Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive August 22, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #1947

Episode 1947 Scott Adams - The Laptop From Hell Is The Gift That Keeps On Giving. Explaining Ye, More

Episode #1947 Dec 4, 2022 1:29:35 34,307 views

Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com Content: ----------- - AI studying Twitter - Twitter's prior "hive mind" - Elon Musk's ex-wife tweet - MSM suppression of TwitterGate story - The left suffers Narrative Poisoning - The history of Ye, look for the pattern ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

Opening General Commentary

Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization that at least half of the country knows about. The other half? Well, they seem to be in their own little world

View segment →
SimultaneousSip General Commentary

and we have no connection to them. But if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that can only be accomplished with illegal drugs but without the illegal drugs, all you need is a copper mug or a glass or a tankard or a stainless steel canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind filled…

View segment →
QandA General Commentary

for the unparalleled pleasure. It's the dopamine. The other day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. But it happens now. Scott, would you be so kind to start the YouTube stream about 30 seconds early, meaning before the start time? I don't know about that. Is t…

View segment →
NewsReaction Health & Biohacking

, excuse the ads. Oh, it's the ads, right? So if you don't have the YouTube Red you have to look at it. Okay, I got it. Got it. Okay, we'll see what we can do. Well, here's some good news potentially. I always like to follow Machiavelli's Underbelly, a good Twitter account. Yeah, it was fun. Intere…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

orst thing. But I wasn't sure it was a prank until some other people confirmed it because the reality and parody are so similar. So here's the first thing that the prankster said that made me say, huh, that does sound ridiculous but not more ridiculous than what actual real people say. So see if yo…

View segment →
MainContent AI & Technology

You know that would be an entirely legitimate thing to do. But are you comfortable with AI knowing everything about your Twitter experience? If AI learned about me only from Twitter could it reproduce my personality? If it only knew my Twitter experience it could reproduce it but it would be an att…

View segment →
MainContent Decision Making

he left of being racist. I don't know, it's kind of perfect. But you also knew that that's where I had to go, right? Once your model of the world is that it's groups against groups all you see is groups and everything is one group against another. So the left has to eat itself in the long run. The…

View segment →
NewsReaction Politics as Persuasion

f attention you could actually argue maybe it's working in his favor in a weird kind of way because he's done that before. That would be a standard play. But does it look like that? Here's what I wonder. I'm watching Elon Musk and also Ye attract all the energy and I think Trump is left sort of ener…

View segment →
MainContent Politics as Persuasion

what he did with his inflation and some of his work policies but I was willing to maybe overlook some of those things for the unity of the country. But he has a Hagar the Horrible comic behind his desk. I can't ignore that. I can't ignore that. Yeah no he didn't go full pickles. If he had gone full…

View segment →
QandA General Commentary

sed right now. Would you agree? How many of you would say yeah you're definitely being suppressed. There's no question about it. Yeah your geniuses. Every one of you are geniuses. That's true. All right so here's what Justine continues to say. She said so let me get this straight we are now suppose…

View segment →
NewsReaction General Commentary

oji would have decreased the impact or the perfection of it. It was just perfect. Yeah I think it was smirking face. It's just like well what do you say to that? There's literally no comment about it that could have helped. It was just it just has to sit there on its own. Just it is what it is. But…

View segment →
MainContent Media & Fake News

ally everything you suspected was true about everything. Just about everything. It was all true in some form. So every time the conservatives have this I got you this time feeling what always happens? We've been through this before right? Ah we got you this time. Now that the truth has come out wat…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

view and somehow they can incorporate all the counter factuals and still go along. It's like serious implied or is sort of an imposed mental illness. It's like a mental illness that's imposed on them from the outside by the narratives. I wonder if you could have narrative poisoning. Yeah I think I'…

View segment →
MainContent Two Movie Screen

isoning, TDS, and they acted on their mental health. They acted to reduce their mental health problems and they used Twitter like it was a pharmaceutical drug that if they tweaked it just right they could reduce their mental health issues. And so they did. So they did. How much do you love that the…

View segment →
MainContent Persuasion

ay and they put a big scientific chart with data I just say well that's probably not true. I'm not going to ignore it because you know when experts say something you don't want to ignore it. It might be true but the credibility is below zero now. Do you think that the mental health community the ex…

View segment →
NewsReaction Media & Fake News

main thing you should not say in that situation which is somebody else should have won this award. Right? Would you agree that whatever else it was and you'll have lots of descriptions of how bad it was would you agree that he shouldn't have said it? Can you all give me that it was something that ve…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

annot do that. And they started to work with Milo Yiannopoulos. You can't do that. No no you cannot say there's anything good with Milo because if you do it would feel like you're supporting pedophiles wouldn't it even though Milo is not accused of pedophilia. He is accused of something that has a d…

View segment →
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

at they need to stop doing that because it's putting me in physical danger? Have I ever said that you need to stop using your free speech because it puts me in physical danger? I've noted that it does. I've noted that it does but that's different than saying they need to stop it right? Not once. No.…

View segment →
Closing General Commentary

locals is our pirate ship. That Scott your struggles are uncertain comp. Okay. My comp. Oh my struggle. I got it. Got it. Took me a while to put that together. He's trying to destroy his brand. I don't know. I mean he's already done that as something wrong. There's an article already about me. Is t…

View segment →

Good morning everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization that at least half of the country knows about. The other half? Well, they seem to be in their own little world and we have no connection to them.

But if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that can only be accomplished with illegal drugs but without the illegal drugs, all you need is a copper mug or a glass or a tankard or a stainless steel canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind filled with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure. It's the dopamine. The other day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. But it happens now.

Scott, would you be so kind to start the YouTube stream about 30 seconds early, meaning before the start time? I don't know about that. Is that because you missed a simultaneous sip? Because the recorded version has it all. Is it when you live stream you miss the first 30 seconds? Is that what happens? I'll look into that. Maybe there's something I can do.

Yeah, how can I start before I start? Exactly. Perfectly good question. Oh, excuse the ads. Oh, it's the ads, right? So if you don't have the YouTube Red you have to look at it. Okay, I got it. Got it. Okay, we'll see what we can do.

Well, here's some good news potentially. I always like to follow Machiavelli's Underbelly, a good Twitter account. Yeah, it was fun. Interesting positive things happening in the technology. So there's some scientists at the University of Birmingham in the UK and they figured out how to use laser light treatment to improve your memory by up to 25 percent. Your short-term memory anyway. They don't know if it lasts, but they think they could also use this light treatment for ADHD. Now apparently it's non-invasive. So I don't know exactly where do they shine the light? It's a laser and it's non-invasive, but what exactly is a non-invasive laser? Do you shoot a laser in somebody's eyes? I guess so, probably.

But as you know, if Trump supported this it would be reported as Trump favors injecting bleach into people's eyes to improve their ADHD. That would be the story. Well, you know it would. You know it would. So maybe that'll be cool. Maybe they can treat ADHD now.

Let me tell you my experience with light as a professional writer. I put great care into the physical environment in which I try to write. A huge difference. I like to have both of my feet on the ground, not crossed. If I cross my legs or put my feet up I tend to sleep. I also have to have the right kind of distraction and physical environment. But the light I've discovered is one of the biggest factors. If you get the light right you can write for a long time. If you get the light wrong that puts you in a whole different physical mode. So I do think that it could be that we will unlock all kinds of benefits with light treatments. Or bleach.

There's also a potential obesity treatment in which they can give you some kind of a compound that will change the nature of the fat in your body so that it still does whatever fat needs to do in your body that's good for you but it doesn't get bigger. What do you think of that? I feel like there could be an accidental impact of that. Do you know how much I would eat if I didn't get fat? The only thing that keeps me from eating all day long is that I don't want to be overweight. If I could eat and not get fat, oh my God, I'd just be eating and pooping all day long. I'd be as happy as hell. Well, it doesn't take much to keep me happy I guess.

How many of you saw the prankster who talked at the Austin city council meeting and he did what I call embrace and amplify? Oh thank you John, sunlight is good. So this prankster pretends to be a real person and he's wearing a communist shirt, pro-communism, and he gets up and he does a whole thing about how Elon Musk taking over Twitter is the worst thing. But I wasn't sure it was a prank until some other people confirmed it because the reality and parody are so similar.

So here's the first thing that the prankster said that made me say, huh, that does sound ridiculous but not more ridiculous than what actual real people say. So see if you think this is way too ridiculous or something that an average person if you stopped him on the street might actually say, like an actual thing a person would say. He said that Elon Musk taking over Twitter is worse than the Holocaust and it might even be worse than January 6th. Now is that perfect? That's some good writing. First of all that's really good writing for a prank. Elon taking over Twitter is worse than the Holocaust and it might even be worse than January 6th, implying that January 6th was worse than the Holocaust.

And the thing is I think he finished his entire thing without people catching on that it was a prank. Now would you like to end wokeness forever? How about doing more of this? Suppose every single public hearing had one of these but you kept getting closer and closer to reality so they really actually couldn't tell if you were kidding. Like they just couldn't tell. What would happen? What would happen if you took all of the arguments on the right and you started making them even stronger than they are? But what would happen if every time some medicine came out the Democrats thought was a good idea you accused them of drinking bleach? I recommend it. Just do everything they do and act like you're serious about it. It would just make everything ridiculous. The entire world would just become absurd overnight but it would be funny.

Here's something we learned. So there was a project called OpenAI that was supposed to be I guess non-profit and the idea was they had developed AI and I don't know, it'd be good for the world I guess. There's some profit element to it now. But we learned from Elon Musk that OpenAI had access to Twitter data to train. It had access to Twitter data. Now I think that means more than just reading what you and I read. I think that means the API, meaning that you could get directly into the data stream of Twitter with permission. You know that would be an entirely legitimate thing to do. But are you comfortable with AI knowing everything about your Twitter experience?

If AI learned about me only from Twitter could it reproduce my personality? If it only knew my Twitter experience it could reproduce it but it would be an attenuated version. Twitter me is not me. You know that, right? My Twitter personality is not like my base personality. In the same way if I talk to a child that's not my base personality. That's how I modified to talk to a child. If I give a talk in front of a big crowd in public that's not my actual personality. That's my modified personality for an audience. This isn't my real personality. This is my modified personality for the purpose of doing the live stream, right? They're all versions of me so they're not dishonest because they're the real version of me modified to the purpose. But there's no version that's me.

But what if AI said well I'm gonna, I've got like 10,000 tweets and likes and stuff from this guy. I reproduce them based on what I know from Twitter. Be a little dangerous wouldn't it? Because it wouldn't necessarily know that's not me. That is my performance version of me.

Yeah, speaking of the performance version of people, that's a theme we might get to a little bit. But you know you wonder if Musk actually blocked OpenAI temporarily anyway. Blocked AI from using Twitter data which seems like the right move until you know a little bit more about the ramifications of that. I like that and I also like the transparency because Musk told us what it was and what it is and flagged it as a potential problem without any specifics. And if you don't know what the specific problem is then pausing to find out is exactly the right thing to do. So good on him.

I saw somebody on the left criticize Musk for trying things and then reversing them. And I think you mentioned three or four things that he tried at Twitter and then quickly reversed as if that's him doing a bad job. How much more wrong could you be about something in public? To imagine that rapidly trying things in software, because it's a software-based company, rapidly trying things, seeing how they do, how they're accepted, rapidly adjusting right in front of you. And there's somebody who says that's failing. Like oh that's a bad job. You tried these things and then you reversed them.

Now if a hundred percent of everything you tried got reversed well then you'd have some kind of a point. But if nine out of ten things he tries gets reversed you do not have a point. Because that's the game, is to get one out of ten that works and keep it. And you try ten things to get one that works. That'd be about what I would expect. One out of ten would be pretty good actually if you got one out of ten.

So The Washington Post is accusing MSNBC of racism for firing one of their black journalists. Is there anything else to say about that story? And like I could put more words around it but I feel like that's like the seed of a story. I can just give you the seed and then it goes to your head and it blossoms into the whole story. Like I don't need to add anything do I? The left is accusing the left of being racist. I don't know, it's kind of perfect. But you also knew that that's where I had to go, right?

Once your model of the world is that it's groups against groups all you see is groups and everything is one group against another. So the left has to eat itself in the long run. The inevitable evolution of the left is it has to eat itself. It has to break into atomized parts and start fighting. The right does not necessarily have that fate.

Why does the right have more protection against devolving into a bunch of partisans? It's the Constitution. Because people, because whatever you believe as long as you're pretty serious about the Constitution yeah you're on my side. I'm not a conservative but if you're real serious about the Constitution you're on my side. That's the beginning of the end of my analysis of your value. If you're not on the side of the Constitution well you're a risk to me. That's a risk. I'm not saying you're a bad person but it's a risk to me. But if you're on the same side as the Constitution you and I can live together and I can disagree with you about all kinds of stuff. Won't make any difference to me. In fact I might even enjoy the disagreement. Might add to the flavor of my life. But yeah you're fine with me as long as we agree on the Constitution.

Let's see. I wonder if there are any people associated with the right who don't like the Constitution because that would be weird. In fact if you were a political figure on the right and you were anti-Constitution that would be pretty much the end of you wouldn't it?

Well next story. Trump is in favor of ignoring the Constitution. So he posted on Truth Social. He said quote, do you throw the presidential election results of 2020 out and declare the rightful winner, which would be him of course in his view, or do you have a new election? A massive fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations and articles even those found in the Constitution. Trump wrote. And we're done and we're done and we're done.

Now here's the only way that this could be okay. The only way I could understand this as being okay is if Trump is simply trying to bring some attention to himself by saying the most outrageous thing you could say and getting everybody talking about it. But unfortunately the left, or fortunately maybe, the left has decided that he will get no attention and so has Fox News and I think Breitbart's sort of on that page now. So Trump's ability to say outrageous things and get attention is really diminished. Really diminished.

So if it successfully got him all kinds of attention you could actually argue maybe it's working in his favor in a weird kind of way because he's done that before. That would be a standard play. But does it look like that? Here's what I wonder. I'm watching Elon Musk and also Ye attract all the energy and I think Trump is left sort of energy poor. There's not enough energy going in his direction and so he's got to top Elon Musk, the laptop story and whatever the hell Ye is doing today to get to greater level of outrageousness than our baseline. Because the baseline is so outrageous now that getting above that takes a little work.

Barry I'm going to get rid of you just for being an... there's no other reason. You're just an... goodbye. Poor Barry. Barry we will miss you. No we won't. We won't miss you Barry.

So in my opinion Trump has very little room to operate because to get more outrageous than what is the baseline there's just no room left. You have to go all the way to maybe we should throw out the Constitution. Now you can't defend Trump after he says maybe you throw out the Constitution because that was the setup, right? The setup was hey January 6 is about Trump wanting to overthrow the country and be a dictator to which all of us said no that's not what that was. That's totally not what that was. That was the opposite. That literally the opposite. The protesters wanted to make sure the system worked the way it was designed and they weren't sure that that was happening so they asked for a delay to make sure that the Constitution is working the way it was designed. That's all.

But the left created this trap that said you know it really was trying to overthrow the Constitution and the country and then Trump walks right into the trap by saying after all of this, after all the energy I wasted explaining that January 6 wasn't what you thought it was, it's an op by the left and it is. But all that wasted time defending that you know the at least the Trump supporters were on the right side and he just threw them under the bus because all of those January 6 supporters are going to be tarred by this opinion because people, the left is going to say well Trump just said directly let's get rid of the Constitution right. He said it directly if it helps him ignore the Constitution. And now they're going to tar all those well-meaning patriots who really were just trying to make it a better country and all of them are going to be tarred by this. They should drop him like the hottest rock of all time. I don't see any way he comes back from this. He's just so done right? That's my... I had one red line. Would you agree?

Well I mean I wouldn't support somebody who was actually literally racist. I wouldn't do that. That's a red line. But the other red line is you have to be on the side of the Constitution. Is that asking a lot to be on the side of the Constitution? Yeah. Fentanyl is a single issue vote but you know I would still allow that somebody's in the contest but really I don't know.

So I think Trump is as done as you could possibly be which is interesting because who's left now? What happens if Trump is not viable but nobody primaries him because nobody else is viable because Trump will take him out? It's gonna get real interesting.

Scott you did not read the entire quote. I don't need to. I don't need to read the entire quote. If you're saying that the entire quote would soften it or change its meaning that's irrelevant because the way it will be presented is the way I just presented it. So if you think that I'm ignoring the truth the truth isn't part of the topic. The topic I'm talking about is what will people think and feel about it. The truth is somewhat irrelevant. You know what was he really thinking or what did he technically say? Not relevant. Just not relevant. Because he walked into a trap and then he sprung it on himself.

What am I supposed to ignore that? Junior Coltrane Scott is a real Sam Harris in all caps. I can't even tell if you're real or a troll.

All right. Biden has a new tweet with a photo of him in the Oval Office working and I noticed he's got a comic strip that's framed on the table behind him. Now as you know I was not a supporter of President Biden but I was willing to based on which comic that was. It was a little blurry but some people did some research and they determined that the comic was Hagar the Horrible. Hagar the Horrible. I was willing to let it go when I found out that Biden was a huge liar all of his career, said a lot of things about himself that weren't true. I was annoyed when he pushed the fine people hoax and he was running for office to end the lying by being a huge liar. I was concerned about his dealings with or Hunter's dealings with foreign countries and I didn't like what he did with his inflation and some of his work policies but I was willing to maybe overlook some of those things for the unity of the country.

But he has a Hagar the Horrible comic behind his desk. I can't ignore that. I can't ignore that. Yeah no he didn't go full pickles. If he had gone full pickles which is another comic that would be too far but Hagar? Hagar? I don't know if I can forgive that.

Let's talk about Twitter because that's what we do every day. So Elon Musk has confirmed something I was speculating about. He said the more Twitter improves its signal to noise ratio the less relevant conventional news becomes. And he followed up with another tweet. He said the intelligence of this hive mind meaning Twitter will improve significantly as signal to noise, effective cross-linking of tweets and speed of tweets all improve.

So remember I said that the thing you have to be cautious about when you're trying to predict whether Elon Musk will be successful with Twitter is the thing you have to understand is he's not trying to make it as successful as Twitter 1.0. He's not tweaking Twitter 1.0. He's probably going to create something that does payments, replaces old news, becomes the way you communicate instead of texting, probably replaces TikTok. Who knows what else it will replace? Yeah he's thinking big. And so he is literally thinking of replacing the news. But you can't replace the news if Twitter is nothing but partisans battling.

So if the only change that Musk makes is to make sure that all controversial claims are connected to some context that the other side would like you to see he has beaten the TV and other news business completely because they can't match that. The other news entities don't really even try to add context. If he did and it looks like Twitter's the perfect tool to add context, if he does there is no reason to read the news anymore.

