Episode 1880 Scott Adams - Let's Figure Out Who Blew Up The Pipeline. Get In Here
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com Content: ----------- - Nord Stream pipelines and John Brennon's credibility - People pushing for face masks again - J6 Gaslighters main assumption - If we had pulled out of NATO - President Trump's trivial legal problems - Narcan vending machines ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
Do I seem unprepared? Well, you're right. You're going to send this tweet and then you gotta send this tweet, and I'll be right with you. Watching the cartoonist tweet, that's the entertainment for the day. Boom, boom. All right, everybody. Finally I'm here. You know, one of us was going to be late…
View segment →you like to take it up a level. And I think we can do that with a little thing called the simultaneous sip. Are you ready for the simultaneous sip? All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass or a tankard, chalice, a canteen, a jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind, certainly with your favorite liquid. I…
View segment →akes-everything-better. It's called the simultaneous sip. It happens now. If you didn't already know, the official Coffee with Scott Adams mug is available for pre-order. It'll have a little drawing of my bald head on the front. It'll have the simultaneous sip on the back, and it will have the word…
View segment →need to get one too. All right. Well, I'm going to start with the best story of the day. So CNN had ex-CIA director Brennan to talk about the Ukraine situation, and he notes that Russia seems to be losing everything and it's all falling apart for Russia. And he believes that Russia sabotaged the No…
View segment →it'll skew things. Or they'll say this one is so low quality that even though the other ones are higher quality, you know, we'll throw it out. So those studies end up being subjective accidentally. Some meta studies are well made, some are not. And usually we can't tell the difference. All right, s…
View segment →lose the next election? Of course they will. Do you think they'll believe it? Yes, yes I do. I do think they'll believe it. That's how it works. So now am I wrong? Am I wrong that everything follows from that assumption? Am I missing anything? The entire understanding of that day has everything to…
View segment →ou could certainly make the case that it's a good thing we're in NATO. It's the only thing to stop Putin, and that would be a strong argument. But you could also make the case that maybe none of this would look this way if he had pulled out of NATO and Putin didn't feel threatened. The other possibi…
View segment →biggest legal risk at the moment — correct me if I'm wrong because it might be what I'm missing — is a civil case against Trump the company, not even against Trump himself. So not criminal and not even against Trump. Am I right? That's his biggest risk right now. And what is the power of the case? L…
View segment →ce would be compared to Biden. Now of course Democrats look at Biden and say yeah he's killing it, he's doing great. And Republicans say the opposite. Although they have the lady who claimed that he raped her in a dressing room in a store, E. Jean Carroll. So I guess she's doing her lawsuit again, b…
View segment →ccidental organization in which we have a collaborative intelligence that can actually solve some problems. And one of the problems with fentanyl overdoses is bad information. So if you had better information you would know for example that Narcan is something you could get at your drugstore. And if…
View segment →school. Now I believe some number of them will get it for their kid to have at college or something. Now there are also some apps. I think PulsePoint is one app that calls for people who know first aid, I believe. But I think within that umbrella you could call for people who, if you sign up for it…
View segment →em giving it to someone who does not need it. We have somebody who seems to know what they're talking about, right? So you don't need to worry about if it's the wrong time to give it. You don't need to know if for sure it was fentanyl. It could have been an opioid and if they're still alive, give it…
View segment →n there'll always be an exception, but I can't see the medics, even if they saw some illegal drugs, I think that they would just sort of leave them in your apartment when they took you. I just don't think they're taking those with them. All right. Yeah, the cops do come but I don't think the cops a…
View segment →individuals will defame and politicians will hunt Republicans, but that's a long way from the whole country wants to go to war with each other. There's nothing like that brewing. Foreign wasn't meant like with a hunting license and an Elmer Fudd hat. Now exactly what is the diameter of the bottom o…
View segment →ng people. What? What am I saying that's killing people? What? All right. If you need a link to the mug, see my Twitter feed this morning. It's near the top. All right, that's all for now. YouTube, I'll talk to you tomorrow. Oh, I helped you in your last relationship with the reframe. Good bye for…
View segment →Do I seem unprepared? Well, you're right. You're going to send this tweet and then you gotta send this tweet, and I'll be right with you. Watching the cartoonist tweet, that's the entertainment for the day. Boom, boom.
All right, everybody. Finally I'm here. You know, one of us was going to be late today, and I'm glad it was me because you're all on time because you're awesome and you like to take it up a level. And I think we can do that with a little thing called the simultaneous sip. Are you ready for the simultaneous sip? All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass or a tankard, chalice, a canteen, a jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind, certainly with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the don't-be-here-the-day-the-thing-makes-everything-better. It's called the simultaneous sip. It happens now.
If you didn't already know, the official Coffee with Scott Adams mug is available for pre-order. It'll have a little drawing of my bald head on the front. It'll have the simultaneous sip on the back, and it will have the words "Ah" on the bottom. The link is in my Twitter feed today. And I have to tell you that the shipping and packing costs are the majority cost of the mug. So it's a big old thick heavy mug. It's a substantial mug. But the biggest cost is keeping it from being broken while they're shipping it. So we all wanted it to cost about half as much, but unfortunately the shipping just eats that up. It's heavy ceramic and it will work on your coffee heater just fine, I believe.
We already have over 70 of them that have been ordered since I just tweeted it. We should be blowing through our minimum guarantee pretty soon. All right, you ordered two. Good, good. I guess I need to order mine. I need to get one too.
All right. Well, I'm going to start with the best story of the day. So CNN had ex-CIA director Brennan to talk about the Ukraine situation, and he notes that Russia seems to be losing everything and it's all falling apart for Russia. And he believes that Russia sabotaged the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which is Russia's own pipeline. Now it had been turned off already, so they had turned it off so it wasn't delivering any gas. So although it was not delivering any gas, John Brennan thinks that Putin blew it up to really send a strong signal to the West. And I think it did.
Now a lot of people don't know where Putin got that strategy of blowing up his own assets. It originally came from a military genius who came up with this first. It's sort of non-obvious, right? You're like, why would you blow up your own valuable asset? But no, it came from this. It's actually a military doctrine. There was a famous military strategist named Mel Brooks, and in his military treatise it was called, I believe it's called *Blazing Saddles*. And there's a scene in there in which we learn if you hold a gun to yourself and you threaten to kill yourself, sometimes using unpleasant language, if you threaten to kill yourself, then people won't kill you. Like, okay, I'm gonna kill this person. Okay, Mel Brooks used different language. So I think it really looks like the Mel Brooks play. I think Putin is threatening to destroy all of his assets, maybe one at a time, if we don't give him what he wants. So that seems quite reasonable.
John Brennan — now talk about a credible guy. John Brennan was one of the people who helped collect the 50 intel prior and current intel people who said that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. Yeah, he's also the same John Brennan who pushed the Russia collusion hoax. But there's no reason to believe that he's lying this time when he says that Russia attacked itself to teach us a lesson. And let me tell you, I feel a little bit closer to maybe Ukraine will have to surrender. I mean, if Russia keeps bombing its own assets, I don't know if any of us are safe. I mean, what if Putin decides to bomb Moscow next? What are we going to do? Would Ukraine just surrender? I mean, the strategy looks pretty strong. So yeah, Russia will be attacking itself because attacking Ukraine didn't work out at all.
I think Putin needed to win. He's like, okay, have we attacked anything successfully lately? The news from the Donbas, not so good, not so good. Okay, we need to have some kind of a win. Can you please attack something successfully? I need to be able to say we attacked something and we got the win. Well, you know, the Ukrainians are really dug in. Don't tell me what you can't do. I need a win. You need to blow something up and I need to be able to say that I got that thing. You know, we're running out of weapons and our soldiers are not really — well, no, no, I need you to blow something up and give me a win. Well, you know, the only thing we could actually blow up would be our own stuff. I don't need to know the details. Just give me a win.
So then the Russian general said, all right, what's the least protected thing we own? And they thought, our pipeline. We could blow that damn pipeline up. So Putin gets the win for a successful military operation against his own pipeline, according to John Brennan. Has he ever lied to us? I mean, you can trust John Brennan, right? I mean, just because he ran an organization whose entire job is lying to us and he's documented as the biggest liar in American politics, bar none, bar none. But this time he's totally telling the truth.
But the funniest thing was watching, I think it was Brianna Keilar on CNN, who asked Brennan why he thinks that Putin blew up his own pipeline to teach the West a lesson when the pipeline — they could just turn it off. She was like, you could just turn it off. You have to blow it up? Then I saw some speculation that really it was a clever trick and that Brennan is right. And here's why they blew it up. Because if Putin had not blown it up, he might be legally required to turn it on later to fulfill legal contracts. So to get out of his legal contracts later, he blew up his own pipeline.
Now, if there's one thing that we know is true, Putin is very concerned about his legal agreements and he would be willing to bomb his entire country so that people didn't think he'd be the kind of guy who'd say one thing and then do another. Because that's not the kind of reputation you want to have out there. Perfectly reasonable, perfectly reasonable. Because prior to knowing that Putin was bombing his own pipeline, according to John Brennan, I didn't know if Putin was trustworthy or not. You know, I didn't know if you could depend on him to keep a deal. But now that I know he would be willing to bomb his own assets to get out of a deal, well, I trust him more. And I think that's what he was going for. He was going for some kind of a business credibility kind of a play. And I think when you see somebody blow up their own assets so they don't have to deliver what they promised, that makes me trust them. So I think this hypothesis that Russia is behind the blowing up of their own asset is completely feasible. Completely. I buy it. Yup, totally believable.
Now, as a backdrop to this, and don't make too much of a big deal about this because we know what the story is. We know Russia blew up their own assets because John Brennan would never lie to us on CNN. That's something we know for sure. But some people, you know, there's always some rogue, there's always some goofy bastard who's got some conspiracy theory, right? So here's the conspiracy that's going around now. There's a video of Joe Biden before the Ukraine invasion saying in public — I know it's ridiculous — but saying in public in the clearest possible terms that if Russia invaded, those pipelines were no longer going to be functional. Now some people say that matters. And the fact that Biden directly said if you do this, we're going to take care of those pipelines, and he gave a smile that looked exactly like he meant blowing them up. Because there's a smile that says I mean blowing them up, right? You have to see the video.
Here's how you talk if you don't mean blowing them up. "Mr. Biden, are you saying that you're going to shut down those pipelines?" "Yes, we'll use whatever means we can. We're going to shut down those pipelines." That's how you say it if you don't mean we're going to blow them up. Here's how Biden said it: "So how will you do it?" "I promise you we can do it." Now that's pretty much the blow-it-up face, isn't it? I mean, I think he told us he's going to blow them up, and then they blew up.
Now to me this looks like nothing but giant energy companies manipulating our government to reduce the competitiveness of their competitor. That literally is all I see here. Do you see anything except a giant energy company has control of our military and the military is doing the bidding of some energy company in the United States? That's what it looked like to me. It looked like it literally was a commercial operation to increase the profits of American gas companies. Now I think that's the reason it happened. Also maybe it has some military, you know, homeland European protection, whatever. I mean that might be good too. But you know, when follow the money works this well, if you can follow the money this directly, I don't know if you need to ask any other questions. I mean to me this doesn't even look like a national interest so much as just an energy company interest.
Now you could argue — and I'm going to argue this — that when the United States supports its energy industry, even doing things that you might think are over the line or sketchy or too far or whatever, that the United States does better. You know, there are a lot of smart people who say basically look at the energy situation of any country and you know everything you need to know. That's pretty close to true, isn't it? If you've got a country that has cheap energy or is a major producer of energy, they seem to always be doing fine. So if you take care of your energy business, your country is going to be a strong country. If you don't take care of your energy business and you have to buy energy from other people and that's all you have, you're just a buyer of energy, you're going to be very vulnerable.
So I'm not sure that it is wrong for the country to do things that are literally just good for big energy companies in the United States. No, it's creepy and it's unethical and it's not free markets. You could find a hundred ethical and moral reasons why we shouldn't do it easily, right? It wouldn't take any effort at all. At the same time, having our government and our energy companies basically being one entity and working for each other's benefit actually kind of works. Kind of works. Yeah, I mean I don't like it, but strangely it works.
All right. Can we do this next conversation without some of you just flying out of control? Okay, see if I can just get through this next two minutes without somebody just going nuts on me, okay? So there's a trending hashtag for face masks. No, I hate face masks. I am anti-face masks. I hate them. And we're not going to talk about the science. However, it is trending again because cases are up and people are pushing for face masks again.
Now in this context, some doctor tweeted the studies that he says support face masks. I retweeted it with a comment on just the messenger. Now the way you should take that when I say I'm just the messenger, that means I'm not endorsing it. That's how you should interpret it. If I say, hey, look at this, this looks pretty solid, then I'm probably endorsing it or at least I think there's nothing wrong with it. But if I say I'm just the messenger, you should very clearly see that I'm just telling you what other people are saying.
Because I had always wondered why it is that the people on the right say there are no studies that support masks and the people on the left say there are tons of them, they're all over the place. Have you ever wondered about that? Like why could it both be true that there are tons of studies saying they work at the same time there are no studies that say they work, and both be true? So I think maybe I have something close to an answer, which is this list of studies. It was sort of a study about other studies of masks. It took about 10 seconds for, you know, various people who know about data to just rip it apart as ridiculous. So apparently this study happened at the very beginning of the pandemic when all of our data was bad, and basically it was just a bunch of useless studies. They were summed up by another useless study.
Now if you were non-critical and you saw that there were a whole bunch of studies in the same direction, what would you do if you were not very sophisticated about how people lie with data? I think it would be pretty convincing. Now let me stop again because I know a whole bunch of people are flying crazy at home. No, I'm anti-mask and I have been from the start. But the conversation about it is part of the context of America, so I can't avoid it.
So I think the entire thing comes down to this. I think the entire thing comes down to the people on the left believe the studies because there are lots of them, but the people on the right don't believe the studies because when you look at them they don't seem credible. You know, they just don't seem to be from a time period and it doesn't look like they could untangle all the confounders, you know, all the variables that could affect them. I mean the most obvious thing is that the people who are likely to wear masks have something in common with each other, right? And the country is most likely to do it. They probably have something in common as a country. So I just don't know that you can sort it out. I also don't believe that they would have kept in the study anything that said the opposite, right? Because when you do a study of studies, let's say a meta study or even just a study of studies which would be different, you're deciding what's in and what's out. What they never do is throw everything in because they always say, well, you know, this one is so big you don't want to put this one in there, it'll skew things. Or they'll say this one is so low quality that even though the other ones are higher quality, you know, we'll throw it out. So those studies end up being subjective accidentally. Some meta studies are well made, some are not. And usually we can't tell the difference.
