawless in his after-defeat. Although is it a defeat? Is it a defeat or is it a step up to 2028?
Anyway, thanks for the great work, the contribution to the thought, just showing us how it can be done, just showing the right way to do everything really. So to you, Vivek, sincerely appreciate it.
But you know there was another winner last night. We're going to talk about it. But first, while you're all pouring in here to watch this exciting live stream, and of course we're mostly going to be talking about Iowa and what's going on there, I thought I'd give you a little palate cleanser. How would you like to find a way to destroy the World Economic Forum and the Davos meeting? Do you think I can do it? You ready?
All right, here's a little news story. It's all you need to know to destroy the World Economic Forum. This is reported on X by Mario Nawfal, who says that this year's WEF meeting at Davos appears to be heading in the usual direction of a drug-fueled bunga bunga sex party. Local escort service website officially announced all local service providers are completely booked during the WEF week, and sometimes in both holes. They didn't say that but it feels like they should have.
The WEF's 2024 theme is, quote, "rebuilding trust."
All right, how would you like to end the WEF? Here's how you do it. A lot of you guys have spouses. Have your spouses ever heard of a description of your business meeting if your spouse is going to an international business meeting which can be accurately described as a quote drug-fueled bunga bunga sex party? Maybe you're not going next year, Jamie Dimon. Maybe you're not going next year. I'm not wrong. That's all it would take to end the WEF. All you have to do is tell their spouses what's going on. Because even if their particular spouse, they're pretty sure they're not involved, do you still want to have to explain why your husband's over there?
"So where's your husband?" "He's on a trip." "Really, a trip? That sounds interesting. Where's he going?" "He's overseas a little bit." "What did you say? Overseas? What's the name of the place he's going to?" "I can't hear you." "Davos." "Davos? Where have I heard that before? Isn't that where the World Economic Forum goes to have their drug-fueled bunga bunga parties?" "Yes, but your husband's not involved in any of that, right?" "I don't think so."
So if you want to take care of that, there's your path.
Well, as you know, Trump had a solid victory in the Iowa caucuses and broke some records. He got 51 percent, rounding off. It's the highest in the history of the Iowa Republican caucus, excluding the non-competitive years, the non-competitive years when he's not running against anybody in his own party. Trump got 51 percent. He won every county in Iowa. So that's not bad. How'd you do? I was all right. I won every county in Iowa. Every county.
Now, do you think this scared the people in MSNBC and CNN a little bit? We'll talk about that.
So let's see what else happened. So DeSantis got 21. I'm rounding off everything here. DeSantis 21 percent, Haley 19, and Vivek eight. So Vivek has conceded and he says he did not achieve his stated goal of surprising on the upside. In fact it was as if he had not even campaigned honestly. So the bad news is that doing an amazing campaign doesn't make any difference in Iowa. I mean no difference at all apparently. They'd made up their minds. So yeah, it doesn't matter the quality of your campaign, as MSNBC has pointed out, and I will point out as well.
It's kind of interesting that the Iowa results were in the exact order of whiteness. Now I'm not going to say that's why the Iowans picked who they did because there are lots of variables here, but it did come out in the exact order of how white they are, if you know what I mean. So I'm not sure that race isn't any part of this. You know, if we're going to be honest, there was probably a racial dimension. And I think a lot of people believed, this is what I heard, a lot of people believed that Vivek was a Muslim. No, I'd never even heard that. But you know, the people get confused with Hindu and Muslim and you know not everybody's fully versed in world religions. So I think that worried him. I think they were worried that maybe he wasn't as Christian as they are. And I think that might have been a small part of the equation, unfortunately.
But I think even more, a bigger part of the equation is they just love Trump. Can we agree on that? I don't think it was a rejection of DeSantis. It was not a rejection of Haley and it was not a rejection of Vivek. It's just they really, really, really like Trump. They really like him a lot and they want the revenge and they want their safety and they want their fighter who's going to put it all on the line. So I do not begrudge them their choice whatsoever. I think the fine people of Iowa chose well. Good job, Iowa. Good job, Iowa.
They have, however, found a way to throw a match on the biggest pile of gasoline we've ever seen in our lifetimes. So things are going to get real interesting. But I'm here for it.
Well, so Vivek says he's suspending his campaign. Is that the same thing as ending a campaign? Is suspending a campaign just simply what people always say, you know, just in case there might be some legal technicalities to why you say it that way? But I don't think we can ignore that the election is a long way away and Trump has a whole bunch of risks. So I do think that the reason that DeSantis and Nikki Haley are still in the race is because they'd like to just hang around a little bit longer to be the backup emergency spare.
Now Vivek, by immediately ending his campaign, by the way was that the perfect time to end it? Can you agree with me that the way Vivek played it was perfect? It was perfect. It was the exact situation. It was the exact time to do it. Waiting would have been a bad look, very bad look. Do it right away. Do it decisively. Do it clearly and cleanly. Tell, you know, say what you're going to do, which he did. He's going to help Trump. And perfect. I could not be happier sharing a country with Vivek with that kind of performance.
But here's the thing that I don't think anybody has quite figured out yet. Do you think the Democrats have figured out that they just weaponized Vivek? Vivek talking on behalf of Trump is pretty powerful stuff. Do you know what they just did? They just combined the two strongest forces possibly in the history of the Republican Party: the strongest force of nature with the smartest politician we've ever seen. And they're on the same side completely. Did they see that coming? I don't think people see this coming.
I think the thing that Vivek can add is he'll go on the show that won't invite Trump. You see the danger here? Because the CNNs and the MSNBCs are going to be hungry for content but they can't really invite Trump and they don't like to bring his lying pundits on because they don't like lying pundits according to them, you know what they determine to be a lie. But you know what Vivek doesn't do? He doesn't lie. Vivek has found a way to tell the Republican narrative without the need for any lies because there was never a need for any lies. It was never necessary. He was just the one smart enough to figure out it wasn't necessary to lie. You could do the whole story with any lies, right? The hyperbole certainly helps when you're persuading but you don't need it. It wasn't essential. He showed you that.
So this allows a way for the Trump-type message, which I would argue, I'm going to agree with Trump, it's not his message. He's basically trying to capture the American core feeling and try to expand it I guess. But you put Vivek on MSNBC, that's going to be fun stuff. And I don't think they cannot invite him because they can't say he's lying. Am I right? Have you ever heard them say that? Has MSNBC or CNN ever accused him of lying? They have not.
And now they've established that the reason for not letting Trump on, we'll talk about that in a minute, is that they don't want to show his lies. What are you going to say about Vivek? Yeah, they've got a lot of air time to fill. I think Vivek's going to be busy. In my view the only cure for Trump is Vivek. He's the only cure for TDS because he can give it to you the way that won't make you flip out when you hear it. This really changes everything. This changes everything.
And I don't know that the Democrats see what's coming yet because I don't think anybody in the Democrat Party has really followed Vivek. I mean a lot of Republicans didn't, which is part of the problem. They have no idea what's coming and this is going to be fun.
All right. And how did Trump take it when Vivek gracefully conceded? He immediately truthed back, "Thank you Vivek, a great honor." Did anybody have any concern that they wouldn't be good friends when this was over? I mean at least in terms of being on the same side? No. Do you know why? Because that's what they are. Trump is a fighter and then when you join his side you're done fighting. That's it. There's no grudge. Now you're done fighting. Now we move on. And they're both that person. Now they're done fighting. So good for them. That's how to show it.
Adam Townsend who was backing Vivek had this comment today. He said if you didn't learn something about yourself from watching Vivek these past few weeks, I don't know what to tell you. And then he says something I learned: that there's a whole new level to engaging people with strongly differing viewpoints. Vivek showed you that it is actually possible to talk to people with wildly different viewpoints. And as small as that sounds it's everything. It's everything. It's the part that was missing. And it's because the news has made it almost impossible to just tell the truth and get away with it. But he showed you how to do it. This is just really, even losing is one of the best things that's happened to America. It's kind of a weird irony.
All right, let's talk about Nikki Haley. So she came in third place, a little bit after DeSantis. And then so her summary is, "Tonight Iowa made the Republican primary a two-person race." Hold on. So this is Trump, DeSantis, there's Nikki Haley. So I don't know, you know what, who could help her with the math? Vivek. Yeah, Vivek. He's pretty good at math. He could help her with that. Yeah, no. You came in third. You came in third.
All right, but kidding aside, joking aside, her point if I understand it correctly, let's see if I understand her point, would be that DeSantis is too much of a Trump light. So DeSantis and Trump you could almost think of as like one person. So she's the alternative. And now she's a strong second, which is not a bad point. I mean maybe she could have said it better. But I see Mike Cernovich who had been backing DeSantis early but then switched to Vivek is wondering why DeSantis has not announced. But in DeSantis's favor I don't know that you could finish second and drop out, can you, in a four-person race? Because you know where do Vivek's votes go? I guess you wait till you find out, right? I mean if he picked up something from Vivek maybe gets a little closer in New Hampshire. Maybe Nikki Haley is going to take New Hampshire and then that makes DeSantis seem a little less relevant.
But I agree with Mike Cernovich that why DeSantis hangs on needs to be explained because it looks suspicious right now. There could be a legitimate reason that he's just staying around to make sure that there's a backup plan. He thinks he's the backup plan. America would be better off if there is a backup plan because I think we can all just say it directly. There has to be a backup plan, right? We could just say that out loud now, right? There has to be a backup plan because the Democrats have made it very clear that the level of threat they're putting on candidate Trump is something we've never seen before. This won't be like other things.
So yeah, and having Vivek inside the Trump tent, who I call the sword of truth, I'm hoping that catches on, Vivek Ramaswamy the sword of truth. I don't think the Democrats want to have a strong DeSantis, a strong Vivek just waiting around for the word in case it comes. The scimitar of truth. Damn you, that's better. Sorry, we're redoing it. It's now the scimitar of truth. Although that is, is scimitar more of an Arabian word? Yeah, scimitar maybe we go back to sword. We'll Americanize it. Yeah we better. We'll go back to sword. Sword of truth. Although to be fair a scimitar is an excellent word. Just doesn't fit here.
All right. Anyway, Nikki Haley saying that her third place finish makes it a two-person race probably works for young people because they can't do math either. So she's got that working for her.
Glenn Greenwald says this: the massive and historic size of Trump's victory should lead to some self-reflection about what caused the complete collapse of faith in the legitimacy of US institutions of authority and justice whereby voters so easily disregard four felony cases as irrelevant if not an asset.
Well Glenn, so I almost always agree with Glenn Greenwald's takes but not this time, Glenn. There isn't going to be any self-reflection. Where have you been? Now I know it's more of a hopeful thing. He's not predicting there'll be self-reflection which would be crazy. It was more of a gosh I hope we get some. But we're not going to get any self-reflection because the problem was never that the data or the arguments were wrong. It was never that. This is a medical problem. You can't fix a medical problem by self-reflection. "Oh I've got some cancer but a little self-reflection ought to take care of it." No, it's the wrong tool. Self-reflection will not help you with TDS. This is full-blown mass hysteria. A mass hysteria is a mental health problem like really, you know, no hyperbole. It's a mental health emergency I would say. And you can't fix it with better data. Better data doesn't help. Doesn't help anybody. You'd have to literally deprogram. And the funny thing is that the people who are most worried don't realize that they are the problem. They're actually the ones creating the mental health problem but they don't know it. They think that they're victims of something and not the perpetrators. So if you can't tell the difference between the victim and the perpetrator it's very unlikely that you're going to be working on some kind of a solution.
Now how crazy are things? Well let me tell you how crazy things are. So crazy in the full-out mass hysteria. The Joy Reid, MSNBC's one of her one of the biggest anti-Trumpers, is literally wearing a Trump wig to say that Trump is a bad person, right? She's literally dressing like him now. I was thinking I would like to get one of these Trump wigs so that every time Trump wins another primary you could wear it the next day. Like the next morning I'll just be wearing my Trump wig to talk about New Hampshire. I'm not wrong. You tell me that's a coincidence. You tell me that that's a coincidence. That is not a coincidence.
Now did she plan it? No. Did whoever did her hair, were they thinking I'm going to make you look like Trump? No, no. But it's not a coincidence, right? That this is a picture of the sort of the mass hysteria going physical. This is somebody who's so Trump is so in her head that he's on her head. God I like that so much I'm going to say it twice. Pretend you didn't see it the first time. Get ready. Trump is so far in her head that he's on her head. Wasn't that better the second time? Much better the second time.
All right, well that's happening. So Glenn, you're a superstar Glenn Greenwald but no I wouldn't be waiting for the self-reflection to handle it.
All right. Well, CNN and MSNBC, if you didn't watch the coverage from either of those networks you missed the best show. You missed the best show because watching the TDS coverage of Trump destroying the field in Iowa, it was really fun because I do watch it like it's a mental health show. Like it's just people just acting out with suffering. I don't really see it as news or anything even in that sort of general category. It's pure entertainment watching people suffering who kind of deserve it because God do they deserve it.
All right. So what happened was MSNBC last night when Trump got on to do his victory speech they decided to not show it. And Rachel Maddow said that she explained why NBC and other mainstream networks are not to show it because they say the caucus goers believe the lies but you know they don't want to be basically playing his lies. That's right. The news is going to decide that there was this one candidate who lies. Let me check the record. Let's see the political record of every candidate in the history of the United States. Looking. Let's see. AI can you tell me? I'm doing my research. Doing my research, huh?
Well there's an awkward problem here. It turns out that 100 percent of all candidates lied except for Vivek who's out of the race. So how do we handle that? So I guess MSNBC has gone to the ultimate level of censoring. They're going to tell you who's lying and then not let you see them. And they call that the news. How does MSNBC survive the political season because they've gone so far into the ridiculous? I mean they're just a farce at this point. It's just ridiculous. I feel like in the past they did a good job of pretending they were like news when they clearly weren't. But now they stopped pretending. They're just going to give up on all the pretending and they're just going to say we can't talk to you about the other side because we don't want you to know what they're thinking.
But again this is the problem that Vivek might slice through because he can break through that.
All right. Jake Tapper said that they would talk over Trump because as he said you could hear him repeating his anti-immigrant rhetoric. His anti-immigrant rhetoric. Anti-immigrant. I wonder where else we say things are anti when do you say you're pro something and when do you say you're anti something? Because I thought Trump was pro law and order, pro American legal citizens. I didn't realize he was anti something. Oh he's against something. That's a funny way to say it. So he's really, really for American and the way you'd say that is he's anti-immigrant. I don't believe that he's ever called himself anti-immigrant. I believe he's anti-crime. I believe he's anti-unenforced borders. I believe he's anti-chaos at the border with enormous terrorism risks. And Jake Tapper who is anything but a real newser says that's anti-immigrant.
Well I also don't like the way he talks about immigrants so I would agree with him that his choice of words not optimal and that's something Vivek can get right. But no he's not anti-immigrant. To say he's anti-immigrant is just crazy shit.
All right. Of course there'll be lots of discussions about whether 2020 was a stolen election. That will never go away. But Laura Loomer is reporting that CNN said that ahead of the Iowa caucus there was a poll: do you think Biden legitimately won in 2020? And CNN was forced to report on CNN's own network that when polled in Iowa by a majority of 68 percent, no. 68 percent have been watching their coverage for five years and just said nope. 68 percent. Now that's just in Iowa and that's probably just the Republicans because it's the Iowa caucus. So I mean that's high for anything but not as high if you consider that it's Republicans going to a caucus.
All right. But here's my recommendation. I believe it is not the high ground and you need the high ground. It is not the high ground to say the 2020 election was stolen. That's not the high ground. Here's the high ground. We have a system that is designed so you can't tell. That's the high ground. If you want to sound crazy say you know it was fixed and you can't prove it. Well then you look like crazy. Doesn't mean you're wrong. Doesn't mean you're wrong. But you would look crazy if you claim with certainty that it was rigged and then somebody says all right show your evidence. You go ah but some things are brewing right. So it doesn't really work as an argument except on your own side basically.
But here's the argument that can work. It's designed by intention so that you can't tell if it was rigged or not. Now that's the argument you want to get the other side into. That it's designed so you can't tell who won. Do you want some evidence of that? Now you're saying to me but Scott you're getting yourself right back into another situation where you don't have any evidence for your claim. Don't I? Well let's see if there's any recent news. Yes. Was it Virginia just found that there were thousands and thousands of votes that were not counted? Now it turns out that if they had been counted it would have been good for Trump. No it would have been good for Biden. Trump actually got overcounted. There were actually in Virginia there were like 4,000 too many votes for Trump. Now it's 2024 and we just learned that the count in Virginia was off by thousands of votes.