So here's a little confirmation for the Musk opinion. My normal routine for the last several years is I get up and I look at CNN and I look at Fox News and follow some other stories in other places and then I'll also check all the tweets to see what the tweeters are saying about the news and then I have a good picture to make my comments for the day. Since Musk took over about half of the days that I come on here I have not checked CNN or Fox News because Twitter has the news and then has all the reactions to the news and a little bit more. More and more is going to have the context that was not in the news. Why would I check the news when I can get the news plus the context plus the comments? The news is already obsolete. I mean the regular news.

Here's a ten dollar question. Which government intelligence agencies do you think Epstein worked for? Well I don't think it was necessarily our government. Do you assume Epstein worked for our government exclusively? I would imagine he had some connections to a variety of high-level people and more than one country. All right so I don't assume it's some American only situation.

All right. Here's the most important thing you need to know about Elon Musk buying Twitter. You know the movie The Matrix and the star of The Matrix the character was Neo. Neo. So when Neo enters the Matrix what you should know is that was completely different than Elon entering Twitter because when Neo entered the Matrix Neo has only 75 percent of the letters that are also in the word Elon. So that's a pretty big difference. It's like a 25 percent difference in their names. Everything else is roughly the same as Neo entering the Matrix because both Twitter and the Matrix have the same purpose. The purpose of Twitter is create an artificial reality such that you don't know what the real reality is you're living in. That's literally The Matrix movie. The Matrix movie is that you believe you're in one reality but the Matrix holds you in another. That's literally what Twitter is doing. Literally they're doing that now.

Usually I make fun of people comparing things to a movie but this is not comparing. This is same as. Right? I mean not actually connected by tubes and living in a vat but we might be. We might be for all we know.

Here's the other funny Twitter related thing. Musk has got to be the best tweeter since Trump and maybe he's even better. But look at how he handled this situation with a tweet. And the tweet comes from Elon Musk's ex-wife Justine Musk. And Justine Musk on December 2nd tweeted. So I would like to note that she began her tweet with the word so. I wonder what the rest of the tweet will be. Will it be insightful analysis? What comes after the word so? Good facts and logic? Oh no. Let's read on. Let's read on and find out if we can guess what comes after the word so.

Does anybody want to take a guess? If you'd like to attest your intelligence here. Do you know what comes after the word so? Oh yes. Ridiculous straw man. A version of reality that nobody holds so that you can insult it. I wonder if that will come after the word so. Well let me read on and find out.

So let me get this straight. I'm going to give you another quiz. What follows the phrase let me get this straight? What follows let me get this straight? Would it be getting it straight or would it be intentionally distorting into something that is definitely the opposite of getting it straight? Which one do you predict because you're smart? Look at you go. Look at you go. Well you know just when I think there's a limit to your intelligence you surpass it again. I am amazed. I don't even need to give you the news anymore do I? I could just come here and you tell me the news without even knowing what it is. That's how good you are.

All right let me try it again. You think I can't do this? You fill in the blank. The Pope had a comment about Ukraine. What is it? Go. What will the Pope say about Ukraine? That this hasn't happened lately. He is against violence. He's in favor of peace. You are like geniuses. You are freaking geniuses. Wow you know the news before it happens.

All right let me ask you another. There's a gigantic blockbuster story in which everything the left has been doing for years has been uncovered and now their shame and embarrassment will eat them alive as all of their supporters and followers find out about this blockbuster laptop from hell being suppressed story on Twitter. Okay what happens next? What happens next? How did you know? How did you guess this? How did you guess that this story would be so completely suppressed that it would be as if it never happened? How did you know that the only people that would hear the blockbuster story are the people who already knew it was true and not a single other person will hear it unless it's paired with some explanation of why it's not really what you think it is?

Well you guessed pretty good because it turns out the New York Times ignored it. Washington Post ignored it. CNN ignored it. I think MSNBC ignored it. The entire left closed ranks and disappeared the story exactly like you thought they would.

Now what happens to my YouTube feed? Here I am on YouTube this big channel. Do you think YouTube is letting this go out to all the people who need to hear it? I would be highly doubtful that my YouTube feed is completely non-suppressed and that it's being treated like every other feed. Maybe. I mean anything's possible but everything we know about everything suggests that this is being suppressed right now. Would you agree? How many of you would say yeah you're definitely being suppressed. There's no question about it. Yeah your geniuses. Every one of you are geniuses. That's true.

All right so here's what Justine continues to say. She said so let me get this straight we are now supposed to step into the quote marketplace of ideas to debate plus discuss if Hitler behaved poorly or if women should be quote raped and locked in cages because these are conversations the culture needs to be having.

So what would Justine Musk's ex-husband Elon Musk, how would he reply to a tweet like that? Well the way he did reply was with one emoji and I'll try to do the emoji face so you can see it if you're listening to this and not watching. I just did a clever and humorous impression of an emoji with a wrinkled up mouth expression as in what the... yeah if there were a caption to that emoji it would be what the... It was perfect. It was perfect. Any word he had added to that emoji would have decreased the impact or the perfection of it. It was just perfect. Yeah I think it was smirking face. It's just like well what do you say to that? There's literally no comment about it that could have helped. It was just it just has to sit there on its own. Just it is what it is. But with one emoji Elon Musk described his entire marriage experience in ways which every man completely understood. Message received. Got it.

Expanding now in my mind from one emoji to whoa whoa. This is a good story. Wow. Now continue to expand to explain the entire marital dynamic ending in divorce. Got it. Got it. So that's nobody's ever said more with one emoji. You could piece together their entire history and can you imagine their arguments in person? Come on just hold it in your head. Just imagine that he had to hear that every day. How many days in a row do you have to listen to that before you say I think marriage isn't for me. I'm just going to knock up a bunch of women and have kids. I don't think this marriage thing you know by design I don't think it's a good system. It's not well engineered.

Imagine being the most storied engineer in American history although he's technically even not an engineer he just happens to be the best one. That would be the storied engineer and that's the system that you have to put yourself into. Do you think Elon Musk looks at the institution and system of marriage and says to himself now that's a good system. If I were going to engineer a system for society it would look just like that? No I don't think so.

It's just... is your mind blown away by the fact that the New York Times didn't cover the Twitter expose? Like what does that do to your head? I mean it does tell you everything you suspected was true not just about this right. I mean such a strong signal that literally everything you suspected was true about everything. Just about everything. It was all true in some form.

So every time the conservatives have this I got you this time feeling what always happens? We've been through this before right? Ah we got you this time. Now that the truth has come out watch what happens when the people on the left learn the truth. It never happens does it? There's just it just bounces off.

And I was looking at you know how will the Democrats try to put a little illusion wall around this to protect themselves and I saw this tweet by was it David Corn? Oh yeah. So he tweeted at Elon before the expose came out. He said in preparation please read my original piece on the Hunter Biden laptop. Now according to Corn the big issue, all right so ignore all the smaller issues because that's not really what's good. Here's the big issue because you don't want to be left on this little issue about maybe Democrats are getting people kicked off of Twitter and using it to affect the election. That's the small stuff so don't get lost in the weeds because here's the big story.

I don't know if you noticed but the Hunter laptop the big story as Corn tells us the big issue was that the New York Post and Giuliani used the existence of the laptop and iffy materials on it to advance Russian disinformation concocted to hurt Biden and help Trump. As of a few days ago a prominent Democrat was pushing that the laptop was not Russian disinformation but supportive of... oh my God. Present time. Press the time. No no it wasn't Russian disinformation. Did anybody tell you that? No it was information that supported the disinformation of the Russians and that disinformation I will not specify because there are no real examples to prove my point but I'd like to throw Russian disinformation into it to confuse it so that my Democrat readers will think well maybe that Republican story was wrong because there's something about still Russian disinformation in it.

And by the way it wasn't Manafort proof that the Russian collusion happened. It's the Manafort play. It's the Manafort play. Oh did you say that Trump was cleared of Russian collusion? Hahaha obviously the opposite happened because Manafort who is not Trump was guilty of a Russia related crime that wasn't specifically related to the main accusations. So good try on that.

And then have you seen the latest narrative? So all the left pundits got the memo and it's always funny when the people who realize that they're all using the same talking points when they do the little compilation so you can see that they're all little talking heads say the same thing. So the new talking point is that people who are tweeting about the Twitter revelations are doing quote PR for one of the richest men in the world. So apparently they did some research and they decided that since Democrats don't like rich people that you could just dismiss Musk for being a rich person and that why should anybody be doing PR for a rich person and that's what they have. And they're a whole bunch of tweets. They have the exact wording PR for one of the richest men in the world. They don't say it a different way. They actually use the exact sentence. Lots and lots of people.

So I wonder you know when that gets put out you know where did they all get that? They all get it from the same source right? Are they copying each other or do they actually literally have a talking points memo? They do don't they? Isn't there literally a talking point memo of some sort that they know where to look for? I think so.

All right. So Michael Tracy tweets about so Noel is it? Noel the author the old author whatever he was. So the guy who was in charge of Twitter's executive who was in charge of I guess banning people and other things. He had a public event and he said that the decision to ban Trump after January 6 was impelled in part by the trauma that he and other content monitors batteries were experiencing. So there's some confession, Joel Roth thank you, there's some confession that it wasn't purely a free speech or even a financial decision. It was how they felt. It was literally how they felt. Now it wasn't the only factor. I think you know Michael Tracy might be giving it a little more attention than it deserves. It wasn't the only factor but the fact that how they felt was any part of the decision is repeat it after me exactly what you thought it was. It's exactly what you suspected.

Have we all just turned into geniuses or are people just doing exactly what you expect all the time now? Like nobody does anything except exactly what you expected. It's like that's all there is. Has anybody done anything unexpected in a while? Well yes there is somebody doing something unexpected. Do you think I'll be talking about that person? Oh maybe. Maybe you know.

I think the problem with the Twitter content people is that they believe their own propaganda don't you? Don't you think the biggest problem that the left has with mental health is that they literally believe themselves? And I don't even know how many people who say things on the left you know the notable people who are creating the narrative. I have no idea how much they believe out of their own narrative but I know the people who consume their narrative buy into it and you'd have to think it would give you mental health problems wouldn't you? Because think about the narrative that the left is given and then all the counter factuals or the observed things that debunk their view and somehow they can incorporate all the counter factuals and still go along. It's like serious implied or is sort of an imposed mental illness. It's like a mental illness that's imposed on them from the outside by the narratives.

I wonder if you could have narrative poisoning. Yeah I think I'm going to invent a term: narrative poisoning. If the narrative which is not true causes you to have a physical reaction which is true then you have narrative poisoning. Narrative poisoning is different from just believing something that's not true. Believing something that's not true is sort of daily life. We're all believing stuff that's not true. But if you buy into a narrative and it makes you sick you have narrative poisoning. You don't have you're not sick because of reality because that's not what a narrative is. Narrative poisoning.

So I think that the Twitter executives actually had narrative poisoning and they were acting out partly on mental health issues. Let me now excuse the behavior of all the Twitter professionals. They were operating on a PTSD which they gave themselves. It was self-induced PTSD. They had narrative poisoning, TDS, and they acted on their mental health. They acted to reduce their mental health problems and they used Twitter like it was a pharmaceutical drug that if they tweaked it just right they could reduce their mental health issues. And so they did. So they did.

How much do you love that they use Twitter like a pharmaceutical to improve their mental health? That actually happened right? There's nothing about that sentence that is hyperbole. That actually literally observably happened. They've admitted they had mental distress. They told you what they did about it and in an analogy sense they use Twitter to cure their mental distress like you would use a pharmaceutical and it had side effects and the side effects were unexpected.

All right. Dr. Scott Barry Kaufman who's also an interesting fellow on Twitter I recommend him. He said today this was I'm going to disagree with him a little bit here but this was a good contribution to the conversation. He said people are blaming Ye's behavior on his bipolar diagnosis. I'd like to point out that when you see histrionic and antagonistic anti-social behaviors they are much better predicted by narcissistic personality disorder than bipolar disorder. See here for the correlation matrix. And no pun intended he shows a matrix of course. A matrix of different behaviors and what it means you know and they correlate etc.

And if you see a chart a matrix of mental let's say mental illness in 2022 what do you think about it? It just all looks like astrology. When I see a complicated medical scientific chart my immediate impression is well that's not true. It's just and it doesn't even matter what the topic is. Like it could have been any part of mental or physical health. If I've seen that complicated chart I would have just assumed it wasn't true. So that's where we are now. We're at the point where anything medical experts say and they put a big scientific chart with data I just say well that's probably not true. I'm not going to ignore it because you know when experts say something you don't want to ignore it. It might be true but the credibility is below zero now.

Do you think that the mental health community the experts do you think they can tell the difference between these various diagnoses? Do you think that if you had 10 mental health professionals and they all diagnosed Ye do you think they'd all agree? No they would not. They would not agree. Do you know why? Because it's not a science. It's not even close. It's a pharma industry created thing that's sort of trying to look like science but mostly is scams and liars and bad ideas.

Yeah so now just to be clear I'm sure there are some valuable elements of the mental health profession. I'm sure of it. But do you think I could figure out which ones are the real ones and which ones are the complete... of course not because I have no ability to do that. Do you know who else can't do that? The people in the industry. Because if they could tell what was in their own industry they'd all have the same opinion but they can't. That's why they have different opinions. And if the experts in their own industry can't tell what's real and what isn't why should you believe them?

Let's say you go to a financial expert. Financial expert says here's how you should invest. You say thank you good information. I'm going to get a second opinion though. So you go to a second financial expert and they say do something different. You go hmm two different opinions. Okay I better check with another one. Let's say you check with a bunch of financial people and you get advice that's in both directions. Some say sell your stock some say hold your stock some say get out of stocks and do something different. What would your conclusion be? Would your conclusion be that experts know more than you do and you should follow their advice because their advice was different? What you should conclude is that the experts don't know any more than you do about what a stock is going to do in the future which is true. That's been well demonstrated.

So when the experts don't agree your conclusion should be that's not really a science. It's not really it's just a scam industry. The financial advice industry is a complete scam industry that for whatever reason well not whatever reason because everybody who treats it like it's real gets a lot of money for doing it right. The TV shows that have commercials from financial institutions that would be the same as like a hair growth solution isn't that they know isn't real right? You don't think that the experts on CNBC know that the experts they have on don't know anything. Of course they know that. Do you know why the experts on CNBC know that the experts they have on don't have useful information? Because that's what every expert knows. The one thing every expert knows correctly is that none of the experts can predict. Some will be right but that's because everybody's predicting different things. Of course some will be right. Then later they'll say well look I was right. I was the best predictor for three years so let me handle your money. You think they'll be the best predictor for the next three years? Usually not. Usually not because it's chance right.

So the mental health professionals look a lot like financial professionals which is I'll bet if you were yourself a mental health professional you would think that your own industry was... prove me wrong. Find somebody who works currently in that industry and have a private conversation with them because I did that with somebody in the financial advice industry and they told me flat out now the advice I give my clients I would never use for myself. Flat out. No not even shaded a little bit. No it's basically a fake industry.

All right. I know you don't want me to but there's something we need to say about Ye. Can you handle it a little bit? All right let me give you a little walk in the park of the history of Ye. I want to see if you can put all of these little pieces together into anything that feels like a pattern. See if you can find the pattern.

Okay so you remember when Ye interrupted Taylor Swift's award-winning thing and he got up there and instead of letting the award ceremony progress in this normal way he got up there and said probably the main thing you should not say in that situation which is somebody else should have won this award. Right? Would you agree that whatever else it was and you'll have lots of descriptions of how bad it was would you agree that he shouldn't have said it? Can you all give me that it was something that very specifically you should not have said even if he believed it you shouldn't say it out loud in public? Yeah so that happened.

Do you know what Ye was criticized for when he was just doing music? Do you remember what the biggest criticism of Ye was when he was just the artist doing music? Anybody remember? Because it's weird that you forgot. His songs were insanely misogynistic said his critics. Insanely misogynistic. Now who thinks that in the last 20 years you could be a public personality and talk about women and you could get away with it? So he said a lot of the stuff you're not supposed to say about women right. So he did that. And really like who goes after women like and just insults them and makes money on it? Well rappers. So he comes from a world in which saying the thing you're not supposed to say is exactly your job right.

Do you think rappers say what is socially acceptable? I feel like the essence of rap is saying things that would be uncomfortable for the people in charge. Things about women, things about their feelings about police, maybe praising bad behavior, illegal behavior that sort of thing. So rap by its nature is artists who are saying the most dangerous things that you're specifically not supposed to say right. So that's part of the context.

Well let's move on. Do you remember of course you do when Ye said he likes Trump. Wasn't that the one thing that a black man couldn't say in public at the time without huge consequences? It was. It was like the most dangerous thing a black man could say and he said it over and over again.

Do you remember when Ye went on I forget which show you'll tell me which show because I'm blanking and he said that slavery the history of slavery he said there were so many more slaves than there were masters at the time. He said that slavery looks like a choice. Remember what happened when he said slavery looks like a choice? He basically insulted all of Black America and much of White America and everybody else who might be supportive and he said the worst thing you could say about Black America. Like I don't think you could have said a worse thing about Black Americans. And did he say I'm only talking about some black people when he said that? When he was being misogynistic did he say whoa whoa whoa hold on no I'm not talking about women. I'm not talking about you know to use his word I'm talking about some individual women who have behaviors I don't like. Did he ever clarify that? I don't think so.

When he talked about black people must have treated it like a choice to slavery did he say some of those black people must have treated it like a choice? He didn't. He treated it like black people are like a group that act together. Very offensive wouldn't you say? Very offensive. Yeah it was the worst thing you could say in that situation.

When Ye made a turn toward being super religious and suddenly he wasn't that edgy rapper he was the super religious guy did it ever occur to you that that was like the most dangerous thing that Ye could do? One of the most dangerous things you could have done say two years ago was to come out as super Christian and conservative, family conservative religious. It was just about the most dangerous thing you could say in public if you think about it right. Especially from where he was coming from. Most dangerous thing you could say.

When he wore the White Lives Matter shirt with Candace Owens wasn't that the worst thing you could say in public about that time? It was the most controversial worst thing you could say. Yeah. Now did he say that some white lives matter and some do not? I don't remember. I think he treated white people like they were like one unit but we're not right. We're not one unit. There must be some white people that don't matter you know like serial killers and stuff but yet he treated us all like we're just one unit. Very unfair.

So he's treated women as if they're like one thing. Very offensive. Treated white people like one unit. Treated black people like they're one group. And then he got to the Jews are trying to stop him from being successful. Wow third rail. It's the worst thing you could say in public and expect to get away with it right. The worst thing you could say and he treated all Jews like it's like one group of people when in fact we knew that just some specific individuals he had a problem with. Very unacceptable treating an entire group as if they're one thing.