All right, so is everybody comfortable that I'm anti-mask? Period. Period. Anti-mask. But now you understand why the left believes they work, because there are people sending studies around. It is sort of the laundry list thing. If there are enough studies, it doesn't matter that they're all bad because there are lots of them. So I think that's the whole story anyway.
The January 6th insurrectionists — this just amazes me because every once in a while you have to go back and shake your head at this. The entire January 6 situation depends on one assumption — more than one, but one that I care about — and the one assumption is what Trump actually believed. Am I right? Because if Trump believed the election was genuinely fake, then what he did would make sense actually. It would make sense as a candidate and it would make sense as a patriot. It would make sense as an American if he genuinely believed the vote was hanky.
Now the entire January 6th thing depends on his critics knowing what he really secretly thought that he has never said out loud to anybody that we have any evidence of. So here's Trump, the person who says everything he thinks. Am I right? Trump is the person who says everything he thinks, and yet there's no evidence whatsoever in writing, any reports, not even anonymous reports of Trump ever being inconsistent with his belief that the election was sketchy. So why is it that the most unrealistic assumption is underpinning the entire thing and we don't pay attention to that?
I feel like I'm the only one who's ever mentioned this actually. Have you ever seen anybody else say everything depends on what he was thinking? And if you were to make two hypotheses of what he was thinking, do you think there's really any chance that he thought the election was fair? Because he was thinking the same thing that most Republicans thought. Don't you believe that most Republicans thought it was sketchy? Most, I think most did. So if he had the same opinion as most Republicans who had the same information he had — we were all just watching TV, right? He didn't have secret intel. He was just watching TV like the rest of us. So if he watched TV and you watched TV and you said to yourself that doesn't look like a fair election to me, I don't know if you're right or wrong, but say that was your opinion. Why would you think he wouldn't have that opinion? What possible argument could you make that he would singularly believe the election was fair when everybody was looking at exactly the same information at the same time? All the people on his side said I'm not so sure if that election was fair.
And of course, doing the most obvious analysis you can do, did the Democrats think the election was fair? Did Hillary think the election was fair when Trump won the first time? No. The most common, believable, and ordinary assumption you can make about this situation, as well as when Hillary lost, the most common ordinary assumption is that the people who lost genuinely believe there's some question about the outcome. They genuinely believe it.
Now if I were Trump's team, that's the only thing I would talk about. I say, are you making the case that you believe the president actually thought he lost when nobody else thought that? Now it's separate from the argument of whether he really lost. So their trick is to argue whether or not it's true that the election was fair has nothing to do with this because nobody was operating on the truth because it was unknowable. There was a suspicion, but at that time it was pretty hard to know what was true and what wasn't. If you were biased toward thinking the election was rigged, as the Democrats were when they lost, as Republicans are when they lost, as the Democrats will be again if they lose, you don't think the Democrats are going to say the election was rigged if they lose the next election? Of course they will. Do you think they'll believe it? Yes, yes I do. I do think they'll believe it. That's how it works.
So now am I wrong? Am I wrong that everything follows from that assumption? Am I missing anything? The entire understanding of that day has everything to do with what Trump secretly actually believed about the election. Because if he believed that it was rigged and he didn't do a thing about it, I wouldn't vote for him. Would you? I mean I don't vote anyway, but seriously, if he believed it had been rigged and he did nothing, didn't complain about it, just sort of slunk off to his retirement, he wouldn't be the person you thought you voted for the first time. And I'm not sure you'd want any president to be like that. I mean I want my president to say what he believes and to act on it.
And the Saturday defense, it wouldn't be an insanity defense because most Republicans believe there was some problem with the election. Now just to be clear so I don't get banned, I'm not aware of any proof of election irregularity at scale. I'm not aware of any. But would I be? I'm not sure I would be. Yeah, he told them to go down and peacefully protest. Now he did of course want Pence to delay things, and there are smart people who say that wasn't legal and you can't do that. And I guess that's the bipartisan bill that even Schumer is willing to say something about the electoral votes. You don't want to play with them after the election, and that's probably — I haven't looked at it but probably a good idea. I mean if it's bipartisan, probably a good idea.
All right. It was the most perfect election of all time. Well I've said many times that it's a miracle that all 50 of our election systems work perfectly, we are told, and yet every other organization and system that we know about is completely corrupt, which we know for sure. You don't have to wonder. We know that now. Is the FBI corrupt? Yeah, yeah, yeah. We know that. There's no longer any question.
Have I complained too many times about how my critics like to come into my tweets and compare me to Garfield and other comics? And it's usually it looks like this: oh, the Garfield guy again, or here comes the Beetle Bailey guy to say something. And it took me a while to figure out that these were compliments. Their attempts at insults. But you know, do you see what they get wrong? It took me a while to notice. Why is it that it's an insult to call me Garfield? What makes that an insult? It makes it an insult because the person saying it believes that everybody who sees that understands that Garfield is a lesser good comic than Dilbert. Am I wrong? The reason they would call me these other cartoons, the whole point of it is they believe the other cartoons are of lesser quality. You know what? They don't call me Peanuts. They don't call me Calvin and Hobbes, although I have seen that but that's rare. Do you know why? Because my critics believe that those two comics are unambiguously better than Dilbert. So do I. Most people would agree with that. So they call me the lesser comics because the whole point of it is that they're not as good as my comic. And every time it happens now I'm thinking I feel like you just complimented me because this wouldn't even make sense. The entire point of the insult is that that other comic is a lower quality than mine. Yeah, Cathy, etc.
Now I'm not saying that they're lower quality. I'm saying that that's the whole point of people saying it, is that they believe they're lower quality. So thank you for the compliments. I appreciate it. Keep them coming.
Here are some things that I read about myself in the past week. So if you wonder, Scott, do you ever get much trouble online? Do you ever get bothered by things that people say to you online? Well, not that much. But here's some things I got called this week: a Holocaust denier. And it is alleged that I believe that rape is okay because it's natural. That's actually a widespread opinion about me on the internet, is a widespread opinion that I believe that rape's fine, it's just natural. Somebody actually thinks that was my opinion or is my opinion. Okay, fine.
And people also believe that I'm an anti-mask crusader who is secretly trying to get you to all wear masks. So at the same time that I'm one of the most notable critics of masks, spend a lot of time notably talking about not wearing masks and required masking places, trying to mobilize people to get rid of their masks, and so that makes me pro-mask. If they read my mind they can see that on the inside, even though on the outside I'm totally anti-mask. But on the inside they can see that because of the things I tweet. They can tell that even though I don't wear a mask because I'm so afraid that I'm really pro-mask.
There are books coming out, more books about Trump of course. And they're running out of insults. Every book that comes out about Trump, they've got to have a new thing, but they're running out of the good ones. So here's some new books, and it doesn't matter who wrote them, right? It doesn't matter at this point. It wouldn't matter if it's Maggie Haberman or somebody else, but these are somebody else. But they're in the news today. So one of the things is that Trump was way more serious about buying Greenland than you knew. He was actually really serious about buying Greenland, and he made an argument that it's sort of close to our domain and would be valuable to us and Denmark wasn't using it for much anyway. But apparently he actually negotiated with Denmark to some degree. He was actually trying to get it.
Now is that a criticism? Is it a criticism that Trump literally tried to buy Greenland? That feels like the opposite of a criticism. Don't they have valuable minerals? Isn't it geopolitically, geostrategically important? I mean that should have been framed as a compliment. Now the fact that it didn't happen, is that an insult or is that a criticism? No, it was a long shot. It was a long shot that cost him nothing except embarrassment, and he was willing to take the embarrassment for the potential of maybe having an upside that would be amazing. I mean again it looks like a criticism. That's more of a compliment. I want the president who does that.
All right, here's another one. Here's another criticism. They have to say — I don't know, is that really a criticism? One of the books claims that Trump was way more serious than you thought about withdrawing from NATO. Is that a criticism? What would be happening in Ukraine right now? Well I don't know, but it wouldn't be costing us money. I don't know, maybe Ukraine would have just rolled over and Putin would own Ukraine and we wouldn't have known the difference and we'd be getting our Ukrainian wheat and Europe would be getting their stuff and Ukraine's corrupt government would be put out of business and they would go back to sort of how things used to be where Russia dominated that country. Now that would be bad for the Ukrainians, I mean I guess they would say that. I don't know. But can we say that Trump was wrong about withdrawing from NATO based on what we know today? It's actually not obvious, is it? You could certainly make the case that it's a good thing we're in NATO. It's the only thing to stop Putin, and that would be a strong argument. But you could also make the case that maybe none of this would look this way if he had pulled out of NATO and Putin didn't feel threatened. The other possibility is that Putin wouldn't feel threatened by having NATO on his doorstep if America was not part of NATO. I mean everything would have looked different, wouldn't it?
So I don't know. I'm not saying it would have been a good idea to pull out of NATO. That's not my opinion. But it's not obvious which was the right way to go. It's not obvious. Now I think that also when he talks about pulling out of NATO, that could have been a negotiating position as well. So he may have been really serious about pulling out if the other countries didn't step up with money. You get that, right? He could be totally serious about pulling out if you don't give us more money. But then other countries gave more money, so I don't know if he was still as adamant about pulling out. But I think he was serious if they didn't give more money, which I would have agreed with actually. I think you did have to threaten to pull out if they didn't cough up more money. I think that part was right.
And then his aides worried that he might try to start a war with Iran or North Korea because of his crazy ways. Neither of those things were even close. He wasn't close to a war with Iran. It wasn't even close, I don't think. Was he? He didn't say anything that looked even close. It looked like he was just going to boycott them forever or whatever. And what about North Korea? North Korea is one of his success stories. He took the temperature way down in North Korea. I mean what was he going to do, nuke North Korea, his friend?
So the books have completely run out of material. Think about his legal troubles. Correct me if I'm wrong, but not counting January 6 for which no indictments are likely to come, say the experts, his biggest legal risk at the moment — correct me if I'm wrong because it might be what I'm missing — is a civil case against Trump the company, not even against Trump himself. So not criminal and not even against Trump. Am I right? That's his biggest risk right now. And what is the power of the case? Let me summarize it. The Trump company handled their accounting the way all normal companies do. That's it. That's the case. They did things exactly the way normal companies do. They took the highest number they thought they could get away with when valuing it for loans, and then they got the loan and then they paid back the loan and then the bank was happy. But when they were doing their property tax assessments, you want the lowest number you can get away with. There he went the opposite way, like everybody, like everybody.
Now he may have exaggerated or the Trump company may have exaggerated more than other companies do, and that would be worth discussing. But no matter what it is, it's going to be a civil fine. It's not exactly the crime of the century to have exaggerated more when you are the company that exaggerates more and your entire business model is built on your brand. The Trump brand is the value of the business. And so would you expect somebody whose entire business model is about telling people their brand is better than maybe it is? This is a little business model. So if he did it consistently everywhere he told everybody that he was better than maybe somebody else thinks, I don't know, it might be a crime. Likely you might be able to find a jury who says yeah, that's slightly a crime. That's a little bit more exaggerating than I think you should have done. So maybe you should pay a fine. That is just business as usual for every company, every big company that gets audited. Do you think they get away from the audit with nothing? Do you think there's nothing? Just pick a company. Just pick any company. Pick Google. Do you think if Google got audited they'd end up paying nothing? Sometimes maybe. But it's very common that a traditional company gets audited and pays a little extra money because they exaggerated something. That's how it happens. They exaggerate stuff or minimize things.
So just think about the fact that what the remaining complaints about Trump have all just kind of dissolved. So the January 6th thing has turned into nothing. They're trying to breathe some life into it with the jaws of life today, I guess. So they're trying to make the nothing into something. But January 6 proved there was nothing, at least nothing of criminal indictable quality. Now all of his other legal problems have gone away except that trivial one that really is nothing. What's left? What's left? Anything? So he wasn't colluding with Russia. I mean what's left? The only thing left is how his performance would be compared to Biden. Now of course Democrats look at Biden and say yeah he's killing it, he's doing great. And Republicans say the opposite. Although they have the lady who claimed that he raped her in a dressing room in a store, E. Jean Carroll. So I guess she's doing her lawsuit again, but nobody thinks that's going anywhere, right? Isn't that just a he-said-she-said situation? That's the end of it.
On Twitter today Musk said he would discuss buying into Rumble. Oh, did that really happen? Did that really happen? Holy — what's the price of Rumble right now? Can somebody check the stock price? So Rumble was 12 yesterday or this morning. Oh, he was asked to and he declined. Oh come on. All right, he was asked about it and he declined. What? Don't get me all excited about that.
Now you know the reason I'm excited is because I'm an investor. So I invested in the Locals platform which got combined with Rumble. So I ended up accidentally with some Rumble stock, which turned out to be the best accidental investment I ever made. Yeah, Rumble's worth a shot. Nicely done, Rumble. Worth a shot. Okay, well done.
All right. Question: how many of you think that Elon Musk is secretly bankrolling The Babylon Bee? Because if you notice that The Babylon Bee's budget seems to be way better than it used to be, the quality of their content and also the volume of it is suspiciously very good. Now it's not suspicious that they're good because you know they're good. But you saw Elon Musk met with them. Obviously they got along. They have some kind of connection, the founders of The Babylon Bee. Now wouldn't that be the number one most likely thing you would ever expect? You'd expect him to secretly bankroll it just because it's funny. If I had his money, nothing would have kept me from giving some of it to The Babylon Bee. Am I right? Assuming that money is no object, which is a fair assumption. Money is no object. And you know he liked them and you know he likes poking the bear. If they didn't get money from him I would be amazed. I'll be amazed because their quality of the operation just went a long way up.
All right. You would like to have a reframe for how to get women. Do you think I can give this gentleman a reframe that will help him in his dating success? Yes I can. Yes I can. Here's your reframe. You're trying to find a woman. You're trying to find the right woman, right? And you're not finding the right connection. Stop looking for the right woman. Look for lots of people. You want to increase the number of people you're exposed to, not just looking for dates, just the total number of people who you are exposed to. And that's how you increase your odds. Because while I don't think it's necessarily true there's somebody for everybody — it probably isn't — but if your entire universe of people you're looking to get laid is three people, your odds are low. If suddenly you increase to 10 people you have 10 times better odds. But if you're not top 20, still low. If you know 100 people, well now you're talking. Now you're talking. There's somebody who's going to be looking at you too.