So the very least we could say for sure is that you can't tell if your result is accurate within thousands of votes for five years. That's a fact, right? They could not tell in Virginia if they had an accurate count for five years and then when they found out they didn't. Now 8,000 votes wasn't much. The margin was like 450,000 votes. But the point is about the system. The point is not any specific outcome. The point is if you believe that anybody could look at our election and know it was safe, that's not a thing. There's nothing built into the system that is a safeguard to tell you that you'd even counted all the votes. Just think about this. There's nothing about the system that tells you when you're done counting that you have counted all the votes. Just think about that problem. The most basic thing: did you count all the votes? We don't have a mechanism to know that. Yeah. Or did you undercount the votes or did you count them wrong? We have no mechanism to know any of that.
So to imagine that the real question is that a certain election was rigged, you're in the weeds. You're in the weeds and there's no place to go except talking to your own side which is good but it's not going to convince the others. If you want to convince the other team you say you realize that we're still finding votes five years later which proves they didn't know that they were lost when the election was certified which proves we don't have a system that can even tell you if we got all the votes and counted them. That's pretty basic. Pretty basic.
Do you think that the people who do all paper ballots don't have a way to know that all the pieces of paper that were put in the box were counted? Yeah they do. There's somebody who watches it. You put it in the box and then there's a bunch of people who watch you count it more than once. Yes in other places they absolutely know that every person who came in with a piece of paper that was a vote was actually counted. But we don't have that system.
All right. And of course Joe Biden came out with his divisive MAGA extremist statement. So Biden said looks like Donald Trump just won Iowa. He's a clear front runner blah blah. But here's the thing. This election was always going to be you and me versus the extreme MAGA Republicans. Can you tell us who the extreme MAGA Republicans are, Joe Biden? I think the news needs to ask him for names because if you can't name them you're talking about the voters, are you not? If he's talking about Stephen Miller being too close to Trump say it. Say his name and then we will decide if that's a reasonable statement. You know do we think this person or that person is too extreme? Well honestly I thought Stephen Miller was a little bit extreme in 2016. He's not extreme now. He's definitely not extreme now because his immigration policies are the exact ones we need which are to completely reverse all the way back to where it was when Trump was first in office.
So can you name the extremists? And then if you can name the extremists can you name the extreme policy? Was the extreme policy the one that treated our borders like every other country that is our ally? Well I guess they're not doing so well in Europe but you know the point. Is it extremist just securing your border? Is it that the Supreme Court moves the abortion question closer to the people into the states? Is that the extremism? Letting the people have more say locally? What exactly was the extremism? Is it they don't like his tax policies? Is that extreme? Somebody needs to nail down the people saying that they're MAGA extremists and say can you be more specific? Either give us their names or if what you're saying is it's like all the people in the movement just say it. Say what you mean. Tell us the truth for once.
All right. In my view that might be one of the worst messages I've ever heard in the history of the Republic because there are not many examples where the leader of your country stands in front of you and says the problem with our country is this group of you. Do you know who does that? China and the Uyghurs, right? So basically Joe Biden is trying to treat the MAGA people like the Uyghurs and that's okay? Yeah I don't want to use the H word because it's too overused so I'll go with China and the Uyghurs just for now. Yeah basically wants to treat them like some kind of despicable minority.
Well one thing that is clear, let me give you the theme for the coming months. Democrats will continue to look at people and Republicans will continue to look at policy. And every time you see it remind yourself that it's happening because only one of them is legitimate. If you're talking about policy you're in the right conversation even if your policy is wrong. But if you're saying the real problem is extreme MAGA Republicans what did you say about the policy? It's about the people. You're basically saying hate these people. I've never seen anybody promote hate of the population when you're trying to be the leader of it except Hitler of course and of course China with the Uyghurs.
So I think we should just call Joe Biden a racist every time he says something about MAGA extremists and anything about DEI and anything about ESG, CRT and all those other racist things. I think Biden just has to be called a racist because to imagine it's anything else is just crazy. I mean you might be a brainwashed, blackmailed racist but still the same effect.
All right. Here's a little Hunter Biden update just for fun. Remember where Hunter was going to have an art gallery but don't worry that he's laundering any money or selling favors because he won't even know who bought the art and there'll be like a wall between the art gallery and any politics? Well none of that was true. The art gallery guy says that Hunter would routinely ask him the names of the buyers and he'd tell them. And that Hunter is the only person who made art who asked for the names of the buyers. The regular artists that this gallery handles sell the artist's work but they don't tell them the name of the buyer because that would be sort of a privacy issue.
Now is there anything to worry about about the buyers? Oh yeah the buyers are exactly who you thought they would be. They are in fact big Democrat donors and people who want Democrat favors and got them. It's exactly what it looked like. And it gets better. The art gallery guy has talked to President Biden not Hunter. President Biden twice. Once in the White House at some event he chatted with the president and once President Biden called the art gallery guy personally to say some congratulations or something that his daughter did. So no Joe Biden did not say to the art gallery guy hey good work helping my son launder money but when the president of the United States calls you at work that has an impact. That has an effect. Yeah so it was exactly what you thought it was. The art gallery was exactly what it looked like.
The only question I have is whether Hunter is actually making the paintings now. I have conflicting evidence of that. One is I've never seen him paint except the one where he was like blowing something through a straw where normally he's snorting it through a straw. And so anybody could blow through a straw so that wasn't really an example of art. I want to see him actually make one of those paintings that are impressive because the artwork is actually very good. I want to see him make one of those. But I have heard through indirect means that he actually does stand in front of an easel and does actually paint. So maybe I'm wrong which would be fun. I would love to know that Hunter Biden was a world class artist. I would love to know that. That would be just fun. I'd be completely supportive of his artistic endeavors although the money laundering is still obviously an issue. But I don't know if he makes these paintings or not. I'm just kind of curious one way or the other.
All right. CBS News says according to our entrance poll most Iowa GOP caucus goers, I love that word you don't see it much you don't get to use that the rest of the year. I'm going to say caucus goer as often as possible today. Hey you caucus goers or you caucus growers. All right but anyway according to CBS News there six in 10 people who were Iowa caucus goers the GOP types, six in 10 said they would vote for Trump even if he's convicted of a crime.
What do the anti-Trump people say when they find out that six out of 10 Republicans will vote for him even if he's convicted of a crime? It's a cult. It's a personality cult. They must not read the news. They don't know the facts, right? Is there any hypothesis that CBS News and the others are leaving out? Could there be any other explanation for why would so many Republicans be willing to ignore an actual felony conviction? I can't think of anything. Can you think of anything?
Oh wait I've got something. I just thought of it and I posted this back to CBS. I said that maybe it's because most Iowa GOP caucus goers know the Democrat-driven lawfare against Trump is bullshit and so they plan to shove that down the throats of the media liars and watch them choke and die on it. That maybe possible? Am I anywhere near the zip code? Am I getting close? Yeah no yes no that's what it is. In case you're confused CBS let me say it again. Maybe like every one of the other Republicans they think the lawfare is bullshit. They think it's media driven and they want to shove it down your throats and watch you choke on it. That's what I want. That's what I want. I want to watch Trump shove it down their throats and watch them choke on it. No real violence you know in case you're confused. No no real violence. Hyperbole. We're talking in the figurative sense. Shove it down their throats. So that's the game I'm in. That's the game I'll be playing. The shove it down their throats game.
Let's see how many ways do you think the pro-Democrat news will find to describe dementia without calling it dementia? Well here's the latest entry from Axios who is as you know not really a legitimate news source more like a Democrat organ at this point. They report in a post lots of high-level Democrats are warning that President Biden and his re-election team are too complacent and unimaginative about the threat of losing to Donald Trump. Huh. They're complacent and they're unimaginative. What would be another word for that? Let's say you're really old. You're the president. You're very very old. Your brain's not working like it used to and indeed you can see little differences and maybe you're not as vigorous and active. You know maybe you're a little more complacent. And what if your brain isn't so good anymore that it could think of new and original ways to do things? What would that be called? All the unimaginative. What kind of a brain would be complacent and unimaginative? Well I can't think of a thing. Dementia.
All right. We've got a new standard for disinformation or we should. The WEF was talking about the big old risk of disinformation and the news is telling us about the risk of disinformation and lots of important people are telling us about the risk of disinformation. I have a standard which I would like to promote. A standard for what is disinformation and what is not. You ready? You're going to like it.
Because if we just say hey I think this is true what does the other side say? No it's not. And then the other side says but this is true and then what does the other side say? No it's not. So that's our current system. How's that working out for everybody? No it's not. It's not working out at all.
So I propose the following standard. Misinformation and disinformation, I'll put them together. The mis/disinformation is defined as any point of view which will not tolerate somebody sitting next to you debating it politely. Let that sink in. Misinformation is any information that is presented without the counterpoint. And I mean a legitimate counterpoint. A polite person who's not talking over you who's simply sitting there and presenting the other side. And of course you would have the chance to speak back. It's always disinformation if you're seeing one side.
So when the WEF officials, I just saw a video, were up there complaining about disinformation they were disinformation because there should have been somebody sitting right next to them saying it's not disinformation it's a different opinion. You just think it's wrong. Now if that person had been sitting there showing the counterpoint I would say well there's some information for me. There's a person who has this point of view. There's another person who has another point of view. I can compare them. That's called information. What's it called if only one of them is on the stage? Disinformation every time. It might be true sometimes but that would be like a weird situation. No one person talking without the benefit of a counterpoint is disinformation by definition, right? Because everybody's lying in politics except for Vivek, right? If it's not Vivek or you know Thomas Massie you know maybe you can add you know Paul you know Rand Paul and a few others but basically if it's somebody in the news or a pundit or somebody running for office usually it's not true in some way.
So I would use the same standard whether it's a Republican or a Democrat. If it's one person talking of course it's disinformation. Now if it's one person giving a campaign speech we all kind of put that in context don't we? Aren't we all grown up enough to know one politician giving a speech is not supposed to look like complete truth? I think we all know that right? You have to hear the other side. But when somebody's let's say in a news capacity, let's say you're Joy Reid and you're just giving one side of things that's disinformation by its nature. You don't even need to know the details of what she said. If she's giving one point of view and there exists a counterpoint or a context that's missing that's all you need to know. Yeah it's just information if there's only one person talking. What do you think that should be your standard? That this whole thing about one person talking might be true and might be false that's absurd in politics. One person talking is just every time. Right now like I said you could point out some weird exceptions but there's a reason that Vivek came in fourth. If he lied better he probably would have done a lot better. Imagine if Vivek had lied he probably could have done a lot better. Yeah but he just wasn't willing to go there.
All right. NPR was according to Pfizer King 64, NPR is talking today about the path forward for Nikki Haley. NPR is still talking about Nikki getting in there. The path forward is that something terrible happens to Trump. Can we stop talking about the path forward because I'm pretty sure it's a path backwards if you know what I mean. She might have a path backwards into the presidency but it's only if something terrible happens to the leading candidate. So no NPR we don't treat you as a legitimate news source.
Speaking of illegitimate things are you following the story of one of Trump's district attorneys, Fani you know Fani Willis. So it turns out she was having an affair with the prosecutor who was handling the Trump prosecution. Now by itself that doesn't bother me too much honestly. I didn't really want to make a thing about that because people have affairs. People who go to work in an office sometimes they hook up and I thought well that doesn't necessarily mean there's something wrong with this process. However yeah which one of them was married? Was it the guy who was married or was he? He was yeah he got divorced just recently but yeah allegedly right allegedly had an affair.
So but here's the part that'll get under your skin I think. It turns out that the boyfriend she gave the job to is nowhere near qualified for the job. He had never been involved in anything like this at this scale. And for some reason that we don't understand it was necessary for him to spend like two days at the White House talking to the Democrats and billing for it. So it doesn't look like he's legitimate. It looks like she was giving her boyfriend some free money which makes her look like she is corrupt.
Now separate from the question of whether she's corrupt when it comes to charging Trump she's clearly corrupt because she's doing this thing with her boyfriend and sending him money. Now you could say to yourself but Scott we don't know that there's any corruption. We just know it's a boyfriend. He's not quite capable and she's sending him a lot of money through allowing him this possibility this opportunity. Yeah we don't know. We don't. No no but in these situations the appearance of impropriety is the same as the impropriety would you agree? For all practical purposes the appearance of impropriety is a you got to recuse yourself situation. So yeah. They went on vacations together. Yeah so everything about it is corrupt sounding and sketchy. I don't know that any of it was illegal. I don't know that anybody's alleging that but yeah there's a lack of transparency. See here there's something very much to be concerned about and it's as sketchy as hell.
And what is her response to being caught red-handed in this sketchy situation? Well it's probably racism she says. Probably racism. Surprise. And according to Rasmussen 50 percent of those they polled believe the allegations against Fani the district attorney. They believe the allegations basically and they think that she had an improper relationship. Again that's not illegal but ethically it's a bottom of the barrel. So the most unethical DA got busted for that anyway.
All right let's talk about Bill Ackman. As you know Bill Ackman was successful in getting the president of Harvard to step down and you know he's anti-DEI now. So he's always voted Democrat but he was very anti-DEI when he found out what that was all about in Harvard. So now he's educated about that and he says that if you haven't figured it out already it is now abundantly clear that Trump is going to crush Biden in the election. Now that does seem abundantly clear if Trump makes it all the way to election day. I don't think it's abundantly clear that he's going to make it to election day. You know we could just say that out loud now because I do think the bad guys are that bad. I don't know it'll happen. I'm not predicting it'll happen but they are that bad. Yeah we're we do live in that world and we need to grow up a little bit.
But Bill Ackman decides he's going to back the challenger or I guess the main challenger you could say to Biden which is Dean Phillips. However it is an awkward discovery that Dean Phillips has on his website a pro-DEI statement. So the anti-DEI guy has decided to back the pro-DEI guy for president. Now people of course pointed that out. Hey Bill Ackman we like what you did there in Harvard but do you know you're backing a pro-DEI candidate? What does Bill Ackman say who is no quitter by the way? He's not a quitter. He says that Phillips didn't understand DEI and that he expects that statement will be changed soon because they're educating him about what DEI really is. So no problem. Yeah once he corrects that little imperfection then he'll have a good package to take forward right? Because that's kind of a small thing isn't it? Little small thing. No Bill Ackman it's not a small thing that he was a racist this week. He's a racist this week. I'm not going to vote for him next week because he edited his web page. No Bill you got to give up on this one.
And by the way I love Bill Ackman like huge fan. I'm sure it's not reciprocal so I'm not depending on him liking me for me to like what he's done. I like what he's done period. He's a patriot. He's a plus in terms of the stuff he's done here. I don't know what else he's done in his life but everything I saw him do I liked a lot. But this is my friendly advice. You can't back a guy who had a DEI statement on his. He's just a racist or he's a racist enabler or worse. He didn't understand the biggest issue in the country and he's running for president. This is the biggest issue. This is the biggest issue. Yeah if you think and because this issue permeates all the other issues it's why you're afraid to fly it's why the cities are full of immigrants it's why property crime is high it's why our budget is breaking. It's DEI. And Dean Phillips didn't know that the core problem in the United States was a problem? No that's not a small problem to correct. That is game over. You're done if you ever had that on your website. You're done.
So I know I do love that Bill Ackman is a fighter so he'll probably stay with it but my advice is to just cut your losses. I don't know what he needs to do instead because I mean he's not going to back a Republican it looks like but you just can't back the guy who had a DEI statement. You just can't do that. There's no place to work with that. So that was a hell of a bad start.
And now if Bill Ackman would like to stick with Dean Phillips I have some further questions for him to ask. Hey Dean Phillips tell us your view on climate change right? What do you think Bill Ackman's going to say when he hears this guy's view on climate change? I don't know what it is but he's a Democrat so do you think Bill Ackman believes the climate change alarmist and wants to get rid of fossil fuels as quickly as possible? There's no way Ackman's going to hear the actual arguments pro and con and back the Democrat side because we've seen him in action. He's too smart for that.
