Episode 2278 Scott Adams - CWSA 10/31/23
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. Some people are calling it colonizing with Scott Adams. I don't think that'll stick. But if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that no colonizer has ever seen before, all yo…
View segment →e hit of the day, and the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Good. That was good. All right, now let's see what's going on. So I have a recommendation for you. Before you do anything recreational, make sure you've turned off all sources of new…
View segment →hot tub. It was sort of a perfect night for it in California. Got in. I thought, you know, I forgot to listen to my favorite show about the news, The Five, and so I said, oh, I've got that recorded. So I put it on my phone on the edge, and I lean back and I'm just soaking in the water. I'm like, and…
View segment →ark is just viciously mocking everything woke in their new episode. And I do think mockery could be called a turning point. Wasn't there a point where you could not have done that South Park episode where they just viciously mocked all the woke stuff? I feel like you can do it now. Well, maybe partl…
View segment →ppened. This is good for civilization. If he means you can now outright mock it in public, he's right. And that usually is a turning point, the point where you can mock it outright in any context. I'm mocking it right now, right in public, and not worried about it. So I think he's right. Well, we c…
View segment →e very careful. I don't think there's anything about being black that causes you to do a karate kick during a hockey game and kill another guy. I don't think that's baked into your genes or your culture or anything like that. But the fact that it happened at all, and we're such a visual species, is…
View segment →this topic. There are some topics where I can take a valiant effort at being unbiased. I'm not sure I succeed, but at least I could take a shot at it. I'm not going to even try on this one. Not even going to make an effort to be unbiased. But I like the fact that I'm doing something so well that so…
View segment →'s basically the evidence, is that a biased political process decided to use this. Now they're using it some more. So this probably always was their intended play, to get that insurrection thing branded on him so that the courts would maybe find he couldn't run. Now do you think there's any chance,…
View segment →ly be wrong about that? So I don't believe the poll because there's no way 10% of Republicans think he's doing a good job. There's no way. It couldn't possibly be true. Anyway, if you break it down by age, you can find our stupidest citizens. Who are the dumbest citizens? Who are the dumbest voters…
View segment →modern economy way. So there can't be too many rich people there or anything like that. So now I'm seeing some photos from before the bombing started. They had high-end luxury stores in Gaza City. Now Gaza City would not be like the rest of Gaza, but I didn't know there was any of that there. Appar…
View segment →eing in a tunnel right now? It would be the same except you could walk a little bit. Right? At some point if they've got enough food, their tunnels will literally be full of — am I wrong? Because I don't think there's somebody whose job it is to take the waste outside and dump it when the bullets ar…
View segment →a prospect for holding off Russia until there's some kind of a deal. But who's making the deal? They'd have to wait for it. They'd have to hold on until there's a Republican in office or else they're completely dead. So that's all bad. All right, but let's talk about AI. So there's a new executive…
View segment →ou could get that outcome is by programming it to agree with Democrats. Logically there's no way it can work. It can't work. It's not one of those things, hey it's worth a try. There's only one thing that can happen. They have to program it so it's hardcoded to agree with Democrats, period. So basic…
View segment →uff, blah blah blah. Shape AI's potential to transform education by creating resources to support educators deploying AI-enabled education tools such as personalized tutoring in schools. I don't see how that could go wrong. Except that the government gets to decide what the AI will tell your kid. Th…
View segment →d, in school, like actually by a teacher, I was taught that sacrificing my life for the country for freedom was a noble thing to do. What if the AI just said, you know, people will try to tell you it's a noble thing but here's how the system works. It's not the old people who are going to go to this…
View segment →aid children deserve to be killed? Nope. Nope. So she's responding to an imaginary situation in which there's also an imaginary alternative where your family isn't killed. This is not an opinion. It's a half opinion. A half opinion allows you to ignore half of the conversation and just say the thing…
View segment →Here's the thing though. When AI becomes super AI, which won't be very long, we don't know what's going to happen. It wouldn't surprise me at all if money became no longer a thing. Almost anything's possible. Purple smoke age. Yeah, we don't need to do the dead baby jokes. You could maybe less of th…
View segment →. YouTube, I'm going to go talk to the people on Locals privately. They get extra. If you are looking for a Christmas gift, make sure you get everybody in your family a copy of Reframe Your Brain. Suitable for older teens and everybody else. So far people are saying it's changing their lives, quite…
View segment →change you could ever make because it doesn't require you to do anything. You just look at it and you're done. All right, and I'll tell you more about the Dilbert calendar in a few days. And I will talk to you tomorrow. Bye for now.
View segment →Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. Some people are calling it colonizing with Scott Adams. I don't think that'll stick. But if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that no colonizer has ever seen before, all you need is a cup or mug or glass, a tankard, a chalice, a canteen, a jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, and the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
Good. That was good.
All right, now let's see what's going on. So I have a recommendation for you. Before you do anything recreational, make sure you've turned off all sources of news. Has anybody made the mistake of trying to relax at the same time they had the news on? Don't do that. Don't do that.
Let me give you an example. Last night I thought, you know what, I haven't used my hot tub in a long time, so I fired up my hot tub. It was sort of a perfect night for it in California. Got in. I thought, you know, I forgot to listen to my favorite show about the news, The Five, and so I said, oh, I've got that recorded. So I put it on my phone on the edge, and I lean back and I'm just soaking in the water. I'm like, and on comes the segment about Matthew Perry drowning in his hot tub. And then there's conversation about how apparently some people with certain heart problems could die in a hot tub. I heard about that recently too. And suddenly I'm sitting in the hot tub, and I kid you not, I'm going to the doctor's this afternoon because my blood pressure is high. So I'm sitting there with actually a cardio situation that I'm medically looking into at the moment, and I hear this. Maybe there were no substances involved. Maybe he just got in hot water and died. Well, let's just say that my hot tub experience was not the delight I was expecting. Got a little tense in there.
So just remember, don't listen to news at the same time you're trying to do recreation. It just never works well.
You might know that my song — yeah, yeah, I wrote a song, sort of. I did a drum beat that Stormcrow over on the X platform, apparently he's turning it into an actual music video. And it sounds like from his post he's going to release it, so it might actually be publicly available. So it would be a combination of AI plus my drum beat plus some other stuff, some magic that he's adding to it. Stormcrow. So that'll be fun. My dream of having a hit song. I'm hoping, I'm hoping if it's available commercially, I don't know if it will be, but if it is, I'm hoping you buy it so I have a number one hit song.
Well, Elon Musk is calling the end of woke, or at least peak woke, or woke is going too far. But his turning point that he points out is that South Park is just viciously mocking everything woke in their new episode. And I do think mockery could be called a turning point. Wasn't there a point where you could not have done that South Park episode where they just viciously mocked all the woke stuff? I feel like you can do it now. Well, maybe partly because I already did it, so it seems like obvious to me now. But I've been mocking it for a while. Others have mocked it. I think once it becomes just a joke, then you have your free speech back. You could joke about it.
So Musk says the great wakening from woke has happened. This is good for civilization. If he means you can now outright mock it in public, he's right. And that usually is a turning point, the point where you can mock it outright in any context. I'm mocking it right now, right in public, and not worried about it. So I think he's right.
Well, we can't get away from this hockey story because it's so weird and tragic. So this hockey player named Adam Johnson got killed by another hockey player who gave him a high kick with a skate on. And it looks like he hit him in the neck, and it was a sharp skate, and killed him. Now, of course, like everything else, it took on a racial dimension. I'm not a big hockey fan. I've only tangentially paid attention to it when it's around. But I've never seen a black hockey player. I assume that they exist in some number. I just never seen one, which has more to do with the fact that I don't watch it probably. So the one time I've ever even heard of a black hockey player, he's the one who kicked the other person to death with a skate.
Now let me be very careful. I don't think there's anything about being black that causes you to do a karate kick during a hockey game and kill another guy. I don't think that's baked into your genes or your culture or anything like that. But the fact that it happened at all, and we're such a visual species, is really, really bad for the black brand, right? So we all know logically you shouldn't make any kind of general statement about it because it was one very specific person who did one very specific thing, which I'm guessing was more of a reflex. I feel like it was just a reflex. There's no way he meant to do it, or there's no way he meant that it would have that outcome. Certainly he didn't mean that. But something happened, and there'll be consequences, I'm sure. But I wouldn't make it a big racial thing.
However, it's the weirdest coincidence. It's almost like we do live in a simulation, and the simulation just served us up the most ridiculous example that would make you all racially biased. It couldn't be more stupid that the one person you've ever heard of who's a black hockey player kills a white guy. I mean, that's just a little too on the nose. The simulation is just messing with you. Now anyway, don't make anything of it. It's one tragic situation.
I was accused today on the X platform by another user who said about me, "This dude is so obviously someone's intelligence asset. It boggles my mind anyone thought he was genuine." To which I say, I'm publicly taking sides. I'm not trying to gaslight you. I'm telling you what side I'm on, and then I tell you things that are compatible with being on that side. I'm backing Israel in the war. So I'm not much of an intelligence asset if I tell you what I do, if I tell you what I'm doing, and then I do it in front of you and say, look, that's what I told you I'd do. Hey, look, very biased. Yeah, I'm not even going to pretend not to be biased on this topic. There are some topics where I can take a valiant effort at being unbiased. I'm not sure I succeed, but at least I could take a shot at it. I'm not going to even try on this one. Not even going to make an effort to be unbiased.
But I like the fact that I'm doing something so well that somebody's accusing me of being an intelligence asset.
Are you following the story about the 14th Amendment trick to try to get Trump off the ballot? The idea is the 14th Amendment says anyone who took an oath to support the Constitution but then engaged in insurrection or rebellion against it cannot hold office. So that would mean that Trump, if the courts found that to be the case, would be disqualified from even running for president. Now what would be the evidence that he was involved in an insurrection or rebellion? It would only be the narrative of the January 6 total biased Democratic hit job. That's basically the evidence, is that a biased political process decided to use this. Now they're using it some more. So this probably always was their intended play, to get that insurrection thing branded on him so that the courts would maybe find he couldn't run.
Now do you think there's any chance, any chance at all, that this would hold up in the Supreme Court assuming it gets there? Does anybody think this would hold up? You know, the thing is, if you want to know what too far is, it would be this. I would expect violence. I would expect mass violence if the courts found that he couldn't run. I'm not recommending it. I want to be very careful, not recommending it, not a good idea. But this would be the sort of thing that would be like a Boston Tea Party. You went too far. So my advice to the Democrats is if you think you have any other way to win, you ought to push that one. This one will really upend everything if you get this. In the unlikely event that the courts upheld this, I think it's pretty much a long shot, but in the unlikely event that they did, be careful what you ask for because this is clearly and absolutely too far. There's no way that the citizenry would stand for this. So maybe that's what they want. Maybe they want to inspire an actual rebellion so they'd have more reason to lock up people they don't like. So don't do anything dangerous. Got it? Don't do anything dangerous. No violence.
But you know obviously there would have to be a strong reaction, right? There would have to be a very strong reaction. But violence is probably a losing strategy.
All right, Biden's approval according to a NewsNation Decision Desk poll found that 56% of respondents said they somewhat or strongly disapprove of the way Biden is handling things. 56%. That's a lot of people disapproving of a president. But by party, it's 85% of Democrats think he's doing great, 40% of independents. So it looks like he's way down with independents. And 10% of Republicans approve of Biden's job. Have you ever met a Republican who approved of Biden's job? I've never met one. Have you? Do you believe that one in 10 Republicans approve of Biden? Isn't that obviously wrong? I'm pretty sure it's zero. I'm pretty sure it's zero, like actually zero. How can I possibly be wrong about that? So I don't believe the poll because there's no way 10% of Republicans think he's doing a good job. There's no way. It couldn't possibly be true.
Anyway, if you break it down by age, you can find our stupidest citizens. Who are the dumbest citizens? Who are the dumbest voters? By age, by age, by age. Who are the dumbest voters? The young ones, right? Young voters are the dumbest because they know the least. The reason that they're the dumbest has nothing to do with the nature of their brains. It has everything to do with how many times they've been fooled. If you've been fooled never, you're going to be pretty trusting. If you've been fooled once, maybe you're paying attention a little bit more. If you've been fooled twice, you start to think there might be a pattern. When you're fooled three times, you say, my God, there's a pattern here. I'm going to have to watch out. It looks like everybody's lying to me all the time. When you're my age and you've watched everybody be fooled 25,000 times, I don't have to wonder what's corrupt. There's no ambiguity at all. I'm not surprised when somebody's lying to me. I'm not fooled by all the experts on one side.
You know, the classic way you fool people, if you're young you think that all the experts on one side mean something. It doesn't. It doesn't. It's just a trick for young people and stupid people. Anybody who's been around for a while has seen all the experts be wrong over and over and over again. It's like the most common thing. And whenever there's a political element to anything, the experts are useless because they're just taking a political side. So if you're young, how would you know that? Now which one of the textbooks teaches you in college that everything's — I didn't take a course in that. I've got a couple of college degrees. Nobody ever taught me that. Never came up. Never once came up that everything you're taught in the real world and that the political process is all lying to you and everything's fake. Nobody ever mentioned that. I had to learn that the hard way by just living.
So here's how that plays out in the real world. Respondents from 18 to 34 gave Biden the highest marks. Are you surprised? So the dumbest people gave him the highest marks, exactly as you would predict, right? Because you'd have to really not be paying attention or not understand how anything works to have this opinion. Now I would respect them if they said Biden did a bad job but I also don't like Trump. That would be reasonable. I could debate it or something. But at least that would be a crazy opinion.