And then he took it up a level. He said I see good things about Hitler. Well that's something you can't say. What is the worst thing you could say? The one thing nobody can say in public. Hitler has some good sides. You can't say that. It's the thing you can't say even with free speech you can't say that. Foreign. And then he teamed up with Nick Fuentes and said you know Nick's great. Oh you can't do that. You cannot do that. And they started to work with Milo Yiannopoulos. You can't do that. No no you cannot say there's anything good with Milo because if you do it would feel like you're supporting pedophiles wouldn't it even though Milo is not accused of pedophilia. He is accused of something that has a different word but people confuse with pedophilia. So he I think he was talking about older teens which technically is not pedo but everybody sees it that way right. So I'm not making that distinction. I'm saying that Ye would know that people won't make that distinction. So associating with Milo put him in that sort of little supportive of a pedophile.

Do you know what you can't say? You can never say anything anything this even slightly supportive of the pedophile. So what do you say about Balenciaga when they're accused of being a pedophile organization? He defended them. Not the specific photo shoot but he defended the company that is not defending itself from pedophilia. They're not defending themselves. Let me say it again. Balenciaga never said how the photo shoot happened and therefore explained why they're not really guilty. They never did. But Ye defended the group that is accused of being pedophile friendly.

Do you know what you can't do? You can't do that. But he did it. Here's the pattern. Have you picked it up yet? You see the pattern? And then another hint came when I watched some more of the like behind the scenes of Ye's visit to Alex Jones and you see Nick Fuentes defending Ye's treatment of quote the Jews as like one group of people he has trouble with. And here's what Fuentes said we're okay treating every other group as one group. To which I said hey that's so wrong in ways I can't quite articulate. No no Nick Fuentes you racist you. But your examples are pretty good but that's wrong. That's so wrong. Except it makes you think doesn't it? Makes you think.

Now if anybody's new to my live stream I don't like Hitler completely. Like I hate his little mustache. I hate the lint in his pocket. He's all bad because I know what to say in public right. It's not hard.

Now here's the question that's going to blow your head off. You ready? You ready for this? Let's accept that Ye has some mental conditions. Maybe he's bipolar maybe something else. Do you think that any of the mental conditions that Ye is accused of would make him incapable of knowing what things to say to make him popular with the public and what things to say that would make him very unpopular with the public? Do you think he can't tell the difference between saying the right thing and saying the thing that will absolutely get you in trouble? Do you think he can't tell the difference? Somebody says yes that if it's mania if he's in the mania phase he can't tell the difference. I would think the mania phase means he's not afraid of consequences. I don't think it makes you unable to see what's right in front of you.

So here's my take. It seems deeply unlikely that he was surprised by any of the reactions to any of the things I mentioned. Do you think he was surprised by any of it? Now do you think he would know exactly what to say and do if you wanted to get back into the good graces of the public? Of course. Of course we all do. It's not like it's a hard question. It would be the easiest question in the world. Just say you didn't mean any of those things. Apologize for it. You know do some good works for people you might have hurt. That sort of thing.

Now what about the perfectly valid complaint from the Jewish community that Ye's rhetoric puts an extra risk on Jews? True or false? The way Ye talks makes them feel uncomfortable and adds some extra risk to their life. True. True. Absolutely true.

Now let's fold in Nick Fuentes and compare that to everybody else talking about anything. Do you think that the way the Democrats talk about me puts me at greater risk of literally being killed? Yes or no? Is the way they talk about me on social media every day it will be a risk of physical danger? Yes. Yes absolutely. Have you ever seen me say that they need to stop doing that because it's putting me in physical danger? Have I ever said that you need to stop using your free speech because it puts me in physical danger? I've noted that it does. I've noted that it does but that's different than saying they need to stop it right? Not once. No.

When Ye said White Lives Matter was he putting himself at greater physical risk? Of course he was. Of course he was. And also the people who supported him. Did he put Candace Owens at greater physical risk by associating her with that message? Yes. Yes. I mean she already puts herself at great risk by the way. Candace Owens is one of the bravest people in the public realm. Like she is brave. Like you gotta give her that.

So look at the big picture. Number one how many of you saw the behind the scenes video of Ye preparing his little mask and his routine for Alex Jones? If you watched him preparing for it you saw somebody who did not look crazy at all. And as he was talking about wearing the mask he was completely aware that that would make it impossible to ignore. He went full rock star full Trump and he said all right if you're gonna cut me off from social media I will become impossible to ignore and then I'm going to go on there and say the most outrageous thing anybody ever said and let's see what happens.

Here's another clue. Ali Alexander who's also associated now with Ye he said on that video specifically that they were breaking the Overton window. Maybe saying it wrong but the Overton window is basically the idea that you could keep your critics or your enemies in a state of continuous spinning if you keep doing one more outrageous thing after another. They can't settle on the last outrageous thing. They have to keep up with you. So sort of what Trump did. All of his individual statements that could have ended anybody else didn't end Trump because he was already on to the next statement and that was controversial too and then the next one right.

So now that you know the following things maybe you didn't put together. Number one Kanye and his group are specifically and overtly talking about the Overton window. Everything they're doing supports that theory of operation. There's no way I could possibly believe that Ye was not completely aware of all of the reactions he would get from beginning to end. Everybody would know the reaction to everything.

Here's what I think he's up to and he might pull it off. I don't know. Now and again if you're not if you're new to my live stream I'm not supporting Ye and I said this yesterday I think Ye is making himself unlikable and I accept that. So I don't like him. I would like him if he said nice things about the Jewish community. I would like him more. I would like him if he said things that I could embrace without being embarrassed. I'd like that. That'd be cool.

But here's what I think he's up to. I think he's breaking your brain and he's going to be very close to succeeding because you can't tell where that breaking point is because he's bending us and we're bending and bending and bending. It's not until you see the whole portfolio of what he's done in the last few years that you see he is intentionally finding the most challenging thing you can hold in your mind and then making you deal with it.

Now I've said before that Ye is not somebody who just creates art. He is living art. Everything he does pushes or challenges you to reconsider the way you were thinking of things right. Everything we're watching is a challenge to the old way you were thinking from the very beginning of what is an award show right. The most basic thing that nobody would question is what is an award show? Well it's where somebody gets an award and they say thank you and everybody claps. Then Ye said how about this isn't award show. How about not. How about I go up there and make it a different show. And then he did.

So if you look at the whole portfolio it looks a lot less crazy and it looks like an artist who is breaking all of our expectations about what artists can do who can say what and he has broken maybe the most important barrier that we have for getting together which is we're not allowed to say what we think. We're not allowed to say what we think and until we're allowed to say what we think we'll never come together. The country can never come together if we can't talk and say what we actually think as bad as it is right because lots of times we think pretty ugly things. Ye is just breaking all of the rules. He's just showing you you can say everything you want to say as long as you're willing to pay for it with everything.

Now let's double back to something that you really don't see coming. You ready for this? When Ye said that there were so many more slaves than white people who were trying to control them back in slavery. He said that it looked like a choice. And then all historians and especially black historians said whoa whoa whoa whoa that was no choice. You know the group that had the weapons would have just slaughtered us right.

Here's what I think Ye would have said speculating based on everything that he's done so far. I think he'd say right how does that affect my point right? They would have slaughtered them and they also probably would have ended up winning. They might have lost 90 percent of their numbers but they could have ended up winning them because they had the numbers. You know they just had to attack where their weapons were and get the weapons and then you know. So if you ask me Ye's original controversial point that the slaves could have rebelled if they wanted to badly enough he basically proved by destroying his own career to win back freedom of speech for himself. He basically demonstrated what he thought the slaves at the time should have done which is risk everything for their freedom. And reasonable people said no you don't risk everything for your freedom. You risk what makes sense. And Ye was saying no for freedom you'd risk everything.

And so when it came to his own freedom in the United States can he say whatever he wants to say no matter how ugly it is? Can a man who feels and this is his own feeling this is not my interpretation can a man who feels that some identifiable group seems to be ganging up on him can he say it? Yeah. Does he have the right to be wrong? Does he have the right to say something that could put people at risk? He's fighting for that right and what he traded for that right was everything. He traded everything for it.

Now if you don't think this is one of the greatest shows you've ever seen you're not seeing the pattern. If you look at any individual thing he says we're supposed to be outraged by it you're part of the performance right. You're not an observer you're part of the performance. Your outrage is part of the act.

So what he says Hitler has some good things about him. I say God damn you Ye. God damn you. I'm sorry I don't want to use the lord's name in vain. I know some of you get triggered by that and I didn't mean to do it. So I don't support him because that's his message. His message to me is don't support me right because he basically said things I can't agree with and I'm not going to agree with so I don't support him. But watching this play out? Amazing.

Now you want some more mind benders? I got more. Do you think he can make his money back? Do you think he could ever make his money back? Well one of his projects which is still live unless something's changed recently is you know he had intended to build communities that were designed communities so they'd be better places to live and would solve a number of problems that our current social situation doesn't solve. Now he's only been messing around with the prototypes but you know the size of that market is bigger than all the things he's ever done right. The potential size of that is basically Elon Musk sized opportunity and nobody's really competing because other people who want to build homes are just going to be home builders and they would build something boring that didn't move your soul. Ye potentially could bring what he's brought to other fields to the housing field and make you excited about it and then suddenly every community he builds or licenses he makes a hundred million dollars and you know a hundred million here a hundred million there it adds up over time. You know he could be the richest man in America in 20 years and it's because he's entered the market that would allow that to happen and he's the right person for it. He's the right person for the market.

So here's the other possibility. You know that in my opinion Trump has become not viable. Is there any way that Ye could come back from all of this? Could he come back from the things he said? Could he get back into the public good graces? Nobody else could but he could. He could yep. Now I'm not going to predict that he will. I'm just going to say I look at his talent stack and I look at what you would call his mental illness or whatever's going on there and I don't see that's going to stop him. It doesn't look like that would stop him. He knows exactly what it would take right. Don't you think he knows what to take? Because he knew exactly what would get him in trouble. You don't think there was any surprise about that. He knew exactly what he was doing. You don't think he knows exactly how to get out of it?

Let me tell you how. Do you think I could model it? Do you think I could give you a thing he could say that would just totally get him out of trouble? I think he could. Here's me modeling it. You know I think that my comments about the Jews were out of place and I was acting on my feelings at the time. However the bigger issue is can people say what they feel when they feel it and still survive in this country? Because we can't have a country if I can't say something out of anger and still have a job. And I'd like that for you as well. I want us all to live in a country at work and say what we want to say and we'll figure out a way to be okay with it. We shouldn't be doing things that make it too dangerous for other people but be aware that all speech comes with a little bit of danger right. It's built into free speech. You can't make it go away. You've watched me say every possible thing that you're not supposed to say and so far I'm still alive. Free speech won't kill you. I just proved it.

Now can we stop saying bad things about each other as a group? Can you join me and let's not treat black people like they're one group or white people like they're one group or Jews like they're one group or Christians like they're one group. Can we just stop doing it? Because I'll go first. I'll go first.

Now if he said that and you said to yourself huh he actually sounds like he means it. He actually I could hear his actual regret and the way he phrased it. He's giving us a reason why it happened. He was upset about his situation. He's told you what he's going to do to correct it and then he tried to bring you to a higher ground where we all don't have that problem and we don't have that kind of problem with each other and we figure out how to talk while being a little bit offensive because that's just how talking works.

Now you don't think he could sell that? Again I'm not predicting he will try to do anything like that because he's hard to predict right. You can't really predict him. If you could predict him he wouldn't be Ye. But he could.

Now when I said that did you say to myself oh my God that will never work. Nobody would ever accept that. Have you ever heard the well there's a couple of analogies that come to mind. If you've ever worked at a restaurant you know or any retail you know that the following thing is true. The best way to get a repeat customer is have a bad experience for your customer and then they complained and then you fix it. If for example you go to a restaurant and something was wrong and they comp you the meal your odds of eating there again are pretty high. You know if it's a good restaurant you just have one little issue right. So yeah we do have a soft spot as humans for people who admit their mistake and try to fix it. In fact that's some of our favorite people. A lot of movies and books are about somebody who is flawed and then the process of the movie they redeem themselves right. The redemption story is one of our strongest most built-in narratives that run our lives.

So if he could turn into the reformed person who becomes the story of who you don't want to be or becomes the reason that we should value free speech or something like that you can imagine he could make it work. You can imagine that.

Does it blow your mind that he's a black man who says White Lives Matter and he's working with Nick Fuentes and Milo? Doesn't it look like he chose he chose his group to be the most offensive group he possibly could? And Ali Alexander was one of the organizers of the January 6 event. He's not charged with anything because he didn't do anything illegal but still his name is associated with that right. Doesn't it look like he intentionally chose the least publicly acceptable people?

Here's the weird thing. They're not all the same person. So he's got person of color, person who's gay, person who's the most extreme right-wing person. I mean he's really got a little pirate ship. It's a pirate ship. His little pirate ship. Do you know what makes people comfortable? People get comfortable when they see that you're the captain of a pirate ship because they go well he's not going to kick me out for being weird because I'm just a pirate like all the pirates are different. One has one leg one has one leg but we're all just pirates you know. The pirate ship metaphor or analogy I forget which it would be a good way to bring the country together wouldn't it? You know instead of saying you're a bad pirate and I'm a good pirate how about just saying you know we're all kind of pirates but we're on the same ship.

That's what I liked about Trump. You know of course his critics say oh you're a big racist but he had no problem hanging out with literally anybody right. If you look at the people Trump has personally associated with it was everybody. No limits at all. I love that. The people I'm worried about is people hanging around with people who look like them. I'm not comfortable with that.

What is one piece? I don't know what that is. Are you giving him the benefit of the doubt to talk about Ye? Am I giving Ye the benefit of the doubt and assuming his intentions are good? Yes yes I am doing that explicitly. I'm assuming that Ye's intentions are good because I also believe that his religious faith is real. Does anybody doubt his religious faith? That's a lot of work. I mean if that's a trick it's a lot of work to put into a trick. No I think he's completely sincere about the religion stuff which suggests he's sincere about creating a better world. He's just doing it in a way that we've never seen anybody do anything unless you think Trump did.

All right. Now is there any way that I can say what I've said without getting smeared by the left? I think they'll probably drag me now won't they? Do you think I'll get dragged by this afternoon? Because I think the media is desperately looking for somebody who makes a mistake of defending Ye right. Like the classic trap is the first person who looks like they're defending him is going to get dragged in so that you know not to defend him. That's how it's played.

Now I don't know if I can avoid that by saying I dislike him because he is going out of his way to make all of us dislike him. So I accept. I accept his message.

All right. Yeah the locals is our pirate ship. That Scott your struggles are uncertain comp. Okay. My comp. Oh my struggle. I got it. Got it. Took me a while to put that together.

He's trying to destroy his brand. I don't know. I mean he's already done that as something wrong. There's an article already about me. Is there already a piece on me yet? Does anybody seem to have a piece on me yet? Probably there should be one by the end of today. That would be the normal thing but I think they'll probably just keep Ye end of the news.

Now here's the other possibility. Do you think Ye would run as a Democrat or a Republican because he hasn't said right. What do you think? I feel like he's going to have to start his own party isn't he? Because he already said he's the birthday party or something. Yeah he's a birthday party. I don't know what you have to do to officially be a new political party but who would Ye take more votes away from Democrats or Republicans? Who would Ye take more votes away from? You think he could get black votes after he said White Lives Matter? I think you're right. I think he could pull more away from the Democrats which would make him the Joe Manchin of presidential candidates. In other words Joe Manchin just by being the one person or one of two who can go back and forth on an issue gets to decide all our legislation. So maybe Ye could run for office and know that his involvement would change the result. What do you think the Democrats would be willing to offer him to stop running? They might fund his Ye community just to get him out of the race. I don't know. It could be interesting.

But ladies and gentlemen that is all I have for now for the public presentation. So I'm going to say good night to or good day. Good day to YouTube and Spotify and Rumble and I'm going to talk to the locals people privately. Bye for now.

good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of civilization that at least half of the country knows about the other half well they seem to be in their own little world and we have no connection to them but if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that can only be accomplished with illegal drugs but without the illegal drugs all you need is a copper mugger a glass of tanker cell system canteen jogger philaska vessel of any kind filler with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure it's the dopamine the other day the the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous set but happens now go um Scott would you be so kind to start the You.

Tube stream about 30 seconds early mean as in before the start time I I don't know about that is that because you missed a simultaneous it because the recorded version has it all is it when you live stream you miss the first 30 seconds is that what happens I'll look into that maybe there's something I can do yeah how can I start before I start exactly perfectly good question oh excuse the ads oh it's the ads right so if you if you don't have the the You.