Now keep in mind Ackman also didn't realize that DEI was a toxic time bomb right? So as smart as he is which is super smart that was a little blind spot. Does he believe that was his one blind spot because I don't think so. I think he needs to know that climate change is another blind spot even if it's a real problem separate from the conversation of what's real and what's not. The way it's presented and the solutions that are presented get rid of fossil fuel right away. These are not serious people and I can't believe that a smart person once hearing all arguments would still back somebody who was on that side of it. It's hard to believe.
All right. How about if he ask Dean Phillips what he thinks about all the problem with the white supremacists? Ask Dean Phillips if he thinks there's a MAGA extremist problem and give us their names just like Biden. See I think Bill Ackman needs to if he's going to be this influential and he seems to be very influential I feel like he owes it to the rest of us to dig in a little bit deeper. Just dig in a little like you did with DEI. So you know I give Ackman a full pass for correction right? So my standard for judging people I say this all the time it's not that you got one wrong that's not the problem. Getting one wrong is just normal. We all get stuff wrong. But how do you deal with it? How do you deal with being wrong? You know how did Vivek deal with not getting his prediction right in Iowa? Honestly, quickly, clearly and with humility. That's how you do it.
All right so yeah Dean Phillips has a lot to explain.
Vanguard the company the big company that has lots of index funds just an enormous financial entity. We hear today from the End Wokeness account on X that first of all they control 7 trillion dollars in assets. 7 trillion do they control in assets. And their new class of interns has almost no white people in it and the employees are given courses on white fragility and engaging white males to advance DEI and they're also big backers of ESG.
So for many decades I have very full-throated endorsed Vanguard funds because what the funds are is they're unmanaged funds. An index fund is just like a basket of stocks and a basket of stocks is a real good way to invest and they have reasonably low fees. So the things you want are an honest company that can tell you don't invest in individual stocks buy this basket of stocks because diversification is good. That's very good. That's why I like Vanguard. The people who had invested in Vanguard funds from the beginning of the fund would be really happy because their index funds did great. That's the whole point. So Vanguard is a very credible successful financial institution which I have very happily recommended lots of people for I don't know 30 years. I've probably been recommending them at the top of my list for 30 years.
Today I disrecommend them as a racist organization and I don't believe that they should get any of your money and if you have any money in there and it doesn't cost you too much I would yank it out immediately because I don't think you can support this or you should. It leads to a bad place. You don't want to be supportive of racist companies no matter which direction the racism goes. So this is just pure racism and I get that they're trying to correct years of having too many white people and white men in positions. I get that. I know what they're trying to fix but don't do it this way. This is we can't do business with you if this is who you are. So I absolutely disrecommend Vanguard funds for anybody who cares about racism.
Well it turns out that Claudine Gay who was the president of Harvard that stepped down there are many movie offers multi-million dollar movie offers made about the situation. Christopher Rufo who was one of the primary people besides Bill Ackman trying to get her to step down he asked who would play him in the movie. So Christopher Rufo is asking who would play him in the movie and an account called John Stokes made a suggestion. It says my money's on Idris Elba. I've been laughing about that all morning.
All right if you didn't know Idris Elba is a very good black actor who's going to be I think that they've agreed to play James Bond. Is that deal been made or is that just something they're talking about? I don't know the details but that was the discussion. So now let me say again Idris Elba is great and he could play a great James Bond. I would definitely watch that movie. So I don't have any problem with that. That's not the hill I'm going to die on. I think a good actor can play whatever they want. So the fact he's a great actor should be the key thing to understand from that but that's pretty funny. Get Idris Elba to play Christopher Rufo. Well well.
In the less good story this also comes from End Wokeness one of my new favorite accounts. Fentanyl seizures at the border. I'll give you a little history. In 2020 they found almost 5,000 pounds of fentanyl at the border. That's just what they found. Now 5,000 pounds of fentanyl do you know how much that is because like a little trace can kill you. 5,000 pounds that can kill a lot of people. That was in 2020. In 2021 well it's a little more than 5,000 pounds. In 2021 it was 11,200 pounds up from 5,000. 5,000 would kill a city but at least it slowed down. So in 2022 oh it didn't slow down it was 14,700 pounds of fentanyl then. Now again that's only the parts they caught that doesn't count what got through just what they caught.
All right but thank God Joe Biden's talked to China so and Mexico so they could get that number down. And I'm happy to report that for the year 2023 the number is oh 27,000 pounds. It takes two and a half pounds of fentanyl to kill half a million people. Carry the three times four that's enough to kill every single person in the United States. Good job Joe. Good job. There's now enough fentanyl to kill every human being in the United States. You know where we should start getting serious when there's enough to kill every pet too because people I don't care about them but if the pets start getting into it well we've got to draw the line there.
How in the world can Trump lose this election if it's a fair election? He can't. That's why it's not going to be a fair election I don't think. There's not a chance. Whoever is behind this is who's running the country would you agree? Whoever is behind all this fentanyl coming in is running the country at least in important ways because if the president were in charge there are lots of ways to stop it. I mean what else to say about it? I mean this is so absurd at this point that I don't get it anyway.
So how about all that news about Ukraine huh? You know I hate that I look on social media and I turn on the news and it's just Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine. They just can't stop talking about it right now. The news kind of stopped. So more news kind of stopped. And how about Gaza? How about those latest casualty figures from Gaza right? Did the news stop? The news stopped right? So we got two major wars and three three three wars four if you count the border yeah. And the news decided oh you know what's interesting Iowa? It's really cold in Iowa. How about those UFOs? Hey look at the UFOs.
Well here's a there's now a story that there are leaked German plans for World War II. No not causing World War II that I'm going to throw you a little surprise. The news is reporting that Germany is preparing to fight against, wait for this, World War II. Yeah they'd actually be on our side this time apparently. They'd be on our side so that's good news. The worry is that Russia if they wrap things up in Ukraine they feel emboldened by it because they got some property that they would start going after the Baltics. Let's see what's there that you got your Estonia your Latvia and your Lithuania. Now Joe Biden probably thinks Lithuania is where we get our lithium so maybe we do but that would be a weird coincidence. I don't think we get any lithium from Lithuania but it would be funny if we did anyway.
So it turns out there are a number of Russian nationals in Estonia Latvia and Lithuania. I don't know I feel like we should just let Russia have all the Russian-speaking people and just say can you just take all the Russians will you leave us alone if you have all the Russians? Because that's making it a little too easy for him because I feel like he can win all the Russians but if he tries to take over Poland well now I got a bigger problem because honestly I'm not super concerned about the borders of Lithuania. I know I should be. I will say that if they with Estonia they're going to run into a problem. The Estonians well there's a friend of mine lives in Estonia and they don't want to piss him off because if they do they're going to piss me off and then I'm all in on Estonia. So don't mess with Estonia. You should leave that one alone if Putin. Are you listening Putin? I figure he probably watches my show trying to learn English Putin. I don't know about Lithuania and Latvia but you better keep your hands off Estonia. Better keep your hands off of that one. That's going to be a different game. So that's just a warning for you anyway.
As Germany said when these leaked plans came out so the plans involve an assumption that Putin keeps going and keeps conquering stuff and then what would they do about it? But as the German military quite reasonably and rationally says we plan for everything. And that should have been the story. So they shouldn't have had to ask the German general hey is this what you plan to do? No we plan for everything. That's what we do. We just make sure we've considered every possibility. This is one of the possibilities so we plan for it. So I'm not sure that this means they think it's going to happen. It just means it would be very smart to have a contingency plan. So they're just being smart.
Are you kidding me there is a lithium battery energy storage park in Lithuania? Come on come on come on it's that's actually true. Lithium battery storage facility of Lithuania. There had to be.
All right well I think we should trick Putin into attacking Elbonia because if we can get Putin to put all of his resources into Elbonia well then they wouldn't exist because Elbonia doesn't exist. So that's my plan.
All right ladies and gentlemen there was so much news today I don't think I even saw it all. Was there any big story I forgot to mention? I feel like there's something big I'm forgetting to mention. I did hear on MSNBC that the experts are saying they don't necessarily think that any of Trump's trials will have an outcome before the election and they're real worried about that because if the outcome is after the election then I suppose he pardons himself or the country ignores it or something. Buy a blonde wig. Everybody wants me to wear a Joy Reid wig. Oh sword of truth sounds like sort of yeah that yeah that's a problem.
Comment says Bill Ackman is not anti-woke he wanted Claudine Gay because she's not Jewish says you. Now five of eight Ivy League schools have Jewish presidents and the problem with that is what's your problem with that? Yeah see the problem is what are we supposed to do tell the Jewish population of America to stop over succeeding? What do you want to do about that? Is anybody claiming they got their job because they're Jewish? If you can claim that then we have something to talk about. If they didn't get their job because they're Jewish then you don't have anything to talk about. It just means that one group of Americans is excelling. Would you want them not to be in the country? Would you want the Jewish Americans who are qualified enough to be running major Ivy League institutions would you want them to go to some other country? They're like insanely great assets of the country and you're bitching about them doing too well. That's like saying Vivek is too smart so there's something suspicious going on. I think we need to accept exceptionalism from individuals and maybe get over it. Yeah just get over it. Individuals can excel of any type doesn't matter who they are.
Tucker is having on the surgeon general I think of Florida a black gentleman who according to most Republicans his view is that the vaccines were horribly dangerous. So most of you would say he's doing a great job. He's a black man who excelled is saying what you want him to say better than the rest according to Republicans probably would say that. So why can't people just do well like what's the problem if somebody who doesn't look like you does great? Why do they propagate so much anti-whiteness? Well I don't think the Jews are doing it are they? You think that well yeah I mean if they are it's because they're college presidents it's not because they're Jewish. Yeah no I don't think that has to do with Jewish. That has everything to do with Democrats. If it's something that's common to every single Democrat and the Democrats are super diverse how are you picking one group out? You I think you have some self-reflection to do there. Do a little self-reflection on that.
All right what else we have going on? UFO grifters. How many of you would say it now seems obvious that the UFO thing is nothing but a planned distraction? How many of you would say that? That's fair to say.
So let me call out a comment that I see a lot. This comment says Scott has a blind spot for the quote chosen people. Epstein shows you how success is achieved really. So Epstein is an example of all Jews? You just you that's the only thing I can say to that is just you really that doesn't work with anybody. There's nobody who's your example of all the people. You hard.
All right that's all I have to say about that.
All right ladies and gentlemen that's enough for you on YouTube and Rumble and X. Thanks for joining and we'll have more fun tomorrow. Make sure you come back.
good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams I'm pretty sure you've never had a better time and today we've got the Iowa results and all kinds of stuff you're going to love it you're G to love it and if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that only Iowa could understand all you for that is a copper marar glass a tankered Chalin a canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine of the day the thing that makes everything better is called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now go that's so good so good what while you still have your beverage would you join me in a toast to V ramaswami for in my opinion the best campaign ever anybody ever read uh honestly the best campaign I've ever seen he was Flawless he was Flawless in battle and he was Flawless in defeat and he appears to be so far Flawless in his after defeat although is it a defeat is it a defeat or is it a step up to 2028 anyway uh thanks for the great work the uh contribution to the thought the uh just showing us how it can be done just showing the the right way to do everything really so to you vake sincerely appreciate it but you know there was a another winner last night we're going to talk about it but first while while you're all pouring in here to watch this exciting live live stream and of course we're mostly going to be talking about Iowa and what's going on there but I thought I'd give you a little pallet cleanser how would you like to find a way to destroy the world economic forum and the Davos meeting do you think I can do it you ready all right here's a little news story it's all you need to know to destroy the world economic Forum um this is reported on X by Mario nul who says uh that this year's wef meeting at Davos appears to be heading in the usual direction of a drug fueled Bunga Bunga sex party local escort service website officially announced all local service providers are completely booked during the wef week and sometimes in both holes they didn't say that but it feels like they should have um the wef's 2024 theme is quote rebuilding trust all right how would you like to end the WF here here's how you do it a lot of you guys have spouses uh have your spouses uh ever heard of a description of your business meeting if your spouse is going to an international business meeting which can be accurately described as a quote drug fueled Bunga Bunga sex party maybe you're not going next year Jamie Diamond maybe you're not going next year I'm not wrong that's all it would take to end the WF all you have to do is tell their spouses what's going on because even if the you know their their particular spouse they're pretty sure they're not involved do you still want to have to explain why your husband's over there so where's your husband he uh he's he's on a trip really a trip say that's sounds interesting where's he going he he just overseas a little bit no what' you say over overse what's the name of the place he's going to what I can't hear you Davos Davos where have I heard that before isn't that where the world economic Forum goes to have their drug fueled bonga bonga parties yes but your husband's not involved in any of that right I don't think so so if you want to take care of that there's your path well as you know Trump had a solid victory in the Iowa caucuses and uh broke some records he got uh 51% rounding off it's the highest in the history of the Iowa Republican caucus excluding the non-comp itive years the non-competitive years when he's not running against anybody in his own party Trump got 51% he won every County in Iowa so that's not bad how'd you do I was all right I won every County in Iowa every County now do you think this scared the uh people in MSNBC and CNN little bit we'll talk about that yeah so let's see uh what else happened so Dan santis got 21 I'm rounding off everything here D santis 21% Haley 19 and V eight so v um has conceded and he uh he says he did not achieve his stated goal of surprising on the upside in fact it was as if he had not even campaigned honestly so the bad news is that doing an amazing campaign doesn't make any difference in Iowa I mean no difference at all apparently they' made up their minds so yeah it doesn't doesn't matter the quality of your campaign as MSNBC has pointed out uh and I will point out as well it's kind of interesting that the iio results were in the exact order of whiteness now I'm not going to say that's why the Iowans picked who they did because there are lots of variables here but it did come out in the exact order of how white they are if you know what I mean so I'm not sure that race isn't any part of this you know if we're going to be honest there was probably a racial Dimension and I think a lot of people believed uh this is what I heard a lot of people believe that uh V was a Muslim no I i' never even heard that but you know the people get confused with Hindu and Muslim and you know not everybody's fully versed in in world religions so I think that worried him I I think they were worried that you know maybe he wasn't as Christian as they are um and I think that I think that might have been a small part of the uh the equation unfortunately but um but I think even more a bigger part of the equation is they just love Trump can we agree on that I don't think it was a rejection of dtis it was not a rejection of Haley and it was not a rejection of aake it's just they really really really like Trump they really like him a lot and they want the revenge and they want their safety and they want their fighter who's going to put it all on the line so I do not I do not begrudge them their choice whatsoever I think the f people of Iowa um chose well good job Iowa good job Iowa uh they have however found a way to throw a match on the biggest pile of gasoline we've ever seen in our lifetimes so things are going to get real interesting but I'm here for it well so f f says he's suspending his campaign is that the same thing as ending a campaign is suspending a campaign just simply what people always say you know just in case uh there might be some legal technicalities to why you say it that way but I don't think we can ignore that the election is a long way away and Trump has a whole bunch of risks so I do think that the reason that De.