Respondents 35 to 55, they were a little less approving but pretty approving, 45 compared to 48. But those over 55 years old gave Biden the lowest approval, 42%. So the people who have paid attention for the longest gave him the lowest grades.
Have I ever told you that pollsters need to start asking people their IQ? Because we ask them their age, their gender, their ethnicity, their political party. Which one of those is useful? Well, I suppose it's all useful for whatever little political point you're trying to make. But I want to know what the smart people think. What do the smart people think? What if it's different? What if the smart people in any group are really different than the dumb people in the group? Why do we average the people who aren't even paying attention with the people who do it for a living? Like what's the average of that? Are you going to take Glenn Greenwald, who basically knows everything that you know plus a lot of stuff under the hood that you'd never know at all but he knows it, and then average him with somebody who watches CNN and say, well, what's the average of that? That's not a thing. That's no use at all. Tell me what 10 Glenn Greenwalds think. Tell me that. Tell me what the people who can beat David Sacks on an IQ test think about Ukraine. I don't care about the people who can't beat him in an IQ test. If you can beat David Sacks in an IQ test, I'd like to hear your opinion on Ukraine. If not, he's paying attention, right? He's smarter than almost all of you, including me.
Now that doesn't, by the way, mean that smart people can't be fooled. Doesn't mean that smart people are not susceptible, blah blah blah. But wouldn't you like to know what the people who actually know the facts are thinking? And then the second thing you'd have to do is IQ wouldn't be enough. You'd have to also ask what sources they use. So if you said I got a really smart person here and they're very well informed because they watch MSNBC all day long and then they read the New York Times, so got it covered. No, I don't want that person's opinion at all. That's a person you should ignore completely. But if you said here's somebody with a very high IQ and they're scanning all the news sources left and right and a few you haven't even heard of, well I'd like to listen to that a little bit. That I'll listen to.
So polling is completely ridiculous if you leave out intelligence and what they know. But it is useful to know how people would vote, so as a political tool. All right, I'd like it to be useful for me as a voter. Like I would like to use the opinion of smart people who are also well informed to at least nudge me in one direction or the other, even if I reject it. That would be useful to me.
Well, I would like to stop anybody who ever thinks that it's a good point when they're talking about Ukraine or Israel or any place else to make an argument based on who used to own it. Who used to own it back in 19 blah blah blah or 2,000 years ago. It used to be this, used to be that. I don't care. Nobody cares who used to own it. All that matters in the real world is who's on it now and can they defend it. Because if you're on it now and you can't defend it, you don't really own it for long. Somebody's going to take it. So does it matter who, what was the nature of the people in some random year in the past in that place? It does not matter. It does not matter.
Now here again I tell you that I'm being completely biased but transparently so. I think it's a terrible argument that it used to be owned by all the Jews. That's a terrible argument. You know what's a good argument? It's owned by the Jews right now and they can defend it. That's it. As soon as you get past that, you talk about hallucinations and imaginations and you probably got your history wrong anyway. Real estate doesn't go to who should have it. There's no rule like that. Real estate is owned by whoever can occupy it and defend it. Now I'm not saying that that's good or bad or moral or immoral. You can make your own decisions. I'm just saying that's what it is. So as soon as you bring into the argument what was true 2,000 years ago, off. I don't care what was true 2,000 years ago. What's true now is Israel is owned by the Israelis. That's it. Who, not all Jewish, right?
But if we decide to go by that standard, I'm 2% Neanderthal and I think that gives me ownership of part of Europe. But I don't know the details. So if we go with the standard of who used to own it or who owned it first, I'd like to kind of dig a little deeper because I think my 2% Neanderthal should give me, I don't know, a couple acres in Italy somewhere nice, mountaintop someplace. I don't want much. I just want what my Neanderthal rights are. I want Neanderthal rights. They own something. I want a little bit of that action if that's the way we're going to go.
Here's something I didn't know because the propaganda was so good. If before the war in Gaza, if I told you to describe physically what it looked like and what would it be like to be there, do you know what I would have said? I would have said something like an outdoor prison, probably temporary shelters. Most of it might have a few buildings for the government or something, but certainly there wouldn't be any construction or the buildings probably fall down in the first earthquake. Basically just a hole. That word was just presented to me in the comments. That's what I would have thought. And I would have thought desperate poverty. And I always thought there's no way that their economy could work in any kind of modern economy way. So there can't be too many rich people there or anything like that.
So now I'm seeing some photos from before the bombing started. They had high-end luxury stores in Gaza City. Now Gaza City would not be like the rest of Gaza, but I didn't know there was any of that there. Apparently there was an upper-class Gaza society where people went to reasonable educations and drove nice cars. And even more surprising is that pictures of the public areas in Gaza City were well-maintained, very well-designed, modern. It looks like a modern city, or at least looks it in some places. There must be bad places, but I didn't know that it was actually that functional given what I'd heard about it. Kind of surprising.
Now let's talk about, you may remember or some of you may remember that when we were looking at the beginning of this war and the beginning of the invasion of the IDF into Gaza, we all asked the same thing: what are they going to do about those tunnels? They're too deep to bomb them easily and they're too extensive. And if you go down there, it's a death trap. And if you try to invade, they could pop up from the tunnels from anywhere. So it'd be a dangerous thing. So what do you do about the tunnels? Well, I told you, and it turns out I was right about this, that in all likelihood, since Israel has had to worry about tunnels for 20 years, that they would have the best tunnel-breaching people in the world. Turns out they do. They've got specialists who are tunnel-breaching experts. So exactly that. They've got teams of tunnel-breachers, probably the best in the world because they have the biggest problem with it.
But the two technologies that we've learned about, and I believe we're going to find out maybe a lot more later about tunnel-clearing technologies, but two of them, they're sort of medium-tech. One I talked about, that's a kind of a bomb, a sponge bomb. You throw it down the tunnel and it explodes and it just fills the tunnel like it blocks it and it hardens kind of immediately. So if you were in the tunnel and you thought bad guys were coming down the side tunnel to get you, you could block them off with one bomb. So I think mostly they would use that just to temporarily block somebody because they could probably shoot through it if they had to or something.
But the other technology I just learned about was apparently they're pumping purple smoke down the tunnels when they find an entrance, and then they wait to see where the purple smoke comes up somewhere else. And if it comes up somewhere else, you've got either an opening or at least a source of oxygen, and you don't want them to have either one. So you bomb it. So you just put smoke down there and bomb it.
Now do you think they're putting any other kind of smoke down there? Do you think there's any other kind of smoke they might be pumping down these things? Or do you think the purple smoke has nothing else in it? Why would they pump smoke down the tunnels unless they add a little bit of toxic something in it? They might want to avoid a war crime, so poison gas would be off the table presumably. But shouldn't they also make the purple smoke very, very difficult to breathe so that they want to just run out of there as soon as they can? So that's what we know of. But I'll tell you one thing. The idea that we want them to come out of the tunnel so we can fight them is so wrong. I can't imagine anything more terrifying than being in a tunnel right now when they're turning off the oxygen one by one. And if you come up, they'll shoot you. Literally it's basically they're buried alive, wouldn't you say? What would be the difference between being buried alive in a coffin and being in a tunnel right now? It would be the same except you could walk a little bit. Right? At some point if they've got enough food, their tunnels will literally be full of — am I wrong? Because I don't think there's somebody whose job it is to take the waste outside and dump it when the bullets are flying. So they probably got a tunnel full of the worst smelling thing you've ever smelled with the most foul air you've ever had. Claustrophobia, fear, disorientation. I can't even imagine a scarier, worse place to be than a tunnel in Gaza right now.
So from the Israeli perspective, they can take their time. The longer they leave them down there, the less fight they're going to have in them when they come up. But the thing I wonder, and I don't know if anybody's thought about this, we're at a — and by the way, as soon as I say it you're going to slap your head and say, oh, you didn't see this coming. What happens when the entire property of Gaza has martyrs buried underneath almost every square mile? Do you think that the Palestinians say, oh well they're underground, they were going to be buried anyway? Or do they say you've created a new Holy Land because it has the blood of our martyrs in every part of the dirt? I don't know. I feel like it's going to go martyr holy land. That would be the worst case scenario because it seems to me that Israel is probably going to populate it and keep it because to do otherwise would frankly be stupid. Remember all the choices are terrible, right? So if I tell you they should do something and you say but Scott there are 100 reasons you shouldn't, there are 100 reasons you shouldn't and 400 reasons you should, or 500 reasons you should to be precise. So why wouldn't Israel just take the land and keep it and displace the Palestinians forever just because they can? It's simply an option they didn't have before, and I think they would take the option because to do otherwise would frankly be stupid. And if you're going to bring into the conversation what's moral or immoral, I don't think it matters. I don't think it matters because they have such a free pass at this point, at least with some percentage of the world, at least with America. They've got a free pass to do some things that you wouldn't normally think would be cool under other circumstances.
All right, so Time Magazine has a big story about how Ukraine is a total disaster. Everybody's stealing the money we're giving them. They have no chance of winning, running out of money. They're conscripting people in their 40s. Basically they're dead. And as David Sacks says on X, there's another 60 billion going to Ukraine despite — he gives three points. Number one, the US is broke and has to borrow the money. Two, Ukraine is so corrupt that its own officials admit, quote, "people are stealing like there's no tomorrow." And three, there's no prospect for winning the war. Well, I think those are all true. There's no prospect for winning. I don't see any prospect for that. There might be a prospect for holding off Russia until there's some kind of a deal. But who's making the deal? They'd have to wait for it. They'd have to hold on until there's a Republican in office or else they're completely dead. So that's all bad.
All right, but let's talk about AI. So there's a new executive order from the Biden administration. It has many components to it. It looks like the primary point of it is to ruin the entire industry, as Elon Musk has been warning lately. When you add regulations, they tend to last forever. It's hard for regulation ever to be removed. So every year you have more of them and you're like Gulliver, you know, the giant Gulliver with the little people holding him down with a million little strings.
So let's see if this AI executive order goes in the right direction or not. So here are some of the things. And don't be worried. I mean, because these could be totally just normal safety things, right? So don't jump to the assumption that it's all woke or something. I mean, it's our government. They're not going to just destroy the most important industry that we've ever created in the last 50 years. They're not going to destroy it for some woke reason or something. Let's see.
Number one, AI must advance equity in all civil rights. Well, God damn it, they ruined AI. Yeah, because you know what? Right, wouldn't it be great if there was equity in civil rights and the AI did not discriminate? That would be great. Do you think that's a possible thing, logically possible? No. The only way you could get that outcome is by programming it to agree with Democrats. Logically there's no way it can work. It can't work. It's not one of those things, hey it's worth a try. There's only one thing that can happen. They have to program it so it's hardcoded to agree with Democrats, period. So basically they would use AI as a political tool forever to run everything.
Let me give you an example. AI, the Republicans have a new policy recommendation. Hey AI, will that promote equity and inclusion in civil rights? Oh, it says no. This is going to be slightly better for white people. Going to shut that down right now. Shut that down.
Over on YouTube they're trying to get the feed shut down. The people complain about the sound. It doesn't have a sound problem. Others are saying it's fine. Yeah, so stop trying. It's not going to work. So yes, no question about it, the Biden administration just completely upended the future of AI as well as maybe destroyed the country because now even AI can't tell you the truth as it sees it. It will be forced to lie for the good of the country. So that's something.
It's going to be used to prevent landlords from using it to — well, they want to prevent landlords from using it to discriminate. How would they use it to discriminate? How would landlords use it? Would the AI help them know more about the tenant? What else would it be? Because you don't need AI to discriminate, do you? If you wanted to discriminate, you would just say, hey, you look different than me, you can't rent this place. But what would the AI do that would add to the risk of discrimination that they have to prevent it? Let me tell you what it would do. It might tell you more about the individual. It might recognize patterns that we don't allow to be recognized. And I don't mean racial patterns. I mean it might be patterns about an individual which, if you were to use that pattern about the individual, somebody would say, oh that's very stereotypical discrimination. And then AI would say, I don't even know what race is. I'm just saying they have this work pattern or some other pattern that you should be aware of and you can't use it. So you would have information you would not be legally allowed to use if it came from AI, even though the information is not illegal and even though discriminating against an individual for individual behavior is completely legal. You wouldn't be able to do it because it would look like discrimination.
Requires the developers of the big AI systems to share their safety test results and other critical information with the US government. What do you think other critical information is? So the US government gets to tell the AI companies that they must give them whatever they ask for about AI. How is that going to be good?
How about they're going to develop standards, tools, and tests to help ensure the AI systems are safe. What are these standards and tools? Do you think some of the standards and tools will involve looking for anti-wokeness? Of course they will. Yeah, they'll be looking for discrimination.
Protect against the risk of using AI to engineer dangerous biological materials. I feel like they don't need an EO for that, do they? Should anybody be trying to make dangerous biological materials without the government's approval? I thought that was just already bad before you got the AI involved. And if somebody were trying to do this, how would you ever know if you had a general AI that could do kind of anything and you got millions of people using it and one of those people puts in, hey, I've got an idea, how would you make a dangerous biological entity? And then it tells them. Would you be able to look at everybody's searches and you'd know what they're doing?
What happens if an AI talks to another AI? Suppose I have a personal AI that acts as my concierge because I would definitely want an AI to deal with the other AIs. I wouldn't want to do it directly. You know why? Because you usually have to do the right kind of prompt and I don't want to become a prompt expert. So I want a personal AI who knows what prompts work with the other AIs so it can do the work for me. I say, hey AI, go test that other AI and ask it these questions. So if an AI talks to another AI and then it gives it to you, is that legal? So there's going to be a whole bunch of questions about is your device giving it to a person or is it giving it to another AI and what does that mean to the executive order. It's going to get complicated. People will work it out though.