So the reframe is it's about numbers. It's not about necessarily just your quality. But I'm going to make a prediction. Whoever it is who just said you know you're having trouble getting women, I'm going to make a prediction that when you take your clothes off and you look in the full-length mirror, you're not delighted. Now I don't mean that as an insult, just a purely practical statement of cause and effect. If you go into the gym and you have a job, you're going to have some interest from the other sex. I know it's not fair. It's not a fair world. But get your body in shape.
All right. So here's — I might lose my power on the Locals feed because I'm getting a low battery message. So I can make that stop if I plug in instead of using the microphone, I guess. Oh yeah, I don't have the power for that. Never mind. Oh I do. Hold on. All right, Locals, you can lose the microphone but you're going to gain power. All right, so that's gaining power while you're here. Yeah, yeah, it helps to be tall. Yeah, but I don't know how many more times I can give this advice. Have you walked down the street lately and looked at your competition? I mean seriously, just go to the mall, go to any public place and just look around. See what you're competing with. What would it take to be in the top 10 percent of fitness for just the people you see around? Just look around. What would it take to be in the top 10 percent? Not much. Not much. Top 10 percent of fitness is the most achievable goal in the United States. I can't even imagine anything easier than that. Maybe falling off a bicycle. Maybe jumping in a mud puddle. That would be easier than being in the top 10 percent of fitness. It just means you tried. I don't even know if you could fail if you tried. You know what I mean? If you started at 400 pounds it's going to take you a while to get there. But unless you've let things go too far, it's not hard to get back into the top 10 percent. And why wouldn't you do that? It's the most controllable thing you can do. So control the hell out of what you can control. Just control everything you can control. So if you control your career stuff by training, making sure you're trained enough you can have a reasonable job, and you can control your fitness and your diet. Same thing. You're going to be in the top 10 percent.
You missed the part about blowing up pipes. You're late.
All right, so that's my statement. Am I obsessed with fitness? That's kind of body shaming too. Well I guess you could put a negative spin on everything, but I wouldn't say I'm obsessed by it. Oh yeah, I guess I am. Yeah, I'll actually accept it. Usually I don't like that "obsessed by" because it had a little judgment in it, but I think in this case I am obsessed by it and I should be. So I would like you to be obsessed by it as well. It's probably the best obsession I have.
Here's another hypothesis and reframe for you. You ready? You don't have an option of not being addicted. Let it go. Let it go. You do not have an option of not being addicted to something, I don't think. Now of course people are different. There's going to be somebody who's the exception to everything, so I'll give you that. But for the average person, you're going to be addicted to something. It's going to be sex, it's going to be food, it's going to be exercise, it's going to be the outdoors, it's going to be your animals, it's going to be your friends. Something. You're going to be addicted to something. So instead of saying I'll try to avoid all addictive things, you should go aggressively at trying to make yourself as addicted as possible to things that will be good for you.
So I'm addicted to exercise intentionally. I've done everything I could do to make myself addicted. I've given myself treats. I make sure I do things I like. I don't push myself too hard. I don't hurt myself too badly. I do everything you could do to make it a rewarding, literally rewarding. I do it at a time of day that it's going to be the best. It recharges me. I track how I feel on days I exercise versus I don't. It's a big difference. That helps me do it. I have a trick for going to the gym when I don't want to go to the gym. I've taught you this before. Put on your gym clothes, especially your footwear, and just having the right clothes on and walking around. I'm like, ah, well I might as well at least go for a short run. You know, I got my clothes on, right? So I do everything I can do to addict myself to a positive thing. So obsession actually is close enough to the right word. Desire and seeking is a human trait.
Okay, can I do some push-ups for you? Women look at men's shoes. Now there's a good tip.
Whoa, David Eagles just paid $50 to tell me that Narcan vending machines are being installed in cities. Hello. Here's what I'd like you to do. We're going to go save some lives. You ready? Now I said this last night in my man cave livestream but I'll do it again for you today. One of the things that this experience does, meaning this livestream that many of you come to every day, is that it's more than just some content I'm spraying out. We have formed an entity accidentally, sort of like an accidental organization in which we have a collaborative intelligence that can actually solve some problems. And one of the problems with fentanyl overdoses is bad information. So if you had better information you would know for example that Narcan is something you could get at your drugstore. And if you had it nearby and somebody was going into an overdose situation and you got there quickly — I don't know exactly how quickly it quickly is, but while they're still alive — and you administer it, and I guess you don't have to be an expert to administer it, it's pretty easy to do, the odds of them living are very good. It's actually very effective.
Now the number of people that are watching this, so we've got let's say 3,000 live here, 600 over here, probably 40, 50,000 people will catch this livestream. I'm going to ask all of you to do the following thing: research how you could get Narcan in your state because every state's different. In my state you can have the pharmacist write the prescription. I didn't even know that was a thing, right? So Carrie found that out and has also spread that news through San Diego State University. So because of this livestream, one active member went and figured out how you get Narcan in California. Just go ask for it and get a prescription from the pharmacist, not a doctor. And then she spread that information into a parent group at San Diego State University. Now the parent group was very active and they were all over it because there had been a couple of fentanyl scares just that week. So it was fresh in the parents' mind. Oh God, the people are dropping like flies even where my kid goes to school. Now I believe some number of them will get it for their kid to have at college or something.
Now there are also some apps. I think PulsePoint is one app that calls for people who know first aid, I believe. But I think within that umbrella you could call for people who, if you sign up for it, if you had Narcan I believe you would get notified if somebody had that app and saw somebody having an overdose because they'd be calling for anybody who had first aid and you'd have that, I believe.
So here's what I'm going to ask each of you to do. Get educated on how Narcan is obtained where you are and then tell your friends. If you have a place to spread the information, just spread the information. Because I don't see the government doing this. Correct me if I'm wrong, Joe Biden should go on television and say everybody should get Narcan or have it available. It's different in each state, so go figure out what it is in your state and see and just self-organize.
So I don't have mine yet but I'll get mine the way Carrie suggested. I'll go get mine and then when I have it, my neighborhood is organized so we have text messaging lists and stuff. So I'll send out a message to my neighbors and I'll tell them that I have it. So if anybody in my neighborhood has an overdose, there it is. And I'm also going to tell them that if I'm not home that I can open my garage door with my app and I'll just tell them where to get it. So if somebody can get to my house in five minutes — and all of my neighbors can — they can have Narcan in five minutes and maybe 10 minutes they're back to administer it if that's in time. And I think you do have 10 minutes. Does anybody know enough about this to know how often do you have enough warning that you can get to the Narcan? Do you know how much time you normally have there? I mean everything's different, right? But you're talking about just a few minutes, so you need it close.
Now I believe that if we do what some of you will do, because I know you take it seriously, some of you will do this, and I think we can save some lives. I believe that this livestream literally will save lives and you know I'm going to act on it. I hope you do too.
All right. How do you know if someone is overdosing on fentanyl? I don't know. You should research that as well. Usually you know because they've been taking opioids and somebody usually knows they've been taking them. And correct me if I'm wrong, it's for opioid overdose, not just fentanyl, right? Can somebody give me a fact check on that? Is the Narcan for — yeah it's for — so you don't need to know it's fentanyl. You need to know that opioids were involved or failing that you need to know that they're a person who might do opioids and you don't know what else they've done. So I think you might want to administer it in some cases if you're not sure. But again I'm not your doctor so don't believe anything I tell you about that. So that's what you need to look at and it probably says something on the box about when to use it, right? I would imagine it comes with instructions.
And Carrie Chabot is the one you need to thank for spreading that message. Yeah, all right. And then I think there's also something being contemplated about the Good Samaritan problem, that you would have legal liability if you help somebody and things go wrong. No problem giving it to someone who does not need it. We have somebody who seems to know what they're talking about, right? So you don't need to worry about if it's the wrong time to give it. You don't need to know if for sure it was fentanyl. It could have been an opioid and if they're still alive, give it to them, right? I guess that's the bottom line.
It's not looking good in Florida. So does anybody — how many of you are in Florida? And are you looking at a category five? Is that what I heard? And you're not leaving. Now for category five, do you stay? Do you stay home if it's category five? Grab a surfboard. Yeah, wow. Virginia also has training. Good. So it'll be a four or five, right? So the Santa says to hunker down. Basically a Cat 5. So you're close to five.
What if somebody wants to commit suicide by fentanyl? Well I don't know. Do you really need an answer for that? I mean that's sort of depends on the situation. Depends on the situation. But I can't imagine that you wouldn't try to bring it back.
All right. You won't get in trouble if you call for help even if you're on opioids yourself. That's true. That's true. Yeah, if you didn't know that, the emergency services, they're not going to arrest you. They're not calling the police because you have opioids in your system. That's not happening because they know that that would make everything worse. They're pretty good about that. I don't think you need to worry about that. I've never heard of anybody being in trouble because the ambulance picked them up. That's not a thing. I wouldn't want to have any on me, but even if you had it on you I feel like the medical community would not be turning you over to the police. I don't think so. What do you think? I mean there'll always be an exception, but I can't see the medics, even if they saw some illegal drugs, I think that they would just sort of leave them in your apartment when they took you. I just don't think they're taking those with them.
All right. Yeah, the cops do come but I don't think the cops are arresting you for having some possession if you're in the — I mean if you have a usable number of pills and you're having an overdose, I don't think they're arresting you. I don't think so. But I suppose I could be wrong. Don't know. Everything could be different.
All right. What presidents should say. You know I always find it obnoxious when people do the here's the letter that the president should write to make everything better and then you read it and you're like, ah no, not really. That's not really the letter they should write. It just feels like telling somebody like Trump what to say specifically is kind of obnoxious. Saying it generally like you know this would be a good phrase to use, then that makes sense.
Dear Putin, if I were your mother. Chloe mature said to vote Democrat and the hurricanes will disappear. Did you see Don Lemon trying to get the NASA guy to blame climate change for the hurricane? He couldn't get the NASA guy to bite. Any one hurricane could be attributed to climate change now, he did. You know the NASA guy didn't poo-poo climate change, but Don Lemon wanted to make it political and the NASA guy is just like it's a hurricane. He just wasn't having any of the politics. It was funny. Oh it wasn't NASA, it was a national NOAA. National what organization of blah blah.
All right, well I guess we don't believe any data anyway. I'm gonna go do something else and I think we saved some lives today. What do you think? Yeah, let's go save some lives. And get your mug. Erica, what's the latest mug count? How many mugs? That's right, you probably don't have that right now. I'll follow up with that later.
All right, that's all for today. Yeah, it was a light news day. It's all you needed today. That's all you needed. You didn't need anything else. All right, it's hit on your ex day. Okay, response to Tim Pool and Civil War. Well I don't know that it requires a response, but I guess the question would be if I thought that Republicans would be hunted, why would I think there would not be a civil war? And I just don't think that those two are very close. I think that the way the civil war will be is people will vote. Right? As long as a vote is coming up, you're not going to have a civil war. Yeah, you might have to worry like if somebody didn't like the vote, if it went poorly, things could get tense. But I don't see any situation where a civil war happens two years before an election in the United States. Do you? Especially when the other team looks like it's ahead in the polls. Nobody's going to start a hot war when they could wait two years and just vote in the other guy or other woman, right? And I think you just have to remind people of that and they'd be like, okay yeah. So individuals will defame and politicians will hunt Republicans, but that's a long way from the whole country wants to go to war with each other. There's nothing like that brewing.
Foreign wasn't meant like with a hunting license and an Elmer Fudd hat. Now exactly what is the diameter of the bottom of the mug? I don't know, but it's a 20-ounce mug. It's similar to the one that you see me use when I do the simultaneous sip.
What's that? You're not telling the truth and you're saying things that are killing people. What? What am I saying that's killing people? What?
All right. If you need a link to the mug, see my Twitter feed this morning. It's near the top. All right, that's all for now. YouTube, I'll talk to you tomorrow. Oh, I helped you in your last relationship with the reframe. Good bye for now.