Santis and Nikki Haley are still in the race is because they'd like to just hang around a little bit longer to be the backup mergency spare now V by immediately um ending his campaign by the way was that the perfect time to end it can you agree with me that the way V played it was perfect it was perfect it was the exact situation it was the exact time to do it waiting would have been a bad look very bad look do it right away do it decisively do it clearly and cleanly uh tell you know say what you're going to do which he did he's going to he's going to help uh Trump and perfect I I could not be happier uh sharing sharing a country with vake with with that kind of performance but uh here's the thing that I don't think anybody has quite figured out yet do you think the Democrats have figured out that they just weaponize vake V talking on behalf of V is pretty powerful stuff do you know what they just did they just combined the two strongest forces possibly in the history of the Republican Party the strongest force of nature with the smartest politician we've ever seen and they're on the same side completely did they see that coming I don't think people see this coming I I I think the what the thing that V can add is he'll go on the show that won't invite Trump you see the danger here because the CNN's in the msnbc's are could to be hungry for Content but they can't really invite Trump and they don't like to you know they don't like to bring his lying pundits on because they don't like lying pundits according to them you know what they determin to be a lie but you know what V doesn't do he doesn't lie V has found a way to tell the Republican narrative without the need for any lies because there was never a need for any lies it was it was never necessary he was just the one smart enough to figure out it wasn't necessary to lie you could you could do the whole story with any lies right the hyperbole you know certainly helps when you're persuading but you don't need it it was wasn't essential he showed you that so this allows a way for the Trump type message which I I would argue I I'm going to agree with Trump it's not his message he's he's basically trying to capture you know the American core feeling and you know and try to uh expand it I guess but you put vake on MSNBC that's going to be fun stuff and I don't think they cannot invite him because they can't say he's lying am I right have you ever heard them say that has NS NBC or CNN ever accused him of lying they have not and now they've established that the reason for not letting Trump on we'll talk about that in a minute is that they they don't want to show his lies what are you going to say about the yeah they got a lot ofir time to fill I think the's going to be busy in my view the only cure for Trump is a vake he's the only cure for TDS because he can give it to you the way that won't make you flip out when you hear it this really changes everything this changes everything and I don't know that the that the Democrats see what's coming yet cuz I don't think it I don't think anybody in the Democrat Party has really followed V I mean a lot of Republicans didn't which is part of the problem they have no idea what's coming and this is going to be fun all right uh and how did Trump take it when VI gracefully uh conceited he immediately truthed back uh thank you vake a great honor did anybody did anybody have any concern that they wouldn't be good friends when this was over I mean at least in terms of being on the same side no do you know why because that's what they are Trump is a fighter and then when you join his side you're done fighting that's it there's no grudge now you're done fighting now we move on and they're both that person now they're done fighting so good for them that's that's how to show it uh Adam townend who was backing v um had this comment today he said uh if you didn't learn something about yourself from watching V these past few weeks I don't know what to tell you yeah uh and then he says something I learned that there's a whole new level to engaging uh people with strongly differing viewpoints V showed you that it is actually possible to talk to people with wildly different viewpoints and as small as that sounds it's every everything it's everything it's it's the part that was missing and it's because the news has made it almost impossible to just tell the truth and get away with it but he he showed you how to do it it's just this is just really the even losing is one of the best thing that's happened to America it's it's kind of a weird irony all right let's talk about Nikki Hy so she uh she came in uh third place and a little bit after De.
Santis and then so her summary is tonight Iowa made the Republican primary a two-person race hold on so this is Trump um De.
Santis there's got the Nikki Haley was so I don't know you know what who could help her with the math V yeah v he's pretty good at math he could help her with that yeah no uh uh you you f you came in third you came in third all right but kidding aside joking aside her point if I if I understand it correctly uh let's see if I understand her point would be that De.
Santis is too much of a trump light so disantis and Trump you could almost think of as like one person so she's the alternative and now she's you know strong second which is not a bad point I mean maybe she could set it set it better but uh I I see Mike cernovich who had been backing disantis early but then switched to the who's wondering why De.
Santis has not announced but in desantis's favor I don't know that you could finish second and drop out can you in a four-person race because you know where do where do V's votes go I guess you wait till you find now right I mean if he picked up something from V maybe gets a little closer in New Hampshire maybe maybe Nikki H is going to take New Hampshire and then that makes D Santa seem a little less relevant but I agree with uh I agree with Mike covich that why De.
Santis hangs on needs to be explained because it looks suspicious right right now there could be a legitimate reason that he's just staying around to make sure that there's a backup plan he thinks he's the backup plan America would be better off if there is a backup plan because I think we can all just say it directly there has to be a backup plan right we we could just say that out loud now right there has to be a backup plan because the the Democrats have made it very clear that the level of a threat they're putting on candidate Trump is something we've never seen before before this won't be like other things so yeah and and having V inside the uh Trump tent uh who I call the sword of truth I'm hoping that catches on V ramaswami the sword of truth uh I don't want you I don't think I don't think the Democrats want to have a strong De.
Santis a strong V uh just waiting around you know for the word in case it comes the Scimitar of Truth damn you that's better sorry we're we're doing we're redoing it it's now the Scimitar of Truth although that is is Scimitar more of a Arabian word yeah citar maybe we go back to sword we we'll American we'll americanize it yeah we better we'll go back to sword sword of truth although to be fair is simp SAR is an excellent word just doesn't fit here all right um anyway Nikki Hy saying that uh her third place finish makes it a two race probably works for young people because they can't do math either so she's got that working for um Glenn Greenwald says this H the massive in historic size of Trump's Victory should lead to some self-reflection about what caused the complete collapse of faith in the legitimacy of us institutions of authority and Justice whereby voters so easily disregard four felony cases as irrelevant if not an asset well Glenn uh so I almost always agree with Glenn greenwald's takes but not this time Glenn there isn't going to be any self-reflection where have you been now I I know it's more of a hopeful thing he's not he's not predicting there'll be self-reflection which would be crazy you more it was more of a gosh I hope hope we get some but we're not going to get any self-reflection because the problem was never uh that the data or the arguments were wrong it was never that this is a medical problem you can't you can't fix a medical problem by self-reflection oh I've got some cancer but a little self-reflection ought to take care of it no it's a wrong tool self-reflection will not help you with TDS this is full-blown Mass hysteria a mass hysteria is a mental health problem like really you know no hyperbole it's a mental health emergency I would say and you can't fix it with better data better data doesn't doesn't help doesn't help anybody Health you'd have to literally deprogram and the funny thing is that the people who are most worried don't realize that they are the problem they're actually the ones creating the mental health problem but they don't know it that they think that they're victims of something and not the perpetrators so if you can't tell the difference between the victim and the perpetrator is very unlikely that you're going to be working on some kind of a solution now how crazy are things well let me tell you how crazy things are so crazy in the full out Massy areia The Joy Reed msnbc's you know one of her one of the biggest anti-trumpers uh is literally wearing a trump a trump uh wig to say that Trump is a bad person right she's literally dressing like him now I was thinking I would like to get one of these Trump wigs so that every time Trump wins another primary you could wear it the next day like the next morning I'll just be wearing my trump wig to talk about you know New Hampshire I'm not wrong you tell me that's a coincidence you tell me that that's a coincidence that is not a coincidence now did she plan it no did whoever did her hair were they thinking I'm going to make you look like Trump no no but it's not a coincidence right that this is a picture of the sort of uh the mass hysteria going physical this is somebody who's so Trump is so in her head that he's on her head God I like that so much I'm going to say it twice pretend you didn't see it the first time get ready Trump is so far in her head that he's on her head wasn't that better the second time much better the second time all right well that's happening so Glenn uh you're a superstar Glenn Greenwald but uh no I wouldn't be waiting for the self-reflection to handle it all right well um CNN and MSNBC if you didn't watch the coverage from either of those networks you miss the best show you miss the best show because watching the TDS coverage of trump destroying the uh the field in Iowa it was really fun because I do watch it like it's a a mental health show like it's just people just acting out with suffering I don't really see it as news or anything even in that sort of General category is pure entertainment watching people suffering who kind of deserve it um because God do they deserve it all right so what happened was MSNBC last night when Trump got on to do his victory speech they decided to uh not show it and Rachel mad M said uh that uh she explained why NBC and other mainstream networks are not to show it uh because um they say the caucus goers believe the lies but you know they don't want to they don't want to be basically playing his lies that's right the news is going to decide that there was this one candidate who lies uh let me let me check the record um let's see the political record of every candidate in the history of the United States looking let's see uh AI can you tell me I'm doing my research doing my research huh well there's an awkward problem here it turns out that 100% of all candidates lied except for vake who's an of the race so so how do we handle that so I guess MSNBC has gone to the ultimate level of censoring they're going to tell you who's lying and then not let you see them and they call that the news how does MSNBC survive the uh the political season because they've gone so far into the ridiculous I mean they're just a farce at this point it's just ridiculous I I feel like in the past they did a good job of pretending they were like news when they clearly weren't but now they they stop pretending they're just going to give up on all the pretending and they're just going to say we can't talk to you about the other side because we don't want you to know what they're thinking but and again this is the problem that vake might slice through because he can he can break through that all right uh Jake Tapper said uh that they would talk over Trump because uh as he said you could hear him uh repeating his anti-immigrant rhetoric his anti-immigrant rhetor anti-immigrant H I wonder where else we say things are you know like anti when when do you say you're Pro something and when do you say you're anti something because I I thought Trump was pro- Law and Order pro-american legal citizens I didn't realize he was anti something oh he's against something that's a funny way to say it so he's really really for American and the way you'd say that is he's anti-immigrant I don't believe that he's ever called himself anti-immigrant I believe he's anti- crime I believe he's anti- unenforced borders I believe he's anti chaos at the border with enormous terrorism risks and Jake Tapper who is anything but a real newsers says that's anti-immigrant well I also don't like the way you talks about immigrants so I would agree with him that his choice of words not optimal and that's something V can get right but uh no he's not anti-immigrant to say he's anti-immigrant is just crazy ship all right um of course there'll be lots of discussions about whether 2020 was a stolen election that will never go away um but um Laura lumer is reporting that uh uh CNN said that ahead of the uh Iowa cauas there was Iowa caucus there was a poll do you think Biden legitimately won in 2020 and CNN was forced to report on CNN's OWN Network that when ped Ian said by a majority of 68% no 68% have been watching their coverage for five years and just said nope 68% now that's just in Iowa and that's probably just the Republicans because it's the Iowa caucus so I mean that's high for uh anything but uh not as high if you consider that it's Republicans going to a caucus all right um but here's my recommendation um I believe it is not the high ground and you need The High Ground it is not The High Ground to say the 2020 election was stolen that's not The High Ground here's The High Ground uh we have a system that is designed so you can't tell that's The High Ground if you want to sound crazy say you know it was fixed and you can't prove it well then you look like crazy doesn't mean you're wrong doesn't mean you're wrong but you would look crazy if you claim with certainty that it was rigged and then somebody says all right show your evidence you go ah ah but some things are Brewing right so it doesn't really work as an argument except on your own side basically but here's the argument that can work it's designed designed by intention so that you can't tell if it was riged or not now that's the argument you want to get the other side into that it's designed so you can't tell who won do you want some evidence of that now you're saying to me but Scott you're getting yourself right back into another situation where you don't have any evidence for your claim don't I don't I well let's see if there's any uh recent news um yes uh was it uh Virginia just found that there were thousands and thousands of votes that were not counted now it turns out that if they had been counted it would have been good for Trump no it would have been good for Biden Trump actually got overcounted that there were actually in Virginia there were like 4,000 too many votes for Trump now it's 2024 and we just learned that the account in Virginia was off by thousands of votes so the very least we could say for sure is that you can't tell if your result is accurate within thousands of votes for five years that's a fact right they could not tell in Virginia if they had an accurate count for 5 years and then when they found out found out they didn't now 8,000 votes wasn't much you know the the margin was like 450,000 votes but the point is about the system the point is not any specific outcome the point is if you believe that anybody could look at our election and know it was it was safe that's not a thing there is no there's nothing built into the system that is a safeguard to tell you that you'd even count counted all the votes just think about this there's nothing about the system that tells you when you're done counting that you have counted all the votes just think about that that problem the the most basic thing did you count all the votes we don't have a mechanism to know that yeah or or did you undercount the votes or did you count them wrong we have no mechanism to know any of that so to imagine that the real question is that a a certain election was rigged you're in the weeds you're in the weeds and there's no place to go except talking to your own side which is good but it's not going to convince the others if you want to convince the other team you say you realize that we're still finding votes five years later which proves they didn't know that they were lost when the election was certified which proves we don't have a system that can even tell you if we got all the votes and counted them that's pretty basic pretty basic do you think that the people who do all paper ballots don't have a way to know that all the pieces of paper that were put in the Box were counted yeah they do there's somebody who watches it you put it in the box and then there's a bunch of people who watch you count it more than once yes in other places they absolutely know that every person who came in with a piece of paper that was a vote was actually counted but we can't we don't have that system all right um and of course Joe Biden came out with his divisive Mega extremist statement so Biden said looks like Donald Trump uh just won Iowa he's a clear front runner blah blah but here's the thing this election was always going to be uh you and me versus the extreme magga Republicans can you tell us who the extreme Maga Republicans are Joe Biden I think the news needs to ask him for names because if you can't name them you're talking about the voters are you not if he's talking about Steven Miller being too close to Trump say it say his name and then we will decide if that's a reasonable statement you know do we think uh you know this this person or that person is too extreme well honestly I thought Steven Miller was a little bit extreme in 2016 he's not extreme now he's definitely not extreme now because his his his immigration policies are the exact ones we need which are to completely reverse all the way back to where it was when Trump was first in office so can you name the extremists and then if you can name the extremists can you name the extreme policy was the extreme policy the one that uh treated our borders like every other country that is our Ally well I guess they're not doing so well in Europe but you know you know the point it is the extremist just securing your border is that it is is it uh moving is it that the Supreme Court moves the abortion question closer to the people into the states is that the extremism letting the people have more say locally what exactly was the extremism is it they don't like his tax policies is that extreme you somebody needs to nail down the people saying that they're magga extremists and say can you be more specific either give us their names or if what you're saying is it's like all the people in the movement just say it say what you mean tell us the truth for once all right um in my in my view that might be one of the worst messages I've ever heard in the history of the Republic because there are not many examples where the leader of your country stands in front of you and says the problem with our country is this group of you do you know who does that China and the Wagers right so basically Joe Biden is trying to treat the magga people like the Wagers and that's okay yeah yeah I don't want to use the HW because it's too overused so I'll go with China and the Wagers just for now yeah basically wants to treat them like a some kind of Despicable minority well one thing that is clear let me give you the theme for the coming months Democrats will continue to look at people and Republicans will continue to look at policy and every time you see it remind yourself that it's happening because only one of them is legitimate if you're talking about policy you're in the right conversation even if your policy is wrong but if you're saying the real problem is Extreme Mega Republicans what did you say about the policy it's about the people you're basically saying hate these people I've never seen anybody promote hate of of the population when you're trying to be the leader of it except Hiller of course and of course China with the Wagers so I think we should just call Joe Biden a racist every time he says something about Maggie extremists and anything about Dei and anything about ESG CRT and all those other racist things I I think Biden just has to be called it racist because to to imagine it's anything else is just crazy I mean you might be a brainwashed uh blackmailed racist but still the same effect all right uh here's a little Hunter Biden update just for fun remember where Hunter was going to have an art gallery but don't worry that he's laundering any money or selling favors because he won't even know who bought the art and there'll be like a a wall between the art gallery and any politics well none of that was true the the art gallery guy says that Hunter would routinely ask him the names of the buyers and you tell them and that Hunter is the only person who made art who asked for the names of the buyers the regular artists that this Gallery handles sell the artist work but they don't tell them the name of the buyer because that would be sort of a privacy issue now is there anything to worry about about the buyers oh yeah the buyers are exactly who you thought they would be they are in fact big Democrat donors and people who want uh Democrat favors and got them it's exactly what it looked like and it gets better the art gallery guy has talked to president President Biden not Hunter President Biden twice once in the White House at some event he chatted with the president and once President Biden called The Art Gallery guy uh personally to say some congratulations or something that his daughter did so no Joe Biden did not say to the art gallery guy hey good work uh helping my son launder money but when the president of the United States calls you at work that has an that has an impact that has an effect yeah so it was exactly it's exactly what you thought it was the art gallery was exactly what the only question I have is whether Hunter is actually making the paintings now I have I have conflicting evidence of that uh one is I've never seen in paint except the one where he was like blowing something through a straw where normally he's you snorting it a straw and so anybody could you know blow through a straw so that wasn't really an example of art I want to see him actually make one of those paintings that are impressive because the artwork is actually very good I want to see him make one of those but I have heard through indirect means that he actually does stand in front of an easel and does actually paint so maybe I'm wrong which would be fun I I would love to know that Hunter Biden was a world class artist I would love to know that that that would be just fun I'd be completely supportive of his Artistic Endeavors although the money laundering is still obviously an issue but I don't know if he makes these paintings or not I'm just kind of curious one way or the other all right um um CBS news says according to our entrance poll most Iowa GOP caucus goers I love that word you don't see it much you don't get to use that the rest of the year I'm going to say caucus goer as often as possible today hey you caucus goers or you caucus Growers all right but anyway according to CB CBS News um there six in 10 people uh who were Iowa caucus goers the GOP types 6 and 10 said they would vote for Trump even if he's convicted of a crime what do the anti Trump people say when they say when they find out that 6 out of 10 Republicans will vote for him even if he's convicted of a crime it's a cult it's a personality cult they must not read the news they don't know the facts right is there any hypothesis that CBS News and the others are leaving out could there be any other explanation for why why why would so many Republicans be willing to ignore an actual felony conviction I can't think of anything can you think of anything oh wait I've got something I just thought of it and I posted this back to to CBS I said that um maybe it's because most Iowa GOP caucus goers know the Democrat driven lawfare against Trump is and so they plan to shove that down the throats of the media liars and watch them choke and die on it that maybe maybe possible am I am I anywhere near the ZIP code am I getting close yeah no yes no that's what it is in case you're confused CBS let me say it again maybe like every one of the other Republicans they think the lawfare is they think it's media driven and they want to shove it down your throats and watch you choke on it that's what I want that's what I want I want to watch Trump shove it down their throats and watch them choke on it no real violence you know in case you're confused no no real violence hyp we're talking in the figurative sense sh shove the down their throats so that's the game I'm in that's the game I'll be playing they shove it down their throats game um let's see how many ways do you think the uh pro Democrat news will find to describe dementia without calling it dementia well here's the latest entry from AOS