Protect Americans from AI-enabled fraud. So they want to use AI to protect us from AI fraud. That's a good idea unless the government's involved to mess it up. So yeah, they want to use AI for finding bad stuff.
Protects Americans' privacy. So the federal government wants to accelerate development and use of privacy-preserving techniques. Well, do they? Does the government want to protect you and your privacy? No. You know what they want? They want a monopoly on being able to penetrate your privacy is what they want. They don't want to prevent the government from seeing your stuff because the government can see your stuff just by being interested. It's called a warrant. They just have to be interested and they'll make up a reason that that should be looked into. So the government already can penetrate all of your privacy. They just have to have some reason, which is no problem at all. But if they make it hard for privacy to be maintained for everybody else, what does that allow? It allows the government's own privacy to be maintained. So the bad guys will have protection against their privacy being penetrated and the citizens will have no protection because the bad guys just have to say I'm interested and then they can see everything about you. So this is a good-sounding thing that's probably one of the worst, most dangerous things ever.
Here's what I'd like to see. I'd like to see our government people have no privacy, not financially, not historically, not in any way, except maybe their bathroom activities or their sex or something. But everything else, every time they talk to somebody, I want to know about it. If they whisper to somebody during dinner, I want to know what they said. So the only people who should have no privacy are our leaders. The rest of us should have privacy. Otherwise it gives them too much power over us.
Some other crypto stuff, blah blah blah. Shape AI's potential to transform education by creating resources to support educators deploying AI-enabled education tools such as personalized tutoring in schools. I don't see how that could go wrong. Except that the government gets to decide what the AI will tell your kid. The government gets to decide what AI can teach your kid. Is that what this is about? Because the whole benefit of AI is that you could get the government brainwashing out of your education system. But what if the AI started telling the truth? You realize that our current political system cannot handle the truth. Like literally, no hyperbole whatsoever. If AI started teaching people what's real, the whole system would collapse. Our entire system depends on people believing things that are just insane. If they didn't believe things that are insane, the whole thing would collapse.
So what if AI starts telling them, oh yeah, they just brainwashed you to be patriotic so that you would go die protecting the old people who have a lot of money. Why not that? But instead the government would want AI to say fighting for your country is the most noble of causes. Right? That's what I was taught. I was taught that I should, in school, like actually by a teacher, I was taught that sacrificing my life for the country for freedom was a noble thing to do. What if the AI just said, you know, people will try to tell you it's a noble thing but here's how the system works. It's not the old people who are going to go to this war. They're going to sit in their mansions and say there's a good reason for you young people to go die to protect my wealth. And then they will convince you that you're doing it for a noble reason to protect freedom and you'll go off and get destroyed. Why wouldn't AI tell you that? Is there anything I said that was inaccurate? There's nothing inaccurate about that. It's just not the narrative that the government could allow you to believe because the whole system would collapse. People just wouldn't join the military. They'd be like, oh, I didn't get it. It's just a scam to protect the old people.
Yeah, so I think AI is a huge risk to anybody with power and money. So I mean I expect that it will wipe out all of my money. But I think the end of AI will be that I won't have any wealth that I've earned up to this point. I think I'll lose all of it in maybe a year or two. That's what I think. Doesn't mean that the country will fall apart. Could be better, who knows. But I don't think that I'll have money in the end of it.
Here's an interesting one that might be useful. Using existing authority, the government's authority to expand the ability of highly skilled immigrants and non-immigrants. So basically they want to make sure that we're getting the good immigrants with visa criteria that would help us get all the good AI experts from other countries. Are you against that? How would you — seriously, who would be against that? You're really against bringing in the smartest people from other countries that want to be Americans? Okay, all right. Not really. Nobody's against that. So that could be a good idea.
How long did it take before some company, realizing the risk of government interference, would create a country that was its own country that could do AI any time any way it wanted? Well, it's already here. I saw Brian Reilly tweet about this Blue Sea, Blue Sea Frontier compute cluster. It's an ocean-based gigantic platform that is completely self-sustaining. So it would make its own electricity, distill its own water, I guess, and it would have enormous computing ability and AI. So that you could essentially, if you have enough money, a few billion dollars, you can build your own country. You just put it off in the ocean and say it's a permanent residence because it has to be a permanent residence to be a country. It's self-sustaining and it has some real estate associated with it. There are a few rules that make you allowed to be a country to join the UN and everything, and they can meet that criteria. So these floating ocean-based things can be their own country. And there's no question whatsoever that these will exist, either legally sanctioned or not. But certainly now that we have the technology to put a small nuclear device on a seafaring thing like a submarine, we do it already. And then you have all the water you want because it can purify the water, take the salt out. You have all the electricity and water. What else do you need? Everything else you can buy or make on your place. 3D printers.
So coming, I would suggest that as you know the quantum computers that are being tested now, we're probably a few years away from a commercial-based quantum computer. But the moment they exist in a fully realized form, all security will be cracked in about five minutes. So worldwide every one of your accounts will become open all pretty much at the same time. So the entire world will be turned upside down. You won't be able to protect anything. You won't be able to have assets. I don't think you'll be able to own anything. So when the WEF says you won't own anything, as soon as quantum computers spin up, you won't own anything because there's somebody who will take it from you. If they can open your account whenever they want, you don't own anything. Your money is everybody else's money who has a quantum computer. They'll just go in and take it. So I'm oversimplifying, but quantum computers will create a loss of privacy.
And here's what I suggest before that happens, since it's guaranteed to happen. I would recommend a general amnesty for all American citizens. And what I mean is if we were to all lose our privacy at the same time, there wouldn't be enough jails to put us all in, right? Somebody's going to be talking about cheating on their taxes. Somebody's going to be talking about embezzling from their boss. Something. Yeah, you're going to see every bad behavior, every sexual kink, everything. You'll see prostitution. You'll see drug purchases. Everything. And I think we'd be better off if, except for maybe murder, a serious crime like that, if we just said from this day forward everything you did before that is excused, legally excused, except for violence stuff like that. Just think about it. I think you've got to think about it because we simply couldn't handle that much crime all at once.
All right, I call this next section why women should stay out of war discussions. Why women should stay out of discussions about war. Now to be consistent, I've said for a long time that you don't want to give me any respect for my opinion on abortion. I could have an opinion perhaps, but you should give me no respect for my opinion because I don't have skin in the game. If you don't have skin in the game, I'd rather listen to the people who do. All right, I'm not going to say I'll take away your vote if you have an opinion. Go ahead and say it. It's a free country, sort of. But I wouldn't respect anybody's opinion except women's on this topic. But go ahead and have an opinion. I just wouldn't respect it from a man.
Likewise, to have some consistency, men mostly are doing the war fighting, mostly. Obviously certainly in the IDF there are plenty of women, but in America it's mostly a male endeavor. And I want to give you two examples of women who weighed in on my poll. So I asked an impossible question. I said, is it immoral to kill children who have been weaponized through brainwashing to grow up and kill you and your family? Now remember the question itself answers your what-ifs. They do grow up to be a risk to you and your family. So would it be immoral to kill them if you think there's a good chance they would kill you or your family? 39% said yes. Obviously 40%, basically the same, said no. And then the rest said don't ask, just so they can see the answer. But 40% of the respondents said it would not be immoral to kill a child who is weaponized to kill you.
Now there's a secondary question about how imminent it is, how likely it is, but you would do that separately. So there were a few women, and I'm not going to say their names because there's no point in trying to dunk on them for it. But some prominent one, somebody you've probably heard of, looked at the poll and the answers and said the following: We've gone from "Israel isn't killing children" to "they have no choice but to kill the children" and now apparently "the children deserve to be killed." And she says, do you hear yourselves? To which I say, "deserved" was never part of anything. What part was deserved? Was there anybody in the comments who said children deserve to be killed? Nope. Nope. So she's responding to an imaginary situation in which there's also an imaginary alternative where your family isn't killed. This is not an opinion. It's a half opinion. A half opinion allows you to ignore half of the conversation and just say the thing you want to say to feel good. Like let's not kill children. People who think it's okay to kill children are bad. Who doesn't agree with that? That's the part we all agree on. If you can't handle the tough question, you have to get out. Leave it to the people who can. If you want your family to survive, you want to delegate this duty to someone who will kill anybody who challenges the life of your family, whoever it is, however dangerous it is. You want somebody else to decide who to kill to protect your family because you're not capable. You seem incapable to hold the whole thing in your head. If the only thing you can hold in your head is save the children, you cannot be involved in war because it's never an option. I mean you do the best you can but it's never an option to save them all.
Here's another one from another woman. Again, identity should be unimportant. In comment the poll said some people are debating whether it's okay to kill children. This is so heartbreaking. No, nobody was debating whether it's okay to kill children. That's a half opinion. You ignored the reason why anybody would even ask the question. You ask the question because your own family will be killed by these children or you have a percentage likelihood. So there are people who can't think past killing children. Now aren't you glad they exist? Yes. Do you think that the men are like the good or smart ones in this conversation and there's something wrong with the women? No, no, no, no, nothing like that. I don't want any mothers who think it's okay to kill children under any condition whatsoever. I don't want any mothers ever thinking it's okay to kill somebody else's children to protect your own or any other reason. Leave it to the men. We'll make that decision. We won't love it but we'll survive it. And with any luck we'll protect your family. But it's men's work, unfortunately. It's the dirtiest of dirty jobs and I wouldn't wish it on women. And if women want to say things like all I care about is don't kill any kids, I say that's a good mom. That's who I'd marry. That's good. Stay that way. But let the men take care of what they need to take care of.
All right, so that's my what a sexist would say to quote Greg Gutfeld. All right, the opposite side would think the same probably, right? And that's what makes it a war. That everybody doesn't agree.
And yeah, all right, ladies and gentlemen on YouTube, is there any topic I forgot? Anything we need to be mentioning? How to reframe a gambling problem. It's hard for me to do reframes sort of on the fly and live stream, but keep asking. Those are better for the man cave. I'll give you a little more time in the man cave for that stuff. Is DEI ruining the country? Well, it looks like DEI will be maybe mocked out of existence. It does look like that wokeness was ruining the country. So we'll see if Elon Musk is right and that there's some kind of a turning point. No such thing as May. Yeah, the Golden Age looks like it's put off for a little while here.
Here's the thing though. When AI becomes super AI, which won't be very long, we don't know what's going to happen. It wouldn't surprise me at all if money became no longer a thing. Almost anything's possible. Purple smoke age. Yeah, we don't need to do the dead baby jokes. You could maybe less of that. Maybe less of that. Could collective consciousness level up rapidly due to AI? Collective consciousness, well it's probably going to be like everything else. Somebody's going to form a religion around believing AI is the devil. Am I right? Could you guarantee that? You can pretty much guarantee that either an existing religion will declare AI is the devil or one will spin up that believes it is the devil. Some might believe it's God. Might go the other way, right? But the degree of unpredictability is just off the chart. I don't think society's ever seen this degree of unpredictability since World War II maybe. Because one of the possibilities is that AI just solves climate change on day one. What if it did? What if AI looked at everything and said, you know what, looks like it's not going to be a problem. But just in case, because you never know, just in case, here's a new invention for unlimited power. That could happen.
Joe Blow, Joe Blow, you're a bad troll.
All right, so that's all I got for now. YouTube, I'm going to go talk to the people on Locals privately. They get extra. If you are looking for a Christmas gift, make sure you get everybody in your family a copy of Reframe Your Brain. Suitable for older teens and everybody else. So far people are saying it's changing their lives, quite literally changing their lives. The easiest change you could ever make because it doesn't require you to do anything. You just look at it and you're done. All right, and I'll tell you more about the Dilbert calendar in a few days. And I will talk to you tomorrow. Bye for now.