Tube Red you have to look at it at uh okay I got it got it okay we'll see what we can do well here's some good news potentially I always like to follow Machiavelli's underbelly good Twitter account um yeah it was a fun interesting positive things happening in the technology so there's some scientists at the University of Birmingham in the UK and they figured out how to use laser light treatment to improve your memory by up to 25 percent your short-term memory anyway they don't know if it lasts but they think they could also use this light treatment for ADHD now apparently it's non-invasive so I don't know exactly where do they Shine the Light it's a laser and it's non-invasive but what exactly is a non-invasive laser but do you shoot a laser in somebody's eyes I guess so probably but as you know if Trump supported this it would be reported as Trump favors injecting bleach into people's eyes to improve their ADHD that would that would be the story well you know it would you know it would so maybe that'll be cool maybe they can treat ADHD now let me tell you my experience with light as a professional writer I put great care into the physical environment in which I try to write a huge difference I like to have both of my feet on the ground not crossed if I cross my legs or put my feet up right to sleep I also have to have a you have the right kind of distraction and and physical environment but the light I've discovered is one of the biggest factors if you get the light right you can write for a long time if you get the light wrong that puts you in a whole different physical mode so I do think that it could be that we will unlock all kinds of benefits with light treatments or bleach uh there's also a potential obesity treatment in which they can give you some kind of a compound that will change the nature of the fat in your body so that it still does whatever fat needs to do in your body that's good for you but it doesn't get bigger what do you think of that I feel like there could be a an accidental impact of that do you know how much I would eat if I if I didn't get fat the only thing that keeps me from eating all day long is that I don't want to be overweight if I could eat and not get fat oh my God I'd just be eating and pooping all day long I'd be as happy as hell well it doesn't take much to keep me happy I guess how many of you saw the prankster who talked at the Austin city council meeting and he did what I call Embrace and amplify oh thank you John sunlight is good uh so this prankster pretends to be a real person and he's wearing a like a communist communism shirt Pro communism and he gets up and he does a whole thing about how Elon must take you over Twitter is the worst thing but I wasn't sure it was a prank until some other people confirmed it because the reality and parody are so similar so here's the first thing that the pranksters had that made me say huh that does sound ridiculous but not more ridiculous than what actual real people say so see if you think this is way too ridiculous or something that an average person if you stopped him on the street might actually say like an actual thing a person would say he said that Elon Musk taking over Twitter is worse than the Holocaust and it might even be worse than January 6th now is that perfect that's some good writing first of all that's really good writing for a prank Elon taking over Twitter is worse than the Holocaust and it might even be worse than January 6th implying the January 6th was worse than the Holocaust and the thing is I I think he finished his entire thing without people catching God that it was a prank now would you like to end wokeness forever how about doing more of this suppose every single public hearing had one of these but you kept getting closer and closer to reality so they really actually couldn't tell if you were kidding like they just couldn't tell what would happen what would happen if you took all of the arguments on the right and you started making them even stronger than they are but what would happen if every time uh every time some medicine came out the Democrats thought was a good idea you accused them of drinking bleach I recommending it just just do everything they do and act like you're serious about it it would just make everything ridiculous the entire world would just become absurd overnight but it would be funny uh here's something we learned so there was there's a project called open AI That was supposed to be I guess uh non-profit and the the idea was they had developed Ai and I don't know it'd be good for the world I guess there's some profit element to it now but uh we learned from Elon Musk that open AI had access to Twitter data to train it had access to Twitter data now I think that means more than just reading what you and I read I think that means the API meaning that you could get directly into the data stream of Twitter with permission you know that would be an entirely legitimate thing to do but are you comfortable with AI knowing everything about your Twitter experience if AI learned about me only from Twitter could it reproduce my personality if it only knew my Twitter experience it could reproduce it but it would be the and the attenuated version Twitter me is not me you know that right my Twitter personality is not like my base personality in the same way if I talk to a child that's not my base personality that's how I modified to talk to a child if I give a if I give a talk in front of a big crowd in public that's not my actual personality that's my modified personality for an audience this isn't my real personality this is my modified personality for the purpose of doing the live stream right they're all versions of me so they're not dishonest because they're the real version of me modified to the the purpose but there's no you know there's no version it's me but what if AI said well I'm gonna I've got like 10 000 tweets and likes and stuff from this guy a reproduce them based on what I know from Twitter be a little dangerous wouldn't it because it wouldn't necessarily know that's not me that is my performance version of me yeah speaking of the performance version of people that's a theme we might get to a little bit but uh you know you wonder if a musk actually blocked open AI temporarily anyway blocked AI from using Twitter data which seems like the right move until you know a little bit more about the ramifications of that I like that and I also like the transparency because musk told us what it was and what it is and flagged it as a potential problem without any specifics and if you don't know what the specific problem is then pausing to find out is exactly the right thing to do so good on him I saw I saw somebody on the left criticize musk for trying things and then reversing them and I think you mentioned three or four things that he tried at Twitter and then quickly reversed as if that's him doing a bad job how much how much more wrong could you be about something in public to imagine that rapidly trying things in software because it's a software-based company rapidly trying things seeing how they do how they're accepted rapidly adjusting right in front of you and there's somebody who says that's failing like oh that's a bad job you tried these things and then you reversed them now if a hundred percent of everything you tried got reversed well then you'd have some kind of a point but if nine out of 10 things he tries gets reversed you do not have a point because that's the game is to get one out of ten that works and keep it and not you try you know ten things to get one that works that'd be about what I would expect you know one out of ten would be a good pretty good actually if you got one out of ten um so The Washington Post is accusing MSNBC of racism for firing one of their black journalists is there anything else to say about that story and like I could put more words around it but I feel like that's like the seed of a story I can just give you the seed and then it goes to your head and it blossoms into the whole story like I don't I don't need to add anything do I the the left is accusing the left of being racist I don't know it's kind of perfect but you also knew that that's where I had to go right one once your model of the world is that as groups against groups all you see is groups and everything is one group against another so the left has to eat itself in the long run that the the inevitable evolution of the left is asked to eat itself has to break into atomized parts and start fighting the right does not necessarily have that fate why why does the right have more protection against devolving into a bunch of partisans it's the Constitution because people because what whatever you believe as long as you're pretty serious about the Constitution yeah you're on my side I'm not a conservative but if you're if you're real serious about the Constitution you're on my side that's the beginning of the end of my uh analysis of your value if you're not on the side of the Constitution well you're you're a risk to me that's a risk you I'm not saying you're a bad person but it's a risk to me but if you're on the same side as the Constitution you and I can live together and I can disagree with you about all kinds of stuff won't make any difference to me in fact I might even enjoy the disagreement might add to my you know the the flavor of my life but yeah you're you're fine with me as long as we agree on the Constitution let's see I wonder if there are any uh people associated with the right who don't like the Constitution because that would be weird in fact if you were if you were a political figure on the right and you were anti-constitution that would be pretty much the end of you wouldn't it well next story uh Trump is uh in favor of ignoring the Constitution so he uh he posted on true social um he said quote do you throw the presidential election results of 2020 out and declare the rightful winner which would be him of course in his view or do you have a new election a massive fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules regulations and articles even those found in the Constitution Trump wrote and we're done and we're done and we're done now here's the only way that this could be okay the only way I could understand this as being okay is if Trump is simply trying to bring some attention to himself by saying the most outrageous thing you could say and getting everybody talking about it but unfortunately the left or fortunately maybe the left has decided that he will get no attention and so is Fox News and I think breitbart's sort of on that page now so uh Trump's ability to say outrageous things and get attention is really diminished really diminished so if it successfully got him all kinds of attention you could actually argue maybe it's working in his favor in a weird kind of way because he's done that before that would be a standard play but does it look like that here's what I wonder I'm I'm watching uh Elon Musk and also yay attract all the energy and I think Trump is left the sort of energy energy poor there's not enough energy going in his Direction and so he's got a top Elon Musk the laptop story and whatever the hell yeah is doing today to get to get to Greater level of outrageousness than our Baseline because the Baseline is so outrageous now that getting above that takes a little work Barry I'm going to get rid of you just for being an there's no other reason you're just an goodbye um poor Barry Barry we will miss you no we won't we won't miss you Barry so in my opinion uh Trump has very little uh little room to operate because to get more outrageous than what is the Baseline there's just no room left you have to you have to go all the way to maybe we should throw out the Constitution now you can't defend Trump after he says maybe you throw out the Constitution because that was the setup right the setup was hey January 6 is about Trump wanting to overthrow the country and be a dictator to which all of us said no that's not what that was that that's totally not what that was that was the opposite that literally the opposite the protesters wanted to make sure the system worked the way it was designed and they weren't sure that that was happening so they asked for a delay to make sure that the constitution is working the way it was designed that's all but the the left created this trap that said you know it really was trying to overthrow the Constitution and the country and then Trump walks right into the Trap by saying after all of this after all the energy I wasted explaining that January 6 wasn't what you thought it was it's a it's an OP by the left and it is but all that all that wasted time defending that you know the the at least the Trump supporters were on the right side and he just threw them under the bus because all of those January 6 supporters are going to be tarred by this opinion because people the left is going to say well Trump just said directly let's get rid of the Constitution right he said it directly if it helps him ignore the Constitution and now they're going to Tar all those you know well-meaning Patriots who really were just trying to make it a better country and all of them are going to be tarred by this they should drop him like the hottest Rock of all time I I don't see any way he comes back from this he's just so done right that's my I had one red line would you agree well I mean I wouldn't support somebody who was actually literally racist I wouldn't do that that's a red line but the other red line is you have to be on the side of the Constitution is that asking a lot to be on the side of the Constitution yeah fentanyl is a single issue vote but you know I would still allow that somebody's in the contest but really I don't know uh so I think Trump um is as done as you could possibly be which is interesting because who's left now what happens what happens if Trump is not viable but nobody primaries him because nobody else is viable because Trump will take him out it's gonna get real interesting Scott you did not read the entire quote I don't need to I don't need to read the entire quote if you're saying that the entire quote would soften it or change its meaning that's irrelevant because the way it will be presented is the way I just presented it so if you think that I'm ignoring the truth the truth isn't part of the topic the the topic I'm talking about is what will people think and feel about it the truth is somewhat irrelevant you know what was he really thinking or what did he technically say not relevant just not relevant because he walked into a trap and then he sprung about himself what am I supposed to ignore that Junior Coltrane Scott is a real Sam Harris in all caps I can't even tell if you're real or a troll all right um Biden has a new tweet with a photo of him in the Oval Office working and uh I noticed he's got a comic strip that's framed on the table behind them now as you know I was not a supporter of President Biden but I was willing to based on which comic that was it was a little blurry but some people did some research and they determined that the comic was Hagar the Horrible Hagar the Horrible I I was willing to let it go when I found out that Biden was a huge liar all of his career said a lot of things about himself that weren't true I was annoyed when he pushed the fine people hoax and and he was running for office to end The Lying by being a huge liar I was concerned about his dealings with or or Hunters dealings with foreign countries and I didn't like what he did with his inflation and some of his work policies but I was willing to I was willing to maybe Overlook some of those things for the unity of the country but he has a Hagar the Horrible comic behind his desk I I can't I can't ignore that I can't ignore that yeah no he didn't go full pickles if he had gone full pickles which is another comic uh that that would be too far but Hagar Hagar I don't know if I can forgive that let's talk about Twitter because that's what we do every day so uh Elon Musk has confirmed something I was speculating about you said The more Twitter improves its signal to noise ratio the less relevant conventional news becomes and they followed up with another tweet he said the intelligence of this hive mind meaning Twitter will improve significantly as signal to noise effective cross-linking of tweets and speed of tweets all improve so um remember I said that the thing you have to be cautious about when you're trying to predict whether Elon Musk will be successful with Twitter is it the thing you have to understand is he's not trying to make it as successful as Twitter 1.0 he's not tweaking Twitter 1.0 he's probably going to create something that does payments replaces old news you know becomes the way you communicate instead of texting is probably replaces Tick Tock who knows what else will replace yeah he's thinking big and so he is literally thinking of replacing uh the news but you can't replace the news if Twitter is nothing but partisans battling so if the only thing that if the only change that musk makes is to make sure that all uh controversial claims are connected to some context that the other side would like you to see he has beaten the TV and other news business completely because they can't match that the the other news entities don't really even try to add context if he did and it looks like Twitter's the perfect tool to add context if he does there is no reason to read the news anymore so here's a little uh here's a little confirmation for the musk opinion my normal routine for the last several years is I get up and I look at CNN and I look at Fox News and follow some other stories in other places and then I'll also check all the tweets to see what the tweeters are saying about the news and then I have a good picture to make my comments for the day since since musk took over about half of the days that I come on here I have not checked to CNN or Fox News because Twitter has the news and then has all the reactions to the news and a little bit more more and more is going to have the context that was not in the news why would I check the news when I can get the news plus the context plus the comments the news is already obsolete I mean the regular news uh here's a ten dollar question which government intelligence agencies you think Epstein worked for um well I don't think it was necessarily our government do you assume Epstein worked for our government exclusively I would imagine he had some connections to a variety of high-level people and more than one country all right so I I don't assume it's some American only situation all right uh here's the most important thing you need to know about uh Elon Musk buying Twitter you know the movie The The Matrix and the the star of The Matrix the character was Neo Neo Neo so when Neo enters the Matrix uh what you should know is that was completely different that Elon entering Twitter because when Neo entered the Matrix Neo has only 75 percent of the letters that are also in the word Elon so that's a pretty big difference it's like a 25 difference in their names everything else is roughly the same as Neo entering the Matrix because both Twitter and the Matrix have the same purpose the purpose of Twitter is great and artificial reality such that you don't know what your the real reality is you're living in that's literally The Matrix movie The Matrix movie is that you believe you're in one reality but the Matrix holds you in another that's literally what what Twitter is doing literally they're doing that now usually I make fun of people comparing things to a movie but this is not comparing to this is same as right I mean not actually uh connected by tubes and living in a in a vat but we might be we might be for all we know here's the other funny Twitter related thing I you know musk has got to be the best Tweeter since Trump and maybe he's in Better but look at how he handled this situation with a tweet and the Tweet comes from Elon musk's ex-wife Justine Musk and Justine musk on December 2nd tweeted so I would like to note that she began her tweet with the word so I wonder what the rest of the Tweet will be will it be insightful analysis hmm what comes after the word so uh good facts and logic oh no let's read on let's read on and find out if we can guess what comes after the word so does anybody want to take a guess if you I'd like to attest your intelligence here ah do you know what comes after the word so oh yes ridiculous straw man a a version of reality that nobody holds so that you can insult it I wonder if that will will come after the word so well let me read on and find out so let me get this straight I'm going to give you another quiz what follows the phrase let me get this straight go what follows let me get this straight would it be getting it straight or would it be intentionally distorting into something that is definitely the opposite of getting it straight which one do you predict because you're smart look at you go look at you go well you know just when I think there's a limit to your intelligence you surpass it again I am amazed I don't even need to give you the news anymore do I I could just come here and you tell me the news without even knowing what it is that's how good you are all right let me try it again you think I can't do this uh you fill in the blank the Pope had a comment about Ukraine what is it go what what will the pope say about Ukraine that this hasn't happened lately he is against violence he's in favor of peace a year like Geniuses you are freaking geniuses wow you know the news before it happens all right let me ask you another uh there's a gigantic Blockbuster story in which everything the left has been doing for years has been uncovered and now their shame and embarrassment will eat them alive as all of their supporters and followers find out about this Blockbuster laptop from Hell being suppressed story on Twitter okay what what happens next what happens next how did you know how did you guess this how did you guess that this story would be so completely suppressed that it would be as if it never happened how did you know that the only people that would hear the Blockbuster story are the people who already knew it was true and not a single other person will hear it unless it's paired with some explanation of why it's not really what you think it is well you guessed pretty good because it turns out the New York Times ignored it Washington Post ignored it CNN ignored it I think MSNBC ignored it the entire left closed ranks and disappeared the story exactly like you thought they would now what happens to my You.

Tube feed here I am on You.

Tube this big Channel do you think You.

Tube is letting this go out to all the people who need to hear it I would be highly doubtful that my You.

Tube feed is completely non-suppressed and that like it's it's being treated like every other feed Maybe I mean anything's possible but everything we know about everything suggests that this is being suppressed right now would you agree how many of you would say yeah you're definitely being suppressed there's no question about it yeah your geniuses every one of you are geniuses that's true yeah all right so here's what uh Justine continues to say he she said so let me get this straight we are now supposed to step into the quote Marketplace of ideas to to debate plus discuss if Hitler behaved poorly or if women should be quote raped and locked in cages because these are conversations the culture needs to be having so what would Justine musk's ex-husband Elon Musk how would he reply to a a a tweet like that well the way he did reply was with one emoji and I'll try to do the emoji face so you can see it if if you're if you're listening to this and not watching I just did a clever and humorous impression of an emoji with a wrinkled up uh mouth expression as in what the yeah if there were a caption to that emoji it would be what the it was perfect it was perfect any any word he had added to that emoji would have decreased you know the impact or the or the Perfection of it it was just perfect yeah I think it was smirking face it's just like well what do you say to that there's literally no comment about it that could have helped it was just it just has to sit there on its own just it is what it is but with one emoji uh Elon Musk described his entire marriage experience in ways which every man completely understood uh message received got it expanding now in my mind from one emoji to whoa whoa this is a good story wow now continue to expand to explain the entire marital dynamic ending in divorce got it got it so that's nobody's ever said more with one emoji you could piece together their entire history and and can you imagine their arguments in person come on just just hold it in your head just imagine that he had to hear that every day how many days in a row do you have to listen to that before you before you say I think marriage isn't for me I'm just going to knock up a bunch of women and have kids I don't think this marriage thing you know by Design I don't think it's a good system it's not well engineered imagine being the most storied engineer in American history although he's technically even not an engineer he just happens to be the best one uh that would be the storied engineer and that's the system that you have to put yourself into do you think you do you think Elon Musk looks at the institution and system of marriage and says to himself now that's a good system if I were going to engineer a system for society it would look just like that no I don't think so um it's just a is your mind blown away by the fact that the New York Times didn't cover the Twitter expose like what does that do to your head I mean it does tell you everything you suspected was true not just about this right I mean such a strong signal that literally everything you suspected was true about everything just about everything it was all true in some in some form um so every time the conservatives have this uh I got you this time feeling what always happens we've been through this before right ah we got you this time now that the truth has come out watch what happens when the people on the left learn the truth it never happens does it there's just it just bounces off and I was I was looking at you know how will the Democrats try to put a little uh illusion wall around this to protect themselves and I saw this uh tweet by was it David Corn um oh yeah so he tweeted at Elon before the expose came out he said uh in preparation please read my original piece on the hunter Biden laptop now according to Corn the big issue all right so ignore all the smaller issues because that that's not really what's good here's the big issue because you don't want to you don't want to be left on this little issue about maybe Democrats or getting people kicked off of Twitter and using it to affect the light that's the small stuff so don't get lost in the weeds because here's the big story I don't know if you noticed but the hunter laptop the big story as corn tells us the big issue was that the New York Post and Giuliani used the existence of the laptop and iffy materials on it to advance Russian disinformation concocted to hurt Biden and help Trump as of a few days ago a prominent Democrat was pushing that the laptop was not Russian disinformation but supportive of oh my God present time pressle time no no it wasn't Russian disinformation did anybody tell you that no it was information that supported the disinformation of the the Russians and that disinformation I will not specify because there are no real examples to prove my point but I'd like to throw Russian disinformation into it to confuse it so that my dom Democrats who read this will think well maybe that Republican story was wrong because there's something about still Russian disinformation in it and by the way it wasn't manafort proof that the Russian collusion happened it's the manafort play it's the manafort play oh did you say that uh Trump was cleared of Russian collusion hahaha obviously the opposite happened because manafort who is not Trump uh was guilty of a Russia related crime that wasn't specifically related to the main accusations so good try on that and then uh have you seen the latest narrative so all the left pundits got the memo and it's always funny when the people who realize that they're all using the same talking points when they do the little compilation so you can see that they're all little you know talking has to say the same thing so the new talking point is that people who are tweeting about the Twitter Revelations are doing quote PR for one of the richest men in the world so apparently they did some research and they decided that since Democrats don't like rich people that you could just uh you could just dismiss musk for being a rich person and that why should anybody be doing PR for a rich person and that's that's what they have and they're a whole bunch of tweets they have the exact wording PR for one of the richest men in the world they don't just they don't say it a different way they actually use the exact sentence lots and lots of people so I wonder I wonder you know when that gets put out you know where did they all get that they all get it from the same Source right are they copying each other or do they actually do they literally have a talking points memo they do don't they isn't there literally a talking point memo of some sort that they know where to look for I think so all right um so Michael uh Tracy tweets about uh so uh Noel is it Noel the author the old author whatever he was so the guy who was in charge of uh Twitter's executive who was in charge of I guess Banning people and other things um he had a public event and he said that the decision to ban Trump after January 6 was impelled in part by the trauma that he and other content monitors batteries were experiencing so there's some there's some confession Joel Roth thank you there's some confession that it wasn't purely a free speech or even a financial decision it was how they felt it was literally how they felt now it wasn't the only factor I think you know Michael Tracy might be you know giving it a little more attention than it deserves it wasn't the only Factor but but the fact that how they felt was any part of the decision is repeat it after me exactly what you thought it was it's exactly what you suspected have we all just turned into Geniuses or or are people just doing exactly what you expect all the time now like nobody does anything except exactly what you expected it's like that that's all there is has anybody done anything unexpected in a while well yes there is somebody doing something unexpected do you think I'll be talking about that person oh maybe Maybe you know I think the problem with the Twitter content people is that they believe their own propaganda don't you don't you think the biggest problem that the left has with mental health is that they literally believe themselves and I don't even know how many people who say things on the left you know the notable people who are creating the narrative I have no idea how much they believe out of their own narrative but I know the people who consume their narrative buy into it and you'd have to think it would give you mental health problems wouldn't you because think about the narrative that the left is given and then the all the counter factuals or the you know the The observed things that debunk their their View and somehow they can incorporate all the counter factuals and still go along it's like serious you know implied or is sort of a an imposed mental illness it's like a mental illness that's imposed on them from the outside by the narratives I wonder if you could have narrative poisoning yeah I think I'm going to invent a term narrative poisoning if the narrative which is not true causes you to have a physical reaction which is true then you have narrative poisoning right narrative poisoning is it which is different from just believing something that's not true believing something that's not true is sort of you know daily life we're all believing stuff that's not true but if you buy into a narrative and it makes you sick you have narrative poisoning you don't have you don't you're not sick because of reality because that's not what a narrative is narrative poisoning so I think that the Twitter Executives actually had narrative poisoning and they were they were acting out partly on mental health issues let me let me now uh excuse the behavior of all the Twitter professionals they were they were operating on a PTSD which they gave themselves it was self-induced PTSD they had narrative poisoning TDS and they acted on their Mental Health they acted to reduce their mental health problems and they used Twitter like it was a pharmaceutical drug that if they tweaked it just right they could reduce their mental health issues and so they did so they did how much do you love that they use Twitter like a Pharma Pharmaceutical to improve their Mental Health that actually happened right there's nothing about that sentence that is hyperbole that actually literally observably happened they they've admitted they had you know mental distress they told you what they did about it and and in an out in an analogy sense they use Twitter to cure their mental distress like you would use a pharmaceutical and it had it had side effects and the side effects were unexpected all right Dr.