who is as you know not really a legitimate new source more like a Democrat you know organ at this point um they report in a post lots of highlevel Democrats are warning that President Biden and his re-election team are too complacent and unimaginative about the threat of losing to Donald Trump huh they're complacent and they're unimaginative what would be another word for that let's say you're really old you're the president you're very very old your brain's not working like it used to and indeed you can see little differences and maybe you're not as vigorous and uh active you know maybe you're a little more complacent and what if your brain isn't so good anymore that it could think of you know new and original ways to do things what what would that be called Al the unimaginative unimag what kind of a brain would be complacent and unimaginative well I can't think of a thing dementia Hiller uh we've got a new uh standard for uh disinformation or we should the WF was talking about the the big old risk of disinformation in the every the the news is telling us about the risk of disinformation and lots of important people are telling us about the the risk of disinformation I have a a standard which I would like to um promote a standard for what is disinformation and what is not you ready you're going to like it because if we just say hey I think this is true what does the other side say no it's not and then the other side says but this is true and then what does the other side say no it's not so that's our current system how's that working out for everybody no it's not it's not working out at all so I propose the following standard misinformation and disinformation I I'll put them together the Mis disinformation is defined as any point of view which will not tolerate somebody sitting next to you debating it politely let that sink in misinformation is any information uh that is presented without the Counterpoint and I mean a legitimate Counterpoint a polite person who's not talking over you who's simply sitting there and presenting the other side and of course you would have you would have the chance to speak back it's always disinformation if you're seeing one side so when the wef officials I just saw a video were up there complain about disinformation they were disinformation because there should have been somebody sitting right next to them saying it's not disinformation it's a different opinion you just think it's wrong now if that person had been sitting there showing the Counterpoint I would say well there's some information for me there there's a person who has this point of view there's another person who has another point of view I can compare them that's called information what's it called if only one of them is on the stage disinformation every time it might be true sometimes but that would be like a weird situation no one person talking without the benefit of a Counterpoint is disinformation by definition right because everybody's lying in politics except for vake right if it's not vake or you know Thomas Massie you know maybe you can add you know Paul you know Rand Paul and a few others but basically if it's if it's somebody in the news or a pundit or somebody running for office usually usually it's not true in some way so I would use the same standard whether it's a Republican or a Democrat if it's one person talking of course it's disinformation now if it's one person giving a campaign speech we all kind of put that in cont context don't we aren't we all grown up enough to know one politician giving a speech is not supposed to look like complete truth I think we all know that right you have to hear the other side but when somebody's let's say in a news capacity let's say you're Joy read and you're just giving one side of things that's disinformation by its nature you don't even need to know the details of what she said if she's giving one point of view and they're exists a Counterpoint or a context that's missing that's all you need to know yeah it's just information if there's only one person talking what do you think that should be your standard that this whole thing about one person talking might be true and might be false that's absurd in politics one person talking is just every time right now like I said you could point out you know some weird exceptions but there's a reason reason that a came in fourth if he lied better he probably would have done a lot better imagine if a had lied he probably could have done a lot better yeah but he just wasn't willing to go there all right um NPR uh NPR was according to fiser King 64 uh NPR is talking today about the path forward for Nikki Hy NPR is still talking about Nikki getting in there the path forward is that something terrible happens to Trump you can can we stop talking about the path forward because I'm pretty sure it's a path backwards if you know what I mean she might have a path backwards into the presidency but it's only if something terrible happens to the leading candidate so no NPR we don't treat you as a legitimate news source speaking of illegitimate things are you following the story of one of Trump's um was she uh District attornies uh fonnie you know fonnie f n n funny what's her last name I forgot to write it down Willis funny Willis so it turns out she was having an affair with the prosecutor who was handling the Trump prosecution Now by itself H that bother me too much honestly I didn't really want to make a thing about that because people have affairs people who go to work in an office sometimes they hook up and I thought well that doesn't necessarily mean there's something wrong with this process however yeah which one of them was married was it the guy who was married or was he he was yeah he got divorced just recently but but um yeah allegedly right allegedly allegedly had a fair um so but here's the part that'll get under your skin I think it turns out that the boyfriend she gave the job to is nowhere near qualified for the job he he had never been involved in anything like this at this scale and for some reason that we don't understand it was necessary for him to spend like two days at the White House talking the Democrats and billing for it so it doesn't look like he's legitimate it looks like she was giving her boyfriend some free money uh which makes her look like she is uh corrupt now separate from the question of whether she's corrupt when it comes to charging Trump she's clearly corrupt because she's doing this thing with her boyfriend and sending him money now you could say to yourself but Scott we don't know that there's any corruption we just know it's a boyfriend he's not quite capable and she's sending him a lot of money through allowing him this possibility this uh this uh opportunity yeah we don't know we don't no no but in these situations the appearance of impropriety is the same as the impropriety would you agree they for all practical purposes is um the the appearance of impropriety is a is a you got to recuse yourself situation so yeah yeah uh they went on vacations together yeah so everything about it is uh corrupt sounding and sketchy I don't know that any of it was illegal I don't know that anybody's um alleging that but yeah there's a lack of transparency see here there's something very much to be concerned about and it's as sketchy as hell and what is her response to being caught red-handed in this sketchy situation well it's probably racism she says probably racism surprise um and according to rasmuson 50% of those they pulled believe uh the allegations against uh funny the district attorney um they believe the allegations basically and they they think that she had an improper relationship again that's not illegal but ethically it's a bottom of the barrel so the most unethical unethical DA got busted for that anyway all right let's talk about uh bill akman as you know bill akman was successful in getting the uh president of Harvard to step down and you know he's anti- Dei now so he's uh always voted Democrat but he was very anti- Dei when he found out what that was all about in Harvard so now he's educated about that and he says that uh if you haven't figured it out already it is now abundantly clear that Trump is going to crush Biden in the election now that does seem abundantly clear if Trump makes it all the way to election day I don't think it's abundantly clear that he's going to make it to election day you know we could just say that out loud now because I do think the bad guys are that bad I don't know it'll happen I'm not predicting it'll happen but they are that bad yeah we're we do live in that world and we need to grow up a little bit but Bill Amman decides he's going to back uh the Challenger or I guess the main Challenger you could say to uh to Biden uh which is Dean Phillips uh however it is an awkward discovery that Dean Phillips has on his website a pro Dei statement so the anti- Dei guy is decided to back the pro Dei guy for president now people of course pointed that out hey um hey Bill Amman we like what you did there in Harvard but um do you know you're backing a pro Dei candidate what does Bill akman say who is no quitter by the way he's not a quitter he says uh that Phillips didn't understand Dei and that he expects that statement will be changed soon because they're educating him about what Dei really is so no problem yeah once he corrects that little imperfection then uh he'll have a a good package to take forward right because that's that's kind of a small thing isn't it little small thing no bill Amman it's not a small thing that he was a racist this week he's a racist this week I'm not gonna vote for him next week because he because he edited his his web page no bill you got to give up on this one um and by the way I love Bill akman like huge fan I'm sure it's not reciprocal so I'm not depending on him liking me for him for me to like what he's done I like what he's done period he's a he's a patriot he's he's a plus in terms of the stuff he's done here I don't know what else he's done in his life but uh everything I saw him do I liked a lot but this is my friendly advice you can't back a guy who had a Dei statement on his he's just a racist or he's a racist enabler or worse he didn't understand the the biggest issue in the country and he's running for president this is the biggest issue this is the biggest issue yeah if you think and and it because this issue permeates all the other issues it's why you're afraid to fly it's why the cities are full of immigrants it's why you know uh property crime is high it's why our budget is breaking it's it's Dei and Dean Phillips didn't know that the core problem in the United States was a problem no that's not a small problem to correct that is game over you're done if you ever had that on your website you're done so I know I do love that bill akman is a fighter so he'll probably stay with it but my my advice is to just uh cut your losses I don't know what he needs to do instead because I mean he's not going to back a republican it looks like but you just can't back the guy who had a Dei statement you just can't do that that there's no place to work with that so that was a hell of a bad start um and now if Bill Amman would like to uh you know stick with Dean Phillips I have some further questions for him to ask Hey Dean Phillips tell us your view on climate change right what what do you think Bill amman's going to say when he hears this guy's view on climate change I don't know what it is but he's a Democrat so you do you think Bill Amman believes the CL the climate change alarmist and wants to get rid of fossil fuels as quickly as possible there's no way the amman's going to hear the actual arguments pro and con and back the Democrat side because we've seen him in action he's too smart for that now keep in mind the acman also didn't realize that Dei was a talk xic Time Bomb right so as smart as he is which is super smart that was a little blind spot does he believe that was his one blind spot because I don't think so I think he needs to know that climate change is another blind spot even if it's a real problem separate from the conversation of what's real and what's not the way it's the way it's presented and the solutions that are presented get rid of fossil fuel right away these are not serious people and I can't believe that a smart person once hearing all arguments would still back somebody who was on that side of it it's hard to believe all right um How about if he uh ask Dean Phillips what he thinks about all the problem with the white supremacists ask Dean Phillips if he thinks there's a mega extremist problem and give us their names just like Biden see I think Bill Amman needs to if he's going to be this influential and he seems to be very influential I feel like he owes it to the rest of us to dig in a little bit deeper just just dig in a little like you did with Dei so you know I give I give acman a full pass for correction right so my my standard for judging people I say this all the time it's not that you got one wrong that's not the problem getting one wrong is just normal we all get stuff wrong but how do you deal with it how how do you deal with being wrong you know how how did vake deal with uh not getting his prediction right in Iowa honestly quickly clearly and with humility that's how you do it all right so yeah Dean Phillips has a lot to explain um Vanguard the company the big company that has lots of uh index funds just an enormous Financial entity uh we hear today from the end wokeness account on X uh that first of all they control7 trillion doll in assets 7 trillion do they control in assets and their new class of interns has uh almost no white people in it and the employees are given courses on white fragility and engaging white males to advance Dei and they're also big backers of ESG so for uh for many decades I have uh uh very full-throated endorsed Vanguard funds because what the funds are is they're um they're unmanaged funds an index fund is just like a a basket of of stocks and a basket of stocks is a real good way to invest and they have reasonably low fees so the things you want are an honest company that can tell you don't invest in individual Stocks by this basket of stocks because divers diversification is good that's very good that's why I like Vanguard uh the people who had invested in Vanguard funds from the beginning of the fund would be really happy because their index funds did great that's the whole point so Vanguard is a very credible successful financial institution which I have very happily recommended lots of people for I don't know 30 years I've probably been recommending them at the top of my list for 30 years today I dis reccommend them as a racist organization and I don't believe that they should get any of your money and if you have any money in there and it doesn't cost you too much I would yank it down immediately because I don't think you can support this or you should it it leads to a bad place you don't want to be supportive of racist companies no matter which direction the racism goes so this is just pure racism and um I I get that they're trying to correct years of of U you know years of having too many white people and white men in positions I get that I know what they're trying to fix but don't do it this way th this is this is we can't do business with you if this is who you are so I absolutely dis reccommend Vanguard funds for anybody uh who cares about racism well it turns out that claan gay uh who was the president of Harvard that stepped down um there there are many movie offers multi-million dollar movie offers made about the situation uh Christopher rufo who was one of the primary people besides Bill Atman trying to get her to step down he asked uh who would play him in the movie so Christopher rufo is asking who would play him in the movie and uh an account called uh John Stokes made a suggestion it says my money's on Idris Ela I've been laughing about that all morning all right if you didn't know Idis Elba is a very good black actor who's going to be I I think that they've agreed to play James Bond is that deal been made or is that just something they're talking about I don't know the details but that was the discussion so now let me say again idra ELO is great and he could play a great James Bond I would definitely watch that movie so I don't have any problem with that uh that that's not where I'm gonna that's not the hill I'm going to die on I think a good actor can play you know whatever they want um so the fact he's a great actor should be the the key thing to understand from that but that's pretty funny get ID your s to play Christopher rufo well well in the less good uh story this also comes from n wokeness one of my new favorite accounts um fentanyl seizures at the border I'll give you a little history in 2020 they found uh almost 5 lbs of fenel at the border that they that's just what they found now five pounds of fenel do you know how much that is because like a little Trace can kill you five pounds that can kill a lot of people that was in 2020 in 2021 uh well it's a little more than five pounds in 2021 it was 11,200 lb up from five five would kill a city but uh at least it slowed down so in 2022 oh it didn't slow down it was 14,700 lb of fenel then now again that's only the parts they caught that doesn't count what got through just what they caught all right but thank God Joe Biden's uh talked to China so and Mexico so they could get that number down and I'm happy to report that for the year 2023 the number is oh 27,000 PB it takes 2 and half pounds of fentanyl to kill half a million people uh carry the three x times four that's enough to kill every single person in the United States good job Joe good job there's now enough Fel to kill every human being in the United States you know you know where we should start getting serious when there's enough to kill every pet to because people I don't care about them but if you you know if the pets start getting into it well we've got to draw the line there how in the world how in the world can Trump lose this election if it's a fair election he can't that's why it's not going to be a fair election I don't think there's a chance right who whoever is behind this is who's running the country would you agree who whoever is behind all this fentel comeing in is running the country at least in important ways because if the president were in charge there are lots of ways to stop it I mean well I don't even what else to say about it I mean this is so absurd at this point that I I don't get it anyway so um how about all that news about Ukraine huh you know I hate that I look on social media and I turn on the news and it's just Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine they just can't stop talking about it right now the news kind of stopped to say more news kind of stopped and how about Gaza how about those latest casualty figures from Gaza right uh did the news stop the news stopped right so we got two major Wars and three three three Wars four if you count the Border yeah and the News decided oh you know what's interesting Iowa it's really cold in Iowa how about those UFOs hey look at the UFOs well here's a uh there's now a story that there are leaked German plans for World War II no not causing World War II that I'm going to throw you a like a little uh surprise the news is reporting that Germany is preparing to wait for this fight against World War II yeah they'd actually be on our side this time apparently they'd be on our side so that's good news uh the the worry is that Russia if they wrap things up in Ukraine they feel emboldened by it because they got some property that they would start going after the baltics uh let's see what's there that you got your Estonia your lvia and your Lithuania now Joe Biden probably thinks Lithuania is where we get our lithium so maybe we do but that would be a weird coincidence I don't I don't think we get any lithium from Lithuania but it would be funny if we did anyway uh um so it turns out there are a number of Russian Nationals in Estonia lvia and Lithuania I don't know I feel like we should just let Russia have all the Russians speaking people and just just say can you just take all the Russians will you leave us alone if you have all the Russians because that's making a little too easy for him because I feel like he can win all the Russians but if he tries to take over Poland well now I got a bigger problem because honestly I'm not super concerned about the borders of Lithuania I know I should be um I will say that uh if they if they with Estonia they're going to run into a problem the the the estonians uh well there there's a a friend of mine lives in Estonia and they don't want to piss him off because if they do they're going to piss me off and then I'm all in on Estonia so um don't mess with Estonia you should leave that one alone if pu Putin are you listening Putin I figure he probably watches my show trying to learn English Putin uh I don't know about Lithuania and lva but you better keep your hands off Estonia better keep your head off of that one that that's going to be a different game so that's just a warning for you anyway um as Germany said when these leaked plans came out so the plans involve an assumption that Putin keeps going and keeps conquering stuff and then what what would they do about it um but as the German military quite reasonably and rationally says um we play for everything and that should have been the story so they shouldn't have had to ask the German general hey is this what you plan to do no we plan for everything that's what we do we just make sure we've considered every possibility this is one of the possibilities so we plan for it so I'm not sure that this means they think it's going to happen it just means it would be very smart to have a contingency plan so they're just being smart are you kidding me there is a lithium battery energy storage Park in Lithuania come on come on come on it's that's actually true lith lithium battery storage facility of Lithuania there had to be all right well I think we should trick uh Putin into attacking elbonia because if we can get uh Putin to put all of his resources into elbonia well then they wouldn't exist because elbonia doesn't exist so that's my plan all right ladies and gentlemen there was so much news today I don't think I even saw it all was there any big story I forgot to mention I feel like there's something big I'm forgetting to mention I I did hear on uh MSNBC that the experts are saying they don't necessarily think that any of uh Trump's trials will have an outcome before the election and they're real worried about that because if the outcome is after the election then I suppose he pardons himself or or the country ignores it or something buy a blonde wig everybody wants me to wear a Joy Reed uh wig oh sword of truth sounds like sort of yeah that yeah that's a problem uh comment says Bill Amman is not anti woke he wanted Claudine gay because she's not Jewish says you uh now five of eight Ivy League schools have Jewish presidents and the problem with that is what's your problem with that yeah see the problem is what are we supposed to do tell the uh Jewish population of America to stop over uh like over succeeding what do you want to do about that is anybody claiming they got their job because they're Jewish if you can claim that then we have something to talk about if they didn't get their job because they're Jewish then you don't have anything to talk about it just means that one group of Americans is excelling would you want them not to be in the country would you would you want the Jewish Americans who are qualified enough to be running major ivy league institutions will you want them to go to some other country they're like insanely great assets of the country and you're you're bitching about them doing too well that's like saying V is too smart so there's something suspicious going on I I think we need to let accept exceptionalism from individuals and maybe get over it yeah just get over it individuals can Excel of any any type doesn't matter who they are tuer is uh having having on the uh uh what do you call the surgeon Surgeon General I think of Florida a black gentleman who according to most Republicans his view is that the uh the the vaccines were horribly dangerous so most of you would say he's doing a great job he's a black man who excelled is saying what you want him to say better than the rest according to Republicans probably would say that so why can't people just do well like what's the problem if somebody who doesn't look like you does great why do they propagate so much anti- whiteness well I don't think the Jews are doing it are they you think that well yeah I mean if they are it's because they're College presidents it's not because they're Jewish yeah no I don't think that has to do with Jewish that has everything to do with Democrats if if it's something that's common to every single Democrat and the Democrats are super diverse how how are you picking one group out you you I think you have some self-reflection to do there do a little self-reflection on that all right what else we have going on UFO grifters what would how many of you would say it now seems obvious that the UFO thing is nothing but a planned distraction how many of you would say that that's fair to say uh so let me call out a comment that I see a lot uh this comment says Scott has a blind spot for the quote chosen people Epstein shows you how success is achieved really so Epstein is an example of all Jews you just you you that's the only thing I can say to that is just you really that doesn't work with anybody there's nobody there's nobody who's your example of all the people you you hard all right um that's all I have to say about that all right ladies and gentlemen that's enough for you on You.