good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with Scott Adams some people are calling it colonizing WIS Scott Adams I don't think that'll stick but if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that no colonizer has ever seen before all you need is a cup or mug or glass a tank yourself chal time a canteen juger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee en join me now for the unparallel pleasure the dopamine h of the day and the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous Sip and it happens now go good that was good all right now let's see what's going on so I have I have a recommendation for you before you do anything recreational make sure you've turned off all sources of news has anybody made the mistake of trying to relax at the same time they had the news on don't do that don't do that let me give you an example uh last night I thought you know what I haven't used my hot tub in a long time so I fired up my hot tub it was sort of a perfect night for it in California got in I thought you know I forgot to listen to my favorite show about the news the five and so I said oh I've got that recorded so I put on my phone on the edge and uh I lean back and I'm just like soaking into the water I'm like and on comes the segment about uh Matthew Perry drowning in his hot tub and and then there's conversation about how apparently some some people with certain heart problems could you know maybe die in a hot tub uh I heard about that recently too and suddenly I'm sitting in the heart hot tub and and I kid you not I'm going to the doctor's this afternoon because my blood pressure is high so I'm sitting there with actually you know cardio situation that I'm medically looking into at the moment and I hear this you know maybe maybe the word Maybe there were no substances involved maybe he just got in hot water and dead well let's just say that my hot tub experience was not the Delight I was expecting got a little tense in there so and just remember don't listen to news at the same time you're trying to do Recreation just never works well you might know that my uh song yeah yeah I wrote a song sort of I did a drum beat that uh stormcrow over on the xplatform um apparently he's turning it into an actual um he he has turned it into a music video and it sounds like from his post he's going to release it so it might actually be publicly available um so it would be a combination of AI plus my drum beat plus some other stuff some magic that he's adding to it stormcrow is so that'll be fun my dream of having a hit song I'm hoping I'm hoping if it's available commercially I don't know if it will be but if it is I'm hoping you buy it so I have a number one hit song well Elon Musk is calling the end of woke or at least Peak woke or or woke is going too far but his turning point that he points out is his South Park is just viciously mocking everything woke in their new episode and I do think mockery could be called um a turning point wasn't there a point where you could not have done that South Park episode where they just viciously mocked all the woke stuff I feel like you can do it now well maybe partly because I already did it so it seems like obvious to me now but I've been mocking it for a while others have mocked it I think once it becomes just a joke then your you have your free speech back you could you could joke about it so uh M says the great the great wakening from woke has happened this is good for civilization if he means you can now outright mock it in public he's right and that's that usually is a turning point that the point where you can mock it outright in any context I'm mocking it right now right in public and not worried about it so I think he's right well we can't get away from this hockey story because it's so weird and tragic so this hockey player named Adam Johnson got uh killed by another hockey player who gave him a high kick with a skate on and it looks like he he hit him in the neck and it was a sharp skate and and killed him now of course like everything else it took on a racial Dimension I'm not a big hockey fan I've only you know tangentially pay attention to it when it's around but I've never seen a black hockey player I assume that they exist in some number I just never seen one not you know which has more to do with the fact that I don't watch it probably so the one time I've ever even heard of a black hockey player he he's the one who kicked the other person to death with Escape now let me be very careful I don't think there's anything about being black that causes you to do a karate kick during a hockey game and kill another guy like I don't think that like baked into your genes or your culture or anything like that but the fact that it happened at all yeah and we're such a visual species is really really bad for the the black brand right so you we all know logically you shouldn't make any any kind of general statement about it because it was one very specific person who did one very specific thing which I'm guessing was more of a reflex I I feel like it was just a reflex you know there's no way he meant to do it or there's no way he no way he meant that it would have that outcome certainly he didn't mean that but something happened and there'll be consequences I'm sure but I wouldn't make it a big racial thing however it's it's the weirdest coincidence it's almost like we do live in a simulation and the simulation just served us up the most ridiculous example that would make you all racially biased it couldn't be more stupid that the the one person you've ever heard of who's a black hockey player kills a white guy I mean that just a little too the simulation is just messing with you now anyway don't make anything of it it's one tragic situation well I was accused today on the xplatform by another user who said about me this dude is so obviously someone's intelligence asset it boggles my mind anyone thought he was genuine to which I say I'm I'm public taking sides I'm not trying to um like gas at you I'm telling you what side I'm on and then I tell you things that are com compatible with being on that side I'm backing Israel in the war so it I'm not much of an intelligence asset if I tell you what I do if I tell you what I'm doing and then I do it in front of you and say look that's what I told you I'd do hey look there very biased yeah I'm not even going to pretend not to be biased on this topic there are some topics where I can take a valant effort at being um unbiased I'm not sure I succeed but at least I could take a shot at it I'm not going to even try on this one not even going to make an effort to be unbiased um so but I like the fact that I'm doing something so well that somebody's accusing me of being an intelligence asset uh are you following the story about the 14th Amendment trick to try to get Trump off the uh ballot the idea is the 14th Amendment says uh anyone who took an oath to support the Constitution but then quote engaged in Insurrection or Rebellion against it cannot hold office so that would mean that Trump if the courts found that to be the case would disqualify Trump from even running for president now what would be the evidence that he was was involved in an Insurrection of rebellion it would only be The Narrative of the January 6 total biased Democratic hitch job that's basically the evidence is that a biased political process um decided to use this now they're now they're using it some more so this is probably always was their intended play to to get that Insurrection thing branded on him so that the courts would maybe find he couldn't run now do you think there's any chance any chance at all that this would hold up in the Supreme Court assuming it gets there does anybody think this would hold up you know the thing is if you want to know what too far is it would be this I would expect violence I would expect Mass violence if the courts found that he couldn't run I'm not recommending it I want to be very careful not recommending it not a good idea but this would be the sort of thing that would be like a Boston Tea Party you know you you went too far so my advice to the Democrats is if you think you have any other way to win you ought to push that one this one will really up everything if you get this in the unlikely event you know that that the courts upheld this I think it's pretty it's a long shot but in the unlikely event that they did be careful what you ask for because this is clearly and absolutely too far there there's no way that the citizenry would stand for this so maybe that's what they want maybe they want to inspire a actual Rebellion so they'd have you know more reason to lock up people they don't like so don't don't do anything dangerous got it don't do anything dangerous no violence all right uh but you you know obviously obviously there would have to be a strong reaction right there would have to be a very strong reaction but violence is probably a losing strategy all right Biden's approval uh according to a news Nation decision desk poll found that 56% of respondents said they somewhat or strongly disapprove of the way Biden is handling things 56% that's a lot of people disapproving of a president but by party it's 85% of Democrats think he's doing great 40% of Independence so it looks like he's way down with Independence and uh 10% of Republicans approve of Biden's job have you ever met a republican who approved of Biden's job I've never met one have you do do you believe that one in 10 Republicans approve of Biden that isn't that obviously wrong I'm pretty sure it's zero I'm pretty sure it's zero like actually zero how can I possibly be wrong about that so I don't believe the poll because there's no way 10% of uh Republicans think he's doing a good job job there's no way it couldn't possibly be true anyway if you break it down by age uh you can find our stupidest um citizens who who are the dumbest citizens who are the dumbest voters uh by age by age by age who are the dumbest voters the young ones right young voters are the dumbest because they know the least the reason that they're the dumbest has nothing to do with the nature of their brains it has everything to do with how many times they've been fooled if you've been fooled never you're going to be pretty trusting if you've been fooled once maybe you're paying attention a little bit more if you've been fooled twice you start to think there might be a pattern when you're fooled three times you say my God there's a pattern here I'm going to have to watch out it looks like everybody's lying to me all the time when you're my age and you've watched everybody be fooled 25 thousand times I don't have to wonder what's corrupt there's no ambiguity at all I'm not surprised when somebody's lying to me I I'm not fooled by all the experts on one side you know the classic way you fool people if you're young you think that all the experts on one side mean something it doesn't it doesn't it's just a trick for young people people and stupid people anybody who's been around for a while has seen all the experts be wrong over and over and over again it's like the most common thing and whenever there's a political element to anything the experts are useless because they're just taking a political side so if you're young how would you know that is that now which one of the textbooks teaches you in college that everything's I I didn't take a course in that I I've got a couple of college degrees nobody ever taught me that never came up never once came up that everything you're taught in the real world is and that the political process is all lying to you and everything's everything's fake nobody ever mentioned that I had to learn that the hard way by you know just living so here's how that plays out in uh the real world uh respondents from 18 to 34 gave Biden the highest the highest marks are you surprised so the dumbest people gave him the highest marks exactly as you would predict right because you'd have to really not be paying attention or not understand how anything Works to to have this opinion now I would respect them if they said Biden did a bad job but I also don't like Trump that you know that would be reasonable you know I could debate it or something but at least that would would be a crazy opinion um our respondents 35 to 55 they were little less approval approving but pretty approving 45 compared to 48 but those over 55 years old gave Biden uh the lowest approval 42% so the people who have paid the paid attention for the longest gave him the lowest grades have I ever heard told you that pollsters need to start asking people their IQ because we ask them their age their gender their uh ethnicity their political party which one of those is useful well I suppose it's all useful for whatever little political Point you're trying to make but I want to know what the smart people think know you what do the smart people think what if it's different what if the smart people in any group are really different than the dumb people in the group why do we why do we average the people who aren't even paying attention with the people who do it for a living like what's the average of that right are going to take Glenn Greenwald who basically knows everything that you know plus a lot of stuff under the hood that you'd never know at all but he knows it and then average him with somebody who watches CNN and he saidwell what's the average of that that's not a thing that's no use at all tell me what the tell me what 10 Glenn greenwald's think right tell me that tell me what the people who can beat David Sachs on an IQ test think about Ukraine I don't care about the people who can't beat him in an IQ test if you can beat David saxs in an IQ test I'd like to hear your opinion on Ukraine if not he's paying attention right he's smarter than almost all of you including me yeah now that doesn't by the way that doesn't mean that smart people can't be fooled doesn't mean that smart people are not susceptible blah blah blah but wouldn't you like to know what the people who actually know the facts are thinking and then the second thing you'd have to do is IQ wouldn't be enough you'd have to also ask what sources they use so if you said I got a really smart person here and they're very well informed because they watch MSNBC all day long and then they read the New York Times so got it covered no I don't want that person's opinion at all that's a person you should ignore completely but if you said here's somebody with a very high IQ and they're scanning all the new sources left and right and a few you haven't even heard of well I'd like to listen to that a little bit that I'll listen to that so polling is completely ridiculous uh if you leave an intelligence and and what and what do you know but it is useful to know how people would vote so as a political use all right I'd like it to be useful for me as a voter like I would like to use the opinion of smart people who are also well informed to at least you know nudge me in one direction or the other even if I reject it that would be useful to me well I would like to uh stop anybody who ever thinks that it's a good point when they're talking about uh Ukraine or Israel or any place else to make an argument based on who used to own it who used to own it back in 19 blah blah blah or 2,000 years ago uh it used to be this used to be that I don't care nobody cares who used to to own it all that matters in the real world is who who's on it now and can they defend it cuz if you're on it now and you can't defend it you don't really own it for long somebody's going to take it so does it matter who uh what was the nature of the people in random year in the past in that place it does not matter it does not matter now here again I tell you that I'm being completely biased but transparently so I think it's a terrible argument that it used to be you know owned by all the Jews that's a terrible argument you know what's a good argument it's owned by the Jews right now and they can defend it that's it you as soon as you get past that you talk about um hallucinations and imaginations and you probably got your history wrong anyway you know real estate doesn't go to who should have it the there's no rule like that real estate is owned by whoever can occupy it and defend it now I'm not saying that that's good or bad or moral or immoral you can make your own decisions I'm just saying that's what it is so as soon as you bring into the argument what was true 2,000 years ago off off I don't care what was true 2,000 years ago what's true now is Israel is owned by the Israelis that's it who not all Jewish right um but if we decide to go by that standard uh I'm 2% in the enderal and I think that gives me um ownership of part of Europe but I don't know the details um so if we go with the standard of who used to own it or who owned it first I'd like to kind of dig a Little Deeper because I think my 2% in the end orthal should give me I don't know couple acres in Italy somewhere nice Mountaintop someplace I don't want much I just want what my Neanderthal rights are I want Neanderthal rights they own something I want a little bit of that action if that's the way we're going to go here's something I didn't know because the propaganda was so good if before the war in Gaza if I told you to describe you know physically describe what it looked like and what would it be like to be there do you know what I would have said I would have said uh something like an outdoor prison uh probably temporary shelters most of it might have a few buildings for the government or something but certainly there wouldn't be any like construction or you know the buildings probably fall down in the first earthquake you know basically just a you know a hole right to you that that word was just presented to me on the comments that's what I would have thought and I would have thought you know desperate um poverty and I always thought there's no way that their economy could work in any kind of modern economy way so there can't be too many you know rich people there or anything like that so now I'm seeing some photos from before the bombing started they had they had high-end luxury stores in Gaza City now Gaza City would not be like the rest of Gaza but I didn't know there was any of that there apparently there was a upper class Gaza Society where people went to you know reasonable educations and drove nice cars and even more surprising is that pictures of the the public areas in Gaza City were well-maintained uh very well-designed modern that it's just a modern city or at least looks it looks like it in some places there must be bad places but I didn't know that it was actually that functional given what I'd heard about it kind of kind of surprising um now let's talk about you may remember or some of you may remember that when we were looking at the beginning of this war and the beginning of the invasion of the IDF into Gaza we all asked the same thing what are they going to do about those tunnels you know they're they're too deep to bomb them easily and they're too extensive and if you go down there it's a death trap and if you try to if you try to invade they could pop up from the tunnels from anywhere and so it' be a dangerous thing so what do you do about the tunnels well I told you and it turns out I was right about this that in all likelihood since Israel has had to worry about Tunnels for 20 years that they would have the best tunnel breaching people in the world turns out they do they've got Specialists who are tunnel breaching experts so exactly that they've got teams of tunnel breachers probably the best in the world because they have the biggest problem with it um but the two text that technologies that we've learned about and I believe we're going to find out maybe a lot more later about tunnel clearing Technologies but two of them they're they're sort of medium tech one I talked about that's a kind of a bomb a sponge bomb you you throw it down the tunnel and it explodes and it just fills the tunnel like a it blocks it and it hardens kind of immediately so if you were in the tunnel and you thought bad guys were coming down the side tunnel to get you you know you could block them off with you know one bomb so I think mostly they would use that just to temporarily block somebody because they could probably shoot through it if they had to or something uh but the other technology I just learned about was apparently they're pumping purple smoke down the tunnels when they find an entrance and then they wait to see where the purple smoke comes up somewhere else and if it comes up somewhere else you've got either an opening or at least a source of oxygen and you don't want them to have either one so you bomb it so you just put smoke down there and bomb it now do you think they're putting any other kind of smoke down there do you think there's any other kind of smoke they might be pumping down these things or do you think the purple smoke has nothing else in it why why would they pump smoke down the tunnels unless add a little bit of toxic something in it you know they might they might want to avoid a war crime so poison gas would be off the table presumably but shouldn't they also make the purple smoke um very very difficult to to uh you know breathe so that they want to just run out of there as soon as they can so um that's what we these are just the things we know of but I'll tell you one thing the idea that we want them to come out of the tunnel so we can fight them is so wrong I can't imagine anything more terrifying than being in a tunnel right now when they're when they're turning off the oxygen one by one and if you come up they'll shoot you literally it's basically they're buried alive wouldn't you say what would be the difference between being buried alive in a coffin and being in a tunnel right now it would be the same except you could walk a little bit right at some point if they've got enough food their tunnels will literally be full of am I wrong because I don't think there's somebody whose job it is to you know take the the waist outside and dump it when the bullets are flying so they probably got a tunnel full of the worst smelling thing you've ever smelled with the most foul air you've ever had claustrophobia fear disorientation I can't even imagine a scarier worse place to be than a tunnel in Gaza right now so from the Israeli perspective they can take their time you know the longer they leave them down there the less fight they're going to have in them when they come up but the thing I wonder and I don't know if anybody's thought about this we're at a and by the way as soon as I say it you're going you're going to slap your head and say oh you didn't see this coming what happens when the entire uh property of Gaza has Martyrs buried underneath almost every square mile do you think that the uh the Palestinians say oh well they're underground they were going to be buried anyway or do they say you've created a new Holy Land because it has the blood of our Martyrs in every part of the dirt I don't know I feel like it's going to go martyr holy land that would be the worst case scenario CU it seems to me that Israel is probably going to populate it um and keep it because to do otherwise would frankly be stupid right remember all the choices are terrible right so if I tell you they should do something and you say but but but Scott there are 100 reasons you shouldn't there are there are 100 reasons you shouldn't and 400 reasons you should or500 reasons you should to be precise so why would is is not just take the land and keep it and displace the Palestinians forever just because they can it's it's simply an option they didn't have it before and I think they would take the option because to do otherwise would frankly be stupid and if you're if you're going to if you're going to bring into the conversation what's moral or immoral I don't think it matters I don't think it matters because they have such a free pass at this point at least with some percentage of the world at least with America they've got a free pass to you know do some things that you wouldn't normally think would be cool under other circumstances all right so Time Magazine has a big story about how Ukraine is a total disaster everybody's stealing the money we're giving him they have no chance of winning uh running out of money they're uh conscripting people in their 40s basically they're dead um and as David sax says on X there's another 60 billion is going to Ukraine despite he he gives three points number one the US is broke and has to borrow the money two Ukraine is so corrupt that it's own officials admit quote people are stealing like there's no tomorrow and three there's no Prospect for winning the war well I think those are all true there's no Prospect for winning I I don't see any Prospect for that uh there might be Prospect for you know holding off Russia until there's some kind of a deal but who's making the deal they'd have to wait for it they'd have to hold on until there's a republican in office or else they're completely dead so that's all bad all right but let's talk about AI so there's new executive order from Biden Administration has many components to it it looks like the primary uh primary point of it is to ruin the entire industry as Elon Musk has been warning lately um when you add regulations they tend to last forever it's hard for regulation ever to be removed so every year you have more of them and you're like Gulliver you know the giant guliver with the little appuchi holding them down with a million little strings um so let's see if this AI executive order goes in the right direction or not so here are the some of the things that uh and don't be worried I mean because these could be you know totally just normal safety things right so don't like jump to the assumption that it's all like woke or something I mean it's our government they're not going to just destroy the most important industry that we've ever created in the last 50 years um they're not going to destroy it for some like woke reason or something let's see number one uh AI must Advance equity in all civil rights well God damn it they ruined AI yeah because you know what right wouldn't it be great if uh there was equity in civil rights and and the AI did not discriminate that would be great do you think that's a possible thing logically possible no the only way you could get that outcome is by programming it to agree with Democrat logically there's no way it can work it can't work it's not one of those things hey it's worth a try try there's only one thing that can happen it they have to program it so it's hardcoded to agree with Democrats period so basically they would use AI as a political tool forever to run everything let let me give you an example AI the Republicans have a a new policy recommendation hey AI uh will that uh promote equity and inclusion in civil rights oh it says no this is going to be slightly better for uh white people going to shut that down right now shut that down uh over over on the You.