Scott Barry Kaufman who's also a interesting fellow on Twitter I recommend them um he said today this this was I'm going to disagree with him a little bit here but this was a good contribution to the conversation he said people are blaming yay's behavior on his bipolar diagnosis I'd like to point out that when you see histrionic and antagonist antagonistic anti-social behaviors they are much better predicted by narcissistic personality disorder than bipolar disorder see here for the correlation Matrix and no pun intended he shows a matrix of course acid Matrix of uh um different I know different behaviors and what it means you know and they correlate Etc and if you see a chart a matrix of mental let's say mental illness into in 2022 what do you what do you think about it it just all looks like astrology when I see a complicated medical scientific chart my immediate point is that it's not an immediate impression is well that's not true it's just and it doesn't even matter what the topic is like it could have been you know any any part of mental or physical health if I've seen that that complicated chart I would have just assumed it wasn't true so that's where we are now we're at the point where anything medical medical experts say and they put a big scientific chart with data I just say well that's probably not true I'm not going to ignore it because you know when experts say something you don't want to ignore it it might be true but the credibility is you know below zero now do you think that the mental health Community the the experts do you think they can tell the difference between these various diagnoses do you think that they if you had 10 mental health professionals and they all diagnosed EA do you think they'd all agree no they would not they would not agree do you know why because it's not a science it's not even close it's complete it's a it's a Pharma industry created thing that's sort of trying to look like science but mostly is and scams and liars and bad ideas yeah so now just to be clear I'm sure there are some valuable elements of the mental health profession I'm sure of it but do you think I could figure out which ones are the real ones and which ones are the complete of course not because I have no ability to do that do you know who else can't do that the people in the industry because if they could tell what was in their own industry they'd all have the same opinion but they can't that's why they have different opinions and if the experts in their own industry can't tell what's real and what isn't why should you believe them let's say you go to a financial expert Financial expert says here that here's how you should invest you say thank you good information I'm going to get a second opinion though so you go to a second Financial expert and they say do something different you go hmm two different opinions okay I better check with another one let's say you check with a bunch of financial people and you get you get advice that's on both directions some say sell your stock some say hold your stock some say get out of stocks and do something different what would your conclusion be would your conclusion be that experts know more than you do and and you should follow their advice because their advice was different what you should conclude is that the experts don't know any more than you do about what a stock is going to do in the future which is true that's been well demonstrated so when the experts don't agree your conclusion should be that's not really a science it's not really it's just a scam industry the financial advice industry is a complete scam industry that for whatever reason well not whatever reason because everybody who treats it like it's real gets a lot of money for doing it right the the TV shows that have are the yeah mostly the news but the the shows that have um commercials from financial institutions that would be the same as like a hair growth solutions is that they know isn't real right you don't think that the experts on CNBC know that the experts they have on don't know anything of course they know that do you know why the experts on CNBC know that the experts they have on don't have useful information because that's what every expert knows the one thing every expert knows correctly is that none of the experts can predict some will be right but that's because everybody's predicting different things of course some will be right then later they'll say well look I was right for I was the best predictor for three years so let me handle your money you think they'll be the best predictor for the next three years usually not usually not because it's chance right so the mental health professionals to be look a lot like Financial professionals which is I'll bet if you were if I if you were yourself a mental health professional you would think that your own your own industry was prove me wrong find somebody who works currently in that industry and have a private conversation with them because I did that with somebody in the financial advice industry and they told me flat out now the advice I give my clients I would never use for myself flat out no not even shaded a little bit no it's it's basically a fake industry all right um uh I know you don't want me to but there's something we need to say about yay can you handle it a little bit all right let me give you a little uh walk in the park of the history of yang I want to see if if you can put all of these little pieces together into anything that feels like a pattern see if you can find the pattern okay so you remember when uh yay interrupted Taylor Swift's uh award-winning thing and he got up there and instead of letting the award ceremony progress in this normal way he got up there and said probably the main thing you should not say in that situation which is somebody else should have won this award right would you agree that whatever else it was and you'll have lots of descriptions of how bad it was would you agree that he shouldn't have said it can you all give me that it was something that very specifically you should not have said even if he believed it you shouldn't say it out loud in public yeah so that happened do you know what uh yea was criticized for when he was just doing music do you remember what the biggest criticism of va was when he was just the artist doing music anybody remember because it's weird that you forgot his songs were insanely misogynistic said his critics insanely misogynistic now who thinks that in the last 20 years you could be a public personality and talk about women and you could get away with it so he said a lot of the stuff you're not supposed to say about women right so he did that and and really like who who goes after women like and just insults them and makes money on it well rappers so he comes from a world in which saying the thing you're not supposed to say is exactly your job right do you think rappers say what is socially acceptable I I feel like the essence of rap is saying things that would be uncomfortable for the people in charge things about you know women things about their feelings about police maybe um praising bad behavior illegal behavior that sort of thing so rap by his nature is artists who are saying the most dangerous things that you're specifically not supposed to say right so that's part of the context well let's move on do you remember of course you do when yay said he likes Trump wasn't that the one thing that a black man couldn't say in public at the time without huge consequences it was it was like the most dangerous thing a black man could say and he said it over and over again do you remember when yay went on uh I forget which show you'll tell me which show because I'm blanking and he said that slavery the history of slavery he said there were so many more slaves than there were masters of the time he said that slavery looks like a choice remember what happened when he said slavery looks like a choice he basically insulted all of Black America and much of White America and everybody else who might be supportive and he said the worst thing you could say about Black America like I don't think you could have said a worse thing about Black Americans and did he say I'm only talking about some black people when he said that when he was being misogynistic did he say whoa whoa whoa hold on no I'm not talking about women I'm not talking about you know to use his word I'm talking about some individual women who have behaviors I don't like did he ever clarify that I don't think so when he talked about black people must have been a choice to slavery did he say some of those black people must have treated it like a choice he didn't he treated like black people or like a group that act together very offensive wouldn't you say very offensive yeah it was the worst thing you could say in that situation um when yay made a turn toward being super religious and suddenly he wasn't that that edgy rapper he was the Super religious guy did it ever occur to you that that was like the most dangerous thing that yay could do one of the most dangerous things you could have done say two years ago was the command as super Christian and conservative family conservative religious it was just about the most dangerous thing you could say in public if you think about it right especially from where he was coming from most dangerous thing you could say when he wore the White lives matter shirt with Candace Owens wasn't that the worst thing you could say in public about that time it was the most controversial worst thing you could say yeah now did he say that um some white lives matter and some do not I don't remember I think he treated white people like they were like one unit but we're not right we're not one unit there must be some white people that don't matter you know like serial killers and stuff but yet he treated us all like we're just one unit very unfair so he's treated women as if they're like one thing very offensive treated um he treated white people like one unit he treated black people like they're one group um and then he got to uh the Jews are trying to stop him from being successful wow third rail it's the worst thing you could say in public and expect to get away with it right the worst thing you could say and he treated all Jews like it's like one group of people when in fact we knew that just some specific individuals he had a problem with very unacceptable treating an entire group as if they're one thing and then he took it up a level you said I see good things about Hitler well that's something you can't say what is the worst thing you could say the one thing nobody can say in public Hitler has some good sides you can't say that it's the thing you can't say even with free speech you can't say that foreign and then he teamed up with Nick Fuentes and said you know Nick's great oh you can't do that you cannot do that and they started to work with Milo yiannopoulos you can't do that no no you cannot say there's anything good with Milo because if you do it would feel like you're supporting pedophiles wouldn't it even though Milo is not accused of pedophilia he is accused of something that has a different word but people confuse with pedophilia so he I think he was talking about older older teens which technically is not Peto but everybody sees it that way right so I'm not I'm not making that distinction I'm saying that yea would know that people won't make that distinction so associating with Milo put him in that sort of little supportive of a pedophile do you know what you can't say you can never say anything anything this even slightly supportive of the pedophile so what do you say about Balenciaga when they're accused of being a pedophile organization he defended them not the specific photo shoot but he defended the company that is not defending itself from pedophilia they're not defending themselves let me say it again balenciago never said how the photo shoot happened and therefore explained why they're not really guilty they never did but yea defended the group that is accused of being pedophile friendly do you know what you can't do you can't do that but he did it here's the pattern have you picked it up yet you see the pattern and then another hint came when I watched some more of the uh like behind the scenes of yay's visit to Alex Jones and you see Nick Fuentes defending yay's treatment of quote the Jews as like one group of people he has trouble with and here's what Fuente said we're okay treating every other group as one group to which I said hey that's so wrong in ways I can't quite articulate no no Nick Fuentes you racist you but your examples are pretty good but that's wrong that's so wrong except makes you think doesn't it makes you think now if anybody's new to my live stream I don't like Hitler completely like I I hate his little mustache I ate the lint in his pocket he's all bad because I know what to say in public right it's not hard now here's here's the question that's going to blow your head off you ready you ready for this let's accept that yay has some mental conditions maybe he's you know maybe he's uh you know bipolar maybe something else do you think that any of the mental conditions that yay is accused of would make him incapable of knowing what things to say to make him popular with the public and what things to say that would make him very unpopular with the public do you think he can't tell the difference between saying the right thing and saying the thing that will absolutely get you in trouble do you think you can't tell the difference somebody says yes that if it's Mania if he's in the menu phase he can't tell the difference I would think the Mania phase means he's not afraid of uh consequences I don't think it makes you unable to see what's right in front of you so here's here's my take it seems deeply unlikely that he was surprised by any of the reactions to any of the things I mentioned do you think he was surprised by any of it now do you think he would know exactly what to say and do if you wanted to get back into the good graces of the public of course of course we all do it's not it's not like it's a hard question it would be the easiest question in the world just say you didn't mean any of those things apologize for it you know do some good works for people you might have hurt that sort of thing now what about the uh the perfectly valid complaint from the Jewish community that yea's rhetoric puts an extra risk on Jews true or false the way yea talks makes them feel uncomfortable and adds some extra risk to their life true true absolutely true now let's let's go fold Nick Fuentes and compare that to everybody else talking about anything do you think that the way the Democrats talk about me puts me at greater risk of literally being killed yes or no is the way they talk about me on social media every day it will be a risk of physical danger yes yes absolutely have you ever seen me say that they need to stop doing that because it's putting me in physical danger have I ever said that you need to stop using your free speech because it puts me in physical danger I've noted that it does I've noted that it does but that's different than saying they need to stop it right not once no um when when yay said White lives matter was he putting himself at greater physical risk of course he was of course he was and also the people who supported him did he put Candace Owens at greater physical Risk by you know associating her with that message yes yes I mean she already puts herself at Great Risk by the way Candace Owens is one of the bravest people you know in the public realm like she is brave like you gotta you gotta give her that um so look at the big picture number one how many of you saw the behind the scenes video of yay preparing his little mask uh and his routine for Alex Jones if you watched him preparing for it you saw somebody who did not look crazy at all and as he was talking about wearing the mask he was completely aware that that would make it impossible to ignore he went full rock star full Trump and he said all right if you're gonna if you're gonna cut me off from social media I will become impossible to ignore and then I'm going to go on there and say the most outrageous thing anybody ever said and let's let's see what happens here's another clue uh Ali Alexander who's also Associated now with with yay um he said on that video specifically that they were breaking the Overton window maybe saying it wrong but the Overton window is basically the idea that you could keep your um your critics or your enemies in a state of continuous spinning if you keep doing one more outrageous thing after another they can't settle on the last outrageous thing they have to keep up with you so sort of what Trump did all of his individual uh you know statements that could have ended anybody else didn't end Trump because he was already on to the next statement and that was controversial too and then the next one right so now that you know the following things the baby you didn't put together number one Kanye and his group are specifically and overtly talking about the Overton window everything they're doing supports that theory of operation there's no way I could possibly believe that yay was not completely aware of all of the reactions he would get from beginning to end every everybody would know the reaction to everybody here's what I think he's up to and you might pull it off I don't know now and and again if you're not if you're new to my live stream I'm not supporting yay and I said this yesterday I think yay is making himself unlikable and I accept that so I don't like him I would like him if he said nice things about the Jewish community I would like him more I would like him if he were you know said things that I could Embrace without being embarrassed I'd like that 'd be cool but uh here's what I think he's up to I think he's breaking your brain and he's going to be very close to succeeding because you you can't tell where that breaking point is because he's bending us and we're bending and bending and bending it's not until you see the whole portfolio of what he's done in the last few years that you see he is intentionally finding the most challenging thing you can hold in your mind and then making you deal with now I've said before that yea is not somebody who just creates art he is living art everything he does pushes pushes or challenges you to reconsider the way you were thinking of things right everything we're watching is a challenge to the old way you were thinking from from the very beginning of what is an award show right the most basic thing that nobody would question is what is an award show well it's where somebody gets an award and they say thank you and everybody claps then yay said how about this isn't award show how about not how about I go up there and make it a different show and then he did so if you look at the whole portfolio it looks a lot less crazy and it looks like an artist who is breaking all of our expectations about what artists can do who can say what and he has broken maybe the most important barrier that we have for getting together which is we're not allowed to say what we think we're not allowed to say what we think and until we're allowed to say what we think we'll never come together the country can never come together if we can't talk and say what we actually think as bad as it is right because lots of times we think pretty ugly things yea is just breaking all of the rules he's just showing you you can say everything you want to say as long as you're willing to pay for it with everything now let's double back to something that you really don't see coming you ready for this when ye said that there were so many more slaves than white people who were trying to control them back in slavery you said that it looked like a choice and then all historians and especially black historians said whoa whoa whoa whoa that was no choice you know the the group that had the weapons would have just you know slaughtered us right here's what I think yay would have said speculating based on all everything that he's done so far I think he'd say right how does that affect my point right they would have slaughtered them and they also probably would have ended up winning they might have lost 90 percent of their numbers but they could have ended up winning them because they had the numbers you know they they just had to attack where their weapons were and get the weapons and then you know so if you ask me yea's original controversial point that the slaves could have rebelled if they wanted to badly enough he basically proved by destroying his own career to win back freedom of speech for himself he basically demonstrated what he thought the slaves at the time should have done which is Risk Everything for their freedom and reasonable people said no you don't risk everything for your freedom you risk what makes sense and the a was saying no for Freedom you'd Risk Everything and so when it came to his own freedom in the United States can he say whatever he wants to say no matter how ugly it is can a man who feels and this is his own feeling this is not my interpretation can a man who feels that some identifiable group seems to be ganging up on him can he say it yeah does he have the right to be wrong does he have the right to say something that could put people at risk he's fighting for that right and what he traded for that right was everything he traded everything for it now if you don't think this is one of the greatest shows you've ever seen you're not seeing the pattern if you look at any individual thing he says we're supposed to be outraged by it you're part of the performance right you're not an observer you're part of the performance your outrage is part of the ACT so what he says Hitler has some good things about him I say God damn you yay God damn you I'm sorry I don't want to use the lord's name in vain I know some of you get triggered by that and I didn't mean to do it so I don't support him because that's his message his message to me is don't support me right because he basically said things I can't agree with and I'm not going to agree with so I don't support him but watching watching this play out amazing now you want some more mind benders I got more do you think he can make his money back do you think he could ever make his money back well one of his projects which is still live unless something's changed recently is you know he had intended to build uh communities that were designed communities so they'd be better places to live and would solve you know a number of problems that our current social situation doesn't solve now uh he's only been messing around with the prototypes but you know the size of that market is bigger than all the things he's ever done right the potential size of that is is basically Elon Musk sized opportunity and nobody's nobody's really competing because other people who want to build homes are just going to be home builders and they would build something boring that didn't move your soul yay potentially potentially could bring what he's brought to other fields to the housing field and make you excited about it and then suddenly every Community bills or license he makes a hundred million dollars and you know 100 million here 100 million there it adds up over time you know he could be the richest man in America in 20 years and it's because he's entered the market that would allow that to happen and he's the right person for IT he's the right person for the market so here's the other possibility you know that in my opinion Trump has become um not viable is there any way that yay could come back from all of this could he come back from the things he said could he get back into the public good graces nobody else could but he could he could yep now I'm not going to predict that they will I'm just going to say I look at his talent stack and I look at what what you would call his mental illness or whatever's going on there and I don't see that's going to stop him it doesn't look like that would stop him he knows exactly what it would take right don't you think he knows what to take because because he knew exactly what would get him in trouble you don't think there was any surprise about that he knew exactly what he was doing you don't think he knows exactly how to get out of it let me tell you how do you think I could model it do you think I could give you a thing he could say that would just totally get him out of the out of trouble I think he could here's me modeling it you know um I think that my comments about the Jews were out of place and I was acting on my feelings at the time however the bigger issue is can people say what they feel when they feel it and still survive in this country because we can't have a country if I can't say something out of anger and still have a job and I'd like that for you as well I want us all to live in the country at work and say what we want to say and we'll figure out a way to be okay with it we shouldn't be doing things that make it too dangerous for other people but be aware that all speech comes with a little bit of danger right it's it's built into Free Speech you can't make it go away you've watched me say every possible thing that you're not supposed to say and so far I'm still alive Free Speech won't kill you I just proved it now can we stop saying bad things about each other as a group can you join me and let's not treat black people like their one group or white people like their one group or Jews like their one group or Christians like they're one group can we just stop doing it because I'll go first I'll go first now if he said that and you said to yourself huh he actually sounds like he means it he actually I I could hear his actual regret and the way he phrase it he's giving us a reason why it happened he was upset about his situation he's he's told you what he's going to do to correct it and then he he tried to bring you to a higher ground where we all don't have that problem and we don't have that kind of problem with each other and we figure out how to talk while being a little bit offensive because that's just how talking works foreign now you don't think he could sell that again I'm not predicting he will try to do anything like that because he's hard to predict right you can't really predict him if you could predict him he wouldn't be gay but he could now when I said that did you say to myself oh my God that will never work nobody would ever accept that have you ever heard the uh well there's a couple of analogies that come to mind um if if you've ever worked at a restaurant you know or any retail you know that the following thing is true the best way to get a repeat customer is have a bad experience for your customer and then they complained and then you fix it if for example you go to a restaurant and something was wrong and they comp you the meal your odds of eating there again are pretty high you know if it's a good restaurant you just have one little issue right so yeah we do have a soft spot as humans for people who admit their mistake and try to fix it in fact that's some of our favorite people a lot of movies and books are about somebody who is flawed and then the process of the movie they redeem themselves right the the Redemption story is one of our strongest most built-in you know narratives that run our run our lives so if he could turn into the reformed person who becomes the the story of who you don't want to be or becomes the the reason that we should you know value Free Speech or something like that you can imagine he could make it work you can imagine that does it blow your mind that he's a black man who says white lives matter and he's working with Nick Fuentes and Milo doesn't it look like he chose he chose his group to be the most offensive group he possibly could and Ali Alexander was one of the organizers of the January 6 event he's not charged with anything because he didn't do anything illegal um but still his name is associated with that right doesn't it look like he intentionally chose the least publicly acceptable people here's the weird thing they're not all the same person so he's got you know person of color person who's gay person who's you know the the most extreme right-wing person I mean he's really got a little pirate yeah it's a pirate ship his little pirate ship do you know what makes people comfortable people get comfortable when they see that you're the captain of a pirate ship because they go well he's not going to kick me out for being weird because I'm just a pirate like all the Pirates are different one has one leg one has one leg but we're all just Pirates you know the the pirate ship um metaphor or analogy I forget which it would be a good way to bring the country together wouldn't it you know instead of saying you're a bad pirate and I'm a good pirate how about just saying you know we're all kind of pirates but we're on the same ship that's what I liked about Trump yeah you know of course his critics say oh you're a big racist but he had no problem hanging out with literally anybody right if you look at the people Trump has personally associated with it was everybody no limits at all I love that uh the the people I'm worried about is people hanging around with people who look like them I'm not comfortable with that what is one piece I don't know what that is uh are you giving him the benefit to talk about yay am I giving yay the benefit of a doubt and assuming his attentions are good uh yes yes I am doing that explicitly I'm assuming that yay's intentions are good because I also believe that his religious faith is real does anybody doubt his religious faith that's a lot of work I mean if that's a if that's a trick it's a lot of work to put into a trick no I think he's I think he's completely sincere about the religion stuff which suggests he's sincere about creating a better world he's just doing it in a way that we've never seen anybody do anything unless you think Trump did all right um now is there any way that I can say what I've said without getting smeared by the left I think they'll probably drag me now won't they do you think I'll get dragged by this afternoon because I think I think the media is desperately looking for somebody who makes a mistake of Defending yay right like the classic trap is the first person who looks like they're defending him is going to get dragged in so that you know not to defend him that's how it's played now I don't know if I can uh if I can avoid that by saying I dislike him because he is going out of his way to make all of us dislike him so I accept I accept his message all right uh yeah the locals is our pirate ship that Scott your struggles are uncertain comp okay um my comp oh my struggle I got it got it took me a while to put that together um he's trying to destroy his brand I don't know I mean he's already done that as something wrong there's an article already about me is there already had peace on me yet does anybody seem to have peace on me yet probably there should be one by the end of today that would be the normal thing but I think they'll probably just keep yay end of the news now here's here's the other possibility do you think yay would run as a Democrat or a Republican because he hasn't said right what do you think I feel like he's going to have to start his own party isn't he because he already said he's the birthday party or something yeah he's a birthday party I don't know what you have to do to officially be a new political party but but uh who would yay take more votes away from Democrats are Republicans who would yay take more votes away from you think he could get black votes after you said White lives matter I think you're right I think he I think he could pull more away from the Democrats which would make him the Joe manchin of presidential candidates in other words Joe manchin just by being the one person or one of two who can go back and forth on an issue guests to decide all our legislation so maybe yay could run for office and know that his his involvement would change the the result what do you think the Democrats would be willing to offer him to stop running they might fund his yay community just to get him out of the race I don't know it could be interesting but ladies and gentlemen that is all I have for now for the Public Presentation so I'm going to say uh good night to two or good day good day to You.