do I see him unprepared well you're right you're gonna send this tweet and then you gotta send this tweet and I'll be right with you watching the cartoonist tweet that's the entertainment for the day boom boom all right everybody finally I'm here you know one of us was going to be late today and I'm glad it was me because you're all on time because you're awesome and you'd like to take it up a level and I think we can do that with a little thing called the simultaneous sip are you ready for the simultaneous all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tanker chalice is done a canteen jugular flask of vessel of any kind certainly with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the don't be here the day the thing makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sip it happens now go now if you didn't already know the official coffee with Scott Adams mug is available for pre-order who have a little drawing of my bald head on the front it'll have the simultaneous sip on the back and it will have the words ah on the bottom now you uh the link is uh you can see the link in my Twitter feed today and I have to tell you that the it turns out that the shipping and packing costs are the majority cost of the mug so it's a big old thick heavy mug so it's a you know a substantial mug but that the biggest cost is keeping it from being broken while they're shipping it so we we all wanted it to cost about half as much but unfortunately the shipping just eats that up and uh it's heavy ceramic and it will work on your coffee heater just fine I believe we have already have over over 70 of them have been ordered since I just tweeted it we should be blowing through our minimum guarantee pretty soon and uh all right you order two good good um I guess I need to order mine I need to get one too all right well I'm going to start with the best story of the day so CNN had X CIA director Brennan to talk about the Ukraine situation and he notes that Russia seems to be losing losing everything and it's all falling apart for Russia and uh he believes that Russia sabotaged the nordstream 2 pipeline which is Russia's own pipeline now it had been turned off already so they'd turned it off so it wasn't delivering any gas uh so although it was not delivering any gas John Brennan thinks that uh Putin blew it up to really send a strong signal to the the west and I think it did now a lot of people don't know where he got where Putin got that strategy of blowing up his own assets it's originally there was a military genius who came up with this first it's sort of non-obvious right you're like why why would you blow up your own valuable asset but no it came from this is actually a military Doctrine it's it's more obvious than things so there was a famous military strategist named Mel Brooks and in his military treaties uh treatis Treatise Treatise it was called I believe it's called Blazing Saddles and there's a scene in there in which we learn to you hold a gun to yourself and you threaten to kill yourself Sometimes using you know unpleasant language if you threaten to kill yourself then people won't kill you like okay I I'm gonna kill this person okay Mel Brooks Used different language so I think is really it looks like the Mel Brooks play I think Putin is uh threatening to destroy all of his assets maybe one at a time if if we don't give him what he wants um so that seems quite reasonable uh John Brennan now talk about a credible guy John Brennan was one of the people who helped collect the 50 Intel prior and current Intel people who who said that the Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation yeah he's also the same John Brennan who pushed the Russia collusion Oaks but there's no reason to believe that he's lying this time when he says that Russia attacked itself to teach us a lesson and let me tell you I feel it I feel a little bit closer to maybe Ukraine will have to surrender I mean if Russia keeps bombing its own assets I don't know if any of us are safe I mean what if Putin decides to bomb Moscow next what are we going to do would Ukraine Just Surrender I mean the strategy looks pretty strong so yeah Russia will be attacking itself because attacking Russia or I'm sorry attacking Ukraine didn't work out at all uh I think Putin needed to win he's like okay have we attacked anything successfully lately ooh you know the uh the news from the Don Bass not so good not so good okay we need to have some kind of a win can you please attack something successfully I need to be able to say we attacked something and we got it we got the wind well you know the ukrainians are really dug in don't tell me what you can't do I need a win you need to blow something up and I need to be able to say that I got that thing you know we're running out of weapons and our soldiers are not really well no no I need you to blow something up and give me a win well you know the only thing we could actually blow up would be our own stuff I don't need to know the details just give me a wind so then the Russian general said all right what's the least protected thing we owned and they thought our pipeline we could blow that damn pipeline up so Putin gets the win for a successful military operation against its own pipeline according to John Brennan has he ever lied to us I mean you can trust John Brennan right I mean just because he ran an organization whose entire job is lying to us and he's documented as the biggest liar in American politics Bar None bar none but this time he's totally uh telling the truth but the funniest thing was watching I think it was uh Keeler uh on CNN who asked Brennan uh why he thinks that Putin blew up his own pipeline to teach the West the lesson when the pipeline they could just turn it off she was like you could just turn it off you have to blow it up uh then I saw some speculation that really it was a clever trick and the and that Brennan is right and here's why they blew it up because if Putin had not blown it up he might be legally required to turn it on later to fulfill legal contracts so to get out of his legal contracts later he blew up his own pipeline now if there's one thing that we know is true Putin is very concerned about his legal agreements and he would be willing to bomb his entire country so that people didn't think he'd be the kind of guy who'd say one thing and then do another because that's not the kind of reputation you could have out there perfectly reasonable perfectly reasonable because you know prior to knowing that Putin was bombing his own pipeline according to John Brennan I didn't know if Putin was trustworthy or not you know I didn't know if you could depend on him to keep a deal but now that I know he would be willing to bomb his own assets to get out of a deal well I trust him more and I think that's what he was going for he was going for some kind of a business credibility kind of a play and I think when you see somebody blow up their own assets so they don't have to deliver what they promised that makes me trust them so so I think this hypothesis that Russia is behind the blowing up of their own asset completely feasible completely I buy it yup totally believable now as a backdrop to this and don't make too much of a big deal about this because we know what the story is we know Russia blew up their own assets because John Brennan would never lie to us on CNN that's something we know for sure but some people you know there's always some Rogue there's always something like goofy bastard who's got some conspiracy theory right so here's the conspiracy that's going around now there's a video of Joe Biden before the Ukraine invasion saying in public I know it's ridiculous but saying in public in the clearest possible terms that if Russia invaded those pipelines were no longer going to be functional now some people say that matters and the fact that he directly that Biden directly said if you do this we're going to take care of those pipelines and he gave you a smile that looked exactly like he meant blowing them up because there's a smile that says I mean blowing them up right you have to see the video here's how you talk if you don't mean blowing them up uh Mr.
Biden are you saying that you're gonna you know shut down those pipelines yes we'll we'll use whatever means we can we're going to shut down those pipelines okay that's how you say it if you don't mean we're going to blow them up here's how you here's how Biden said it so how will you do it I promise you we can do it now that's pretty much the blow it up face isn't it I mean I think he told us he's going to blow him up and then they blew up now to me this looks like nothing but giant energy companies uh manipulating our government to reduce the competitiveness of their competitor that literally is all I see here do you see anything except a giant Energy company has control of our military and the military is doing the bidding of some Energy company in the United States that's what it looked like to me it looked like it literally was a commercial a commercial operation to increase the prophets of American gas companies now I think that's the reason it happened also maybe has some military you know Homeland European protection whatever I mean that might be good too but you know when follow the money works this well if you can follow the money this directly I don't know if you need to ask any about their questions I mean to me to me this doesn't even look like a national interest so much as just a Energy company interest now you could argue and I'm going to argue this that when the United States supports its energy industry even doing things that you might think are over the line or sketchy or too far or whatever that the United States does better you know that there are a lot of smart people who say basically look at the the energy situation of any country and you know everything you need to know that's pretty close to true isn't it if you've got a country that has cheap energy or is a major producer of energy they seem to always be doing fine so if you take care of your energy business your country is going to be a strong country if you don't take care of your energy business and you have to buy energy from other people and that's all you have you're just a buyer of energy you're going to be very vulnerable so um I'm not sure that it is the wrong that is wrong for the country to do things that are literally just good for big energy companies in the United States no it's it's like you know it's creepy and it's unethical and it's it's not free markets you could find a hundred ethical and moral reasons why we shouldn't do it easily right it's not it wouldn't take any effort at all at the same time having our government and our Energy company is basically being one entity and working for each other's benefit actually kind of works kind of works yeah I I mean I don't like it but strangely it works all right um can we can we do this next conversation without without some of you just flying out of control okay see if I can just get through this next two minutes without somebody just going nuts on me okay so there's the there's a trending hashtag for face masks no I hate face masks I am anti-face Max I hate them and we're not going to talk about the science however it is trending again because cases are up and and people are pushing for her face masks again now in this context some doctor uh some doctor tweeted the studies that he says support face masks I retweeted it with a comment on just the messenger now the way you should take that when I say I'm just the messenger that means I'm not endorsing it that's how you should interpret it if I say hey look at this this looks pretty solid then I'm probably endorsing it or at least I think there's nothing wrong with it but if I say I'm just the messenger you should very clearly see that I'm just telling you whether other people are saying so you know because I had always wondered why it is that the people on the right say there are no there are no studies that support masks and the people on the left say there are tons of them they're all over the place have you ever wondered about that like why could it both be true that there are tons of studies saying they work at the same time there are no studies to say they work and both be true so I think I think maybe I have something close to an answer which is this list of studies it was sort of a study about other studies of masks it it took about 10 seconds for you know Andre's back house and other people who know about data to just rip it about is ridiculous so apparently this study happened at the very beginning of the pandemic when all of our data was bad and basically it was just a use it was a bunch of useless studies they were summed up by another useless study now if you were non-critical and you saw that there were a whole bunch of studies in the same direction what would you do if you were not very let's say sophisticated about how people lie with data I think it would be pretty convincing now let me stop again because I know a whole bunch of people are flying crazy at home no I'm anti-mask and I have been from the start but the conversation about it is part of the context of America so I can't avoid it so I think I think that's the I think the entire thing comes down to this I think the entire thing comes down to the people on the left believe the studies because there are lots of them but the people on the right don't believe the studies because when you look at them they don't seem credible you know they just don't seem to be a time period and it doesn't look like they could untangle all the confounders you know all the variables that could affect them I mean the most obvious thing is that the people who are likely to wear masks have something in common with each other right and the country is most likely to do it they probably have something in common as a country so I just don't know that you can sort it out I also don't believe that they would have kept in the study anything that said the opposite right because when you do a study of studies let's say a meta study or even just a study of studies which would be different you're you are deciding what's in and what's out what they never do is throw everything in because they always say well you know this one is so big you don't want to put this one in there it'll skew things or they'll say this one is so low quality that even though the other ones are higher quality you know we'll throw it out so so those studies end up being subjective accidentally some meta studies are well made some are not right and usually we can't tell the difference can't tell the difference all right so is everybody comfortable that I'm anti-mask period period anti-mask but now you understand why the left believes they work because there are people sending studies around it is sort of the laundry list thing if there are enough studies it doesn't matter that they're all bad because there are lots of them so I think that's the whole story anyway um so the the January 6th gasolators this this just amazes me because every once in a while you have to go back and and shake your head at this the entire January 6 situation depends on one assumption more than one but one that I care about and the one assumption is what Trump actually believed am I right because if Trump believed the election was genuinely fake then why he did make sense actually it would make sense as a candidate and it would make sense as a patriot it would make sense as an American if he genuinely believed the vote was hanky now the entire January 6th thing depends on him depends on his critics knowing what he really secretly thought that he has never said out loud to anybody that we have any evidence of so here's Trump the person who says everything he thinks am I right Trump is the person who says everything he thinks and yet there's no evidence whatsoever in writing any reports any not even Anonymous reports of trump ever being inconsistent with his belief that the election was sketchy so why is it that the most unrealistic assumption is underpinning the entire thing and we don't pay attention to that I feel like I'm the only one who's ever mentioned this actually ever have you ever seen anybody else say everything depends on what he was thinking and if you were to make two hypotheses of what he was thinking do you think there's really any chance that you thought the election was um Fair because he was he was thinking the same thing that most of the Dem most of the Republicans thought don't you believe that most Republicans thought it was sketchy most I think most did so if he had the same opinion that's most Republicans who had the same information he had we were all just watching TV right he didn't have like secret you know secret Intel he was just watching TV like the rest of us so if he watched TV and you watched TV and you said to yourself that doesn't look like a fair election to me I don't know if you're right or wrong but say that was your opinion why would you think he wouldn't have that opinion like what what is what possible argument could you make that he would singularly believe the election was fair when everybody was looking at exactly the same information at the same time all the people on his side said I'm not so sure if that election was fair and of course you know doing the the most obvious analysis you can do did the Democrats think the election was fair did Hillary think the election was fair when Trump won the first time no the most the most um common believable and ordinary assumption you can make about this situation as well as when Hillary lost the most common ordinary assumption is that the people who lost genuinely believe there's some question about the outcome they genuinely believe it now if I were Trump's team that's the only thing I would talk about I say are you making the case that you believe the president actually thought he lost when nobody else thought that now it's separate from the argument of whether he really lost so you know their trick is to argue whether or not it's true whether or not it's true that the election was fair has nothing to do with this because nobody was operating on the truth because it was unknowable there was a suspicion but at that time it was pretty hard to know what was true and what wasn't if you were biased toward thinking the election was rigged as the Democrats were when they lost as Republicans are when they lost as the Democrats will be again if they lose you don't think the Democrats are going to say the election was rigged if they lose the next election of course they will do you think they'll believe it yes yes I do I do think they'll believe it that's how it works so now am I Wrong Am I Wrong that everything follows from that assumption am I missing anything the entire understanding of that day has everything to do with what Trump secretly actually believed about the election because if he believed that that was rigged and he didn't do a thing about it I wouldn't vote for him would you I mean I don't vote anyway but but seriously if he believed it it actually been rigged and he did nothing didn't complain about it just sort of you know slunk off to his retirement he wouldn't be the person you you thought you voted for the first time if he did and I'm not sure you'd want any president to be like that I mean I want my president to say what he believes and to act on it and uh Saturday defense it wouldn't be an insanity defense because most Republicans believe there was some problem with the election now just to be clear so I don't get banned I'm not aware of any proof of election irregularity as scale I'm not aware of any but would I be I'm not sure I would be yeah he told them to go down and peacefully protest now he did he did of course want to do wanted Pence to delay things and there are smart people who say that wasn't legal and you can't do that and I guess that's the bipartisan bill that even even Schumer is willing to say something about the the electoral votes you don't want to play with them after the election and that's probably I haven't looked at it but probably a good idea I mean if it's bipartisan probably a good idea all right um it was the most perfect election of all time well I've said many times that it's a miracle that all 50 of our election systems work perfectly we are told and yet every other organization and system that we know about is completely corrupt which we know and for sure you don't have to wonder you know we know that now is the FBI corrupt yeah yeah yeah we know that that there's no longer in question all right uh have I complained too many times about how my critics like to come into my men into my tweets and compare me to Garfield and other comics and it's usually it looks like this oh uh the Garfield guy again or here comes the Beetle Bailey guy to say something and it took me a while to figure out that these were compliments their attempts their attempts at insults but you know do you see what they get wrong it took me a while to notice why is it that it's an insult to call me Garfield what makes that an insult it makes it an insult because the person saying it believes that everybody who sees that understands that Garfield is a less Good comic than Dilbert right Am I Wrong the reason they would call me these other cartoons the whole point of it is they believe the other cartoons are of lesser equality yeah you know what they don't call me peanuts they don't call me um they don't call me Calvin and Hobbes although I have seen that but that's that's rare do you know why because my my critics believe that those two Comics are unambiguously better than Dilbert so do I I mean I mean most people would agree with that so they call me the Lesser comics because the whole point of it is that they're not as good as my comic and every time it happens now I'm thinking I feel like you just complimented me because this wouldn't even make sense the entire point of the insult is that that other comic is a lower quality than than mine yeah Kathy Etc now I'm not saying that they're lower quality I'm saying that that's the whole point of people saying it is that they believe they're lower quality so thank you for the thank you for the compliments I appreciate it keep them coming here are some things that I read about myself uh in the fall in the past week so if you wonder Scott do you ever get much trouble online do you ever get bothered by things that people say to you online well not that much but uh here's some things I got called this week uh a holocaust denier uh and uh um it is alleged that I believe that rape is okay because it's natural that that's actually a widespread opinion about me on the internet is a widespread opinion that I believe that rape's fine it's just natural somebody actually thinks that was my opinion or is my opinion okay um fine and people also believe that I'm an anti-mass Crusader who is secretly trying to get you to all wear masks so at the same time that I'm one of the most notable critics of masks spend a lot of time notably talking about not wearing my mask and required masking places trying to mobilize people to get rid of their masks and so that makes me Pro mask if they read my mind they can see that like on the inside even though on the outside I'm totally anti-mask but on the inside they can they can see that because of the things I tweet they can tell they can tell that because even though I don't wear a mask because I'm so afraid that I'm really Pro masked um so there are books coming out more books about Trump of course and uh they're running out of insults the every book that comes out about Trump they've got to have a new you know thing but they're running out of the good ones so here's some new books and it doesn't matter who who wrote them right it doesn't matter at this point it wouldn't matter if it's Maggie Haberman or somebody else but these are somebody else but they're in the news today so one of the things is that Trump was way more serious about buying Greenland that you knew he was actually really serious about buying Greenland and he made an argument that you know it's it's sort of close to our domain and would be valuable to us and you know Denmark wasn't using it for much anyway but apparently he actually negotiated with Denmark to some degree he was actually trying to get it now is that a criticism is it a criticism that Trump literally tried to buy Greenland that feels like the opposite of a criticism don't they have valuable minerals isn't it geopolitically you know geostrategically important ah I mean that that should have been framed as a compliment now the fact that it didn't happen is that is that an insult or is that a criticism no it was a long shot it was a long shot that cost him nothing except embarrassment and he was willing