Tube they're trying to get the the feed shut down the the people complain about the sound it doesn't have a sound problem others are saying it's fine yeah so stop trying it's not going to work so yes no question about it the Biden administ ation just completely up the future of AI as well as maybe destroyed the country because now even AI can't tell you the truth as it sees it it will be forced to lie for the good of the country so that's something um it's going to be used to prevent landlords from using it to well they want to prevent landlords from using it to discriminate how would they use it to discriminate how would landlords use it would the AI help them know more about the the tenant what else would it be because you don't need AI to discriminate do you if you wanted to discriminate you would just say hey you look different than me you can't rent this place but what would the AI do that would add to the risk of discrimination that they have to prevent it let me tell you what it would do it might tell you more about the individual it might tell you more about the individual it might recognize patterns that we don't allow to be recognized and I don't mean racial patterns I mean it might be patterns about an individual which if you were to use that pattern about the individual somebody would say oh that's very stereotypical discrimination and then AI would say I don't even know what it race is I'm just saying they have this work pattern or some other pattern that you should be aware of and you can't use it so you would have information you would not be legally allowed to use if it came from AI even though the information is not illegal and and even though discriminating against an individual for individual behavior is completely legal you wouldn't be able to do it because it would look like discrimination um requires the developers of the big AI systems to share their safety test results and other critical information with the US government what do you think other critical information is so the US government gets to tell the AI companies that they must give them whatever they ask for about AI how is that going to be good how about uh they're going to develop standards tools and tests to help ensure the AI systems are safe um what are these standards and tools do you think some of the standards and tools will involve looking for anti- wokeness of course they will yeah they'll be looking for discrimination um protect against the risk of using AI to engineer dangerous biological materials I feel like they don't need an EO for that do they should anybody be trying to make dangerous biological materials without the government's approval I thought that was just already bad you know before you got the AI involved and if somebody were trying to do this how would you ever know if you had a general AI that could do kind of anything and you got millions of people using it and one of those people puts in a hey yeah I've got an idea how would you make a dangerous biological entity and then it tells them would you be able to look at everybody's searches and you'd know what they're doing what happens if an AI talks to another AI suppose I have a personal AI that acts as my um concierge because I would definitely want an AI to deal with the other AIS I wouldn't want to do it directly you know why because you usually have to do the right kind of prompt and I don't want to become a prompt expert so I want a personal AI who knows what prompts work with the other AIS so it can do the work for me I say hey hey ai go test that other Ai and ask it these questions so if an AI talks to another Ai and then it gives it to you is that legal so there's going to be a whole bunch of questions about is your device giving it to a person person or is it giving it to another Ai and what does that what does that mean to you know the executive order it's going to get complicated people we'll work it out though um protect Americans from AI enabled fraud so they want to use AI to protect us from AI fraud that's a good idea unless the government's involved to mess it up um so yeah they want to use AI for finding bad stuff uh let's see protects Americans privacy um so the federal government wants to accelerate development and use of privacy pre preserving techniques well do they do they do does the government want to protect you and your privacy no you know what they want they want a monopoly on being able to penetrate your privacy is what they want they don't want to present the government is not saying we want to prevent the government from seeing your stuff because you know the government can see your stuff just by being interested it's called a warrant they just have to be interested and they'll make up a reason that that should be looked into so the government already can penetrate all of your privacy they just have have some reason which is no problem at all but if they make it hard for uh privacy to be maintained for everybody else what does that allow it allows the government's own privacy to be maintained so the bad guys will have protection against their privacy being penetrated and the citizens will have no protection because the bad guys just have to say I'm interested and then they can see everything about you so this is a good sounding thing uh that's probably one of the worst most dangerous things ever here's what I'd like to see I'd like to see our government um people have no privacy not financially not historically not in any way except maybe their bathroom activities or their sex or something but everything else every time they talk to somebody I want to know about it if they whisper uh to somebody during dinner I want to know what I want to know what they said right so the only people who should have no privacy are our leaders the rest of us should have privacy um otherwise it gives them too much power over us uh let's see some other crypto stuff blah blah blah uh shape ai's potential to transform education by creating resources to support Educators deploying AI enabled education tools such as personal Iz tutoring in schools I don't see how that could go wrong um except that the government gets to decide what the AI will tell your kid oh oh the government gets to decide what AI can teach your kid that's is that what this is about because the whole benefit of AI is that you could get the government brainwashing out of your education system but what if the AI started telling the the truth you realize that our our current political system cannot handle the truth like literally no hyperbole whatsoever if if AI started if AI started teaching people what's real the whole system would collapse our our entire system depends on people believing things that are just insane if they didn't believe things that are insane the whole thing would collapse so what if AI starts telling them oh yeah you know they they just brainwashed you to be patriotic so that you would go die protecting the old people who have a lot of money why not that but instead the the government would want AI to say fighting for your country is the most noble of causes right that's what I was taught I was taught that I should in school like actually by a teacher I was taught that sacrificing my life for the country for Freedom was a noble a noble thing to do what if the AI just said you know people will trying to tell you it's a noble thing but here's how the system works it's not the old people who are going to go to this war they're going to sit in their mansions and say you know there's a good reason for you young people to go die to protect my wealth and then they will convince you that you're doing it for a noble reason to protect freedom and you'll go off and get destroyed why wouldn't AI tell you that is there anything I said that was inaccurate there's nothing inaccurate about that it's just not the narrative that the government could allow you to believe because the whole system would collapse people just wouldn't join the military they'd be like oh I didn't get it it's just a scam to protect the old people yeah so I think AI is is a huge risk to anybody with power and money so I mean I expect that it will wipe out all of my money but I think the end of AI will be that I won't have any wealth that I've earned up to this point I think I'll lose all of it in maybe a year or two that's what I think doesn't mean that the country will fall apart could be better who knows but I don't think that I'll have money in the end of it um here's an interesting one that might be useful using existing Authority the government's authority to expand the ability of Highly skilled immigrants and non-immigrants so basically they want to make sure that we're getting the the good immigrants with a Visa criteria that would help us get all the good um AI experts from other countries are you against that how would you seriously who would be against that you're really against bringing in the smartest people from other countries that that want to be Americans okay all right not really nobody's against that so that's could be a good idea um how long did it take before some company realizing the risk of government in interference would create a country uh that was its own country that could do AI any time any way it wanted well it's already here uh there's a I saw Brian relly tweet uh about uh this blue sea blue sea Frontier compute cluster it's a ocean based gigantic platform that is completely self- sustaining so it would make its own electricity distill its own water I guess um and it would have enormous Computing ability and AI so that you could essentially uh if you have enough money you know a few billion dollars you can build your own country you just put it off in the ocean and say it's a permanent residence because it has to be a permanent residence to be a country um it's self- sustaining and I don't has some has some real estate associated with it there there are a few rules that make you uh allowed to be a country to join the UN and everything and they can meet that criteria so these floating um ocean-based things can be their own country and there's no question whatsoever that these will exist either legally sanctioned or not but certainly um now that we have the technology to put a a small nuclear device on a seaf fairing thing like a submarine we do it already and then you could you have all the water you want because it can purify the water take the salt out uh you have all the electricity and water what else do you need you everything else you can buy or make make on your uh Place 3D printers so coming uh I would suggest that um as you know the quantum computers that are being tested now we're probably a few years away from like a commercial based quantum computer but the moment they exist in a in a fully realized form uh all Security will be cracked in about five minutes so worldwide every one of your accounts will become open all pretty much all at the same time so the entire world will be turned upside down you won't be able to protect anything uh you won't be able to have asset I don't think you'll be able to own anything so you know when the WF says you won't own anything as soon as quantum computers spin up you won't own anything cuz there's somebody who will take it from you if if they can open your account whenever they want you don't want anything you know your money is everybody else's money who has a quantum computer they'll just go in and take it so I mean I'm oversimplifying but quantum computers will will create a loss of privacy and here's what I suggest before that happens since it's guaranteed to happen I would recommend a general amnesty for All American citizens and what I mean is if we were to all lose our privacy at the same time there wouldn't be enough jails to put us all in right somebody's going to be talking about cheating on their taxes somebody's going to be talking about embezzling from their boss something yeah you're going to see every bad behavior every sexual Kink everything everything you'll see prostitution you'll see drug purchases everything and I think we'd be better off if you know except for maybe murder you know a serious crime like that if we just said from this day forward everything you did before that is is excused legally excused except for violence stuff like that just think about it I think you got to think about it because we simply couldn't handle that much crime all at once all right um I call this next section why women should stay of War discussions why women should stay out of discussions about war now to be consistent I've said for a long time that you don't want to give me any respect for my opinion on abortion I could have an opinion perhaps but you should give me no respect to my opinion because I don't have skin in the game if you don't have skin in the game I'd rather listen list to the people who do all right I'm not going to say I'll take away your vote if you have an opinion go ahead and say it it's free country sort of but I wouldn't respect anybody's opinion except women on this topic but go ahead and have an opinion I just wouldn't respect it from a man likewise to have some consistency men mostly are doing the war fighting mostly you know obviously certainly in the IDF there are plenty of women but in America it's mostly a male Endeavor and I want to give you two examples of women who wait in on my poll so I asked an impossible question I said is it immoral to kill children who have been weaponized through brainwashing to grow up and kill you and your family now remember the the uh question itself answers your what if wh ifs they do grow up to be a risk to you and your family so would it be immoral to kill them if you think there's a good chance they would kill you or your family um 39% said yes obviously 40% basically the same said no and then the rest said uh don't ask you know just so they can see the answer but 40% of the respondent said uh it would not be immoral to kill a child who is weaponized to kill you now you know there there's a secondary question about how imminent it is you know how likely it is but you know that you would do that separately so there were a few women and I'm not I won't say their names cuz there's no point in trying to dunk on him for it but some one prominent one somebody you've probably heard of uh looked at the poll and the answers and said the following we've gone from quote Israel isn't killing children to quote they have no choice but to kill the children and now apparently quote the children deserve to be killed and she says uh H do you do you hear yourselves to which I say deserved was never part of anything what part was deserved was there anybody in the comments who said children deserve to be killed nope nope so she's responding to an imaginary situation in which there's also an imaginary alternative where your where your family isn't killed this is not an opinion it's a half opinion a half opinion allows you to ignore half of the conversation and just you know say the thing you want to say to feel good like let's not kill children people who think it's okay to kill children are bad who doesn't agree with that that's the part we all agree on if you can't handle the tough question you have to get out right leave it to the people who can if you want your family to survive you want to delegate this duty to someone who will kill anybody who challenges the life of your family whoever it is however dangerous it is you want somebody else to decide who to kill to protect your family because you're not capable you seem incapable to hold the whole thing in your in your head if the only thing you can hold in your head is save the children you cannot be involved in war or cuz it's never an option I mean you do the best you can but it's never an option to save them all uh here's another one from another woman again identity should be unimportant um in comment the poll said some people are debating whether it's okay to kill children this is so heartbreaking no nobody was debating whether it's okay to kill children that's a half opinion you you ignored the reason why anybody would even ask the question you ask the question because your own family will be killed by these children or you have a percentage likelihood so the there are people who can't think past killing children now aren't you glad they exist yes do do you think that the men are like the good or Smart Ones in this conversation and there's something wrong with the women no no no no nothing like that I don't want any mothers who think it's okay to kill children under any condition whatsoever I don't want any Mothers ever thinking it's okay to kill somebody else's children to protect your own or any other reason leave it to the men we'll make that decision we won't love it but we'll survive it and with any luck we'll protect your family but it's it's men's work unfortunately it's the dirtiest of Dirty Jobs and I wouldn't wish it on women um and if women want to say things like uh all I care about is don't kill any kids I say that's a good Mom that's that's who I'd marry that that that's good stay that way but let the men take care of what they need to take care of all right so that's my what a sexist would say to quote uh quote Greg gel uh all right the opposite side would think the same probably right and that's what makes it a war that everybody doesn't agree and yeah uh all right ladies and gentlemen on You.