Tube and Spotify and Rumble and I'm going to talk to the locals people privately bye for now

good morning everybody and welcome

to the highlight of civilization

that at least half of the country knows

about

the other half well they seem to be in

their own little world

and we have no connection to them

but if you'd like to take your

experience up to levels that can only be

accomplished with illegal drugs

but without the illegal drugs all you

need is a copper mugger a glass of

tanker cell system canteen jogger

philaska vessel of any kind filler with

your favorite liquid I like coffee

and join me now for the unparalleled

pleasure it's the dopamine the other day

the the thing that makes everything

better it's called the simultaneous set

but happens now go

um

Scott would you be so kind to start the

YouTube stream about 30 seconds early

mean as in

before the start time

I I don't know about that is that

because you missed a simultaneous it

because the recorded version has it all

is it when you live stream you miss the

first 30 seconds

is that what happens

I'll look into that maybe there's

something I can do

yeah how can I start before I start

exactly perfectly good question

oh excuse the ads oh it's the ads right

so if you if you don't have the the

YouTube Red you have to look at it at uh

okay I got it

got it okay we'll see what we can do

well here's some good news potentially

I always like to follow Machiavelli's

underbelly good Twitter account

um yeah it was a fun interesting

positive things happening in the

technology so there's some scientists at

the University of Birmingham in the UK

and they figured out how to use laser

light treatment

to improve your memory by up to 25

percent

your short-term memory anyway they don't

know if it lasts but they think they

could also use this light treatment

for ADHD

now apparently it's non-invasive

so I don't know exactly where do they

Shine the Light

it's a laser and it's non-invasive

but what exactly is a non-invasive laser

but do you shoot a laser in somebody's

eyes I guess so probably but as you know

if Trump

supported this it would be reported as

Trump favors

injecting bleach into people's eyes

to improve their ADHD

that would that would be the story

well you know it would you know it would

so maybe that'll be cool maybe they can

treat ADHD now let me tell you my

experience with light

as a professional writer I put great

care

into the physical environment in which I

try to write a huge difference I like to

have both of my feet on the ground

not crossed if I cross my legs or put my

feet up right to sleep I also have to

have a you have the right kind of

distraction and and physical environment

but the light

I've discovered is one of the biggest

factors

if you get the light right you can write

for a long time

if you get the light wrong that puts you

in a whole different

physical mode so I do think that it

could be that we will unlock all kinds

of benefits with light treatments

or bleach uh there's also a potential

obesity treatment in which they can give

you some kind of a compound

that will change the nature of the fat

in your body

so that it still does whatever fat needs

to do in your body that's good for you

but it doesn't get bigger

what do you think of that

I feel like there could be a

an accidental

impact of that

do you know how much I would eat if I if

I didn't get fat

the only thing that keeps me from eating

all day long is that I don't want to be

overweight if I could eat and not get

fat

oh my God

I'd just be eating and pooping all day

long I'd be as happy as hell

well it doesn't take much to keep me

happy I guess

how many of you saw the prankster

who talked at the Austin city council

meeting and he did what I call Embrace

and amplify

oh thank you John sunlight is good

uh so this prankster pretends to be a

real person

and he's wearing a like a communist

communism shirt Pro communism

and he gets up and he does a whole thing

about

how Elon must take you over Twitter is

the worst thing

but I wasn't sure it was a prank

until some other people confirmed it

because the reality and parody are so

similar so here's the first thing that

the pranksters had that made me say

huh

that does sound ridiculous

but not more ridiculous than what actual

real people say

so see if you think this is way too

ridiculous or something that an average

person if you stopped him on the street

might actually say like an actual thing

a person would say

he said that Elon Musk taking over

Twitter is worse than the Holocaust and

it might even be worse than January 6th

now is that perfect

that's some good writing first of all

that's really good writing for a prank

Elon taking over Twitter is worse than

the Holocaust and it might even be worse

than January 6th implying the January

6th was worse than the Holocaust

and the thing is I I think he finished

his entire thing without people catching

God that it was a prank

now

would you like to end wokeness forever

how about doing more of this

suppose every single public hearing had

one of these

but you kept getting closer and closer

to reality so they really actually

couldn't tell if you were kidding like

they just couldn't tell what would

happen

what would happen if you took all of the

arguments on the right and you started

making them even stronger than they are

but what would happen if every time uh

every time some medicine came out the

Democrats thought was a good idea you

accused them of drinking bleach I

recommending it just just do everything

they do and act like you're serious

about it it would just make everything

ridiculous the entire world would just

become absurd overnight

but it would be funny

uh here's something we learned so there

was there's a project called open AI

That was supposed to be I guess uh

non-profit and the the idea was they had

developed Ai and I don't know it'd be

good for the world I guess there's some

profit element to it now but

uh we learned from Elon Musk that open

AI had access to Twitter data to train

it

had access to Twitter data now I think

that means more than just reading what

you and I read I think that means the

API

meaning that you could get directly into

the data stream of Twitter with

permission you know that would be an

entirely legitimate thing to do but are

you comfortable with AI

knowing everything about your Twitter

experience

if AI learned about me only from Twitter

could it reproduce my personality

if it only knew my Twitter experience

it could reproduce it but it would be

the and the attenuated version

Twitter me is not me you know that right

my Twitter personality is not like my

base personality in the same way if I

talk to a child

that's not my base personality that's

how I modified to talk to a child if I

give a

if I give a talk in front of a big crowd

in public

that's not my actual personality

that's my modified personality for an

audience

this isn't my real personality this is

my modified personality for the purpose

of doing the live stream right they're

all versions of me so they're not

dishonest because they're the real

version of me modified to the the

purpose but there's no you know there's

no version it's me but what if AI said

well I'm gonna I've got like 10 000

tweets and likes and stuff from this guy

a reproduce them based on what I know

from Twitter

be a little dangerous wouldn't it

because it wouldn't necessarily know

that's not me

that is my performance version of me

yeah

speaking of the performance version of

people

that's a theme we might get to a little

bit

but uh

you know you wonder if a musk actually

blocked open AI temporarily anyway

blocked AI

from using Twitter data which seems like

the right move until you know a little

bit more about the ramifications of that

I like that and I also like the

transparency

because musk told us what it was and

what it is and

flagged it as a potential problem

without any specifics and if you don't

know what the specific problem is then

pausing to find out is

exactly the right thing to do

so

good on him I saw I saw somebody on the

left criticize

musk for trying things and then

reversing them

and I think you mentioned three or four

things that he tried at Twitter and then

quickly reversed as if that's him doing

a bad job

how much how much more wrong could you

be about something in public

to imagine that rapidly trying things in

software because it's a software-based

company rapidly trying things seeing how

they do how they're accepted rapidly

adjusting right in front of you and

there's somebody who says that's failing

like oh that's a bad job you tried these

things and then you reversed them

now if a hundred percent of everything

you tried got reversed well then you'd

have some kind of a point

but if nine out of 10 things he tries

gets reversed you do not have a point

because that's the game is to get one

out of ten that works and keep it and

not you try you know ten things to get

one that works that'd be about what I

would expect you know one out of ten

would be a good pretty good actually if

you got one out of ten

um

so

The Washington Post

is accusing MSNBC of racism for firing

one of their black journalists

is there anything else to say about that

story

and like I could put more words around

it but I feel like that's like the seed

of a story I can just give you the seed

and then it goes to your head and it

blossoms into the whole story

like I don't I don't need to add

anything do I

the the left is accusing the left of

being racist

I don't know it's kind of perfect

but you also knew that that's where I

had to go right

one once your model of the world is that

as groups against groups all you see is

groups

and everything is one group against

another so the left has to eat itself in

the long run

that the the inevitable evolution of the

left is asked to eat itself has to break

into atomized parts and start fighting

the right does not necessarily have that

fate why

why does the right

have more protection against devolving

into a bunch of partisans

it's the Constitution

because people because what whatever you

believe as long as you're pretty serious

about the Constitution yeah you're on my

side

I'm not a conservative

but if you're if you're real serious

about the Constitution you're on my side

that's the beginning of the end of my uh

analysis of your value

if you're not on the side of the

Constitution well you're you're a risk

to me that's a risk you I'm not saying

you're a bad person but it's a risk to

me but if you're on the same side as the

Constitution you and I can live together

and I can disagree with you about all

kinds of stuff

won't make any difference to me in fact

I might even enjoy the disagreement

might add to my you know the the flavor

of my life

but yeah you're you're fine with me as

long as we agree on the Constitution

let's see I wonder if there are any uh

people associated with the right

who don't like the Constitution because

that would be weird

in fact if you were if you were a

political figure on the right

and you were anti-constitution

that would be pretty much the end of you

wouldn't it

well next story uh Trump is uh in favor

of ignoring the Constitution

so he uh he posted on true social

um he said quote do you throw the

presidential election results of 2020

out and declare the rightful winner

which would be him of course in his view

or do you have a new election a massive

fraud of this type and magnitude allows

for the termination of all rules

regulations and articles even those

found in the Constitution

Trump wrote

and we're done

and we're done

and we're done

now here's the only way that this could

be okay

the only way I could understand this as

being okay

is if Trump is simply trying to bring

some attention to himself by saying the

most outrageous thing you could say and

getting everybody talking about it

but unfortunately the left or

fortunately maybe the left has decided

that he will get no attention

and so is Fox News and I think

breitbart's sort of on that page now

so uh Trump's ability to say outrageous

things and get attention is really

diminished

really diminished so if it successfully

got him all kinds of attention

you could actually argue maybe it's

working in his favor in a weird kind of

way because he's done that before that

would be a standard play but does it

look like that

here's what I wonder

I'm I'm watching uh Elon Musk and also

yay

attract all the energy

and I think Trump is left the sort of

energy energy poor there's not enough

energy going in his Direction and so

he's got a top Elon Musk

the laptop story

and whatever the hell yeah is doing

today

to get to get to Greater level of

outrageousness than our Baseline because

the Baseline is so outrageous now

that getting above that takes a little

work

Barry I'm going to get rid of you just

for being an

there's no other reason you're just an

goodbye

um

poor Barry

Barry we will miss you

no we won't we won't miss you Barry

so in my opinion uh Trump has very

little uh

little room to operate because to get

more outrageous than what is the

Baseline there's just no room left you

have to you have to go all the way to

maybe we should throw out the

Constitution

now you can't defend Trump after he says

maybe you throw out the Constitution

because that was the setup right the

setup was hey January 6 is about Trump

wanting to overthrow the country and be

a dictator

to which all of us said no that's not

what that was that that's totally not

what that was that was the opposite that

literally the opposite the protesters

wanted to make sure the system

worked the way it was designed

and they weren't sure that that was

happening so they asked for a delay to

make sure that the constitution is

working the way it was designed

that's all

but the the left created this trap that

said you know it really was trying to

overthrow the Constitution and the

country

and then Trump walks right into the Trap

by saying after all of this

after all the energy I wasted

explaining that January 6 wasn't what

you thought it was it's a it's an OP by

the left and it is but all that all that

wasted time defending that you know the

the at least the Trump supporters were

on the right side and he just threw them

under the bus

because all of those January 6

supporters are going to be tarred by

this opinion

because people the left is going to say

well Trump just said directly let's get

rid of the Constitution

right he said it directly if it helps

him ignore the Constitution and now

they're going to Tar all those

you know well-meaning Patriots who

really were just trying to make it a

better country and all of them are going

to be tarred by this they should drop

him like the hottest Rock of all time

I I don't see any way he comes back from

this he's just so done right that's my I

had one red line

would you agree well I mean I wouldn't

support somebody who was actually

literally racist I wouldn't do that

that's a red line

but the other red line is you have to be

on the side of the Constitution

is that asking a lot to be on the side

of the Constitution yeah fentanyl is a

single issue vote

but

you know I would still allow that

somebody's in the contest

but really

I don't know uh so I think Trump

um is as done as you could possibly be

which is interesting because who's left

now what happens what happens if Trump

is not viable

but nobody primaries him

because nobody else is viable because

Trump will take him out

it's gonna get real interesting

Scott you did not read the entire quote

I don't need to I don't need to read the

entire quote if you're saying that the

entire quote would soften it or change

its meaning that's irrelevant because

the way it will be presented is the way

I just presented it

so if you think that I'm ignoring the

truth

the truth isn't part of the topic the

the topic I'm talking about is what will

people think and feel about it the truth

is somewhat irrelevant you know what was

he really thinking or what did he

technically say

not relevant just not relevant because

he walked into a trap and then he sprung

about himself what am I supposed to

ignore that

Junior Coltrane Scott is a real Sam

Harris

in all caps

I can't even tell if you're real

or a troll

all right

um Biden has a new tweet with a photo of

him in the Oval Office working

and uh I noticed he's got a comic strip

that's framed on the table behind them

now as you know I was not a supporter of

President Biden

but I was willing to based on which

comic that was it was a little blurry

but some people did some research and

they determined that the comic was Hagar

the Horrible

Hagar the Horrible

I I was willing to let it go when I

found out that Biden was a huge liar all

of his career

said a lot of things about himself that

weren't true

I was annoyed

when he pushed the fine people hoax and

and he was running for office to end The

Lying by being a huge liar I was

concerned about his

dealings with or or Hunters dealings

with foreign countries and I didn't like

what he did with his inflation and

some of his work policies but I was

willing to

I was willing to

maybe Overlook some of those things for

the unity of the country

but

he has a Hagar the Horrible comic behind

his desk

I I can't I can't ignore that

I can't ignore that yeah no he didn't go

full pickles if he had gone full pickles

which is another comic uh that that

would be too far but Hagar Hagar

I don't know if I can forgive that

let's talk about Twitter because

that's what we do every day

so uh Elon Musk has confirmed something

I was speculating about you said The

more Twitter improves its signal to

noise ratio the less relevant

conventional news becomes

and they followed up with another tweet

he said the intelligence of this hive

mind meaning Twitter will improve

significantly as signal to noise

effective cross-linking of tweets and

speed of tweets all improve

so

um

remember I said

that the thing you have to be cautious

about when you're trying to predict

whether Elon Musk will be successful

with Twitter

is it the thing you have to understand

is he's not trying to make it as

successful as Twitter 1.0 he's not

tweaking Twitter 1.0

he's probably going to create something

that does payments replaces old news you

know becomes the way you communicate

instead of texting

is probably replaces Tick Tock who knows

what else will replace

yeah he's thinking big and so he is

literally thinking of replacing uh the

news but you can't replace the news

if Twitter is nothing but partisans

battling

so if the only thing that if the only

change that musk makes

is to make sure that all uh

controversial claims are connected to

some context that the other side would

like you to see

he has beaten the TV and other news

business completely

because they can't match that

the the other news entities don't really

even try to add context

if he did and it looks like Twitter's

the perfect tool to add context if he

does

there is no reason to read the news

anymore so here's a little uh

here's a little confirmation for the

musk opinion

my normal routine for the last several

years is I get up and I look at CNN

and I look at Fox News and follow some

other stories in other places and then

I'll also check all the tweets to see

what the tweeters are saying about the

news and then I have a good picture to

make my comments for the day

since since musk took over

about half of the days that I come on

here I have not checked to CNN or Fox

News

because Twitter has the news

and then has all the reactions to the

news and a little bit more more and more

is going to have the context that was

not in the news

why would I check the news

when I can get the news plus the context

plus the comments

the news is already obsolete I mean the

regular news

uh here's a ten dollar question which

government intelligence agencies you

think Epstein worked for

um well I don't think it was necessarily

our government

do you assume Epstein worked for our

government exclusively

I would imagine he had some connections

to a variety of high-level people and

more than one country all right so I I

don't assume it's some American only

situation

all right uh here's the most important

thing you need to know about uh Elon

Musk buying Twitter

you know the movie The The Matrix and

the the star of The Matrix the character

was Neo

Neo Neo

so when Neo enters the Matrix

uh what you should know is that was

completely different

that Elon entering Twitter

because when Neo entered the Matrix

Neo has only 75 percent of the letters

that are also in the word Elon

so that's a pretty big difference it's

like a 25 difference in their names

everything else is roughly the same as

Neo entering the Matrix because both

Twitter and the Matrix have the same

purpose

the purpose of Twitter is great and

artificial reality such that you don't

know what your the real reality is

you're living in

that's literally The Matrix movie

The Matrix movie is that you believe

you're in one reality but the Matrix

holds you in another that's literally

what what Twitter is doing

literally they're doing that

now usually I make fun of people

comparing things to a movie but this is

not comparing to

this is same as right I mean not

actually uh

connected by tubes and living in a in a

vat

but we might be

we might be for all we know

here's the other funny Twitter related

thing I you know

musk has got to be the best Tweeter

since Trump and maybe he's in Better

but look at how he handled this