to take the embarrassment for the potential of maybe having an upside that would be amazing I mean again it looks like a criticism that's more of a compliment I want the president who does that all right here's another one here's another criticism they have to say I don't know is that really a criticism one of the books claims that Trump was way more serious than you thought about withdrawing from NATO is that a criticism what would be happening in Ukraine right right now well I don't know but it wouldn't be costing us money um I don't know maybe Ukraine would have just rolled over and Putin would own Ukraine and we wouldn't have known the difference and we'd be getting our Ukrainian wheat and Europe would be getting their stuff and ukrainians uh corrupt government would be putting out of business and they would go back to sort of how things used to be you were you know Russia dominated that country now that would be bad for the ukrainians I mean I guess they would say that I don't know maybe someone but can we say that Trump was wrong about withdrawing from NATO based on what we know today it's actually not obvious is it you could certainly make the case that it's a good thing we're in NATO it's the only thing to stop Putin and that would be a strong argument but you could also make the case that maybe none of this would look this way if he had pulled that in NATO and and Putin didn't feel threatened the other possibility is that Putin wouldn't feel threatened by having NATO on his doorstep if America was not part of NATO I mean everything would have looked different wouldn't it so I don't know you know I'm not saying it would have been a good idea to pull on a NATO that's not my opinion but it's not obvious which was the right right way to go which is not obvious now I think that also when he talks about pulling out of NATO that's that could have been a negotiating position as well so he may have been really serious about pulling out if the other countries didn't step up with money you get that right he could be totally serious about pulling out if you don't give us more money but then other countries gave more money so I don't know if he still was still as adamant about pulling out but I think he was serious if they didn't give more money which I would have agreed with actually I think you did have to threaten to pull out if they didn't cough up more money I think that part was right and then his age worried that he might try to start a war with Iran or North Korea because of his crazy ways neither of those things were even close he wasn't close to a war with Iran it wasn't even close I don't think was he I didn't say anything that looked even close it looked like he was just gonna you know boycott them forever or whatever and what about North Korea North Korea is one of his success stories he took the temperature away down in North Korea I mean what was he going to do nuke North Korea his friend so the the books have completely run out of material uh think about his legal troubles correct me if I'm wrong but not counting January 6 for which no indictments are likely to come say the experts his biggest legal risk at the moment correct me if I'm wrong because it might be what I'm missing is a civil case against Trump the company not even against Trump himself so not Criminal and not even against Trump am I right that's his biggest risk right now and what is what is the power of the case the entire case let me summarize it the Trump company handled their accounting the way all normal companies do that's it that's the case they did things exactly the way normal companies do they they took the highest number they thought they could get away with when valuing it for loans and then they got allowed and then they paid back the loan and then the bank was happy but when they were doing their property tax assessments you want the lowest number you can get away with there he went the opposite way like everybody like everybody now he may have exaggerated or the Trump company may have exaggerated more than other companies do and that would be worth discussing but no matter what it is it's going to be a civil fine it's not exactly the crime of the century to have exaggerated more when you are the company that exaggerates more and your entire business model is built on your brand right the Trump brand is the value of the business and so would you expect somebody whose entire business model is about telling people their brand is better than maybe it is this is a little business model so if he did it consistently everywhere he told everybody that he was better than better than maybe somebody else thinks I don't know it might be a crime likely you might be able to find a jury who says yeah that's slightly a crime that's a little bit more exaggerating than I think you should have done so maybe you should pay a fine that is just business as usual for every company every big company that gets audited do you think they get away from the audit with nothing do you think there's nothing just pick a company just pick any company pick Google do you think if Google got audited they'd end up paying nothing sometimes Maybe but it's very common that a you know traditional company gets audited and pays a little extra money because they exaggerated something that's how it happens they exaggerate stuff or minimize things yeah so just just think about the fact that what the remaining complaints about Trump I've all just kind of dissolved so the January 6th thing has turned into nothing they're trying to breathe some life into it with the you know the jaws of life today I guess so they're trying to make the nothing into something but January 6 proved there was nothing at least nothing of criminal and dateable quality now all of his other legal problems have gone away except that trivial one that really is nothing what's left what's left anything so he wasn't colluding with Russia I mean what's left the only thing left is how his performance would be compared to Biden now of course Democrats look at Biden and say yeah he's killing it he's doing great and Republicans say the opposite uh although they have the lady who claimed that he raped her in a dressing room in a group in a store Gene Carroll so I guess she's doing her lawsuit again but nobody thinks that's going anywhere right that isn't that just a he said she said situation that's the end of it on Twitter today must said he would discuss buying into Rumble oh did that really happen did that really happen holy what's the price of uh rum right now can somebody check the stock price so rum was 12 yesterday or this morning oh he was asked to and he declined oh come on all right he was asked about it and he declined what don't get me all excited about that now um you know the reason I'm excited is because I'm an investor so I invested in the locals platform which got combined with Rumble so I ended up accidentally with some rumble stock which turned out to be the the best accidental investment I ever made yeah rum is worth a shot nicely done rum is worth a shot okay well done all right um question how many of you think that Elon Musk is secretly bankrolling The Babylon bee because if you notice that the Babylon bees uh let's say their budget seems to be way better than it used to be the quality of their content and and also the volume of it is suspiciously very good now it's not suspicious that they're good because you know they're good but you know you saw Elon Musk met with them obviously they got along they have some kind of connection the founders of the Babylon Bay now wouldn't that be the number one most likely thing you would ever expect you'd expect him to secretly bankroll it just because it's funny if I had his money nothing would have kept me from giving some of it to the Babylon B am I right assuming that money is No Object which is a fair assumption money is No Object and you know he liked them and you know you know he likes you know he likes poking the bear if they didn't get money from him I would be amazed I'll be amazed because that they're they're uh quality of the operation just went long way up all right um you would like to have a reframe for how to get women do you think I can give this gentleman a reframe that will help him in his dating success yes I can yes I can you're here's your reframe you're trying to find a woman uh you're trying to find the right woman right and you're not finding right the right connection stop looking for the right woman look for lots of people you want to increase the number of people you're exposed to not just looking for dates just the total number of people who you were exposed to and that's how you increase your odds because well I don't think it's necessarily true there's somebody for everybody it probably isn't but if your entire universe of people you're looking to get laid is three people your odds are low if suddenly you increase to 10 people you have to have sex with a little bit better but if you're not you know top 20 still low if you know 100 people well now you're talking now you're talking there's somebody who's going to be looking at you too so the reframe is it's about numbers it's not about necessarily just your quality but I'm going to make a prediction whoever is it whoever it is who just said you know you're having trouble getting women I'm going to make a prediction that when you take your clothes off and you look in the full-length mirror you're not delighted now I don't mean that as an insult just a purely practical statement of cause and effect if you go into the gym and you have a job you're going to have some interest from the other sex I know it's not fair it's not a fair world but get your body in shape all right so here's uh I might lose my power on the locals feed because I'm I'm getting a low battery message so I can make that stop if I plug you in instead of instead of using the microphone I guess oh yeah I don't have I don't have the power for that never mind oh I do hold on all right locals you can lose the microphone but you're going to gain power all right so that's the uh gaining Powers while you're here yeah yeah it helps to be tall yeah but I I don't know how many more times I can give this advice have you walked down the street lately and looked at your competition I mean seriously just go to the mall go to any any public place and just look around see what you're competing with what would it take to be in the top 10 percent of fitness for just the people you see around just just look around what would it take to be in the top 10 percent not much not much top 10 percent of fitness is the most achievable goal in the United States I can't even imagine anything easier than that maybe falling off a bicycle right maybe jumping in a mud puddle that would be easier than but being in the top 10 percent of Fitness just means you tried I don't even know if you could fail if you tried you know I mean if you started at 400 pounds it's going to take you a while to get there but unless you're a grossly you know you've let things go too far it's not hard to get back into the top 10 percent and why wouldn't you do that it's the most controllable thing you can do so control the hell out of what you can control yeah just control control everything you can control so if you controlled you know your career stuff by training making sure you're trained enough you can have a reasonable job and you can control your Fitness and your diet same thing you're going to be in the top 10 percent you missed the part about blowing up pipes you're late all right so that's my statement uh uh am I obsessed with Fitness that's kind of body shaming too well I guess you could put a negative spin on everything but I'm I wouldn't say I'm obsessed by it oh yeah I guess I am yeah I'll actually accept your I'll accept it usually I don't like that obsessed by because I had a little judgment in it but I think I think in this case I am obsessed by it and I should be so I would like you to be obsessed by it as well it's probably the best Obsession I have here here's another hypothesis and reframe for you you ready you don't have an option of not being addicted Let It Go Let It Go you do not have an option of not being addicted to something I don't think now of course people are different there's going to be some somebody who's the exception to everything so I'll give you that but for the average person you're going to be addicted to something it's going to be sex it's going to be food it's going to be exercise it's going to be the outdoors it's going to be your animals it's going to be your friends something you're gonna be addicted to something so instead of saying I'll try to avoid all addictive things you should go aggressively at at trying to make yourself as addicted as possible to things that will be good for you so I'm addicted to exercise intentionally I've done everything I could do to make myself addicted I've given myself treats I make sure I do things I like I don't push myself too hard I don't hurt myself too badly I do everything you could do to make it a rewarding literally rewarding I do it at a time of day that it's going to be the best it recharges me you know I I track how I feel on days I exercise versus I don't it's a big difference that helps me do it I have a trick for going to the gym when I don't want to go to the gym I've taught you this before put on your gym clothes especially your your Footwear and just having the right clothes on and walking around I'm like ah well I might as well at least go for a short run you know I got my clothes on right so I do everything I can do to addict myself to a positive thing so Obsession actually is close enough to the right word desire and seeking is human trait okay can I do some push-ups for you women look at men's shoes now there's a good tip whoa David Eagles just paid fifty dollars to tell me that Narcan vending machines are being installed in cities hello here's what I'd like you to do we're going to go save some lives you ready now I said this last night in my man cave live stream but I'll do it again for you today one of the things that this experience does meaning this live stream that many of you come to every day is that it's more than just some content I'm spraying out we have formed a an entity accidentally sort of like an accidental organization in which we can we have a collaborative intelligence that can actually solve some problems and one of the problems with uh fentanyl overdoses is bad information so if you had better information you would know for example that Narcan is something you could get at your drugstore and if you had it nearby and somebody was going into overdose situation and you got there quickly I don't know exactly how quickly it quickly is but while they're still alive and you administer it and I guess you don't have to be an expert to administer it it's pretty easy to do the odds of them living are very good it's actually very effective now the number of people that are watching this so we've got let's say 3 000 live here 600 over here probably 40 50 000 people will catch this live stream I'm going to ask all of you to do the following thing research how you could get Narcan in your state because every every State's different in my state you can have the pharmacist write the prescription I didn't even know that was a thing right so uh Carey found that out and has also spread that news through San Diego State University so because of this live stream one active member uh went and figured out how you get Narcan in California just go ask for it and get a prescription from the prescription from the pharmacist not a doctor and then she spread that information into a a parent group as San Diego State University now the parent group was very active and they were all they were all over it because there had been a couple of fentanyl scares just that week so it was like fresh in the parents mind oh God the people are dropping like flies even where my kid goes to school now they were I believe some number of them will get um will get it for their kid to have at college or something now there are also some apps I think uh pulse point is one app that calls for people who know first aid I believe but I think within that umbrella you could call for people who who if you sign up for it uh if you had Narcan I believe you would get notified if somebody had that app and saw somebody having an overdose because they'd be calling for anybody who had first aid and you'd have that I believe so here's what I'm going to ask each of you to do get educated on on how Narcan is obtained Where You Are and then tell your friends if you have a place to spread the information just spread the information because I don't see the government doing this correct me if I'm wrong Joe Biden should go on television and say everybody should get Narcan or have it available it's different in each state so go figure it out what it is in your state and see and just self-organize so I don't have mine yet but I'll I'll get mine the way Carrie suggested I'll go get mine and then when I have it my my neighborhood is organized so we have you know text messaging lists and stuff so I'll send out a what's that message to my neighbors and I'll tell them that I have it so if they if anybody in my neighborhood has an overdose there it is and I'm also going to tell them that if I'm not home that I can open my garage door with my app and I'll just tell them where to get it so if somebody can get to my house and five minutes and all of my neighbors can they can have Narcan in five minutes and maybe 10 minutes they're back to administrate if that's in time and I think I think you do have 10 minutes does anybody know enough about this to know how often do you have enough warning that you can get to the Narcan do you know how much time you normally have there I mean everything's different right but you're talking about just a few minutes so you need it close now I believe that if we do what what some of you will do because I know you take it seriously some of you will do this and I think we can save some lives I believe that this live stream literally will save lives and you know I'm going to act on it I hope you do too all right how do you know if someone is overdosing on fentanyl I don't know you should research that as well usually you know because they've been taking opioids and somebody usually knows they've been taking them and correct me if I'm wrong it's for opioid overdose not just fentanyl right can somebody give me a fact check on that is the Narcan for yeah it's for so you don't need to know it's Fentanyl you need to know that opioids were involved or failing in that you need to know that they're a person who might do opioids and you don't know what else they've done so I think you might want to administer it in some cases if you're not sure but again I'm not your doctor so don't believe anything I tell you about that so that's what you need to look at and it probably says something on the Box about when to use it right I would imagine it comes with instructions and uh Carrie Chabot is the one you need to thank for spreading that message yeah all right and then I think there's also something being contemplated about the Good Samaritan problem that you would have legal liability if you help somebody and things go wrong no problem giving it to someone who does not need it we have we have the somebody who seems to know what they're talking about right so you don't need to worry about if it's the wrong time to give it you don't need to know if for sure it was fentanyl it could have been in the opioid and if they're still alive give it to them right I guess that's the I guess that's the bottom line uh it's not looking good in Florida so does anybody how many of you are in Florida and uh are you looking at a category five is that what I heard and you're not leaving now for category five do you do you do you stay do you stay home if it's category five grab a surfboard yeah wow Virginia also has training good so it'll be a four or five right so the Santa says to hunker down uh basically a CAT5 so you're close to five what if somebody wants to commit suicide by a fentanyl well I don't know do you really need an answer for that I mean that's sort of a depends the situation depends on the situation but I can't imagine that you wouldn't try to bring it back all right um you won't get in trouble if you call for help even if you're on opioids yourself that's true that's true yeah if you didn't know that the uh the Emergency Services they're not going to arrest you yeah they're not calling the police because you have opioids in your system that's not happening because they know that that would make everything worse that's they're pretty good about that I don't think you need to worry about that I've never heard of anybody being in trouble because the ambulance picked them up that's not a thing I wouldn't want to have any on me but even if you had it on you I feel like the medical community would not be turning you over to the police I don't think so what do you think I mean there'll always be an exception but I can't see the Medics even if they saw some illegal drugs I think that they would just sort of you know leave them in your apartment when they took you I just don't think they're taking those with them uh all right yeah the cops do come but I don't think the cops are arresting you for having some possession if you're in the I mean if you have a user number of pills and you're having an overdose I don't think they're arresting you I don't think so but I I suppose I could be wrong don't know everything could be different all right uh do what presidents should say Cass you know I I always find it obnoxious when people do the uh here's the letter that the President should write to make everything better and then you read it and you're like ah no not really that's not really the letter they should write it just feels like telling somebody like Trump what to say specifically is kind of obnoxious saying it generally like you know this would be a good phrase to use then that makes sense dear Putin if I were your mother right Khloe mature said to vote Democrat and the Hurricanes will disappear did you see Don Lemon trying to get the NASA guy to blame climate change for the hurricane he couldn't get the NASA guy to to bite any one hurricane could be attributed to climate change now he did you know the NASA guy didn't poo poo climate change but uh Don Lemon wanted to make it political and the NASA guy is just like it's a hurricane he just wasn't having any of the politics it was funny oh it was uh it wasn't NASA it was a national NOAA National what organization of blah blah uh up all right well I guess we don't believe any data anyway I'm gonna go do something else and uh I think we saved some lives today what do you think yeah let's go save some lives and get your uh get your mug Erica what's the latest bug count how many mugs that's right you probably don't have that right now I'll follow up with that later all right that's all for today yeah it was a lot light news day it's all you needed today that's all you needed you didn't need anything else all right it's hit on your ex day okay response to Tim pool and Civil War um well I don't know that it requires a response but I guess the question would be if I thought that Republicans would be hunted why would I think there would not be a civil war and I just don't think that those two are very close I think that the way the Civil War will be is people will vote right as long as a vote is coming up you're not going to have a civil war yeah you might have to worry like if somebody didn't like the vote if it went poorly things could get tense but I don't see any situation where a civil war happens two years before an election in the United States do you especially when the other team looks like it's ahead in the polls nobody's going to start a hot War when they could wait two years and just vote in the other guy or other woman right and I I think you just have to remind that remind people of that and they'd be like okay yeah so individuals will def and politicians will hunt Republicans but that's a long way from the whole country wants to you know go to war with each other there's nothing like that Brewing foreign wasn't meant like with a hunting license and an Elmer fun hat now exactly what is the diameter of the bottom of the mug I don't know but it's a 20 ounce mug it's similar to the one that you see me use in the you know when I do the simultaneous sip what's that uh you're not telling the truth and you're saying things that are killing people what what am I saying that's killing people what all right um if you need a link to the mug see my Twitter feed this morning it's near the top all right uh that's all for now You.