Tube and Rumble and X thanks for joining and we'll have more fun tomorrow make sure you come back
[Music]
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human civilization it's
called coffee with Scott Adams I'm
pretty sure you've never had a better
time and today we've got the Iowa
results and all kinds of stuff you're
going to love it you're G to love
it and if you'd like to take this
experience up to levels that only Iowa
could understand all you for that is a
copper marar glass a tankered Chalin a
canteen Jugger flask a vessel of any
kind fill it with your favorite
liquid I like coffee and join me now for
the unparallel pleasure of the dopamine
of the day the thing that makes
everything better is called the
simultaneous Sip and it happens now
go that's so good so good what while you
still have your beverage would you join
me in a toast to V
ramaswami for in my opinion the best
campaign ever anybody ever read uh
honestly the best campaign I've ever
seen he was
Flawless he was Flawless in battle and
he was Flawless in defeat and he appears
to be so far Flawless in his after
defeat although is it a defeat is it a
defeat or is it a step up to
2028 anyway uh thanks for the great work
the uh contribution to the thought the
uh just showing us how it can be done
just showing the the right way to do
everything really so to you vake
sincerely appreciate
it but you know there was a another
winner last night
we're going to talk about
it but first while while you're all
pouring in here to watch this exciting
live live stream and of course we're
mostly going to be talking about Iowa
and what's going on there but I thought
I'd give you a little pallet
cleanser how would you like to find a
way to destroy the world economic forum
and the Davos meeting do you think I can
do
it you ready
all right here's a little news
story it's all you need to know to
destroy the world economic
Forum um this is reported on X by Mario
nul who says uh that this year's wef
meeting at Davos appears to be heading
in the usual direction of a drug fueled
Bunga Bunga sex
party local escort service website
officially announced all local service
providers are completely booked during
the wef
week and sometimes in both holes they
didn't say that but it feels like they
should have
um the wef's 2024 theme is quote
rebuilding
[Laughter]
trust all
right how would you like to end the
WF here here's how you do
it
[Music]
a lot of you guys have
spouses uh have your spouses uh ever
heard of a description of your business
meeting if your spouse is going to an
international business meeting which can
be accurately
described as a quote drug fueled Bunga
Bunga sex
party maybe you're not going next year
Jamie Diamond
maybe you're not going next
year I'm not wrong that's all it would
take to end the WF all you have to do is
tell their spouses what's going
on because even if the you know their
their particular spouse they're pretty
sure they're not
involved do you still want to have to
explain why your husband's over there so
where's your husband he uh he's he's on
a trip really a trip say that's sounds
interesting where's he going he he just
overseas a little bit no what' you say
over overse what's the name of the place
he's going
to what I can't hear you Davos
Davos where have I heard that before
isn't that where the world economic
Forum goes to have their drug fueled
bonga bonga
parties yes but your husband's not
involved in any of that
right I don't think
so so if you want to take care of that
there's your
path well as you know Trump had a solid
victory in the Iowa
caucuses and uh broke some records he
got uh 51% rounding off it's the highest
in the history of the Iowa Republican
caucus excluding the non-comp itive
years the non-competitive years when
he's not running against anybody in his
own party Trump got 51% he won every
County in
Iowa
so that's not
bad how'd you do I was all right I won
every County in Iowa every
County now do you think this scared the
uh people in MSNBC and CNN little bit
we'll talk about that yeah so let's see
uh what else happened so Dan santis got
21 I'm rounding off everything here D
santis 21% Haley
19 and V eight so v um has conceded and
he uh he says he did not achieve his
stated goal of surprising on the upside
in fact it was as if he had not even
campaigned honestly so the bad news is
that doing an amazing campaign doesn't
make any difference in Iowa I mean no
difference at all apparently they' made
up their minds so yeah it doesn't
doesn't matter the quality of your
campaign as MSNBC has pointed out uh and
I will point out as well it's kind of
interesting that the iio results were in
the exact order of
whiteness now I'm not going to say
that's why the Iowans picked who they
did because there are lots of variables
here but it did come out in the exact
order of how white they are if you know
what I mean so I'm not sure that race
isn't any part of
this you know if we're going to be
honest there was probably a racial
Dimension and I think a lot of people
believed uh this is what I heard a lot
of people believe that uh V was a
Muslim
no I i' never even heard that but you
know the people get confused with Hindu
and Muslim and you know not everybody's
fully versed in in world religions so I
think that worried him I I think they
were worried that you know maybe he
wasn't as Christian as they are um and I
think that I think that might have been
a small part of the uh the equation
unfortunately but um but I think even
more a bigger part of the equation is
they just love Trump can we agree on
that I don't think it was a rejection of
dtis it was not a rejection of Haley and
it was not a rejection of aake it's just
they really really really like Trump
they really like him a lot and they want
the revenge and they want their safety
and they want their fighter who's going
to put it all on the line so I do not I
do not begrudge them their choice
whatsoever I think the f people of Iowa
um chose well good job Iowa good job
Iowa uh they have however found a way to
throw a match on the biggest pile of
gasoline we've ever seen in our
lifetimes so things are going to get
real interesting but I'm here for
it well so f f says he's suspending his
campaign is that the same thing as
ending a
campaign is suspending a campaign just
simply what people always say you know
just in
case uh there might be some legal
technicalities to why you say it that
way
but I don't think we can
ignore that the election is a long way
away and Trump has a whole bunch of
risks so I do think that the reason that
DeSantis and Nikki Haley are still in
the race is because they'd like to just
hang around a little bit longer to be
the backup mergency
spare now V by immediately um ending his
campaign by the way was that the perfect
time to end
it can you agree with me that the way V
played it was
perfect it was
perfect it was the exact situation it
was the exact time to do it waiting
would have been a bad look very bad look
do it right away do it decisively do it
clearly and
cleanly uh tell you know say what you're
going to do which he did he's going to
he's going to help uh Trump and perfect
I I could not be happier uh sharing
sharing a country with
vake with with that kind of
performance but uh here's the thing that
I don't think anybody has quite figured
out
yet do you think the Democrats have
figured out that they just weaponize
vake
V talking on behalf of V is pretty
powerful
stuff do you know what they just did
they just combined the two strongest
forces possibly in the history of the
Republican Party the strongest force of
nature with the smartest politician
we've ever
seen and they're on the same side
completely did they see that coming I
don't think people see this
coming I I I think the what the thing
that V can add is he'll go on the show
that won't invite
Trump you see the danger here because
the CNN's in the msnbc's are could to be
hungry for Content but they can't really
invite
Trump and they don't like to you know
they don't like to bring his lying
pundits on because they don't like lying
pundits according to them you know what
they determin to be a lie but you know
what V doesn't do he doesn't
lie V has found a way to tell the
Republican narrative without the need
for any lies because there was never a
need for any lies it was it was never
necessary he was just the one smart
enough to figure out it wasn't necessary
to lie you could you could do the whole
story with any lies right the hyperbole
you know certainly helps when you're
persuading but you don't need it it was
wasn't essential he showed you that so
this allows a way for the Trump type
message which I I would argue I I'm
going to agree with Trump it's not his
message he's he's basically trying to
capture you know the
American core feeling and you know and
try to uh expand it I
guess but you put vake on
MSNBC that's going to be fun stuff and I
don't think they cannot invite him
because they can't say he's lying am I
right have you ever heard them say
that has NS NBC or CNN ever accused him
of lying they have
not and now they've established that the
reason for not letting Trump on we'll
talk about that in a minute is that they
they don't want to show his
lies what are you going to say about
the yeah they got a lot ofir time to
fill I think the's going to be
busy in my view the only cure for Trump
is a
vake he's the only cure for
TDS because he can give it to you the
way that won't make you flip out when
you hear
it this really changes everything this
changes everything and I don't know that
the that the Democrats see what's coming
yet cuz I don't think it I don't think
anybody in the Democrat Party has really
followed V I mean a lot of Republicans
didn't which is part of the
problem they have no idea what's coming
and this is going to be fun all right uh
and how did Trump take it when VI
gracefully uh conceited he immediately
truthed back uh thank you vake a great
honor did anybody did anybody have any
concern that they wouldn't be good
friends when this was over I mean at
least in terms of being on the same side
no do you know why because that's what
they are Trump is a fighter and then
when you join his side you're done
fighting that's it there's no grudge now
you're done fighting now we move on and
they're both that person now they're
done fighting so good for them that's
that's how to show
it uh Adam townend who was backing v um
had this comment today he said uh if you
didn't learn something about yourself
from watching V these past few weeks I
don't know what to tell
you
yeah uh and then he says something I
learned that there's a whole new level
to engaging uh people with strongly
differing
viewpoints V showed you that it is
actually possible to talk to people with
wildly different
viewpoints and as small as that sounds
it's every everything it's everything
it's it's the part that was missing and
it's because the news has made it almost
impossible to just tell the truth and
get away with it but he he showed you
how to do it it's just this is just
really the even losing is one of the
best thing that's happened to America
it's it's kind of a weird irony all
right let's talk about Nikki
Hy so she uh she came in uh third
place and a little bit after DeSantis
and then so her summary is tonight Iowa
made the Republican primary a two-person
race hold on so this is Trump um
DeSantis there's got the Nikki Haley was
so I don't know you know what who could
help her with the
math V yeah v he's pretty good at math
he could help her with that
yeah no uh uh you you f you came in
third you came in third all right but
kidding aside joking aside her point if
I if I understand it correctly uh let's
see if I understand her point would be
that DeSantis is too much of a trump
light so disantis and Trump you could
almost think of as like one person so
she's the alternative and now she's you
know strong second
which is not a bad point I mean maybe
she could set it set it better but uh I
I see Mike cernovich who had been
backing disantis early but then switched
to the who's wondering why DeSantis has
not
announced but in desantis's favor I
don't know that you could finish second
and drop out can you in a four-person
race because you know where do where do
V's votes go I guess you wait till you
find now right I mean if he picked up
something from V maybe gets a little
closer in New Hampshire maybe maybe
Nikki H is going to take New Hampshire
and then that makes D Santa seem a
little less relevant but I agree with uh
I agree with Mike covich that why
DeSantis hangs on needs to be
explained because it looks suspicious
right right now there could be a
legitimate reason that he's just staying
around to make sure that there's a
backup plan he thinks he's the backup
plan America would be better off if
there is a backup plan because I think
we can all just say it directly there
has to be a backup plan right we we
could just say that out loud now right
there has to be a backup plan because
the the Democrats have made it very
clear that the level of a threat they're
putting on candidate Trump is something
we've never seen before before this
won't be like other things so yeah and
and having V inside the uh Trump
tent uh who I call the sword of
truth I'm hoping that catches on V
ramaswami the sword of
truth uh I don't want you I don't think
I don't think the Democrats want to have
a strong DeSantis a strong
V uh just waiting around you know for
the word in case it comes the Scimitar
of Truth damn you that's better sorry
we're we're doing we're redoing it it's
now the Scimitar of Truth although
that is is Scimitar more of a Arabian
word yeah citar maybe we go back to
sword we we'll American we'll
americanize it yeah we better we'll go
back to sword sword of
truth although to be fair is simp SAR is
an excellent word just doesn't fit
here all right
um anyway Nikki Hy saying that uh her
third place finish makes it a two race
probably works for young people because
they can't do math either so she's got
that working for um Glenn Greenwald says
this H the massive in historic size of
Trump's Victory should lead to some
self-reflection about what caused the
complete collapse of faith in the
legitimacy of us institutions of
authority and Justice whereby voters so
easily disregard four felony cases as
irrelevant if not an
asset well Glenn uh so I almost always
agree with Glenn greenwald's takes but
not this
time Glenn there isn't going to be any
self-reflection where have you been
now I I know it's more of a hopeful
thing he's not he's not predicting
there'll be self-reflection which would
be crazy you more it was more of a gosh
I hope hope we get some but we're not
going to get any self-reflection because
the problem was never uh that the data
or the arguments were wrong it was never
that this is a medical problem you can't
you can't fix a medical problem by
self-reflection oh I've got some cancer
but a little self-reflection ought to
take care of it no it's a wrong tool
self-reflection will not help you with
TDS this is full-blown Mass hysteria a
mass hysteria is a mental health problem
like really you know no hyperbole it's a
mental health emergency I would say and
you can't fix it with better data better
data doesn't doesn't help doesn't help
anybody Health you'd have to literally
deprogram and the funny thing is that
the people who are most worried don't
realize that they are the
problem they're actually the ones
creating the mental health problem but
they don't know it that they think that
they're victims of something and not the
perpetrators so if you can't tell the
difference between the victim and the
perpetrator is very unlikely that you're
going to be working on some kind of a
solution
now how crazy are things well let me
tell you how crazy things are so crazy
in the full out Massy
areia The Joy Reed msnbc's you know one
of her one of the biggest
anti-trumpers uh is literally
wearing a trump a trump uh
wig to say that Trump is a bad person
right she's literally dressing like him
now I was thinking I would like to get
one of these Trump
wigs so that every time Trump wins
another
primary you could wear it the next day
like the next morning I'll just be
wearing my trump wig to talk about you
know New
Hampshire I'm not wrong you tell me
that's a coincidence you tell me that
that's a coincidence that is not a
coincidence now did she plan it no did
whoever did her hair
were they thinking I'm going to make you
look like Trump no no but it's not a
coincidence right that this is a picture
of the sort of uh the mass hysteria
going
physical this is somebody who's so Trump
is so in her head that he's on her
head God I like that so much I'm going
to say it twice pretend you didn't see
it the first time get
ready Trump is so far in her head that
he's on her
head wasn't that better the second time
much better the second
time all right well that's
happening so Glenn uh you're a superstar
Glenn Greenwald but uh no I wouldn't be
waiting for the self-reflection to
handle
it all right well um CNN and MSNBC if
you didn't watch
the coverage from either of those
networks you miss the best show you miss
the best show because watching the TDS
coverage of trump destroying the uh the
field in
Iowa it was really
fun because I do watch it like it's a a
mental health show like it's just people
just acting out with suffering I don't
really see it as news or anything even
in that sort of General category is pure
entertainment watching people suffering
who kind of deserve
it
um because God do they deserve it all
right so what happened was MSNBC last
night when Trump got on to do his
victory speech they decided to uh not
show it and Rachel mad M said uh that uh
she explained why NBC and other
mainstream networks are not to show it
uh because
um they say the caucus goers believe the
lies but you know they don't want to
they don't want to be basically playing
his
lies that's right the
news is going to decide that there was
this one candidate who
lies uh let me let me check the record
um let's see the political record of
every candidate in the history of the
United States looking let's see uh
AI can you tell me I'm doing my research
doing my research huh well there's an
awkward problem here it turns out that
100% of all candidates lied except for
vake who's an of the race so so how do
we handle that so I guess
MSNBC has gone to the ultimate level of
censoring they're going to tell you
who's lying and then not let you see
them and they call that the
news how does MSNBC survive the uh the
political season because they've gone so
far into the ridiculous I mean they're
just a farce at this point it's just
ridiculous I I feel like in the past
they did a good job of pretending they
were like news when they clearly weren't
but now they they stop pretending
they're just going to give up on all the
pretending and they're just going to say
we can't talk to you about the other
side because we don't want you to know
what they're thinking but and again this
is the problem that vake might slice
through because he can he can break
through
that all right uh Jake Tapper said uh
that they would talk over Trump because
uh as he said you could hear him uh
repeating his anti-immigrant
rhetoric his anti-immigrant rhetor
anti-immigrant
H I wonder where else we say things are
you know like
anti when when do you say you're Pro
something and when do you say you're
anti something because I I thought Trump
was pro- Law and Order pro-american
legal citizens I didn't realize he was
anti something oh he's against something
that's a funny way to say it so he's