situation with a tweet

and the Tweet comes from Elon musk's

ex-wife Justine Musk

and Justine musk on December 2nd tweeted

so

I would like to note that she began her

tweet with the word so

I wonder what the rest of the Tweet will

be

will it be insightful analysis

hmm

what comes after the word so

uh good facts and logic

oh no let's read on let's read on and

find out if we can guess what comes

after the word so does anybody want to

take a guess if you I'd like to attest

your intelligence here

ah do you know what comes after the word

so

oh yes ridiculous straw man

a a version of reality that nobody holds

so that you can insult it I wonder if

that will will come after the word so

well let me read on and find out

so let me get this straight

I'm going to give you another quiz

what follows the phrase let me get this

straight go

what follows let me get this straight

would it be getting it straight

or would it be intentionally distorting

into something that is definitely the

opposite of getting it straight which

one do you predict because you're smart

look at you go

look at you go

well you know just when I think there's

a limit to your intelligence you surpass

it again I am amazed I don't even need

to give you the news anymore do I

I could just come here and you tell me

the news without even knowing what it is

that's how good you are

all right let me try it again you think

I can't do this

uh you fill in the blank

the Pope

had a comment about Ukraine what is it

go

what what will the pope say about

Ukraine that this hasn't happened lately

he is against violence

he's in favor of peace

a year like Geniuses you are freaking

geniuses

wow

you know the news before it happens

all right let me ask you another uh

there's a gigantic Blockbuster story in

which everything the left has been doing

for years has been uncovered and now

their shame and embarrassment will eat

them alive as all of their supporters

and followers find out about this

Blockbuster laptop from Hell being

suppressed story on Twitter

okay

what what happens next

what happens next

how did you know

how did you guess this

how did you guess that this story would

be so completely suppressed that it

would be as if it never happened

how did you know that the only people

that would hear the Blockbuster story

are the people who already knew

it was true

and not a single other person will hear

it unless it's paired with some

explanation of why it's not really what

you think it is

well you guessed pretty good because it

turns out the New York Times ignored it

Washington Post ignored it CNN ignored

it I think MSNBC ignored it the entire

left closed ranks

and disappeared the story

exactly like you thought they

would

now

what happens to my YouTube feed

here I am on YouTube this big Channel

do you think YouTube is letting this go

out to all the people who need to hear

it

I would be highly doubtful that my

YouTube feed

is completely non-suppressed and that

like it's it's being treated like every

other feed

Maybe

I mean anything's possible but

everything we know about everything

suggests that this is being suppressed

right now would you agree

how many of you would say yeah you're

definitely being suppressed there's no

question about it

yeah your geniuses every one of you are

geniuses that's true

yeah

all right so

here's what uh Justine continues to say

he she said so let me get this straight

we are now supposed to step into the

quote Marketplace of ideas to to debate

plus discuss if Hitler behaved poorly

or if women should be quote raped and

locked in cages

because these are conversations the

culture needs to be having

so what would Justine musk's ex-husband

Elon Musk how would he reply to a

a a tweet like that

well the way he did reply was with one

emoji

and I'll try to do the emoji face so you

can see it

if if you're if you're listening to this

and not watching I just did a clever and

humorous impression of an emoji with a

wrinkled up uh mouth expression as in

what the

yeah if there were a caption to that

emoji it would be

what the

it was perfect

it was perfect

any any word he had added to that emoji

would have decreased you know the impact

or the or the Perfection of it it was

just perfect yeah I think it was

smirking face it's just like well what

do you say to that

there's literally no comment about it

that could have helped

it was just it just has to sit there on

its own

just it is what it is

but with one emoji

uh Elon Musk described his entire

marriage experience

in ways which every man completely

understood

uh message received got it expanding now

in my mind from one emoji to whoa whoa

this is a good story wow now continue to

expand to explain the entire marital

dynamic

ending in divorce got it got it so

that's nobody's ever said more with one

emoji

you could piece together their entire

history

and and can you imagine their arguments

in person

come on just just hold it in your head

just imagine that he had to hear that

every day

how many days in a row do you have to

listen to that before you before you say

I think marriage isn't for me I'm just

going to knock up a bunch of women and

have kids I don't think this marriage

thing

you know by Design I don't think it's a

good system it's not well engineered

imagine being the most storied engineer

in American history although he's

technically even not an engineer he just

happens to be the best one uh that would

be the storied engineer and

that's the system that you have to put

yourself into

do you think you do you think Elon Musk

looks at the institution and system of

marriage and says to himself now that's

a good system

if I were going to engineer a system for

society it would look just like that

no I don't think so

um

it's just a is your mind blown away by

the fact that the New York Times didn't

cover the Twitter expose

like what does that do to your head

I mean it does tell you everything you

suspected was true not just about this

right I mean such a strong signal that

literally everything you suspected was

true about everything just about

everything it was all true

in some in some form

um

[Music]

so every time the conservatives have

this uh I got you this time feeling

what always happens

we've been through this before right ah

we got you this time now that the truth

has come out

watch what happens when the people on

the left learn the truth

it never happens does it

there's just it just bounces off

and I was I was looking at you know how

will the Democrats

try to put a little uh illusion wall

around this to protect themselves

and I saw this uh tweet by

was it David Corn

um oh yeah

so he tweeted at Elon before the expose

came out he said uh in preparation

please read my original piece on the

hunter Biden laptop now according to

Corn the big issue all right so ignore

all the smaller issues

because that that's not really what's

good here's the big issue because you

don't want to you don't want to be left

on this little issue about maybe

Democrats or getting people kicked off

of Twitter and using it to affect the

light that's the small stuff so don't

get lost in the weeds

because here's the big story I don't

know if you noticed

but the hunter laptop the big story as

corn tells us the big issue was that the

New York Post and Giuliani used the

existence of the laptop and iffy

materials on it to advance Russian

disinformation concocted to hurt Biden

and help Trump

as of a few days ago

a prominent Democrat

was pushing that

the laptop was not Russian

disinformation

but

supportive of

oh my God

present time

pressle time no no it wasn't Russian

disinformation did anybody tell you that

no it was information that supported the

disinformation of the the Russians and

that disinformation I will not specify

because there are no real examples to

prove my point but I'd like to throw

Russian disinformation into it to

confuse it so that my dom Democrats who

read this will think well maybe that

Republican story was wrong because

there's something about still Russian

disinformation in it and by the way it

wasn't manafort proof that the Russian

collusion happened

it's the manafort play

it's the manafort play

oh did you say that uh Trump was cleared

of Russian collusion hahaha

obviously the opposite happened because

manafort who is not Trump uh was guilty

of a Russia related crime

that wasn't specifically related to the

main accusations

so good try on that

and then uh have you seen the latest

narrative so all the left pundits got

the memo and it's always funny when the

people who realize that they're all

using the same talking points when they

do the little compilation so you can see

that they're all little you know talking

has to say the same thing so the new

talking point is that people who are

tweeting about the Twitter Revelations

are doing quote PR for one of the

richest men in the world

so apparently they did some research

and they decided that since Democrats

don't like rich people

that you could just uh you could just

dismiss musk for being a rich person

and that why should anybody be doing PR

for a rich person and that's that's what

they have and they're a whole bunch of

tweets they have the exact wording PR

for one of the richest men in the world

they don't just they don't say it a

different way they actually use the

exact

sentence lots and lots of people

so I wonder

I wonder you know when that gets put out

you know where did they all get that

they all get it from the same Source

right are they copying each other or do

they actually do they literally have a

talking points

memo they do don't they

isn't there literally a talking point

memo of some sort that they know where

to look for I think so

all right

um

so Michael uh Tracy tweets about uh so

uh

Noel is it Noel the author the old

author whatever he was so the guy who

was in charge of uh Twitter's executive

who was in charge of I guess Banning

people and other things

um he had a public event and he said

that the decision to ban Trump after

January 6 was impelled in part by the

trauma that he and other content

monitors batteries were experiencing

so there's some there's some confession

Joel Roth thank you

there's some confession that it wasn't

purely a free speech or even a financial

decision

it was how they felt

it was literally how they felt now it

wasn't the only factor I think you know

Michael Tracy might be you know giving

it a little more attention than it

deserves it wasn't the only Factor but

but the fact that how they felt was any

part of the decision

is

repeat it after me

exactly what you thought it was

it's exactly what you suspected

have we all just turned into Geniuses or

or are people just doing exactly what

you expect all the time now like nobody

does anything except exactly what you

expected

it's like that that's all there is

has anybody done anything unexpected in

a while

well yes there is somebody doing

something unexpected

do you think I'll be talking about that

person

oh maybe

Maybe

you know I think the problem with the

Twitter content people is that they

believe their own propaganda

don't you don't you think the biggest

problem that the left has with mental

health

is that they literally believe

themselves

and I don't even know how many people

who say things on the left you know the

notable people who are creating the

narrative

I have no idea how much they believe out

of their own narrative

but I know the people who consume their

narrative buy into it

and you'd have to think it would give

you mental health problems wouldn't you

because think about the narrative that

the left is given

and then the all the counter factuals or

the you know the The observed

things that debunk their their View and

somehow they can incorporate all the

counter factuals and still go along it's

like serious you know implied or is sort

of a an imposed mental illness

it's like a mental illness that's

imposed on them from the outside by the

narratives

I wonder if you could have narrative

poisoning

yeah I think I'm going to invent a term

narrative poisoning

if the narrative which is not true

causes you to have a physical reaction

which is true

then you have narrative poisoning

right

narrative poisoning is it which is

different from just believing something

that's not true

believing something that's not true is

sort of you know daily life we're all

believing stuff that's not true

but if you buy into a narrative and it

makes you sick you have narrative

poisoning

you don't have you don't you're not sick

because of reality

because that's not what a narrative is

narrative poisoning so I think that the

Twitter Executives actually had

narrative poisoning and they were they

were acting out partly on mental health

issues

let me let me now uh

excuse the behavior of all the Twitter

professionals

they were they were operating on a PTSD

which they gave themselves

it was self-induced PTSD

they had narrative poisoning TDS and

they acted on their Mental Health

they acted to reduce their mental health

problems and they used Twitter

like it was a pharmaceutical drug

that if they tweaked it just right they

could reduce their mental health issues

and so they did

so they did

how much do you love that

they use Twitter like a Pharma

Pharmaceutical

to improve their Mental Health

that actually happened

right there's nothing about that

sentence

that is hyperbole that actually

literally

observably happened

they they've admitted they had you know

mental distress

they told you what they did about it

and and in an out in an analogy sense

they use Twitter to cure their mental

distress

like you would use a pharmaceutical

and it had it had side effects

and the side effects were unexpected

all right

Dr Scott Barry Kaufman who's also a

interesting fellow on Twitter I

recommend them

um

he said today this this was

I'm going to disagree with him a little

bit here but this was a good

contribution to the conversation he said

people are blaming yay's behavior on his

bipolar diagnosis I'd like to point out

that when you see histrionic and

antagonist

antagonistic anti-social behaviors they

are much better predicted by

narcissistic personality disorder than

bipolar disorder see here for the

correlation Matrix and no pun intended

he shows a matrix

of course acid Matrix of uh

um different I know

different behaviors and what it means

you know and they correlate Etc

and if you see a chart a matrix of

mental

let's say mental illness

into in 2022 what do you what do you

think about it

it just all looks like astrology

when I see a complicated medical

scientific chart my immediate point is

that it's not an immediate impression is

well that's not true it's just

and it doesn't even matter what the

topic is

like it could have been you know any any

part of mental or physical health if

I've seen that that complicated chart

I would have just assumed it wasn't true

so that's where we are now we're at the

point where anything medical medical

experts say

and they put a big scientific chart with

data I just say well that's probably not

true I'm not going to ignore it

because you know when experts say

something you don't want to ignore it it

might be true but the credibility is you

know below zero

now do you think that the mental health

Community the the experts do you think

they can tell the difference between

these various diagnoses

do you think that they if you had 10

mental health professionals and they all

diagnosed EA do you think they'd all

agree

no they would not they would not agree

do you know why

because it's not a science

it's not even close it's complete

it's a it's a Pharma industry

created thing that's sort of trying to

look like science but mostly is

and scams and liars and

bad ideas yeah

so now just to be clear

I'm sure there are some valuable

elements of the mental health profession

I'm sure of it

but do you think I could figure out

which ones are the real ones and which

ones are the complete of course

not because I have no ability to do that

do you know who else can't do that

the people in the industry

because if they could tell what was

in their own industry

they'd all have the same opinion

but they can't that's why they have

different opinions and if the experts in

their own industry can't tell what's

real and what isn't why should you

believe them

let's say you go to a financial expert

Financial expert says here that here's

how you should invest you say thank you

good information I'm going to get a

second opinion though so you go to a

second Financial expert and they say do

something different

you go hmm two different opinions okay I

better check with another one let's say

you check with a bunch of financial

people and you get

you get advice that's on both directions

some say sell your stock some say hold

your stock some say get out of stocks

and do something different what would

your conclusion be would your conclusion

be that experts know more than you do

and and you should follow their advice

because their advice was different

what you should conclude is that the

experts don't know any more than you do

about what a stock is going to do in the

future which is true that's been well

demonstrated

so when the experts don't agree

your conclusion should be that's not

really a science it's not really it's

just a scam industry the financial

advice industry is a complete scam

industry

that for whatever reason well not

whatever reason because everybody who

treats it like it's real gets a lot of

money for doing it right the the TV

shows that have are the yeah mostly the

news but the the shows that have

um commercials from financial

institutions

that would be the same as like a hair

growth solutions

is that they know isn't real

right you don't think that the experts

on CNBC know that the experts they have

on don't know anything of course they

know that do you know why the experts on

CNBC know that the experts they have on

don't have useful information

because that's what every expert knows

the one thing every expert knows

correctly is that none of the experts

can predict

some will be right but that's because

everybody's predicting different things

of course some will be right then later

they'll say well look I was right for I

was the best predictor for three years

so let me handle your money you think

they'll be the best predictor for the

next three years

usually not

usually not because it's chance right

so the mental health professionals to be

look a lot like Financial professionals

which is I'll bet if you were if I if

you were yourself

a mental health professional you would

think that your own your own industry

was

prove me wrong

find somebody who works currently in

that industry and have a private

conversation with them because I did

that with somebody in the financial

advice industry and they told me flat

out now the advice I give my clients I

would never use for myself

flat out

no not even shaded a little bit no it's

it's basically a fake industry

all right um

uh I know you don't want me to

but there's something we need to say

about yay

can you handle it

a little bit

all right let me give you a little uh

walk in the park

of the history of yang

I want to see if

if you can put all of these little

pieces together into anything that feels

like a pattern

see if you can find the pattern okay

so you remember when uh yay interrupted

Taylor Swift's uh award-winning thing

and he got up there and instead of

letting the award ceremony progress in

this normal way

he got up there and said

probably

the main thing you should not say in

that situation

which is somebody else should have won

this award

right would you agree that whatever else

it was and you'll have lots of

descriptions of how bad it was would you

agree that he shouldn't have said it

can you all give me that

it was something that very specifically

you should not have said even if he

believed it

you shouldn't say it out loud in public

yeah

so that happened

do you know what uh yea was criticized

for when he was just doing music

do you remember what the biggest

criticism of va was when he was just the

artist doing music

anybody remember

because it's weird that you forgot

his songs were insanely misogynistic

said his critics

insanely misogynistic now

who thinks that in the last 20 years you

could be a public personality

and talk about women

and you could get away with it

so he said a lot of the stuff you're not

supposed to say about women

right

so he did that and and really like who

who goes after women like and just

insults them and makes money on it well

rappers so he comes from a world in

which saying the thing you're not

supposed to say

is exactly your job

right do you think rappers say what is

socially acceptable

I I feel like the essence of rap is

saying things that would be

uncomfortable for the people in charge

things about you know women things about

their feelings about police

maybe

um praising bad behavior illegal

behavior that sort of thing so rap

by his nature

is artists who are saying the most

dangerous things that you're

specifically not supposed to say

right

so that's part of the context well let's

move on do you remember of course you do

when yay said he likes Trump

wasn't that the one thing that a black

man couldn't say in public at the time

without huge consequences

it was it was like the most dangerous

thing a black man could say and he said

it over and over again

do you remember when yay went on uh

[Music]