Tube I'll talk to you tomorrow oh I helped you in your last relationship with the reframe good bye for now
do I see him unprepared
well you're right you're gonna send this
tweet and then
you gotta send this tweet and I'll be
right with you
watching the cartoonist tweet that's the
entertainment for the day
boom
boom
all right everybody
finally I'm here
you know
one of us was going to be late today and
I'm glad it was me because you're all on
time because you're awesome and you'd
like to take it up a level and I think
we can do that with a little thing
called the simultaneous sip are you
ready for the simultaneous all you need
is a cup or a mug or a glass of tanker
chalice is done a canteen jugular flask
of vessel of any kind
certainly with your favorite liquid
I like coffee
and join me now for the unparalleled
pleasure of the don't be here the day
the thing makes everything better it's
called the simultaneous sip
it happens now go
now if you didn't already know
the official coffee with Scott Adams mug
is available for pre-order
who have a little drawing of my bald
head on the front
it'll have the simultaneous sip on the
back
and it will have the words ah on the
bottom
now
you uh the link is uh you can see the
link in my Twitter feed today
and I have to tell you that the it turns
out that the shipping and packing costs
are the majority cost of the mug so it's
a big old thick heavy mug so it's a you
know a substantial mug but that the
biggest cost is keeping it from being
broken while they're shipping it
so we we all wanted it to cost about
half as much but unfortunately the
shipping just eats that up
and uh it's heavy ceramic and it will
work on your coffee heater just fine I
believe we have already have over over
70 of them have been ordered since I
just tweeted it
we should be blowing through our minimum
guarantee pretty soon
and uh all right you order two good good
um I guess I need to order mine I need
to get one too
all right well I'm going to start with
the best story of the day
so CNN had X CIA director Brennan to
talk about the Ukraine situation
and he notes that Russia seems to be
losing losing everything and it's all
falling apart for Russia
and uh he believes that Russia
sabotaged the nordstream 2 pipeline
which is Russia's own pipeline
now it had been turned off already so
they'd turned it off so it wasn't
delivering any gas
uh so although it was not delivering any
gas
John Brennan thinks that uh Putin blew
it up
to really send a strong signal
to the the west and I think it did now a
lot of people don't know where he got
where Putin got that strategy of blowing
up his own assets
it's originally there was a military
genius who came up with this first it's
sort of non-obvious right you're like
why why would you blow up your own
valuable asset
but no it came from this is actually a
military Doctrine it's it's more obvious
than things so there was a famous
military strategist named Mel Brooks
and in his military treaties uh treatis
Treatise Treatise it was called I
believe it's called Blazing Saddles
and there's a scene in there in which we
learn to you hold a gun to yourself
and you threaten to kill yourself
Sometimes using you know unpleasant
language if you threaten to kill
yourself then people won't kill you
like okay I I'm gonna kill this person
okay Mel Brooks Used different language
so I think is really it looks like the
Mel Brooks play I think Putin is uh
threatening to destroy all of his assets
maybe one at a time if if we don't give
him what he wants
um
so that seems quite reasonable uh John
Brennan
now talk about a credible guy
John Brennan was one of the people who
helped collect the 50 Intel prior and
current Intel people
who
who said that the Hunter's laptop was
Russian disinformation
yeah he's also the same John Brennan who
pushed the
Russia collusion Oaks
but there's no reason to believe that
he's lying this time when he says that
Russia attacked itself to teach us a
lesson and let me tell you
I feel it
I feel a little bit closer to
maybe Ukraine will have to surrender
I mean if Russia keeps bombing its own
assets
I don't know if any of us are safe
I mean what if Putin decides to bomb
Moscow next
what are we going to do
would Ukraine Just Surrender I mean
the strategy looks pretty strong
so yeah Russia will be attacking itself
because attacking Russia or I'm sorry
attacking Ukraine didn't work out at all
uh I think Putin needed to win
he's like okay have we attacked anything
successfully lately
ooh
you know the uh the news from the Don
Bass
not so good not so good okay we need to
have some kind of a win can you please
attack something successfully I need to
be able to say we attacked something and
we got it we got the wind
well you know the ukrainians are really
dug in
don't tell me what you can't do
I need a win
you need to blow something up and I need
to be able to say that I got that thing
you know we're running out of weapons
and our soldiers are not really well no
no
I need you to blow something up and give
me a win
well you know the only thing we could
actually blow up
would be our own stuff
I don't need to know the details just
give me a wind
so then the Russian general said all
right what's the least protected thing
we owned and they thought
our pipeline we could blow that damn
pipeline up
so Putin gets the win for a successful
military operation against its own
pipeline
according to John Brennan
has he ever lied to us
I mean
you can trust John Brennan right
I mean just because he ran an
organization whose entire job is lying
to us
and he's documented as the biggest liar
in American politics
Bar None bar none
but this time he's totally uh telling
the truth
but the funniest thing was watching I
think it was uh
Keeler uh on CNN who asked Brennan uh
why he thinks that Putin blew up his own
pipeline
to teach the West the lesson when the
pipeline they could just turn it off
she was like you could just turn it off
you have to blow it up
uh then I saw some speculation that
really it was a clever trick and the and
that Brennan is right
and here's why they blew it up because
if Putin had not blown it up
he might be legally required to turn it
on later to fulfill legal contracts
so to get out of his legal contracts
later he blew up his own pipeline
now if there's one thing that we know is
true
Putin is very concerned about his legal
agreements
and he would be willing to bomb his
entire country
so that people didn't think he'd be the
kind of guy who'd say one thing and then
do another because that's not the kind
of reputation you could have out there
perfectly reasonable
perfectly reasonable
because you know
prior to knowing that Putin was bombing
his own pipeline according to John
Brennan
I didn't know if Putin was trustworthy
or not
you know I didn't know if you could
depend on him to keep a deal
but now that I know he would be willing
to bomb his own assets
to get out of a deal
well I trust him more and I think that's
what he was going for he was going for
some kind of a business credibility kind
of a play and I think when you see
somebody blow up their own assets so
they don't have to deliver what they
promised
that makes me trust them
so so I think this hypothesis that
Russia is behind the blowing up of their
own asset completely feasible
completely I buy it
yup totally believable
now as a backdrop to this and don't make
too much of a big deal about this
because we know what the story is we
know Russia blew up their own assets
because John Brennan would never lie to
us on CNN that's something we know for
sure
but some people you know there's always
some Rogue
there's always something like goofy
bastard who's got some conspiracy theory
right so here's the conspiracy
that's going around now there's
a video of Joe Biden before the Ukraine
invasion
saying in public I know it's ridiculous
but saying in public in the clearest
possible terms
that if Russia invaded those pipelines
were no longer going to be functional
now some people say that matters
and the fact that he directly that Biden
directly said if you do this
we're going to take care of those
pipelines
and he gave you a smile that looked
exactly like he meant blowing them up
because there's a smile that says I mean
blowing them up right you have to see
the video
here's how you talk if you don't mean
blowing them up
uh Mr Biden are you saying that you're
gonna you know shut down those pipelines
yes we'll we'll use whatever means we
can we're going to shut down those
pipelines
okay that's how you say it if you don't
mean we're going to blow them up
here's how you here's how Biden said it
so how will you do it
I promise you we can do it
now that's pretty much the blow it up
face isn't it
I mean I think he told us he's going to
blow him up and then they blew up
now to me this looks like nothing but
giant energy companies
uh manipulating our government to reduce
the competitiveness of their competitor
that literally is all I see here do you
see anything except a giant Energy
company has control of our military
and the military is doing the bidding of
some Energy company in the United States
that's what it looked like to me it
looked like it literally was a
commercial
a commercial operation to increase the
prophets of American gas companies
now
I think that's the reason it happened
also
maybe has some military you know
Homeland
European protection whatever I mean that
might be good too but you know when
follow the money works this well
if you can follow the money this
directly I don't know if you need to ask
any about their questions I mean to me
to me this doesn't even look like a
national interest so much as just a
Energy company interest
now you could argue and I'm going to
argue this
that when the United States
supports its energy industry
even doing things that you might think
are over the line or sketchy or too far
or whatever
that the United States does better
you know that there are a lot of smart
people who say basically look at the the
energy situation of any country and you
know everything you need to know
that's pretty close to true isn't it if
you've got a country that has cheap
energy or is a major producer of energy
they seem to always be doing fine
so if you take care of your energy
business
your country is going to be a strong
country if you don't take care of your
energy business and you have to buy
energy from other people and that's all
you have you're just a buyer of energy
you're going to be very vulnerable
so
um I'm not sure that it is the wrong
that is wrong for the country to do
things that are literally just good for
big energy companies in the United
States
no it's it's like you know it's creepy
and it's unethical and it's it's not
free markets you could find a hundred
ethical and moral reasons why we
shouldn't do it
easily right it's not it wouldn't take
any effort at all
at the same time
having our government and our Energy
company is basically being one entity
and working for each other's benefit
actually kind of works kind of works
yeah I I mean I don't like it
but strangely it works
all right
um
can we can we do this next conversation
without
without some of you just flying out of
control
okay see if I can just get through this
next two minutes
without somebody just going nuts on me
okay
so there's the there's a trending
hashtag for face masks no I hate face
masks I am anti-face Max I hate them and
we're not going to talk about the
science
however
it is trending again because cases are
up and and people are pushing for her
face masks again now in this context
some doctor uh
some doctor tweeted the studies that he
says support face masks I retweeted it
with a comment on just the messenger now
the way you should take that when I say
I'm just the messenger
that means I'm not endorsing it
that's how you should interpret it if I
say hey look at this this looks pretty
solid then I'm probably endorsing it or
at least I think there's nothing wrong
with it but if I say I'm just the
messenger
you should very clearly see
that I'm just telling you whether other
people are saying so you know
because I had always wondered why it is
that the people on the right
say there are no there are no studies
that support masks
and the people on the left say there are
tons of them they're all over the place
have you ever wondered about that like
why could it both be true that
there are tons of studies saying they
work at the same time there are no
studies to say they work
and both be true
so I think I think maybe I have
something close to an answer
which is this list of studies it was
sort of a study about other studies of
masks
it it took about 10 seconds
for you know Andre's back house and
other people who know about data to just
rip it about is ridiculous
so apparently this study happened at the
very beginning of the pandemic
when all of our data was bad and
basically it was just a use it was a
bunch of useless studies
they were summed up by another useless
study
now
if you were non-critical
and you saw that there were a whole
bunch of studies in the same direction
what would you do if you were not very
let's say sophisticated about how people
lie with data
I think it would be pretty convincing
now let me stop again because I know a
whole bunch of people are flying crazy
at home no I'm anti-mask and I have been
from the start
but the conversation about it is part of
the context of America so I can't avoid
it
so I think I think that's the I think
the entire thing comes down to this
I think the entire thing comes down to
the people on the left believe the
studies
because there are lots of them
but the people on the right don't
believe the studies because when you
look at them they don't seem credible
you know they just don't seem to be a
time period and it doesn't look like
they could
untangle all the confounders you know
all the variables that could affect them
I mean the most obvious thing is that
the people who are likely to wear masks
have something in common with each other
right
and the country is most likely to do it
they probably have something in common
as a country so I just don't know that
you can sort it out
I also don't believe
that they would have kept in the study
anything that said the opposite
right because when you do a study of
studies let's say a meta study or even
just a study of studies which would be
different
you're you are deciding what's in and
what's out
what they never do is throw everything
in
because they always say well you know
this one is so big you don't want to put
this one in there it'll skew things or
they'll say this one is so low quality
that even though the other ones are
higher quality
you know we'll throw it out so so those
studies end up being subjective
accidentally
some meta studies are well made some are
not right and usually we can't tell the
difference
can't tell the difference all right so
is everybody comfortable that I'm
anti-mask period
period anti-mask
but now you understand why the left
believes they work
because there are people
sending studies around it is sort of the
laundry list thing if there are enough
studies it doesn't matter that they're
all bad
because there are lots of them
so I think that's the whole story
anyway
um
so the
the January 6th gasolators this this
just amazes me because every once in a
while you have to go back and and shake
your head at this
the entire January 6 situation depends
on one assumption
more than one but one that I care about
and the one assumption is what Trump
actually believed
am I right because if Trump believed the
election was genuinely fake
then why he did make sense actually it
would make sense as a candidate and it
would make sense as a patriot it would
make sense as an American
if he genuinely believed the vote was
hanky
now the entire January 6th thing depends
on him
depends on his critics knowing what he
really secretly thought that he has
never said out loud to anybody that we
have any evidence of
so here's Trump the person who says
everything he thinks
am I right
Trump is the person who says everything
he thinks
and yet there's no evidence whatsoever
in writing any reports any not even
Anonymous reports of trump ever being
inconsistent
with his belief that the election was
sketchy
so
why is it that the most unrealistic
assumption is underpinning the entire
thing and we don't pay attention to that
I feel like I'm the only one who's ever
mentioned this
actually ever
have you ever seen anybody else say
everything depends on what he was
thinking
and if you were to make two hypotheses
of what he was thinking
do you think there's really any chance
that you thought the election was
um
Fair
because he was he was thinking the same
thing that most of the Dem most of the