really really for American
and the way you'd say that is he's
anti-immigrant
I don't believe that he's ever called
himself anti-immigrant I believe he's
anti- crime I believe he's anti-
unenforced borders I believe he's anti
chaos at the border with enormous
terrorism
risks and Jake Tapper who is anything
but a real newsers says that's
anti-immigrant
well I also don't like the way you talks
about immigrants so I would agree with
him that his choice of words not optimal
and that's something V can get right but
uh no he's not anti-immigrant to say
he's anti-immigrant is just crazy
ship all right
um of course there'll be lots of
discussions about whether 2020 was a
stolen election that will never go away
um but
um Laura lumer is reporting that uh uh
CNN said that ahead of the uh Iowa cauas
there was Iowa caucus there was a poll
do you think Biden legitimately won in
2020 and CNN was forced to
report on CNN's OWN Network that when
ped Ian said by a majority of
68% no
68% have been watching their
coverage for five years and just said
[Laughter]
nope
68% now that's just in
Iowa and that's probably just the
Republicans because it's the Iowa caucus
so I mean that's high for uh anything
but uh not as high if you consider that
it's Republicans going to a
caucus all right um but here's my
recommendation um I believe it is not
the high ground and you need The High
Ground it is not The High Ground to say
the 2020 election was stolen that's not
The High Ground here's The High
Ground uh we have a system that is
designed so you can't
tell that's The High Ground
if you want to sound crazy say you know
it was fixed and you can't prove it well
then you look like crazy doesn't mean
you're wrong doesn't mean you're wrong
but you would look crazy if you claim
with certainty that it was rigged and
then somebody says all right show your
evidence you go ah ah but some things
are
Brewing right so it doesn't really work
as an
argument except on your own side
basically but here's the argument that
can work it's
designed designed by intention so that
you can't tell if it was riged or not
now that's the argument you want to get
the other side into that it's designed
so you can't tell who won do you want
some evidence of that now you're saying
to me but Scott you're getting yourself
right back into another situation where
you don't have any evidence for your
claim don't I don't
I well let's see if there's any uh
recent
news um yes uh was it uh Virginia just
found that there were thousands and
thousands of votes that were not counted
now it turns out that if they had been
counted it would have been good for
Trump no it would have been good for
Biden Trump actually got
overcounted that there were actually in
Virginia there were like 4,000 too many
votes for Trump
now it's 2024
and we just
learned that the account in Virginia was
off by thousands of
votes so the very least we could say for
sure is that you can't tell if your
result is accurate within thousands of
votes for five
years that's a fact right they could not
tell in Virginia if they had an accurate
count for 5 years and then when they
found out found out they didn't now
8,000 votes wasn't much you know the the
margin was like 450,000 votes but the
point is about the system the point is
not any specific outcome the point is if
you believe that anybody could look at
our election and
know it was it was safe that's not a
thing there is no there's nothing built
into the system that is a
safeguard to tell you that you'd even
count counted all the votes just think
about this there's nothing about the
system that tells you when you're done
counting that you have counted all the
votes just think about that that
problem the the most basic thing did you
count all the votes we don't have a
mechanism to know
[Laughter]
that yeah or or did you undercount the
votes or did you count them wrong we
have no mechanism to know any of that so
to imagine that the real question is
that a a certain election was rigged
you're in the weeds you're in the weeds
and there's no place to go except
talking to your own side which is good
but it's not going to convince the
others if you want to convince the other
team you say you realize that we're
still finding votes five years later
which proves they didn't know that they
were lost when the election was
certified
which proves we don't have a system that
can even tell you if we got all the
votes and counted
them that's pretty basic pretty basic do
you think that the people who do all
paper
ballots don't have a way to know that
all the pieces of paper that were put in
the Box were counted yeah they do
there's somebody who watches it you put
it in the box and then there's a bunch
of people who watch you count it more
than once
yes in other places they absolutely know
that every person who came in with a
piece of paper that was a vote was
actually counted but we can't we don't
have that
system all right um and of course Joe
Biden came out with his divisive Mega
extremist statement so Biden said looks
like Donald Trump uh just won Iowa he's
a clear front runner blah blah but
here's the thing this election was
always going to be uh you and me versus
the extreme magga
Republicans can you tell us who the
extreme Maga Republicans are Joe Biden I
think the news needs to ask him for
names because if you can't name them
you're talking about the
voters are you not if he's talking about
Steven Miller being too close to Trump
say it say his name and then we will
decide
if that's a reasonable statement you
know do we think uh you know this this
person or that person is too extreme
well honestly I thought Steven Miller
was a little bit extreme in
2016 he's not extreme
now he's definitely not extreme
now because his his his immigration
policies are the exact ones we need
which are to completely reverse all the
way back to where it was when Trump was
first in office
so can you name the extremists and then
if you can name the extremists can you
name the extreme
policy was the extreme policy the one
that uh treated our borders like every
other country that is our Ally well I
guess they're not doing so well in
Europe but you know you know the point
it is the
extremist just securing your border is
that it is is it uh moving is it that
the Supreme Court moves the abortion
question closer to the people into the
states is that the extremism letting the
people have more say
locally what exactly was the extremism
is it they don't like his tax policies
is that
extreme you somebody needs to nail down
the people saying that they're magga
extremists and say can you be more
specific either give us their names or
if what you're saying is it's like all
the people in the movement
just say it say what you mean tell us
the truth for
once all right um in my in my view that
might be one of the worst messages I've
ever heard in the history of the
Republic because there are not many
examples where the leader of your
country stands in front of you and says
the problem with our country is this
group of
you do you know who does that China and
the Wagers right so basically Joe Biden
is trying to treat the magga people like
the
Wagers and that's
okay yeah yeah I don't want to use the
HW because it's too overused so I'll go
with China and the Wagers just for
now yeah basically wants to treat them
like a some kind of
Despicable
minority well one thing that is clear
let me give you the theme for the coming
months Democrats will continue to look
at
people and Republicans will continue to
look at
policy and every time you see it remind
yourself that it's happening because
only one of them is legitimate if you're
talking about policy you're in the right
conversation even if your policy is
wrong but if you're saying the real
problem is Extreme Mega Republicans what
did you say about the policy it's about
the people you're basically saying hate
these people I've never seen anybody
promote hate of of the population when
you're trying to be the leader of it
except Hiller of
course and of course China with the
Wagers so I think we should just call
Joe Biden a racist every time he says
something about Maggie extremists and
anything about Dei and anything about
ESG CRT and all those other racist
things I I think Biden just has to be
called it racist because to to imagine
it's anything else is just crazy I mean
you might be a
brainwashed uh blackmailed racist but
still the same
effect all right uh here's a little
Hunter Biden update just for fun
remember where Hunter was going to have
an art gallery but don't worry that he's
laundering any money or selling favors
because he won't even know who bought
the art and there'll be like a a wall
between the art gallery and any politics
well none of that was
true the the art gallery guy says that
Hunter would routinely ask him the names
of the buyers and you tell them and that
Hunter is the only person who made art
who asked for the names of the
buyers the regular artists that this
Gallery handles sell the artist work but
they don't tell them the name of the
buyer because that would be sort of a
privacy issue now is there anything to
worry about about the buyers oh yeah the
buyers are exactly who you thought they
would be they are in fact big Democrat
donors and people who want uh Democrat
favors and got them it's exactly what it
looked
like and it gets better the art gallery
guy has talked to president President
Biden not Hunter President Biden
twice once in the White House at some
event he chatted with the president and
once President Biden called The Art
Gallery guy uh personally to say some
congratulations or something that his
daughter did so no Joe Biden did not say
to the art gallery guy hey good work uh
helping my son launder money but when
the president of the United States calls
you at work
that has an that has an
impact that has an effect yeah so it was
exactly it's exactly what you thought it
was the art gallery was exactly what the
only question I have is whether Hunter
is actually making the
paintings now I have I have conflicting
evidence of
that uh one is I've never seen in paint
except the one where he was like blowing
something through a straw where normally
he's you snorting it a straw and so
anybody could you know blow through a
straw so that wasn't really an example
of art I want to see him actually make
one of those paintings that are
impressive because the artwork is
actually very good I want to see him
make one of those but I have
heard through indirect means that he
actually does stand in front of an easel
and does actually
paint so maybe I'm wrong which would be
fun I I would love to know that Hunter
Biden was a world class artist I would
love to know that that that would be
just fun I'd be completely supportive of
his Artistic Endeavors although the
money laundering is still obviously an
issue but I don't know if he makes these
paintings or not I'm just kind of
curious one way or the
other all right
um um CBS news says according to our
entrance poll most Iowa GOP caucus goers
I love that word you don't see it much
you don't get to use that the rest of
the year I'm going to say caucus goer as
often as possible today hey you caucus
goers or you caucus Growers all right
but anyway according to CB CBS News um
there six in 10
people uh who were Iowa caucus goers the
GOP types 6 and 10 said they would vote
for Trump even if he's convicted of a
crime what do the anti Trump people say
when they say when they find out that 6
out of 10 Republicans will vote for him
even if he's convicted of a crime it's a
cult it's a personality cult they must
not read the news they don't know the
facts right is there any
hypothesis that CBS News and the others
are leaving
out could there be any other
explanation for why why why would so
many Republicans be willing to ignore an
actual felony conviction I can't think
of anything can you think of
anything oh wait I've got something I
just thought of
it and I posted this back to to CBS I
said that um maybe it's because most
Iowa GOP caucus goers know the Democrat
driven lawfare against Trump is
and so they plan to shove that
down the throats of the media
liars and watch them choke and die on
it that maybe
maybe
possible am I am I anywhere near the ZIP
code am I getting close yeah no yes no
that's what it is in case you're
confused CBS let me say it again
maybe like every one of the other
Republicans
they think the lawfare is they
think it's media driven and they want to
shove it down your throats and
watch you choke on it that's what I
want that's what I want I want to watch
Trump shove it down their
throats and watch them choke on it no
real violence you know in case you're
confused no no real violence hyp we're
talking in the figurative sense sh shove
the down their
throats so that's the game I'm
in that's the game I'll be playing they
shove it down their throats
game um let's see how many ways do you
think the uh pro Democrat news will find
to describe dementia without calling it
dementia well here's the latest entry
from AOS who is as you know not really a
legitimate new source more like a
Democrat you know organ at this point
um they report in a post lots of
highlevel Democrats are warning that
President Biden and his re-election team
are too complacent and unimaginative
about the threat of losing to Donald
Trump
huh they're complacent and they're
unimaginative what would be
another word for that let's say you're
really old you're the president you're
very very old your brain's not working
like it used to and indeed you can see
little differences and maybe you're not
as vigorous and uh active you know maybe
you're a little
more
complacent and what if your brain isn't
so good anymore that it could think of
you know new and original ways to do
things what what would that be called Al
the unimaginative unimag what kind of a
brain would be complacent and
unimaginative well I can't think of a
thing dementia
Hiller uh we've got a new uh standard
for uh disinformation or we
should the WF was talking about the the
big old risk of disinformation in the
every the the news is telling us about
the risk of disinformation and lots of
important people are telling us about
the the risk of
disinformation I have a a standard which
I would like to um
promote a standard for what is
disinformation and what is not you ready
you're going to like it because if we
just say hey I think this is true what
does the other side say no it's not and
then the other side says but this is
true and then what does the other side
say no it's not so that's our current
system how's that working out for
everybody no it's not it's not working
out at all
so I propose the following standard
misinformation and disinformation I I'll
put them together the Mis
disinformation is defined as any point
of view which will not tolerate somebody
sitting next to you debating it
politely let that sink in
misinformation is any information uh
that is presented without the
Counterpoint and I mean a legitimate
Counterpoint a polite person who's not
talking over you who's simply sitting
there and presenting the other side and
of course you would have you would have
the chance to speak back it's always
disinformation if you're seeing one side
so when the wef officials I just saw a
video were up there complain about
disinformation they were
disinformation because there should have
been somebody sitting right next to them
saying it's not disinformation it's a
different opinion you just think it's
wrong now if that person had been
sitting there showing the Counterpoint I
would say well there's some information
for me there there's a person who has
this point of view there's another
person who has another point of view I
can compare them that's called
information what's it called if only one
of them is on the stage
disinformation every time it might be
true sometimes but that would be like a
weird situation no one person talking
without the benefit of a Counterpoint is
disinformation by definition right
because everybody's lying in
politics except for
vake right if it's not vake or you know
Thomas Massie you know maybe you can add
you know Paul you know Rand Paul and a
few others but basically if it's if it's
somebody in the news or a pundit or
somebody running for office
usually usually it's not true in some
way so I would use the same standard
whether it's a Republican or a Democrat
if it's one person talking of course
it's
disinformation now if it's one person
giving a campaign
speech we all kind of put that in cont
context don't we aren't we all grown up
enough to know one politician giving a
speech is not supposed to look like
complete truth I think we all know that
right you have to hear the other side
but when somebody's let's say in a news
capacity let's say you're Joy
read and you're just giving one side of
things that's disinformation by its
nature you don't even need to know the
details of what she said if she's giving
one point of view and they're exists a
Counterpoint or a context that's missing
that's all you need to know yeah it's
just information if there's only one
person talking what do you think that
should be your standard that this whole
thing about one person talking might be
true and might be false that's absurd in
politics one person talking is just
every time right now like I
said you could point out you know some
weird exceptions but there's a reason
reason that a came in
fourth if he lied better he probably
would have done a lot better imagine if
a had
lied he probably could have done a lot
better yeah but he just wasn't willing
to go
there all right
um NPR
uh NPR was according to fiser King
64 uh NPR is talking today about the
path forward for Nikki
Hy NPR is still talking about Nikki
getting in there the path forward is
that something terrible happens to
Trump you can can we stop talking about
the path
forward because I'm pretty sure it's a
path backwards if you know what I mean
she might have a path backwards into the
presidency but it's only if something
terrible happens to the leading
candidate so no NPR we don't treat you
as a legitimate news
source speaking of illegitimate things
are you following the story of one of
Trump's
um was she uh District attornies uh
fonnie you know fonnie f n n
funny what's her last name I forgot to
write it down Willis funny Willis so it
turns out she was having an affair with
the prosecutor who was handling the
Trump prosecution Now by
itself H that bother me too much
honestly I didn't really want to make a
thing about that because people have
affairs people who go to work in an
office sometimes they hook up and I
thought well that doesn't
necessarily mean there's something wrong
with this
process
however yeah which one of them was
married was it the guy who was married
or was he he was yeah he got divorced
just recently but but um yeah allegedly
right allegedly allegedly had a fair
um so but here's the part that'll get
under your skin I think it turns out
that the boyfriend she gave the job to
is nowhere near qualified for the job he
he had never been involved in anything
like this at this scale and for some
reason that we don't understand it was
necessary for him to spend like two days
at the White House talking the Democrats
and billing for it so it doesn't look
like he's legitimate it looks like she
was giving her boyfriend some free money
uh which makes her look like she is uh
corrupt now separate from the question
of whether she's corrupt when it comes
to charging Trump she's clearly corrupt
because she's doing this thing with her
boyfriend and sending him money now you