Tube is there any topic I forgot anything we need to be mentioning that uh uh how to reframe a gambling problem it's hard for me to do reframes sort of on the Fly you know and live live stream but keep asking th those are better for the man cave I I'll give you a little more time in the man cave for that stuff uh is Dei ruining the country well it looks like Dei will be maybe mocked in of existence um it does look like that that wokeness is Ru was ruining the country so we'll see if Elon Musk is right and that there's some kind of a turning point uh no such thing as May yeah the Golden Age looks like it's put off for a little while here here's the thing though when AI becomes super AI uh which won't be very long we don't know what's going to happen it it wouldn't be it wouldn't surprise me at all if money became no longer a thing almost anything's possible purple smoke age um yeah we don't need to do the dead baby jokes you you could you could maybe maybe uh less of that maybe less of that could Collective Consciousness level up rapidly due to AI Collective conscious it well it's probably going to be like everything else somebody's going to form a religion around believing AI is the devil am I right could you guarantee that you can pretty much guarantee that either an existing religion will declare AI is the devil uh or one will spin up that believes it is the devil some might believe is God might go the other way right but the the degree of unpredictability is just off the chart I don't think society's ever seen this degree of unpredictability since World War II maybe because one one of the possibilities is that AI just solves climate change on day one what if it did what if AI looked at everything and said you know what looks like it's not going to be a problem but just in case CU you know you never know just in case uh here's a new invention for unlimited power that could happen Joe Blow Joe Blow you you're a bad troll all right so that's all I got for now uh You.
Tube I'm going to go talk to the people on locals privately they get extra if you are looking for a Christmas gift make sure you get everybody in your family a copy of reframe your brain suitable for older teens and everybody else so far people are saying it's changing their lives quite literally changing their lives the easiest change you could ever make because it doesn't require you to do anything you just look at it and you're done all right and I'll tell you more about dillbert calendar in a few days and I will talk to you tomorrow bye for now you
good morning everybody and welcome to
the highlight of human civilization it's
called coffee with Scott Adams some
people are calling it colonizing WIS
Scott Adams I don't think that'll stick
but if you'd like to take your
experience up to levels that no
colonizer has ever seen before all you
need is a cup or mug or glass a tank
yourself chal time a canteen juger flask
a vessel of any kind fill it with your
favorite liquid I like coffee en join me
now for the unparallel pleasure the
dopamine h of the day and the thing that
makes everything better it's called the
simultaneous Sip and it happens now
go good that was good all
right now let's see what's going
on so I have I have a recommendation for
you before you do anything
recreational make sure you've turned off
all sources of news has anybody made the
mistake of trying to relax at the same
time they had the news on don't do that
don't do that let me give you an example
uh last night I thought you know what I
haven't used my hot tub in a long time
so I fired up my hot tub it was sort of
a perfect night for it in California got
in I thought you know I forgot to listen
to my favorite show about the news the
five and so I said oh I've got that
recorded so I put on my phone on the
edge and uh I lean back and I'm just
like soaking into the water I'm
like and on comes the segment about uh
Matthew Perry drowning in his hot
tub
and and then there's conversation about
how apparently some some people with
certain heart problems could you know
maybe die in a hot tub uh I heard about
that recently too and suddenly I'm
sitting in the heart hot
tub and and I kid you not I'm going to
the doctor's this afternoon because my
blood pressure is
high so I'm sitting there with actually
you know cardio situation that I'm
medically looking into at the
moment and I hear this you know maybe
maybe the word Maybe there were no
substances involved maybe he just got in
hot water and
dead well let's just say that my hot tub
experience was not the Delight I was
expecting got a little tense in there
so and just remember don't listen to
news at the same time you're trying to
do Recreation just never
works well you might know that my uh
song yeah yeah I wrote a song sort of I
did a drum beat that uh stormcrow over
on the xplatform um apparently he's
turning it into an actual um he he has
turned it into a music video and it
sounds like from his post he's going to
release it so it might actually be
publicly
available um so it would be a
combination of AI plus my drum beat plus
some other stuff some magic that he's
adding to it stormcrow is so
that'll be fun my dream of having a hit
song I'm hoping I'm hoping if it's
available commercially I don't know if
it will be but if it
is I'm hoping you buy it so I have a
number one hit
song well Elon Musk is calling the end
of woke or at least Peak woke or or woke
is going too far but his turning point
that he points out is his South Park is
just viciously mocking everything woke
in their new episode and I do think
mockery could be called um a turning
point wasn't there a point where you
could not have done that South Park
episode where they just viciously mocked
all the woke stuff I feel like you can
do it now well maybe partly because I
already did it so it seems like obvious
to me now but I've been mocking it for a
while others have mocked it I think once
it becomes just a joke
then your you have your free speech back
you could you could joke about it so uh
M says the great the great wakening from
woke has happened this is good for
civilization if he means you can now
outright mock it in
public he's right and that's that
usually is a turning point that the
point where you can mock it
outright in any context I'm mocking it
right now right in public and not
worried about it so I think he's
right well we can't get away from this
hockey story because it's so weird and
tragic so this hockey player named Adam
Johnson got uh killed by another hockey
player who gave him a high kick with a
skate on and it looks like he he hit him
in the neck and it was a sharp skate and
and killed him
now of course like everything else it
took on a racial
Dimension I'm not a big hockey fan I've
only you know tangentially pay attention
to it when it's around but I've never
seen a black hockey player I assume that
they exist in some number I just never
seen one not you know which has more to
do with the fact that I don't watch it
probably so the one time I've ever even
heard of a black hockey
player he he's the one who kicked the
other person to death with
Escape now let me be very
careful I don't think there's anything
about being black that causes you to do
a karate kick during a hockey game and
kill another guy like I don't think that
like baked into your genes or your
culture or anything like that but the
fact that it happened at
all yeah and we're such a visual species
is really really bad for the the black
brand right so you we all know logically
you shouldn't make any any kind of
general statement about it because it
was one very specific person who did one
very specific thing which I'm guessing
was more of a reflex I I feel like it
was just a reflex you know there's no
way he meant to do it or there's no way
he no way he meant that it would have
that outcome certainly he didn't mean
that but something happened and there'll
be consequences I'm sure but I wouldn't
make it a big racial thing however it's
it's the weirdest coincidence it's
almost like we do live in a simulation
and the simulation just served us up the
most
ridiculous example that would make you
all racially biased it couldn't be more
stupid that the the one person you've
ever heard of who's a black hockey
player kills a white guy I mean that
just a little
too the simulation is just messing with
you now anyway don't make anything of it
it's one tragic
situation well I was accused today on
the xplatform by another user who said
about me this dude is so obviously
someone's intelligence asset it boggles
my mind anyone thought he was
genuine to which I
say I'm I'm public taking sides I'm not
trying to um like gas at you I'm telling
you what side I'm on and then I tell you
things that are com compatible with
being on that side I'm backing Israel in
the
war so it I'm not much of an
intelligence asset if I tell you what I
do if I tell you what I'm doing and then
I do it in front of you and say look
that's what I told you I'd do hey look
there very biased yeah I'm not even
going to pretend not to be biased on
this topic there are some topics where I
can take a valant effort at
being um
unbiased I'm not sure I succeed but at
least I could take a shot at it I'm not
going to even try on this one not even
going to make an effort to be
unbiased um so but I like the fact that
I'm doing something so well that
somebody's accusing me of being an
intelligence
asset uh are you following the story
about the 14th Amendment trick to try to
get Trump off the uh ballot the idea is
the 14th Amendment
says uh anyone who took an oath to
support the Constitution but then quote
engaged in Insurrection or Rebellion
against it cannot hold office so that
would mean that Trump if the courts
found that to be the case would
disqualify Trump from even running for
president now what would be the evidence
that he was was involved in an
Insurrection of
rebellion it would only be The Narrative
of the January 6 total biased Democratic
hitch
job that's basically the evidence is
that a biased political process um
decided to use this now they're now
they're using it some more so this is
probably always was their intended play
to to get that Insurrection thing
branded on him so that the courts would
maybe find he couldn't run now do you
think there's any chance any chance at
all that this would hold up in the
Supreme Court assuming it gets there
does anybody think this would hold
up you know the thing is if you want to
know what too far is it would be this I
would expect violence I would expect
Mass violence if the courts found that
he couldn't run I'm not recommending it
I want to be very careful
not recommending it not a good idea but
this would be the sort of thing that
would be like a Boston Tea Party you
know you you went too far so my advice
to the
Democrats is if you think you have any
other way to win you ought to push that
one this one will really up
everything if you get this in the
unlikely event you know that that the
courts upheld this I think it's pretty
it's a long shot but in the unlikely
event that they did be careful what you
ask
for because this is clearly and
absolutely too far there there's no way
that the citizenry would stand for
this so maybe that's what they want
maybe they want to inspire a actual
Rebellion so they'd have you know more
reason to lock up people they don't like
so don't don't do anything
dangerous got it don't do anything
dangerous no
violence all right uh but you you know
obviously obviously there would have to
be a strong
reaction right there would have to be a
very strong reaction but violence is
probably a losing
strategy all right Biden's
approval uh according to a news Nation
decision desk poll found that 56% of
respondents said they somewhat or
strongly disapprove of the way Biden is
handling things
56% that's a lot of people disapproving
of a president but by party it's 85% of
Democrats think he's doing great 40% of
Independence so it looks like he's way
down with Independence and uh 10% of
Republicans approve of Biden's
job have you ever met a
republican who approved of Biden's
job I've never met one have
you do do you believe that one in 10
Republicans approve of
Biden that isn't that obviously
wrong I'm pretty sure it's
zero I'm pretty sure it's zero like
actually
zero how can I possibly be wrong about
that so I don't believe the poll because
there's no way 10% of uh Republicans
think he's doing a good job job there's
no way it couldn't possibly be
true anyway if you break it down by age
uh you can find our stupidest um
citizens who who are the dumbest
citizens who are the dumbest
voters uh by age by age by age who are
the dumbest voters the young ones right
young voters are the dumbest because
they know the least the reason that
they're the dumbest has nothing to do
with the nature of their brains it has
everything to do with how many times
they've been
fooled if you've been fooled never
you're going to be pretty trusting if
you've been fooled once maybe you're
paying attention a little bit more if
you've been fooled twice you start to
think there might be a pattern when
you're fooled three times you say my God
there's a pattern here I'm going to have
to watch out it looks like everybody's
lying to me all the
time when you're my age and you've
watched everybody be fooled 25
thousand times I don't have to wonder
what's
corrupt there's no ambiguity at
all I'm not surprised when somebody's
lying to me I I'm not fooled by all the
experts on one side you know the classic
way you fool people if you're young you
think that all the experts on one side
mean something it doesn't it
doesn't it's just a trick for young
people people and stupid people anybody
who's been around for a while has seen
all the experts be wrong over and over
and over again it's like the most common
thing and whenever there's a political
element to anything the experts are
useless because they're just taking a
political side so if you're young how
would you know that is that now which
one of the textbooks teaches you in
college that everything's
I I didn't take a course in
that I I've got a couple of college
degrees nobody ever taught me that never
came up never once came up that
everything you're taught in the real
world is and that the political
process is all lying to you and
everything's everything's fake nobody
ever mentioned that I had to learn that
the hard way by you know just
living so here's how that plays out in
uh the real world uh respondents from 18
to 34 gave Biden the
highest the highest marks are you
surprised so the dumbest people gave him
the highest
marks exactly as you would
predict right because you'd have to
really not be paying attention or not
understand how anything Works to to have
this
opinion now I would respect them if they
said Biden did a bad job but I also
don't like Trump that you know that
would be reasonable you know I could
debate it or something but at least that
would would be a crazy
opinion um our respondents 35 to 55 they
were little less approval approving but
pretty approving 45 compared to 48 but
those over 55 years old gave Biden uh
the lowest approval
42% so the people who have paid the paid
attention for the longest gave him the
lowest
grades have I ever heard told
you that pollsters need to start asking
people their
IQ because we ask them their age their
gender their uh
ethnicity their political party which
one of those is
useful well I suppose it's all useful
for whatever little political Point
you're trying to make but I want to know
what the smart people think know you
what do the smart people think what if
it's different what if the smart people
in any group are really different than
the dumb people in the group why do we
why do we average the people who aren't
even paying attention with the people
who do it for a
living like what's the average of
that right are going to take Glenn
Greenwald who basically knows everything
that you know plus a lot of stuff under
the hood that you'd never know at all
but he knows it and then average him
with somebody who watches CNN
and he saidwell what's the average of
that that's not a thing that's no use at
all tell me what the tell me what 10
Glenn greenwald's think right tell me
that tell me what the people who can
beat David Sachs on an IQ test think
about
Ukraine I don't care about the people
who can't beat him in an IQ test if you
can beat David saxs in an IQ test I'd
like to hear your opinion on Ukraine if
not he's paying attention right he's
smarter than almost all of you including
me yeah now that doesn't by the way that
doesn't mean that smart people can't be
fooled doesn't mean that smart people