Republicans thought don't you believe
that most Republicans thought it was
sketchy most
I think most did
so if he had the same opinion that's
most Republicans who had the same
information he had we were all just
watching TV right he didn't have like
secret you know secret Intel he was just
watching TV like the rest of us so if he
watched TV and you watched TV and you
said to yourself that doesn't look like
a fair election to me I don't know if
you're right or wrong but say that was
your opinion
why would you think he wouldn't have
that opinion
like what what is what possible argument
could you make
that he would singularly believe the
election was fair when everybody was
looking at exactly the same information
at the same time
all the people on his side said
I'm not so sure if that election was
fair and of course you know doing the
the most obvious analysis you can do
did the Democrats think the election was
fair
did Hillary think the election was fair
when Trump won the first time
no
the most the most
um
common believable and ordinary
assumption you can make about this
situation as well as when Hillary lost
the most common ordinary assumption is
that the people who lost genuinely
believe there's some question about the
outcome
they genuinely believe it now
if I were Trump's team that's the only
thing I would talk about
I say are you making the case that you
believe the president actually thought
he lost when nobody else thought that
now it's separate from the argument of
whether he really lost so you know their
trick is to argue whether or not it's
true
whether or not it's true that the
election was fair
has nothing to do with this
because nobody was operating on the
truth
because it was unknowable there was a
suspicion
but at that time it was pretty hard to
know what was true and what wasn't if
you were biased toward thinking the
election was rigged as the Democrats
were when they lost as Republicans are
when they lost as the Democrats will be
again if they lose you don't think the
Democrats are going to say the election
was rigged if they lose the next
election of course they will
do you think they'll believe it
yes yes I do I do think they'll believe
it
that's how it works
so
now am I Wrong Am I Wrong that
everything follows from that assumption
am I missing anything
the entire understanding of that day
has everything to do with what Trump
secretly actually believed about the
election
because if he believed that that was
rigged and he didn't do a thing
about it I wouldn't vote for him
would you
I mean I don't vote anyway but but
seriously if he believed it it actually
been rigged and he did nothing didn't
complain about it just sort of you know
slunk off to his retirement
he wouldn't be the person you you
thought you voted for the first time if
he did
and I'm not sure you'd want any
president to be like that
I mean I want my president to say what
he believes
and to act on it
and
uh Saturday defense it wouldn't be an
insanity defense because most
Republicans believe there was some
problem with the election
now just to be clear so I don't get
banned I'm not aware of any proof of
election irregularity as scale I'm not
aware of any
but would I be I'm not sure I would be
yeah he told them to go down and
peacefully protest now he did he did of
course want to do wanted Pence to delay
things and there are smart people who
say that wasn't legal and you can't do
that and I guess that's the bipartisan
bill that even
even Schumer is willing to say something
about the
the electoral votes you don't want to
play with them after the election
and that's probably I haven't looked at
it but probably a good idea I mean if
it's bipartisan probably a good idea
all right
um
it was the most perfect election of all
time well I've said many times
that it's a miracle that all 50 of our
election systems work perfectly
we are told
and yet every other organization and
system that we know about is completely
corrupt
which we know and for sure you don't
have to wonder you know we know that now
is the FBI corrupt yeah yeah yeah we
know that
that there's no longer in question
all right
uh
have I complained too many times about
how my critics like to come into my men
into my tweets
and compare me to Garfield and other
comics
and it's usually it looks like this
oh uh the Garfield guy again
or here comes the Beetle Bailey guy to
say something
and it took me a while to figure out
that these were compliments
their attempts their attempts at insults
but you know do you see what they get
wrong it took me a while to notice
why is it that it's an insult to call me
Garfield
what makes that an insult
it makes it an insult because the person
saying it believes that everybody who
sees that understands that Garfield is a
less Good comic than Dilbert
right
Am I Wrong the reason they would call me
these other cartoons the whole point of
it is they believe the other cartoons
are of lesser equality
yeah you know what they don't call me
peanuts
they don't call me um
they don't call me Calvin and Hobbes
although I have seen that but that's
that's rare
do you know why
because my my critics believe that those
two Comics are unambiguously better than
Dilbert so do I I mean I mean most
people would agree with that
so they call me the Lesser comics
because the whole point of it is that
they're not as good as my comic
and every time it happens now I'm
thinking
I feel like you just complimented me
because this wouldn't even make sense
the entire point of the insult is that
that other comic is a lower quality than
than mine
yeah Kathy
Etc now I'm not saying that they're
lower quality I'm saying that that's the
whole point of people saying it is that
they believe they're lower quality so
thank you for the thank you for the
compliments I appreciate it keep them
coming
here are some things that I read about
myself uh in the fall in the past week
so if you wonder Scott
do you ever get much trouble online
do you ever get bothered by things that
people say to you online well not that
much
but uh here's some things I got called
this week uh a holocaust denier
uh and uh
um it is alleged that I believe that
rape is okay because it's natural
that that's actually a widespread
opinion about me on the internet
is a widespread opinion that I believe
that rape's fine it's just natural
somebody actually thinks that was my
opinion or is my opinion
okay
um
fine and people also believe that I'm an
anti-mass Crusader who is secretly
trying to get you to all wear masks
so at the same time that I'm one of the
most notable critics of masks
spend a lot of time notably talking
about not wearing my mask and required
masking places trying to mobilize people
to get rid of their masks and so that
makes me Pro mask if they read my mind
they can see that like on the inside
even though on the outside I'm totally
anti-mask but on the inside they can
they can see
that because of the things I tweet
they can tell
they can tell that because even though I
don't wear a mask because I'm so afraid
that I'm really Pro masked
um so there are books coming out more
books about Trump of course
and uh
they're running out of insults
the every book that comes out about
Trump they've got to have a new you know
thing
but they're running out of the good ones
so here's some new books and it doesn't
matter who who wrote them right it
doesn't matter at this point it wouldn't
matter if it's Maggie Haberman or
somebody else but these are somebody
else
but they're in the news today so one of
the things is that Trump was way more
serious about buying Greenland that you
knew
he was actually really serious about
buying Greenland and he made an argument
that you know it's it's sort of close to
our domain and would be valuable to us
and you know Denmark wasn't using it for
much anyway
but apparently he actually negotiated
with Denmark to some degree
he was actually trying to get it now is
that a criticism
is it a criticism that Trump literally
tried to buy Greenland
that feels like the opposite of a
criticism
don't they have valuable minerals
isn't it geopolitically you know
geostrategically important
ah
I mean
that that should have been framed as a
compliment now the fact that it didn't
happen
is that is that an insult or is that a
criticism no it was a long shot
it was a long shot that cost him nothing
except embarrassment
and he was willing to take the
embarrassment
for the potential of maybe having an
upside that would be amazing
I mean again it looks like a criticism
that's more of a compliment I want the
president who does that all right here's
another one here's another criticism
they have to say I don't know is that
really a criticism
one of the books claims that Trump was
way more serious than you thought about
withdrawing from NATO
is that a criticism
what would be happening in Ukraine right
right now
well I don't know but it wouldn't be
costing us money
um I don't know maybe Ukraine would have
just rolled over and Putin would own
Ukraine and we wouldn't have known the
difference
and we'd be getting our Ukrainian wheat
and Europe would be getting their stuff
and ukrainians uh corrupt government
would be putting out of business and
they would go back to sort of how things
used to be you were you know Russia
dominated that country
now that would be bad for the ukrainians
I mean I guess they would say that I
don't know maybe someone
but can we say that Trump was wrong
about withdrawing from NATO based on
what we know today
it's actually not obvious is it
you could certainly make the case that
it's a good thing we're in NATO it's the
only thing to stop Putin and that would
be a strong argument
but you could also make the case that
maybe none of this would look this way
if he had pulled that in NATO
and and Putin didn't feel threatened the
other possibility is that Putin wouldn't
feel threatened by having NATO on his
doorstep if America was not part of NATO
I mean everything would have looked
different wouldn't it
so I don't know
you know I'm not saying it would have
been a good idea to pull on a NATO
that's not my opinion
but it's not obvious which was the right
right way to go
which is not obvious
now I think that also when he talks
about pulling out of NATO that's that
could have been a negotiating position
as well
so he may have been really serious about
pulling out if the other countries
didn't step up with money
you get that right he could be totally
serious about pulling out if you don't
give us more money but then other
countries gave more money
so I don't know if he still was still as
adamant about pulling out but I think he
was serious if they didn't give more
money which I would have agreed with
actually I think you did have to
threaten to pull out
if they didn't cough up more money I
think that part was right
and then his age worried that he might
try to start a war with Iran or North
Korea because of his crazy ways
neither of those things were even close
he wasn't close to a war with Iran
it wasn't even close I don't think was
he
I didn't say anything that looked even
close it looked like he was just gonna
you know boycott them forever or
whatever
and what about North Korea
North Korea is one of his success
stories
he took the temperature away down in
North Korea I mean what was he going to
do nuke North Korea his friend
so the the books have completely run out
of material
uh
think about his legal troubles
correct me if I'm wrong but not counting
January 6 for which no indictments are
likely to come
say the experts
his biggest legal risk at the moment
correct me if I'm wrong because it might
be what I'm missing
is a civil case
against Trump the company not even
against Trump himself so not Criminal
and not even against Trump am I right
that's his biggest risk right now and
what is what is the power of the case
the entire case let me summarize it
the Trump company handled their
accounting the way all normal companies
do
that's it that's the case they did
things exactly the way normal companies
do
they they took the highest number they
thought they could get away with when
valuing it for loans
and then they got allowed
and then they paid back the loan and
then the bank was happy
but when they were doing their property
tax assessments you want the lowest
number you can get away with there
he went the opposite way
like everybody
like everybody
now he may have exaggerated or the Trump
company may have exaggerated more
than other companies do and that would
be worth discussing
but no matter what it is it's going to
be a civil fine
it's not exactly the crime of the
century to have exaggerated more when
you are the company that exaggerates
more and your entire business model is
built on your brand
right the Trump brand is the value of
the business
and so would you expect somebody whose
entire business model is about telling
people their brand is better than maybe
it is
this is a little business model so if he
did it consistently everywhere he told
everybody that he was better than
better than maybe somebody else thinks
I don't know
it might be a crime
likely you might be able to find a jury
who says yeah that's slightly a crime
that's a little bit more exaggerating
than I think you should have done so
maybe you should pay a fine
that is just business as usual for every
company every big company that gets
audited
do you think they get away from the
audit with nothing
do you think there's nothing just pick a
company just pick any company
pick Google do you think if Google got
audited they'd end up paying nothing
sometimes Maybe
but it's very common
that a you know traditional company gets
audited and pays a little extra money
because they exaggerated something
that's how it happens they exaggerate
stuff
or minimize things
yeah so just just think about the fact
that what the remaining complaints about
Trump
I've all just kind of dissolved so the
January 6th thing has turned into
nothing they're trying to breathe some
life into it with the you know the jaws
of life today I guess so they're trying
to make the nothing into something but
January 6 proved there was nothing
at least nothing of criminal and
dateable quality
now all of his other legal problems have
gone away except that trivial one that
really is nothing
what's left
what's left
anything
so he wasn't colluding with Russia
I mean what's left
the only thing left is how his
performance would be compared to Biden
now of course Democrats look at Biden
and say yeah he's killing it he's doing
great
and Republicans say the opposite
uh
although they have the lady who claimed
that he raped her in a dressing room in
a group in a store
Gene Carroll so I guess she's
doing her lawsuit again but nobody
thinks that's going anywhere right
that isn't that just a he said she said
situation that's the end of it
on Twitter today must said he would
discuss buying into Rumble oh did
that really happen
did that really happen
[Music]
holy what's the price of uh rum
right now
can somebody check the stock price so
rum was 12 yesterday or this morning
oh he was asked to and he declined oh
come on
all right he was asked about it and he
declined
what don't get me all excited about that
now
um you know the reason I'm excited is
because I'm an investor so I invested in
the locals platform
which got combined with Rumble so I
ended up accidentally with some rumble
stock which turned out to be
the the best accidental investment I
ever made
yeah rum is worth a shot nicely done
rum is worth a shot okay
well done
all right
um question
how many of you think that Elon Musk is
secretly bankrolling The Babylon bee
because if you notice that the Babylon
bees uh let's say their budget seems to
be way better than it used to be
the quality of their content and and
also the volume of it is suspiciously
very good
now it's not suspicious that they're
good
because you know they're good
but you know you saw Elon Musk met with
them obviously they got along they have
some kind of connection the founders of
the Babylon Bay now wouldn't that be the
number one most likely thing you would
ever expect
you'd expect him to secretly bankroll it
just because it's funny
if I had his money
nothing would have kept me from giving
some of it to the Babylon B
am I right
assuming that money is No Object which
is a fair assumption money is No Object
and you know he liked them and you know
you know he likes you know he likes
poking the bear
if they didn't get money from him
I would be amazed
I'll be amazed because that they're
they're uh quality of the operation just
went long way up
all right
um
you would like to have a reframe for how
to get women
do you think I can give
this gentleman a reframe that will help
him in his dating success
yes I can
yes I can
you're here's your reframe