I forget which show you'll tell me which

show because I'm blanking and he said

that slavery the history of slavery he

said there were so many more slaves than

there were masters of the time he said

that slavery looks like a choice

remember what happened when he said

slavery looks like a choice

he basically insulted

all of Black America and much of White

America and everybody else who might be

supportive and he said the worst thing

you could say about Black America

like I don't think you could have said a

worse thing

about Black Americans

and did he say I'm only talking about

some black people

when he said that when he was being

misogynistic did he say whoa whoa whoa

hold on no I'm not talking about women

I'm not talking about you know

to use his word I'm talking about some

individual women who have behaviors I

don't like did he ever clarify that I

don't think so

when he talked about black people

must have been a choice to slavery did

he say some of those black people must

have treated it like a choice

he didn't he treated like black people

or like a group that act together very

offensive wouldn't you say very

offensive yeah it was the worst thing

you could say in that situation

um

when yay made a turn toward being super

religious

and suddenly he wasn't that that edgy

rapper he was the Super religious guy

did it ever occur to you that that was

like the most dangerous thing that yay

could do

one of the most dangerous things you

could have done say two years ago

was the command as super Christian and

conservative family conservative

religious

it was just about the most dangerous

thing you could say in public

if you think about it right especially

from where he was coming from

most dangerous thing you could say

when he wore the White lives matter

shirt with Candace Owens

wasn't that the worst thing you could

say in public about that time

it was the most controversial worst

thing you could say yeah

now did he say that um

some white lives matter and some do not

I don't remember I think he treated

white people like they were

like one unit

but we're not right we're not one unit

there must be some white people that

don't matter

you know like serial killers and stuff

but yet he treated us all like we're

just one unit

very unfair so he's treated

women as if they're like one thing very

offensive

treated

um

he treated white people like one unit he

treated black people like they're one

group

um

and then he got to uh the Jews are

trying to stop him from being successful

wow

third rail it's the worst thing you

could say in public and expect to get

away with it

right the worst thing you could say

and he treated all Jews

like it's like one group of people when

in fact we knew that just some specific

individuals he had a problem with very

unacceptable treating an entire group as

if they're one thing

and then he took it up a level

you said I see good things about Hitler

well that's something you can't say

what is the worst thing you could say

the one thing nobody can say in public

Hitler has some good sides

you can't say that

it's the thing you can't say even with

free speech you can't say that

foreign

and then he teamed up with Nick Fuentes

and said you know Nick's great

oh you can't do that you cannot do that

and they started to work with Milo

yiannopoulos

you can't do that

no no you cannot say there's anything

good with Milo because if you do

it would feel like you're supporting

pedophiles wouldn't it

even though Milo is not accused of

pedophilia he is accused of something

that has a different word but people

confuse with pedophilia so he I think he

was talking about older older teens

which technically is not Peto but

everybody sees it that way right so I'm

not I'm not making that distinction I'm

saying that yea would know that people

won't make that distinction

so associating with Milo

put him in that sort of

little supportive of a pedophile

do you know what you can't say

you can never say anything anything this

even slightly

supportive

of the pedophile

so what do you say about Balenciaga when

they're accused of being a pedophile

organization

he defended them

not the specific photo shoot but he

defended the company

that is not defending itself from

pedophilia they're not defending

themselves

let me say it again

balenciago never said

how the photo shoot happened and

therefore explained why they're not

really guilty they never did

but yea defended

the group that is accused of being

pedophile friendly do you know what you

can't do you can't do that

but he did it

here's the pattern have you picked it up

yet

you see the pattern

and then another hint came when I

watched some more of the uh like behind

the scenes of yay's visit to Alex Jones

and you see Nick Fuentes

defending yay's treatment of quote the

Jews as like one group of people he has

trouble with

and here's what Fuente said

we're okay treating every other group as

one group

to which I said hey

that's so wrong

in ways I can't quite articulate

no no Nick Fuentes you racist

you

but your examples are pretty good but

that's wrong that's so wrong

except

makes you think doesn't it makes you

think

now if anybody's new to my live stream I

don't like Hitler

completely

like I I hate his little

mustache I ate the lint in his

pocket

he's all bad

because I know what to say in public

right

it's not hard now here's here's the

question that's going to blow your

head off you ready

you ready for this

let's accept that yay has some mental

conditions maybe he's

you know maybe he's uh you know bipolar

maybe something else

do you think that any of the mental

conditions that yay is accused of

would make him incapable of knowing

what things to say to make him popular

with the public and what things to say

that would make him very unpopular with

the public do you think he can't tell

the difference

between saying the right thing

and saying the thing that will

absolutely get you in trouble

do you think you can't tell the

difference

somebody says yes that if it's Mania if

he's in the menu phase he can't tell the

difference

I would think the Mania phase means he's

not afraid of uh consequences

I don't think it makes you unable to see

what's right in front of you

so here's here's my take it seems deeply

unlikely that he was surprised by any of

the reactions to any of the things I

mentioned do you think he was surprised

by any of it now do you think he would

know exactly what to say and do if you

wanted to get back into the good graces

of the public

of course of course we all do it's not

it's not like it's a hard question it

would be the easiest question in the

world just say you didn't mean any of

those things apologize for it you know

do some good works for people you might

have hurt

that sort of thing

now what about the uh the perfectly

valid complaint from the Jewish

community

that yea's rhetoric puts an extra risk

on Jews

true or false the way yea talks

makes them feel uncomfortable and adds

some extra risk to their life true true

absolutely true now let's let's go fold

Nick Fuentes

and compare that to everybody else

talking about anything

do you think that the way the Democrats

talk about me

puts me at greater risk of literally

being killed

yes or no is the way they talk about me

on social media every day it will be a

risk of physical danger yes yes

absolutely have you ever seen me say

that they need to stop doing that

because it's putting me in physical

danger have I ever said that you need to

stop using your free speech because it

puts me in physical danger I've noted

that it does

I've noted that it does

but that's different than saying they

need to stop it

right not once no

um

when

when yay said White lives matter

was he putting himself at greater

physical risk of course he was of course

he was and also the people who supported

him

did he put Candace Owens at greater

physical Risk by you know associating

her with that message yes yes I mean she

already puts herself at Great Risk by

the way Candace Owens is one of the

bravest people

you know in the public realm like she is

brave like you gotta you gotta give her

that

um

so look at the big picture

number one how many of you saw the

behind the scenes video of yay preparing

his little mask

uh and his routine for

Alex Jones

if you watched him preparing for it you

saw somebody who did not look crazy at

all

and as he was talking about wearing the

mask he was completely aware that that

would make it impossible to ignore

he went full rock star

full Trump and he said all right if

you're gonna if you're gonna cut me off

from social media I will become

impossible to ignore and then I'm going

to go on there and say

the most outrageous thing anybody ever

said

and let's let's see what happens here's

another clue

uh Ali Alexander who's also Associated

now with with yay

um he said on that video

specifically that they were breaking the

Overton window

maybe saying it wrong but the Overton

window is basically the idea that you

could keep your

um your critics or your enemies in a

state of continuous spinning if you keep

doing one more outrageous thing after

another they can't settle on the last

outrageous thing they have to keep up

with you so sort of what Trump did

all of his individual uh you know

statements that could have ended anybody

else didn't end Trump because he was

already on to the next statement and

that was controversial too and then the

next one right

so now that you know the following

things

the baby you didn't put together

number one

Kanye and his group are specifically and

overtly talking about the Overton window

everything they're doing supports that

theory of operation

there's no way I could possibly believe

that yay was not completely aware of all

of the reactions he would get from

beginning to end

every everybody would know the reaction

to everybody

here's what I think he's up to

and you might pull it off

I don't know

now and and again if you're not if

you're new to my live stream I'm not

supporting yay

and I said this yesterday I think yay is

making himself unlikable

and I accept that so I don't like him I

would like him if he said nice things

about the Jewish community

I would like him more I would like him

if he were you know

said things that I could Embrace without

being embarrassed I'd like that

'd be cool

but uh here's what I think he's up to

I think he's breaking your brain

and he's going to be very close to

succeeding

because you you can't tell where that

breaking point is because he's bending

us and we're bending and bending and

bending

it's not until you see the whole

portfolio of what he's done in the last

few years

that you see he is intentionally finding

the most challenging thing you can hold

in your mind and then making you deal

with

now I've said before that yea is not

somebody who just creates art

he is living art

everything he does pushes pushes or

challenges you

to reconsider the way you were thinking

of things right everything we're

watching is a challenge

to the old way you were thinking from

from the very beginning of what is an

award show

right the most basic thing that nobody

would question is what is an award show

well it's where somebody gets an award

and they say thank you and everybody

claps then yay said how about this isn't

award show how about not how about I go

up there and make it a different show

and then he did

so if you look at the whole portfolio

it looks a lot less crazy

and it looks like an artist

who is breaking all of our expectations

about what artists can do who can say

what

and he has broken maybe the most

important barrier that we have for

getting together

which is we're not allowed to say what

we think

we're not allowed to say what we think

and until we're allowed to say what we

think we'll never come together

the country can never come together if

we can't talk and say what we actually

think

as bad as it is right because lots of

times we think pretty ugly things yea is

just breaking all of the rules he's just

showing you you can say everything you

want to say as long as you're willing to

pay for it with

everything

[Laughter]

now let's double back to something that

you really don't see coming you ready

for this

when ye said that there were so many

more slaves than white people who were

trying to control them back in slavery

you said that it looked like a choice

and then all historians and especially

black historians said whoa whoa whoa

whoa

that was no choice

you know the the group that had the

weapons would have just you know

slaughtered us right

here's what I think yay would have said

speculating based on all everything that

he's done so far

I think he'd say

right

how does that affect my point

right they would have slaughtered them

and they also probably would have ended

up winning they might have lost 90

percent of their numbers

but they could have ended up winning

them because they had the numbers you

know they they just had to attack where

their weapons were and get the weapons

and then you know

so if you ask me

yea's original controversial point

that the slaves could have rebelled if

they wanted to badly enough

he basically proved by destroying his

own career

to win back freedom of speech for

himself

he basically demonstrated what he

thought

the slaves at the time should have done

which is Risk Everything

for their freedom

and reasonable people said no you don't

risk everything for your freedom you

risk what makes sense

and the a was saying no for Freedom

you'd Risk Everything

and so when it came to his own freedom

in the United States can he say whatever

he wants to say

no matter how ugly it is

can a man who feels and this is his own

feeling this is not my interpretation

can a man who feels that some

identifiable group

seems to be ganging up on him can he say

it

yeah does he have the right to be wrong

does he have the right to say something

that could put people at risk

he's fighting for that right and what he

traded for that right

was everything

he traded everything for it

now if you don't think this is one of

the greatest shows

you've ever seen you're not seeing the

pattern

if you look at any individual thing he

says we're supposed to be outraged by it

you're part of the performance right

you're not an observer you're part of

the performance your outrage

is part of the ACT

so what he says Hitler has some good

things about him I say God damn you yay

God damn you I'm sorry I don't want to

use the lord's name in vain I know some

of you get triggered by that and I

didn't mean to do it

so

I don't support him

because that's his message

his message to me is don't support me

right because he basically said things I

can't agree with

and I'm not going to agree with

so I don't support him but watching

watching this play out

amazing

now you want some more mind benders I

got more

do you think he can make his money back

do you think he could ever make his

money back

well one of his projects which is still

live

unless something's changed recently is

you know he had intended to build uh

communities that were designed

communities so they'd be better places

to live and would solve you know a

number of problems that our current

social situation doesn't solve

now uh he's only been messing around

with the prototypes

but you know the size of that market

is bigger than all the things he's ever

done

right the potential size of that is

is basically Elon Musk sized opportunity

and nobody's nobody's really competing

because other people who want to build

homes are just going to be home builders

and they would build something boring

that didn't move your soul

yay

potentially

potentially

could bring what he's brought to other

fields

to the housing field and make you

excited about it and then suddenly every

Community bills or license he makes a

hundred million dollars

and you know 100 million here 100

million there it adds up over time you

know he could be the richest man in

America in 20 years

and it's because he's entered the market

that would allow that to happen and he's

the right person for IT he's the right

person for the market

[Music]

so

here's the other possibility

you know that in my opinion Trump has

become

um

not viable

is there any way that yay could come

back from all of this

could he come back from the things he

said could he get back into the public

good graces

nobody else could

but he could

he could yep now I'm not going to

predict that they will

I'm just going to say I look at his

talent stack

and I look at what what you would call

his mental illness or whatever's going

on there

and I don't see that's going to stop him

it doesn't look like that would stop him

he knows exactly what it would take

right don't you think he knows what to

take because because he knew exactly

what would get him in trouble

you don't think there was any surprise

about that he knew exactly what he was

doing you don't think he knows exactly

how to get out of it

let me tell you how

do you think I could model it do you

think I could give you a thing he could

say that would just totally get him out

of the out of trouble

I think he could

here's me modeling it

you know

um

I think that my comments about the Jews

were out of place

and I was acting on my feelings at the

time

however the bigger issue is can people

say what they feel when they feel it and

still survive in this country because we

can't have a country

if I can't say something out of anger

and still have a job

and I'd like that for you as well

I want us all to live in the country at

work and say what we want to say

and we'll figure out a way to be okay

with it we shouldn't be doing things

that make it too dangerous for other

people but be aware that all speech

comes with a little bit of danger

right it's it's built into Free Speech

you can't make it go away

you've watched me say every possible

thing that you're not supposed to say

and so far I'm still alive

Free Speech won't kill you I just proved

it

now can we stop saying bad things about

each other as a group

can you join me and let's not treat

black people like their one group or

white people like their one group or

Jews like their one group or Christians

like they're one group can we just stop

doing it

because I'll go first

I'll go first

now if he said that and you said to

yourself

huh

he actually sounds like he means it

he actually I I could hear his actual

regret

and the way he phrase it he's giving us

a reason why it happened

he was upset about his situation

he's he's told you what he's going to do

to correct it

and then he he tried to bring you to a

higher ground where we all don't have

that problem and we don't have that kind

of problem with each other and we figure

out how to talk while being a little bit

offensive because that's just how

talking works

foreign

now you don't think he could sell that

again I'm not predicting he will try to

do anything like that because he's hard

to predict right you can't really

predict him if you could predict him he

wouldn't be gay

but he could

now when I said that did you say to

myself oh my God that will never work

nobody would ever accept that

have you ever heard the uh

well there's a couple of analogies that

come to mind

um

if if you've ever worked at a restaurant

you know or any retail you know that the

following thing is true

the best way to get a repeat customer

is have a bad experience for your

customer and then they complained and

then you fix it

if for example you go to a restaurant

and something was wrong and they comp

you the meal your odds of eating there

again are pretty high

you know if it's a good restaurant you

just have one little issue right

so

yeah

we do have a soft spot as humans for

people who admit their mistake and try

to fix it

in fact that's some of our favorite

people

a lot of movies and books are about

somebody who is flawed and then the

process of the movie they redeem

themselves right the the Redemption

story is one of our strongest

most built-in you know narratives that

run our run our lives so if he could

turn into the reformed person

who becomes the the story of who you

don't want to be or becomes the the

reason that we should

you know value Free Speech or something

like that you can imagine he could make

it work

you can imagine

that does it blow your mind

that he's a black man who says white

lives matter and he's working with

Nick Fuentes

and Milo

doesn't it look like he chose he chose

his group to be the most offensive group

he possibly could and Ali Alexander was

one of the organizers of the January 6

event he's not charged with anything

because he didn't do anything illegal

um but still his name is associated with

that right doesn't it look like he

intentionally chose the least

publicly

acceptable people

here's the weird thing they're not all

the same person

so he's got you know person of color

person who's gay person who's you know

the the most extreme right-wing person

I mean he's really got a little pirate

yeah it's a pirate ship his little

pirate ship

do you know what makes people

comfortable

people get comfortable

when they see that you're the captain of

a pirate ship

because they go well he's not going to

kick me out for being weird

because I'm just a pirate

like all the Pirates are different one

has one leg one has one leg but we're

all just Pirates

you know the the pirate ship

um

metaphor or analogy I forget which

it would be a good way to bring the

country together wouldn't it

you know instead of saying you're a bad

pirate and I'm a good pirate

how about just saying you know we're all

kind of pirates but we're on the same

ship

that's what I liked about Trump

yeah you know of course his critics say

oh you're a big racist but he had no

problem hanging out with literally

anybody

right

if you look at the people Trump has

personally associated with it was

everybody no limits at all

I love that uh the the people I'm

worried about is people hanging around

with people who look like them I'm not

comfortable with that

what is one piece I don't know what that

is

uh are you giving him the benefit to

talk about yay am I giving yay the

benefit of a doubt and assuming his

attentions are good uh yes

yes I am doing that explicitly I'm

assuming that yay's intentions are good

because I also believe that his

religious faith is real

does anybody doubt his religious faith

that's a lot of work I mean if that's a

if that's a trick it's a lot of work to

put into a trick

no I think he's I think he's completely

sincere about the religion stuff

which suggests he's sincere about

creating a better world he's just doing

it in a way that we've never seen

anybody do anything

unless you think Trump did

all right

um

now is there any way that I can say what

I've said without getting smeared by the

left I think they'll probably drag me

now won't they do you think I'll get

dragged by this afternoon

because I think I think the media is

desperately looking for somebody who

makes a mistake of Defending yay right

like the classic trap is the first

person who looks like they're defending

him is going to get dragged in so that

you know not to defend him

that's how it's played

now I don't know if I can uh if I can

avoid that by saying I dislike him

because he is going out of his way to

make all of us dislike him so I accept I

accept his message

all right

uh yeah the locals is our pirate ship

that

Scott your struggles are uncertain comp

okay

um

my comp oh my struggle I got it got it

took me a while to put that together

um

he's trying to destroy his brand I don't

know

I mean he's already done that

as something wrong

there's an article already about me

is there already had peace on me yet

does anybody seem to have peace on me

yet

probably there should be one by the end

of today

that would be the normal thing but I

think they'll probably just keep yay end

of the news now here's here's the other

possibility

do you think yay would run as a Democrat

or a Republican

because he hasn't said right

what do you think

I feel like he's going to have to start

his own party isn't he

because he already said he's the

birthday party or something yeah he's a

birthday party I don't know what you

have to do to officially be a new

political party but

but uh who would yay take more votes

away from

Democrats are Republicans who would yay

take more votes away from

you think he could get black votes

after you said White lives matter

I think you're right

I think he I think he could pull more

away from the Democrats

which would make him the Joe manchin of

presidential candidates

in other words Joe manchin just by being

the one person or one of two who can go

back and forth on an issue guests to

decide all our legislation

so maybe yay could run for office and

know that his his involvement would

change the

the result what do you think the

Democrats would be willing to offer him

to stop running

they might fund his yay community

just to get him out of the race

I don't know it could be interesting but

ladies and gentlemen that is all I have

for now for the Public Presentation so

I'm going to say uh

good night to two or good day good day

to YouTube and Spotify and Rumble and

I'm going to talk to the locals people

privately bye for now