could say to yourself but Scott we don't
know that there's any corruption we just
know it's a boyfriend he's not quite
capable and she's sending him a lot of
money through allowing him this
possibility this uh this uh
opportunity yeah we don't know we don't
no
no but in these situations the
appearance of
impropriety is the same as the
impropriety would you agree they for all
practical purposes
is
um the the appearance of
impropriety is a is a you got to recuse
yourself
situation
so yeah yeah uh they went on vacations
together yeah so everything about it is
uh corrupt sounding and sketchy I don't
know that any of it was illegal I don't
know that anybody's um alleging that but
yeah there's a lack of transparency see
here there's something very much to be
concerned about and it's as sketchy as
hell and what is her response to being
caught red-handed in this sketchy
situation well it's probably racism she
says probably
racism
surprise
um and according to
rasmuson 50% of those they pulled
believe uh the allegations against uh
funny the district
attorney um they believe the allegations
basically and they they think that she
had an improper relationship again
that's not
illegal but ethically it's a bottom of
the barrel so the most unethical
unethical DA got busted for that anyway
all right let's talk about uh bill akman
as you know bill akman was successful in
getting the uh president of Harvard to
step down and you know he's anti- Dei
now so he's uh always voted Democrat but
he was very anti- Dei when he found out
what that was all about in Harvard so
now he's educated about that and he says
that uh if you haven't figured it out
already it is now abundantly clear that
Trump is going to crush Biden in the
election now that does seem abundantly
clear if Trump makes it all the way to
election day I don't think it's
abundantly clear that he's going to make
it to election day you know we could
just say that out loud now because I do
think the bad guys are that bad I don't
know it'll happen I'm not predicting
it'll happen but they are that bad yeah
we're we do live in that world and we
need to grow up a little
bit but Bill Amman decides he's going to
back uh the Challenger or I guess the
main Challenger you could say to uh to
Biden uh which is Dean
Phillips uh however it is an awkward
discovery that Dean Phillips has on his
website a pro Dei
statement so the anti- Dei guy is
decided to back the pro Dei guy for
president now people of course pointed
that out
hey um hey Bill Amman we like what you
did there in Harvard but um do you know
you're backing a pro Dei candidate what
does Bill akman say who is no quitter by
the way he's not a quitter he says uh
that Phillips didn't understand Dei and
that he expects that statement will be
changed soon because they're educating
him about what Dei really
is so no problem yeah once he corrects
that little
imperfection then uh he'll have a a good
package to take
forward right because that's that's kind
of a small thing isn't it
little small thing no bill Amman it's
not a small thing that he was a
racist this week he's a racist this
week I'm not gonna vote for him next
week because he because he
edited his his web page no bill you got
to give up on this one um and by the way
I love Bill akman like huge fan I'm sure
it's not reciprocal so I'm not depending
on him liking me for him for me to like
what he's done I like what he's done
period he's a he's a patriot he's he's a
plus in terms of the stuff he's done
here I don't know what else he's done in
his life but uh everything I saw him do
I liked a
lot but this is my friendly advice you
can't back a guy who had a Dei statement
on his he's just a
racist or he's a racist enabler or worse
he didn't understand the the biggest
issue in the country and he's running
for president this is the biggest issue
this is the biggest
issue yeah if you think and and it
because this issue permeates all the
other issues it's why you're afraid to
fly it's why the cities are full of
immigrants it's why you know uh property
crime is high it's why our budget is
breaking it's it's Dei and Dean Phillips
didn't know that the core problem in the
United States was a problem no that's
not a small problem to correct that is
game over you're done if you
ever had that on your website you're
done so I know I do love that bill akman
is a fighter so he'll probably stay with
it but my my advice is to just uh cut
your
losses I don't know what he needs to do
instead because I mean he's not going to
back a republican it looks like but you
just can't back the guy who had a Dei
statement you just can't do that that
there's no place to work with
that so that was a hell of a bad
start um and now if Bill Amman would
like to uh you know stick with Dean
Phillips I have some further questions
for him to ask Hey Dean Phillips tell us
your view on climate
change
right what what do you think Bill
amman's going to say when he hears this
guy's view on climate change I don't
know what it is but he's a Democrat so
you do you think Bill Amman believes the
CL the climate change alarmist and wants
to get rid of fossil fuels as quickly as
possible there's no way the amman's
going to hear the actual arguments pro
and con and back the Democrat side
because we've seen him in action he's
too smart for that now keep in mind the
acman also didn't realize that Dei was a
talk xic Time Bomb right so as smart as
he is which is super smart that was a
little blind
spot does he believe that was his one
blind spot because I don't think
so I think he needs to know that climate
change is another blind spot even if
it's a real problem separate from the
conversation of what's real and what's
not the way it's the way it's presented
and the solutions that are presented get
rid of fossil fuel right away these are
not serious people and I can't believe
that a smart person once hearing all
arguments would still back somebody who
was on that side of it it's hard to
believe all right um How about if he uh
ask Dean Phillips what he thinks about
all the problem with the white
supremacists ask Dean Phillips if he
thinks there's a mega extremist problem
and give us their names just like Biden
see I think Bill Amman needs
to if he's going to be this influential
and he seems to be very influential I
feel like he owes it to the rest of us
to dig in a little bit
deeper just just dig in a little like
you did with Dei so you know I give I
give acman a full pass for correction
right so my my standard for judging
people I say this all the time it's not
that you got one wrong that's not the
problem getting one wrong is just normal
we all get stuff wrong but how do you
deal with it how how do you deal with
being wrong you know how how did vake
deal with uh not getting his prediction
right in Iowa honestly quickly
clearly and with
humility that's how you do
it all
right so yeah Dean Phillips has a lot to
explain um Vanguard the company the big
company that has lots of uh index funds
just an enormous Financial entity uh we
hear today from the end wokeness account
on X uh that first of all they control7
trillion doll in
assets 7 trillion do they control in
assets and their new class of interns
has uh almost no white people in
it and the employees are given courses
on white fragility and engaging white
males to advance
Dei and they're also big backers of
ESG so for uh for many decades I have uh
uh very full-throated endorsed Vanguard
funds because what the funds are is
they're um they're unmanaged funds an
index fund is just like a a basket of of
stocks and a basket of stocks is a real
good way to invest and they have
reasonably low fees so the things you
want are an honest company that can tell
you don't invest in individual Stocks by
this basket of stocks because divers
diversification is good that's very good
that's why I like Vanguard uh the people
who had invested in Vanguard funds from
the beginning of the fund would be
really happy because their index funds
did great that's the whole point so
Vanguard is a very
credible successful financial
institution which I have very happily
recommended lots of people for I don't
know 30 years I've probably been
recommending them at the top of my list
for 30 years today I dis reccommend them
as a racist organization and I don't
believe that they should get any of your
money and if you have any money in there
and it doesn't cost you too much I would
yank it down immediately because I don't
think you can support this or you should
it it leads to a bad place you don't
want to be supportive of racist
companies no matter which direction the
racism goes so this is just pure
racism and um I I get that they're
trying to correct years of of U you know
years of having too many white people
and white men in positions I get that I
know what they're trying to fix but
don't do it this way th this is this is
we can't do business with you if this is
who you are so I absolutely dis
reccommend Vanguard funds for anybody uh
who cares about racism
well it turns out that claan gay uh who
was the president of Harvard that
stepped down um there there are many
movie offers multi-million dollar movie
offers made about the
situation uh Christopher rufo who was
one of the primary people besides Bill
Atman trying to get her to step down he
asked uh who would play him in the
movie so Christopher rufo is asking who
would play him in the
movie and uh an account called uh John
Stokes made a suggestion it says my
money's on Idris
Ela I've been laughing about that all
morning all right if you didn't know
Idis Elba is a very good black actor
who's going to be I I think that they've
agreed to play James Bond is that deal
been made or is that just something
they're talking about I don't know the
details but that was the discussion so
now let me say again idra ELO is great
and he could play a great James Bond I
would definitely watch that movie so I
don't have any problem with that uh that
that's not where I'm gonna that's not
the hill I'm going to die on I think a
good actor can play you know whatever
they want um so the fact he's a great
actor should be the the key thing to
understand from that but that's pretty
funny get ID your s to play Christopher
rufo well well in the less good uh
story this also comes from n wokeness
one of my new favorite accounts um
fentanyl seizures at the border I'll
give you a little history in 2020 they
found uh almost 5 lbs of fenel at the
border that they that's just what they
found
now five pounds of fenel do you know how
much that is because like a little Trace
can kill you five pounds that can kill a
lot of people that was in
2020 in 2021 uh well it's a little more
than five pounds in 2021 it was 11,200
lb up from
five five would kill a
city but uh at least it slowed down so
in 2022 oh it didn't slow down it was
14,700 lb of fenel then now again that's
only the parts they caught that doesn't
count what got through just what they
caught all right but thank God Joe
Biden's uh talked to China so and Mexico
so they could get that number down and
I'm happy to report that for the year
2023 the number
is oh 27,000 PB
it takes 2 and half pounds of fentanyl
to kill half a million people uh carry
the three x times four that's enough to
kill every single person in the
United States good job Joe good job
there's now enough Fel to kill every
human being in the United States you
know you know where we should start
getting
serious when there's enough to kill
every pet to because people I don't care
about them but if you you know if the
pets start getting into it well we've
got to draw the line there how in the
world how in the world can Trump lose
this election if it's a fair
election he
can't that's why it's not going to be a
fair election I don't think there's a
chance right who whoever is behind
this is who's running the country would
you agree who whoever is behind all this
fentel comeing in is running the country
at least in important ways because if
the president were in
charge there are lots of ways to stop it
I
mean well I don't even what else to say
about it I mean this is so absurd at
this point that I I don't get it
anyway
[Music]
so
um how about all that news about Ukraine
huh you know I hate that I look on
social media and I turn on the news and
it's just Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine they
just can't stop talking about it right
now the news kind of
stopped to say more news kind of stopped
and how about Gaza how about those
latest casualty figures from Gaza
right uh did the news stop
the news stopped right so we got two
major
Wars and three three three Wars four if
you count the
Border yeah and the News decided oh you
know what's interesting Iowa it's really
cold in Iowa how about those UFOs hey
look at the
UFOs well here's a uh there's now a
story that there are leaked German plans
for World War II no not causing World
War II that I'm going to throw you a
like a little uh
surprise the news is reporting that
Germany is preparing to wait for
this fight against World War II yeah
they'd actually be on our side this time
apparently they'd be on our side so
that's good news uh the the worry is
that Russia if they wrap things up in
Ukraine they feel emboldened by it
because they got some property that they
would start going after the
baltics uh let's see what's there that
you got your Estonia your lvia and your
Lithuania now Joe Biden probably thinks
Lithuania is where we get our lithium
so maybe we do but that would be a weird
coincidence I don't I don't think we get
any lithium from
Lithuania but it would be funny if we
did anyway uh um so it turns out there
are a number of Russian Nationals in
Estonia lvia and
Lithuania I don't know I feel like we
should just let Russia have all the
Russians speaking people and just just
say can you just take all the
Russians will you leave us alone if you
have all the
Russians because that's making a little
too easy for him because I feel like he
can win all the
Russians
but if he tries to take over Poland well
now I got a bigger problem because
honestly I'm not super concerned about
the borders of Lithuania I know I should
be um I will say that uh if they if they
with Estonia they're going to run
into a
problem the the the
estonians
uh well there there's a a friend of mine
lives in
Estonia and they don't want to piss him
off because if they do they're going to
piss me off and then I'm all in on
Estonia so
um don't mess with Estonia you should
leave that one alone if pu Putin are you
listening Putin I figure he probably
watches my
show trying to learn
English
Putin uh I don't know about Lithuania
and
lva but you better keep your hands off
Estonia
better keep your head off of that one
that that's going to be a different game
so that's just a warning for
you anyway um as Germany said when these
leaked plans came out so the plans
involve an assumption that Putin keeps
going and keeps conquering stuff and
then what what would they do about it um
but as the German military quite
reasonably and rationally says um we
play for
everything and that should have been the
story so they shouldn't have had to ask
the German general hey is this what you
plan to do no we plan for everything
that's what we do we just make sure
we've considered every possibility this
is one of the possibilities so we plan
for it so I'm not sure that this means
they think it's going to happen it just
means it would be very smart to have a
contingency plan so they're just being
smart are you kidding me there is a
lithium battery energy storage Park in
Lithuania come on come
on come
on it's that's actually
true lith lithium battery storage
facility of Lithuania there had to
be all right well I think we should
trick uh Putin into attacking
elbonia because if we can get uh Putin
to put all of his resources into elbonia
well then they wouldn't exist because
elbonia doesn't exist so that's my plan
all right ladies and gentlemen there was
so much news today I don't think I even
saw it all was there any big story I
forgot to mention I feel like there's
something big I'm forgetting to
mention I I did hear on uh MSNBC that
the experts are saying they don't
necessarily think that any of uh Trump's
trials will have an outcome before the
election and they're real worried about
that
because if the outcome is after the
election then I suppose he pardons
himself or or the country ignores it or
something buy a blonde wig everybody
wants me to wear a Joy Reed uh
wig oh sword of truth sounds like sort
of yeah that yeah that's a
problem uh comment says Bill Amman is
not anti woke he wanted Claudine gay
because she's not Jewish says you uh now
five of eight Ivy League schools have
Jewish
presidents and the problem with that is
what's your problem with
that yeah see the problem is what are we
supposed to do tell the uh Jewish
population of America to stop over uh
like over
succeeding what do you want to do about
that is anybody claiming they got their
job because they're
Jewish if you can claim that then we
have something to talk about if they
didn't get their job because they're
Jewish then you don't have anything to
talk about it just means that one group
of Americans is excelling would you want
them not to be in the
country would you would you want the
Jewish Americans who are qualified
enough to be running major ivy league
institutions will you want them to go to
some other country
they're like insanely great assets of
the country and you're you're bitching
about them doing too well that's like
saying V is too smart so there's
something suspicious going on I I think
we need to let accept exceptionalism
from individuals and maybe get over it
yeah just get over it individuals can
Excel of any any type doesn't matter who
they are
tuer is uh having having on the uh uh
what do you call the surgeon Surgeon
General I think of Florida a black
gentleman who according to most
Republicans his view is that the uh the
the vaccines were horribly dangerous so
most of you would say he's doing a great
job he's a black man who excelled is
saying what you want him to say better
than the rest according to Republicans
probably would say that so why can't
people just do well like what's the
problem if somebody who doesn't look
like you does
great why do they propagate so much
anti- whiteness well I don't think the
Jews are doing it are they you think
that well yeah I mean if they are it's
because they're College presidents it's
not because they're
Jewish
yeah no I don't think that has to do
with Jewish that has everything to do
with
Democrats if if it's something that's
common to every single Democrat and the
Democrats are super
diverse how how are you picking one
group out you you I think you have some
self-reflection to do there do a little
self-reflection on
that all right what else we have going
on UFO grifters what would how many of
you would say it now seems obvious that
the UFO thing is nothing but a planned
distraction how many of you would say
that that's fair to
say uh so let me call out a comment that
I see a lot uh this comment says Scott
has a blind spot for the quote chosen
people Epstein shows you how success is
achieved really so Epstein is an example
of all
Jews
you just
you you that's the only thing I can
say to that is just you really that
doesn't work with anybody there's nobody
there's nobody who's your example of all
the people
you you
hard all right
um that's all I have to say about that
all right ladies and gentlemen that's
enough for you on YouTube and Rumble and
X thanks for joining and we'll have more
fun tomorrow make sure you come
back