you're trying to find a woman uh you're
trying to find the right woman
right and you're not finding right the
right connection stop looking for the
right woman
look for lots of people
you want to increase the number of
people you're exposed to not just
looking for dates just the total number
of people who you were exposed to
and that's how you increase your odds
because well I don't think it's
necessarily true there's somebody for
everybody
it probably isn't
but if your entire universe of people
you're looking to get laid is three
people
your odds are low
if suddenly you increase to 10 people
you have to have sex with a little bit
better but if you're not you know top 20
still low
if you know 100 people well now you're
talking
now you're talking there's somebody
who's going to be looking at you too so
the reframe is it's about numbers it's
not about necessarily just your quality
but
I'm going to make a prediction
whoever is it whoever it is who just
said you know you're having trouble
getting women
I'm going to make a prediction
that when you take your clothes off and
you look in the full-length mirror
you're not delighted
now I don't mean that as an insult just
a purely practical statement of cause
and effect
if you go into the gym
and you have a job
you're going to have some interest from
the other sex
I know it's not fair it's not a fair
world but get your body in shape
all right so here's uh
I might lose my power on the locals feed
because I'm I'm getting a low battery
message
so I can make that stop if I plug you in
instead of
instead of using the microphone I guess
oh
yeah I don't have I don't have the power
for that never mind oh I do hold on
all right locals you can lose the
microphone
but you're going to gain power
all right
so that's the uh
gaining Powers while you're here yeah
yeah it helps to be tall yeah but
I I don't know how many more times I can
give this advice
have you walked down the street lately
and looked at your competition
I mean seriously just go to the mall go
to any any public place and just look
around
see what you're competing with
what would it take to be in the top 10
percent
of fitness
for just the people you see around just
just look around what would it take to
be in the top 10 percent
not much
not much
top 10 percent of fitness
is the most achievable goal in the
United States
I can't even imagine anything easier
than that maybe falling off a bicycle
right maybe jumping in a mud puddle that
would be easier than but being in the
top 10 percent of Fitness just means you
tried
I don't even know if you could fail if
you tried you know I mean if you started
at 400 pounds it's going to take you a
while to get there
but unless you're a grossly you know
you've let things go too far
it's not hard to get back into the top
10 percent and why wouldn't you do that
it's the most controllable thing you can
do so control the hell out of what you
can control
yeah just control control everything you
can control so if you controlled you
know your career stuff by training
making sure you're trained enough you
can have a reasonable job and you can
control your Fitness and your diet
same thing
you're going to be in the top 10 percent
you missed the part about blowing up
pipes you're late
all right so that's my statement
uh
uh am I obsessed with Fitness that's
kind of body shaming too
well I guess you could put a negative
spin on everything but I'm I wouldn't
say I'm obsessed by it
oh yeah I guess I am yeah I'll actually
accept your I'll accept it usually I
don't like that obsessed by because I
had a little judgment in it but I think
I think in this case I am obsessed by it
and I should be
so I would like you to be obsessed by it
as well it's probably the best Obsession
I have
here here's another
hypothesis and reframe for you you ready
you don't have an option of not being
addicted
Let It Go
Let It Go you do not have an option of
not being addicted to something
I don't think
now of course people are different
there's going to be some somebody who's
the exception to everything so I'll give
you that but for the average person
you're going to be addicted to something
it's going to be sex it's going to be
food it's going to be exercise it's
going to be the outdoors it's going to
be your animals it's going to be your
friends something
you're gonna be addicted to something so
instead of saying I'll try to avoid all
addictive things you should go
aggressively at
at trying to make yourself as addicted
as possible
to things that will be good for you
so I'm addicted to exercise
intentionally
I've done everything I could do to make
myself addicted I've given myself treats
I make sure I do things I like I don't
push myself too hard I don't hurt myself
too badly I do everything you could do
to make it a rewarding literally
rewarding I do it at a time of day that
it's going to be the best it recharges
me you know I I track how I feel on days
I exercise versus I don't it's a big
difference that helps me do it I have a
trick for going to the gym when I don't
want to go to the gym I've taught you
this before put on your gym clothes
especially your your Footwear
and just having the right clothes on and
walking around I'm like ah well I might
as well at least go for a short run
you know I got my clothes on right so I
do everything I can do to addict myself
to a positive thing so Obsession
actually is close enough to the right
word
desire and seeking is human trait okay
can I do some push-ups for you
women look at men's shoes now there's a
good tip
whoa David Eagles just paid fifty
dollars to tell me that Narcan vending
machines are being installed in cities
hello here's what I'd like you to do
we're going to go save some lives you
ready
now I said this last night in my man
cave live stream but I'll do it again
for you today
one of the things that this experience
does meaning this live stream that many
of you come to every day is that it's
more than just some content I'm spraying
out
we have formed a an entity accidentally
sort of like an accidental organization
in which we can we have a collaborative
intelligence that can actually solve
some problems
and one of the problems with uh fentanyl
overdoses is bad information
so if you had better information you
would know for example that Narcan is
something you could get at your
drugstore
and if you had it nearby and somebody
was going into overdose situation and
you got there quickly I don't know
exactly how quickly it quickly is but
while they're still alive
and you administer it and I guess you
don't have to be an expert to administer
it it's pretty easy to do
the odds of them living are very good
it's actually very effective
now
the number of people that are watching
this so we've got let's say 3 000 live
here 600 over here probably 40 50 000
people will catch this live stream I'm
going to ask all of you to do the
following thing
research how you could get Narcan in
your state because every every State's
different
in my state you can have the pharmacist
write the prescription
I didn't even know that was a thing
right so uh Carey found that out and has
also spread that news through San Diego
State University
so because of this live stream
one active member uh went and figured
out how you get Narcan in California
just go ask for it and get a
prescription from the prescription from
the pharmacist not a doctor
and then she spread that information
into a a parent group as San Diego State
University
now the parent group was very active and
they were all they were all over it
because there had been a couple of
fentanyl scares just that week
so it was like fresh in the parents mind
oh God the people are dropping like
flies even where my kid goes to school
now they were I believe
some number of them will get
um will get it for their kid to have at
college or something now
there are also some apps
I think uh pulse point is one app that
calls for people who know first aid I
believe
but I think within that umbrella you
could call for people who who if you
sign up for it uh if you had Narcan
I believe you would get notified if
somebody had that app and saw somebody
having an overdose
because they'd be calling for anybody
who had first aid and you'd have that
I believe
so here's what I'm going to ask each of
you to do get educated on on how Narcan
is obtained Where You Are
and then tell your friends if you have a
place to spread the information just
spread the information because I don't
see the government doing this
correct me if I'm wrong Joe Biden should
go on television and say everybody
should get Narcan or have it available
it's different in each state so go
figure it out what it is in your state
and see and just self-organize
so I don't have mine yet but I'll I'll
get mine the way
Carrie suggested I'll go get mine
and then when I have it my my
neighborhood is organized so we have you
know text messaging lists and stuff so
I'll send out a what's that message to
my neighbors and I'll tell them that I
have it so if they if anybody in my
neighborhood has an overdose
there it is and I'm also going to tell
them that if I'm not home
that I can open my garage door with my
app and I'll just tell them where to get
it
so if somebody can get to my house and
five minutes and all of my neighbors can
they can have Narcan in five minutes
and maybe 10 minutes they're back to
administrate if that's in time and I
think I think you do have 10 minutes
does anybody know enough about this to
know
how often do you have enough warning
that you can get to the Narcan do you
know how much time you normally have
there
I mean everything's different right
but you're talking about just a few
minutes
so you need it close
now I believe that if we do what what
some of you will do because I know you
take it seriously some of you will do
this and I think we can save some lives
I believe that this live stream
literally will save lives
and
you know I'm going to act on it I hope
you do too
all right
how do you know if someone is overdosing
on fentanyl I don't know you should
research that as well usually you know
because they've been taking opioids and
somebody usually knows they've been
taking them
and correct me if I'm wrong it's for
opioid overdose not just fentanyl right
can somebody
give me a fact check on that
is the Narcan for yeah it's for so you
don't need to know it's Fentanyl you
need to know that opioids were involved
or failing in that you need to know that
they're a person who might do opioids
and you don't know what else they've
done
so I think you might want to administer
it in some cases if you're not sure
but again I'm not your doctor so don't
believe anything I tell you about that
so that's what you need to look at and
it probably says something on the Box
about when to use it right I would
imagine it comes with instructions
and uh Carrie Chabot is the one you need
to thank for spreading that message
yeah
all right
and then I think there's also something
being contemplated about the Good
Samaritan problem
that you would have legal liability if
you help somebody and things go wrong
no problem giving it to someone who does
not need it we have we have the somebody
who seems to know what they're talking
about
right so you don't need to worry about
if it's the wrong time to give it you
don't need to know if for sure it was
fentanyl it could have been in the
opioid
and if they're still alive
give it to them
right I guess that's the I guess that's
the bottom line
uh
it's not looking good in Florida
so does anybody how many of you are in
Florida
and uh are you looking at a category
five is that what I heard
and you're not leaving
now for category five do you do you do
you stay
do you stay home if it's category five
grab a surfboard yeah
wow
Virginia also has training good
so it'll be a four or five right
so the Santa says to hunker down
uh
basically a CAT5 so you're close to five
what if somebody wants to commit suicide
by a fentanyl
well
I don't know do you really need an
answer for that I mean that's sort of a
depends the situation depends on the
situation but I can't imagine that you
wouldn't try to bring it back
all right
um
you won't get in trouble if you call for
help even if you're on opioids yourself
that's true
that's true yeah if you didn't know that
the uh the Emergency Services they're
not going to arrest you
yeah they're not calling the police
because you have opioids in your system
that's not happening because they know
that that would make everything worse
that's
they're pretty good about that I don't
think you need to worry about that I've
never heard of anybody being in trouble
because the ambulance picked them up
that's not a thing
I wouldn't want to have any on me
but even if you had it on you
I feel like the medical community would
not be turning you over to the police
I don't think so
what do you think I mean there'll always
be an exception but I can't see the
Medics even if they saw some illegal
drugs
I think that they would just sort of you
know leave them in your apartment when
they took you
I just don't think they're taking those
with them
uh
all right
yeah the cops do come but I don't think
the cops are arresting you for having
some possession if you're in the I mean
if you have a user number of pills and
you're having an overdose I don't think
they're arresting you
I don't think so
but I I suppose I could be wrong
don't know everything could be different
all right uh
do what presidents should say Cass you
know I I always find it
obnoxious when people do the uh here's
the letter
that the President should write to make
everything better
and then you read it and you're like ah
no not really that's not really the
letter they should write it just feels
like
telling somebody like Trump what to say
specifically is kind of obnoxious
saying it generally like you know this
would be a good phrase to use then that
makes sense
dear Putin if I were your mother right
Khloe mature said to vote Democrat and
the Hurricanes will disappear did you
see Don Lemon trying to get the NASA guy
to blame climate change for the
hurricane he couldn't get the NASA guy
to to bite any one hurricane could be
attributed to climate change
now he did you know the NASA guy didn't
poo poo climate change
but uh Don Lemon wanted to make it
political and the NASA guy is just like
it's a hurricane
he just wasn't having any of the
politics it was funny oh it was uh it
wasn't NASA it was a national
NOAA
National what
organization of blah blah
uh up
all right well I guess we don't believe
any data anyway
I'm gonna go do something else
and uh
I think we saved some lives today
what do you think
yeah let's go save some lives
and get your uh
get your mug Erica what's the latest bug
count
how many mugs
that's right you probably don't have
that right now I'll follow up with that
later all right that's all for today
yeah it was a lot light news day
it's all you needed today that's all you
needed you didn't need anything else all
right
it's hit on your ex day okay
response to Tim pool and Civil War
um well I don't know that it requires a
response but I guess the question would
be if I thought that Republicans would
be hunted
why would I think there would not be a
civil war
and I just don't think that those two
are very close I think that the way the
Civil War will be is people will vote
right as long as a vote is coming up
you're not going to have a civil war
yeah you might have to worry like if
somebody didn't like the vote if it went
poorly things could get tense
but I don't see any situation
where a civil war happens two years
before an election
in the United States
do you especially when the other team
looks like it's ahead in the polls
nobody's going to start a hot War when
they could wait two years and just vote
in the other guy
or other woman right
and I I think you just have to remind
that remind people of that and they'd be
like okay
yeah so individuals will def and
politicians will hunt Republicans
but that's a long way from the whole
country wants to you know go to war with
each other there's nothing like that
Brewing
foreign
wasn't meant like with a hunting license
and an Elmer fun hat now exactly
what is the diameter of the bottom of
the mug I don't know but it's a 20 ounce
mug
it's similar to the one that you see me
use in the
you know when I do the simultaneous sip
what's that uh you're not telling the
truth and you're saying things that are
killing people
what
what am I saying that's killing people
what
all right
um
if you need a link to the mug see my
Twitter feed this morning it's near the
top
all right
uh that's all for now YouTube I'll talk
to you tomorrow
oh I helped you in your last
relationship with the reframe good bye
for now