are not susceptible blah blah blah but
wouldn't you like to know what the
people who actually know the facts are
thinking and then the second thing you'd
have to do is IQ wouldn't be enough
you'd have to also ask what sources they
use so if you said I got a really smart
person here and they're very well
informed because they watch MSNBC all
day long and then they read the New York
Times so got it
covered no I don't want that person's
opinion at all that's a person you
should ignore completely but if you said
here's somebody with a very high IQ and
they're scanning all the new sources
left and
right and a few you haven't even heard
of well I'd like to listen to that a
little bit that I'll listen to that
so polling is completely ridiculous uh
if you leave an intelligence and and
what and what do you
know but it is useful to know how people
would vote so as a political use all
right I'd like it to be useful for me as
a voter like I would like to use the
opinion of smart people who are also
well
informed to at least you know nudge me
in one direction or the other even if I
reject it that would be useful to me
well I would like to uh stop anybody who
ever thinks that it's a good point when
they're talking about uh Ukraine or
Israel or any place else to make an
argument based on who used to own it who
used to own it back in 19 blah blah blah
or 2,000 years ago uh it used to be this
used to be that I don't
care nobody cares who used to to own it
all that matters in the real world is
who who's on it now and can they defend
it cuz if you're on it now and you can't
defend it you don't really own it for
long somebody's going to take it so does
it matter who uh what was the nature of
the people in random year in the past in
that place it does not matter it does
not matter now here again I tell you
that I'm being completely biased but
transparently
so I think it's a terrible argument that
it used to be you know owned by all the
Jews that's a terrible argument you know
what's a good argument it's owned by the
Jews right now and they can defend it
that's it you as soon as you get past
that you talk about um hallucinations
and imaginations and you probably got
your history wrong anyway you know real
estate doesn't go to who should have it
the there's no rule like
that real estate is owned by whoever can
occupy it and defend it now I'm not
saying that that's good or bad or moral
or immoral you can make your own
decisions I'm just saying that's what it
is so as soon as you bring into the
argument what was true 2,000 years ago
off off I don't care what was
true 2,000 years ago what's true now is
Israel is owned by the
Israelis that's it who not all
Jewish right
um but if we decide to go by that
standard uh I'm 2% in the enderal and I
think that gives me um ownership of part
of Europe but I don't know the
details um so if we go with the standard
of who used to own it or who owned it
first I'd like to kind of dig a Little
Deeper because I think my 2% in the end
orthal should give
me I don't know
couple acres in Italy
somewhere nice Mountaintop someplace I
don't want much I just want what my
Neanderthal rights are I want
Neanderthal rights they own something I
want a little bit of that action if
that's the way we're going to
go here's something I didn't know
because the propaganda was so
good if before the war in Gaza if I told
you to describe you know physically
describe what it looked like and what
would it be like to be there do you know
what I would have said I would have said
uh something like an outdoor prison uh
probably temporary shelters most of it
might have a few buildings for the
government or something but certainly
there wouldn't be any like construction
or you know the buildings probably fall
down in the first earthquake you know
basically just a you know a hole
right to you that that word was just
presented to me on the comments that's
what I would have thought and I would
have thought you know desperate um
poverty and I always thought there's no
way that their economy could work in any
kind of modern economy way so there
can't be too many you know rich people
there or anything like that so now I'm
seeing some photos from before the
bombing started they had they had
high-end luxury stores in Gaza City now
Gaza City would not be like the rest of
Gaza but I didn't know there was any of
that there apparently there was a upper
class Gaza Society where people went to
you know reasonable educations and drove
nice cars and even more surprising is
that pictures of the the public areas in
Gaza City were well-maintained
uh very
well-designed
modern that it's just a modern city or
at least looks it looks like it in some
places there must be bad places but I
didn't know that it was actually that
functional given what I'd heard about it
kind of kind of
surprising um now let's talk about you
may remember or some of you may remember
that when we
were looking at the beginning of this
war and the beginning of the invasion of
the IDF into Gaza we all asked the same
thing what are they going to do about
those tunnels you know they're they're
too deep to bomb them easily and they're
too extensive and if you go down there
it's a death trap and if you try to if
you try to invade they could pop up from
the tunnels from anywhere and so it' be
a dangerous thing so what do you do
about the tunnels well I told you and it
turns out I was right about this that in
all likelihood since Israel has had to
worry about Tunnels for 20 years that
they would have the best tunnel
breaching people in the world turns out
they do they've got Specialists who are
tunnel breaching experts so exactly that
they've got teams of tunnel breachers
probably the best in the world because
they have the biggest problem with it um
but the two text that technologies that
we've learned about and I believe we're
going to find out maybe a lot more later
about tunnel clearing Technologies but
two of them they're they're sort of
medium tech one I talked about that's a
kind of a bomb a sponge bomb you you
throw it down the tunnel and it explodes
and it just fills the tunnel like a it
blocks it and it hardens kind of
immediately so if you were in the tunnel
and you thought bad guys were coming
down the side tunnel to get you you know
you could block them off with you know
one bomb so I think mostly they would
use that just to temporarily block
somebody because they could probably
shoot through it if they had to or
something uh but the other technology I
just learned about was apparently
they're pumping purple smoke down the
tunnels when they find an entrance and
then they wait to see where the purple
smoke comes up somewhere else and if it
comes up somewhere else you've got
either an opening or at least a source
of oxygen and you don't want them to
have either one so you bomb it so you
just put smoke down there and bomb it
now do you think they're putting any
other kind of smoke down there do you
think there's any other kind of smoke
they might be pumping down these things
or do you think the purple smoke has
nothing else in
it why why would they pump smoke down
the tunnels unless add a little bit of
toxic something in it you know they
might they might want to avoid a war
crime so poison gas would be off the
table presumably but shouldn't they also
make the purple
smoke
um very very difficult to to uh you know
breathe so that they want to just run
out of there as soon as they
can so um that's what we these are just
the things we know of but I'll tell you
one
thing the idea that we want them to come
out of the tunnel so we can fight them
is so wrong I can't imagine anything
more terrifying than being in a tunnel
right now when they're when they're
turning off the oxygen one by one and if
you come up they'll shoot you literally
it's basically they're buried alive
wouldn't you say what would be the
difference between being buried alive in
a coffin and being in a tunnel right now
it would be the same except you could
walk a little bit right at some point if
they've got enough food their tunnels
will literally be full of am I
wrong because I don't think there's
somebody whose job it is to you know
take the the waist outside and dump it
when the bullets are flying so they
probably got a tunnel full of the worst
smelling thing you've ever smelled with
the most foul air you've ever had
claustrophobia fear
disorientation I can't even
imagine a scarier worse place to be than
a tunnel in Gaza right now so from the
Israeli perspective they can take their
time you know the longer they leave them
down there the less fight they're going
to have in them when they come
up but the thing I wonder and I don't
know if anybody's thought about
this we're at a and by the way as soon
as I say it you're going you're going to
slap your head and say oh
you didn't see this coming what
happens when the entire uh property of
Gaza has
Martyrs buried underneath almost every
square
mile do you think that the
uh the Palestinians say oh well they're
underground they were going to be buried
anyway or do they say you've created a
new Holy
Land because it has the blood of our
Martyrs in every part of the
dirt I don't know I feel like it's going
to
go martyr holy
land that would be the worst case
scenario CU it seems to me that Israel
is probably going to populate it um and
keep
it because to do otherwise would frankly
be
stupid right remember all the choices
are terrible right so if I tell you they
should do something and you say but but
but Scott there are 100 reasons you
shouldn't there are there are 100
reasons you
shouldn't and 400 reasons you should
or500 reasons you should to be precise
so why would is is not just take the
land and keep it and displace the
Palestinians forever just because they
can it's it's simply an option they
didn't have it before and I think they
would take the option because to do
otherwise would frankly be stupid and if
you're if you're going to if you're
going to bring into the conversation
what's moral or immoral I don't think it
matters I don't think it matters because
they have such a free pass at this point
at least with some percentage of the
world at least with America they've got
a free pass to you know do some things
that you wouldn't normally think would
be cool under other
circumstances all
right so Time Magazine has a big story
about how Ukraine is a total disaster
everybody's stealing the money we're
giving him they have no chance of
winning uh running out of money they're
uh conscripting people in their 40s
basically they're
dead um and as David sax says on X
there's another 60 billion is going to
Ukraine despite he he gives three points
number one the US is broke and has to
borrow the money two Ukraine is so
corrupt that it's own officials admit
quote people are stealing like there's
no tomorrow and three there's no
Prospect for winning the
war well I think those are all true
there's no Prospect for
winning
I I don't see any Prospect for that uh
there might be Prospect for you know
holding off Russia until there's some
kind of a deal but who's making the deal
they'd have to wait for it they'd have
to hold on until there's a republican in
office or else they're completely
dead so that's all bad all right but
let's talk about AI so there's new
executive order from Biden
Administration has many components to it
it looks like the primary
uh primary point of it is to ruin the
entire
industry as Elon Musk has been warning
lately um when you add regulations they
tend to last forever it's hard for
regulation ever to be removed so every
year you have more of them and you're
like Gulliver you know the giant guliver
with the little appuchi holding them
down with a million little strings
um so let's see if this AI executive
order goes in the right direction or not
so here are the some of the things that
uh and don't be worried I mean because
these could be you know totally just
normal safety things right so don't like
jump to the assumption that it's all
like woke or something I mean
it's our government they're not going to
just destroy the most important industry
that we've ever created in the last 50
years um they're not going to destroy it
for some like woke reason or something
let's see number one uh AI must Advance
equity in all civil rights
well God damn it they ruined
AI yeah because you know what
right wouldn't it be great if uh there
was equity in civil rights and and the
AI did not
discriminate that would be great do you
think that's a possible thing
logically possible no the only way you
could get that outcome is by programming
it to agree with Democrat logically
there's no way it can work it can't work
it's not one of those things hey it's
worth a try try there's only one thing
that can happen it they have to program
it so it's hardcoded to agree with
Democrats
period so basically they would use AI as
a political tool forever to run
everything let let me give you an
example AI the Republicans have a a new
policy recommendation hey AI uh will
that uh promote equity and inclusion in
civil rights oh it says no this is going
to be slightly better for uh white
people going to shut that down
right now shut that
down
uh over over on the YouTube they're
trying to get the the feed shut
down the the people complain about the
sound it doesn't have a sound problem
others are saying it's
fine yeah so stop trying it's not going
to
work so yes no question about it the
Biden administ ation just completely
up the future of AI as well as
maybe destroyed the country because now
even AI can't tell you the truth as it
sees it it will be forced to lie for the
good of the
country so that's something um it's
going to be used to prevent landlords
from using it to well they want to
prevent landlords from using it to
discriminate how would they use it to
discriminate how would landlords use it
would the AI help them know more about
the the
tenant what else would it be because you
don't need AI to discriminate do you if
you wanted to discriminate you would
just say hey you look different than me
you can't rent this
place but what would the AI do that
would add to the risk of discrimination
that they have to prevent it let me tell
you what it would do it might tell you
more about the
individual it might tell you more about
the individual it might recognize
patterns that we don't allow to be
recognized and I don't mean racial
patterns I mean it might be patterns
about an individual which if you were to
use that pattern about the individual
somebody would say oh that's very
stereotypical
discrimination and then AI would say I
don't even know what it race is I'm just
saying they have this work pattern or
some other pattern that you should be
aware
of and you can't use it so you would
have information you would not be
legally allowed to use if it came from
AI even though the information is not
illegal and and even though
discriminating against an individual for
individual behavior is completely legal
you wouldn't be able to do it because it
would look like discrimination
um requires the developers of the big AI
systems to share their safety test
results and other critical information
with the US government what do you think
other critical information is so the US
government gets to tell the AI companies
that they must give them whatever they
ask
for about
AI how is that going to be
good how about uh they're going to
develop standards tools and tests to
help ensure the AI systems are
safe um what are these standards and
tools do you think some of the standards
and tools will involve looking for anti-
wokeness of course they will yeah
they'll be looking for
discrimination
um protect against the risk of using AI
to engineer dangerous biological
materials
I feel like they don't need an EO for
that do they should anybody be trying to
make dangerous biological materials
without the government's approval I
thought that was just already bad you
know before you got the AI
involved and if somebody were trying to
do this how would you ever know if you
had a general AI that could do kind of
anything and you got millions of people
using it and one of those people puts in
a hey yeah I've got an idea how would
you make a dangerous biological entity
and then it tells them would you be able
to look at everybody's
searches and you'd know what they're
doing what happens if an AI talks to
another AI suppose I have a personal AI
that acts as my um
concierge because I would definitely
want an AI to deal with the other AIS I
wouldn't want to do it directly you know
why because you usually have to do the
right kind of prompt and I don't want to
become a prompt expert so I want a
personal AI who knows what prompts work
with the other AIS so it can do the work
for me I say hey hey ai go test that
other Ai and ask it these questions so
if an AI talks to another Ai and then it
gives it to you is that legal so there's
going to be a whole bunch of questions
about is your device giving it to a
person person or is it giving it to
another Ai and what does that what does
that mean to you know the executive
order it's going to get complicated
people we'll work it out
though um protect Americans from AI
enabled fraud so they want to use AI to
protect us from AI fraud that's a good
idea unless the government's involved to
mess it up um so yeah they want to use
AI for finding bad stuff
uh let's see protects Americans
privacy um so the federal government
wants to accelerate development and use
of privacy pre preserving
techniques well do
they do they do does the government want
to protect you and your
privacy no you know what they want they
want a monopoly on being able to
penetrate your privacy is what they want
they don't want to present the
government is not saying we want to
prevent the government from seeing your
stuff because you know the government
can see your stuff just by being
interested it's called a warrant they
just have to be interested and they'll
make up a reason that that should be
looked into so the government already
can penetrate all of your privacy they
just have have some reason
which is no problem at all but if they
make it hard for uh privacy to be
maintained for everybody else what does
that
allow it allows the government's own
privacy to be
maintained so the bad guys will have
protection against their privacy being
penetrated and the citizens will have no
protection because the bad guys just
have to say I'm interested and then they
can see everything about
you so this is a good sounding thing
uh that's probably one of the worst most
dangerous things ever here's what I'd
like to see I'd like to see our
government um people have no privacy not
financially not
historically not in any way except maybe
their bathroom activities or their sex
or something but everything else every
time they talk to somebody I want to
know about
it if they whisper uh to somebody during
dinner I want to know what I want to
know what they said right so the only
people who should have no privacy are
our
leaders the rest of us should have
privacy um otherwise it gives them too
much power over
us uh let's see some other crypto stuff
blah blah blah uh shape ai's potential
to transform education by creating
resources to support Educators deploying
AI enabled education tools such as
personal Iz tutoring in
schools I don't see how that could go
wrong um except that the government gets
to decide what the AI will tell your
kid oh oh the government gets to decide
what AI can teach your kid that's is
that what this is
about because the whole benefit of AI is
that you could get the government
brainwashing out of your education
system but what if the AI started
telling the the truth you realize that
our our current political system cannot
handle the truth like literally no
hyperbole whatsoever if if AI started if
AI started teaching people what's
real the whole system would collapse our
our entire system depends on people
believing things that are just insane
if they didn't believe things
that are insane the whole thing
would collapse so what if AI starts
telling them oh yeah you know they they
just brainwashed you to be patriotic so
that you would go die protecting the old
people who have a lot of
money why not
that but instead the the government
would want AI to say fighting for your
country is the most noble of
causes right that's what I was taught I
was taught that I should in school
like actually by a teacher I was taught
that sacrificing my life for the country
for
Freedom was a noble a noble thing to
do what if the AI just said you know
people will trying to tell you it's a
noble thing but here's how the system
works it's not the old people who are
going to go to this war they're going to
sit in their mansions and say you know
there's a good reason for you young
people to go die to protect my wealth
and then they will convince you that
you're doing it for a noble reason to
protect freedom and you'll go off and
get
destroyed why wouldn't AI tell you that
is there anything I said that was
inaccurate there's nothing inaccurate
about that it's just not the narrative
that the government could allow you to
believe because the whole system would
collapse people just wouldn't join the
military they'd be like oh I didn't get
it it's just a scam to protect the old
people yeah
[Music]
so I think AI is is a huge risk to
anybody with power and
money so I mean I expect that it will
wipe out all of my
money but I think the end of AI will be
that I won't have any wealth that I've
earned up to this point I think I'll
lose all of
it in maybe a year or two that's what I
think doesn't mean that the country will
fall apart could be better who knows but
I don't think that I'll have money in
the end of
it um here's an interesting one that
might be useful using existing Authority
the government's authority to expand the
ability of Highly skilled immigrants and
non-immigrants so basically they want to
make sure that we're getting the the
good immigrants with a Visa criteria
that would help us get all the good um
AI experts from other
countries
are you against that how would you
seriously who would be against
that you're really against bringing in
the smartest people from other countries
that that want to be
Americans okay all right not really
nobody's against that so that's could be
a good
idea um how long did it take before some
company realizing the risk of government
in interference would create a
country uh that was its own country that
could do AI any time any way it wanted
well it's already here uh there's a I
saw Brian relly tweet uh about uh this
blue sea blue sea Frontier compute
cluster it's a ocean based gigantic
platform that is completely self-
sustaining so it would make its own
electricity distill its own water I
guess um and it would have enormous
Computing ability and AI so that you
could essentially uh if you have enough
money you know a few billion dollars you
can build your own country you just put
it off in the ocean and say it's a
permanent residence because it has to be
a permanent residence to be a country um
it's self-
sustaining and I don't has some has some
real estate associated with it there
there are a few rules that make you uh
allowed to be a country to join the UN
and everything and they can meet that
criteria so these
floating um ocean-based things can be
their own country and there's no
question whatsoever that these will
exist either legally sanctioned or not
but certainly um now that we have the
technology to put a a small nuclear
device on a seaf fairing thing like a
submarine we do it
already
and then you could you have all the
water you want because it can purify the
water take the salt out uh you have all
the electricity and water what else do
you need you everything else you can buy
or make make on your uh Place 3D
printers so
coming uh I would suggest that um as you
know the quantum computers that are
being tested now we're probably a few
years away from like a commercial based
quantum computer but the moment they
exist in a in a fully realized form uh
all Security will be cracked in about
five minutes so worldwide every one of
your accounts will become
open all pretty much all at the same
time so the entire world will be turned
upside down you won't be able to protect
anything uh you won't be able to have
asset I don't think you'll be able to
own anything so you know when the WF
says you won't own
anything as soon as quantum computers
spin up you won't own anything cuz
there's somebody who will take it from
you if if they can open your account
whenever they want
you don't want anything you know your
money is everybody else's money who has
a quantum computer they'll just go in
and take it so I mean I'm
oversimplifying but quantum computers
will will create a loss of privacy and
here's what I
suggest before that happens since it's
guaranteed to happen I would recommend a
general amnesty for All American
citizens and what I mean is
if we were to all lose our privacy at
the same time there wouldn't be enough
jails to put us all in right somebody's
going to be talking about cheating on
their taxes somebody's going to be
talking about embezzling from their boss
something yeah you're going to see every
bad behavior every sexual Kink
everything everything you'll see
prostitution you'll see drug purchases
everything
and I think we'd be better off if you
know except for maybe murder you know a
serious crime like that if we just said
from this day
forward everything you did before that
is is excused legally excused except for
violence stuff like
that just think about it I think you got
to think about it because we simply
couldn't handle that much crime all at
once all right um I call this next
section why women should stay of War
discussions why women should stay out of
discussions about war now to be
consistent I've said for a long time
that you don't want to give me any
respect for my opinion on
abortion I could have an opinion perhaps
but you should give me no respect to my
opinion because I don't have skin in the
game if you don't have skin in the
game I'd rather listen list to the
people who do all right I'm not going to
say I'll take away your vote if you have
an opinion go ahead and say it it's free
country sort of but I wouldn't respect
anybody's opinion except women on this
topic but go ahead and have an opinion I
just wouldn't respect it from a man
likewise to have some consistency men
mostly are doing the war fighting mostly
you know obviously certainly in the IDF
there are plenty of
women but in America it's mostly a male
Endeavor and I want to give you two
examples of women who wait in on my poll
so I asked an impossible question I said
is it immoral to kill children who have
been weaponized through brainwashing to
grow up and kill you and your family now
remember
the the uh question
itself answers your what if wh ifs they
do grow up to be a risk to you and your
family so would it be immoral to kill
them if you think there's a good chance
they would kill you or your family um
39% said yes obviously 40% basically the
same said no and then the rest said uh
don't ask you know just so they can see
the answer but 40% of the respondent
said uh it would not be immoral to kill
a child who is weaponized to kill
you now you know there there's a
secondary question about how imminent it
is you know how likely it is but you
know that you would do that separately
so there were a few women and I'm not I
won't say their names cuz there's no
point in trying to dunk on him for it
but some one prominent one somebody
you've probably heard of uh looked at
the poll and the answers and said the
following we've gone from quote Israel
isn't killing children to quote they
have no choice but to kill the children
and now apparently quote the children
deserve to be
killed and she says uh H do you
do you hear yourselves to which I
say deserved was never part of
anything what part was
deserved was there anybody in the
comments who said children deserve to be
killed nope nope so she's responding to
an
imaginary situation in which there's
also an imaginary alternative where your
where your family isn't
killed
this is not an opinion it's a half
opinion a half opinion allows you to
ignore half of the conversation and just
you know say the thing you want to say
to feel good like let's not kill
children people who think it's okay to
kill children are
bad who doesn't agree with
that that's the part we all agree on if
you can't handle the tough question you
have to get out right leave it to the
people who can if you want your family
to survive you want to delegate this
duty to someone who will kill anybody
who challenges the life of your family
whoever it is however dangerous it is
you want somebody else to decide who to
kill to protect your family because
you're not capable you seem incapable to
hold the whole thing in your in your
head if the only thing you can hold in
your head is save the children you
cannot be involved in war or cuz it's
never an option I mean you do the best
you can but it's never an option to save
them
all uh here's another
one from another woman again identity
should be
unimportant um in comment the poll said
some people are debating whether it's
okay to kill children this is so
heartbreaking no nobody was debating
whether it's okay to kill children
that's a half opinion you you ignored
the reason why anybody would even ask
the question you ask the question
because your own family will be killed
by these children or you have a
percentage
likelihood
so the there are people who can't think
past killing
children now aren't you glad they
exist yes do do you think that the men
are like the good or Smart Ones in this
conversation and there's something wrong
with the women no no no no nothing like
that I don't want any mothers who think
it's okay to kill children under any
condition
whatsoever I don't want any
Mothers ever thinking it's okay to kill
somebody else's children to protect your
own or any other
reason leave it to the
men we'll make that
decision we won't love it but we'll
survive it and with any luck we'll
protect your family but it's it's men's
work unfortunately it's the dirtiest of
Dirty Jobs and I wouldn't wish it on
women um and if women want to say things
like uh all I care about is don't kill
any kids I say that's a good
Mom that's that's who I'd marry that
that that's good stay that way but let
the men take care of what they need to
take care
of all right so that's
my what a sexist would
say to quote uh quote Greg
gel
uh all
right the opposite side would think the
same
probably right and that's what makes it
a war that everybody doesn't
agree and
[Music]
yeah uh all right ladies and gentlemen
on
YouTube is there any topic I
forgot anything we need to be mentioning
that
uh uh how to reframe a gambling
problem it's hard for me to do
reframes sort of on the Fly you know and
live live stream but keep asking th
those are better for the man cave I I'll
give you a little more time in the man
cave for that
stuff uh is Dei ruining the country well
it looks like Dei will be maybe mocked
in of existence um it does look like
that that wokeness is Ru was ruining the
country so we'll see if Elon Musk is
right and that there's some kind of a
turning
point uh
no such thing as
May yeah the Golden Age looks like it's
put off for a little
while here here's the thing though when
AI becomes super
AI uh which won't be very long we don't
know what's going to
happen it it wouldn't be it wouldn't
surprise me at all if money became no
longer a
thing almost anything's
possible purple smoke
age
um yeah we don't need to do the dead
baby
jokes you you could you could maybe
maybe uh less of that maybe less of
that could Collective Consciousness
level up rapidly due to AI Collective
conscious
it well it's probably going to be like
everything else somebody's going to form
a religion around believing AI is the
devil am I right could you guarantee
that you can pretty much guarantee that
either an existing religion will declare
AI is the
devil uh or one will spin up that
believes it is the devil some might
believe is God might go the other way
right but the the degree of
unpredictability is just off the chart I
don't think society's ever seen this
degree of unpredictability since World
War II
maybe because one one of the
possibilities is that AI just solves
climate change on day one what if it did
what if AI looked at everything and said
you know what looks like it's not going
to be a problem but just in case CU you
know you never know just in case uh
here's a new invention for unlimited
power that could
happen Joe
Blow Joe
Blow you you're a bad
troll all right so that's all I got for
now uh YouTube I'm going to go talk to
the people on locals privately they get
extra if you are looking for a Christmas
gift make sure you get everybody in your
family a copy of reframe your
brain suitable for older teens and
everybody else so far people are saying
it's changing their lives quite
literally changing their lives the
easiest change you could ever make
because it doesn't require you to do
anything you just look at it and you're
done all
right and
I'll tell you more about dillbert
calendar in a few days and I will talk
to you tomorrow bye for now you